| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Report | |||||||
| 1 | Illegal Dispos. Act (Illegal Dispossesion Act) 35/2026 | Shoukat Ali VS Noor Muhammad & Others | Mahboob Ali(ADVO-6523-SBC-HYD) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-SGR) | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3 | / |
Complaint u/s 3 & 4 of illegal dispossession Act called. Applicant is called absent and his advocate is present. Matter is fixed for reports. Mukhtiarkar Shahdadpur and SHO of P.S Shahdadpur submitted separate applications for grant of time. Order thereon. Matter is adjourned. Mukhtiarkar Shahdadpur and SHO of P.S Shahdadpur are directed to submit reports on next date of hearing. Put off to 09-10-2026 for reports. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 2 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 1341/2026 | Suleman VS The State | Shabir Hussain Umrani() | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-SGR),Sanjay Kumar(ADVO-539-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-498 | 72/2026 Shahpur Chakar |
ABA called. Applicant/Accused persons namely Sulleman, Abid Ali, Asghar Ali, Roshan Ali, Ghaffar, Jabbar and Nadeem are present on ad interim pre arrest bail. Learned ADPP for the state and learned counsel for accused is called absent. Complainant and his advocate is present. In the larger interest of justice Bail Application is adjourned. Put off to 28-09-2026 for hearing. Accused are directed to attend. |
| 3 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 1391/2026 | Yasir VS The State | Iftikhar Hussain Tareen(ADVO-659-SBC-SGR) | Fayaz Hussain(ADVO-536-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-498 | 314/2026 Shahdadpur |
ABA called. Applicant/Accused persons namely Yasir is present on ad interim pre arrest bail. ADPP for the state, advocate for applicant/accused is present. Complainant is called absent. Mr.. Ghulam Ali Talpur advocate for complainant is present. Heard Arguments. Order passed and announced in open court. The interim pre-arrest bail already granted to applicant/accused Yasir is hereby CONFIRMED on the same terms and conditions, including the surety already furnished, subject to his appearance before the learned trial Court on each and every date of hearing unless exempted in accordance with law. |
| 4 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 1416/2026 | Shah Bux @ Bakshan VS The State | Fareed Khan (ADVO-51698-SBC-KHS) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-498 | 254/2026 Shahdadpur |
ABA called. Applicant/Accused persons namely SHah Bux is on ad interim pre arrest bail, but today he is called absent. ADPP for the state, advocate for applicant/accused is present. Complainant is called absent. learned advocate for applicant do not press the application. Heard Arguments. Order passed and announced in open court. Bail application is dismissed as not pressed. The interim pre-arrest bail already granted to applicants/accused Shah Bux alias Bakhshan , is hereby RECALLED. His interim bail shall stand vacated. |
| 5 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 1429/2026 | Dilsher VS The State | Faheem Ali (ADVO-698-SBC-SGR) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-498 | 319/2026 Shahdadpur |
ABA called. Applicant/Accused namely Dilsher is present on ad interim pre arrest bail. ADPP for the state, advocate for applicant/accused is present. Complainant is called absent. Heard Arguments. Order passed and announced in open court. The interim pre-arrest bail already granted to applicant/accused Dilsher is hereby CONFIRMED on the same terms and conditions, including the surety already furnished, subject to his appearance before the learned trial Court on each and every date of hearing unless exempted in accordance with law. |
| 6 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 1428/2026 | Dil Sher VS The State | Faheem Ali (ADVO-698-SBC-SGR) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-498 | 318/2026 Shahdadpur |
ABA called. Applicant/Accused namely Dilsher is present on ad interim pre arrest bail. ADPP for the state, advocate for applicant/accused is present. Complainant is called absent. Heard Arguments. Order passed and announced in open court. The interim pre-arrest bail already granted to applicant/accused Dilsher is hereby CONFIRMED on the same terms and conditions, including the surety already furnished, subject to his appearance before the learned trial Court on each and every date of hearing unless exempted in accordance with law. |
| 7 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 1427/2026 | Inam VS The State | Faheem Ali (ADVO-698-SBC-SGR) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-498 | 317/2026 Shahdadpur |
ABA called. Applicant/Accused persons namely Inam is present on ad interim pre arrest bail. ADPP for the state, advocate for applicant/accused is present. Complainant is called absent. Heard Arguments. Order passed and announced in open court. The interim pre-arrest bail already granted to applicant/accused Inam Thaheem is hereby CONFIRMED on the same terms and conditions, including the surety already furnished, subject to his appearance before the learned trial Court on each and every date of hearing unless exempted in accordance with law. |
| 8 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 1438/2026 | Urs & others VS The State | Faheem Ali (ADVO-698-SBC-SGR) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-498 | 319/2026 Shahdadpur |
ABA called. Applicant/Accused persons namely Uris, Wali Muhammad and Dilber are present on ad interim pre arrest bail. ADPP for the state, advocate for applicant/accused is present and filed condonation application. Order on it. One Azmat Ali stood surety of applicant/accused Uris and Wali Muhammad, separately. Order there on. Complainant is called absent. Heard Arguments. Order passed and announced in open court. The interim pre-arrest bail already granted to applicant/accused Uris, Wali Muhammad and Dilber are hereby CONFIRMED on the same terms and conditions, including the surety already furnished, subject to his appearance before the learned trial Court on each and every date of hearing unless exempted in accordance with law. |
| 9 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 1446/2026 | Muhammad Rafique VS The State | Faheem Ali (ADVO-698-SBC-SGR) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-498 | 315/2026 Shahdadpur |
ABA called. Applicant/Accused persons namely Muhammad Rafique is present on ad interim pre arrest bail. ADPP for the state, advocate for applicant/accused is present. Complainant is called absent. Heard Arguments. Order passed and announced in open court. The interim pre-arrest bail already granted to applicant/accused Muhammad Rafique is hereby CONFIRMED on the same terms and conditions, including the surety already furnished, subject to his appearance before the learned trial Court on each and every date of hearing unless exempted in accordance with law. |
| 10 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 1440/2026 | Sajjad VS The State | Faheem Ali (ADVO-698-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-498 | 317/2026 Shahdadpur |
ABA called. Applicant/Accused persons namely Sajjad is present on ad interim pre arrest bail. ADPP for the state, advocate for applicant/accused is present. Complainant is called absent. Heard Arguments. Order passed and announced in open court. The interim pre-arrest bail already granted to applicant/accused Sajjad is hereby CONFIRMED on the same terms and conditions, including the surety already furnished, subject to his appearance before the learned trial Court on each and every date of hearing unless exempted in accordance with law. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Hearing | |||||||
| 11 | Illegal Dispos. Act (Illegal Dispossesion Act) 24/2026 | Fayaz Ahmed VS Ameer Ali & others | Zainul Abideen(ADVO-222-SBC-SGR) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3 | / |
I.D complaint called. Applicant and his learned counsel are present. DSP Shahdadpur already submitted his report. Matter is fixed for hearing on report of DSP. Heard Arguments. Order passed and announced in open court. Register the case against accused and issue B.W against accused in the sum of Rs. 30,000/- with P.R bond in the like amount through SHO of P.S Lundo. Case is adjourned. Put off to 10-10-2026, for service. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 12 | PPC 436/2020 | The State VS Ali Akbar & Others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Mazhar Ali(ADVO-478-SBC-SGR) | PPC-334,PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-Fi,PPC-34,PPC-504 | 53/2020 Shahpur Chakar |
Sessions case called. Accused Ali Akbar, Allah Dino and Mashooque are present on bail. ADPP for the state is present. Advocate for accused is present. Case is fixed for evidence. Complainant Allah Bux, P.W Dhani Bux, Abdul Jabbar, Abid Ali and I.O Inspector Iftikhar Ali are present and no other P.Ws are present. Deposition of Complainant Allah Bux is recorded at Ex. 25. Deposition of P.W Dhani Bux is recorded at Ex. 26. Deposition of I.O Inspector Iftikhar Ali is recorded at Ex. 27, Deposition of P.W/injured Abdul Jabbar is recorded at Ex. 28. Deposiion of P.W/Mashir Abid Ali is recorded at Ex. 29. No other P.Ws are present. In the larger interest of justice case is adjourned. Issue B.W against P.W HC Rasool Bux and SIP Misri Khan through SHO of P.S Shahpur Chakar as well as through incharge process cell Shahdadpur. Call for case property. Put off to: 01.10.2026. Present accused are directed to attend. |
| 13 | Hd.T. (Hudood Trial) 204/2021 | The State VS Abdul Razaque alias Razoo and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Shabir Hussain Umrani() | Hudood Ordinances-17/3 | 54/2012 Sarhari |
Sessions case called. Accused Abdul Razak @ Razo and Mehboob Ali are present on bail, while co accused Abbas, Shabeer, Gul Hassan, Asghar and Noor Din had already declared as P.O. ADPP for the state, Learned counsel for accused is called absent. Complainant is called absent. No P.Ws are present. In the larger interest of justice matter is adjourned due to technical problem for not contacted to learned C.J Mr. Shafique Ahmed Kharal for recording his evidence through video link. Put off to 03.10.2026 for evidence of Mr. Shafeeque Ahmed, Civil Judge. Present accused are directed to attend. |
| 14 | SC (Murder Trial) 263/2022 | The State VS Kareem Bux @ Saleh & Others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Hyder Ali Zardari(ADVO-751-SBC-SGR) | PPC-114,PPC-302,PPC-311,PPC-34 | 12/2022 Sarhari |
Sessions case called. Accused Karim Bux @ Saleh is present on bail, while co-accused Sajjan, Talib and Shah Nawaz @ Shano had declared as P.O. ADPP for the state & learned counsel for accused are present. Witness is present and no PWs are present. B.W issued against P.Ws and same is returned as per endorsement of process server. Order passed on it. learned advocate for accused filed adjournment application. Order on it. In the larger interest of justice case is adjourned. Issue NBW against complainant through SHO of P.S Sarhari and repeat B.W upon remaining all required PWs and call for case property. Put off to 01-10-2026 for evidence. Present Accused is directed. |
| 15 | SC (Murder Trial) 261/2023 | The State VS Jam Ali and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR),Zainul Abideen(ADVO-222-SBC-SGR) | Shabir Hussain Umrani() | PPC-302,PPC-324,PPC-337-H,PPC-34,PPC-504 | 195/2022 Shahdadpur |
Sessions case called. Accused Muhammad Khan is present on bail. Co-accused Ali Hyder is produced from Superintendent District Prison & Correctional Facility Sanghar through video link. Accused Jaam Ali has been died and proceeding against him is already abated, while co- accused Nizam had declared as P.O. ADPP for the State is present. Defense counsel for the accused is called absent. Advocate for complainant is present. Case is fixed for evidence. No P.Ws are present. B.W issued against P.Ws and same is returned un-served as per endorsement of process server. Order on it. In the larger interest of justice case is adjourned. Issue letter to DIGP, Shaheed Benazirabad for procure the attendance of ASI Abdul Wahab and issue letter to SSP, Sanghar to procure the attendance of ASI Tanveer Hussain. Issue summons against SIP Ghulam Hyder Channar. Put off to 02-10-2026, for evidence. Jail authority is directed to produce the Co-accused Ali Hyder on next date of hearing through video link. Accused Muhammad Khan is directed to attend. |
| 16 | PPC 337/2023 | The State VS Muhammad Ali | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Muhammad Tahir(ADVO-638-SBC-MKS) | PPC-295-B | 27/2023 Shahpur Chakar |
Sessions case called. Accused Muhammad Ali is admitted at Sir.C.J. Institute of Psychiatry & B.S Hyderabad, such report is on 16-09-2026. ADPP for the State is present. Junior of advocate for accused is present. Heard Arguments. Order passed and announced in open court. The proceeding is hereby postpone U/S 465 Cr.P.C till further orders, under directions to Medical Superintendent and Superintendent of Central Prison Hyderabad to keep sending the current status/condition of the accused to this court on monthly basis and produce him before this court if he becomes capable to understand the court proceedings or to face the trial, as provided U/S 473 Cr.P.C on which the trial will be resumed against the accused. Let copy of this order be separately sent to M.S, Sir C.J Institute of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Hyderabad and Superintendent of Central Prison Hyderabad for information and compliance accordingly. |
| 17 | PPC 238/2024 | The State VS Muharam Ali and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR),Mir Najeebullah Khan Jadoon(ADVO-443-SBC-SGR) | Muhammad Tahir(ADVO-638-SBC-MKS),Niaz Ahmed(ADVO-5198-SBC-HYD),Shabir Hussain Umrani() | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-324,PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-Fi,PPC-337-L,PPC-406,PPC-427,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | 28/2022 Lundo |
Sessions case called. Accused persons namely , Faiz, Kamran Ali, Hubdar, Mehar @ Mehaar, Sammar son of Zulifqar, Shahid Hussain, Khalid Hussain, Altaf, Sajjad, Kashmir, Inam Ali, Husain Bux, Rizwan Hussain, Sammar Abass, Waheed Ali, Sikandar, Jan Muhammad, Dildar Ali and Zahid Hussain are present on bail. While co-accused Shan, Ali Jan, Mehtab, Abid Ali, Zaffar Ali, Ameer Bux @Ameer Ali, Fahad Khan and Majid ALi are on bail, but today they called absent without intimation. While accused persons namely Imdad and Shafique have already been died and case proceedings against both accused persons are hereby abated. While remaining accused persons namely Muhram ALi, Baboo alias Aftab, Niaz Hussain, Ahsan, Mushtaque, Ahmed ALi, and Pervaiz have already been declared as proclaimed offender. ADPP for the state is present. Junior of learned Advocate for accused is present. Advocate for complainant is present. Case is fixed for evidence. Complainant and witness are present. Summons issued against P.Ws and same is returned as per report. Order on it. Case is adjourned due to absence of accused persons. Issue NBW against accused persons namely Shan, Ali Jan, Mehtab, Abid Ali, Zaffar Ali, Ameer Bux @Ameer Ali, Fahad Khan and Majid ALi and notice to their sureties through SHO of P.S Lundo . Repeat summon upon all remaining private PWs. Issue letter to SHO of P.S Lundo to produce the case property on next date of hearing. Put off to: 13.10.2026 for evidence. All Present accused are directed to attend on next date of hearing. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 491 | |||||||
| 18 | Application u/s 491 CrPc 266/2026 | Sahib Zadi VS SHO PS Shahdadpur | Jameel Ahmed(ADVO-728-SBC-SGR) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-491 | / |
Habus corpus application u/s 419-Cr.P.C called. Applicant and her counsel are present. Opponent is present. SHO of P.S Shahdadpur produce the detaine minor Muhammad Salar and submit report through ASI Faryad Ahmed. Order on it. Heard Arguments. Order passed and announced in open court. Application is allowed and minor is handed over to applicant. Respondent if aggrieved may approach proper forum. |
| 19 | Application u/s 491 CrPc 269/2026 | Sht. Jamna VS SSP Sanghar & Others | Mehnaz (ADVO-604-SBC-SGR) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-491 | / |
Habus corpus application u/s 419-Cr.P.C called. Applicant and her counsel are present. Opponent and detainee are present. SHO of P.S Sarhari and produce the detainees. Mr. Shahid Khan advocate appeared and filed his vakalatnama on behalf of opponent. Order on it. Learned advocate for opponent filed statement. Order on it. learned advocate for applicant do not press the application. Heard Arguments. Order passed and announced in on court. Application is dismissed as not pressed. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 20 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 2098/2026 | Ilahi Bux VS SSP Sanghar & Others | Rab Dino(ADVO-648-SBC-SGR) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-22-A | / |
Cr. Misc. Application U/S 22-A Cr.P.C called. Applicant and his counsel are present. Respondent is called absent. Heard Arguments. Order passed and announced in open court. Application is allowed and thereby SHO of P.S Shahdadpur is hereby directed to record the statement of applicant if he disclose the cognizance offence then lodge FIR, otherwise non-cognizance submit report to learned Magistrate. |
| 21 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 2109/2026 | Mst Bashiran VS SSP Sanghar & Others | Hasnain(ADVO-510-SBC-SGR) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-22-A | / |
Cr. Misc. Application U/S 22-A 6 (iii) Cr.P.C called. Applicant and his learned counsel are present. Respondent/proposed accused are called absent. Police reports are already received from complaint cell and SHO of P.S Shahdadpur. Heard Arguments. Order passed and announced in open court. Application is disposed of. The protection is hereby allowed to applicant. SHO concerned is directed to provide legal protection to applicant and bound to respondents not to haras applicant without due course of law and submit such report within 7 days. Applicant is at liberty to avail proper remedy. |
| 22 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 2124/2026 | Muhammad Sajan VS SSP Sanghar & Others | Yasir Ali (ADVO-1168-SBC-NWB) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-22-A | / |
Cr. Misc. Application U/S 22-A 6 (iii) Cr.P.C called. Applicant and his learned counsel are present. Respondent/proposed accused is present and his advocate is called absent. Mr. Hyder Ali advocate appeared and filed his power on behalf of respondent/proposed accused Hubdar. Order on it. Police reports are already received from complaint cell and SHO of P.S Shahdadpur. Heard Arguments. Order passed and announced in open court. Application is disposed of. The protection is hereby allowed to applicant. SHO concerned is directed to provide legal protection to applicant and bound to respondents not to haras applicant without due course of law and submit such report within 7 days. |
| 23 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 2193/2026 | Mubarak Ali VS The Deputy Inspector General of Police Shaheed Benazirabad & Others | Muhammad Tahir Yaseen(ADVO-398-SBC-SGR) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-22 A (6-II) | / |
Cr. Misc. Application U/S 22-A & B 6 (ii) Cr.P.C called. Applicant and his counsel are present. Respondent ASI Ghulam Nabi is present. Notice issued against respondent/accused and same is returned as per report. Report are received from complaint cell and SHO of P.S Shahdadpur. Order on it. Heard Arguments. Order passed and announced in open court. Application is allowed. SSP Sanghar is directed to transfer the investigation of this case to some other impartial officer not below the rank of Sub-Inspector and submit such report within 7 days. |
| 24 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 2218/2026 | Halan Micro Finance Limited VS SSP Sanghar & Others | Nizam Ali(ADVO-23604-SBC-KHS) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-22-A | / |
Cr. Misc. Application U/S 22-A & B 6 Cr.P.C called. Applicant through his authorised person namely Amir Hassan Tunio and his counsel are present. Respondent is called absent. Notice issued against respondent/accused and same is returned as per report. Report are received from complaint cell and SHO of P.S Shahdadpur. Order on it. Heard Arguments. Order passed and announced in open court. Application is allowed and thereby SHO of P.S Shahdadpur is hereby directed to record the statement of applicant if he disclose the cognizance offence then lodge FIR, otherwise non-cognizance, submit N.C report to learned Magistrate. |
| 25 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 2215/2026 | Mst Rehmat VS SSP Sanghar & Others | Waheed Ali(ADVO-50964-SBC-KHC) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-22-A | / |
Cr. Misc. Application U/S 22-A 6 (iii) Cr.P.C called. Applicant and his learned counsel are present. Respondent/proposed accused are called absent. Police reports are received from complaint cell and SHO of P.S concerned . Heard Arguments. Order passed and announced in open court. Application is disposed of as per order. The protection is hereby allowed to applicant. SHO concerned is directed to provide legal protection to applicant and bound to respondents not to haras applicant without due course of law and submit such report within 7 days. The applicant at liberty to approach proper forum. |
| 26 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 2224/2026 | Ali Gohar VS SSP Sanghar & Others | Shahid Khan(ADVO-343-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-22-A | / |
Cr. Misc. Application U/S 22-A 6 (iii) Cr.P.C called. Applicant and his learned counsel are present. Respondent/proposed accused are present. Mr. Ayaz Gul advocate appeared and filed his vakalatnama on behalf of respondents/proposed accused persons. Order on it. Police reports are received from complaint cell and SHO of P.S Shahdadpur. Heard Arguments. Order passed and announced in open court. Application is disposed of. The protection is hereby allowed to applicant. SHO concerned is directed to provide legal protection to applicant and bound to respondents not to haras applicant without due course of law and submit such report within 7 days. |
|
| 27 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 2233/2026 | Nawaz Ali VS SSP Sanghar & Others | Shabir Hussain Umrani() | Cr.PC-22-A | / |
Cr. Misc. Application U/S 22-A 6 (iii) Cr.P.C called. Applicant and his learned counsel are present. Respondent/proposed accused are present. Mr. Zulifqar Ali advocate appeared and filed vakalatnama on behalf of respondent/proposed accused persons. Order n it. Police reports are received from complaint cell and SHO of P.S Shahdadpur. Heard Arguments. Order passed and announced in open court. Application is disposed of. The protection is hereby allowed to applicant. SHO concerned is directed to provide legal protection to applicant and bound to respondents not to haras applicant without due course of law and submit such report within 7 days. Applicant may approach to proper forum. |
|
| 28 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 2234/2026 | Danish VS SSP Sanghar & Others | Fareed Khan (ADVO-51698-SBC-KHS) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-22-A | / |
Cr. Misc. Application U/S 22-A 6 (i) Cr.P.C called. Applicant and his learned counsel are called absent. Propose accused persons are called absent. Police reports are received. Order passed and announced in open court. Application is dismissed in non prosecution. |
| 29 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 2229/2026 | Punhoon VS SSP Sanghar & Others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-22-A | / |
Cr. Misc. Application U/S 22-A 6 (i) Cr.P.C called. Applicant and his learned counsel are present. Propose accused persons are called absent. Police reports are received. learned advocate for applicant filed statement for withdrawal of the application. Order passed and announced in open court. Application is dismissed as withdrawn. |
|
| 30 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 2239/2026 | Liaquat Ali VS SSP Sanghar & Others | Waheed Ali(ADVO-50964-SBC-KHC) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-22-A | / |
Cr. Misc. Application U/S 22-A 6 (iii) Cr.P.C called. Applicant and his learned counsel are present. Respondent/proposed accused is present. Police reports are already received from complaint cell and SHO concerned. Heard Arguments. Order passed and announced in open court. Application is disposed of as per order. The protection is hereby allowed to applicant. SHO concerned is directed to provide legal protection to applicant and bound to respondents not to haras applicant without due course of law and submit such report within 7 days. |
| 31 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 2238/2026 | Ali Haider VS SSP Sanghar & Others | Asif Ali(ADVO-52491-SBC-MPK) | Cr.PC-22-A | / |
Cr. Misc. Application U/S 22-A & B Cr.P.C called. Applicant and his learned counsel are present. Respondent/proposed accused are called absent. Police reports are received from complaint cell and SHO concerned. Heard Arguments. Order passed and announced in open court. Application is disposed of. The protection is hereby allowed to applicant. SHO concerned is directed to provide legal protection to applicant and bound to respondents not to haras applicant without due course of law and submit such report within 7 days. |
|
| 32 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 2240/2026 | Naeem Akhtar VS SSP Sanghar & Others | Muhammad Imran(ADVO-303-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-22-A | / |
Cr. Misc. Application U/S 22-A 6 (iii) Cr.P.C called. Applicant and his learned counsel are present. Respondent/proposed accused are called absent. Police reports are received from complaint cell and SHO of P.S Shahdadpur. Heard Arguments. Order passed and announced in open court. Application is disposed of. The protection is hereby allowed to applicant. SHO concerned is directed to provide legal protection to applicant and bound to respondents not to haras applicant without due course of law and submit such report within 7 days. |
|
| 33 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 2237/2026 | Waqar Hussain VS SSP Sanghar & Others | Waheed Ali(ADVO-50964-SBC-KHC) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-22-A | / |
Cr. Misc. Application U/S 22-A (iii) Cr.P.C called. Applicant and his learned counsel are present. Respondent/proposed accused is present. Police reports are received from complaint cell and SHO concerned. Heard Arguments. Order passed and announced in open court. Application is disposed of. The protection is hereby allowed to applicant. SHO concerned is directed to provide legal protection to applicant and bound to respondents not to haras applicant without due course of law and submit such report within 7 days. Applicant is at liberty to avail proper remedy. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 34 | PPC 386/2026 | The State VS Muhammad Yousif @ Misri and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | PPC-324 | 122/2026 Shahdadpur |
Sessions Case called. Accsued Muhammad Yousif, Arbab Ali Manthar, are present on bail. Learned ADPP for the State & Learned Counsel for accused are present. The case is fixed for charge. Today charge has been framed upon accused persons at..........Ex. 02. Plea of accused are recorded at..Ex. 3 to 6, under which accused have denied all the prosecution allegations and not pleaded guilty they have claimed for trial. No P.Ws are present. Case is adjourned. Issue summons upon all required pws and call for case property if any . Put off to 14. 10.2026 For Evidence . Accused are directed to attend. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Statement of Accused | |||||||
| 35 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 219/2025 | The State VS Akhtar Ali | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Amjad Ali (ADVO-51194-SBC-HYD) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 20/2025 Shahdadpur |
Session case called. Accused Akhtar Ali is produced in custody by Superintendent District Prison & Correctional Facility Sanghar. ADPP for the state & learned counsel for accused are present. Case is fixed for statement of accused. Statement of accused u/s 342-Cr.P.C is recorded at Ex. 11. Accused neither examined himself on oath nor led defence evidence. Case is adjourned. Put off to 05-10-2026 for Final Arguments. Jail authority is directed to produce the accused on next date of hearing through video link. |
| 36 | PPC 214/2025 | The State VS Moula Bux and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Hasnain(ADVO-510-SBC-SGR),Rashid Ali (ADVO-851-SBC-SGR) | PPC-395 | 16/2025 Shahdadpur |
Session case called. Accused Akhtar Ali is produced in custody from Superintendent District Prison & Correctional Facility Sanghar through video link, while accused Moula Bux and Azhar u Din are present on bail. Co accused Mian Bux, Iqbal and Khan Muhammad have already declared as P.O. ADPP for the state and Advocate for accused Moula Bux is present. All the learned advocate for accused persons are present. The case is fixed for statement of accused. The statement of accused persons namely Moula Bux, Akhter Ali and Azharuddin are recorded at Ex. 18 to 20. All the accused persons neither examined themselves on oath nor led defence evidence. In the larger interest of justice case is adjourned. Put off 05-10-2026 for Final Arguments. Jail authority is directed to produce the accused Akhtar on next date of hearing through video link. Present accused are directed to attend. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | S. Ex. (Summary Executions) 6/2025 |
Ashok Kumar VS Kamran Hussain | Nadeem Ahmed(ADVO-427-SBC-SGR) | Execution Application called. Plaintiff/Decree holder and his counsel is present. Judgment debtor/defendant is called absent. Matter is fixed for service. Learned advocate for decree holder already filed application u/s 5 rule 20 CPC. Heard Arguments. Order passed on application u/s 5 Rule 20 CPC. Allowed in daily news papers Awami Awaz on costs of decree holder. Repeat notice to J.D through court bailiff as well as through registered post A/D and TCS on costs of applicant. In the interest of larger justice Execution application adjourned to 10.10.2026 For service. |
|||
| 2 | S. Ex. (Summary Executions) 5/2025 |
Ashok Kumar VS Irshad Hussain | Farman Ali(ADVO-50409-SBC-SGR) | Execution Application called. Plaintiff/Decree holder and his counsel is present. Judgment debtor/defendant is called absent. Matter is fixed for service. Learned advocate for decree holder already filed application u/s 5 rule 20 CPC. Heard Arguments. Order passed on application u/s 5 Rule 20 CPC. Allowed in daily news papers Awami Awaz on costs of decree holder. Repeat notice to J.D through court bailiff as well as through registered post A/D and TCS on costs of applicant. In the interest of larger justice Execution application adjourned to 10.10.2026 For service. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION Advocate to be Heard | |||||||
| 3 | C.Rev. (Civil Revisions) 30/2026 |
Bhagwan Das & Others VS Moula Bux & Others | Rana Waqar Ul Hasnain(ADVO-866-SBC-SGR) | Civil Revision called. Applicants and their advocate is called absent. Matter is fixed for advocate to be heard. Mr. Mirza Fawad Saleem Baig appeared and filed his vakalatnama on behalf of respondent NO.4 and also filed adjournment application. Order thereon. Matter is adjourned. Pt off to 15-10-2026 for advocate to be heard. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 4 | S. Ex. (Summary Executions) 7/2025 |
Kashif Ali VS Mazhar Ali | Shahid Khan(ADVO-343-SBC-SGR) | Execution Application called. Plaintiff/Decree Holder is called absent and his learned counsel is present. Neither Judgment debtor/defendant nor his counsel is present. Matter is fixed for Objections. Order passed on order sheet. The defendant/judgment debtor is hereby debarred from filling of objection. Matter is adjourned. Put off to 09.10.2026 for Arguments. |
|||
| 5 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 18/2026 |
Asif Khurshid Since dead through his LRs VS Muneer Ahmed & Others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-SGR) | Civil Appeal called. Appellant and their attorney is called absent. learned counsel for appellant is present. Respondents No. 5 and 15 are present. Remain respondents are called absent. Matter is fixed for service upon respondents No. 1 to 4 and 16 to 19 and for objection of Respondent Nos. 5,15, 40 and 41. Process not issued against respondents. Mr. Sanjay Kumar advocate appeared and filed his vakalatnama on behalf of respondent No. 5 to 15 Order on it. Learned counsel for respondent filed adjournment application. Order on it. In the larger interest of justice matter is adjourned. Issue notices upon respondents No. 1 to 4 and 16 to 19 through all modes. Put off to 13.10.2026 for service and objections by respondent No.05, No.15 & respondent No.40 and 41. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 6 | Summary Suits 30/2026 |
Fida Hussain VS Amanat Ali | Shabir Hussain Umrani() | DDA(DDA-0001-GOV-SGR) | Summary suit called. Plaintiff and his counsel ae called absent. Defendant is present. Today summary suit fixed for service. Mr. Aghar Iftikhar advocate appeared and filed his vakalatnama on behalf of defendant at Ex. 4 and also filed adjournment application. Order thereon. In the larger interest of justice instant Summary Suit is adjourned to 03-10-2026, for filling of application of leave to defence. |
||