| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 72/2025 | The State VS Pir Altaf Hussain Jilani | ADPP(ADPP-0004-GOV-MPK) | Waheed Ali() | Special Case Narcotics -9(1) 3 (a) | 34/2025 Naukot |
Matter called. Accused Pir Altaf Hussain Shah is present on bail. Learned APG for the state is present. Learned counsel for accused is absent; sent application seeking adjournment. Order on it Adjournment granted. Process returned. The complainant ASI Gulzar and I.O/ SIP Shoukat are present and directed to attend. Put off to ---------- 29-04-2026 for trial. Accused is directed to attend. Issue summons to complainant ASI Gulzar, PC/ Ismail, WHC/ Nawab and I.O/ SIP Shoukat. Call case property. |
| 2 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 77/2025 | The State VS Sanaullah @ Sani | ADPP() | Special Case Narcotics -9(1) 3 (a) | 55/2025 Town(Mirpurkhas) |
Matter called. Accused Sanaullah @ Sani is present on bail. Learned APG for the state is present. Learned counsel for accused is absent; sent application seeking adjournment. Order on it. Adjournment granted. Process returned. Mashir Muhammad Imran are present and directed to attend. Put off to ---------- 28-04-2026 for trial. Accused is directed to attend. Issue summons to all complainant, mashir and I.O. Call case property. |
|
| 3 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 10/2026 | The State VS Shafique @ Sikio and others | ADPP(ADPP-0003-GOV-MPK) | Dilawar Hussain(),Dileep Kumar (ADVO-1294-SBC-MKS) | Special Case Narcotics -9(1) 3 (a) | 75/2025 Jhudo |
Matter called. Accused Shafique @ Sikiyo and Murad Manganhar are present on bail. Accused Ali Muhammad @ Sajjad produced in custody from C.P MPS; though he has obtained bail before arrest by this Court but not joined the trial. Learned APG for the state is present. Learned counsel for accused Shafique is absent; sent application seeking adjournment on the ground of general adjournment. Order on it. Adjournment granted. Learned counsel for accused Murad is present. Learned counsel for accused Ali Muhammad is absent. Process returned. The complainant ASI Muhammad Yaseen, mashir Mashooque Ali and I.O/ SIP Hassan Bux are present and directed to attend. Put off to ---------- 13-04-2026 for trial. Accused Shafique @ Sikiyo and Murad Manganhar are directed to attend. Accused Ali Muhammad remanded back to custody with direction to produce on next date. Issue summons to complainant, mashir and I.O. Call case property. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 4 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 467/2026 | Keeneth Lazarus VS SHO PS Mirpur Old & Ors | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Matter called. The applicant and his counsel are present. The respondents are absent. Learned ADPP for the state is present. The requisite report from DSP complaint Cell received. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced in open court. As per order, the instant application is disposed of in terms of order. Copy of the order be sent to SHO P.S concerned for information and compliance. |
||
| 5 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 468/2026 | Muhammad Hassan VS SHO PS Mehran & Ors | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Matter called. The applicant and his counsel are present and filed statement; wherein he prayed for issuance of direction to respondent No. 01 & 03 for protection. The respondents are absent. Learned ADPP for the state is present. The requisite report from DSP complaint Cell received. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced in open court. As per order, the instant application is disposed of in terms of order. Copy of the order be sent to SHO P.S concerned for information and compliance. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 6 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 95/2026 | THE STATE VS ABDUL SALAM LASHARI | ADPP(ADPP-0003-GOV-MPK) | SINDH ARMS ACT-26 | 2/2026 Satellite Town |
Matter called. Accused Abdul Salam Lashari produced in custody from C.P MPS. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Accused is un-represented yet; even the main case / crime No. 154/ 2025 reg: U/S 302 PPC with P.S St.Town is not yet received. Hence, Charge could not be framed. Put off to ---------- 14-04-2026 for Charge. Accused remanded back to custody with direction to produce on next date. |
|
| 7 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 96/2026 | THE STATE VS FATEH @ ABDUL FATEH LASHARI | ADPP(ADPP-0003-GOV-MPK) | SINDH ARMS ACT-25-A | 1/2026 Satellite Town |
Matter called. Accused Fateh @ Abdul Fateh produced in custody from C.P MPS. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Accused is un-represented yet; even the main case / crime No. 154/ 2025 reg: U/S 302 PPC with P.S St.Town is not yet received. Hence, Charge could not be framed. Put off to ---------- 14-04-2026 for Charge. Accused remanded back to custody with direction to produce on next date. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Statement of Accused | |||||||
| 8 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 211/2025 | The State VS Dost Ali Jarwar. | ADPP() | SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (I) A | 54/2025 Tando Jan Muhammad |
Matter called. Accused Dost Ali Jarwar is present on bail. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Learned counsel for accused is present. The statement of accused as provided U/S 342 Cr.P.C recorded at Ex: ------------ 09 wherein he denied the truth of allegation leveled against him. However, he declined to appear on oath and to lead evidence in his defense. Put off to ---------- 21-04-2026 for final arguments. Accused is directed to attend. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Final Arguments | |||||||
| 9 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 23/2026 | The State VS Ali Hassan | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | Special Case Narcotics -9(1) 3 (a) | 2/2026 Mehmoodabad(Mpk) |
Matter called. Accused Ali Hassan produced in custody from C.P MPS. Learned APG for the state is present. Learned counsel for accused is present. Final arguments heard. Learned counsel for accused made verbal request for grant of time to produce case law. Put off to ---------- 14-04-2026 for further arguments and Judgment. Accused remanded back to custody with direction to produce on next date. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | C.T.A. (Civil Transfer Applications) 3/2026 |
Assistant District Education Officer & Others VS Late Lachman Das & Others | DDA(DDA-002-GOV-MPK) | Matter called. The applicant No. 01 and DDA for state / applicants are present. The respondents are absent. Comments received from concerned Courts. Process returned un-served for want of proper address. Learned DDA requested for grant of time to furnish fresh / complete address on next date. Put off to ---------- 06-04-2026 for service/ fresh address of respondents. |
|||
| 2 | C.T.A. (Civil Transfer Applications) 4/2026 |
Mst. Fazilat Bibi VS Aurangzaib & Others | IN PERSON (SELF)(ADVO-001-SBC-MKS) | Matter called. The applicant and her counsel are present. The respondents are absent. Process not issued for want process fee. Mr. Noor Din advocate filed vakalatnama for applicant and application seeking condonation for the delay in depositing process fee. Order thereon. Comments received from concerned Court. Put off to ----------- 09-04-2026 for service. Issue process against respondent No. 01 & 02 through bailiff as well as all mode of service i-e TCS and registered post AD, including pasting except publication, on costs. |
|||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 1 | F.A. (Family Appeals) 8/2026 | Geno VS Shrimati Meni | Muhammad Arif() | Family Appeal-Section 14 of Family Court Act | Matter called. The appellant and his counsel are absent; sent application seeking adjournment. Order on it. Adjournment granted. The respondent remained absent; despite of repeated calls. The service against the respondent was held good on 19.02.2026 but since then neither she put her appearance in person or through any authorized counsel nor did she filed objection. Hence, the matter be fixed for arguments. Put off to --------- 14-04-2026 for arguments. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 2 | F.A. (Family Appeals) 15/2026 | Muhammad Atif VS Mst. Laiba & Another | Mushahid Hussain Khaskheli (ADVO-197-SBC-MTY) | Family Appeal-Section 14 of Family Court Act | Matter called. The appellant is absent but his counsel is present. The respondent No. 02 is absent but her counsel is present; filed statement at Ex: --------- 08 wherein he stated that he shall directly argue the appeal. Put off to --------- 15-04-2026 for hearing. |
||