| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.M.A. (Criminal Misc. Applications) 11/2025 | Roshan Ali Palli VS SHO PS Boder Farm & Others | Shareef() | Saddam Hussain (ADVO-1240-SBC-MKS) | Cr.PC-Section 133 of CrPc | / |
Crl.Misc. Application is called. Applicant and his learned Counsel are present. Respondent No.6 and his Counsel are present. Cross examination of applicant is recorded. At this stage the learned counsel for private respondent No. 4 to 9 filed adjournment application for reserving the further cross, which is allowed. Matter is adjourned and put off to 16.11.2026 for evidence/ cross examination of applicant. |
| 2 | PPC 3/2026 | The State VS Jaipal Singh | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-UK) | Shareef() | PPC-489-F | 116/2025 Umerkot City |
Case called. Accused is absent. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Advocate for accused and counsel for complainant are absent. Complainant is present.Advocate for accused filed application for excuse absence of accused. Order on it. Excused. Case put off to 07-11-2026 for evidence and arguments on application U/S: 249-A Cr.P.C. Complainant is directed to attend and bring his witnesses. |
| 3 | Hd.T. (Hudood Trial) 128/2026 | The State VS Mukesh Oad and another | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-UK) | Hudood Ordinances-3/4 PEHO | 114/2026 Umerkot City |
Case called. Both accused are present on bail. Learned ADPP for the state and defence counsel are present.Process returned un-served.No P.W is present. Case put off to 10-11-2026 for Evidence. Repeat summons to P.Ws. Both accused are directed to attend. |
|
| 4 | PPC 156/2026 | The State VS Kelash Lohano | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-UK) | Aijaz Ali (ADVO-84-SBC-UMR) | PPC-489-F | 57/2026 Umerkot City |
Case called. Accused is absent. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Junior defence Counsel is present. Complainant is present. Complainant and his P.W Gopal are present. Advocate for accused filed application for excuse absence of accused. Order on it. Excused. Case put off to 07-11-2026 for evidence. Complainant and present P.W are directed to attend. |
| 5 | PPC 165/2026 | The State VS Kailash & another | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-UK) | IN PERSON (SELF)(ADVO-001-SBC-MKS) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 5,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8 | 176/2026 Umerkot City |
Case called. Both accused are present on bail. ADPP for the state and junior defence Counsel are present. PW/PC Abbas Ali is examined at Exh.06. Learned ADPP for the state close the site of prosecution evidence by filling his statement at Exh.7. Order on it. Statements of both accused persons as required U/S: 342 Cr.P.C have been recorded at Exh.8 and 9. Arguments heard from both the sides. Judgement passed at Exh.10 and announced in open court. Both accused are acquitted U/S: 245 (i) Cr.P.C. They are present on bail, their bail bonds stand cancelled and sureties discharged. |
| 6 | PPC 182/2026 | The State VS Raja Naseeb ul Rehman & another | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-UK) | IN PERSON (SELF)(ADVO-001-SBC-MKS) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 5,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8 | 201/2026 Umerkot City |
Case called.Both accused persons are present on bail. ADPP for the state and defence Counsel for accused Raja Naseebullah are present. No P.W is present. Case put off to 09-11-2026 for evidence. Both accused are directed to attend.Repeat summons to P.Ws. |
| 7 | PPC 197/2026 | The State VS Muhammad Soomar Khaskheli | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-UK) | Ameer Ali(ADVO-50348-SBC-UMR) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 5,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8 | 12/2026 Soofi Fakir |
Case called. Accused is present on bail. ADPP for the state and defence Counsel are present. Complainant ASI Dawood Ali Lanjo is present and examined at Exh.3. He produced entry No.12, memo of recovery and FIR at Exh.3/A to 3/C. PW/PC Abdul Wahid is examined at Exh.4. He produced memo of site inspection at Exh. 4/A. Learned and defence counsel filed application U/S: 249-A Cr.P.C on behalf of accused. Order on it. Notice to ADPP. Heard arguments. Order passed and announced in the open court. Accused is hereby acquitted U/S: 249-A Cr.P.C. He is present on bail, his bail bond stands cancelled and surety discharged. |
| 8 | PPC 199/2026 | The State VS Barkat Ali Khaskheli | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-UK) | Imtiaz Ali Samoon(ADVO-56-SBC-UMR) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 5,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8 | 105/2026 Umerkot City |
Case called.Accused Barkat Ali present on bail. ADPP for the state and defence Counsel are present. Process returned unserved. No P.W is present. Case put off to 09.11.2026 for evidence. Accused is directed to attend. Issue summons to P.Ws. |
| 9 | PPC 208/2026 | The State VS Ramesh Menghwar | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-UK) | Gulab (ADVO-91-SBC-UMR) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 5,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8 | 97/2026 Umerkot City |
Case called. Accused is present on bail. ADPP for the state and defence counsel are present. BW issued against complainant ASI Arshad Ali returned as un executed, while process returned un-served. No P.W is present. Case put of to 12.11.2026 for evidence. Accused is directed to attend. Repeat summons BWs against complainant and summons to PWs. |
| 10 | Hd.T. (Hudood Trial) 201/2026 | The State VS Jamal Khaskheli & another | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-UK) | Heera Lal(),Phool Vanti(ADVO-11682-SBC-KHS) | Hudood Ordinances-3/4 PEHO | 39/2026 Soofi Fakir |
Case called.Accused Jamal Khaskheli is confined in Central Prison Mirpurkhas, has not been produced in custody from J/A Mirpurkhas. Accused Arbab is present on bail. ADPP for the state is present, while defence Counsel for accused Jamal is present. Mr. Heeralal Oad filed power on behalf of accused Arbab. Order on it. Case put of to 03-11-2026 for evidence. Accused Arbab is directed to attend. Issue P.O for accused Jamal. Repeat summons to P.Ws and call case property. |
| 11 | PPC 213/2026 | The State VS GhanSham | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-UK) | Sobdar Khan Khoso() | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 5,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8 | 189/2026 Umerkot City |
Case called. Accused is present on bail. ADPP for the state and defence Counsel are present. Process returned un-served. No P.W is present. Case put off to 03.11.2026 for evidence. Repeat summons to P.Ws and call case property |
| 12 | Hd.T. (Hudood Trial) 217/2026 | The State VS Lalchand Kolhi & another | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-UK) | Phool Vanti(ADVO-11682-SBC-KHS) | Hudood Ordinances-3/4 PEHO | 25/2025 Soofi Fakir |
Case called. Accused is present on bail. ADPP for the state and defence counsel are present. No PW is present. Case put off to 04.11.2026 for evidence.Accused is directed to attend. Issue letter to SSP Umerkot for evidence of complainant and other PWs. Accused is directed to attend. |
| 13 | PPC 219/2026 | The State VS Ali Raza Lashari & antoher | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-UK) | Ashfaque Ali Halepoto(ADVO-51148-SBC-UMR),Bilal (ADVO-94-SBC-UMR) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 5,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8 | 218/2026 Umerkot City |
Case called.Accused Ali Raza is present on bail, while accused Manzoor is called absent. ADPP for the state and advocates for both accused are present. I.O SIP Allaudin Khoso is present and examined at Exh.07. He produced memo of site inspection, entries No. 13 and 19, Letter to chemical examiner, entries No. 25 and 20, receipt, chemical report and CRO of accused at Exh. 7/A to 7/G. Learned ADPP close the side of prosecution evidence vide his statements which is kept on record at Exh. 8. Case put off to 30-10-2026 for statement of accused. Present accused is directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 14 | PPC 183/2022 | The State VS Ghulam Mustafa & Another | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-UK),Muhammad Raheem(ADVO-54-SBC-UMR) | PPC-34,PPC-406,PPC-420,The Telegraph Act, 1885 -25-D | 92/2022 Kunri |
Case called. Accused Ghulam Mustafa is called absent. Learned ADPP for the state and defence Counsel are present. Complainant is absent. Defence counsel filed application for excuse absence of accused. Order on it.Issue B.Ws against accused and notice to his surety. Case put off to 16-11-2026 for Charge. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Misc. Applications | |||||||
| 15 | Application u/s 516-A CrPc 38/2026 | Abdul Rehman Samejo VS The State | Mian Bux Khoso() | Cr.PC-516-A | 252/2026 Umerkot City |
Crl:Misc: application called. ADPP for the state is present. Applicant and his counsel are present. Reports already received from SHO PS Umerkot city and excise department. Arguments heard. Order passed announced in open court. Application is hereby allowed subject to furnish the surety in the sum of Rs. 5,00,000/- with PR bond in like amount. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Orders | |||||||
| 16 | Cr.M.A. (Criminal Misc. Applications) 37/2026 | Muhammad Hassan VS Mukhtiarkar Revenue Umerkot & Others | Bashir Ahmed(ADVO-22901-SBC-KHS) | Cr.PC-133 | / |
Crl Misc application is called. Applicant is absent. His counsel is present. None is present from respondent side. Applicant's counsel filed statement and withdrawn the instant application. Order passed on it. The instant application is dismissed as withdrawn. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Judgment | |||||||
| 17 | PPC 86/2026 | The State VS Shahoo Bheel and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-UK) | PPC-380,PPC-457 | 176/2025 Umerkot City |
Case called. All accused persons namely Sahoo, Teerath and Mist: Aisha are present on bail, while accused Jetho Bheel already declared as proclaimed offender, vide order dated 08-04-2026. Judgement passed at Exh.17 and announced in open court. All present accused are acquitted U/S: 245 (i) Cr.P.C. They are present on bail, their bail bonds stand cancelled and sureties discharged. Whereas the case of proclaimed offender accused namely Jetho son of Tejo bheel is on same footing to the cased of present accused. Therefore he is also acquitted U/S: 245 (i) Cr.P.C in his absentia. Let the copy Judgement the sent to concerned SHO for information and compliance. |
|