| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 1477/2026 | Haq Nawaz & another VS The State | Shabir Hussain Umrani() | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-497 | 309/2026 Shahdadpur |
Bail application u/s 497-Cr.P.C called. learned advocate for applicant/accused Haq Nawaz and Haseebullah is present. Learned ADPP for the state is present. B.A is fixed for hearing. Heard Arguments. Order passed and announced in open court. Bail application is dismissed. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 2 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 1341/2026 | Suleman and others VS The State | Shabir Hussain Umrani() | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-SGR),Sanjay Kumar(ADVO-539-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-498 | 72/2026 Shahpur Chakar |
ABA called. Applicant/Accused persons namely Sulleman, Abid Ali, Asghar Ali, Roshan Ali, Ghaffar, Jabbar and Nadeem are present on ad interim pre arrest bail. Advocate for applicant/accused is present. Complainant and his advocate are present. Heard Arguments. Order passed and announced in open court. The interim pre-arrest bail already granted to applicants/accused persons namely Sulleman, Abid Ali, Asghar Ali, Roshan Ali, Ghaffar, Jabbar and Nadeem is hereby CONFIRMED on the same terms and conditions, including the surety already furnished, subject to his appearance before the learned trial Court on each and every date of hearing unless exempted in accordance with law. |
| 3 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 1437/2026 | Noor Muhammad & Others VS The State | Muhammad Tahir(ADVO-638-SBC-MKS) | Cr.PC-498 | 267/2026 Shahdadpur |
ABA called. Applicant/Accused persons namely Noor Muhammad, Lal Muhammad alias Lal Bux, Javed and Shahbaz are present on ad interim pre arrest bail. Advocate for applicant/accused is present. Complainant is present. Mr. Mehboob advocate appeared and filed his vakalatnama on behalf of complainant. Heard Arguments. Order passed and announced in open court. The interim pre-arrest bail already granted to Applicant/Accused persons namely Noor Muhammad, Lal Muhammad alias Lal Bux, Javed and Shahbaz is hereby CONFIRMED on the same terms and conditions, including the surety already furnished, subject to his appearance before the learned trial Court on each and every date of hearing unless exempted in accordance with law. |
|
| 4 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 1457/2026 | Ali Hassan VS The State | Keeshor Kumar(ADVO-607-SBC-SGR) | Mahboob Ali(ADVO-6523-SBC-HYD) | Cr.PC-498 | 115/2026 Shahpur Chakar |
ABA called. Applicant/Accused Ali Hassan is present on ad interim pre arrest bail. ADPP for the state, advocate for applicant/accused are present. Complainant and his advocate are present. Heard Arguments from both the side. Order passed and announced in open court. The interim pre-arrest bail already granted to applicants/accused Ali Hassan, is hereby RECALLED, and his request for confirmation of pre-arrest bail is DECLINED. His interim bail shall stand vacated. |
| 5 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 1472/2026 | Mumtaz Ali & Others VS The State | Asif Ali(ADVO-52491-SBC-MPK) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-498 | 40/2026 Darya Khan Rind @ Maqsoodo Rind |
ABA called. Applicant/Accused persons namely Mumtaz Ali, Jan Muhammad and Imran are present on ad interim pre arrest bail. ADPP for the state, advocate for applicant/accused is present. Complainant is present. Mr. Ghulam Mustafa Bagrani advocate appeared and filed his vakalatnama on behalf of complainant. Complainant filed his no objection affidavit. Heard Arguments. Order passed and announced in open court. The interim pre-arrest bail already granted to applicants/accused Mumtaz Ali, Jan Muhammad and Imran is hereby CONFIRMED on the same terms and conditions, including the surety already furnished, subject to his appearance before the learned trial Court on each and every date of hearing unless exempted in accordance with law. |
| 6 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 1475/2026 | Liaquat Ali VS The State | Rizwan Ahmed(ADVO-753-SBC-SGR) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-498 | 337/2026 Shahdadpur |
ABA called. Applicant/Accused Liaquat Ali is present on ad interim pre arrest bail. ADPP for the state, advocate for applicant/accused is present. Complainant is called absent. Heard Arguments. Order passed and announced in open court. The interim pre-arrest bail already granted to applicant/accused Liaquat Ali is hereby CONFIRMED on the same terms and conditions, including the surety already furnished, subject to his appearance before the learned trial Court on each and every date of hearing unless exempted in accordance with law. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 7 | SC (Murder Trial) 256/2021 | The State VS Chettan | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR),Muhammad Imran(ADVO-303-SBC-SGR) | Zafar Ali Kaloi(ADVO-727-SBC-SGR) | PPC-302,PPC-324,PPC-325,PPC-336,PPC-337-Fv,PPC-337-L,PPC-398 | 92/2021 Shahdadpur |
Sessions case called. Accused Chettan is produced by Superintendent District Prison & Correctional Facility Sanghar. ADPP for the state is present. Counsel for accused is present. WHC Ghulam Shabir is present and no other P.Ws are present. Case is fixed for evidence. Deposition of P.W 13 WHC Ghulam Shabir is recorded at Ex. 22. Thereafter learned ADPP for the state filed application u/s 540-Cr.P.C. Order on it. Notice to accused. In the larger interest of justice case is adjourned. Put off to 06.10.2026 for hearing of application u/s 540-Cr.P.C and evidence. Jail authority is directed to produce the accused on next date of hearing through video link. |
| 8 | PPC 228/2023 | The State VS Naseer Khan @ Porho & Others | Zainul Abideen(ADVO-222-SBC-SGR) | Altaf Hussain Chandio(ADVO-861-SBC-NWP) | PPC-114,PPC-302,PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-A(ii),PPC-337-Fi,PPC-337-L,PPC-34 | 64/2022 Sarhari |
Sessions case called. Accused Naseer Khan @ Porho and Mumtaz @ Bhutto are present on bail. Co-accused Imam Din has been died and proceedings against him abated, while remaining accused Azeem had declared as P.O. ADPP for the State & learned counsel for complainant is present. Defence counsel is called absent. Case is fixed for evidence/cross examination of P.W Shaman and further chief of ASI Abdul Ghafoor. P.W Shaman and ASI Abdul Ghafoor are present and no other P.Ws are present. Summons issued against P.Ws and same is returned as per endorsement of process server. Order on it. Accused Naser Khan submitted an application that his counsel is not feeling well and excuse his absence and adjourn the case. Order on it. In the larger interest of justice case is adjourned. Present P.Ws are bound down. Repeat summon against remaining PWs . Call case property from P.S Sarhari. Put off to: 05-10-2026, for cross examination of P.W Shaman Ali & further chief of PW ASI Abdul Ghafoor Palh. Present accused are directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 491 | |||||||
| 9 | Application u/s 491 CrPc 276/2026 | Achar VS SSP Sanghar & another | Naeem Ahmed(ADVO-458-SBC-SGR) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-491 | / |
Habus corpus application u/s 491-Cr.P.C called. Applicant is called absent and his counsel is present. Opponents are present. Mr. Ghulam Mustafa Bagrani advocate appeared and filed his vakalatnama on behalf of opponents. Police reports are received from SHO of P.S Shahdadpur. Heard Arguments. Learned advocate for applicant do not press the application. Order on it. Order passed and announced in open court. Application is dismissed as not pressed. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 10 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 2266/2026 | Mst. Samreen Bukhari & another VS SSP Sanghar & Others | Shabir Hussain Umrani() | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-22-A | / |
Cr. Misc. Application U/S 22-A Cr.P.C called. Applicant is called absent and her counsel is present. Respondent/proposed accused are called absent. Police report are received from complaint cell, Sanghar and from SHO of P.S Shahpur Chakar. Learned advocate for applicant requested for adjourn the matter. Request is allowed. In the larger interest of justice matter is adjourned. Put off to 02-10-2026 for hearing. |
| 11 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 2285/2026 | Mst. Suraya & Others VS SSP Sanghar & Others | Shabir Hussain Umrani() | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Cr. Misc. Application U/S 22-A (iii) Cr.P.C called. Applicants and their learned counsel are present. Respondent/proposed accused are present. Police reports are received from complaint cell and SHO of P.S Shahdadpur. Mr. Imran Ghori advocate appeared and filed his vakalatnama and objection. Order thereon. Heard Arguments. Order passed and announced in open court. Application is disposed of as per order. The protection is hereby allowed to applicant. The respondents if have any grievance may approached proper forum. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Final Arguments | |||||||
| 12 | Other CR/Sessions Cases (If Any) 413/2024 | Faqir Hussain VS Allah Dino & Others | Zamin Ul Hussain(ADVO-24474-SBC-KHS) | Faheem Ali (ADVO-698-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-Section 200 ( Direct and Private Complaint) | / |
Session Case / Illegal dispossession Act,2005 called. Complainant and his learned counsel are present. Accused Allah Dino, Nadeem, Haji, Nadeem and More are present on bail and their learned counsel is present. Heard Final Arguments of learned advocate for complainant. Judgment passed at Ex. 18 and announced in open court. All the accused persons are acquitted u/s 265-H(i) Cr.P.C. All the accused are present on bail, their bail bond stand cancelled and their sureties are stand discharged. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Surety Proceedings | |||||||
| 13 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 996/2026 | Noor Muhammad & another VS The State | Sanjay Kumar (ADVO-5427-SBC-HYD) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-498 | 226/2026 Shahdadpur |
Surety proceedings called. Surety namely Naeem Shah is present. Learned counsel for surety is present. Matter is fixed for Arguments on reply of surety. Heard Arguments. Order passed and announced in open court. Since the accused have obtained pre-arrest bail from Honourable High Court. The notice to surety is hereby vacated and proceeding stopped accordingly. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 14 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 244/2026 | The State VS Arshad Ali | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 86/2026 Shahdadpur |
Sessions case called. Accused Arshad Ali is on bail, but he is called absent. Surety of accused namely Sadam Hussain is repeatedly called but he is absent without intimation. ADPP for the state is present. Today case is fixed for report u/s 87 & 88 Cr.P.C. SHO of P.S Shahdadpur submitted report of proclamation u/s 87 Cr.P.C through process server SIP Ali Nawaz. Order on it. Statement of process server SIP Ali Nawaz is recorded at Ex. 3, he produced annexures at Ex. 3/A to Ex. 3/k. Order passed on statement of process server. Report of Mukhtiarkar is received and placed on record at Ex. 4. Heard learned ADPP for the state. The case of accused is kept on dormant file, till he is brought before the court. Surety is called absent. The bail of accused is stand cancelled and surety forfeited. Office is directed to compliance the order. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 81/2026 |
Abdul Majeed VS Hazoor Bux & Others | Rashid Ali Malik(ADVO-52490-SBC-SGR) | DDA(DDA-0001-GOV-SGR) | Civil appeal called. Appellant is called absent and his counsel is present. Respondents are called absent. Matter is fixed for service. Notice not issued against respondents due to non deposit of costs. In the larger interest of justice. Repeat notice to all respondent through Bailiff, Registered post A.D and TCS on costs of appellant. Put off to:16-10-2026 for service upon respondents. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Hearing of Applications | |||||||
| 2 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 30/2021 |
Mst Sher Bano VS Muhammad Hussain & Others | Ameer Hussain (ADVO-322-SBC-SGR) | Applications u/s 12 Rule 2 CPC r/w u/o 41 Rule 21 CPC & section 151-CPC, Application u/s 12 Rule 2 CPC r/w u/o 1 Rule 10 CPC and section 151- CPC and stay application called. Applicant is present and his counsel is called absent. Respondent Mst. Sher Bano and her counsel is present. Mr. Shahid Khan advocate for respondent namely Muhammad Ali are present. Matter is fixed for hearing on the point of maintainability as the appeal is pending before the Honourable High Court. Applicant do not press the Applications u/s 12 Rule 2 CPC r/w u/o 41 Rule 21 CPC & section 151-CPC, Application u/s 12 Rule 2 CPC r/w u/o 1 Rule 10 CPC and section 151- CPC and stay application called. Applicant also submitted application for withdrawal of applications u/s XII rule 2 CPC on the basis of compromises and learned counsel for respondent raised no objection. Order passed on it and announced in open. Applications are dismissed as withdrawn alongwith all other applications. R & Ps of Civil Suit No.108/2017 Mst. Sher Bano VS Muhammad Hussin be sent to learned trial Court. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 3 | S. Ex. (Summary Executions) 8/2025 |
Dawood VS Shehzad Banaras | Sajjad Ali (ADVO-6506-SBC-HYD) | Mumtaz Ali(ADVO-301-SBC-SGR) | Execution application called. Plaintiff/Decree holder and his counsel is present. Defendant/Judgment debtor is called absent. Advocate for Defendant/Judgment debtor also called absent. Matter is fixed for Arguments. Heard Arguments. Order passed and announced in open court. Summary Execution application is allowed. The decree holder is directed to produce the schedule of property of J.D on next date of hearing. Put off to 16.10.2026 for compliance. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Judgment | |||||||
| 4 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 23/2026 |
Muhammad Moosa VS Province of Sindh & Others | Asif Ali(ADVO-52491-SBC-MPK) | DDA(DDA-0001-GOV-SGR),Ghulam Mustafa(ADVO-371-SBC-SGR) | Civil Appeal U/S 96 CPC called. Appellant together with his counsel is present. Today DDA is called absent and he was argued the matter. learned counsel for respondent No.10 is present. Today Civil appeal fixed for Judgment. The instant Civil Appeal is allowed. The impugned order dated 05.01.2026 passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Shahdadpur in F.C. Suit No. 101 of 2024 is hereby set aside. Consequently, F.C. Suit No. 101 of 2024 is restored to its original position and number. The learned trial court is directed to proceed with the suit on merits, direct the defendants to file their written statements (if not already filed), frame relevant issues (including maintainability/jurisdiction as specific issues, if warranted), record evidence of both sides, and decide the controversy strictly in accordance with law after affording full and fair opportunity of hearing to all parties. ??There shall be no order as to costs. Copy of this judgment/order along with the trial court record be sent back immediately to the learned Senior Civil Judge, Shahdadpur for compliance. |
||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Succession Miscellaneous Applications | |||||||
| 1 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 32/2026 | Mst Nighat VS Imran Khan & others | Ahmed Ali(ADVO-278-SBC-SGR) | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-372,SUCCESSION ACT 1925-Matter | SMA called. Applicant is called absent and her learned counsel is present. Opponents called absent. Matter is fixed for hearing. Heard Arguments. Order passed and announced in open court. The instant Succession Application No. 32 of 2026 is DISMISSED as not maintainable within the summary jurisdiction of Section 373 of the Succession Act, 1925. The applicant is at liberty to institute a regular Administration Suit under Order XX, Rule 13 CPC before the court of competent civil jurisdiction for proper determination, accounting, and distribution of the estate left behind by the deceased. File be consigned to the Record Room after completing all necessary procedural formalities. |
||
| 2 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 62/2026 | Sht Jai Shiri VS Gulab & Others | Sanjay Kumar(ADVO-539-SBC-SGR) | DDA(DDA-0001-GOV-SGR) | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-376,SUCCESSION ACT 1925-Matter | Succession Application called. Applicant is called absent and her counsel is present. Opponents are called absent. Heard Arguments. Order passed and announced in open court. The instant application under Section 376 of the Succession Act, 1925 is partially allowed as under: Let the original Succession Certificate dated 18-03-2026 be extended/endorsed to include the approved insurance claim amount of Rs. 2,776,985/- (Rupees Twenty-Seven Lacs Seventy-Six Thousand Nine Hundred & Eighty-Five Only) under Policy Nos. 607145282-3 and 607101671-0, upon furnishing enhanced/additional PR Bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Office Accountant. The Accountant of District & Sessions Court, Sanghar/Shahdadpur shall collect the aforesaid amount from State Life Insurance Corporation and disburse the share of the major legal heir(s) in accordance with law. The statutory shares of minor legal heirs (Opponents Nos. 2 to 4) shall be deposited in a profitable government investment scheme (National Savings Scheme) and shall be handed over to them upon attaining majority after proper identification, in terms of order dated 18-03-2026. So far as repudiated Policy Nos. 671061906-7 and 671070424-4 are concerned, the application stands disposed of with liberty to the applicant to seek remedy before the competent Insurance Tribunal or Civil Court. |
|