| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 60/2026 | Latif and another VS The State | Perma Nand(ADVO-76-SBC-THP) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-THP) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8 | 53/2026 Kaloi |
Criminal bail application called. Mr. Perma Nand, Learned Advocate for applicant/accused is present. I/C ADPP for State is absent, but Naib Court is present. Police papers received. Arguments heard. Put off to..... 07.11.2026, for order. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 2 | PPC 37/2026 | The State VS Hyder Ali and two others. | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-THP),Javaid Akhtar(ADVO-383-SBC-MKS) | Jeeloji(ADVO-107-SBC-THP) | PPC-114,PPC-337-A(iv),PPC-337-F(vi),PPC-337-L,PPC-34,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | 9/2026 Diplo |
Case called. All accused are present on bail. ADPP for State is absent, but Naib Court is present. Mr. Javaid Akhter Learned counsel for complainant is present. Mr. Jeelo Ji Learned counsel for accused persons is present. Complainant is present. I.O/ASI Sawan Mal is absent, but his intimation is received. M.O Dr. Abu Bakar is present. Case proceeded. Deposition of M.O/Dr Abu Bakar is recorded at Exh.08, he produced OPD Slip of injured Arshad at Exh.08/A, Provisional Medical Certificate at Exh.08/B, Final Medical Certificate at Exh.08/C, CT Scan Report at Exh.08/D, CT scan film at Exh.08/E, radiologist opinion at Exh.08/F, six x-ray films at Exh.08/G to Exh.08/L. OPD slip of injured Ali Khan at Exh.08/M, original police letter for medical treatment Exh.08/N, Provisional Medical Certificate at Exh.08/O, Final Medical Certificate at Exh.08/P, Radiologist report at Exh.08/Q, two x-ray films at Exh.08/R and Exh.08/S. Put off to...19.11.2026 for evidence. Issue fresh summon to I.O/ASI Sawan Mal. All accused are directed to attend. |
| 3 | PPC 48/2026 | The State VS Bheemon Kolhi and others. | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-THP),Perma Nand(ADVO-76-SBC-THP) | Shanker Lal (ADVO-99-SBC-THP) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-Fii,PPC-337-L,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | 16/2026 Diplo |
Case called. All accused persons are present on bail. Learned ADPP for the State is absent; however, the Naib Court is present. Complainant and private P.Ws. are present. Mr. Perma Nand, learned counsel for the complainant and Mr. Shankar Lal Meghwar, learned counsel for the accused persons are present. Case proceeded. Deposition of complainant Soojo is recorded at Exh.03, he produced FIR at Exh.04. Chief examination of PW Ramchand is recorded at Exh.05, he produced memo of site inspection at Exh.06, cross of PW Ramchand is reserved. Present PWs are bound down. By consent of both parties case adjoruned to 14.11.2026 for evidence. Issue fresh summon to remaining private P.Ws. All accused persons are directed to remain present on the next date of hearing. |
| 4 | PPC 56/2026 | The State VS Khadim Hussain Lund and others. | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-THP),Rameesh Kumar(ADVO-54701-SBC-THR),Shanker Lal (ADVO-99-SBC-THP) | Preet Pal Singh(ADVO-5076-SBC-HYD) | PPC-337-Fi,PPC-337-Fiii,PPC-34,PPC-447,PPC-504,PPC-506 | 33/2026 Kaloi |
Case called. Accused Samoon is absent, while co-accused are present on bail. Learned ADPP for State is absent, but Naib Court is present. Mr. Preet Pal Singh Learned Advocate for accused persons is present. Mr. Shankar Lal Meghwar Learned Adv for complainant is present. Complainant is present, while P.Ws are absent. Learned counsel for accused submitted application for excuse the absence of accused Samo. Order passed on it. Allowed. Learned counsel for complainant submitted application for adjournment on the ground that witnesses not in attendance. Order passed on it. Allowed. Complainant is bound down. Issue fresh summon to all private P.Ws. Learned both counsel submitted their consent that they shall proceed with the case on the next date of hearing without seeking any further adjournment. By consent of both counsel the case is adjourned to 13.11.2026 for evidence. All accused persons are directed to remain present on the next date of hearing. |
| 5 | PPC 59/2026 | The State VS Hanif and others. | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-THP),Regan(ADVO-18058-SBC-KHC) | Shankar Lal(ADVO-663-SBC-MKS) | PPC-114,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-337-A(ii),PPC-337-Fiii,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | 27/2026 Diplo |
Case called. All accused are present on bail. ADPP is absent, but Naib Court is present. Mr. Shankar Lal Suthar Advocate for accused persons is present. Complainant and private P.Ws are present. Mr. Jeelo Ji Learned Advocate for complainant is present. Learned counsel for accused is submitted application for adjournment on the ground that he is not felling well today. Order passed on it. Adjournment allowed. Complainant and PWs are bound down. Learned both counsel submitted their consent that they shall proceed with the case on the next date of hearing without seeking any further adjournment. By consent of both counsel the case is adjourned to 19.11.2026 for evidence. All accused persons are directed to remain present on the next date of hearing. |
| 6 | PPC 87/2026 | The State VS Nazeer Ahmed and (6) others | Perma Nand(ADVO-76-SBC-THP) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-THP) | PPC-114,PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-A(ii),PPC-337-Fi,PPC-337-L,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | 46/2026 Diplo |
Case called. All accused are present on bail. Learned I/C ADPP is absent, but Naib Court is present. Mr. Perma Nand Learned Advocate for complainant is present. Mr. Jeelo Ji advocate for accused persons is present. Process returned duly served upon P.Ws. Complainant and P.Ws are present. Learned Adv for complainant submitted application for adjournment of the case on the ground that accused party challenged the M.C. Order passed on it. Allowed. Complainant and private P.Ws are bound down. Call case property. By consent of both counsel case adjourned to.....19.11.2026 for evidence. Both counsel verbally gave their consent to proceed the case on above date of hearing. All accused are directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Challan | |||||||
| 7 | PPC 98/2026 | The State VS Riaz alias Riaz Ali and anothers. | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-THP),Keemat Rai(ADVO-60-SBC-THP) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-THP) | PPC-324,PPC-337-H,PPC-34,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | 44/2026 Diplo |
Case called. Both accused are present on bail. Mr. Keemat Rai, Learned counsel for complainant is present. Complainant & his two witnesses are present. I/C ADPP for State is absent, but Naib Court is present. I.O/Inspector Hussain Bux Khaskheli is present. Heard and perused the available record. Order passed on separate sheet. Final challan accepted. Register the case. Photo stat copies of police papers supplied to both accused on free of cost vide receipt at Exh.01. As the alleged offence, U/S 324 PPC is exclusively triable by Court of Sessions. Let the R & Ps be sent to Honourable trial Court after completing all legal formalities. Now Put off to......16.11.2026 for Charge/further proceeding. Both accused are directed to attend before the Court of Honourable Sessions Judge Tharparkar at Mithi on above date of hearing. I.O is directed to produce police papers and case property before Honourable Sessions Court. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | F.S. (Family Suits) 37/2026 | Sht: Naveeta and another VS Kapil Dev Menghwar | Perma Nand(ADVO-76-SBC-THP) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-THP) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Family suit called. Plaintiff is absent, her counsel Mr. Perma Nand is present. Defendant called absent. Mr. Shankar Lal Meghwar Learned Advocate appeared and filed power on behalf of defendant with photo copy of CNIC of defendant at Exh.06. Hence service upon defendant is found satisfactory and held good, such order passed at Exh.07. Learned Advocate for defendant submitted application for adjournment/grant of time for filing of W.S at Exh.08. Order passed on it. Allowed. Put off to....14.11.2026, for W.S. |
|
| 2 | F.S. (Family Suits) 40/2026 | Muhammad Jumman s/o Latif ALi VS Mst:Lal Khatoon D/o Ghulam Muhammad | Keemat Rai(ADVO-60-SBC-THP) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-THP) | Family Suit-Restitution of Conjugal Rights | Family suit called. Plaintiff is absent, his counsel Mr. Keemat Rai is present. Defendant called absent. Mr. Perma Nand Learned Advocate appeared and submitted his undertaking at Exh.05, that he will file power on next date on behalf of defendant. Order passed on it. Keep on record. Hence service upon defendant is found satisfactory and held good, such order passed at Exh.06. Put off to.....13.11.2026, for W.S |
|
| 3 | F.S. (Family Suits) 43/2026 | Mst: Saforan w/o Haji d/o Muhammad Soomar VS Haji s/o Esso Lund | Keemat Rai(ADVO-60-SBC-THP) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-THP) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Family suit called. Plaintiff is absent, her counsel Mr. Keemat Rai is present. Process returned duly served upon defendant. Defendant is present. Hence service upon defendant is found satisfactory and held good such order passed at Exh.07. Defendant submitted application for grant of time for filing of W.S at Exh.08. Order passed on it. Allowed. Put off to......16.11.2026, for filing of W.S. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Pre-Trial | |||||||
| 4 | F.S. (Family Suits) 34/2026 | Mst: Rubina W/o Liaquat Ali VS Liaquat s/o Khuda Bux | Rameesh Kumar(ADVO-54701-SBC-THR) | Bhageshivery (ADVO-54935-SBC-THP) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Family Suit called. Plaintiff is absent, her counsel Mr. Ramesh Kumar is present. Defendant is absent. Mr. Javaid Akhter Learned Advocate for defendant is present. By consent of learned both counsel suit adjourned to.....12.11.2026 for Pre-trial. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 5 | F.S. (Family Suits) 17/2025 | Mst. Amnat Rahimoon VS Haji Muhammad Rahimoon. | Jeeloji(ADVO-107-SBC-THP) | Shankar Lal(ADVO-663-SBC-MKS) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family suit called. Plaintiff is absent. Defendant is present. Mr. Jeelo Ji Learned Advocate for plaintiff is present. Mr. Shankar Lal Suthar Adv for defendant is present. Defendant deposited maintenance amount Rs.2000/- in office and such receipt handed over to defendant. Issue fresh summon/notice to plaintiff and her witnesses. Both counsel verbally submitted their consent to proceed the matter on next date of hearing. By consent of both counsel suit Put off to......13.11.2026 for evidence/further proceeding. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Post-Trial | |||||||
| 6 | F.S. (Family Suits) 25/2026 | Mst: Salma VS Ali Ahmed Khatti | Perma Nand(ADVO-76-SBC-THP) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-THP) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Family Suit called. Plaintiff is absent, her counsel is present. Defendant is absent, his counsel is also present in the larger interest of larger justice suit adjourned to.....10.11.2026 for further post trial. Learned both counsel verbally submitted their consent to produce both parties. |
|