ABA called. Applicants/Accused persons namely Muzafar alias Chachu and Salman alias S.K are present on ad interim pre arrest bail. ADPP for the state, advocate for applicants/accused is present. Heard Arguments. Order passed and announced in open court. The interim pre-arrest bail already granted to applicants/accused persons namely Muafar alias Chachu and Salman @ S.K is hereby CONFIRMED on the same terms and conditions, including the surety already furnished, subject to his appearance before the learned trial Court on each and every date of hearing unless exempted in accordance with law.

ABA called. Applicants/Accused persons namely Muzafar alias Chachu and Salman alias S.K are present on ad interim pre arrest bail. ADPP for the state, advocate for applicants/accused is present. Heard Arguments. Order passed and announced in open court. The interim pre-arrest bail already granted to applicants/accused persons namely Muafar alias Chachu and Salman @ S.K is hereby CONFIRMED on the same terms and conditions, including the surety already furnished, subject to his appearance before the learned trial Court on each and every date of hearing unless exempted in accordance with law.

ABA called. Applicant/Accused Salman alias S.K is present on ad interim pre arrest bail. ADPP for the state, advocate for applicant/accused is present. Heard Arguments. Order passed and announced in open court. The interim pre-arrest bail already granted to applicant/accused Salman @ S.K is hereby CONFIRMED on the same terms and conditions, including the surety already furnished, subject to his appearance before the learned trial Court on each and every date of hearing unless exempted in accordance with law.

Sessions case called. Accused Chettan is produced by Superintendent District Prison & Correctional Facility Sanghar. ADPP for the state is present. Counsel for accused is present. Case is fixed for evidence and hearing on application 540-Cr.P.C. Copy suplied to learned advocate for the accused. Heard Arguments on application u/s 540-Cr.P.C and order passed and announced in open court. Application u/s 540-Cr.P.C placed on record at Ex. 23. In the larger interest of justice case is adjourned. Issue summons against Dr. Akram through Director SIMS, Hospital, Shahdadpur. Put off to 13.10.2026 for evidence. Jail authority is directed to produce the accused on next date of hearing through video link.

Sessions case called. Accused Abu Bakar is produced from Superintendent District Prison & Correctional Facility Sanghar through video link. ADPP for the state and Advocate for accused is present. Advocate for Complainant is called absent. P.W Azizullah is present and no other P.W are present. Summons issued against P.Ws and same is returned un-served. Order on it. Deposition/examination in chief of P.W-2 Azizullah is recorded at Ex. 5, he produced receipt of handing over the dead body at Ex.5/A, his cross examination is reserved on filling of adjournment application by accused. Order on it. Case is adjourned. Repeat summons against all remaining required P.Ws. Case property produce by SHO of P.S Shahpur Chakar and same is returned back with direction to produce on next date of hearing. Put off to: 21.10.2026 for evidence. Jail authority is directed to produce accused on next date of hearing through video link.

Sessions case called. Accused Mehar Ali is produced by Superintendent District Prison & Correctional Facility Sanghar through video link. ADPP for the state is present. Counsel for accused is present. Today case is fixed for evidence. No P.Ws are present. Summons issued against P.Ws but same is not returned served or un-served. In the larger interest of justice case is adjourned. Repeat summons against P.Ws and call Case property. Put of to 20.10.2026 for evidence. Jail authority is directed to produce accused on the next date of hearing through video link.

Sessions case called. Accused Ghulam Jaffer is produced by Superintendent District Prison & Correctional Facility Sanghar through video link. ADPP for the state is present. Counsel for accused is present. Today case is fixed for evidence. No P.Ws are present. Summons issued against P.Ws but same is not returned served or un-served. In the larger interest of justice case is adjourned. Repeat summons against P.Ws and call Case property. Put of to 20.10.2026 for evidence. Jail authority is directed to produce accused on the next date of hearing through video link.

Sessions case called. Accused Hassan Bux is produced by Superintendent District Prison & Correctional Facility Sanghar through video link. ADPP for the state is present. Counsel for accused is present. Today case is fixed for evidence. No P.Ws are present. Summons issued against P.Ws but same is not returned served or un-served. In the larger interest of justice case is adjourned. Repeat summons against P.Ws and call Case property. Put of to 20.10.2026 for evidence. Jail authority is directed to produce accused on the next date of hearing through video link.

Sessions case called. Accused Hassan Bux, Mehar Ali, Ghulam Jaffar and Saleem are produced by Superintendent District Prison & Correctional Facility Sanghar through video link. While remaining co-accused Raham Hussain and Imam Bux have already been declared as P.O. ADPP for the state and Advocate for learned counsel for complainant is present. Counsel for accused is also present. Today case is fixed for evidence. Complainant and P.W Abdul Haq and Allah Bux are present and no other P.Ws are present. Summons issued against P.Ws and same is returned as per endorsement of process server. Deposition of P.W- 3 Abdul Haque is recorded at Ex. 13. Deposition of P.W- 4 Allah Bux is recorded at Ex. 14. No other witness is present. In the larger interest of justice case is adjourned. Jail authority is directed to produce the accused through video link on next date of hearing. Repeat summons against remaining all required P.Ws. Case property produced by SHO of P.S Sarhari and same is returned back at P.S with direction to produce on next date of hearing. Put of to 20.10.2026 for evidence. Jail authority is directed to produce the accused persons on next date of hearing through video link.

Sessions case called. Accused Shahnawaz is present on bail. ADPP for the state and counsel for accused is present. Case is fixed for evidence. Summons issued against P.Ws and same is returned as per report. Order on it. Complainant ASI Ameer Ali, P.W Muhammad Ramzan and I.O ASI Abdul Ghafoor are present and no other P.Ws are present. Deposition of P.W-1 Complainant ASI Ameer Ali is recorded at Ex. 7, he produced annexures. Deposition of P.W-2 Mashir PC Muhammad Ramzan is recorded at Ex. 8. Deposition of P.W-3 I.O ASI Abdul Ghaffar is recorded at Ex. 9, e produced annexures. No other P.Ws are present. In the larger interest of justice case is adjourned. Issue B.W against WHC Innayatullah of P.S Sarhari. The cae property produced by SHO of P.S Sarhari and same is returned back with direction to produce on next date of hearing. Put off to 16.10.2026 for evidence. Jail authority is directed to produce both the accused on next date of hearing through video link.

Sessions case called. Accused Altaf is produced in custody by superintendent District Jail, Sanghar through video link. Accused Shahnawaz is present on bail. While accused Ali Hassan is on bail, but today he is called absent. ADPP for the state and counsel for accused is present. Case is fixed for evidence. Summons issued against P.Ws and same is returned as per report. Order on it. Complainant ASI Ameer Ali, P.W Muhammad Ramzan and I.O ASI Abdul Ghafoor are present and no other P.Ws are present. learned advocate for accused filed application u/s 540-Cr.P.C regarding proceed the matter in absence of accused Ali Hassan. Order on it. Allowed. Deposition of P.W-1 Complainant ASI Ameer Ali is recorded at Ex. 17, he produced annexures. Deposition of P.W-2 Mashir pc Muhammad Ramzan is recorded at Ex. 18, he produced annexure. Deposition of P.W-3 I.O ASI Abdul Ghaffar is recorded at Ex. 19, he produced annexures. No other P.Ws are present. In the larger interest of justice case is adjourned. Issue B.W against WHC Innayatullah of P.S Sarhari. The cae property produced by SHO of P.S Sarhari and same is returned back with direction to produce on next date of hearing. Put off to 16.10.2026 for evidence. Jail authority is directed to produce the accused on next date of hearing through video link. Accused is on bail is directed to attend.

Sessions case called. Accused persons namely Nadir, Farhan and Mehtab are present on bail. While accused Taj Muhammad is on bail, but he is called absent. ADPP for the state is present. advocate for accused persons is present. Case is fixed for evidence. Complainant ASI Niaz Hussain, Mashir PC Shahbaz Ali and I.O ASI Abdul Ghafoor are present and no other P.Ws are present. Summons issued against P.Ws and same is returned as per endorsement of process server. Order on it. Learned advocate for accused Taj Muhammad filed application/intimation for excuse the absence of accused Taj Muhammad, as he was arrested an other crimes at P.S Shahpur Chakar. Order on it. File. In the interest of justice case is adjourned. Present P.Ws are bound down. Repeat summon upon remining P.Ws. Call case property. Case adjourned to 02.11.2026. For evidence. Accused present, they are directed to attend.

Sessions case called. Accused Rai Chand and Maalio are produced by Superintendent District Prison & Correctional Sanghar through video link. ADPP for the State is present and advocate for accused is also present. Learned advocate for complainant is present. Case is fixed for evidence. Complainant is present and no other P.Ws are present. Summons issued against P.Ws and same is not returned. Learned advocate for accused filed adjournment application. Order on it. In the larger interest of interest case is adjourned. Repeat summon upon all required P.Ws. Call case property. Put off to 22.10.2026 for evidence. Jail authority is directed to produce accused persons on next date of hearing through video link.

Sessions Case called. Accused Rustam alias Zafrullah is present on bail. Learned ADPP for the state is present. learned advocate for accused is present. The case is fixed for evidence. Mashir Ghulam Nabi and Ehsan Ali. Summons issued against P.Ws and same is returned as per report of process server. Learned advocate for accused requested for adjourn the case. In the larger interest of justice case is adjourned. Present P.Ws are boud down. Issue B.W against complainant ASI Abdul Aziz through IGP, Sindh Karachi and B.W against I.O ASI Fida Hussain through SSP, Sanghar. Call case property from SHO of P.S Lundo. Put off to 30.10.2026. for evidence. Accused is directed to attend.

Cr. Misc. Application U/S 22-A & B 6 (i) & (iii) Cr.P.C called. Applicant and his learned counsel are present. Respondent/proposed accused is called absent. Police reports are received from complaint cell and SHO of P.S Shahdadpur. learned advocate for applicant do not press the application. Heard Arguments. Order passed and announced in open court. Application is dismissed as not pressed.

Cr. Misc. Application U/S 22-A 6 (iii) Cr.P.C called. Applicant and his learned counsel are present. Respondent/proposed accused is called absent. Police reports are received from complaint cell and SHO of P.S Shahdadpur. Heard Arguments. Order passed and announced in open court. Application is disposed of as per order. The protection is already allowed to applicant vide order 18-8-2026. SHO concerned is directed to ensure compliance of said order and submit report within 7 days. For issue of her share applicant is at liberty to approach proper forum.

Cr. Misc. Application U/S 22-A (iii) Cr.P.C called. Applicant and his learned counsel are present. Respondent/proposed accused are present. Police reports are received from complaint cell and SHO of P.S Shahdadpur. Heard Arguments. Order passed and announced in open court. Application is disposed of as per order. The protection is hereby allowed to applicant. SHO concerned is directed to provide legal protection to applicant and bound to respondents not to haras applicant without due course of law and submit such report within 7 days.

Cr. Misc. Application U/S 22-A (iii) Cr.P.C called. Applicant and his learned counsel are present. Respondent/proposed accused is present. Mr. Riaz Ali advocate appeared and filed his vakalatnama on behalf of respondent/proposed accused. Order on it. Police reports are received from complaint cell and SHO of P.S Shahdadpur. Heard Arguments. Order passed and announced in open court. Application is disposed of as per order. The protection is hereby allowed to applicant. SHO concerned is directed to provide legal protection to applicant and bound to respondents not to haras applicant without due course of law and submit such report within 7 days.

Cr. Misc. Application U/S 22-A & B Cr.P.C called. Applicant and his learned counsel are present. Respondent/proposed accused is present. Mr. Shabbir Hussain advocate filed his vakalatnama on behalf of respondent/proposed accused. Order on it. Police reports are received from complaint cell and SHO of P.S Shahdadpur. Heard Arguments. Order passed and announced in open court. Application is disposed of as per order. The protection is hereby allowed to applicant. The prayer of FIR is declined. Applicant is at liberty to avail roper remedy.

Cr. Misc. Application U/S 22-A 6 (i) Cr.P.C called. Applicant and his learned counsel are present. Respondent/proposed accused is called absent. Police reports are received from complaint cell and SHO of P.S Shahdadpur. Heard Arguments. Order passed and announced in open court. Application is Dismissed. If there is any dispute over payment of amount applicant is at liberty to avail proper remedy.

Cr. Misc. Application U/S 22-A 6 (iii) Cr.P.C called. Applicant and his learned counsel are present. Respondent/proposed accused is present. Mr. Waheed Ali advocate appeared and filed his vakalatnama on behalf of respondent/proposed accused. Order on it. Police reports are received from complaint cell and SHO of P.S Shahdadpur. Heard Arguments. Order passed and announced in open court. Application is disposed of. The protection is hereby allowed to applicant. SHO concerned is directed to provide legal protection to applicant and bound to respondents not to haras applicant without due course of law and submit such report within 7 days. This order pertains to protect only. Respondent is at liberty to avail any remedy available to be according to law.

Case called. Accused Taj Muhammad, Tufail, Altaf Hussain, Ameer Ali, Ghulam Jaffer and Imamuddin are present on bail. learned DDPP for the State is present. Mr. Shabbir Hussain advocate filed vakalatnama on behalf of accused Taj Muhammad, Muhammad Tufail, Imamdin. Order on it. Mr. Sanjay Kumar adovcate filed his vakalatnama on behalf of accused Ataf Hussain, Ameer Ali. Order on it. No advocate for accused Ghulam Jaffer. The case is fixed for charge. Today charge has been framed upon accused persons at..........Ex. 02. Pleas of all accused are recorded at..Ex. 3 to 8, under which accused have denied all the prosecution allegations and not pleaded guilty they have claimed for trial. No P.Ws are present. Issue summons upon all required pws and call for case property . Put off to 26. 10.2026 For Evidence . Accused are directed to attend.

Summary Suit called. Plaintiff and his counsel is called absent. Defendant as yet not been served. Matter is fixed for service. Summons not issued against defendant due to non depositing of costs. In the interest of justice matter is adjourned. Repeat summons to defendants through all available modes, on costs of plaintiff. Put off to 13-10-2026 for service.

Civil Appeal called. Appellant is called absent and his counsel is present. Respondents are called absent. Matter is fixed for service. learned counsel for appellant filed statement alongwith one original receipt of registered post A/D. Summons issued against respondent and same is returned as per endorsement of bailiff of this court. Order on it. Mr. Muhammad Tahir Nizamani advocate filed his vakalatnama at Ex. 5, alogwith poto copy of special power of attorney on behalf of respondent No. 3 & 4. The service against respondent No. 3 & 4 is held good. In the larger of interest of justice matter is adjourned. Repeat Notice to respondents except responden No. 3 & 4, through all possible modes. Put off to 26.10.2026 for service.

Civil Appel called. Applicant and his learned counsel is present. Attorney namely Anwar Hussain of respondent No. 1 and his counsel is present. Respondent No. 2 Mst. Bakhtawar is present in person. DDA for the state is present on behalf of official respondent No. 5 to 10. Mr Kooro alias Sadam Khoso advocate appeared and filed his vakalatnnama on behalf of respondent No.2 Mstt. Bakhtawar at Ex. 5. learned advocate for appellant filed application uo XLI 5 red with section 151 CPC at Ex. 6, supported with affidavit appellant. Order on it. Notice to respondents. Matter is fixed for service. Summons issued against respondent through bailiff of this court and same is returned served upon respondent No. 2, 4 to 10. Order on it. Copies of the case are supplied to respondent NO.2 and DDA for the state on behalf of official respondent No. 5 to 10, while respondent No. 4 is called absent. Service against respondent No. 2, 4 to 10 is held good, such order passed on order sheet. Matter is adjourned. Repeat notice to respondents No. 3-A, 3-B and 3-C through bailiff of this court as well as all possible modes on costs of appellant. Put off to 22-10-2026 for service upon respondent No. 3-a, 3-b and 3-c and for objection of respondent No. 1,2,4 to 10 and hearing of application at Ex. 5.

Civil Appeal U/S 96 C.P.C called. Appellant is called absent and his counsel is present. Respondents are called absent. learned counsel for respondent No. 1 & 2 is present. Matter is fixed for appearance of respondent No.03 & 04 for filing of objections. The respondent No. 3 & 4 are repeatedly called but they are absent. Order passed on order sheet. The defence of respondents No. 3 & 4 is hereby debarred from filling of objection. Let the matter be fixed for Arguments. In the interest of justice matter is adjourned. Put off to 17.10.2026 for Arguments.

Summary Suit called. Plaintiff and his counsel is present. Defendant is called absent. Junior partner of learned counsel for defendant is present. Matter is for hearing of application of leave to defence. Junior of learned advocate for defendant requested for excuse the absence of his senior and adjourn the matter. In the larger interest of justice Summary Suit is adjourned to 08.10.2026 for hearing on application for leave to defend.