| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 223/2026 | Abdul Wahid VS The State | Afzal Karim() | Cr.PC-497,PPC-324 | 17/2026 Digri |
Matter called. Learned counsel for applicant / accused is absent; sent application seeking adjournment. Learned ADPP for the state is present. The complainant is absent. I.O of the case is absent. Put off to ---------- 03-03-2026 for hearing. Issue notice to the complainant. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 2 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 110/2025 | The State VS Sallahuddin & Another | ADPP(ADPP-0003-GOV-MPK) | Special Case Narcotics -9(1) 3 (a) | 44/2025 Naukot |
Matter called. Accused Salahuddin and Muharram Ali are present on bail. Learned APG for the state is present. Learned counsel for both accused is absent; for which the accused made verbal request for adjournment. Process returned. Mashir PC/ Waseem, PC/ Faheem and I.O / SIP Shoukat Ali are present and directed to attend. Put off to ---------- 24-03-2026 for trial. Accused are directed to attend. Issue summons to all P.Ws. Call case property. |
|
| 3 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 297/2025 | The State VS Shabbir Makrani | ADPP(ADPP-0003-GOV-MPK) | Sindh Arms Act 2013-23-i-A | 130/2025 Satellite Town |
Matter called. Accused Shabbir Makrani is present on bail. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Learned counsel for accused is absent; for which the accused made verbal request for adjournment. Process returned. No P.W is in attendance. Put off to ---------- 24-03-2026 for trial / hearing on application U/S 265-K Cr.P.C. Accused is directed to attend. Issue summons to all remaining P.Ws. Call case property. |
|
| 4 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 137/2025 | The State VS Ramesh Kumar | ADPP() | Special Case Narcotics -9(1) 3(c) | 6/2025 Excise Crime Circle Mps. |
Matter called. Accused Ramesh Kumar is present on bail. Learned APG for the state is present. Learned counsel for accused is absent; for which the accused made verbal request for adjournment. Process returned. Mashir EC/ Sahib Khan is present and seek condonation of the absence of complainant. Put off to ---------- 24-03-2026 for trial. Accused is directed to attend. Issue summons to all P.Ws. Call case property. |
|
| 5 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 23/2026 | The State VS Ali Hassan | Special Case Narcotics -9(1) 3 (a) | 2/2026 Mehmoodabad(Mpk) |
Matter called. Accused Ali Hassan produced in custody from C.P MPS. Learned APG for the state is present. Learned counsel for accused is present. Process returned. The deposition of WASI/ Abdul Razzak is recorded at Ex: -------- 07. Thereafter, learned APG for the state closed his side by given-up the remaining P.Ws vide statement at Ex: ------------ 08. Order on it. Filed. Put off to ---------- 07-03-2026 for statement of accused. Accused remanded back to custody with direction to produce on next date. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 6 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 324/2026 | Danish VS SHO PS Mirwah Gorchani & Ors | Raja Tanweer(ADVO-734-SBC-MKS) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Matter called. The applicant and his counsel are present. The respondents are absent. Learned ADPP for the state is present. The requisite report from DSP complaint Cell received. Arguments heard. Put off to -------- 04-03-2026 for ORDER. |
|
| 7 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 327/2026 | Mst: Nazia VS SHO PS Gharibabad & ORs | Ghulam Hussain(ADVO-607-SBC-MKS) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Matter called. The applicant and his counsel are present. The respondents are absent. Learned ADPP for the state is present. The requisite report from DSP complaint Cell received. Arguments heard. Put off to -------- 05-03-2026 for ORDER. |
|
| 8 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 325/2026 | Muhammad Umair VS SHO PS ST.TOWN & ORS | Shah Nawaz() | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Matter called. The applicant and his counsel are present. The respondents are absent. Learned ADPP for the state is present. The requisite report from DSP complaint Cell received. Arguments heard. Put off to -------- 04-03-2026 for ORDER. |
|
| 9 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 326/2026 | Shr: Heeri VS SHO PS Taluka & Ors | Muhammad Sultan(ADVO-1192-SBC-MKS) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Matter called. The applicants and their counsel are present. The respondents are absent. Learned ADPP for the state is present. The requisite report from DSP complaint Cell received. Arguments heard. Put off to -------- 05-03-2026 for ORDER. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 10 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 29/2026 | The State VS Abdul Razzaque and another | Kanwar Lal(ADVO-1038-SBC-MKS) | Special Case Narcotics -9(1) 3 (a) | 134/2025 Digri |
Matter called. Accused Abdul Razzak and Anwar are present on bail. Learned APG for the state is present. Learned counsel for accused is present. Mr. Muhammad Saleem Kumbhar Advocate filed vakalatnama for accused. Learned APG stated that police papers are not yet received from concerned Police station; hence, charge could not be framed. Put off to ---------- 05-03-2026 for Charge. Accused are directed to attend. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Statement of Accused | |||||||
| 11 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 139/2025 | The State VS Muhammad Nadeem | ADPP() | Special Case Narcotics -9(1) 3 (a) | 63/2025 Naukot |
Matter called. Accused Muhammad Nadeem produced in custody from C.P MPS. Learned APG for the state is present. Learned counsel for pauper accused is present. The statement of accused as provided U/S 342 Cr.P.C recorded at Ex: ------------ 09 wherein he denied the truth of allegation leveled against him. However, he declined to appear on oath and to lead evidence in his defense. Put off to ---------- 11-03-2026 for final arguments. Accused remanded back to custody with direction to produce on next date. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Final Arguments | |||||||
| 12 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 114/2025 | The State VS Muhammad Nasir and others | ADPP() | Special Case Narcotics -U/s 9(i) (Sr.No.06)-a Amendment SCNS Act-2024 | 44/2025 Mirpur Old |
Matter called. Accused Muhammad Nasir and Allah Bux are present on bail. Learned APG for the state is present. Learned counsel for accused is present; filed application seeking adjournment. Put off to ---------- 12-03-2026 for final arguments. Accused are directed to attend. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | C.T.A. (Civil Transfer Applications) 1/2026 |
Ashfaque Ahmed Through Attorney Muhammad Sohrab VS Ghulam Hussain Hidayatullah | IN PERSON (SELF)(ADVO-001-SBC-MKS) | Matter called. The attorney of the applicant namely Muhammad Sohrab is present person. The respondent No. 01 and his counsel are present; filed objection at Ex: --------- 07. Learned DDA for the state is present; filed statement at Ex: ---------- 08 wherein he stated that he shall directly argue the matter. The respondent No. 09 Arshad Hussain and his counsel are present. Mr. Zulfiquar Ali advocate filed vakalatnama for respondent No. 09. Comments already received from concerned Court. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open Court. The instant transfer application is dismissed in terms of order. Let the copy of order be sent to trial Court for information and compliance. |
|||
| 2 | C.T.A. (Civil Transfer Applications) 2/2026 |
Ashfaque Ahmed Through Attorney Muhammad Sohrab VS Arshad Hussain Hidaytullah & Others | IN PERSON (SELF)(ADVO-001-SBC-MKS) | Matter called. The attorney of the applicant namely Muhammad Sohrab is present person. The respondent No. 01 Arshad Hussain and his counsel are present. Mr. Zulfiquar Ali Laghari advocate filed vakalatnama for respondent No. 01 at Ex: --------- 05. The respondent No. 09 Ghulam Hussain is present; filed statement at Ex: -------- 06 wherein he shown his no interest. Learned DDA for the state is present; filed statement at Ex: ---------- 07 wherein he stated that he shall directly argue the matter. Comments already received from concerned Court. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open Court. The instant transfer application is dismissed in terms of order. Let the copy of order be sent to trial Court for information and compliance. |
|||
| 3 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 22/2026 |
Kirshan Kumar VS Aqeel Ahmed & Others | Nadeem(ADVO-542-SBC-MKS) | Matter called. The appellant Shabbir Ahmed is absent but his counsel is present. The respondents are absent. Learned DDA for official respondent No. 04 to 07 is present and filed Memo of at Ex: --------- 05. Order on it. File. Process returned served upon respondent No. 02 & 04 to 07 as per endorsement of the bailiffs. Hence, the service against respondent No. 02 & 03 to 07 is held as good. The R & Ps not received. Put off to --------- 09-03-2026 for service against Respondent No. 01 & 03, and objections from official respondent No. 02 & 04 to 07. Repeat process against the respondent No. 01 & 03 through bailiff as well as through all mode of service i-e TCS, Registered post AD including pasting but publication on costs. Call R & Ps from trial court. |
|||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 1 | F.A. (Family Appeals) 8/2026 | Geno VS Shrimati Meni | Muhammad Arif() | Family Appeal-Section 14 of Family Court Act | Matter called. The appellant is absent but his counsel is present; filed statement at Ex: --------- 04. Order on it. File. The respondent remained absent; despite of repeated calls. Hence, the matter is adjourned in the interest of justice. Put off to --------- 05-03-2026 for appearance of respondents / objection. |
||