ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE II, MIRPURKHAS : 19-SEP-2025

S.NO. CASE NO NAME OF PARTIES ADVOCATES UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS FIR No. Hearing Status
Party Side 1 Party Side 2

CRIMINAL JURISDICTION

S.NO. CASE NO NAME OF PARTIES ADVOCATES UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS FIR No. Hearing Status
Party Side 1 Party Side 2
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C)
1 Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 862/2025 Sodho VS The State       Cr.PC-498 99/2025
Digri

Bail application called. Accused Sodho and Mubarak are present on interim bail. Counsel for accused is present. Learned ADPP is present. Complainant is present in person. Mr. Heman advocate for complainant is present. Learned ADPP stated that Investigation is in pipe line as yet. Learned counsel stated at bar with a request for adjournment by moving such application in writing but he failed to do so. In the great interest of justice, adjourned. Put off to 27-09-2025 for arguments. Learned ADPP is required to arrange all material related to this matter.

CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 491
2 Habeas Corpus 281/2025 Ashok Kumar VS SHO PS Digri & Ors       Cr.PC-491 /

Criminal Misc application called. Applicant is present in person. Counsel for applicant is present. Learned ADPP is present. The SHO PS Digri has sent his report alongwith alleged detainees. Respondents are absent. Counsel for applicant filed statement that the grievance of applicant has been resolved, hence the instant application be disposed of. Order passed on separate sheet and announced in open court. As per order, the instant application is disposed of in terms of order.

CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A
3 Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1628/2025 Menomal VS SHO PS KGM & Ors       Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) /

Criminal Misc application called. Applicant is present in person. Counsel for applicant is present. Learned ADPP is present. The SHO PS KGMi has sent his report. Respondents are present in person. Mr. Sardar Hassan Leghari filed power on behalf of respondents. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced in open court. As per order, the instant application is disposed of in terms of order.

4 Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1629/2025 Shr. Lachhmi & another VS SHO PS Satellite Town & Ors   Nazeeran Soomro (ADVO-520-SBC-MKS)     Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) /

Criminal Misc application called. Applicants and their counsel are absent despite of repeated calls from time to time. Learned ADPP is present. The SHO PS Satellite town has sent his report. Respondents are absent. Order passed on separate sheet and announced in open court. As per order, the instant application is disposed of in terms of order.

5 Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1630/2025 Muhammad Arif VS SHO PS Tando Jan Muhammad & Ors       Cr.PC-22-A,Cr.PC-22-B /

Criminal Misc application called. Applicant is present in person. Counsel for applicant is present. Learned ADPP is present. The SHO PS TJM has sent his report. Respondents Shabuddin is present in person. Mr. Vishandas advocate filed power on behalf of respondent. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced in open court. As per order, the instant application is disposed of in terms of order.

6 Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1643/2025 Mst. Muqadas & another VS SHO PS Satellite Town & Ors       Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) /

The R & Ps received from the court of Honourable, District and Sessions Judge, Mirpurkhas by way of transfer. Criminal Misc application called. Applicants are present in person. Counsel for applicants is present. Learned ADPP is present. The SHO PS Satellite town has sent his report. Respondents are absent. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced in open court. As per order, the instant application is disposed of in terms of order.

7 Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1644/2025 Shr. Lachhmi & another VS SHO PS Satellite Town & Ors       Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) /

R & P s received from the court of Honourable, District and Sessions Judge, Mirpurkhas by way of transfer. Criminal Misc application called. Applicants are absent. Counsel for applicant is present. Learned ADPP is present. The SHO PS Satellite town has sent his report. Respondents Daya Ram, Hemo Amro are present in person. Mr. Satram Sonani advocate filed power on behalf of respondents. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced in open court. As per order, the instant application is disposed of in terms of order.

CIVIL JURISDICTION

S.NO. CASE NO NAME OF PARTIES ADVOCATES Hearing Status
Party Side 1 Party Side 2
CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service
1 C.Rev. (Civil Revisions) 31/2023
Arshad VS Muhammad Arshad and Others   Faisal(ADVO-501-SBC-MKS)   Ghulam Zaheer(ADVO-1025-SBC-MKS),Nasir Ahmed Khan(ADVO-313-SBC-MKS)

Matter called. Applicant Arshad is absent. Counsel for applicant is absent, his clerk is present. Respondents called absent. Respondent No.1 is absent. His counsel is present. Learned ADPP for official respondents No.5 to 7 is present. Perused the diaries reveals that the matter continuously is being adjourned for same purpose since long but no any progress has been made. Both the parties and their counsels are required to comply the diary with last warning. In case of failure on the part of either party, appropriate order will be passed accordingly. Respondents No.2 and 4 have already been debarred from filing objections vide order dated 17-07-2025. In the great interest of justice with warning, adjourned. Put off to 10-09-2025 for service. Applicant is required to supply fresh address of respondent No.3(as per endorsement of bailiff that respondent is residing Taluka Khipro).

2 C.A. (Civil Appeals) 28/2025
Muhammad Yaseen VS Bux Ali & Others   Faisal(ADVO-501-SBC-MKS)  

Matter called. The appellant is absent. Counsel for appellant is absent. Process against remaining respondents No.1 to 14 and respondent No.19 not issued by concerned clerk. In the interest of justice, adjourned. Put off to --------- 10-10-2025 for service. Issue process against respondents No.1 to 14 and respondent No.19 on cost through court as well as through TCS with directions that the delivery report of TCS be submitted to this court.

3 Summary Suits 32/2025
Shoukat Ali VS Maaz Ali    

Matter called. Plaintiff is present in person. Process against defendant returned un-served. Counsel for plaintiff is present. Defendant voluntarily appeared. Mr. Bilawal Chana advocate appeared and filed power on behalf of defendant alongwith application u/o 23 rule 2 CPC alongwith affidavits of plaintiff and defendant at Ex....5 to Ex...8. Order passed on separate sheet and announced in open court. As per order, the compromise application accepted in terms of order. Let the compromise decree be prepared.

CIVIL JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A.
4 C.A. (Civil Appeals) 115/2024
Muhammad Yasir Khan VS Khalid Jawaid & Others   Qurban Ali Baat(ADVO-3069-SBC-HYD)  

Matter called. The appellant is absent. Counsel for appellant is present. The respondents No. 1,5,8 and all L.Rs of respondents No.2,3,4 are absent and failed to file objections objections despite of specific directions. Service upon all respondents is held good. Order passed on order sheet and announced in open court. As per order, The respondents No.1,5,8 and L.Rs of respondents No.2,3 and 4 are debarred from filing objections and instant appeal is fixed for arguments. Put off to ---------03-10-2025 for arguments. Call R & Ps from trial court.

FAMILY JURISDICTION

S.NO. CASE NO NAME OF PARTIES ADVOCATES UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS Hearing Status
Party Side 1 Party Side 2
FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service
1 F.A. (Family Appeals) 28/2023 Khalid Ashfaque VS Mst. Fiza   Jawaid Choudhari(ADVO-8-SBC-MKS)   Family Appeal-Section 14 of Family Court Act

Matter called. Appellant is absent. Counsel for appellant is absent. His junior is present and filed application for condonation at Ex.3. Order on it. Process not issued by concerned clerk. The matter is being adjourned with last and final chance with directions to ensure the service upon respondents. In case of failure, appropriate order will be passed accordingly. In the interest of justice, Put off to -------------11-10-2025 for service. Issue fresh process against respondent on cost through court as well as through TCS with directions to submit delivery report of TCS to this court.

FAMILY JURISDICTION For Arguments
2 F.A. (Family Appeals) 15/2022 Mst. Irum VS Ghulam Murtaza   Afzal Karim()   Abdul Hafiz Mari(ADVO-1271-SBC-MKS),Ghulam Abbas Khan (ADVO-1261-SBC-MKS) Family Appeal-Section 14 of Family Court Act

Matter called.The appellant / plaintiff is absent. Mr. Afzal Karim Advocate is present. The defendant / Respondent is absent. Counsel for respondent is absent and he has sent adjournment application at Ex.23. Order on it. Perusal of case file,reveals that matter pertains to the year of 2022. Both the parties and their counsels are required to ensure progress on next date of hearing. In case of failure on the part of either party, appropriate order will be passed accordingly. Put off to -------30-09-2025 for arguments on Family appeal.