Matter called. Plaintiff called absent, his counsel present. Summons returned served upon L.Rs of defendant No.1 but called absent, Mr.Jamshed Laghari advocate filed adjournment application along with power and copy of power of attorney on behalf of L.Rs of defendant No.1. Order on it. Order passed on order sheet. Service held good upon L.Rs of defendant No.1. Attorney of L.Rs of defendant No.1 present. Put off to 10.10.2025. Office is directed to repeat summons to defendant No.2 to 8 through bailiff and registered post A/D on costs. Also call detailed report from Mukhtiarkar Sinjhoro. for Report/service/W.S-objections.

Matter called. Plaintiff and his counsel are present. Summons returned served upon private defendants who are present except defendant No.4 who called absent. Summons also returned served upon defendant No.10 who called absent while remaining official defendants already served. Private defendants filed application for time. Order on it. Order passed on order sheet. Service held good upon all defendants except defendant No.4 who per statement of private defendants has been expired. Counsel for plaintiff is directed to submit proper application. Put off to 26.09.2025, for W.S/objection by all defendants except defendant No.4/further proceedings.

Matter called. Plaintiff and his counsel are present. Defendant No.1 and 8 are absent, while remaining defendants also called absent. Counsel for defendant No.1 and 2 present. Counsel for defendant No.8 also present. Counsel for defendant No.1 and 2 received the copy of application U/O 1 Rule 10 CPC today, hence he requests for time to file objections. Request allowed. Put off to 22.09.2025 For objection on applications U/O 1 Rule 10 CPC/Application U/O 7 Rule 11 CPC/hearing on application U/O 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC.

Matter called. Attorney of plaintiff present, his counsel called absent. Defendant No.2 herself so also being attorney of defendant No.1 and 3 present. Counsel for defendant No.1 to 3 called absent, his junior present. Defendant No.4 to 8 already declared exparte. Issues framed at Ex. Both parties to file list of witnesses and documents within seven days. Put off to 25.09.2025. For filing list of witnesses and documents by both parties.

Matter called. Plaintiff and his Counsel are present. Defendant No.1(b) so also remaining defendants are called absent. Defendant No: 17 and 19 are absent, their counsel present. Counsel for defendant No.1 and 2 present. Counsel for defendant No.3 to 13 and 20 are present. Counsel for defendant filed Application U/O 13 Rule 1 and 2 CPC and Application U/O 16 Rule 1 and 2 CPC. Order on it. Notice to other side. Arguments heard. Order passed. Both applications are allowed subject to fine of Rs.1000/- on each application to be paid in Masjid. Issue summons to official witnesses on costs. In the interest of justice and choice of both parties counsel matter adjourned. Since the defendants are avoiding to record their evidence though sufficient time was granted to them and they are remained absent so also today they are absent without intimation. Defendants are granted last chance to record their evidence, in case of failure, their side of evidence shall be closed. Since the matter is old one and to be fixed twice in a week hence in the larger interest of justice and at the choice of counsels matter is adjourned to 22.09.2025. for evidence of defendant side.

Both consolidated suits called. Plaintiff present while defendants called absent. Counsel for plaintiff and counsel for defendants are present. DDA present. Counsel for defendant filed side close statement. Order on it. Ex.71. Counsel for defendant pointed out that Application U/O 18 Rule 18 CPC is pending in suit filed by Dhiyangir hence he requested to fix the application for arguments. The application U/O 18 Rule 18 CPC is also fixed for arguments so also main matter is also fixed for final arguments. Since the matter is old one and there are directions to fix the old matter twice in a week therefore matter adjourned in the interest of justice. Put off to 25.09.2025 for final arguments/arguments on Appl.U/O 18 Rule 18 CPC.

Matter called. Plaintiff and his Counsel are present. Private contesting defendants and their counsel is also present. Counsel for defendant No.1,5,7,11,23 and 25 called absent. Inayat Ali clerk of Mukhtiarkar Estate Sanghar present and examined at Ex.38. He produced documents at Ex.38/A to Ex.38/D respectively. Put off to 23.09.2025 for defendant side evidence. Office is directed to issue summons to remaining official witnesses of defendants side on costs.

Both consolidated suits called. Plaintiff present while defendants called absent. Counsel for plaintiff and counsel for defendants are present. DDA present. Counsel for defendant filed side close statement. Order on it. Ex.71. Counsel for defendant pointed out that Application U/O 18 Rule 18 CPC is pending in suit filed by Dhiyangir hence he requested to fix the application for arguments. The application U/O 18 Rule 18 CPC is also fixed for arguments so also main matter is also fixed for final arguments. Since the matter is old one and there are directions to fix the old matter twice in a week therefore matter adjourned in the interest of justice. Put off to 25.09.2025 for final arguments/arguments on Appl.U/O 18 Rule 18 CPC.