| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | PPC 92/2025 | THE STATE. VS MUHAMMAD USMAN MEHAR & OTHERS. | ADPP(ADPP-0003-GOV-MPK),Aiman(ADVO-1277-SBC-MKS) | Araz Muhammad(ADVO-1009-SBC-MKS) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-337-H,PPC-342,PPC-382,PPC-506 | 16/2025  Mirpur Old  | 	
	  CASE NO: 92 / 2025 THE STATE.V/S.MUHAMMAD USMAN MEHAR & OTHERS. Case called. Accused persons namely 01. Muhammad Usman Mehar 02. Muhammad Younis Mehar 03. Muhammad Rajab Mehar 04. Muhammd Iqbal. 05. Muhammad Majid. 06. Muhammad Majid. 07. Pir Bux Mehar 08. Arbab. 09. Arshad. 10. Abrar. 11. Raja @ Waseem Mehar. 12. Ramesh Meghwar 14. Misir Mehar 15. Allahi Dino Mehar and 16. Waheed Mehar are present on bail while accused namely Leemon is called absent but he is on bail and accused Saleem Mehar and accused Mohib Mehar ( both names are shown in calum-2 in challan sheet.) are called absent they are already declared as proclaimed offenders. Mr. Arz Muhammad Unnar advocate for all accused persons is present. Mr. Aimon Ali Memon learned counsel for complainant is called absent. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Learned counsel for accused filed application for excuse of absence accused Leemon. Order on it. Condoned. Today case is fixed for evidence. Process / summon returned un-served against P.Ws. P.Ws are called absent except complainant namely Shiva Ram is present. Case put off to.....19-11-2025 for evidence. Office is directed to issue summon against complainant and all witnesses and call case property. 15 present accused persons are direct to attend to this court on the next date of hearing without fail.  | 
  
| 2 | PPC 127/2025 | THE STATE. VS JAI RAM DAS MALHI. | ADPP(ADPP-0003-GOV-MPK) | Girdhari Lal(ADVO-1227-SBC-MKS) | PPC-420,PPC-422,PPC-489-F,PPC-506 | 79/2025  Satellite Town  | 	
	  CASE NO: 127 / 2025 THE STATE.V/S.JAI RAM DAS MALHI. Case called. Accused Jai Ram Das Malhi is present on bail. Mr. Gildari Lal learned counsel for accused is present. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Today case is fixed for evidence. Process / B.Ws issued against complainant and witnesses same is returned un-executed against complainant and P.Ws are called absent. Case adjourned. Put off to......21-11-2025 for evidence. Office is directed to repeat B.Ws against complainant and all witnesses and call case property. Present accused is direct to attend to this court on the next date of hearing without fail.  | 
  
| 3 | PPC 169/2025 | THE STATE. VS AMJAD ALI JATT. | ADPP(ADPP-0003-GOV-MPK) | Ittehad Hussain(ADVO-427-SBC-MKS),Rashid Ali() | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 10 ,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8 | 88/2025  Satellite Town  | 	
	  CASE NO: 169 / 2025 THE STATE.V/S.AMJAD ALI JATT. Case called. Accused Amjad Ali Jatt is present on bail. Learned counsel for accused Mr. Itehad Hussain Khaskheli is present. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Today case is fixed for evidence. Process / summon issued against complainant and witnesses and same process is returned un-served. P.Ws are called absent. Case put off to........20-11-2025 for evidence. Office is directed to issue B.Ws against complainant and all witnesses and call case property. Present accused is direct to attend to this court on the next date of hearing without fail.  | 
  
| 4 | PPC 199/2025 | THE STATE. VS SOHAIL MEO RAJPUT. | ADPP(ADPP-0003-GOV-MPK) | Muhammad Sultan(ADVO-1192-SBC-MKS) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8 | 112/2025  Satellite Town  | 	
	  CASE NO: 199 / 2025 THE STATE.V/S.SOHAIL MEO RAJPUT. Case called. Accused Sohail Meo Rajput is present on bail. Learned counsel for accused Mr. Muhammad Sultan Shoro is present. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Today case is fixed for evidence. Process / summon issued against complainant and witnesses same process is returned un-served as per endorsement of bailiff. P.Ws are called absent. Case put off to........20-11-2025 for evidence. Office is directed to issue B.Ws against complainant and all witnesses and call case property. Present accused is direct to attend to this court on the next date of hearing without fail.  | 
  
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Supply of Copies | |||||||
| 5 | PPC 210/2025 | THE STATE. VS MUMTAZ ALI PANHWAR. | ADPP(ADPP-0003-GOV-MPK) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8 | 62/2025  Mirpur Old  | 	
	  CASE NO: 210 / 2025 THE STATE.V/S.MUMTAZ ALI PANHWAR. Case called. Accused Mumtaz Ali Panhwar is produce in custody from central prison Mirpurkhas. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Today case is fixed for supply of copies. Today copy supplied to present accused at Ex: 01 as per receipt. Case put off to.........13-11-2025 for framing charge against accused. Accused Mumtaz Ali Panhwar is remained back to custody in central prison Mirpurkhas with direction to again produce in custody before this court on the next date of hearing without fail.  | 
  |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 6 | PPC 218/2025 | THE STATE. VS MUHAMMAD ASLAM MALIK & OTHERS. | ADPP(ADPP-0003-GOV-MPK) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8 | 68/2025  Mirpur Old  | 	
	  CASE NO: 218 / 2025 THE STATE.V/S. MUHAMMAD ASLAM MALIK & OTHERS. Case called. Accused is produced by jail authorities. His counsel and state counsel are also present. Charge framed against accused at Ex: 02, wherein he pleaded not guilty. His plea was obtained at Ex: 02 / A. Adjourned to 12-11-2025 for evidence. Accused is sent back to jail. Issue summons to P.Ws.  | 
  |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Formal Cases | |||||||
| 7 | PPC 166/2025 | THE STATE. VS MUHAMMAD ISLAM MEO RAJPUT. | ADPP(ADPP-0003-GOV-MPK) | Rana Rahil Mehmood(ADVO-457-SBC-MKS) | PPC-420,PPC-489-F | 90/2025  Satellite Town  | 	
	  CASE NO: 166 / 2025 THE STATE.V/S.MUHAMMAD ISLAM MEO RAJPUT. Case called. Accused Muhammad Islam called absent. Complainant and his learned counsel are called absent. Today case is fixed for formal proceedings 87 / 88 Cr.P.C, against absent accused. Today process server / SIP-Abdul Waheed is appeared and he recorded his statement at Ex: 02 he produce N.B.Ws un-executed at Ex: 02 / A and statement of two local persons at Ex: 02 / B to 02 / C and he produce his endorsement at Ex: 02 / D. Order passed on it. In view of report of process server / SIP-Abdul Waheed of P.S. Satellite Town, Mirpurkhas it reveals that accused namely ( i ) Muhammad Islam Son of Muhammad Yamin, has shifted to un-known place and his present where about is not known to any one so there are no likelihood for arrest of accused namely ( i ) Muhammad Islam Son of Muhammad Yamin. Issue proclamation notice U/s 87 & 88 Cr.P.C, against the above named accused person. Further process server / SIP-Abdul Waheed is recorded his statement at Ex: 03 and he produce copy of notice under section 87 Cr.P.C, at Ex: 03 / A and he produce public notice at Ex: 03 / B and statement of two witnesses of locality at Ex: 03 / C & 03 / D, and he produce his endorsement at Ex: 03 / E and he also produce report of Mukhtiarkar U/s 88 Cr.P.C at Ex: 03 / F. Order passed on it. Since the proceedings U/s 87 & 88 Cr.P.C, have bee duly executed against the above named absconder accused ( i ) Muhammad Islam Son of Muhammad Yamin, hence I hereby declared them proclaimed offender. Today order passed on separate sheet. Announced in open court. As per order the accused Muhammad Islam Son of Muhammad Yamin Meo Rajput is hereby already declared as a proclaimed offender. Consequently, the case is ordered to be placed on the dormant filed until the accused is arrested by the police or he voluntarily appears before this court. Intimation in this regard be sent to the concerned police station for compliance. Case put off to....04-02-2026 for submitting quarterly report against accused. Office is directed to issue life time warrant of arrest of accused Muhammad Islam Meo Rajput Son of Muhammad Yamin Meo Rajput.  | 
  
| 8 | PPC 216/2025 | THE STATE. VS MUHAMMAD MUREED UMRANI & OTHERS. | ADPP(ADPP-0003-GOV-MPK) | PPC-34,PPC-365 | 59/2025  Mirpur Old  | 	
	  CASE NO: 216 / 2025 THE STATE.V/S.MUHAMMAD MUREED UMRANI & OTHERS. Case called. Accused persons namely Muhammad Nawaz Umrani and accused Imtiaz Umrani are produce in custody from central prison Mirpurkhas while accused namely Muhammad Mureed Umrani is called absent he is absconder shown in final challan sheet. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Today process / notice issued against complainant and same process / notice is returned un-served as per endorsement of concerned police station but complainant is called absent. Today Mr. Aziz Ahmed Laghari is appeared and he filed his vakalatnama on behalf of both accused persons. Order on it. File. Case put off to...11-11-2025 for formal proceeding against absconder accused and supply of copies. Office is directed to issue N.B.Ws and 87 / 88 Cr.P.C. proceeding against absconder accused namely Muhammad Nawaz Umrani. Both accused are remained back to custody in central prison Mirpurkhas with direction to again produce in custody before this court on the next date of hearing without fail, alongwith proper security.  | 
  |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | IIIrd Class Civil Suits 7/2025  | 
    EIDOO MARI. VS JASOO MAL. | Nizamuddin Pirzada(ADVO-96-SBC-MKS) |    T.C. SUIT NO: 07 / 2025 EIDOO MARI.V/S.JASOO MAL. T.C. Suit called. Plaintiff Eidoo Mari is present while Mr. Nizamuddin. H. Pirzada learned counsel for plaintiff is called absent his junior counsel is present. Today matter is fixed for service. Process not issued against defendant due to non submitted fresh address by learned counsel for plaintiff. Today learned counsel for plaintiff filed fresh address of defendant at Ex: 06. Order on it. Let the process be issued through post as well as through bailiff of this court and concerned court Khipro. Matter put off to..........20-11-2025 for service. Office is directed to issue process against defendant through bailiff of this court and concerned court learned Civil Judge & Judicial Magistrate Khipro, as well as register post on cost of plaintiff.( See Ex: 06 )  | 
  |||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Compliance | |||||||
| 1 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 32/2021 | Muhammad Bilal VS Mst Nadia | Imran Ashraf() | Asif(ADVO-470-SBC-MKS) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 (For Custody) |   GUARDIANSHIP APPLICATION NO: 32 / 2021 MUHAMMAD BILAL.V/S.MST: NADIA. Misc: Application U/s 100 Cr.P.C, in G. Application called. Applicant is called absent while her learned counsel Mr. Imran Ashraf Panhwar is present. Today matter is fixed for compliance and service against opponent. Process issued against opponent through court bailiff same process is returned un-served as per endorsement of bailiff. Matter put off to........14-11-2025 for compliance / service. Office is directed to issue process against opponent through court bailiff as well as register post, TCS including publication on cost of applicant.  | 
  |
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 2 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 26/2025 | TAJ MUHAMMAD VS MUHAMMAD RIZWAN & OTHERS | Shahzad Ali(ADVO-600-SBC-MKS) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 10,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 29 Guardian and wards Act 1890 for permission of sale,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 7 |   GUARDIANSHIP APPLICATION NO: 26 / 2025 TAJ MUHAMMAD.V/S.MUHAMMAD RIZWAN & OTHERS. Guardianship Application called. Applicant and his learned counsel Mr. Choudhry Shahzad Ali are present. Today matter is fixed for service against opponents. Process issued against opponents through court bailiff and same is returned un-served as per endorsement of bailiff. Opponents are called absent. Matter put off to.......25-11-2025 for service opponents. Office is directed to issue process against opponents through court bailiff as well as register post, TCS including publication on cost of applicant and office is further directed to call spot inquiry regarding L.Rs of deceased and so also call list of share of minors and current value of property from concerned Mukhtiarkar Taluka Mirpurkhas and issue letter to NADRA authority for calling FRC.  | 
  ||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 3 | F.S. (Family Suits) 100/2025 | MST: NOUSHEEN ABBASI. VS MUHAMMAD SHAHID ABBASI. | Bilal Ahmed (ADVO-1331-SBC-MKS) | Aurangzeb Laghari(ADVO-711-SBC-MKS) | Family Suit-Recovery of Maintenance,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article |   FAMILY SUIT NO: 100 / 2025 MST: NOUSHEEN ABBASI.V/S.MUHAMMAD SHAHID ABBASI. Family Suit called. Plaintiff is called absent while her learned counsel Mr. Imran Ashraf Panhwar is present. Defendant and his learned counsel are called absent.Today matter is fixed for filing written statement. Today order passed on separate sheet. Announced in open court. As per order the defendant is hereby debarred from filing written statement. Let the matter be proceeded pre-trial proceedings. Matter put off to.....20-11-2025 for Pre-Trial.  | 
  |
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Pre-Trial | |||||||
| 4 | F.S. (Family Suits) 126/2025 | MST: SULTANA BANO. VS NAZEER HUSSAIN. | Rafique Ahmed(ADVO-153-SBC-JMS) | Muhammad Iqbal(Adenda) | Family Suit-Dissolution of Muslim marriage act, 1939,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article |   FAMILY SUIT NO: 126 / 2025 MST: SULTANA BANO.V/S.NAZEER HUSSAIN. Family Suit called. Plaintiff and her learned counsel are called absent his pleader clerk is present. Defendant is called absent while his learned junior counsel Mr. Sufyan Sulleman is present. Today matter is fixed for Pre-Trial. Matter adjourned last and final chance. Put off to........20-11-2025 for Pre-Trial.  | 
  |
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 5 | F.S. (Family Suits) 40/2025 | MST: SIDRA. VS MUHAMMAD ATIF. | Jamshed(ADVO-583-SBC-MKS) | Rashid Ali() | Family Suit-Recovery of Maintenance,Family Suit-Restitution of Conjugal Rights |   FAMILY SUIT NO: 40 / 2025 MST: SIDRA.V/S.MUHAMMAD ATIF. Family Suit called. Plaintiff and her learned counsel Mr. Jamshed Locus are called absent. Defendant is called absent while his learned counsel Mr. Rashid Ali Shah is present. Today matter is fixed for plaintiff evidence. Today learned counsel for defendant filed application for adjournment at Ex: 17. Order on it. Granted as last chance. Matter put off to......20-11-2025 for plaintiff evidence. Both parties counsels are directed to lead their evidence on the next date of hearing.  | 
  |
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Compliance | |||||||
| 6 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 5/2023 | Rani Samual VS Micheal | Sajad Hussain (ADVO-154-SBC-TAY) | Jamshed(ADVO-583-SBC-MKS) | Family Execution-Execution Application |   FAMILY EXECUTION APPLN: NO: 05 / 2023 RANI SAMUAL.V/S.MICHEL. Misc: Application U/O 21 Rule 37 C.P.C, R/W rule 38 of C.P.C, in Misc: Application called. Plaintiff / D.H Mst: Rani Samual and her learned counsel are present. Defendant / J.D namely Michel is present. Mr. Jamshed Locus advocate for defendant / J.D is called absent. Today defendant / J.D namely Michel is deposited the installment of reaming maintenance amount of Rs: 8000/- with Reader. Today learned counsel plaintiff / D.H filed statement alongwith photo copy judgment dated: 09-05-2018 passed by the court of honourable Additional Sessions Judge-II / MCAC, Mirpurkhas in family Appeal No: 15 of 2018. Order on it. File. Matter put off to....05-12-2025 for compliance and depositing the remaining maintenance amount on the next date of hearing without fail.  | 
  |