SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE / ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE I, MIRPURKHAS : 12-MAR-2026

S.NO. CASE NO NAME OF PARTIES ADVOCATES UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS FIR No. Hearing Status
Party Side 1 Party Side 2

CIVIL JURISDICTION

S.NO. CASE NO NAME OF PARTIES ADVOCATES Hearing Status
Party Side 1 Party Side 2
CIVIL JURISDICTION Compliance
1 C.Ex. (Civil Executions) 6/2021
Feroz Hussain VS Khalid Hussain & Others   Nabi Bux Narejo(ADVO-404-SBC-MKS)  

12-03-2026. Application U/s 151 CPC in F.C Execution Application called. The plaintiff/DH is called absent. Learned counsel for plaintiff/DH is called absent. The defendants/JDs are called absent. Show cause Notice issued against defendant/JD No.11 Mukhtiarkar(Rev) Taluka Digri returned served from the court of SCJ Digri. Order on it. Muhammad Ramzan City Surveyor Digri appeared on behalf of4 Mukhtiarkar Digri & submitted reply of show cause notice with authority letter stated that matter pertain to Taluka Jhudo. Order on it. Advocate decree holder be heard. Put off to-------30-03-2026 for compliance & advocate of decree holder to be heard.

2 C.Ex. (Civil Executions) 2/2022
Taro VS Abdul Latif & Others   Aftab Ali(ADVO-508-SBC-MKS)  

12-03-2026. F.C Execution Application called. Plaintiff / DH is present. Learned counsel for plaintiff/DH is present. Defendant/JD No.01 is called absent. None is present from the private defendant/JD side. Learned DDA for official defendants is present. Plaintiff/DH counsel filed statement stating therein defendant/JD Abdul Latif called in person for compliance of court orders. Order on it. Call him in person. Put up to--------02-04-2026 for compliance. Office is directed to issue notice to private defendant/JD No.01 namely Abdul Latif through concerned court as well as well as register post & TCS on costs.

3 C.Ex. (Civil Executions) 1/2024
Mst. Latifan VS Muhammad Ilyas   Muhammad Asif(ADVO-372-SBC-MKS)   Kamran Bhatti(ADVO-630-SBC-MKS)

12-03-2026. Matter called. The attorney of plaintiff/DH is present. Learned counsel for plaintiff/DH is present. The defendant/JDs are called absent. Learned counsel for defendant/JD No.02 is called absent. Learned DDA for official defendant is present. Mukhtiarkar Taluka Shujaabad & Assistant Commissioner Shujaabad are called absent but Tapedar Ghulam Mustafa of Mukhtiarkar Shujaabad is present & his verbal request matter is adjourned till next date. Put up to------17-03-2026 for compliance of decree. Assistant Commissioner & Mukhtiarkar Taluka Shujaabad are strictly directed to make compliance of decree & submit such details report by appearing in persons.

4 C.Ex. (Civil Executions) 6/2024
Aatam VS Ali Muhammad & ors   Abid Imam(ADVO-531-SBC-SGR)   Sintosh Kumar(ADVO-429-SBC-MKS) سماعت جاری ہے

12-03-2026. F.C Execution Application called. The plaintiff / DH No.01 / attorney of rest of plaintiffs / DHs Aatam is present. Learned counsel for plaintiff / DH is present. The defendants/JDs are called absent. Learned counsel for L.Rs of defendant/JD No.01(a) is called absent. Learned DDA for official defendants/JDs is present. Objections on means profit & application U/s 151 CPC for re-issuance of writ of possession still not filed by private defendants/JD side. Order passed on separate sheet & announced in open court. As Per Order. The private defendants/JDs hereby debarred from filling objections on means profit & application U/s 151 CPC for re-issuance of writ of possession. Put off to-------26-03-2026 for compliance & hearing in respect of mesne profits & hearing on application U/s 151 CPC for re-issuance of writ of possession.

5 C.Ex. (Civil Executions) 5/2024
Shoukat VS Mir Muhammad & ors   Muhammad Sultan(ADVO-1192-SBC-MKS)   Raja Mir Junaid Ahmed(ADVO-1036-SBC-MKS) سماعت جاری ہے

12-03-2026. F.C Execution Application called. Plaintiff/DH is present. Learned counsel for plaintiff/DH Mr. Muhammad Sultan Shoro is present. Defendant/JD No.06 is called absent. Learned counsel for defendant/JDs Mr. Mir Junaid is called absent. Learned DDA for official defendant/JDs is present. Plaintiff/DH counsel filed statement alongwith proposed draft sale deed through his statement. Order on it. COC/Nazir check & report. Put up to------18-03-2026 for compliance of Nazir/COC.

CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service
6 Ist Class Civil Suits 342/2012
Muhammad Siddque VS Mst: Shaheena   Mirza Saleem Baig(ADVO-123-SBC-SGR)   Muhammad Shoaib()

12-03-2026. Application U/s 12(2) CPC called. The attorney of applicant is called absent. Learned counsel for attorney of applicant is present. Opponents are called absent. None is appeared on behalf of L.Rs of opponent No.01 to 03. Notice issued against L.Rs of opponent No.01 (a & b) & opponent No.02 through SCJ-I Tando Adam & SCJ-I Karachi East not returned served or un-served. Applicant counsel filed statement alongwith receipts of couriers/result tracking receipts. Order on it. File. Put up to------26-03-2026 for service against L.Rs of opponent No.01 (a & b) & opponent No.02. Repeat notice to L.Rs of opponent No.01(a & b) & opponent No.02 through concerned court as well as TCS on costs.

CIVIL JURISDICTION For Evidence
7 Ist Class Civil Suits 205/2017
Raj Kumar VS M Yakoob and Others   Abdul Razaque Leghari(ADVO-309-SBC-MKS)   DDA(DDA-003-GOV-MPK),Ghulam Nabi (ADVO-512-SBC-MKS),Jawaid Choudhari(ADVO-8-SBC-MKS) سماعت جاری ہے

12-03-2026. Matter called. The attorney of plaintiff is called absent. Learned counsel for plaintiff is present. The defendants are called absent except defendant No.13 who is present. Learned counsel for defendant No:01 to 07 remained called absent. Learned counsel for defendants No:14 to 18 is called absent. Leaned counsel for defendant No:13 is called absent. Learned DDA on behalf of official defendants is present. Costs of 1000/- still not deposited by plaintiff side in District Court Dispensary. Notice issued upon official witnesses of defendant No.13 Sub Registrar Mps & Mukhtiarkar Taluka HBM returned served & they are present. Learned counsel for defendant No.13 sent statement through defendant No.13 in respect of closed his side of evidence of defendant No.13 at Ex:101. Order on it. File. Order passed on separate sheet & announced in open court. As Per Order. The side of the evidence of remaining defendants/witnesses is hereby closed. Put up to---------24-03-2026 for final arguments.

8 Ist Class Civil Suits 130/2015
LACHMAN DAS AND OTHERS VS MUKHTIARKAR (R) MPS AND ANOTHER   Gian(ADVO-143-SBC-MKS)   DDA(DDA-003-GOV-MPK),Muhammad Zaman (ADVO-1184-SBC-MKS)

12-03-2026. Matter called. The attorney of plaintiffs Haresh is present. Learned counsel for plaintiff Mr. Gian is called absent. The defendants are called absent. The learned counsel for defendant No.07 to 11 Mr. Choudhry Zaman is called absent. Learned DDA on behalf of official defendants is present. Objections on application U/o 18 rule 17 CPC still not filed by plaintiff counsel. Mr. Afzal Karim Virk advocate previous counsel of defendant No.07 to 11 appeared & filed application U/o 15 rule with affidavit praying therein to decide legal issues regarding maintainability of instant suit at Ex:157 & Ex:158. Order on it. As Per Order. Learned counsel is directed to satisfied the court in terms that whether his power is still in field or not keeping in view that a fresh power has been filed by another advocate. Put up to---------16-03-2026 for evidence of defendant side as very last & final chance & filling of objections on application U/o 18 rule 17 CPC by plaintiff side.

9 Ist Class Civil Suits 159/2017
Muhammad Ashraf VS Aamir Hameed and others   Ahmed Nawaz Khan(ADVO-715-SBC-MKS)   Tahseen Ahmed(ADVO-339-SBC-MKS) سماعت جاری ہے

12-03-2026. Matter called. Plaintiff is present. Learned counsel for plaintiff Mr. Ahmad Nawaz Khan is present. Defendants are called absent except defendant No.01 who is present. Learned counsel for defendants Mr. Tehseen Ahmed Qureshi is present. Arguments on application U/o 14 rule 05 CPC heard from both side. Order passed on separate sheet & announced in open court. As Per Order. Matter called. The plaintiff is present. Learned counsel for the plaintiff also called present. Defendant No.01 is also present. Learned counsel for the defendant is also called present. Today, the matter is fixed for further cross-examination of plaintiff by defendant side as very last and final chance and hearing on application U/o 14 rule 05 C.P.C. Learned counsel for the private defendants disclosed that the Judgment and decree passed in civil appeal No.95/2013 vide dated:20-12-2016 have been suspended by Honourable High Court of Sindh, Circuit Court Mirpurkhas in 2nd Civil Appeal No.S-80/2024 (Re: Abdul Hameed Through L.Rs Versus Muhammad Ashraf and others) vide order dated:09-03-2026. Hence, he argued that he will not conduct further cross-examination to the Plaintiff. He was directed to conduct the further cross-examination to the plaintiff but he refused and shown his unwillingness by saying that he will not conduct further cross-examination to the plaintiff by saying that the proceedings have been suspended by the Honourable High Court of Sindh in aforesaid matter which is directly connected with this matter. It is pertinent to mention here that the matter in which proceedings have been suspended by the Honourable High Court of Sindh, is a separate matter while this is a separate suit filed by the plaintiff. He read out the contents of order of Honourable High court of Sindh on his mobile phone but nowhere mentioned therein that proceedings in the instant matter have been suspended. It is pertinent to mention here that examination in chief of plaintiff was recorded on 25-08-2021; however, his cross-examination was reserved in the interest of Justice due to absence of defendant side. Thereafter, the first cross-examination of the plaintiff was conducted on 07-05-2024 and meanwhile the matter was adjourned sine-die by learned predecessor of this court on 07-05-2024. The record reveals that further cross-examination of the plaintiff was again recorded on 20-03-2024 and it was again reserved upon request of learned counsel for the defendant. Thereafter, the cross-examination was further recorded on 04-03-2026 and further cross-examination of the plaintiff was again reserved upon own request of learned counsel for the defendants but now the learned counsel for the defendants is reluctant to conduct further cross-examination to the plaintiff as he has clearly refused and shown his unwillingness to conduct and complete the further cross-examination to the plaintiff only on the ground as mentioned above. The ground for not conducting the further cross-examination, as taken by learned counsel for defendants seems to be illogical and meritless. In view of aforesaid position, further cross-examination of plaintiff is hereby declared Nil though sufficient chances extended. Arguments on application U/o 14 rule 05 CPC heard from respective sides let the matter be fixed for evidence of witnesses of plaintiff and order on application. As this court has been declared as Model Civil Trial Court for expeditious disposal of old chronic cases. The instant matter is also one of the old case. Therefore, in order to save time of the court, plaintiff side is directed to file affidavit in evidence of witnesses till next date. Put up to--------17-03-2026 for evidence of plaintiff witnesses & order on application U/s 14 rule 05 CPC.

CIVIL JURISDICTION For Final Arguments
10 Ist Class Civil Suits 3/2026
MIR HASSAN BHURGHARI. VS MST: MEHAR BIBI & OTHERS.   Rana Rahil Mehmood(ADVO-457-SBC-MKS)   Haresh Kumar(ADVO-19696-SBC-KHS) سماعت جاری ہے

12-03-2026. Matter called. The plaintiff is present. Learned counsel for plaintiff is present. The defendants are called absent. Learned counsel for defendant No.01 is present. Learned DDA on behalf of official defendants is present. Application U/o 148 CPC for adjournment filed by learned counsel for plaintiff at Ex:77 on the ground that Civil Revision No.15/2026 allowed on 02-03-2026 & order of this court recalled. Order on it. File. Order passed on separate sheet & announced in open court. As Per Order. Matter called. Learned counsel for the defendant appeared in the morning. Later on learned counsel for the plaintiff along with the plaintiff appeared and filed application for adjournment by stating therein that his Civil Revision bearing No.15/2026 has been allowed by the Honourable Revisional Court on dated:02-03-2026 and order of this court dated:28-02-2026 has been recalled. He has annexed the copy of diary sheet/ case diary of the said revisional court printed from CFMS system which depicts that the revision has been disposed of in terms of the order. But copy of said order has not been produced/ procured by learned counsel for the plaintiff. In view of above said statement/ contention of learned counsel for the plaintiff, it appears that the above said civil Revision filed by him has been allowed hence, let the matter be fixed for cross-examination of defendant and her witnesses by the plaintiff side with clear directions to proceed with the matter till next date failing which any appropriate order shall be passed. It is clarified that the cross-examination of defendant and her witnesses shall be subject to the terms and conditions of the order of revisional court. The learned counsel for the plaintiff is directed to submit the certified true copy of Honourable Revisional Court till next date. Let the matter be fixed on-------17-03-2026 for cross-examination of defendant and her witnesses.