| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 350/2026 | Asad Ali VS The State | Cr.PC-497 | 20/2026 Mehmoodabad(Mpk) |
Matter called. Learned counsel for applicant / accused is present. Learned APG for the state is present. The complainant is absent. I.O of the case is absent. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced in open court. As per order, the instant application is granted subject to furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs. 30,000/- and PR Bond in the like amount. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 2 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 317/2026 | Muhammad Faisal & Ors VS The State | Cr.PC-498 | 6/2025 FIA Crime Circle, Mirpurkhas |
Matter called. The applicants / accused are present on interim pre-arrest bail. Learned counsel for applicants / accused is present. A.D (L) FIA Miss. Sindhu is present; filed memo of appearance. The complainant is absent. IO of this case is absent. Arguments heard. Order passed in open Court. The instant bail application is confirmed in terms of order. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 3 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 131/2025 | The State VS Sultan | ADPP(ADPP-0004-GOV-MPK) | Dileep Kumar (ADVO-1294-SBC-MKS) | Special Case Narcotics -9(1) 3 (a) | 81/2025 Jhudo |
Matter called. Accused Sultan Khaskheli is present on bail. Learned APG for the state is present. Learned counsel for accused is present. Process returned viz: B.W against surety namely Sodho returned un-served vide endorsement submitted by ASI Arbab Ali. On enquiry he admitted that he signed the endorsement with the seal of SHO. Neither he recorded the statements of persons of locality nor did he offered any plausible explanation for non-execution. Hence, show cause notice be issued to him; requiring explanation that as to why he should not be penalized under the relevant provision of law. Process returned. Two P.Ws are in attendance. The deposition of complainant ASI Mubarik is recorded is recorded at Ex: ------------ 03 who produced roznamcha entries, Memo of arrest and recovery, photographs and FIR at Ex: 03/A to F. The deposition of Mashir HC/ Ghulam Muhammad is recorded at Ex: ----------- 04 who produced Memo of site inspection and memo of seizure at Ex: 04/A & B. Put off to ---------- 06-05-2026 for trial. Accused is directed to attend alongwith his surety. Issue B.W against surety Sodho. Issue show cause notice to ASI Arbab Ali for the aforesaid reasons. Issue summons to I.O/ SIP Hassan Bux, PC/ Ismail and WHC/ Allahdino. Call case property. |
| 4 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 336/2025 | The State VS Altaf Hussain | ADPP() | SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (I) A | 7/2025 Mirpurkhas (CTD) |
Transferred to the court of learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Mirpurkhas for disposal according to law. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 5 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 511/2026 | Mst: Saira & Ors VS SHO PS KGM & Ors | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Matter called. The applicants are absent but their counsel is present and filed statement; through which he withdrawn the instant application. The respondents are absent. Learned ADPP for the state is present. The requisite report from DSP complaint Cell received. Order passed on separate sheet and announced in open court. As per order, the instant application is dismissed as withdrawn in terms of order. |
||
| 6 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 512/2026 | Mst: Mahnoor & Ors VS SHO PS Mehmoodabad & Ors | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Matter called. The applicants and their counsel are present. The respondents are absent. Learned ADPP for the state is present. The requisite report from DSP complaint Cell received. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced in open court. As per order, the instant application is disposed of in terms of order. Copy of the order be sent to SHO P.S concerned for information and compliance. |
||
| 7 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 503/2026 | Mst: Rubina & Ors VS SHO PS Taluka & Ors | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Matter called. The applicants and their counsel are present. The respondents are absent. Learned ADPP for the state is present. The requisite report from DSP complaint Cell received. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced in open court. As per order, the instant application is disposed of in terms of order. Copy of the order be sent to SHO P.S concerned for information and compliance. |
||
| 8 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 504/2026 | Mst: Aisha & Ors VS SHO PS Jhudo & Ors | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Matter called. The applicants and their counsel are present and filed statement; through which he not pressed the instant application. The respondents are absent. Learned ADPP for the state is present. The requisite report from DSP complaint Cell received. Order passed on separate sheet and announced in open court. As per order, the instant application is dismissed as not pressed in terms of order. |
||
| 9 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 509/2026 | Shr: Paras VS SHO PS Sindhri & Ors | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Matter called. The applicant is absent but her counsel is present and filed statement; through which he withdrawn the instant application. The respondents are absent. Learned ADPP for the state is present. The requisite report from DSP complaint Cell received. Order passed on separate sheet and announced in open court. As per order, the instant application is dismissed as withdrawn in terms of order. |
||
| 10 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 505/2026 | Muhammad Ali VS SHO PS Town & Ors | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Matter called. The applicant and his counsel are present. The respondents are absent. Learned ADPP for the state is present. The requisite report from DSP complaint Cell received. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced in open court. As per order, the instant application is disposed of in terms of order. Copy of the order be sent to SHO P.S concerned for information and compliance. |
||
| 11 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 507/2026 | Mst: Hurema & Ors VS SHO PS Mehmoodabad & Ors | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Matter called. The applicants and their counsel are present. The respondents are absent. Learned ADPP for the state is present. The requisite report from DSP complaint Cell received. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced in open court. As per order, the instant application is disposed of in terms of order. Copy of the order be sent to SHO P.S concerned for information and compliance. |
||
| 12 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 506/2026 | Zohaib VS SHO PS Mehmoodabad & Ors | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Matter called. The applicant and his counsel are present. The respondents are absent. Learned ADPP for the state is present. The requisite report from DSP complaint Cell received. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced in open court. As per order, the instant application is disposed of in terms of order. Copy of the order be sent to SHO P.S concerned for information and compliance. |
||
| 13 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 508/2026 | Haresh VS SHO PS Jhudo & Ors | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Matter called. The applicant is absent but his counsel is present and filed statement; through which he withdrawn the instant application. The respondents are absent. Learned ADPP for the state is present. The requisite report from DSP complaint Cell received. Order passed on separate sheet and announced in open court. As per order, the instant application is dismissed as withdrawn in terms of order. |
||
| 14 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 510/2026 | Mst: Zahran & Ors VS SHO PS Mehmoodabad & Ors | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Matter called. The applicants and their counsel are present. The respondents are absent. Learned ADPP for the state is present. The requisite report from DSP complaint Cell received. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced in open court. As per order, the instant application is disposed of in terms of order. Copy of the order be sent to SHO P.S concerned for information and compliance. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 15 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 99/2026 | The State VS Nawab Khaskheli | ADPP() | SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (i) (a) | 28/2026 Digri |
Matter called. Accused Nawab Khaskheli is present on bail. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Learned counsel for accused is present. Charge framed against the accused as provided U/S 265-D Cr.P.C at Ex: ----------- 02 to which he plead not guilty and claimed to be tried; such plea recorded at Ex: 02/A. Put off to ---------- 07-05-2026 for trial. Accused is directed to attend. Issue summons to complainant, Mashir and I.O. Call case property. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Statement of Accused | |||||||
| 16 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 32/2025 | The State VS Khalid | ADPP() | Dileep Kumar (ADVO-1294-SBC-MKS) | SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (I) A | 2/2025 Jhudo |
Matter called. Accused Khalid Chandio is present on bail. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Learned counsel for accused is present. The statement of accused as provided U/S 342 Cr.P.C recorded at Ex: ------------ 09 wherein he denied the truth of allegation leveled against him. However, he declined to appear on oath and to lead evidence in his defense. Put off to ---------- 07-05-2026 for final arguments. Accused is directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Final Arguments | |||||||
| 17 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 150/2025 | The State VS Ali Shan @ Dharo | ADPP(ADPP-0003-GOV-MPK) | Special Case Narcotics -9(1) 3 (a) | 100/2025 Jhudo |
Matter called. Accused Ali Shan @ Dharo is present on bail. Learned APG for the state is present. Learned counsel for accused is absent; for which the accused made verbal request for adjournment on the ground that his counsel is on general adjournment. Matter adjourned in the interest of justice. Put off to ---------- 07-05-2026 for final arguments. Accused is directed to attend. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Judgment | |||||||
| 18 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 2/2026 | The State VS Muhammad Jameel | ADPP() | Special Case Narcotics -U/S 9(2)-2-CNS | 90/2025 Garibabad |
Matter called. Accused Muhammad Jameel produced in custody from C.P MPS. Learned APG for the state is present. Learned counsel for accused is present. Judgment passed at Ex: ------ 10 and announced in open Court. As per Judgment, accused is acquitted U/S 265-H(i) Cr.P.C from the charge of the instant case / crime. Accused remanded back to custody. Issue release writ containing direction that he be released, forthwith, if not required in any other case / crime. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION Compliance | |||||||
| 1 | S. Ex. (Summary Executions) 3/2019 |
Muhammad Yousuf VS Israr Ahmed | Ghulam Nabi (ADVO-512-SBC-MKS) | Wishan Das(ADVO-544-SBC-MKS) | Matter called. The plaintiff / DH is absent but his counsel is present and filed statement; through which he prayed for disposed of the proceedings of the instant execution application being satisfied. The defendant/ JD Israr Ahmed and his counsel are absent. NADRA authorities submitted compliance report regarding un-blocking the CNIC of defendant / JD. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open Court. The proceedings of the instant execution application has been disposed of being satisfied. |
||
| 2 | S. Ex. (Summary Executions) 7/2021 |
Ahmed Ali Khan VS Muhammad Asif Memon | Muhammad Asif(ADVO-372-SBC-MKS) | Kamran Bhatti(ADVO-630-SBC-MKS) | Matter called. The plaintiff / DH is absent but his counsel is present and filed statement; through which he prayed for disposed of the proceedings of the instant execution application being satisfied. The JD Muhammad Asif and his counsel are absent. Process viz: NBW returned un-executed. NADRA already submitted report that CNIC of defendant / J.D has been Digitally impounded. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open Court. The proceedings of the instant execution application has been disposed of being satisfied. Issue letter to NADRA authorities to un-blocking the CNIC of defendant / JD. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 3 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 39/2026 |
Ghulam Ali & Others Through Attorney Ghulam Ali VS Ghulam Abbas @ Abbas & Others | Qadir Bux(ADVO-896-SBC-MKS),Taimoor Ali(ADVO-1253-SBC-MKS) | Case transferred to ADJ-II, Mirpurkhas for disposal according to law. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 4 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 8/2026 |
Shahid Younus VS Muhammad Bux & Others | Muhammad Imran() | Case transferred to ADJ-II, Mirpurkhas for disposal according to law. |
|||