CIVIL JUDGE & JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DIPLO : 21-OCT-2026

S.NO. CASE NO NAME OF PARTIES ADVOCATES UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS FIR No. Hearing Status
Party Side 1 Party Side 2

CRIMINAL JURISDICTION

S.NO. CASE NO NAME OF PARTIES ADVOCATES UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS FIR No. Hearing Status
Party Side 1 Party Side 2
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C)
1 Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 57/2026 Veenjhraj S/o Jetho Thakur VS The State   Rameesh Kumar(ADVO-54701-SBC-THR)   ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-THP)   Hudood Ordinances-3/4 PEHO 62/2026
Diplo

Criminal bail application called. Mr. Keemat Rai, Learned Advocate for applicant/accused is present. I/C ADPP for State is absent, but Naib Court is present. Arguments heard & perused the relevant papers. Order passed and announced in open Court, as per order, bail is granted to applicant/accused in crime No.62/2026, U/A 3/4 PEHOof P.S Diplo, subject to furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs.30000/- (Rupees Thirty thousand), with PR bond in the like amount. One Ramoon S/o Jetho, by caste Thakur, R/o village Katho, appeared and stood surety for accused Veenjh Raj, he produced six saving certificates each of Rs.5000/- Total thirty thousand, along with affidavit. Order passed on affidavit. Surety accepted, subject to verification of surety documents. Issue release letter of accused Veenjh Raj. Issue letter for mortgage of surety papers. B.A disposed off accordingly.

CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence
2 PPC 99/2025 The State VS Guloo and four others.   ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-THP),Perma Nand(ADVO-76-SBC-THP)   Keemat Rai(ADVO-60-SBC-THP)   PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-Fv,PPC-504,PPC-506-B 35/2025
Kaloi

Case called. All accused are present on bail. ADPP for State is absent, but Naib Court is present. Mr. Perma Nand learned counsel for complainant is present. Complainant is present, while no P.Ws are present. Mr. Keemat Rai, learned counsel for accused persons is present and submitted application for adjournment of the case on the ground that set of witnesses not complete. Order passed on it. Adjournment allowed. Put off to ......03.11.2026, for evidence. Complainant is directed to produce his witnesses. Accused are directed to attend.

FAMILY JURISDICTION

S.NO. CASE NO NAME OF PARTIES ADVOCATES UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS Hearing Status
Party Side 1 Party Side 2
FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service
1 F.S. (Family Suits) 31/2026 Mst: Taja d/o Allah Bachayo VS Azam s/o Bhoro Kallar   Khair Muhammad (ADVO-326-SBC-BDN)   ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-THP) Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance

Family Suit called. Plaintiff is present. Mr. Khair Muhammad Advocate for plaintiff is present. Plaintiff filed application for withdrawn from the suit at Exh.09. In view of statement of plaintiff suit stands dismissed as withdrawn.

FAMILY JURISDICTION Pre-Trial
2 F.S. (Family Suits) 30/2026 Mst. Parveena Lund VS Khan Muhammad Lund.   Rameesh Kumar(ADVO-54701-SBC-THR)   Keemat Rai(ADVO-60-SBC-THP) Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance

Family Suit called. Plaintiff is absent; her counsel Mr. Ramesh is also absent. Defendant is present. Mr. Keemat Rai Advocate for defendant is present. In the interest of justice suit adjourned to.......23.10.2026 for pre-trial.

3 F.S. (Family Suits) 33/2026 Muhammad Ramzan Lund. VS Mst:Mandhi D/o Jumman, Lund   Keemat Rai(ADVO-60-SBC-THP)   ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-THP) Family Suit-Restitution of Conjugal Rights

Family Suit called. Plaintiff is present, his learned counsel Mr. Keemat Rai is present. Defendant is present. Mr. Khair Muhammad Learned counsel for defendant is present. Today this suit is fixed for Pre-Trial under Section 10(3) of Family Courts Act, 1964. Both parties are present, efforts for reconciliation made, during pre trial plaintiff/husband Muhammad Ramzan has filed application at Ex.11 stating that he has pronounced Talaq to defendant/his wife Mst. Mandhi today on 21-10-2026 before witnesses namely (1) Ahmed Khan S/o Allah Dino and (2) Mashooque Ali S/o Muhammad Ibraheem, he does not want to keep defendant as his wife and does not want to press his suit for conjugal rights. Defendant Mst. Mandhi present in court admits that Talaq has been pronounced upon her today in Court premises by plaintiff before above named witnesses, she accepts Talaq. So far as minor daughter Mst. Jamela aged about 02 months is concerned, plaintiff has shown his willingness to pay maintenance of minor daughter. Plaintiff will pay maintenance of minor daughter at the rate of Rs. 5000/- per month. Defendant accepts the said offer by way of consent, joint statement of both parties on record. In view of above, plaintiff Muhammad Ramzan has pronounced Talaq today on 21-10-2026 to defendant Mst. Mandhi before witnesses Ahmed Khan S/o Allah Dino and Mashooque Ali S/o Muhammad Ibraheem. The Talaq between parties is hereby held as pronounced. Suit of plaintiff for Conjugal Rights stands dismissed. Further minor daughter Mst. Jamela is entitle for her maintenance, plaintiff with consent accepted, plaintiff shall pay Rs. 5000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) per month as monthly maintenance to minor daughter from today i.e. 21-10-2026 till her legal entitlement. However per year increase not mentioned in consent statement but same is settled principle that in maintenance of minor with spent of time increase must be mentioned, therefore 10 % increase per years reckoned from date of this order. The maintenance shall be paid/deposited in Court by 10th of each month. No order as to costs. Let the decree be prepared accordingly.

4 F.S. (Family Suits) 32/2026 Mst: Khatijan D/o Nimro VS Abdul Razaque s/o Rabdino Lund   Keemat Rai(ADVO-60-SBC-THP)   ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-THP) Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance

Family Suit called. Plaintiff is absent; her counsel Mr. Keemat Rai is present. Defendant is present. Mr. Ramesh Kumar Advocate for defendant is absent. In the interest of justice suit adjourned to.......23.10.2026 for pre-trial.