| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION Compliance | |||||||
| 1 | C.Ex. (Civil Executions) 14/2024 |
Municipal Committee Mirpurkhas VS Attaullah Khan & Ors | Abdul Rauf Arain(ADVO-252-SBC-MKS) | Sintosh Kumar(ADVO-429-SBC-MKS) | F.C Execution application called. The authorized person of plaintiff/DH called absent. Learned Associate counsel for plaintiff/DH is present. The defendants called absent. Learned counsel for L.Rs of defendant/JD No.01Mr. Santosh Kalal advocate is present. Learned DDA for official defendants No.02 to 04 is present. Last chance already given to the plaintiff/DH side to proceed with the matter. Application for issue of sale certificate u/s 151 CPC is heard, perused and order passed on it. Matter is adjourned and put up to--------------27-7-2026 for compliance & Service upon application U/s 151 CPC( pray for issuance of sale certificate). Issue Notice to J.D side upon Application u/s 151 CPC praying therein for issuance of sale-certificate, on cost of D.H. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 2 | Ist Class Civil Suits 37/2024 |
Muhammad Farooque VS Mrs. Hameeda Begum | Ghulam Nabi (ADVO-512-SBC-MKS) | Abdul Rauf Arain(ADVO-252-SBC-MKS) | F.C suit called. The plaintiff is present. Learned counsel for plaintiff Mr. Ghulam Nabi Meo advocate is present. The defendants called absent. Learned counsel for defendant No.01 Mr. Abdul Rauf Arain advocate called absent, his associate counsel is present. Notice against subsequent purchaser / defendant No.02 by way of publication in any prominent newspapers having wide circulation not get published by plaintiff side. Amended W.S still not filed by defendant No.01 & official defendant No.03 to 07 & last & final chance already provide to them. Objections on application U/o 06 rule 16 R/W Section 151 CPC not filed by plaintiff side. Application U/o 148 CPC for grant of time on behalf of plaintiff, to get publish the Notice of publication in prominent newspaper, filed by learned counsel for plaintiff at Ex.no. 31, order passed on it, matter is adjourned in the interest of justice. Put up to-------------21-7-2026 for service upon subsequent purchaser / defendant No.02 by way of publication & filling of amended W/S by defendant No.01 & official defendants as very last & final chance & filling of objections on application U/o 06 rule 16 CPC by plaintiff side. Repeat summons upon subsequent purchaser / defendant No.02 by way of publication in any prominent newspapers having wide circulation, on costs of plaintiff. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 3 | Commercial- Civil Execution 1/2026 |
Muhammad Asif VS Muhammad Kashif & ors | Muhammad Asif(ADVO-372-SBC-MKS) | Matter called. Learned counsel for the plaintiff is present. Learned counsel for defendant No.01 filed objections on application U/o 08 rule 09 CPC which were adopted by learned counsel for defendant No.06 and 07 through such separate statements. Copy supplied/ received by learned counsel for plaintiff. Remaining defendants are debarred from filing the objections on it. Put up on 15-07-2026 for hearing on application U/o 08 rule 09 CPC and evidence of plaintiff side. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 4 | Ist Class Civil Suits 277/2015 |
MUHAMMAD ISMAIL KHAN VS MST. JAMEELA AND OTHERS | Faisal(ADVO-501-SBC-MKS) | Ahmed Nawaz Khan(ADVO-715-SBC-MKS),Rana Rahil Mehmood(ADVO-457-SBC-MKS) | Matter called. Learned counsel for plaintiff is present. Plaintiff No.01 (i) is present. Learned counsel for the defendant for defendant No.02 is present along with Affaque. Arguments on application U/o 23 rule 03 CPC heard partly from both sides. Matter adjourned on verbal request of both sides on the ground that plaintiff side will produce remaining plaintiffs in terms of compromise application. Put up on 20-07-2026 for hearing on compromise application and appearance of remaining plaintiffs in terms of compromise application. |
||
| 5 | Ist Class Civil Suits 7/2026 |
Muhammad Hussain through L.Rs & Ors VS Mirza Imran Mughal & ors | Rana Rahil Mehmood(ADVO-457-SBC-MKS) | DDA(DDA-003-GOV-MPK),Gian(ADVO-143-SBC-MKS) | Matter called. Learned counsel for the plaintiff called absent. The plaintiff / attorney of plaintiff No.01 (a) Salman is present. Witness Ghulam Shakir is present. Learned counsel for the defendant No.01 is present. Matter called repeatedly on different intervals, 01:24 P.M but learned counsel for the plaintiff failed to appear while the witness Ghulam Shakir is present since morning. The aforesaid attorney/ plaintiff Muhammad Salman filed application and prayed verbally that time / date may be granted to him and assuring in it that he will produce his counsel and remaining witnesses on 15-07-2026 at 11:00 A.M, in case of his failure he will have no objection on whatever proceedings/ order of the court and also he has no objection if the court records statement/ evidence of Ghulam Shakir. Put up on 15-07-2026 at 11:00 A.M. Parties are directed to appear on next date at 11:00 A.M sharp and to proceed with the matter, failing which any appropriate order shall be passed. |
||
| 6 | Ist Class Civil Suits 11/2026 |
Nafees Jahan VS Mst. Zareena Fatima & Ors | Rana Rahil Mehmood(ADVO-457-SBC-MKS) | Ali (ADVO-754-SBC-MKS),Asif(ADVO-470-SBC-MKS) | F.C suit called. Both L.Rs of plaintiff called absent. Learned counsel for plaintiff Mr. Rana Rahil advocate called absent, his Associate counsel Mr. Raja Tanveer Ahmad advocate is present. The defendants are called absent except Zeeshan Ahmad Shaikh, who is L.R of defendant No. 2(b), & so also the attorney of defendants No.01 & 02 is present. Learned counsel for L.R of defendant No. 2(b) Mr. Ali Mehr advocate is present. Learned counsel for defendant No.03 Mr. Asif Choudhry advocate called absent. The defendant No.04 to 06 already debarred from filling of W/S & objections & proceeded exparte. Examination-in-chief of Shaikh Zeeshan Ahmad, the L.R of defendant No.2(b) so also attorney of L.rs of defendants No.01 & 02 is recorded at Ex.no.93, his cross-examination is reserved. Order passed on order-sheet. As per order, Plaintiff called absent. Learned counsel for plaintiff also called absent. Defendant No.01/02 (b) namely Zeeshan Ahmad is present. Evidence of Defendant No.01 & 02 side recorded. No intimation or adjournment been moved from plaintiff side. Mr. Raja Tanveer advocate appeared and disclosed that learned counsel for plaintiff is not in his contact though he is dialing cell phone and informed that he intends to move adjournment application. None appeared from defendant No.03 side. Defendant No.04 to 06 are being proceeded ex-parte. Virtue of aforesaid position, cross-examination of defendant No.01 & 02 reserved in interest of justice as very last and final chance to plaintiff side to conduct cross-examination to defendant appropriate order shall be passed. Defendant No.03 is also extended very last and final chance to lead the evidence till next date. Put off to---------------------------------------------22-07-2026 for Evidence/cross-examination of defendant No.01 and 02, evidence of the witness, evidence of defendant No. 3 as very last and final chance, failing which any appropriate order shall be passed against defaulting party. |
||
| 7 | Ist Class Civil Suits 12/2026 |
Iftekhar Ahmed VS Zulfiqar Ahmed & Ors | Muhammad Asif(ADVO-372-SBC-MKS) | Abdul Rauf Arain(ADVO-252-SBC-MKS),DDA(DDA-002-GOV-MPK),Ghulam Nabi (ADVO-512-SBC-MKS),Kamran Bhatti(ADVO-630-SBC-MKS) | F.C suit called. Today, the matter is fixed for further examination-in-chief of defendant No.01/attorney of defendants No.04 to 06 and 08, and for evidence of the remaining defendants side. The plaintiff is present. Learned counsel for the plaintiff Mr. Asif Zai advocate is present. The defendants are called absent. Th learned counsel for the defendant Mr. Abdul Rauf Arain advocate associate is present. Rest learned counsels for the defendants called absent. The defendants witnesses are also called absent. Learned counsel for plaintiff filed application for adjournment, order passed on it. Order passed on Order-sheet. Matter is adjourned and put up to------------------------------------------------------ 20-07-2026 for further examination-in-chief of defendant No.01/attorney of defendants No.04 to 06 and 08, and for evidence of the remaining defendants side. The defendants side is strictly directed to lead evidence till next date, failing which any appropriate order shall be passed. |
||
| 8 | Ist Class Civil Suits 18/2026 |
MST: RAHEELA IQRAR & OTHERS.THROUGH SPL:ATTORNEY:MST: FARZANA BEGUM. VS IFTIKHAR AHMED & OTHERS. | Ghulam Nabi (ADVO-512-SBC-MKS) | Abdul Rauf Arain(ADVO-252-SBC-MKS),DDA(DDA-003-GOV-MPK),Kamran Bhatti(ADVO-630-SBC-MKS),Muhammad Asif(ADVO-372-SBC-MKS) | F.C suit called. This suit is consolidated with F.C. Suit No.12/2026. The attendance of parties & their learned counsel recorded in main leading suit. The leading suit is adjourned, hence this suit is also adjourned. put up to------------------------------------------------------------------------20-7-2026 for Evidence of defendant side. |
||
| 9 | Ist Class Civil Suits 15/2026 |
Manthar VS Saindino & Others | Nabi Bux Narejo(ADVO-404-SBC-MKS) | Khalid Hussain (ADVO-1060-SBC-MKS),Muhammad Qaim() | F.C suit called. Special Attorney of plaintiff namely Aijaz is present. Learned Associate counsel for plaintiff is present. Defendant No.01 Saindino & L.R No.4(i) (c) namely Ghulam Rasool are present. Learned counsel for private defendants Mr. Muhammad Qaim Pahore called absent, his associate counsel is present. Learned counsel for private defendants filed Application u/o XVI r 1 & 2 CPC R/W 151 CPC For permission to file list of witnesses, at Ex.no.88 along with affidavit of L.R no. 2(i) namely Rasool Bux, learned counsel for plaintiff endorsed his no objection upon it. Application U/o 148 CPC for adjournment filed by learned counsel for defendants at Ex:89, on the ground that his senior is busy before First Additional Sessions Court, Sanghar, Order passed on seprate-sheet. As Per Order, perusal of the adjournment application it reveals that the learned counsel for the defendant is busy before Court at Sanghar. Matter per diaries is fixed for evidence of defendant side. It is pertinent to mention that matter is being repeatedly adjourned from date to date for want of evidence of defendant side but defendant side has not bothered to lead their evidence. In this regard, earlier adjournment applications moved by defendant side were also granted. Today, instead of leading evidence, defendant side has again moved adjournment application without any supporting document which amounts to lingering on the matter unnecessarily, nevertheless, matter once again adjourned with direction to defendant side to lead their evidence ill next date, failing which any appropriate order shall be passed as last chance. Matter adjourned to---------------------------17-07-2026 with time fix at 09:00 A.M for defendant side evidence as last chance. Both sides are directed to make sure their attendance and proceed with the matter at 09:00 A.M without fail on next date failing which any appropriate order shall be passed. |
||
| 10 | Ist Class Civil Suits 25/2026 |
Abdul Aziz VS Jehangir & ors | Ahmed Nawaz Khan(ADVO-715-SBC-MKS) | Sintosh Kumar(ADVO-429-SBC-MKS) | F.C suit called. Plaintiff is present. Learned counsel for plaintiff Mr. Ahmad Nawaz Khan advocate is present. The defendant No.02 namely Obhayo caste Junejo is present. Defendant No.01 called absent. Learned counsel for both private defendants Mr. Santosh Kalal advocate is present. Objections on application U/o 16 rule 01 & 02 CPC, praying therein to grant permission to file list of witnesses, not filed by plaintiff counsel. Summons issued upon official witness Manager Habib Bank Ltd.of defendant returned served. Branch Manager Pardeep Kumar appeared and filed application u/s 148 CPC for grant of time on the ground that the required record could not be traced out in their office, order passed on it. Branch Manager Pardeep Kumar is bound-down for next date of hearing with strict direction to produce the required record without fail. Matter is adjourned and put up to-------------------------------------------15-07-2026 for Evidence of defendant side/ & filing objections on 16 rule 01 and 02 CPC by plaintiff side. Branch manger is bound-down with strict directions as mentioned in present diary. |
||
| 11 | Ist Class Civil Suits 19/2026 |
Muhammad Ilyas VS Kamran & Others | Gian(ADVO-143-SBC-MKS) | Ghulam Nabi (ADVO-512-SBC-MKS),Imran Ashraf(),Zahid Khalil(ADVO-538-SBC-MKS) | Matter called. Learned counsel for the plaintiff is present. Learned counsel for defendant No.01 filed objections on application U/o 08 rule 09 CPC which were adopted by learned counsel for defendant No.06 and 07 through such separate statements. Copy supplied/ received by learned counsel for plaintiff. Remaining defendants are debarred from filing the objections on it. Put up on 15-07-2026 for hearing on application U/o 08 rule 09 CPC and evidence of plaintiff side. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Hearing of Applications | |||||||
| 12 | C.Ex. (Civil Executions) 18/2023 |
Fateh Muhammad VS Mst. Hakeema & Ors | Dhanesh Kumar (ADVO-1082-SBC-MKS) | DDA(DDA-003-GOV-MPK) | F.C. Ex-application called. Attorney of plaintiff/DH Mr. Jhandal Shah advocate is present. Learned counsel for plaintiff/DH Mr. D.K Malhi advocate is present. Defendants/JDs are called absent. Learned DDA is present. Report of City Surveyor Mps already on record. On last dates of hearing, Order passed on separate sheet & announced in open court. As Per Order, matter fixed for hearing on application as well as hearing on report of city surveyor, Mirpurkhas and submission of case laws. On last dates of hearing the attorney of plaintiff/ D.H, Mr. Jhandal Shah, Advocate was directed to satisfy the Court that how the decree can be executed against a party who was/ has not been joined through its representatives (Genuine Legal Heirs of deceased Ali Muhammad) to which he verbally requested for granting time on the assurance that he will satisfy the court and will produce case laws. Upon his such assurance the matter was adjourned previously. However, the D.H side will be at liberty to advance arguments and to satisfy the court along with case laws in above terms. Learned counsel for D.H seeks time. Put off to-------------------14-7-2026 for Hearing. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 13 | Ist Class Civil Suits 10/2026 |
Captain Humyun Waheed Shaikh VS Province of Sindh & Ors | Abdul Aziz(ADVO-40-SBC-MKS) | Rana Rahil Mehmood(ADVO-457-SBC-MKS) | Matter called repeatedly since morning at different intervals. It is now 01:37 P.M., yet learned counsel for the private defendants has failed to appear and advance final arguments. Mr. Raja Tanveer, Advocate, appeared on behalf of the defendants and informed the Court that learned counsel intends to move adjournment application; however, no such application has been filed despite sufficient time. Perusal of the record reflects that learned counsel for the plaintiff concluded final arguments on 04-05-2026. Since then, the matter has been repeatedly adjourned solely to enable the private defendants to advance their final arguments. Vide detailed order dated 03-07-2026, one very last and final opportunity was granted despite repeated defaults, with a clear direction that final arguments be advanced on the next date, failing which any appropriate order would be passed. Despite the aforesaid indulgence, the defendants have again failed to avail the opportunity. Their conduct clearly demonstrates a lack of interest in advancing final arguments and amounts to misuse of the concession repeatedly extended by this Court. No sufficient cause has been shown for their absence. Virtue of aforesaid position, the right of the private defendants to advance final arguments is hereby closed. Put up to 20-07-2026 for Judgment. However, the defendant side shall remain at liberty to advance final arguments. |
||