| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | PPC 43/2025 | The State VS Zahoor Ahmed and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-THP) | Pitho Mal(ADVO-86-SBC-THP),Zaheer Uddin() | PPC-34,PPC-420,PPC-506-B | 121/2024 Mithi |
Case called. Accused Zahoor Ahmed and Fayaz Hussain called absent. Mr. Noor Muhammad, learned counsel for accused Zahoor Ahmed is present and submitted application for excuse the absence of accused Zahoor Ahmed. Order passed on it . Put up before PO. Mr. Pitho Mal, learned counsel for accused Fayaz Hussain is present. The NBW issued against complainant Muhammad Ishaque received un-executed as per report of SIP Pardeep Kumar PS Mithi. Order passed on it. Report NBW, and BW issued against PWs Qasim and Ghulam Sarwar also received unexecuted as per report. Order passed thereon. Repeat BW against witnesses. The case against accused Sajjad and Ahtisham Asad is already kept on dormant vide order dated 27th August, 2025, however on 11.9.2025, accused Ahtisham Asad was appeared alongwith interim bail letter 4948 dated 11.9.2025 granted by Honorable District and Sessions Judge, Tharparkar Mithi, but he did not appear on subsequent dates and the NBW was issued against him due to dismissal/recall of his bail by the court of Honorable Additional Sessions Judge-I, Mithi vide order dated 16.9.2025 and the NBW against him received unexecuted as per report. Order passed thereon. Repeat NBW. Learned PO is on casual leave. Put off to.... 12.03.2026 for evidence and proceeding of NBW against accused Ahtisham Asad |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | IIIrd Class Civil Suits 1/2024 |
Dilawar VS Ramesh Meghwar and another | Zaheeruddin (ADVO-102-SBC-THP) | Shoukat Rai(ADVO-121-SBC-THP) | Suit called. Plaintiff Dilawar is present. Mr Noor Muhammad, learned counsel for plaintiff is present. Defendant No.01 is present, while defendant No.02 called absent. Mr. Shoukat Rai learned counsel for both defendants is present. Matter is fixed for plaintiff evidence. Plaintiff Witnesses called absent. Learned PO is on casual leave. Put off to.......12.03.2026 for evidence of plaintiff |
||