| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | PPC 48/2026 | The State VS Bheemon Kolhi and others. | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-THP),Perma Nand(ADVO-76-SBC-THP) | Shanker Lal (ADVO-99-SBC-THP) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-Fii,PPC-337-L,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | 16/2026 Diplo |
Case called. All accused are present on bail. ADPP for State is absent, but Naib Court is present. Mr. Perma Nand Advocate for complainant is present. Mr. Shankar Lal Meghwar Adv for accused persons is present and filed application U/S 249/A Cr.P.C at Exh.03. Order passed on it. Copy to otherside/ADPP. Complainant & PWs Ramchand & Nehal are present. Learned counsel of complainant submitted application for adjournment. Order passed on it. Adjournment allowed. Present P.Ws are bound down. Put off to....24.08.2026 for hearing of application U/S 249/A Cr.P.C & for evidence. All accused are directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 2 | PPC 56/2026 | The State VS Khadim Hussain Lund and others. | Perma Nand(ADVO-76-SBC-THP) | Khair Muhammad (ADVO-326-SBC-BDN) | PPC-337-Fi,PPC-337-Fiii,PPC-34,PPC-447,PPC-504,PPC-506 | 33/2026 Kaloi |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Pre-Trial | |||||||
| 1 | F.S. (Family Suits) 22/2026 | Sht: Samatra VS Aneel Meghwar | Moula Bux(ADVO-96-SBC-THP) | Perma Nand(ADVO-76-SBC-THP) | Hindu Marriage Act 2018 -1 | ||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 2 | F.S. (Family Suits) 14/2026 | Ravichand Menghwar VS Sht: Neelam d/o Lachman | Khair Muhammad (ADVO-326-SBC-BDN) | Shanker Lal (ADVO-99-SBC-THP) | Hindu Marriage Act 2018 -1 | ||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Exparte Evidence | |||||||
| 3 | F.S. (Family Suits) 26/2026 | Mst: Rehana Parveen VS Mukhtiar s/o Ismail Hajam | Perma Nand(ADVO-76-SBC-THP) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-THP) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Family Suit called. Plaintiff is present, her counsel is present. Defendant called absent, as he is already debarred. Expartee evidence of Plaintiff is recorded at Exh:08, he filed affidavit in Expartee proof at Exh:08/A. Learned counsel for plaintiff closed the evidence side vide his statement at Exh:09. After having perused the relevant record. Expartee Order passed at Exh.10 and announced in open Court. As per Order, Suit of the plaintiff is expartee decreed. Khula is granted. Decree prepared at Exh:11, Copy of the Order and decree is provided to concerned authorities for information and compliance of section 21 of West Pakistan Family Court Act 1964. |
|