SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE / ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE I, MIRPURKHAS : 16-APR-2026

S.NO. CASE NO NAME OF PARTIES ADVOCATES UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS FIR No. Hearing Status
Party Side 1 Party Side 2

CIVIL JURISDICTION

S.NO. CASE NO NAME OF PARTIES ADVOCATES Hearing Status
Party Side 1 Party Side 2
CIVIL JURISDICTION Compliance
1 C.Ex. (Civil Executions) 2/2019
M/S Rab Razi VS Contton Export Corp.& ors   Jawad Ahmed Qureshi(ADVO-3386-SBC-HYD)   Rafiq Ahmed Kalwar(ADVO-9581-SBC-KHS)

16-04-2026. Misc: application in FC Ex: called. Plaintiff/D.H through Ratan Lal is called absent. Learned counsel for plaintiff/D.H Mr. Jawad Ahmed Qureshi is called absent. Attorney of defendant/J.D No.01 namely Asif Raza is called absent. Learned counsel for defendant/J.D Mr. Rafique Ahmed Kalwar is called absent. Objections on statement of Defendant/JD still not filed by plaintiff/D.H. Order passed on separate sheet & announced in open court. As Per Order. Virtue of aforesaid position, both parties & their learned counsel are strictly directed to proceed with the matter till next date failing which any appropriate order shall be passed. Put up to-------14-05-2026 for compliance & filling of objections on statement of defendant/J.D by plaintiff/DH.

CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service
2 Ist Class Civil Suits 342/2012
Muhammad Siddque VS Mst: Shaheena   Mirza Saleem Baig(ADVO-123-SBC-SGR)   Muhammad Shoaib()

16-04-2026. Application U/s 12(2) CPC called. The attorney of applicant is called absent. Learned counsel for attorney of applicant is present. Opponents are called absent. None is appeared on behalf of L.Rs of opponent No.01 & defendant No.02. Notice issued against L.Rs of opponent No. 01 (a & b) returned un-served as per bailiff report of SCJ-Tando Adam that they have been shifted to Karachi. Order on it. As Per Order. Applicant side is directed to provide fresh addresses of L.Rs of opponent No.01. Notice issued against opponent No.02 through SCJ-I Karachi East not returned served or un-served. Notice issued through TCS against opponent No.02 returned un-served. Put up to------30-04-2026 for service against L.Rs of opponent No.01 (a & b) & opponent No.02. Learned counsel for applicant is directed to provide fresh addresses of L.Rs of opponent No.01 as early as possible. Repeat notice opponent No.02 through concerned court on costs.

CIVIL JURISDICTION For Further Proceedings
3 C.Ex. (Civil Executions) 22/2014
ABDUL KHALIQUE AND OTHERS VS SAEED KHAN AND OTHERS   Mujeeb Ur Rehman (ADVO-487-SBC-MKS)  

16-04-2026. F.C Execution application called. Attorney of plaintiff/DH Agedino is called absent. Learned counsel of attorney of plaintiff/DH is called absent. The defendants/JDs are called absent. Learned counsel for L.Rs of defendant/JD No. 01(i to iv) is called absent. The proceedings of this matter already stayed by the Hon'ble ADJ-II Mps & no further orders or direction is received yet. Order passed on separate sheet & announced in open court. As Per Order. None appeared on behalf of either side. I have perused the record. From the perusal of record it transpires that this Court, vide order dated 25-10-2025, stayed the proceedings of the instant execution application in view of an interim order passed by the learned Appellate Court, i.e., learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Mirpurkhas, in Civil Revision No.25 of 2025 (Sharif Muhammad Khan through L.Rs versus Abdul Khalique (deceased) through L.Rs and others) and connected Civil Revision No.26 of 2025 (Miandad Khan versus Abdul Khalique (deceased) through L.Rs and others). The said interim order clearly reflects that the operation of the impugned orders dated 10-03-2025 passed on Civil Misc. Applications No.02/2025 and 03/2025 in F.C. Suit No.319/2012, as well as the judgment and decree dated 24-04-2014, have been suspended/stayed till the next date of hearing by the learned Appellate Court. In consequence thereof, this Court had already stayed further proceedings in the instant execution application, as continuation of execution proceedings, in the presence of such stay order, would be contrary to law and judicial propriety. Today, neither any party has appeared nor any order from the learned Appellate Court has been placed on record showing that the interim relief granted by the learned Appellate Court has been vacated, modified, or recalled. It is a settled principle that subordinate courts are bound to adhere to and act in conformity with the orders passed by the superior courts. So long as the stay order remains in the field, this Court cannot proceed further with the execution application. Virtue of aforesaid position, the instant execution application is hereby adjourned sine die, subject to revival upon receipt of further directions or orders from the learned Appellate Court, i.e., learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Mirpurkhas.

4 C.Ex. (Civil Executions) 3/2024
Muhammad Imran & Ors VS Muhammad Aslam   Zulfiqar Ali (ADVO-981-SBC-MKS)   Zahid Khalil(ADVO-538-SBC-MKS)

15-04-2026. Matter called. The plaintiffs/DHs are called absent except plaintiff/DH No.01 & 02 who are present. Learned counsel for plaintiffs/DHs No.01 & 02 is present. The defendant/JD is present. Learned counsel for defendant/JD is called absent. The proceedings of execution application already suspended by this court till the final decision of application U/s 12(2) CPC. Put up to--------23-04-2026 for further proceedings.

CIVIL JURISDICTION For Issues
5 Ist Class Civil Suits 80/2022
Mst Zarina & ors VS Muhammad Azeem & ors   Rafique Ahmed(ADVO-153-SBC-JMS)   Zulfiqar Ali(ADVO-541-SBC-MKS)

16-04-2026. Matter called. Plaintiffs are called absent. Learned counsel for plaintiff Mr. Rafique Ahmed Laghari is present. Defendants are called absent. Learned counsel for L.Rs of defendant No.01 Mr. Zulfiqar Ali Laghari is called absent. Learned DDA for official defendants is present. Proposed draft issues filed by learned counsel for plaintiffs already on record. Proposed draft issues still not filed by defendant No.01. Order passed on separate sheet & announced in open court. Asper Order. Instant matter has recently been remanded by Honourable High Court of Sindh with direction to proceed with the matter by trying only to the extent of defendant No.01 and passed Judgment on merit. In compliance the matter was fixed for issues/ draft issues from both sides. In this regard, learned counsel for the plaintiff has already filed draft issues while learned counsel for the defendant No.01 has not submitted draft issues despite of the fact that he appeared and assured that he will file draft issues. Though the matter has been repeatedly adjourned/ fixed since 10-04-2026 till today but despite of that learned counsel for defendant No.01 has not bothered to file draft issues. The perusal reveals that there are certain legal points for which hearing of both sides is necessary. As such, let the matter be fixed for hearing of both sides in above terms as well as for filing draft issues from defendant No.01 side. Matter adjourned to ---------17-04-2026 for hearing in above terms as well as draft issues from defendant No.01 side with direction to defendant No:01 side to appear and proceed with the matter till next date failing which any appropriate order shall be passed.

CIVIL JURISDICTION For Evidence
6 Ist Class Civil Suits 277/2015
MUHAMMAD ISMAIL KHAN VS MST. JAMEELA AND OTHERS   Faisal(ADVO-501-SBC-MKS)   Ahmed Nawaz Khan(ADVO-715-SBC-MKS) سماعت جاری ہے

16-04-2026. Matter called. Attorney of plaintiffs & her learned counsel Mr. Rao Faisal Ali is present. Plaintiffs witness Khuda Bux is also present. Defendants are called absent except attorney of defendant No.02 who is present in morning time. Learned counsel for defendant No.1(i) Mr. Rana Raheel Mehmood is called absent. Learned counsel for defendant No.02 Mr. Ahmed Nawaz Khan is present. Learned DDA for official defendants is present. Cross examination of attorney Samreen of plaintiffs is recorded at Ex:74. Cross examination of plaintiffs witness Khuda Bux is recorded at Ex:54. Further cross examination of attorney of plaintiff & plaintiffs witness kept reserved on request of learned counsel for defendant No.02 while their cross examination for learned counsel for defendant No.01 kept reserved on his absence. Put up to--------23-04-2026 for further cross examination of attorney of plaintiffs & her witness by defendant No.01 & their cross examination by defendant No.01. Learned counsel for defendant No.01 is directed to proceed with the matter till next date.

7 Ist Class Civil Suits 159/2017
Muhammad Ashraf VS Aamir Hameed and others   Ahmed Nawaz Khan(ADVO-715-SBC-MKS)   Tahseen Ahmed(ADVO-339-SBC-MKS) سماعت جاری ہے

16-04-3026. F.C suit called. Plaintiff is present. Learned counsel for plaintiff Mr. Ahmad Nawaz Khan is present. Plaintiff produced his witness Abdul Aziz. Defendants are called absent. Learned counsel for defendants Mr. Tehseen Ahmed Qureshi is called absent. Examination in chief of plaintiff witness Abdul Aziz Shoro is recorded at Ex:90 & his cross examination declared nil on repeatedly called on defendant side though chance given. Application U/o 151 CPC for issuance of summons to plaintiff witness Jamshed at Ex:91. Order on it. File/ Office to issue summons to the witness Jamshed. Order passed on separate sheet & announced in open court. As Per Order. Learned counsel for the plaintiff is present. The plaintiff is also present. The witness namely Abdul Aziz S/o Abdul Kareem is present. None appeared from defendant side though matter called repeatedly and posted several times during course of the day for want of appearance of defendant side. The examination in chief of the witness Abdul Aziz thereafter recorded while his cross-examination was declared Nil due to absence of defendant side. It is pertinent to mention here that no any intimation or adjournment been moved from defendant side either to post/ keep aside the matter during course of the day or to adjourned it to some future date as such the cross-examination of the said witness was declared Nil though chance extended to defendant side but none appeared from their side. Learned counsel for the plaintiff disclosed that examination in chief of witness Jamshaid was already recorded but now the said witness is reluctant to appear in the court as such he requested through statement that summon be issued to the said witness. Apart from that there is direction from Honourable Appellate Court passed in first Civil appeal No.03/2022 by Court of Honourable District Judge, Mirpurkhas to provide opportunity to defendant side for cross-examination to the plaintiff witnesses. Needless to say here that cross-examination of said witness was declared Nil at the time of recording his chief due to absence of defendant side however, keeping in view the directions of Honourable Appellate court and principle of natural justice and fair trial, let summon be issued to the said witness. Matter adjourned to 22-04-2026 for cross-examination of witness namely Jamshaid S/o Rasheed Ahmed. Both sides are directed to appear and proceed with the matter till next date failing which any appropriate order shall be passed against defaulting party. Office is directed to issue summons to plaintiff witness Jamshed son of Rasheed Ahmed on costs. Late Dairy at about 12:27 pm. The defendant No.01 appeared & marks his attendance stated that he need long date of hearing. Matter already fixed on 22-04-2026.

8 Ist Class Civil Suits 7/2018
Jawaid Ali VS Muhammad Ibrahim and others.   Mir Ali()   Pervez Akhtar(ADVO-480-SBC-MKS)

16-04-3026. F.C suit called. The plaintiff & his learned counsel are called absent. The defendants are called absent. Learned counsel for defendant No.01 Mr. Mir Pervaiz Akhtar is called absent his junior is present & filed application U/o 148 CPC for adjournment at Ex:62 on the ground that his senior counsel has not prepared to proceed with the matter. Order on it. As Per Order. Heard perused. Virtue reason given in instant application, matter adjourned to 22-04-2026 for cross examination of plaintiff with direction to both side to proceed with the matter by next date. Put up to-------22-04-2026 for cross-examination of plaintiff by defendant side & further evidence of plaintiff side. Learned counsel for both parties are directed to proceed with the matter till next date of hearing without fail.

9 Ist Class Civil Suits 17/2026
Mst. Ruqayya Begum through her L.Rs VS Mst. Shahina Begum & Others   Ghulam Murtaza(ADVO-39-SBC-TAY)   Mirza Fawad Saleem(ADVO-298-SBC-SGR)

16-04-2026. Matter called. Attorney of plaintiff is called absent. Learned counsel for plaintiff Mr. Amir Ahmed Junejo is present. Defendants are called absent. Learned counsel for defendant No.01 is called absent. The defendant No.02 already debarred. Application U/o 148 CPC for adjournment filed by plaintiff counsel at Ex:87 on the ground that daughter of attorney of plaintiff is admitted in hospital at Hyderabad. Order on it. As Per Order. Heard perused. Matter is adjourned in the interest of justice. Put up to--------23-04-2026 for evidence of plaintiff side.