| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | PPC 43/2025 | The State VS Zahoor Ahmed and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-THP) | Pitho Mal(ADVO-86-SBC-THP),Zaheer Uddin() | PPC-34,PPC-420,PPC-506-B | 121/2024 Mithi |
Case called. Accused Zahoor Ahmed and Fayaz Hussain are present on bail. Mr. Zaheer u din, learned counsel for accused Zahoor Ahmed is present. Mr. Pitho Mal, learned counsel for accused Fayaz Hussain is present. The process viz NBW against complainant Muhammad Ishaque and BW against PWs Qasim and Ghulam Sarwar has not issued by concerned clerk. Issue NBW against complainat and also BW against PWs. The case against accused Sajjad and Ahtisham Asad is already kept on dormant vide order dated 27th August, 2025, however on 11.9.2025, accused Ahtisham Asad was appeared alongwith interim bail letter 4948 dated 11.9.2025 granted by Honorable District and Sessions Judge, Tharparkar Mithi, but he did not appear on subsequent dates and the NBW was issued against him due to dismissal/recall of his bail by the court of Honorable Additional Sessions Judge-I, Mithi vide order dated 16.9.2025 and the NBW against him received unexecuted as per report of SIP Pardeep. Order passed thereon. Repeat. Put off to.... 14.02.2026 for evidence and proceeding of NBW against accused Ahtisham Asad. Present accused are directed to attend |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Final Arguments | |||||||
| 2 | PPC 101/2025 | The State VS Umed Ali | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-THP),Roop Chand (ADVO-81-SBC-THP) | Jeeloji(ADVO-107-SBC-THP) | PPC-354,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | 85/2025 Mithi |
Case called. Accused Umed Ali is present on bail. Mr. Hasnain Hyder Shah, Learned advocate for accused is present. Learned ADPP for State is present. Complainant Mumtaz Ali is present. Mr. Roopchand, learned advocate for complainant is present. Case is fixed for further arguments. Further arguments heard from both sides. Judgment passed and announced in open Court, as per judgment accused is acquitted u/s 245(i)Cr.P.C. His bail bonds stand cancelled and surety discharged. |