| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | PPC 79/2025 | The State VS Sadam Lund and others. | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-THP),Subhanallah(ADVO-55-SBC-THP) | Shankar Lal(ADVO-663-SBC-MKS) | PPC-114,PPC-337-F(vi),PPC-34,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | 40/2025 Diplo |
Case called. All accused are present on bail. I/C ADPP for state is absent, but Naib court is present. Mr. Shanker Lal learned counsel for accused persons is present. Mr. Perma Nand Learned counsel for complainant is present. Complainant Moula Bux is present. Process returned duly served upon I.O Abdul Razaque and M.O Dr. Chaman Lal, both called absent. Repeat process as before. Put off to........... 03.06.2026 for evidence. All accused are directed to attend. |
| 2 | Hd.T. (Hudood Trial) 26/2026 | The State VS Bhoopo Ji Thakur | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-THP) | Keemat Rai(ADVO-60-SBC-THP) | Prohibition (Enforcement Of Hadd) Order, 1979-3,Prohibition (Enforcement Of Hadd) Order, 1979-4 | 7/2026 Diplo |
Case called. Accused is absent. ADPP for State is absent, but Naib Court is present. Mr. Keemat Rai, Advocate is absent, but his associate Mr. Ramesh Kumar is present & submitted application for excuse the absence of accused. Order passed on it. Condoned absence. P.Ws ASI Karim Dino and PC Chandar Kumar are present and bound down. Put off to......08.06.2026 for evidence. Accused is directed to attend. |
| 3 | Other CR/Sessions Cases (If Any) 32/2026 | The State VS Ashok Kumar Bheel | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-THP) | Keemat Rai(ADVO-60-SBC-THP) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8 | 13/2026 Kaloi |
Case called. Accused is present on bail. ADPP for State is absent, but Naib Court is present. Mr. Keemat Rai, learned counsel for accused is absent. Process returned partly served. No. P.Ws are present. Intimation of all P.Ws received. Accused submitted application for adjournment. Order passed on it. Adjournment allowed. Issue fresh summon to all P.Ws. Call case property. Now Put off to???10.06.2026 for evidence. Accused is directed to attend. |
| 4 | Other CR/Sessions Cases (If Any) 31/2026 | The State VS Muzfar Kallar | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-THP) | Keemat Rai(ADVO-60-SBC-THP) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8 | 13/2026 Diplo |
Case called. Accused is present on bail. ADPP for State is absent, but Naib Court is present. Mr. Keemat Rai, Learned counsel for accused is absent. Process returned partly served. ASI Nathoo Ram, PC Manjhi & PC Chandar are present. Accused submitted application for adjournment. Order passed on it. Adjournment Allowed. Present PWs are bound down. Intimation of ASI Amanullah & SIP Sooro are received. Issue fresh summon to ASI Amanullah, SIP Sooro & remaining all P.Ws. Call case property. Now Put off to....08.06.2026 for evidence. Accused is directed to attend. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 1 | F.S. (Family Suits) 19/2026 | Haroon S/o Khamiso VS Mst:Samreen w/o Haroon | Perma Nand(ADVO-76-SBC-THP) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-THP) | Family Suit-Restitution of Conjugal Rights | Family suit called. Plaintiff is absent, his counsel is present and filed statement for withdrawal from the suit at Exh.08. Order passed on separate sheet at Exh.09. In view of statement filed by learned counsel suit is dismissed as withdrawn. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 2 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 2/2026 | Ghulam Hussain Kallar VS Mst:Bushra | Keemat Rai(ADVO-60-SBC-THP) | Perma Nand(ADVO-76-SBC-THP) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-Application U/S 7 & 10 of Guardian & Ward Act,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 (For Custody) | GA called. Applicant is present. Mr: Keemat Rai learned Advocate for applicant is Present. Opponent Mst. Bushra is absent. Mr. Perma Nand Advocate for opponent is present. Arguments heard. Judgment passed at Exh.22 and announced in open Court. As per Judgment, G.A is dismissed. |
|