| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Amended Title of Plaint. | |||||||
| 1 | Ist Class Civil Suits 297/2012 |
Abdul Ghaffar VS Abdul Razzak | Javed Ahmed Qazi(ADVO-13711-SBC-KHS) | Rana Rahil Mehmood(ADVO-457-SBC-MKS) | سماعت جاری ہے 14-02-2026. Matter called. This suit is main leading suit consolidated with F.C Suit No.305/2012. The plaintiff is present. Learned counsel for plaintiff is called absent. The defendant No:01 is present. Learned counsel for defendant No.01 Mr. Rana Raheel is present. Amended plaint filed by plaintiff Abdul Razzak through his learned counsel in consolidated suit. Order on it. Copy to other side. Copy received by plaintiff himself. Objections on application U/s 151 CPC still not filed by plaintiff side. Put off to-------18-02-2026 for filling of amended W/S by defendant side in consolidated suit & filling of objections on application U/s 151 CPC by the plaintiff side. |
||
| 2 | Ist Class Civil Suits 305/2012 |
Mst: Khatoon VS Abdul Ghaffar | Rana Rahil Mehmood(ADVO-457-SBC-MKS) | Abdul Rauf Arain(ADVO-252-SBC-MKS),Javed Ahmed Qazi(ADVO-13711-SBC-KHS) | سماعت جاری ہے 14-02-2026. Matter called. This suit is consolidated with main leading F.C Suit No.297/2012. The plaintiff No.02/attorney of rest of plaintiffs is present. Learned counsel for plaintiffs is present. The defendant is present. Learned counsel for defendant is present. Amended plaintiff filed by attorney of plaintiffs through his learned counsel at Ex:78. Order on it. As Per Order. Copy to other side. Copy received by defendant himself. Put off to-------18-02-2026 for filling of amended W/S by the defendant side. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION Compliance | |||||||
| 3 | C.Ex. (Civil Executions) 39/2013 |
Choudhry Ibrahim VS Mukhtiarkar ( R) Mps & Others | 14-02-2026. F.C. Execution application called. The attorney of plaintiff/DH is remained called absent since long. Learned counsel for plaintiff/DH is also called absent since long. The defendant/JDs are called absent. Learned counsel for defendant/JD is called absent. Order passed on separate sheet & announced in open court. As Per Order. Virtue of aforesaid position The conduct of the plaintiff/DH & his learned counsel shows that they have lost their interest in the present application, hence the instant application filed by plaintiff/DH is hereby dismissed in non prosecution with no order as to costs. |
||||
| 4 | C.Ex. (Civil Executions) 22/2014 |
ABDUL KHALIQUE AND OTHERS VS SAEED KHAN AND OTHERS | Mujeeb Ur Rehman (ADVO-487-SBC-MKS) | 14-02-2026. F.C Execution application called. Attorney of plaintiff/DH Agedino is called absent. Learned counsel of attorney of plaintiff/DH is called absent. The defendants/JDs are called absent. Learned counsel for L.Rs of defendant/JD No. 01(i to iv) is called absent. The proceedings of this matter already stayed by the Hon'ble ADJ-II Mps & no further orders or direction is received. Put off to--------06-03-2026 for further proceedings / receiving of order from appellate court. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION Compliance | |||||||
| 5 | C.Ex. (Civil Executions) 5/2023 |
Muhammad Hussain VS Mst Shakeela & ors | Muhammad Noordin(ADVO-670-SBC-MKS) | Muhammad Qaim(),Nadeem(ADVO-542-SBC-MKS) | 14-02-2026. F.C Execution Application called. Plaintiff/D.H is called absent. Learned counsel for plaintiff/DH is called absent. Defendant/JD is called absent. Learned counsel for private defendant/JDs is called absent. Learned DDA for official defendant/J.Ds is present. Original R & Ps of this Execution application still lying with the Court of Hon'ble ADJ-II / MCAC Mirpurkhas which called in Civil Appeal No.13/2025 Re-Ghulam Nabi & Ors V/s Muhammad Hussain & Ors. Put off to----------06-03-2026 for return of R & Ps from the Appellate Court / compliance the order passed by this Court & arguments on application U/s 151 CPC. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION Compliance | |||||||
| 6 | C.Ex. (Civil Executions) 6/2024 |
Aatam VS Ali Muhammad & ors | Abid Imam(ADVO-531-SBC-SGR) | Sintosh Kumar(ADVO-429-SBC-MKS) | 14-02-2026. F.C Execution Application called. The plaintiff / DH No.01 / attorney of rest of plaintiffs / DHs Aatam is present. Learned counsel for plaintiff / DH is present. The defendants/JDs are called absent. Learned counsel for L.Rs of defendant/JD No.01(a) is called absent. Learned DDA for official defendants/JDs is called absent. Show cause notice & notice on application U/s 151 CPC for re-issuance of writ of possessions issued against remaining private defendants/JDs returned served by pasting without presence of witnesses as per bailiff report. Order on it. Repeat it. Objections on application U/s 151 CPC still not filed by learned counsel for L.Rs of defendant No.01(a). In the interest of justice as last chance to L.Rs of defendant No.01(a) to file objection on application U/s 151 CPC matter is adjourned till next date. Put off to-------27-02-2026 for further compliance in respect of mesne profits & filling objections on application U/s 151 CPC for re-issuance of writ of possession. Repeat show cause notice to remaining defendants/JDs for non payment of mesne profits as well as notice on application U/s 151 CPC for re-issuance of writ of possessions against remaining defendants/JD by way of pasting in presence of two witnesses as before on costs. |
||
| 7 | Ist Class Civil Suits 140/2024 |
Mst. Ishrat Begum Through Attorney Asif Anwar VS Mst. Shafqat Rajput & Others | Muhammad Ali(ADVO-567-SBC-MKS) | DDA(DDA-003-GOV-MPK) | 14-02-2026. Matter called. The attorney of applicant/plaintiff Asif Anwar is remained called absent. Learned counsel for applicant / plaintiff is also called absent. The opponents / defendants are called absent. List of legal heirs of deceased defendant No.01/amended tittle sheet not filed by plaintiff side. In the interest of justice as last chance to plaintiff side to file list of L.Rs of defendant No.01/amended tittle sheet matter is adjourned till next date. Put off to-------21-02-2026 for filling of list of L.Rs of deceased defendant No.01/amended tittle sheet by the plaintiff side as last chance. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 8 | Ist Class Civil Suits 351/2014 |
MST. SHAMIM AND OTHERS VS NADEEM ABBAS AND OTHERS | Muhammad Asif(ADVO-372-SBC-MKS) | Araz Muhammad(ADVO-1009-SBC-MKS),Rana Rahil Mehmood(ADVO-457-SBC-MKS) | 14-02-2026. Matter called. This is main leading suit consolidated with F.C Suit No.181/2016. The plaintiff No.01 is present. Learned counsel for plaintiffs is present. The defendants are called absent. Learned counsel for private defendants is present. Learned DDA for official defendant is present. Official witness of defendant Mr. Muhammad Ayaz Abbasi Assistant Suptd: Nadra Mps is present & directed to attend on next date. Application U/o 148 CPC for adjournment filed by learned counsel for private defendant at Ex:133 on the ground that defendant Irshad reached at Karachi today but could not be attend this court to produce his travel history. Order on it. As Per Order. Heard perused. Matter adjourned in the interest of justice with direction to defendant side to proceed with the matter till next date failing which any appropriate order shall be passed as last & final chance. Put up to---------19-02-2026 for evidence of defendant side as last & final chance. |
||
| 9 | Ist Class Civil Suits 3/2026 |
MIR HASSAN BHURGHARI. VS MST: MEHAR BIBI & OTHERS. | Rana Rahil Mehmood(ADVO-457-SBC-MKS) | Haresh Kumar(ADVO-19696-SBC-KHS) | سماعت جاری ہے 14-02-2026. Matter called. The plaintiff is present. learned counsel for plaintiff is present. The defendants are called absent. Learned counsel for defendant No.01 is present. Learned DDA on behalf of official defendants is present. Summons issued upon official witness of defendants record keeper of SCJ-II Mps returned served & he is present. The cross examination of defendant No.01 & his witnesses already declared as Nil. Examination in chief of official witness/record keeper of SCJ-II Mps namely Khair Muhammad is recorded at Ex: 71. Learned counsel for defendant No.01 recorded his no objections on application of plaintiff side U/s 151 CPC for re-opining the side of evidence of defendant for cross examination. Order passed on separate sheet & announced in open court. As Per Order. The instant application is hereby allowed subject to payment of costs of4 Rs:1000/- to be deposited in the District Court Dispensary on proper receipts till the next date by the plaintiff. The plaintiff side is strictly directed to conduct the cross examination of defendant No.01 & her witnesses till next date only failing which any appropriate order shall be passed. The application stands disposed of accordingly. Put up to--------23-02-2026 for cross examination of defendant & her witnesses by the plaintiff side. Learned counsel for defendant is directed to ensure attendance of defendant No.01 & her witnesses on next date positively. |
||
| 10 | Ist Class Civil Suits 181/2016 |
Mst. Shamim VS Muhammad Arif and others | Muhammad Asif(ADVO-372-SBC-MKS) | Rana Rahil Mehmood(ADVO-457-SBC-MKS) | 14-02-2026. F.C suit called. This suit is consolidated with main leading suit No.351/2014. The attendance of parties & their learned counsel recorded in main leading suit. Put up to---------19-02-2026 for evidence in leading suit. |
||
| 11 | Commercial- Suit 1/2021 |
Zahid Ali Khan VS Mrs Ruqqiyya Nighat Usman | Jawad Ahmed Qureshi(ADVO-3386-SBC-HYD) | Abdul Rauf Arain(ADVO-252-SBC-MKS),Nizamuddin Pirzada(ADVO-96-SBC-MKS) | 14-02-2026. Matter called. The attorney of plaintiff & his learned counsel Mr. Mubashir Ahmed are called absent. The L.Rs of defendant are called absent. Learned counsel for L.Rs of defendant 01 & 04 Mr. Abdul Rauf Arain is called absent his junior is present. Learned counsel for L.Rs of defendant No.03 & 05 Mr. Nizamuddin Pirzada is called absent. The L.Rs of defendant No.02 already debarred from filling W/S & C.A & proceeded exparte. Order passed on separate sheet & announced in open court. As Per Order. Perusal of the record reveals that the matter is presently fixed for plaintiff side evidence and for orders on two separate applications filed under Order VII Rule 11 C.P.C. It further appears that an application under Order VII Rule 11 C.P.C. was earlier filed by learned counsel for defendants No. 03 and 05, on which notice was issued and objections have already been filed by the plaintiff side. Subsequently, another application under the same provision was filed by learned counsel for defendants No. 01 and 04, which was fixed for hearing on the question of its maintainability. Learned counsel for defendants No. 01 and 04 advanced his arguments on the previous date, and the matter was thereafter fixed for orders on the said issue. However, upon careful consideration, this Court is of the view that it would be just, fair, and proper to decide both applications simultaneously on merits, as they arise out of the same suit and are based upon similar legal grounds. Separate decisions on the two applications may lead to inconsistent findings and unnecessary multiplicity of proceedings. Since objections have already been filed on the earlier application, but no objections have yet been filed on the subsequent application, therefore it will be appropriate to afford an opportunity to the plaintiff side to file objections / counter affidavit to the later application as well, so that both matters may be adjudicated comprehensively. Accordingly, ordered passed on later application as, ?Notice to plaintiff side?. The earlier application under Order VII Rule 11 C.P.C. filed by defendants No. 03 and 05 shall be fixed for re-hearing from both sides on the relevant legal points. The subsequent application under Order VII Rule 11 C.P.C filed by defendants No. 01 and 04 shall be fixed for filing of objections by the plaintiff side. Till the disposal of the aforesaid applications, the matter shall remain fixed on CFMS for hearing of these applications only. The matter shall be fixed for plaintiff side evidence only after disposal of both applications. The Reader of the Court is directed to fix the matter accordingly in the CFMS system. Ordered accordingly. Put of to---------18-02-2026 for plaintiff evidence & hearing on application U/o 07 rule 11 CPC (Ex:120) filed by learned counsel for L.Rs of defendant No.03 & 05 & filling of objections on application U/o 07 rule 11 CPC (Ex:122) filed by L.Rs of defendant No.01 & 04 by the plaintiff side. |
||
| 12 | Commercial- Suit 1/2025 |
Muhammad Asif VS Muhammad Kashif & Others | Muhammad Asif(ADVO-372-SBC-MKS) | DDA(DDA-003-GOV-MPK),Muhammad Qaim() | سماعت جاری ہے 14-02-2026. Commercial suit called. The plaintiff is present. Learned counsel for plaintiff is present. The defendant No.01 is present. Learned counsel for defendant No.01 is present. Learned DDA for official defendants No.02 to 03 is called absent. Costs of Rs:1000/- still not deposited by the defendant No.01 for District Court Dispensary. Deposition of defendant No.01 Muhmmad Kashif is recorded at Ex:35. Learned counsel for defendant No.01 closed the side of his evidence under his statement at Ex:36. Order on it. As Per Order. File. Pup to------19-02-2026 for final arguments. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Hearing of Applications | |||||||
| 13 | IInd Class Civil Suits 1/2017 |
Mst.Afsheen VS Babar Hussain | Rana Rahil Mehmood(ADVO-457-SBC-MKS) | 14-02-2026. Application U/s 12(2) CPC called. The applicant is called absent since long. Learned counsel for applicant is called absent since long. The opponents are called absent. Learned counsel for opponent is present. Last chance already given to both side to proceed with the matter. Order passed on separate sheet & announced in open court. As Per Order. Virtue of aforesaid position The conduct of the applicant & his learned counsel shows that they have lost their interest in the present application, hence the instant application U/s 12 (2) CPC filed by the applicant is hereby dismissed in non prosecution with no order as to costs. |
|||