| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | PPC 48/2026 | The State VS Bheemon Kolhi and others. | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-THP),Perma Nand(ADVO-76-SBC-THP) | Shanker Lal (ADVO-99-SBC-THP) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-Fii,PPC-337-L,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | 16/2026 Diplo |
Case called. All accused persons are present on bail. The learned ADPP for the State is absent; however, the Naib Court is present. The complainant and private P.Ws. are also present. Mr. Perma Nand, learned counsel for the complainant, and Mr. Shankar Lal Meghwar, learned counsel for the accused persons, are present. Learned counsel for the complainant has submitted an application for adjournment on the ground that he is not fully prepared to proceed with the case today. Learned counsel for the defence has raised no objection to the application. Both learned counsel have further submitted their consent that they shall proceed with the case on the next date of hearing without seeking any further adjournment. By consent of both parties, the case is adjourned to 06.11.2026 for recording of evidence. The complainant and the P.Ws. present are bound down for the next date of hearing. All accused persons are directed to remain present on the next date of hearing. |
| 2 | PPC 76/2026 | Rano Ameer Kallar VS Ashique Ali Kallar and three others. | Perma Nand(ADVO-76-SBC-THP) | Khair Muhammad (ADVO-326-SBC-BDN) | PPC-34,PPC-341,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | / |
Case/DC called. Complainant is present. All four accused are present on bail. Mr. Khair Muhammad Learned Adv for accused persons is present. Complainant and his witnesses are present. Mr. Perma Nand Learned Adv for complainant is present. Learned counsel for accused submitted application for seeking adjournment on the ground that he is not prepared today & he could not proceed case today. Order passed on it. Allowed. In view of the request, the case is adjourned to 31.10.2026 for evidence. The complainant is directed to ensure the attendance of his witnesses on the next date of hearing. All accused persons are also directed to remain in attendance. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 1 | IIIrd Class Civil Suits 11/2026 |
Bherji S/o Jaluji VS Ladhu and 11 others | IN PERSON (SELF)(ADVO-001-SBC-MKS) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-THP) | Matter called. Plaintiff is present. Defendants No. 1, 2, 3 and 6 are also present. Defendant No. 4 has expired. Process has not been effectively served upon Defendants No. 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12. Hence, fresh process be issued against the said defendants through bailiff. Mr. Pirkash Singh, Advocate, appeared and filed his Vakalatnama on behalf of the defendants present, which is taken on record as Exh. 08. Learned counsel also submitted an application seeking for time for filing the Written Statement (W.S.), which is at as Exh. 09. Put off to.....13.11.2026 for service & for filing of W.S |
||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | F.S. (Family Suits) 36/2026 | Abdullah S/o Habib Soomro VS Mst. Shazia and another | Muhammad Rafique(ADVO-91-SBC-THP) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-THP) | Family Suit-Suit for Jactitation of Marriage | Family suit called. Plaintiff alongwith his counsel is present. Process partly returned served. Defendant No.02 is present. Mr. Shankar Lal Advocate appeared & filed power on behalf of defendant N.02, at Exh.07. Issue fresh process to defendant No.01, through bailiff and AD Post Registered on cost of plaintiff. Put off to...... 13.11.2026, for service. |
|
| 2 | F.S. (Family Suits) 37/2026 | Sht: Naveeta and another VS Kapil Dev Menghwar | Perma Nand(ADVO-76-SBC-THP) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-THP) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Family suit called. Plaintiff is absent, her counsel is present. Defendant called absent. Process not returned served or un-served from family court Umerkot. Mr. Shankar Lal Advocate filed his undertaking on behalf of defendant, that plaintiff him for filing of power. Order passed on it. Keep on record. Put off to....06.11.2026, for appearance of defendant. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 3 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 1/2026 | Mst: Pathani VS Tayab | Rameesh Kumar(ADVO-54701-SBC-THR) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-THP) | Family Execution-Execution Application | Family Suit called. Plaintiff is absent. Mr. Ramesh Kumar Advocate for plaintiff is present. Defendant called absent. Now put off to......07.11.2026 for filing of W.S, as last chance. |
|
| 4 | F.S. (Family Suits) 38/2026 | Mst:Hussana VS Dost Ali Soomro | Khair Muhammad (ADVO-326-SBC-BDN) | Perma Nand(ADVO-76-SBC-THP) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family Suit called. Plaintiff is absent. Mr. Khair Muhammad learned counsel for plaintiff is present. Defendant is present. Mr. Perma Nand Learned defendant counsel is present and and filed written statement at Exh.09. Order passed on it. Copy to otherside. Plaintiff counsel is present & received copy of W.S. Put off to......05.11.2026 for filing of W.S. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 5 | F.S. (Family Suits) 14/2026 | Ravichand Menghwar VS Sht: Neelam d/o Lachman | Khair Muhammad (ADVO-326-SBC-BDN) | Shanker Lal (ADVO-99-SBC-THP) | Hindu Marriage Act 2018 -1 | Family Suit called. Plaintiff is present. Mr. Khair Muhammad learned counsel for plaintiff is present. Defendant Sht: Neelam is absent, her counsel Mr. Shanker Lal Meghwar is present and he filed Affidavit in Evidence of plaintiff Sht. Neelam at Exh.15, he also filed Affidavit in evidence of witness Lachhman at Exh.16. Put off to.....13.11.2026 for evidence of defendant side & for hearing of application regarding maintainability of Suit and absence of cause of action. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 6 | F.S. (Family Suits) 25/2026 | Mst: Salma VS Ali Ahmed Khatti | Perma Nand(ADVO-76-SBC-THP) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-THP) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Family Suit called. Plaintiff is absent, her counsel is present. Defendant is absent, his counsel is also present. Case proceeded. Arguments heard from both counsel. Learned Advocate for plaintiff filed statement along with photo stat copies of case law. Put off to..........04.11.2026 for post trial. |
|