| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Misc. Applications | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.M.A. (Criminal Misc. Applications) 1/2025 | Muhammad Imran VS The State | Kamran Bhatti(ADVO-630-SBC-MKS) | Cr.PC-517 | / |
13-12-2005. Crl. Misc. Application U/s 517 Cr.P.C called. The applicant Muhammad Imran is called absent. Learned counsel for applicant is present. Learned ADPP for state is present. Verification report of license submitted by Deputy Commissioner/ Collector Mps already on record. Verification report of armed license of application not received from Home Department Karachi. Put up to----22-12-2025 for hearing on application U/s 517 Cr.P.C & receiving of verification report of license of applicant from Home Department Government of Sindh at Karachi. Call concerned official of license branch of D.C office Mirpurkhas alongwith relevant record. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION Compliance | |||||||
| 1 | C.Ex. (Civil Executions) 3/2024 |
Muhammad Imran & Ors VS Muhammad Aslam | Zulfiqar Ali (ADVO-981-SBC-MKS) | Zahid Khalil(ADVO-538-SBC-MKS) | 13-12-2025. Matter called. The plaintiff/DH No.01 & 02 are present, their learned counsel are called absent. The defendant/J.D is called absent. Learned counsel for defendant/JD is also called absent. Notice issued against plaintiffs/DH & defendant/JD returned served against plaintiff/DH No.01 who also received notice on behalf of plaintiff/DH NO.02 to 04 & defendant/JD as per bailiff report. Order on it. Put up to-----17-12-2025 for compliance. Issue notice to defendant/JD by way of pasting with direction to appear & proceed with the matter without fail. |
||
| 2 | C.Ex. (Civil Executions) 2/2025 |
Muhammad Iqbal VS Muhammad Shakir | Muhammad Asif(ADVO-372-SBC-MKS) | Muhammad Noordin(ADVO-670-SBC-MKS) | Through instant application, the decree holder side has prayed for issuance of warrant of arrest of J.D on account of non-compliance of Judgment and decree by J.D. Perusal reveals that vide Judgment dated: 28-02-2023 and decree dated:06-03-2023, the suit of the plaintiff was decreed to the extent of prayer clause-I with sale profit at the bank rate and J.D was directed to return the amount of Rs.1,550,000/- (fifteen lacs and fifty thousand) forth with without fail to the plaintiff and in case of failure the Nazir of this court was directed to attach the property of the defendant/ J.D to recover the due amount and in case having no property of J.D, the defendant J.D shall be put in prison till payment of said amount. Per record, the decree holder filed civil execution No:02 of 2025 which has also been allowed vide order dated: 06-08-2025 with clear directions to J.D to make compliance. Despite of that, he has failed to make its compliance. Thereafter the decree holder side filed instant application under order 21 rule 37 read with section 151 C.P.C and upon notice, the J.D side filed counter affidavit on it. Show cause notice was ordered to be issued against J.D vide order dated:28-10-2025 and such notice was also received by the J.D but despite of that the J.D has failed to make compliance without any reason. Today, the counsel for J.D and J.D himself called absent. An adjournment application in this regard was sent by learned counsel for J.D through his office clerk, has been dismissed being meritless. The J.D side has failed to make compliance of aforesaid Judgment and decree and so also in todays said adjournment application, not a single word mentioned therein that J.D is ready and willing for compliance of Judgment and decree, hence, it appears that J.D is not ready that he will make compliance of Judgment and decree in near future. In view of aforesaid position, let warrant of arrest be issued against J.D namely Muhammad Shakir. Office is directed to issue warrant of arrest, accordingly. Application under order 21 rule 37 disposed off in above terms. Put up to-----20-12-2025 for compliance. The office is directed to issue warrant of arrest against defendant/JD namely Muhammad Shakir & sent to the SHO of concerned police station for its execution. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 3 | C.Ex. (Civil Executions) 8/2018 |
Lakhano and ors VS Gul Fakir and ors | Zahid Hussain Laghari() | 13-12-2025. Civil execution application called. Today the execution application is fixed for compliance. None is present from either side. From the perusal of record it reveals that the instant execution application were fixed on 11-09-2025, 23-09-2025, 12-11-2025 and 13-12-2025 but none is present from either side. Execution application called repeatedly since morning but neither the plaintiffs/D.Hs called absent. Learned counsel for the plaintiffs/D.Hs called absent. No intimation or adjournment has been moved from the plaintiffs/D.Hs side either to fix the matter during course of the day or to adjourn it. It is 11:00 A.M but none appeared from the plaintiffs/D.Hs side. As such it appears that plaintiffs/D.Hs side has lost interest to pursue further with his own lis. Virtue of aforesaid position, the civil execution application of the plaintiffs/D.Hs is hereby dismissed in non-prosecution with no order as to costs. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 4 | Ist Class Civil Suits 297/2012 |
Abdul Ghaffar VS Abdul Razzak | Javed Ahmed Qazi(ADVO-13711-SBC-KHS) | Rana Rahil Mehmood(ADVO-457-SBC-MKS) | 13-12-2025. Matter called. This suit is main leading suit consolidated with F.C Suit No.305/2012. The plaintiff is present. Learned counsel for plaintiff is present. The defendant No:01 is called absent. Learned counsel for defendant is present. Application U/o 148 CPC for adjournment filed by learned counsel for defendant stating therein that defendant Abdul Razzak is busy in marriage ceremony of their children's & Valima schedule on 14-12-2025 at Ex:171. Order on it. File. Order passed on separate sheet & announced in open court. As Per Order. The matter once again adjourned in the larger interest of justice with direction to defendant Abdul Razzak to produce witnesses & deposit costs amount of Rs:10,000/- till next date failing which any appropriate order shall be passed. Instant application is disposed off in above terms. Put off to-------17-12-2025 for evidence of defendant side as last & final chance. |
||
| 5 | Ist Class Civil Suits 305/2012 |
Mst: Khatoon VS Abdul Ghaffar | Rana Rahil Mehmood(ADVO-457-SBC-MKS) | Abdul Rauf Arain(ADVO-252-SBC-MKS),Javed Ahmed Qazi(ADVO-13711-SBC-KHS) | 13-12-2025. Matter called. This suit is consolidated with main leading F.C Suit No.297/2012. The attendance of parties & their learned counsel recorded in main leading suit. Leading suit is adjourned, hence this suit is also adjourned. Put off to----17-12-2025 for evidence of defendant side as last & final chance. |
||
| 6 | Commercial- Suit 2/2023 |
Muzamil Noor & Another VS Mst Ruqayya Nighat Usman & Others | Attaullah Shaikh (ADVO-1079-SBC-MKS) | Ahmed Nawaz Khan(ADVO-715-SBC-MKS),Qadeer Chohan() | 13-12-2025. Matter called. The attorney of plaintiffs is present. Plaintiff produced his private witnesses namely Muhammad Imran & Mirza Saad Baig. Learned counsel for plaintiff is present. The defendants are called absent. Learned counsel for defendant No:02 is present. The defendant No:01 already proceeded ex-parte. Affidavit in evidence of attorney of plaintiff & plaintiff witnesses Muhammad Imran & Mirza Saad Baig filed by learned counsel for plaintiff at Ex:34 to 36 respectively & their examination in chief are recorded, their cross examination kept reserved on verbal request of learned counsel for defendant No.02. Put up to--------17-12-2025 for cross examination of attorney of plaintiff & plaintiff witnesses by the learned counsel for defendant No.02. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Hearing of Applications | |||||||
| 7 | Ist Class Civil Suits 21/2023 |
Muhammad Aslam VS Muhammad Imran & Others | Peer Jhandal Shah(ADVO-1029-SBC-MKS) | DDA(DDA-003-GOV-MPK),Zulfiqar Ali (ADVO-981-SBC-MKS) | 13-12-2025. Matter called. The applicant is called absent. Learned counsel for applicant is called absent. The opponents are called absent except opponent No.02 & 03 who are present. Learned counsel for opponents is called absent. Learned DDA for official opponent is present. Order passed on separate sheet & announced in open court. As Per Order. The record shows that the applicant Nadeem s/o Shamsuddin filed application U/o 12(2) CPC & application U/s 151 CPC. The said applications are fixed for hearing since last number of dates. Today matter called repeatedly but neither the applicant side nor the plaintiff/DH side appeared, however in the interest of justice matter adjourned to ----17-12-2025 for hearing. Let both application U/o 12(2) CPC & 151 CPC filed by the applicant side be fixed for order with liberty to both sides for meanwhile arguments. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Final Arguments | |||||||
| 8 | Ist Class Civil Suits 37/2018 |
Hassan Bux & ors VS Photo Khan & ors | Muhammad Asif(ADVO-372-SBC-MKS) | DDA(DDA-003-GOV-MPK),Ghulam Nabi (ADVO-512-SBC-MKS) | 13-12-2025. F.C suit called. Attorney of plaintiff is called absent. Learned counsel for plaintiff is present. L.Rs of defendant No.02 (a) /attorney Qurban Ali is present. Learned counsel for the L.Rs of defendant No.02 is called absent. Learned DDA for official defendants is present. Written arguments filed by the learned counsel for both parties. Put off to--------19-12-2025 for further final arguments. |
||