| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | Ist Class Civil Suits 23/2024 |
Muhammad Ali & Others VS Mst. Atiya & Others | Muhammad Asif(ADVO-372-SBC-MKS) | Afzal Karim() | 30-01-2026. Matter called. The plaintiff & his learned counsel are called absent. Plaintiff witness Muhammad Akram is also called absent. The defendants are called absent. Learned counsel for private defendants Mr. Afzal Karaim is called absent his junior is present. Learned DDA for official defendants is present. Application U/o 148 CPC for adjournment sent by plaintiff counsel through his clerk with no objections junior of defendant counsel at Ex:97. Order on it. File. Order passed on separate sheet & announced in open court. As Per Order. I intent to dispose of instant adjournment application moved by learned counsel for the plaintiff which was not objected by learned counsel for the private defendants. The record reveals that the examination in chief of plaintiff and his witness was recorded long ago but their cross-examination was reserved due to absence of counsel for defendant No:01. Since then, the matter is being repeatedly fixed and adjourned to several dates for cross-examination of the plaintiff and his witnesses but perusal of record reveals that sometimes the plaintiff side remains absent and sometimes the defendant side used to moved frequent adjournments applications. Today, matter was called since morning but neither the plaintiff and his witness, nor his counsel were present so also learned counsel for the private defendant No:01 was also called absent except his junior associate. Later on, at about 11:45 A.M the plaintiff side sent instant adjournment application on the ground of illness of plaintiff and Junior associate of learned counsel of the private defendant put his no objection on it. No supporting medical document been annexed with the present application to justify the illness ground of plaintiff. The record reveals that on last date the plaintiff and defendant side adopted same practice as the plaintiff side moved adjournment application which was not objected by defendant side; however, such adjournment application was granted, in the interest of justice and last and final chance extended to defendant side for conducting cross-examination to the plaintiff and his witness. But today, the plaintiff side itself remained absent and did not bother to appear in the court. It appears that both the plaintiff and defendant side are in league by moving adjournment application with no objection of defendant side. Such conduct could not be tolerated in future and the same is not worth appreciating. Record reveals that matter has been repeatedly adjourned and fixed to number of dates for cross-examination of plaintiff and his witnesses but the same has not been conducted due to default of other side. Nevertheless, instant application is hereby granted. As no medical document been annexed with present application to show that plaintiff is really ill or not thus cost of Rs.1,000/- is hereby imposed on plaintiff with direction to deposit the same till next date before Nazir of this court and the same shall thereon be deposited in District Court Dispensary on proper receipt. Looking through the lethargic conduct of both sides it is hereby clearly directed to both sides to appear and proceed with the matter till next date failing which any adverse order shall be passed against the defaulting party being very last and final chance. Matter adjourned to 31-01-2026 at 09:00 A.M. sharp, for cross-examination of plaintiff and his witness & also deposit costs of Rs.2000/-on next date of hearing. |
||
| 2 | Ist Class Civil Suits 99/2023 |
Zubair Ahmed VS Province of Sindh & Ors | Waheed Ali() | DDA(DDA-003-GOV-MPK),Nabi Bux Narejo(ADVO-404-SBC-MKS) | سماعت جاری ہے 30-01-2026. F.C Suit called. The plaintiff is present. Learned counsel for plaintiff is present. The defendants are called absent. Learned counsel for private defendants is present. Learned DDA for official defendant is present. Costs of Rs;2000/- imposed on application U/o 09 rule 09 CPC still not deposited by the plaintiff side. Application U/o 13 & 16 rule 01 & 02 CPC alongwith affidavit filed by learned counsel for defendant No.02 & 03 at Ex:45 to Ex:48 respectively. Order on it. Notice to other side. Copies received by plaintiff counsel. Put off to----------31-01-2026 for evidence of defendant side & filling of objections on application U/o 12 & 16 rule 01 02 CPC by the plaintiff side & depositing costs of Rs;2000/- as last chance to plaintiff. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 3 | Ist Class Civil Suits 90/2012 |
RUSTAM ALI VS MUKHTIARKAR | Rana Rahil Mehmood(ADVO-457-SBC-MKS) | DDA(DDA-003-GOV-MPK) | 30-01-2026. Application U/s 12 (2) CPC called. Applicant is called absent. Learned DDA on behalf of applicant is present. The L.Rs of plaintiff / Respondent No.01 is called absent. Learned counsel for plaintiff / respondent No.01 is called absent. The opponent/ respondent No.02 & 03 are called absent. Further arguments heard from learned DDA. Order passed on separate sheet & announced in open court. As Per Order. The instant application U/s 12(2) CPC is hereby dismissed with no order as to costs. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Final Arguments | |||||||
| 4 | Ist Class Civil Suits 129/2016 |
Mohammad Bux and others VS The Deputy Director Poultry Mps and others | Gian(ADVO-143-SBC-MKS) | DDA(DDA-003-GOV-MPK) | 30-01-2026. Matter called. The attorney of plaintiff is called absent. Learned counsel for plaintiff is present. The defendants are called absent. Learned DDA for official defendants is present. Schedule of this case already prepared by this court with consent of both parties. Further arguments heard from learned DDA. Judgment passed & announced in open court. As Per Judgment at Ex:109. The suit of plaintiff is hereby decreed with no order as to costs. Let the decree be prepared accordingly. |
||