| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | PPC 23/2026 | The State VS Usman and 06 others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-THP),Keemat Rai(ADVO-60-SBC-THP) | Jeeloji(ADVO-107-SBC-THP) | PPC-114,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-341,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | 12/2026 Kaloi |
Case called. All accused are present on bail. ADPP for State is absent, but Naib Court is present. Mr. Keemat Rai, learned counsel for complainant is present. Complainant is present, while P.Ws are absent. Mr. Regan Advocate for accused persons is present and submitted application for adjournment of case on the ground that compromise talks are going on between the parties & counsel for busy before Honourable Sessions Court. Order passed on it. Adjournment allowed. Put off to.....12.10.2026, for evidence. All accused are direct to attend. |
| 2 | PPC 38/2026 | The State VS Chander and five others. | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-THP),Jeeloji(ADVO-107-SBC-THP) | Keemat Rai(ADVO-60-SBC-THP) | PPC-114,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-Fi,PPC-337-L,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | 11/2026 Kaloi |
Case called. All accused are present on bail. ADPP for State is absent, but Naib Court is present. Mr. Keemat Rai, Learned counsel for accused persons is present. Complainant is present. Mr. Regan Advocate for complainant is present and submitted application for adjournment of case on the ground that compromise talks are going on between the parties & counsel for busy before Honourable Sessions Court. Order passed on it. Adjournment allowed. Put off to....12.10.2026 for evidence. All accused are directed to attend. |
| 3 | PPC 53/2026 | The State VS Usman and 05 others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-THP) | Jeeloji(ADVO-107-SBC-THP) | PPC-114,PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-337-A(ii),PPC-337-L,PPC-341,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | 24/2026 Kaloi |
Case called. All accused are present on bail. ADPP is absent, but Naib Court is present. Complainant is present .Mr. Regan learned advocate for accused persons is present & submitted application for adjournment of case on the ground that compromise talks are going on between the parties & counsel for busy before Honourable Sessions Court. Order on it. Adjournment allowed. Put off to....12.10.2026 for Evidence. All accused are directed to attend. |
| 4 | PPC 54/2026 | The State VS Muhammad Ramzan and 5 others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-THP) | Perma Nand(ADVO-76-SBC-THP) | PPC-114,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-L,PPC-34,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | 26/2026 Kaloi |
Case called. All accused are present on bail. ADPP for State is absent, but Naib Court is present. Mr. Perma Nand Adv for accused is present. Mr: Subhan ullah Samejo appeared and Filed power of behalf of complainant. Order passed on it. File. Learned counsel also submitted application U/S 493 Cr.P.C to assist the prosecution. Order passed on it. Allowed to assist the prosecution. He also submitted application for adjournment for grant of time. Order passed on it. Adjournment allowed. Complainant is present. File. Put off to....13.10.2026 for evidence. All accused are directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Misc. Applications | |||||||
| 5 | Cr.M.A. (Criminal Misc. Applications) 3/2026 | Rano and others VS Veenjho and others | Jeeloji(ADVO-107-SBC-THP) | Keemat Rai(ADVO-60-SBC-THP) | Cr.PC-133 | / |
Criminal Misc application U/S 133 Cr.P.C called. Applicants called are absent. Opponents Khatu and Danish are present. Mr. Keemat Rai, learned counsel for opponents is present. Mr. Regan Learned Advocate for applicants is present & submitted statement that undersigned withdraw from instant application. Order passed on it. In view of statement filed by counsel for applicant the he withdraw from instant application hence instant application is dismissed as withdraw. |
| 6 | PPC 48/2026 | The State VS Bheemon Kolhi and others. | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-THP),Perma Nand(ADVO-76-SBC-THP) | Shanker Lal (ADVO-99-SBC-THP) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-Fii,PPC-337-L,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | 16/2026 Diplo |
Case called. All accused are present on bail. ADPP for State is absent, but Naib Court is present. Mr. Perma Nand Advocate for complainant is present. Mr. Shankar Lal Meghwar Adv for accused persons is Absent, but his associate Mr. Ramesh Kumar is present. Case fixed for order on Application u/s 249-A Cr.P.C. Application u/s 249-A, Cr.P.C is dismissed. Complainant is present. Accused Bhoomon filed adjournment application for grant of time. Order passed on it. Allowed time granted. Put off to....02.10.2026 for evidence. All accused are directed to attend. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | F.S. (Family Suits) 31/2026 | Mst: Taja d/o Allah Bachayo VS Azam s/o Bhoro Kallar | Khair Muhammad (ADVO-326-SBC-BDN) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-THP) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Today Plaintiff namely Mst: Taja w/o Azam d/o Allah Bachayo by caste Kallar, r/o Kallar Colony Diplo Town, appeared along with her counsel Mr. Khair Muhammad, & filed this Family Suit for Dissolution of marriage by way of Khulla & Maintenance, against her husband namely Azam s/o Bhoro by caste Kallar, r/o village Manjhi Kallar near Bodar Farm, Taluka Kunri, District Umerkot.. Heard Plaintiff and her counsel. Admit. Register, subject to legal objections if any. Issue Notice/Summons to defendant through Bailiff and Registered Post AD on cost of plaintiff. Hearing ...30-09-2026 for service. Memo of Plaint at Exh;01, Vakalatnama at Exh:02, Fardee at Exh:03. Summons at Exh:04. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Hearing of Applications | |||||||
| 2 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 1/2026 | Mst: Pathani VS Tayab | Rameesh Kumar(ADVO-54701-SBC-THR) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-THP) | Family Execution-Execution Application | Today Decree holder/plaintiff namely Mst: Pathani d/o Abdul Sattar, appeared & Filed this Family Execution Application U/O 21 Rule 11 C.P.C. through her counsel Mr.Ramesh Kumar, against Judgment debtor namely Tayab s/o Shareef by caste Lund r/o village Singal Chak, Tando Bago district Badin, in Family Suit No:20/2026 (Mst:Pathani???Vs???Tayab) to return of decreetal dowry articles or pay its alternative value of Rs:100000/-(one lac) to decree holder as ordered in the decree of above family suit. The Advocate for applicant filed following documents:-Application u/o 21 rule 11 C.P.C .Photo copy of Judgment of family suit No:20/2026, and Vakalatnama . Order passed on application . Execution application Admit. Register the. Issue Notice to Judgment Debtor through AD Register Post and bailiff of this court on cost of plaintiff. Now Put off to......30.09.2026, for service . Execution Application at Ex:01. Vakalat Nama at ExL02Fardee at Ex:03. Notice at Ex:04. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 3 | F.S. (Family Suits) 11/2026 | Mst:Safia d/o Muhammad Juman VS Abdullah s/o Ali Nawaz | Jeetesh Kumar (ADVO-129-SBC-THP) | Perma Nand(ADVO-76-SBC-THP) | Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family Suit called. Plaintiff Mst: Safia is present. Defendant is present. Mr. Jatesh learned counsel for plaintiff is present. Mr. Perma Nand Learned counsel for defendant is present. Today defendant deposited maintenance amount Rs.6000/- in office, and said amount handed over to plaintiff on proper receipt. Defendant Abdullah moved application that he ready to reside his wife that his house and also he look after him at Exh:26. Order on it Keep on record. Learned plaintiff counsel submitted application for withdrawal from the instant suit at Exh.27. Order passed on separate sheet at Exh.28. In view of statement filed by learned counsel, instant suit is disposed off as withdrawn. |
|
| 4 | F.S. (Family Suits) 14/2026 | Ravichand Menghwar VS Sht: Neelam d/o Lachman | Khair Muhammad (ADVO-326-SBC-BDN) | Shanker Lal (ADVO-99-SBC-THP) | Hindu Marriage Act 2018 -1 | Family Suit called. Plaintiff is present. Mr. Khair Muhammad learned counsel for plaintiff is present. Defendant Sht: Neelam is absent, her counsel Mr. Shanker Lal Meghwar is absent. Put off to......02.10.2026 for evidence of defendant side & for hearing of application regarding maintainability of Suit and absence of cause of action. |
|
| 5 | F.S. (Family Suits) 25/2026 | Mst: Salma VS Ali Ahmed Khatti | Perma Nand(ADVO-76-SBC-THP) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-THP) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Family Suit called. Plaintiff is present. Defendant is absent. Mr. Ramesh Kumar advocate for defendant is present. Mr. Parma Nand Advocate for plaintiff is present. Put off to....25.09.2026 for evidence |
|