| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | PPC 88/2026 | The State VS Abdul Jabbar and another | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-THP) | Perma Nand(ADVO-76-SBC-THP) | PPC-114,PPC-337-Fv,PPC-34,PPC-504 | 50/2026 Diplo |
Case called. Accused Abdul Jabbar is present on bail, while accused Salah is absent. I/C ADPP for State is absent, but Naib Court is present. Photostat copies of police papers supplied to present accused atExh.01. Mr. Perma Nand Advocate for accused submitted application for excuse the absence of accused Saleh. Order passed on it. Absence condoned. Put off to....19.10.2026 for appearance of accused Saleh & supply of copies. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 2 | Other CR/Sessions Cases (If Any) 84/2026 | The State VS Nisar and another. | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-THP) | Khair Muhammad (ADVO-326-SBC-BDN) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8 | 38/2026 Kaloi |
Case called. Both accused are present on bail. Mr. Khair Muhammad Learned Advocate for accused persons is present. I/C ADPP for State is absent, but Naib Court is present. Process returned partly served. Complainant is present, while P.Ws are absent. Complainant submitted application for adjournment of the case on the ground that he is not feeling well. Repeat summon to all P.Ws except complainant. Call case property. Put off to......22.10.2026 for evidence. Both accused are directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Supply of Copies | |||||||
| 3 | PPC 85/2026 | Abdul Latif Lund VS Arab Nohri and seven others. | Rameesh Kumar(ADVO-54701-SBC-THR) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-THP) | PPC-114,PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-429,PPC-506-B | / |
D.C/Case called. Complainant is present. Mr. Ramesh Kumar Learned Advocate for complainant is present. B.Ws returned executed upon all accused. All accused are present. Mr. Perma Nand Learned Advocate appeared and filed power on behalf all accused persons. All ccused furnished required surety. One Muhammad Yousif S/o Juman appeared and stood surety for accused Arab, Allah Bux, Esso, Kaleemullah & Ghulam Rahim, he produced smart card of his motorcycle along with affidavit. Order passed on it. Surety accepted. One Saleem S/o Muhammad appeared and stood surety for accused ALatif, Uris and Abdul Khalique, he produced smart card of his motorcycle along with affidavit. Order passed on it. Surety accepted. Photostat copies of documents supplied to all accused on free of cost vide receipt at Exh.01. Put off to...... 22.10.2026 for charge. Complainant and all accused are directed to attend. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | F.S. (Family Suits) 39/2026 | Mst:Mehar-Ul-Nisa D/o Sawan VS Javaid Ali S/o Allah Bachayo | Keemat Rai(ADVO-60-SBC-THP) | Family Suit-Restitution of Conjugal Rights,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Today Plaintiff namely Mst: Mehar-Ul-Nisa w/o of Javaid Ali, D/o Muhammad Sawan by caste Bajeer, Resident of village Jagari, Taluka Diplo, District Tharparkar, appeared along with her counsel Mr. Parma Nand & file this Family Suit for Restitution of Conjugal Rights, Maintenance allowance for the plaintiff and her minor daughter, and Recovery of Dowry Articles against her husband namely Javaid Ali s/o Allah Bachayo by caste Bajeer R/o village Jaghari Taluka Diplo. Heard Plaintiff and her counsel. Admit. Register, subject to legal objections if any. Issue Notice/Summons to defendant through Bailiff and Registered Post AD on cost of plaintiff. Hearing.....20-10-2026 for service. Memo of Plaint at Exh;01, along with affidavit & Vakalatnama at Exh:02, Fardee at Exh:03. Summons at Exh:04. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 2 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 1/2026 | Mst: Pathani VS Tayab | Rameesh Kumar(ADVO-54701-SBC-THR) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-THP) | Family Execution-Execution Application | Family Suit called. Plaintiff is absent. Mr. Ramesh Kumar Advocate for plaintiff is present and submitted copy of publication published in daily Pahanji News paper dated 15.10.2026 along with his statement. Statement at Exh.08, publication at Exh.08/A. Hence service upon defendant is found satisfactory and held good, such held good order passed at Exh.09. Now put off to............30.10.2026 for appearance of defendant and filing of W.S. |
|
| 3 | F.S. (Family Suits) 36/2026 | Abdullah S/o Habib Soomro VS Mst. Shazia and another | Muhammad Rafique(ADVO-91-SBC-THP) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-THP) | Family Suit-Suit for Jactitation of Marriage | Family suit called. Plaintiff is present, his counsel is absent. Process returned un-served upon defendants. Repeat process through bailiff and AD Register on cost of plaintiff. Put off to..... 23.10.2026, for service. |
|