| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 86/2025 | The State VS Tanveer | ADPP(ADPP-0003-GOV-MPK) | SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (I) A | 3/2025 Khan |
Matter called. Accused Tanveer Rajput is present on bail. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Learned counsel for accused is present. Process returned. Two P.Ws are in attendance. The deposition of complainant ASI Muhammad Mubeen is recorded is recorded at Ex: ------------ 03 who produced roznamcha entries, Memo of arrest and recovery and FIR at Ex: 03/A to D. The deposition of Mashir PC/ Taj Muhammad is recorded at Ex: ----------- 04 who produced Memo of site inspection at Ex: 04/A. Put off to ---------- 31-01-2026 for trial. Accused is directed to attend. Issue summons to all remaining P.Ws. Call case property. |
|
| 2 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 82/2025 | The State VS Heero | DDPP() | Special Case Narcotics -9(1) 3 (a) | 45/2025 Taluka(Mirpurkhas) |
Matter called. Accused Heero is present on bail. Learned APG for the state is present. Learned counsel for accused is present; filed application seeking adjournment. Process returned. The I.O/ SIP Zubair and WHC/ Ghulam Mustufa are present and directed to attend. Put off to ---------- 29-01-2026 for trial. Accused is directed to attend. Issue summons to all remaining P.Ws. Call case property. |
|
| 3 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 131/2025 | The State VS Sultan | ADPP(ADPP-0004-GOV-MPK) | Special Case Narcotics -9(1) 3 (a) | 81/2025 Jhudo |
Matter called. Accused Sultan Khaskheli is present on bail. Learned APG for the state is present. Learned counsel for accused is present. Process returned. No P.W is in attendance. Put off to ---------- 29-01-2026 for trial. Accused is directed to attend. Issue summons to all P.Ws. Call case property. |
|
| 4 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 138/2025 | The State VS Atta Muhammad and another | ADPP(ADPP-0004-GOV-MPK) | Special Case Narcotics -9(1) 3 (a) | 58/2025 Naukot |
Matter called. Accused Atta Muhammad is present on bail. While, accused Amanullah produced in custody from C.P MPS. Learned APG for the state is present. Learned counsel for both the accused is present. Mr. Dileep Kumar Kolhi advocate filed vakalatnama for both accused and application seeking adjournment. Order thereon. Adjournment granted. Process returned. The complainant ASI Muhammad Yakoob, mashir PC/ Boorji and I.O/ SIP Shoukat Ali are present and directed to attend. Put off to ---------- 21-01-2026 for trial. Accused Atta Muhammad is directed to attend. Accused Amanullah remanded back to custody with direction to produce on next date. Issue summons to all P.Ws. Call case property. |
|
| 5 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 297/2025 | The State VS Shabbir Makrani | ADPP(ADPP-0003-GOV-MPK) | Sindh Arms Act 2013-23-i-A | 130/2025 Satellite Town |
Matter called. Accused Shabbir Makrani is present on bail. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Learned counsel for accused is present. Process returned. Two P.Ws are in attendance. The deposition of complainant ASI Muhammad Bux Mari is recorded is recorded at Ex: ------------ 03 who produced roznamcha entries, Memo of arrest and recovery and FIR at Ex: 03/A to D. The deposition of Mashir PC/ Ravi Shankar is recorded at Ex: ----------- 04 who produced Memo of site inspection at Ex: 04/A. Learned ADPP for the state filed application U/S 540 Cr.P.C for calling P.W Azhar to be witnesses. Learned counsel for accused extended no objection on application U/S 540 Cr.P.C, hence, the same is allowed by consent. Put off to ---------- 28-01-2026 for trial. Accused is directed to attend. Issue summons to all remaining P.Ws. Call case property. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 491 | |||||||
| 6 | Habeas Corpus 9/2026 | Ali Hyder VS SHO PS Mehran & Ors | Cr.PC-491 | / |
Transferred to the court of learned IInd Additional Sessions Judge, Mirpurkhas for disposal according to law. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 7 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 86/2026 | Nagjee VS SHO PS Town & Ors | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Matter called. The applicant is absent but his counsel is present; filed application seeking condonation of the absence of applicant. Order on it. Absence condoned. The respondents are absent. Learned ADPP for the state is present. The requisite report from SHO P.S concerned received. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced in open court. As per order, the instant application is disposed of in terms of order. Copy of the order be sent to SHO P.S concerned for information and compliance. |
||
| 8 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 85/2026 | Ajmeeri VS SHO PS Town & Ors | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Matter called. The applicant and his counsel are present. The respondents are absent. Learned ADPP for the state is present. The requisite report from SHO P.S concerned received. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced in open court. As per order, the instant application is disposed of in terms of order. Copy of the order be sent to SHO P.S concerned for information and compliance. |
||
| 9 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 82/2026 | Mevo VS SHO PS KGM & ORs | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Matter called. The applicant is absent but his counsel is present and filed statement; through which he withdrawn the instant application. The respondents are absent. Learned ADPP for the state is present. The requisite report from SHO P.S concerned received. Order passed on separate sheet and announced in open court. As per order, the instant application is dismissed as withdrawn in terms of order. Copy of the order be sent to SHO P.S concerned for information and compliance. |
||
| 10 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 83/2026 | Mst: Farzana & Ors VS SHO PS Mehmoodabad & Ors | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Matter called. The applicant and his counsel are present. The respondents are absent. Learned ADPP for the state is present. The requisite report from SHO P.S concerned received. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced in open court. As per order, the instant application is disposed of in terms of order. Copy of the order be sent to SHO P.S concerned for information and compliance. |
||
| 11 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 80/2026 | Zafar Ali VS SHO PS Sindhri & Ors | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Matter called. The applicant and his counsel are present. The respondents are absent. Learned ADPP for the state is present. The requisite report from SHO P.S concerned received. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced in open court. As per order, the instant application is disposed of in terms of order. Copy of the order be sent to SHO P.S concerned for information and compliance. |
||
| 12 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 84/2026 | Dr. Muhammad Amin VS SHO PS Digri & Ors | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Matter called. The applicant and his counsel are present. The respondents are absent. Learned ADPP for the state is present. The requisite report from SHO P.S concerned received. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced in open court. As per order, the instant application is disposed of in terms of order. Copy of the order be sent to SHO P.S concerned for information and compliance. |
||
| 13 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 81/2026 | Manzoor Qadir VS SHO PS Naukot & Ors | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Matter called. The applicant is absent but his counsel is present; filed application seeking condonation of the absence of applicant. Order on it. Absence condoned. The respondents are absent. Learned ADPP for the state is present. The requisite report from SHO P.S concerned received. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced in open court. As per order, the instant application is disposed of in terms of order. Copy of the order be sent to SHO P.S concerned for information and compliance. |
||
| 14 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 88/2026 | Sajjad VS SHO PS Gharibabad & Ors | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Matter called. The applicant and his counsel are present. The respondents are absent. Learned ADPP for the state is present. The requisite report from SHO P.S concerned received. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced in open court. As per order, the instant application is disposed of in terms of order. Copy of the order be sent to SHO P.S concerned for information and compliance. |
||
| 15 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 87/2026 | Bhojo VS SHO PS Town & Ors | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Matter called. The applicant is absent but his counsel is present; filed application seeking condonation of the absence of applicant. Order on it. Absence condoned. The respondents are absent. Learned ADPP for the state is present. The requisite report from SHO P.S concerned received. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced in open court. As per order, the instant application is disposed of in terms of order. Copy of the order be sent to SHO P.S concerned for information and compliance. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 16 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 151/2025 | The State VS Arif @ Guro | ADPP(ADPP-0005-GOV-MPK) | Special Case Narcotics -9(1) 3 (a) | 51/2025 Mirwah(Mpk) |
Matter called. Accused Muhammad Arif @ Guru is present on bail. Learned APG for the state is present. Accused appeared in person. Charge framed against the accused as provided U/S 265-D Cr.P.C at Ex: ----------- 02 to which he plead not guilty and claimed to be tried; such plea recorded at Ex: 02/A. Put off to ---------- 31-01-2026 for trial. Accused is directed to attend. Issue summons to all P.Ws. Call case property. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Statement of Accused | |||||||
| 17 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 130/2025 | The State VS Dildar | ADPP(ADPP-0003-GOV-MPK) | SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (i) (a) | 5/2025 Mirpurkhas (CTD) |
Matter called. Accused Dildar is present on bail. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Learned counsel for accused is present. The statement of accused as provided U/S 342 Cr.P.C recorded at Ex: ------------ 09 wherein he denied the truth of allegation leveled against him. However, he declined to appear on oath and to lead evidence in his defense. Put off to ---------- 22-01-2026 for final arguments. Accused is directed to attend. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Final Arguments | |||||||
| 18 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 323/2024 | The State VS Nazar Hussain | ADPP(ADPP-0004-GOV-MPK) | Dileep Kumar (ADVO-1294-SBC-MKS) | SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (I) A | 64/2024 Naukot |
Matter called. Accused Nazar Hussain is present on bail. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Learned counsel for accused is present. Final arguments heard. Judgment passed at Ex: ------ 10 and announced in open Court. As per Judgment, accused persons are acquitted U/S 265-H(i) Cr.P.C from the charge of instant case / crime. They are present on bail, their bail bond stands cancelled and surety discharged. |
| 19 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 324/2024 | The State VS Ali Hassan | ADPP(ADPP-0004-GOV-MPK) | Dileep Kumar (ADVO-1294-SBC-MKS) | SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (I) A | 63/2024 Naukot |
Matter called. Accused Ali Hassan is present on bail. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Learned counsel for accused is present. Final arguments heard. Judgment passed at Ex: ------ 10 and announced in open Court. As per Judgment, accused persons are acquitted U/S 265-H(i) Cr.P.C from the charge of instant case / crime. They are present on bail, their bail bond stands cancelled and surety discharged. |
| 20 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 322/2024 | The State VS Muhammad Ibrahim | ADPP(ADPP-0004-GOV-MPK) | Dileep Kumar (ADVO-1294-SBC-MKS) | SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (I) A | 65/2024 Naukot |
Matter called. Accused Muhammad Ibrahim is present on bail. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Learned counsel for accused is present. Final arguments heard. Judgment passed at Ex: ------ 10 and announced in open Court. As per Judgment, accused persons are acquitted U/S 265-H(i) Cr.P.C from the charge of instant case / crime. They are present on bail, their bail bond stands cancelled and surety discharged. |
| 21 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 37/2025 | The State VS Muhammad Asad @ Billa | Dilawar Hussain() | Special Case Narcotics -U/s 9(i) (Sr.No.06)-a Amendment SCNS Act-2024 | 13/2025 Mehmoodabad(Mpk) |
Matter called. Accused Muhammad Asad @ Billa is present on bail. Learned APG for the state is present. Learned counsel for accused is present; filed application seeking adjournment. Order on it. Adjournment granted. Put off to ---------- 19-01-2026 for final arguments. Accused is directed to attend. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | C.T.A. (Civil Transfer Applications) 24/2025 |
Saad Noor Veesar VS Mst. Amna & Another | IN PERSON (SELF)(ADVO-001-SBC-MKS) | Matter called. The applicant and his counsel are present. The respondent remained absent without intimation. Learned DA for the state is present. Comments received from concerned Court. Arguments heard. Put off to ------------- 17-01-2026 for ORDER. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 2 | C.Rev. (Civil Revisions) 43/2025 |
Muhammad Mureed VS Mst. Mehran & Others | Nabi Bux Narejo(ADVO-404-SBC-MKS) | Case Transferred to ADJ-I, Mirpurkhas for disposal according to law. |
|||
| 3 | C.Rev. (Civil Revisions) 44/2025 |
Muhammad Mureed VS Mst. Mehran & Others | Nabi Bux Narejo(ADVO-404-SBC-MKS) | Case Transferred to ADJ-I, Mirpurkhas for disposal according to law. |
|||
| 4 | C.T.A. (Civil Transfer Applications) 25/2025 |
Muhammad Naveed VS Mst. Akhtari | Dilawar Hussain() | Matter called. The applicant is absent but his counsel is present. The respondent and his counsel are absent; sent application seeking adjournment. Order on it. Adjournment granted. Comments already received from concerned Courts. Since, the objection has not filed. Let the matter be fixed for arguments. Put off to --------- 19-01-2026 for hearing. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 5 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 88/2025 |
Saqib & Others VS Muhammad Ali & Others | Wishan Das(ADVO-544-SBC-MKS) | Matter called. The attorney of appellants namely Saqib and his counsel are present; filed application seeking adjournment. Order on it. Adjournment granted. The respondents are absent but learned counsel for respondent No. 01 & 02 is present. Learned DDA for official respondent No. 03 to 06 is present. Put off to --------- 19-01-2026 for hearing. |
|||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 15/2025 | Mst. Misran VS Irshad Ali & Others | Sikandar Ali Kolachi(ADVO-361-SBC-MKS) | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-372 | Case Transferred to ADJ-I, Mirpurkhas for disposal according to law. |
||