| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 205/2026 | Mir Safdar Ali Talpur VS The State | Mir Ali() | Cr.PC-498 | 2/2026 FIA Crime Circle, Mirpurkhas |
Matter called. The applicant / accused is present on interim pre-arrest bail. Learned counsel for applicant / accused is present. A.D (L) FIA is present. The complainant is absent. IO of this case is present. Arguments heard. Order passed in open Court. The instant bail application is confirmed in terms of order. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 2 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 138/2025 | The State VS Atta Muhammad and another | ADPP(ADPP-0004-GOV-MPK) | Dileep Kumar (ADVO-1294-SBC-MKS) | Special Case Narcotics -9(1) 3 (a) | 58/2025 Naukot |
Matter called. Accused Atta Muhammad is present on bail. While, accused Amanullah produced in custody from C.P MPS. Learned APG for the state is present. Learned counsel for both the accused is present. Process returned. Two P.Ws are in attendance. The deposition of WHC/ Nawab and PC/ Muhammad Ismail is recorded at Ex: -------- 06 & 07. Thereafter, learned ADPP for the state closed his side by given-up the remaining P.Ws vide statement at Ex: ------------ 08. Order on it. Filed. Surety Muhammad Waris remained absent without intimation; though he is served through B.W. Put off to ---------- 17-03-2026 for Statement of accused / appearance of surety Muhammad Waris. Accused Atta Muhammad is directed to attend alongwith his surety Muhammad Waris. Accused Amanullah remanded back to custody with direction to produce on next date. Issue B.W against surety Muhammad Waris. |
| 3 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 144/2025 | The State VS Muhammad Kamran | ADPP() | Khalid Hussain (ADVO-1060-SBC-MKS) | Special Case Narcotics -9(1) 3 (a) | 104/2025 Jhudo |
Matter called. Accused Muhammad Kamran is present on bail; filed application seeking condonation of his last absence. Learned APG for the state is present. Learned counsel for accused is present; made verbal request seeking adjournment. Process returned. The I.O/ SIP Muhammad Yasin is present and directed to attend. Surety for accused namely Muhammad Irfan is present; submitted reply of show cause notice U/S 514 Cr.P.C. Order on it. Show cause notice vacated in terms of order. Put off to ---------- 28-03-2026 for trial. Accused is directed to attend. Issue summons to all P.Ws. Call case property. |
| 4 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 149/2025 | The State VS Sohrab | ADPP(ADPP-0003-GOV-MPK) | Special Case Narcotics -9(1) 3 (a) | 64/2025 Naukot |
Matter called. Accused Sohrab Tangri is present on bail. Learned APG for the state is present. Learned counsel for accused is present; made verbal request for adjournment. Process returned. The complainant ASI Muhammad Yousuf is present and directed to attend. Put off to ---------- 06-04-2026 for trial. Accused is directed to attend. Issue summons to all P.Ws. Call case property. |
|
| 5 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 1/2026 | The State VS Imran | ADPP(ADPP-0003-GOV-MPK) | Special Case Narcotics -9(1) 3 (a) | 93/2025 Jhudo |
Matter called. Accused Imran Manganhar is absent; though he is on bail. Learned APG for the state is present. Learned counsel for accused is present but he neither filed application seeking condonation of the absence of accused nor did he submit any intimation in this regard. Process returned. No P.W is in attendance. Put off to ---------- 06-04-2026 for trial. Issue B.W against accused and notice to his surety. Issue summons to all P.Ws. Call case property |
|
| 6 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 54/2026 | THE STATE VS AALAM | Khalid Hussain (ADVO-1060-SBC-MKS) | SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (I) A | 6/2026 Khan |
Matter called. Accused Aalam @ Aalo Mari produced in custody from C.P MPS. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Learned counsel for accused is present. Process returned. Three P.Ws are in attendance. The deposition of complainant ASI Saindad Raho is recorded is recorded at Ex: ------------ 03 who produced roznamcha entry, Memo of arrest and recovery and FIR at Ex: 03/A to C. The deposition of Mashir PC/ Meer Muhammad is recorded at Ex: ----------- 04 who produced Memo of site inspection at Ex: 04/A. The deposition of I.O/ ASI Muhammad Mubeen is recorded at Ex: ------------ 05 who produced Malkhana entries, roznamcha entries, letter to FSL and FSL report at Ex: 05/A to E. Put off to ---------- 18-03-2026 for trial. Accused is directed to attend. Issue summons to WHC/ Riaz Ahmed. Call case property. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 7 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 331/2026 | Noor Zaman VS SHO PS Phulladiyoon & Ors | Mir Muhammad() | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Matter called. The applicant and his counsel are present. The respondents are absent. Learned ADPP for the state is present. The requisite report from DSP complaint Cell already received. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced in open court. As per order, the instant application is disposed of in terms of order. Copy of the order be sent to SHO P.S concerned for information and compliance. |
|
| 8 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 377/2026 | Muhammad Ayoub VS SHO PS Town & Ors | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Matter called. The applicant and his counsel are present. The respondents are absent. Learned ADPP for the state is present. The requisite report from DSP complaint Cell received. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced in open court. As per order, the instant application is disposed of in terms of order. Copy of the order be sent to SHO P.S concerned for information and compliance. |
||
| 9 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 378/2026 | Mst: Mariam & Ors VS SHO PS Jhudo & Ors | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Matter called. The applicants and their counsel are present; filed statement showing correct P.S. The respondents are absent. Learned ADPP for the state is present. The requisite report from DSP complaint Cell received. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced in open court. As per order, the instant application is disposed of in terms of order. Copy of the order be sent to SHO P.S concerned for information and compliance. |
||
| 10 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 380/2026 | MSt: Noshaba Naz VS SHO PS Town & Ors | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Transferred to the court of learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Mirpurkhas for disposal according to law. |
||
| 11 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 376/2026 | Altaf Hussain VS SHO PS Mehran & Ors | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Matter called. The applicant and his counsel are present. The respondents are absent. Learned ADPP for the state is present. The requisite report from DSP complaint Cell received. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced in open court. As per order, the instant application is disposed of in terms of order. Copy of the order be sent to SHO P.S concerned for information and compliance. |
||
| 12 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 379/2026 | Shr: Janke VS SHO PS Taluka & Ors | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Matter called. The applicant and her counsel are present. The respondents are absent. Learned ADPP for the state is present. The requisite report from DSP complaint Cell received. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced in open court. As per order, the instant application is disposed of in terms of order. Copy of the order be sent to SHO P.S concerned for information and compliance. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Final Arguments | |||||||
| 13 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 238/2025 | The State VS Sultan Ahmed | Qaseem Bari(ADVO-658-SBC-MKS) | SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (I) A | 42/2025 Sindhri |
Matter called. Accused Sultan Ahmed is present on bail. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Learned counsel for accused is present; made verbal request for adjournment on the ground of preparation. Matter adjourned. Put off to ---------- 19-03-2026 for final arguments. Accused is directed to attend. |
|
| 14 | PPC 7/2026 | The State VS Sultan Ahmed & Others | ADPP(),Qaseem Bari(ADVO-658-SBC-MKS) | Sain Bux(ADVO-493-SBC-MKS) | PPC-324,PPC-34,PPC-353,PPC-399,PPC-402 | 40/2025 Sindhri |
Matter called. Accused Sultan Ahmed is present on bail. Accused Sabir Hussain and Wafadar are produced in custody from C.P MPS. While, accused Sikandar and Akhtar has already been declared to be proclaimed. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Learned counsel for accused Sultan is present. Learned counsel for accused/ UTPs Sabir Hussain and Wafadar is present. Learned counsel from either side made verbal request for adjournment on the ground of preparation. Matter adjourned. Put off to ---------- 19-03-2026 for final arguments. Accused Sultan is directed to attend. Accused Sabir Hussain and Wafadar remanded back to custody with direction to produce on next date. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Judgment | |||||||
| 15 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 96/2025 | The State VS Muhammad Iqbal @ Mujahid & ors | ADPP() | Special Case Narcotics -9(1) 3 (a) | 57/2025 Garibabad |
Matter called. Accused Muhammad Iqbal and Muhammad Khalid are produced in custody from C.P MPS. Learned APG for the state is present. Learned counsel for both accused is present. Judgment passed at Ex: ------ 11 and announced in open Court. As per Judgment, accused are acquitted U/S 265-H(i) Cr.P.C from the charge of the instant case / crime. Accused remanded back to custody. Issue release writ containing direction that they be released, forthwith, if not required in any other case / crime. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 22/2026 |
Kirshan Kumar VS Aqeel Ahmed & Others | Nadeem(ADVO-542-SBC-MKS) | Case is transferred to ADJ-I, Mirpurkhas, for disposal according to law. |
|||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 1 | F.A. (Family Appeals) 13/2026 | Umair VS Mst. Fatima | Taimoor Ali(ADVO-1253-SBC-MKS),Zaka Ullah(ADVO-1321-SBC-MKS) | Family Appeal-Section 14 of Family Court Act | Matter called. The appellant is absent but his counsel is present. The respondent remained absent on repeated calls. Let the matter be fixed for arguments. Put off to --------- 26-03-2026 for hearing. |
||