| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | PPC 11/2026 | The State VS Ayaz alias Ayaz Ali and 03 others | Keemat Rai(ADVO-60-SBC-THP) | Khair Muhammad (ADVO-326-SBC-BDN) | PPC-337-F(vi),PPC-337-Fv,PPC-34,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | 3/2026 Diplo |
Case called. All accused are present on bail. ADPP for State is absent, but Naib Court is present. Mr. Khair Muhammad, learned counsel for accused persons is present. Mr. Keemat Rai, Learned Advocate for complainant is present. Complainant and private P.Ws are present. Complainant Ashraf and accused Ayaz jointly submitted application for adjournment of the case on the ground that compromise talks are going on between the parties. Order passed on it. Allowed in the interest of justice. Complainant &P.Ws are bound down. Put off to.......21.11.2026 for evidence. All accused are directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 2 | Other CR/Sessions Cases (If Any) 92/2026 | The State VS Mangal and another | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-THP) | Khair Muhammad (ADVO-326-SBC-BDN) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8 | 49/2026 Diplo |
Case called. Both accused are present on bail. ADPP for State is absent, but Naib Court is present. Mr. Perma Nand Learned Adv for accused persons is present. Charge framed U/S 242 Cr.P.c against accused at Exh.02, their pleas recorded at Exh.02/A & B, to which they pleaded not guilty and claimed for trial. Issue summon to all P.Ws. Call case property. Put off to.....16.11.2026 for evidence. Accused is directed to attend. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Hearing of Applications | |||||||
| 1 | IIIrd Class Civil Suits 10/2026 |
Aneel Kumar VS Ghulam Muhammad Bajeer | Keemat Rai(ADVO-60-SBC-THP) | Khair Muhammad (ADVO-326-SBC-BDN) | Matter called. Plaintiff is present, his counsel is also present. Defendant is absent, however, is counsel Mr. Khair Muhammad is present. Plaintiff counsel submitted application for adjournment on the ground that compromise talks are going on between parties. Order passed on it. Allowed. Put off to.....12.11.2026, for arguments of application U/O VII Rule 11 CPC on behalf of plaintiff, as last chance. |
||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Post-Trial | |||||||
| 1 | F.S. (Family Suits) 25/2026 | Mst: Salma VS Ali Ahmed Khatti | Perma Nand(ADVO-76-SBC-THP) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-THP) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Family Suit called. Plaintiff is absent, her counsel is present. Defendant is absent, his counsel is present. In the larger interest of larger justice suit adjourned to..........12.11.2026 for further post trial. Learned both counsel verbally submitted their consent to produce both parties. |
|