| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Hearing | |||||||
| 1 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 107/2022 | The State VS Salman Baloch | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-UK) | Mian Bux Khoso() | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 75/2022 Kunri |
Case called. Accused Salman is produced through video link from CP/CF Mirpurkhas. Learned ADPP for State and Mr. Sharif Bheel (Pauper) Advocate on behalf of accused Salman are present. Partly arguments heard of Defence Counsel. Case put off to- 15-04-2026 for further hearing of Defence Counsel for accused Salman. Jail authorities is directed to produce accused on date of hearing through Video link. |
| 2 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 108/2022 | The State VS Zafar Baloch | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-UK) | Arshad Hussain(ADVO-288-SBC-MKS) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 76/2022 Kunri |
Case called. Accused Zafar is present on bail. Learned ADPP for State is present. Defence Counsel for accused Zafar is called absent. Arguments heard. Main case is adjourned, therefore, this case is also adjourned and put off to- 15-04-2026 for hearing. Accused is directed to attend. |
| 3 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 186/2022 | The State VS Muhammad Jameel Noohani | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-UK) | Suheino Oad(ADVO-504-SBC-MKS) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 133/2022 Kunri |
Case called. Accused Muhammad Jameel is present on bail. ADPP for State and Defence Counsel are present. Further arguments heard of parties' counsels, and Judgment announced in open Court. Accused is acquitted U/S 265-H-(i) Cr.P.C. Accused Muhammad Jameel is present on bail and his bail bond stands cancelled and surety discharged. |
| 4 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 226/2022 | The State VS Muhammad Zeeshan | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-UK) | Abdul Ghaffar(ADVO-375-SBC-MKS) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 185/2022 Kunri |
Case called. Accused Muhammad Zeeshan is produced through video link from Central Prison Mirpurkhas. ADPP for State and Defence Counsel for accused Zeeshan are present. Further arguments heard of both sides. Judgement passed and announced in open court. Accused Zeeshan by using pistol in commission of offence in connected case, has committed offence punishable U/S 25 of Sindh Arms Act 2013, therefore he is convicted u/s 265-H(ii) Cr.P.C and sentenced to suffer R.I for seven years and to pay fine of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand), in case of default in payment of fine he has to suffer six months more simple imprisonment. Benefit of section 382-B Cr.P.C is extended to the accused. Accused is produced through video link, as he is confined in Central Prison Mirpurkhas and conviction warrants are to be sent to jail authorities for accused to serve out the sentence according to law and rules. Copy of this judgment along with receipt is also to be sent alongwith conviction warrants to be handed over/supplied to accused free of cost by Jail Authority and receipt be obtained thereof be sent back to this Court. |
| 5 | SC (Murder Trial) 20/2023 | The State VS Salman & Others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-UK),Roshan Ali(ADVO-1145-SBC-MKS) | Arshad Hussain(ADVO-288-SBC-MKS),Mian Bux Khoso() | PPC-114,PPC-302,PPC-337-A(i),PPC-34 | 71/2022 Kunri |
Case called. Accused Salman is produced through video link from CP/CF Mirpurkhas. While accused Zafar is present on bail. The proceedings against accused Murad Bux has already been abated. Learned ADPP for State is present. Counsel for Complainant and Defence Counsel for accused Zafar are called absent. Mr. Sharif Bheel (Pauper) Advocate on behalf of accused Salman is present. Partly arguments heard of advocate for accused Salman. Case put off to- 15-04-2026 for further hearing of Defence Counsel for accused Salman. Jail authorities is directed to produce accused on date of hearing through Video link. Accused Zafar is directed to attend. |
| 6 | SC (Murder Trial) 2/2023 | The State VS Muhammad Asif & Others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-UK),Muhammad Aslam Nafees(ADVO-68-SBC-UMR) | Abdul Ghaffar(ADVO-375-SBC-MKS),Ghulam Ishaque(ADVO-1230-SBC-MKS),Sajad Hussain (ADVO-154-SBC-TAY),Suheino Oad(ADVO-504-SBC-MKS) | PPC-109,PPC-302,PPC-34 | 127/2022 Kunri |
Case called. Accused Muhammad Asif, Mst. Shahida Parveen and Muhammad Jameel are present on bail. Accused Muhammad Zeeshan is produced through video link from Central Prison Mirpurkhas. Accused Ali Raza Rajput had already been declared as proclaimed offender. ADPP for State, Counsel for Complainant, Defence Counsels for accused Zeeshan, Muhammad Jameel, Muhammad Asif, and Mst. Shahida Parveen are present. Complainant Rashid is present. Further arguments heard of Counsel for Complainant. Judgement passed and announced in open court. the prosecution has successfully established the charge against present accused Muhammad Zeeshan beyond any shadow of doubt for committing qatl-i-amd of deceased Umair Ahmed and failed to establish charge against accused persons namely Muhammad Asif, Muhammad Jameel and Mst. Shahida. Since the prosecution has failed to prove the motive which is one of mitigating circumstances, therefore, this court while taking lenient view convict accused Muhammad Zeeshan S/O Muhammad Hussain Arain U/S 265-H (ii) Cr.P.C and sentenced to suffer life imprisonment for the offence of qatl-i-amd U/S 302(b) PPC as Ta???zir and to pay Rs. 500,000/- (Rupees five lac only) as compensation to the legal heirs of deceased U/S 544-A Cr.P.C which is to be recovered from accused as arrears of land Revenue. In case of default, he shall suffer six months more rigors imprisonment. The benefit of section 382-B Cr.P.C is extended to accused. The accused Muhammad Zeeshan is produced through video link, as he is confined in Central Prison Mirpurkhas and conviction warrant is to be sent to jail authorities for accused Muhammad Zeeshan to serve out his sentence awarded to him according to law. The accused persons namely Muhammad Asif S/O Muhammad Rafique Arain, Muhammad Jameel S/O Arzi Noohani and Mst. Shahida Parveen W/O Muhammad Hussain Arain are acquitted U/S 265-H (i) Cr.P.C by extending benefit of doubt. The case against proclaimed offender Ali Raza has already been kept on dormant file; his file will be re-opened as and when produced or appear. |
| 7 | DC (Direct Complaint) 1/2026 | Gul Muhammad Samejo VS Abdul Hakeem & Ors | Bashir Ahmed Samejo(Suspend) | PPC-397,PPC-427 | / |
P.E/D.C Called. Complainant and his Counsel are present. For want of time. Put off to 09-04-2026 for statement of complainant U/S 200 CR.P.C. Complainant is directed to attend. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 8 | PPC 253/2023 | The State VS Anwar @ Baghar & others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-UK) | Mian Bux Khoso(),Suheino Oad(ADVO-504-SBC-MKS) | PPC-324,PPC-353,PPC-504 | 18/2022 Kunri |
Case called. Accused Lal Bux @ Laloo is present on bail. Accused Anwer @ Baghar, Mst. Kariman, Mst. Hajran and Mst. Sakina are called absent. While case of accused Mst. Eid Bai has already been bifurcated vide order dated. 23.12.2025 as declared as proclaimed offender. While accused, Ashraf @ Ashro and Khair Bai @ Kharo have already been declared as proclaimed offenders. ADPP for state is present. Defence Counsel for accused Anwar @ Baghar and Lal Bux is present. Defence Counsel for accused Mst. Kariman, Mst. Hajran, and Mst. Sakina is called absent. Process BW against accused persons returned un-served. Advocate for accused filed application for excuse the absence of all accused as Kunri police large the FIR Crime No.58/2026 against the accused persons. Order on it. Absence of accused persons is excused. Process not returned. PWs PCs Ali Pasand and Ghulam Qadir are called absent and No PW is present. Surety Darhon of accused Eid Bai is called absent. Notice against surety returned un-served. Case put off to 22-04-2026 for evidence. Present accused Lal Bux is directed to attend. Issue BW against Complainant and PWs. Repeat notice to surety Darhoon of accused Mst. Eid Bai. |
| 9 | SC (Murder Trial) 242/2023 | The State VS Raman Oad & Others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-UK),Suheino Oad(ADVO-504-SBC-MKS) | Ayaz Ali(ADVO-45-SBC-UMR),Mian Bux Khoso() | PPC-114,PPC-302,PPC-365B,PPC-504 | 22/2023 Umerkot City |
Case Called. Accused Hero Oad is present on bail. Accused Raman, Ghaman Oad, Moti and Dileep are produced through video link from Central Prison Mirpurkhas. While Accused, Sikander @ Sikoo and Rajoo have already been declared as proclaimed offenders. ADPP for the State, Counsel for Complainant and Defence Counsel are present. Defence Counsel for accused Hero is called absent. Process returned. Complainant Haresh and his PWs Mukesh and Sht. Amarta are present and directed to appear on the next date of hearing. Due to absence of Defence Counsel for accused Hero. Case is adjourned and put off to 22-04-2026 for evidence. Accused Hero is directed to attend. Prison Authorities are directed to produce the remaining accused persons on next date of hearing through video link. Repeat summons to remaining private PWs. Issue NBW against proclaimed offender accused, Sikander @ Sikoo and Rajoo. |
| 10 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 130/2025 | The State VS Ali Raza @ Shan | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-UK) | IN PERSON (SELF)(ADVO-001-SBC-MKS) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 21/2025 Samaro |
Case called. Accused Ali Raza @ Shan is present on bail. ADPP for state and Defence Counsel for accused are present. Process returned. No PW is present. Case put off to 15-04-2026 for evidence. Accused is directed to attend. Issue summons against Complainant and PWs. |
| 11 | SC (Murder Trial) 129/2025 | The State VS Ali Raza @ Shan & Ors | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-UK) | IN PERSON (SELF)(ADVO-001-SBC-MKS) | PPC-114,PPC-120-B,PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-201.,PPC-302,PPC-311 | 16/2025 Samaro |
Case called. Accused Ali Raza @ Shan, Ali Nawaz, Tarique, Zulifqar Ali, Yousif @ Jopo, Jamshed @ Jhamoro and Nadeem are present on bail. Accused Dilshad is called absent. While accused Ali Hyder, Aijaz, Hamid Ali, Khalil Ahmed and Shahbaz have already been declared as proclaimed offenders. ADPP for state and Defence Counsel for accused persons are present. Co-accused Ali Raza moved application for excuse the absence of accused Dilshad on the ground of illness. Order on it. Absence of accused is excused. Supplementary Challan against proclamied offender accused persons Ali Hyder, Aijaz, Hamid Ali, Khalil Ahmed and Shahbaz received from Hon'ble Sessions Court Umerkot. Order on it. Accused Ali Hyder, Aijaz, Hamid Ali, Khalil Ahmed and Shahbaz are produced in custody from Sub-Jail Umerkot. Copies of case papers supplied to accused persons and obtained such receipt at Exh.18. Process returned served and un-served. No PW is present. Case put off to 15-04-2026 for amended charge. present accused are directed to attend. Accused Ali Hyder, Aijaz, Hamid Ali, Khalil Ahmed and Shahbaz are remanded back to jail custody with direction to produce them on the next date of hearing. |
| 12 | PPC 134/2025 | The State VS Sikandar Rajar & Ors | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-UK),Shareef() | Saddam Hussain (ADVO-1240-SBC-MKS) | PPC-324,PPC-337-Fi,PPC-34,PPC-504 | 179/2025 Umerkot City |
Case Called. All accused are present on bail. ADPP for the State and Counsel for Complainant are present. Defence Counsel is called absent. Process returned un-served. No PW is present. Case put off to 23-04-2026 for evidence. All accused are directed to attend. Issue BW against Complainant and remaining private PWs. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 13 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 329/2026 | Ramchand VS SHO PS Umerkot City & Ors | Rasheed Ahmed (ADVO-2251-SBC-LRK) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Crl. Misc. Application called. Applicant is present, and his Counsel is called absent. Proposed accused Moro and his Counsel are present. Provisional Medical Certificate of applicant received from SHO PS Umerkot City. Mr. Aidan advocate filed Vakalatnama on behalf of applicant. Order on it. File. Put off to 10.04.2026 for arguments. Parties are directed to attend. |
|
| 14 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 344/2026 | Salikhan VS SHO PS Umerkot City & Ors | IN PERSON (SELF)(ADVO-001-SBC-MKS) | Cr.PC-22-A,Cr.PC-22-B | / |
Crl. Misc. Application called. Applicant is present. Mr. Sharif Bheel advocate filed Vakalatnama on behalf of applicant. Order on it. File. I/C District Complaint Cell Umerkot is present and submitted report. Order on it. Notice upon proposed accused returned through cell number. Proposed accused No.5 and 6 are present. Mr. Heera Lal Oad advocate filed Vakalatnama on behalf of proposed accused Mirchand and Kamlesh. Order on it. File. Arguments heard of both sides. Order passed and announced in open court. In terms of order Crl. Misc. Application is allowed. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 15 | PPC 13/2026 | The State VS Suranzaib and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-UK) | PPC-364-A,PPC-365B | 39/2025 Women & Children (Umerkot) |
Case Called. All accused persons are absconders. Learned ADPP for the State is present. Process NBW against absconder accused person not returned. Case put off to 22-04-2026 for service. Issue NBW against absconder accused persons through concerned SHO, in case of non-execution of warrant SHO will appear in person. |
|
| 16 | PPC 20/2025 | The State VS Aashique Ali and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-UK) | Anti-Rape (Investigation and Trial Act, 2021)-U/S Act: Anti-Rape,PPC-354-A,PPC-364-A,PPC-365B | 67/2025 Women & Children (Umerkot) |
Case Called. All accused persons are absconders. Learned ADPP for the State is present. Process NBW issued against absconder accused persons returned un-executed. Case put off to 22-04-2026 for service. Repeat NBW against absconder accused persons through concerned SHO, in case of non-execution of warrant SHO will appear in person. |
|
| 17 | PPC 36/2026 | The State VS AamirJakhro | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-UK) | PPC-365B | 236/2025 Umerkot City |
Case Called. Accused person is absconders. Learned ADPP for the State is present. Process NBW against absconder accused person returned un-executed. Case put off to 20-04-2026 for service. Repeat NBW against absconder accused person through concerned SHO, in case of non-execution of warrant SHO will appear in person. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 17/2026 |
Ali Bahadur VS Muhammad Ameen and others | Parshotam K. Khatri() | C.A. Called. Appellant and his advocate are called absent. Respondent No.1 Muhammad Amin and his advocate are present. Official respondents No.4 to 7 are called absent. Mr. Jagat DDA filed memo of appearance on behalf of official respondents No.4 to 8. Order on it. Notice upon respondents No.2 and 3 not issued by office. In the interest of justice. Put off to 15.04.2026 for service and objection on application U/O 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC. Issue notice upon respondents No.2 and 3 through bailiff on cost. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 2 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 10/2024 |
Mir Ali Mustafa Khan Talpur through attorney Mir Ali Hyder VS Gangoo Kolhi & Others | Aayatullah(ADVO-2190-SBC-HYD),Abdul Rahim Chandio(ADVO-398-SBC-LRK) | DDA(DDA-002-GOV-MPK),Muhammad Ibrahim(ADVO-92-SBC-UMR) | |||