| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 7/2026 | Dolo VS The State | Zaheer Uddin() | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-THP) | Hudood Ordinances-3/4 PEHO | 1/2026 JHANGRO |
Bail application called. Mr. Noor Muhammad, learned counsel for applicant/accused is present. Learned DPP for the state is present. Case papers received from SHO PS Jhangro. Arguments heard from both sides. Order passed and announced in open court, as per order bail granted to the accused in the sum of Rs:-10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with PR bond in the like amount. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 2 | PPC 102/2025 | The State VS Mumtaz Ali and another | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-THP),Munwar Ali() | Hemoon(ADVO-526-SBC-MKS),Zaheer Uddin() | PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-Fi,PPC-337-H,PPC-34,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | 69/2025 Mithi |
Case called. Accused Kamran called absent, while accused Mumtaz Ali is present on bail. Mr. Noor Muhammad, learned advocate for accused Karaman is present and submitted application for excuse the absence of accused Kamran khan. Order passed on it. Keep on record. Mr. Hemoon learned advocate for accused Mumtaz Ali is present. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Mr. Fakir Munwer sagar advocate for complainant is absent. Complainant Javed, PWs Barkat, Hamzo, Mushtaque, Asad Ali, and Allah Bux were bound down, but today complainant Javed, PWs Barkar and Mushtaque are present, while other called absent. Complainant Javed submitted application for adjournment. Order passed on it. Allowed. Present PWs are bound down. Issue summons to other private PWs. Put off to...10.02.2026 for evidence. Present accused is directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Final Arguments | |||||||
| 3 | PPC 101/2025 | The State VS Umed Ali | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-THP),Roop Chand (ADVO-81-SBC-THP) | Jeeloji(ADVO-107-SBC-THP) | PPC-354,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | 85/2025 Mithi |
Case called. Accused Umed Ali is present on bail. Mr. Hasnain Hyder Shah, Learned advocate for accused is present. Learned ADPP for State is present. Complainant Mumtaz Ali is present. Mr. Roopchand, learned advocate for complainant is present. Case is fixed for arguments. Partely arguments heard from both sides. Put off to....31.01.2026 for further arguments. Accused is directed to attend. |