| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 223/2026 | Ali Sher VS The State | Shabir Hussain Umrani() | PPC-201.,PPC-302,PPC-34 | 7/2026 Darya Khan Rind @ Maqsoodo Rind |
Bail application U/S 497 CR.P.C on behalf of accused Ali Sher called. ADPP for the state and Advocate for accused are present. Complainant Abdullah and his counsel are present. Compromise talks between the both parties. In the interest of larger justice. Bail application adjourned to 30.03.2026. For further arguments. |
|
| 2 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 252/2026 | Bahwal Haq Khan VS The State | Asif Ali(ADVO-4895-SBC-HYD) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | PPC-34,PPC-467,Sindh Prohibition of Intrest on Pvt Loan Act 2023-3-(1),Sindh Prohibition of Intrest on Pvt Loan Act 2023-4,Sindh Prohibition of Intrest on Pvt Loan Act 2023-5 | 65/2026 Shahdadpur |
Bail application U/S 497 CR.P.C on behalf of accused Bahawal Haq Khan called. Advocate for accused and ADPP for the state are present. Further arguments heard for both sides. Order passed and announced in open court. Accordingly, his bail plea merits no consideration and the same stands rejected. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 3 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 51/2026 | Bashir & Another VS The State | Kashif Muneer(ADVO-382-SBC-BDN) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-498 | 79/2018 Shahpur Chakar |
Bail application U/S 498 CR.P.C called. Applicants/accused Bashir and Mukhtiar are present on ad-interim pre-arrest bail. ADPP for the state and advocate for accused are present. Complainant Mst: Waddan is present. Advocate her complainant also present. In the interest of larger justice. Bail application adjourned to 07.04.2026. For arguments on confirmation or otherwise. Applicants/accused present on interim pre-arrest bail they are directed to attend on next date of hearing. |
| 4 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 157/2026 | Muhammad Bux & another VS The State | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-498 | 189/2025 Shahdadpur |
Bail application U/S 498 CR.P.C called. Applicants/accused Muhammad Bux and Afzal @ Afzal Khan are present on ad-interim pre-arrest bail. ADPP for the state and advocate for accused are present. Complainant is present. Advocate for complainant also present and filed application for adjournment. Order passed thereon. Allowed as last and chance. Bail application adjourned to 09.04.2026. For arguments on confirmation or otherwise. Applicants/accused present on interim pre-arrest bail they are directed to attend on next date of hearing. |
|
| 5 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 202/2026 | Malook & another VS The State | Shabir Hussain Umrani() | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-498 | 7/2026 Darya Khan Rind @ Maqsoodo Rind |
A.B.A called. Applicants/accused are present on ad-interim pre-arrest bail. Advocate for accused and ADPP for the state are present. Complainant and his counsel are also present. Compromise talks between the both parties. In the interest of larger justice. Bail application adjourned to 30.03.2026. For arguments on confirmation or otherwise. Applicants/accused are present on interim pre-arrest bail they are directed to attend on next date of hearing. |
| 6 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 208/2026 | Ghulam Shabir & Others VS The State | Shabir Hussain Umrani() | Cr.PC-498 | 7/2026 Darya Khan Rind @ Maqsoodo Rind |
A.B.A called. Applicants/accused are present on ad-interim pre-arrest bail. Advocate for accused and ADPP for the state are present. Complainant and his counsel are also present. Compromise talks between the both parties. In the interest of larger justice. Bail application adjourned to 30.03.2026. For arguments on confirmation or otherwise. Applicants/accused are present on interim pre-arrest bail they are directed to attend on next date of hearing. |
|
| 7 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 225/2026 | Ali Muhammad & Others VS The State | Shabir Hussain Umrani() | Cr.PC-498 | 11/2026 Sarhari |
Bail application U/S 498 CR.P.C called. Applicants/accused are present on interim pre-arrest bail. ADPP for the state and advocate for accused are present. Complainant and his counsel are present. Arguments heard for both sides. Order passed and announced in open court. The interim pre-arrest bail of applicants/accused is hereby confirmed on same terms and conditions. |
|
| 8 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 220/2026 | Chanear @ Chano VS The State | Shabir Hussain Umrani() | Cr.PC-498 | 62/2026 Shahdadpur |
Bail application U/S 498 CR.P.C called. Applicant/accused Chanesar @ Chano is present on interim pre-arrest bail. ADPP for the state and Advocate for accused are present. Arguments heard for both sides. Order passed and announced in open court. The interim pre-arrest bail of applicant/accused is hereby confirmed on same terms and conditions. |
|
| 9 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 229/2026 | Zia-Ul-Haq Khan VS The State | Asif Ali(ADVO-4895-SBC-HYD) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-498 | 65/2026 Shahdadpur |
Bail application U/S 498 CR.P.C called. Applicant/accused present on ad-interim pre-arrest bail. ADPP for the state and advocate for accused are present. Arguments heard for both sides. Order passed and announced in open court. Accordingly, his bail plea merits no consideration and the same stands rejected. Resultantly, earlier ad-interim bail order dated 03-03-2026 is hereby recalled. His bail bond stands cancelled and his surety is discharged. Needless to mention here that whatever the observations noted hereinabove being tentative in nature would not affect the merits of the case. |
| 10 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 254/2026 | Muhammad Yaseen & Others VS The State | Mahboob Ali(ADVO-6523-SBC-HYD) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-498 | 41/2026 Shahdadpur |
Bail application U/S 498 CR.P.C called. Applicants/accused are present on interim pre-arrest bail. ADPP for the state and advocate for accused are present. Complainant and his counsel are present. Both parties filed jointly statement. Order on it. File. Thereafter, Complainant given no objection. Arguments heard for both sides. Order passed and announced in open court. The interim pre-arrest bail of applicants/accused is hereby confirmed on same terms and conditions. |
| 11 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 301/2026 | Ahmed & Others VS The State | Arsalan Hussain Sayyed(ADVO-4517-SBC-HYD) | Cr.PC-498 | 56/2026 Shahdadpur |
Bail application U/S 498 CR.P.C called. Applicants/accused are present on interim pre-arrest bail. ADPP for the state is present. Mr. Mehboob Ali Bhanbhro advocate filed Vakalatnama on behalf of accused. Order on it. File. Complainant and his counsel are present. Thereafter, Complainant filed his no objection affidavit as well as given no objection. Arguments heard for both sides. Order passed and announced in open court. The interim pre-arrest bail of applicants/accused is hereby confirmed on same terms and conditions. |
|
| 12 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 312/2026 | Ali Amir VS The State | Nadeem Ahmed(ADVO-427-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-498 | 77/2026 Shahdadpur |
Bail application U/S 498 CR.P.C called. Applicant/accused Ali Amir is present on interim pre-arrest bail. ADPP for the state is present. Mr. Amjad Ali Keerio advocate filed Vakalatnama on behalf of accused. Order on it. File. Complainant Ghulam Dastgir is present. Mr. Shahzad Iqbal Gujar advocate filed Vakalatnama on behalf of complainant. Order on it. Thereafter, Advocate for complainant given no objection. Arguments heard for both sides. Order passed and announced in open court. The interim pre-arrest bail of applicant/accused is hereby confirmed on same terms and conditions. |
|
| 13 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 313/2026 | Fareed Khan VS The State | Mahboob Ali(ADVO-6523-SBC-HYD) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-498 | 62/2026 Shahdadpur |
Bail application U/S 498 CR.P.C called. Applicant/accused Fareed Khan is present on interim pre-arrest bail. ADPP for the state and Advocate for accused are present. Arguments heard for both sides. Order passed and announced in open court. The interim pre-arrest bail of applicant/accused is hereby confirmed on same terms and conditions. |
| 14 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 322/2026 | Sajjad Ali VS The State | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-498 | 62/2026 Shahdadpur |
Bail application U/S 498 CR.P.C called. Applicant/accused Sajjad Ali is present on interim pre-arrest bail. ADPP for the state and Advocate for accused are present. One Naveed Ali Son of Gahi Khan is present and stood surety for accused Sajjad and he has produce special saving certificate. Order passed thereon. Provisionally surety is accepted subject to verification. Thereafter, Arguments heard for both sides. Order passed and announced in open court. The interim pre-arrest bail of applicant/accused is hereby confirmed on same terms and conditions. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Hearing | |||||||
| 15 | Illegal Dispos. Act (Illegal Dispossesion Act) 29/2025 | Mir Muhammad VS Ahsan & Others | Shabir Hussain Umrani() | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3 | / |
Illegal Dispossessions complaint U/S 3,4 of illegal Dispossession Act,2005 called. Complainant Mir Muhammad is present. Advocate for complainant is present. Accused, Ahsan, Resham, Rehman Khan and Amanullah are also present. Mr. Abdul Majeed Hingoro advocate filed Vakalanama on behalf of accused. Order on it. File. Thereafter, arguments heard for both sides. Order passed and announced in open court. The occupation of the accused persons without lawful authority prima facie amounts to illegal occupation within the meaning of Section 3 of the Illegal Dispossession Act, 2005. At this stage, the complainant has successfully established sufficient grounds for taking cognizance of the offence. Accordingly, cognizance is hereby taken against the accused persons for an offence punishable under Section 3 of the Illegal Dispossession Act, 2005. Resultantly, the accused are hereby directed to furnish their sureties in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only) each and PR bonds in the like amount to the satisfaction of this Court. Since the accused Ahsan, Resham, Rehman Khan and Amanullah have entered their appearance through his advocate thus they are hereby directed to furnish their sureties till next date of hearing without fail while bailable warrant in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only) be issued against the accused Ali Nawaz to be executed by the SHO PS Sarhari. Put off 09.04.2026. For execution of B.Ws upon accused Ali Nawaz as well as for supply of copies and further proceedings. |
| 16 | Illegal Dispos. Act (Illegal Dispossesion Act) 3/2026 | Nafees-Ur-Rehman VS SHO PS Shahdadpur & Others | Mahboob Ali(ADVO-6523-SBC-HYD) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3 | / |
Criminal compliant/illegal dispossession U/S 3 & 4 of illegal dispossession act 2005, called. Complainant is present. Advocate for complainant is present. Proposed accused Anees-ur-Rehman called absent. Mr. Zain-ul-abdin advocate for Proposed accused Anees-ur-Rehman is present. Thereafter, advocate for complainant not pressed this subject complaint. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open court. The instant Criminal compliant/illegal dispossession U/S 3 & 4 of illegal dispossession act 2005, stand dismissed as not pressed. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 17 | SC (Murder Trial) 365/2019 | The State VS Muhammad Usman and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR),Muhammad Ali Shaikh(ADVO-158-SBC-SGR) | Anwar Hussain(ADVO-3478-SBC-KHS),Ayaz Khaskheli(ADVO-4558-SBC-HYD) | PPC-114,PPC-302 | 280/2019 Shahdadpur |
Sessions case called. Accused Muhammad Saleem, Waseem @ Suhno and Dildar are present on bail. While remaining co-accused Muhammad Usman has been died and proceeding against him already abated. ADPP for the state is present. Advocate for accused called absent. Advocate for complainant also called absent. No P.W is present. Issue fresh summon upon complainant and all required P.Ws. Call for case property. In the interest of larger justice. Case is adjourned to 15.04.2026 for evidence. Present accused are directed to attend on next date of hearing . |
| 18 | SC (Murder Trial) 15/2026 | The State VS Inayatullah and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | PPC-302 | 189/2025 Shahdadpur |
Sessions case called. Accused Inayatullah is present on bail. Co-accused Muhammad Bux and Afzal are also present on ad-interim pre-arrest bail. Remaining co-accused Kamran had already been declared as P.O. ADPP for the state and advocate for accused are present. Advocate for complainant is present and filed application for adjournment. Order passed thereon. Allowed as last chance. No P.W is present. Issue fresh summon upon all required P.Ws. Call case property. In the interest of larger justice. Case adjourned to 09.04.2026. For evidence. Accused present on bail they are directed to attend on next date of hearing. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 19 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 379/2026 | Mst. Abida VS SSP Sanghar & Others | Ehsan Ahmed(ADVO-50527-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I),Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Criminal. Misc. Application U/S 22/A CR.P.C called. Applicant and her counsel are present. Proposed accused are called absent. Thereafter, advocate her applicant not pressed this subject application. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open court. The instant Criminal. Misc. Application U/S 22/A CR.P.C stand dismissed as not pressed. |
|
| 20 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 440/2026 | Abdullah VS SSP Sanghar & Others | Mehnaz (ADVO-604-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Criminal. Misc. Application U/S 22/A CR.P.C called. Applicant and his counsel are present. Proposed accused are present. Compromise talks between the both parties. In the interest of larger justice. The instant Criminal. Misc. Application U/S 22/A CR.P.C adjourned to 30.03.2026. For arguments. |
|
| 21 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 446/2026 | Ghulam Mohi-U-Din VS SSP Sanghar & Others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I),Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Criminal. Misc. Application U/S 22/A CR.P.C called. Applicant is present. Mr. Nadeem Ahmed Pathan advocate filed Vakalatnama on behalf of applicant. Order on it. File. Proposed accused is present. Mr. Naseer Ahmed Rajput also filed Vakalatnama on behalf of proposed accused. Reports are received from Incharge S.P complaint Cell Sanghar and S.H.O of P.S Shahdadpur. Order on it. File. Thereafter, Arguments heard for both sides. Order passed and announced in open court. The instant Criminal. Misc. Application U/S 22/A CR.P.C is hereby dismissed. |
|
| 22 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 476/2026 | Mst. Laila VS SSP Sanghar & Others | Amjad Ali (ADVO-51194-SBC-HYD) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Criminal. Misc. Application U/S 22/A CR.P.C called. Applicant called absent. Advocate her applicant is present. Proposed accused are absent. Thereafter, advocate her applicant not pressed this subject application. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open court. The instant Criminal. Misc. Application U/S 22/A CR.P.C stand dismissed as not pressed. |
| 23 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 528/2026 | Aziz Khan VS SSP Sanghar & Others | Waheed Ali(ADVO-50964-SBC-KHC) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Criminal. Misc. Application U/S 22/A CR.P.C called. Applicant and his counsel are present. Proposed accused No. 02 is present. Mr. Nadeem Ahmed Pathan Advocate filed Vakalatnama on behalf of proposed accused. Order on it. File. Reports are received from Incharge S.P Complaint cell Sanghar and S.H.O P.S Shahdadpur. Order on it. File. Heard. Enquiry of subject matter handed over to Mukhtiarkar Revenue Taluka Shahdadpur. Issue letter to Mukhtiarkar Revenue Taluka Shahdadpur with direction to conduct fair enquiry of subject matter and submit report on next date of hearing. The instant Criminal. Misc. Application U/S 22/A CR.P.C adjourned to 31.03.2026. For want of enquiry report as well as for arguments. |
| 24 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 527/2026 | Muhammad Anwar & another VS SSP Sanghar & Others | Asif Yaqoob (ADVO-22701-SBC-KHE) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Criminal. Misc. Application U/S 22/A CR.P.C called. Applicants are called absent. Advocate for applicants also called absent. Proposed accused is absent. Reports are received from Incharge S.P complaint Cell Sanghar and S.H.O of P.S Shahdadpur. Order on it. File. Thereafter, Order passed and announced in open court. The instant Criminal. Misc. Application U/S 22/A CR.P.C stand dismissed in non prosecution. |
| 25 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 522/2026 | Dilshan VS SSP Sanghar & Others | Waheed Ali(ADVO-50964-SBC-KHC) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Criminal. Misc. Application U/S 22/A CR.P.C called. Applicant and his counsel are present. Proposed accused is present. Mr. Sanjay Kumar advocate filed Vakalatnama on behalf of proposed accused. Order on it. File. Reports are received from Incharge S.P complaint Cell Sanghar and S.H.O of P.S Shahdadpur. Order on it. File. In the interest of larger justice. The instant Criminal. Misc. Application U/S 22/A CR.P.C adjourned to 31.03.2026 for arguments. |
| 26 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 537/2026 | Saqib Hussain VS SSP Sanghar & Others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I),Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Criminal. Misc. Application U/S 22/A CR.P.C called. Applicant and his counsel are present. Proposed accused are present. Mr. Nadeem Ahmed Khan Pathan advocate filed Vakalatnama on behalf of proposed accused. Order passed on it. File. Reports are received from Incharge S.P complaint Cell Sanghar and S.H.O of P.S Shahdadpur. Order on it. File. Heard. Thereafter, order passed on separate sheet. Let the copies of entire case be sent to Deputy Director FIA Shaheed Benzirabad for conducting proper enquiry and after completion of the same, he shall have to submit the report before this court. The instant Criminal. Misc. Application U/S 22/A CR.P.C adjourned to 10.04.2026. For report of FIA as well as for arguments. |
|
| 27 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 534/2026 | Sohail Ahmed VS SSP Sanghar & Others | Rizwan Ahmed(ADVO-753-SBC-SGR) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Criminal. Misc. Application U/S 22/A CR.P.C called. Applicant is present. Mr. Nadeem Ahmed Pathan advocate filed Vakalatnama on behalf of applicant. Order on it. File. Proposed accused called absent. Reports are received from Incharge S.P complaint Cell Sanghar and S.H.O of P.S Shahdadpur. Order on it. File. Thereafter, Arguments heard . Order passed and announced in open court. The instant Criminal. Misc. Application U/S 22/A CR.P.C stand disposed off accordingly. |
| 28 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 538/2026 | Shabbir Ahmed VS SSP Sanghar & Others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Criminal. Misc. Application U/S 22/A CR.P.C called. Applicant and his counsel are present. Respondents No. 02 & 03 are present. Reports are received from Incharge S.P complaint Cell Sanghar and S.H.O of P.S Sarhari. Order on it. File. Thereafter, advocate for applicant not pressed this subject application. Arguments heard . Order passed and announced in open court. The instant Criminal. Misc. Application U/S 22/A CR.P.C stand dismissed as not pressed. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 29 | SC (Murder Trial) 167/2019 | The State VS Bashir Ahmed and others | Abdul Hafeez Khoso (ADVO-1015-SBC-NWB) | Abdul Hafeez Khoso (ADVO-1015-SBC-NWB),Ahmed Ali(ADVO-278-SBC-SGR) | PPC-201.,PPC-302,PPC-311 | 79/2018 Shahpur Chakar |
Sessions case and application U/S 497(5) CR.P.C and application U/S 227 CR.P.C called. Accused Ashique and Akbar are present on bail. While co-accused Bashir Ahmed and Mukhtiar are also present on ad-interim pre-arrest bail. ADPP for the state and advocate for accused are present. Advocate for complainant is present. Today amended charge framed upon accused Bashir Ahmed, Mukhtiar, Ashique and Akbar at Ex. 14. Pleas of accused Bashir Ahmed, Mukhtiar, Ashique and Akbar are recorded at Ex. 15 to Ex. 18. Accused pleaded not guilty and claimed to be trial. Issue summon upon complainant and all required P.Ws. Call case property. Thereafter, advocate for complainant not pressed this subject application U/S 227 CR.P.C. Order passed thereon. Application U/S 227 CR.P.C stand dismissed as not pressed. Complainant Mst: Waddan and P.W Abdul Ghafoor are present and bound down. In the interest of larger justice. Case adjourned to 07.04.2026 for order on application U/S 497(5) CR.P.C as well as for evidence. Accused present on bail they are directed to attend on next date of hearing. |
| 30 | PPC 90/2026 | The State VS Ramesh & Another | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Shahid Khan(ADVO-343-SBC-SGR) | Prohibition (Enforcement Of Hadd) Order, 1979-3,Prohibition (Enforcement Of Hadd) Order, 1979-4 | 419/2025 Shahdadpur |
Sessions case called. Accused Ramesh and Sarwan are present on bail. ADPP for the state is present. Advocate for accused called absent. In the interest of larger justice. Case adjourned to 15.04.2026 for framing of charge. Accused present on bail they are directed to attend on next date of hearing. |
| 31 | PPC 89/2026 | The State VS Mir Murtaza and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | PPC-324 | 12/2026 Shahpur Chakar |
Sessions case called. Accused Mir Murtaza, Ayaz Ali and Niaz Hussain are present on bail. ADPP for the state is present. Advocate for accused called absent. In the interest of larger justice. Case adjourned to 16.04.2026 for framing of charge. Accused present on bail they are directed to attend on next date of hearing. |
|
| 32 | SC (Murder Trial) 91/2026 | The State VS Ali Akber | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | PPC-302 | 428/2025 Shahdadpur |
Sessions case called. Accused Ali Akbar is produced in custody from Superintendent District Prison & Correctional Facility Sanghar . ADPP for the state is present. Being a capital punishment case could not proceed in absence of defense counsel. Accused is directed to engage any advocate. In the interest of larger justice. Case adjourned to 09.04.2026 for framing of charge. Accused produced in custody and remanded back to jail with direction to produce on next date of hearing. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION Advocate to be Heard | |||||||
| 1 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 17/2026 |
Shahmeer Khan VS Ahmed Khan & Others | Sajjad Ali (ADVO-5426-SBC-HYD) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Civil Appeal U/S 96 C.P.C called. Appellant and his counsel are called absent. In the interest of larger justice. Civil Appeal adjourned to 06.04.2026 for hearing. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 2 | C.Rev. (Civil Revisions) 4/2026 |
Ghulam Ali VS P.O Sindh & Others | Amjad Ali (ADVO-51194-SBC-HYD) | Iftikhar Hussain Tareen(ADVO-659-SBC-SGR) | Civil Revision Application U/S 115 CPC and application U/S 151 CPC called. Attorney of applicant called absent. Advocate for applicant is present. Respondent No.03 Muhammad Ali is present. Advocate for respondent is present. Mr. Bashir Ahmed Siyal Incharge of District Attorney Sanghar also present on behalf of the Government official respondents. Advocate for respondent filed objection on application U/S 151 CPC. Order on it. Copy to other side. Notice not issued. Today order passed on order sheet. Repeat notice upon remaining respondent No 02 through pasting as well as publication, matter be published in daily News paper Sindhi Puhanji Akhbar on costs. In the interest of larger justice. Civil Revision Application adjourned to 30.03.2026. For hearing on application U/S 151 CPC as well as for service upon respondent No.02 through pasting as well as publication. |
||
| 3 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 23/2026 |
Muhammad Moosa VS Province of Sindh & Others | Asif Ali(ADVO-4895-SBC-HYD) | DDA(DDA-0001-GOV-SGR) | Civil Appeal U/S 96 CPC called. Appellant and his counsel are present. Respondent Nos. 04,05 & 08 are present. Mr. Basheer Ahmed Siyal incharge of District Attorney Sanghar also present on behalf of official government respondents Nos. 01 to 09. Not not issued. Repeat notice upon respondent No. 10 through bailiff of this court. In the interest of larger justice. Civil Appeal adjourned to 14.04.2026. For service upon respondent No. 10. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION Advocate to be Heard | |||||||
| 4 | C.Rev. (Civil Revisions) 5/2026 |
Hazi Hamzo Since dead through his LRs VS Mst. Naimat & Others | Ahmed Ali(ADVO-278-SBC-SGR) | DDA(DDA-0001-GOV-SGR) | Civil Revision Application U/S 115 CPC called. Attorney of applicants is absent. Advocate for applicants is present . Heard. Order passed and announced in open Court. Civil Revision admit register . Subject to all legal objections if any. Issue summons/Notice upon respondent through court bailiff and registered post AD/- on Cost. Put off 08.04.2025. For service. |
||
| 5 | C.Rev. (Civil Revisions) 6/2026 |
Shameer Khan VS Ahmed Khan & Others | DDA(DDA-0001-GOV-SGR) | Civil Revision application U/S 115 CPC called. Appellant called absent. Advocate for appellant also called absent. In the interest of large justice. Civil Revision application adjourned to 06.04.2026. For advocate to be heard. |
|||
| 6 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 32/2026 |
Barkat Ali VS Abdul Rehman & Others | Ahmed Ali(ADVO-278-SBC-SGR) | DDA(DDA-0001-GOV-SGR) | Civil Appeal U/S 96 CPC called. Appellant is absent. Advocate for Appellant is present. In the interest of larger justice. Civil Appeal adjourned to 09.04.2026. For Advocate to be heard. |
||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Succession Miscellaneous Applications | |||||||
| 1 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 6/2026 | Sht. Maya VS Devananad & Others | Nadeem Ahmed(ADVO-427-SBC-SGR) | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-372 | Succession application U/S 372 of Succession Act,1925 called. Applicant called absent. Advocate her applicant is present. Opponents are called absent. In the interest of larger justice. Succession application adjourned to 30.03.2026. For objections as well as for arguments. |
||
| 2 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 19/2026 | Muhammad Umair VS Mst. Naseem & Others | Jameel Ahmed(ADVO-728-SBC-SGR) | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-278,SUCCESSION ACT 1925-372 | Succession application U/S 372 of Succession Act,1925 called. Applicant called absent. Advocate for applicant is present. Opponents are absent. Today the matter is fixed for objections/hearing but learned counsel for the applicant filed statement for withdrawal the matter with permission to file afresh on the ground that one minor namely baby Faria is not mentioned due to bonafide mistake. Such statement is taken on record and thereby instant succession application stands dismissed as not pressed/withdrawn and permission is accorded to applicant to file afresh. There is no order as to costs. |
||