SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE / ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE I, SANGHAR : 12-NOV-2025

S.NO. CASE NO NAME OF PARTIES ADVOCATES UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS FIR No. Hearing Status
Party Side 1 Party Side 2

CIVIL JURISDICTION

S.NO. CASE NO NAME OF PARTIES ADVOCATES Hearing Status
Party Side 1 Party Side 2
CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service
1 Ist Class Civil Suits 19/2025
Girdhari VS Liaquat Ali & others   Suneel(ADVO-346-SBC-SGR)   Muhammad Younis(ADVO-733-SBC-SGR)

18.11.2025

Matter called. Plaintiff present, his counsel called absent. Defendant No.1 and 8 so also remaining defendants are called absent. Counsel for defendant No.1 and 2 called absent while Counsel for defendant No.8 also absent. Today Bar has suspended their work. Summons issued to defendant No.9 returned un-served. Issue summons to defendant No. 9, through bailiff and registered post A/D on costs. Put off to 18.11.2025. For service/objection on application U/O 6 Rule 17 CPC.

2 Ist Class Civil Suits 68/2025
Muhammad Arif VS Liaqat Ali   Abid Imam(ADVO-531-SBC-SGR)  

19.11.2025

Matter called. Plaintiff and his counsel are present. Summons returned served upon defendant No.5 to 7 through bailiff and registered post A/D but called absent. Order passed on order sheet. Service held good upon defendant No.5 to 7. Today Bar has suspended their work. Issue summons to defendant No.1 to 4 though bailiff and registered post A/D on costs. Put off to 19.11.2025. For service/W.S/objection/arguments on the point of maintainability of suit/Court fee stamps.

CIVIL JURISDICTION For Issues
3 Ist Class Civil Suits 35/2025
Mst. Sadori VS Dilbar Khan & others   Muhammad Yaseen(ADVO-324-SBC-SGR)   Jamsheed(ADVO-595-SBC-SGR)

20.11.2025

Matter called. Plaintiff and her counsel are called absent. Defendant No.6 himself so also being attorney of defendant No.2(i)a,b,c,2(1 to 5) and 5 to 9 present. Counsels for private defendants called absent. Defendant No.10 to 15 already declared exparte. Issues framed at Ex. Parties to file list of witnesses and documents within seven days. Today Bar has suspended their work. Put off to 20.11.2025 for evidence of plaintiff side.

CIVIL JURISDICTION For Evidence
4 Ist Class Civil Suits 151/2016
Malik Abdul Rasheed VS Mst Tahmina & Others   Tarique Mehmood Arain(ADVO-188-SBC-SGR)  

14.11.2025

Matter called. Attorney of plaintiff present, his counsel called absent. Defendants called absent. Counsel for defendant also absent. Today Bar has suspended their work. In the interest of justice matter adjourned. Defendants are granted last warning and directed to record their evidence on next date in default their side of evidence shall be closed automatically on next date of hearing and matter shall be decided as per available material. Put off to 14.11.2025. for evidence of defendant side as official witnesses of defendant side were already examined.

5 Ist Class Civil Suits 89/2023
Aijaz Ali VS Zia-budin & others   Altaf Hussain(ADVO-297-SBC-SGR)   Muhammad Imran(ADVO-303-SBC-SGR)

19.11.2025

Matter called. Plaintiff present, his witnesses called absent. Counsel for plaintiff also called absent. Defendant present. Counsel for defendant called absent. Today Bar has suspended their work. Matter adjourned in the interest of justice. Put off to 19.11.2025, for cross/evidence of plaintiff side as official witnesses were already examined.

6 Ist Class Civil Suits 49/2024
Muhammad Ayoub VS Khair Muhammad & Others   Muhammad Nisar(ADVO-304-SBC-SGR)   Farman Ali(ADVO-50409-SBC-SGR)

19.11.2025

Matter called. Attorney of plaintiff present, his counsel absent. Defendant present, his counsel also called absent. Today Br has suspended their work. Put off to 19.11.2025 for plaintiff side evidence. Issue summons to remaining official witnesses on costs.

7 Ist Class Civil Suits 70/2024
Jamal-u-ddin VS Muhammad Ali & Others   Tarique Mehmood Arain(ADVO-188-SBC-SGR)  

19.11.2025

Matter called. Plaintiff called absent, his attorney present. Counsel for plaintiff called absent. Defendant No.1 and his counsel are absent. Defendant No.2 to 5 already declared exparte. Today Bar has suspended their work. Perusal of record it appears that issues were framed on; 26.03.2025 and evidence of two official witnesses were recorded on 14.07.2025. Plaintiff is directed to proceed the matter as per law without filing un-necessary adjournments. Put off to 19.11.2025 for hearing on application U/S 151 CPC/evidence of plaintiff side as official witnesses were already examined.