CIVIL JUDGE & JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DIPLO : 13-NOV-2026

S.NO. CASE NO NAME OF PARTIES ADVOCATES UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS FIR No. Hearing Status
Party Side 1 Party Side 2

CRIMINAL JURISDICTION

S.NO. CASE NO NAME OF PARTIES ADVOCATES UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS FIR No. Hearing Status
Party Side 1 Party Side 2
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence
1 PPC 56/2026 The State VS Khadim Hussain Lund and others.   ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-THP),Rameesh Kumar(ADVO-54701-SBC-THR),Shanker Lal (ADVO-99-SBC-THP)   Preet Pal Singh(ADVO-5076-SBC-HYD)   PPC-337-Fi,PPC-337-Fiii,PPC-34,PPC-447,PPC-504,PPC-506 33/2026
Kaloi

Case called. Accused Mumtaz Ali is absent, while co-accused are present on bail. Learned ADPP for State is absent, but Naib Court is present. Mr. Preet Pal Singh Learned Advocate for accused persons is present. Mr. Shankar Lal Meghwar Learned Adv for complainant is present. Mr.Preet Pal Singh Advocate for accused filed application for absence of accused Mumtaz Ali . Procees partly served upon Complainant and P.Ws. Complainant and P.Ws are present and bound down. Put off to 28.11.2026 for evidence. All accused persons are directed to remain present on the next date of hearing.

2 Other CR/Sessions Cases (If Any) 84/2026 The State VS Nisar and another.   ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-THP)   Khair Muhammad (ADVO-326-SBC-BDN)   Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8 38/2026
Kaloi

Case called. Both accused are present on bail. Mr. Khair Muhammad Learned Advocate for accused persons is present. I/C ADPP for State is absent, but Naib Court is present. Procees partly served upon Complainant and P.Ws. Complainant SIP Ghulam Mustafa and P.Ws Abdul Aziz and Mukhtiar Ali are present. Case proceeded Deposition of complainant SIP Ghulam Mustafa is recorded at Exh.03, he produced entry No.12 at Ech:4,memo of arrtest and recovery at Exh:5,FIR at Exh:6, entry No:13 at Exh:7, and he produced entry No:16 at Exh:08. Present P.Ws Mukhtiar Ali and Abdul Aziz are bound down. Issue process to remaining P.Ws. Case property return back. Put off to.....16.11.2026 for evidence. Both accused are directed to attend.

CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Statement of Accused
3 PPC 76/2026 Rano Ameer Kallar VS Ashique Ali Kallar and three others.   Perma Nand(ADVO-76-SBC-THP)   Khair Muhammad (ADVO-326-SBC-BDN)   PPC-34,PPC-341,PPC-504,PPC-506-B /

Case/DC called. All four accused are present on bail. Mr. Khair Muhammad Learned Adv for accused persons is present. Learned counsel for complainant is present. Put off to......16.11.2026 for statement of accused. All accused are directed to attend.

CIVIL JURISDICTION

S.NO. CASE NO NAME OF PARTIES ADVOCATES Hearing Status
Party Side 1 Party Side 2
CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service
1 IIIrd Class Civil Suits 11/2026
Bherji S/o Jaluji VS Ladhu and 11 others   IN PERSON (SELF)(ADVO-001-SBC-MKS)   ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-THP)

Matter called. Plaintiff is absent . All Defendants called absent. Mr. Perkash Singh advocate appeared and filed power/Vakalat Nama on behalf defendants No: 1 to 3 and 5 to 7, through attorney Pehlaj s/o Narsingh Bheel, at Exh:12,Mr. Perkash Singh Advocate for Attorney Pehlaj moved Written Statement at Exh: 13, on behalf of No. 1, 2, 3,5,6,7, and along with application U/O VII Rule 11 CPC at Exh: 14. Order thereon. Notice to other side. Plaintiff Bherji sent adjournment application at Exh:15 and along with statement submit the court fee stamp at Exh: 16. Process partly returned served defendants No: 5,and 07. Repeat summons defendants No:08 to 12.. Put off to....27.11.2026 for service defendants No:8 to 12

FAMILY JURISDICTION

S.NO. CASE NO NAME OF PARTIES ADVOCATES UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS Hearing Status
Party Side 1 Party Side 2
FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service
1 F.S. (Family Suits) 36/2026 Abdullah S/o Habib Soomro VS Mst. Shazia and another   Muhammad Rafique(ADVO-91-SBC-THP)   ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-THP) Family Suit-Suit for Jactitation of Marriage

Family suit called. Plaintiff alongwith his counsel is present. Process partly returned served upon defendant No.01. Both defendants are present. is present. Mr. Shankar Lal Advocate for defendant is absent. Service held good. Hence service upon defendants Mst:Shazia and Haji Muhammad Soomro are found satisfactory and held good. Such order passed at Exh:10 Now Put off to....20.11.2026, for File W.S/Objections. .

FAMILY JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A.
2 F.Ex. (Family Executions) 1/2026 Mst: Pathani VS Tayab   Rameesh Kumar(ADVO-54701-SBC-THR)   ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-THP) Family Execution-Execution Application

Family Suit called. Plaintiff is absent. Mr. Ramesh Kumar Advocate for plaintiff is present. Defendant called absent. Now put off to.......19.11.2026 for filing of W.S, as last chance.

3 F.S. (Family Suits) 40/2026 Muhammad Jumman s/o Latif ALi VS Mst:Lal Khatoon D/o Ghulam Muhammad   Keemat Rai(ADVO-60-SBC-THP)   ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-THP) Family Suit-Restitution of Conjugal Rights

Family Suit called. Plaintiff is present, her counsel Mr. Keemat Rai is present. Defendant is absent. Mr. Keemat Rai Advocate for Plaintiff filed application for withdrawal from the suit at Exh.07. Order passed at Exh.08 and announced in open Court. As per order, the instant suit is dismissed as withdrawn.

FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence
4 F.S. (Family Suits) 17/2025 Mst. Amnat Rahimoon VS Haji Muhammad Rahimoon.   Jeeloji(ADVO-107-SBC-THP)   Shankar Lal(ADVO-663-SBC-MKS) Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article

Family suit called. Plaintiff is present. Defendant is absent. Process returned served upon Mst:Amnat. Mr. Ragan Learned Advocate for plaintiff is present. Mr. Shankar Lal Suthar Adv for defendant is absent and adjournment application sent through advocate Bhomji. Order on it. Allowed. Put off to.... 19.11.2026 for evidence/further proceeding.

5 F.S. (Family Suits) 14/2026 Ravichand Menghwar VS Sht: Neelam d/o Lachman   Khair Muhammad (ADVO-326-SBC-BDN)   Shanker Lal (ADVO-99-SBC-THP) Hindu Marriage Act 2018 -1

Family Suit called. Plaintiff is present. Mr. Khair Muhammad learned counsel for plaintiff is present. Defendant Sht: Neelam is present, her counsel Mr. Shanker Lal Meghwar is present. Case proceeded. Deposition of defendant Sht:Neelam is recorded at Exh:18, he produced affidavit ???in-evidence comparing five pages at Exh:19 to Exh:23, private settlement of the Meghwar community comprising five pages at Exh:24 to Exh:28, receipt of gold ornaments at Exh:29, materials purchased from Decoration, Diplo City at Exh:30, receipts for purchasing materials for preparation of food by the mother of the defendant at Exh:31 to Exh:35, receipts for purchasing dowry articls at Exh:36 & Exh:37, and and materials purchased by the father of defendant for arranging the private settlement and serving food Exh:38 to Exh:542, and he produce private settlement and made efforts to resolve the dispute along with their decisions regarding the private settlement at Exh:43 to Exh:69. Put off to.....28.11.2026 for evidence of defendant side