| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | Forest/Wild Life Acts 105/2025 | The State VS Mukhtiar Ali & others | Jeeloji(ADVO-107-SBC-THP) | Sindh Wildlife Preservation Conservation Act-2020-21,Sindh Wildlife Preservation Conservation Act-2020-9 (1) | / |
Session case is called. All accused are present on bail. Advocate for all accused is present. Assistant conservator wildLife is present. Session case is fixed for evidence. PWs are present. Deposition of Complainant Muhammad Usman Inspector WildLife is recorded at Ex.3. Deposition of PW Khan Muhammad is recorded at Ex.4. Assistant Conservator WildLife has filed side close statement at Ex.5. Statement of accused are recorded at Ex.6 to Ex.8. Arguments heard from both sides. Case put off to.....09-02-2026, for judgment. All accused and witnesses are directed to attend the court. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Formal Cases | |||||||
| 2 | Forest/Wild Life Acts 109/2025 | The State VS Dolatram and Others | Zaheer Uddin() | Sindh Wildlife Preservation Conservation Act-2020-9 (1) | / |
Session case is called. Accused Dolat Ram, absconder accused Kapil and Niaz Ahmed are called absent. Advocate for accused Dolat Ram is present. BW issued against accused Kapeel Lohana and Niaz Ahmed is returned un-served. Assistant Conservator WildLife is present. Learned counsel for accused Dolat Ram has moved application for excuse of absence. Order passed on it. Excused fir today only with directions to the learned counsel to inform him for production of medical proof on next date of hearing. Case put off to.....09-02-2026 for further proceeding/hearing on application for bifurcation. Repeat B.W against absconder accused Kapil Lohana & Niaz Ahmed as before. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION Compliance | |||||||
| 1 | Ist Class Civil Suits 313/2024 |
Mst Malookan and others VS Manthar and others | Shankar Lal(ADVO-663-SBC-MKS) | Jeeloji(ADVO-107-SBC-THP),Yasir Arfat Junejo(ADVO-10135-SBC-KHS) | Suit is called. Special Attorney of plaintiffs is called absent while his learned counsel is present. Defendant No.4/special attorney of defendants No.1 to3, 5(a) and 6(a to f) and his learned counsel are present. Official defendants are called absent. I/C D.A is called absent. Suit is fixed for Compliance, objections on application u/o 39 rule 1 & 2 CPC and application u/o 7 rule 11 CPC. Learned counsel for private defendants has filed objections on application u/o 39 rule 1 & 2 CPC at Ex.27. Order passed on it. Copy to other side. Copy delivered to other side. Learned counsel for plaintiffs has moved application for grant of time at Ex.28. Order passed on it. Time granted being last chance. Put off to......03-02-2026 for Compliance, hearing on application u/o 39 r 1 & 2 and objection on application u/o 7 rule 11 CPC. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For ex-parte proof. | |||||||
| 2 | Ist Class Civil Suits 163/2025 |
Lal Muhammad VS Mukhtiarkar (Rev) Mithi & others | Bheru lal(ADVO-328-SBC-MKS) | Yasir Arfat Junejo(ADVO-10135-SBC-KHS) | Suit is called. Plaintiff and his learned counsel are present. Defendants are called absent, as they have already been declared exparte. DDA is called absent. Learned counsel for plaintiff has filed exparte proof at Ex.10. Order passed on it. Suit is fixed for exparte evidence. Put of to......02-02-2026 for exparte evidence. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 3 | Ist Class Civil Suits 178/2025 |
Suresh and others VS Chief Engineer Public Heath and Rural Development Department Hyderabad Region and others | Munwar Ali() | Suit called. Plaintiff No.1 is present while plaintiff No.2 to 9 is called absent. Learned counsel for plaintiffs is present. Defendants 1 to 3 & 6 are called absent. Suit is fixed for Service upon defendants No.4, 5 & 7/WS/objections by defendants No.1 to 3 & 6. The process is not returned served or un-served upon defendants No.4, 5 & 7. I/C District Attorney has filed memo of appearance on behalf of defendants No.1 to 6 at Ex.11. Order passed on it. File and also moved application for grant of time to file W.S at Ex.12. Order passed on order sheet, whereby service upon defendants No.4 and 5 is satisfactory and held good. Put off to....29-01-2025. For Service upon defendants No.7/WS/objections by defendants No.1 to 6. Issue process upon defendant No.7 on cost through bailiff as well as registered post A.D. |
|||
| 4 | C.Ex. (Civil Executions) 1/2026 |
Kewal @ Kewo and others VS Chhagan and others | Pirkash Singh(ADVO-65-SBC-THP) | Execution application is called. Attorney of applicants/Decree holders/plaintiffs and his learned counsel are present. Matter is fixed for service upon all opponents/judgment debtors/defendants. Process is returned served upon opponents/judgment debtors/defendants No.1, 3 and 4 while un-served upon opponents/judgment debtors/defendant No.2, as per endorsement o bailiff of court of learned Civil Judge & Judicial Magistrate, Nangarparkar vide letter No.33/2026 dated 16-01-2026. Process is returned duly served upon opponents/judgment debtors/defendant No.5, as per endorsement of bailiff of this court. Process is returned duly served upon opponents/judgment debtors/defendant No.6, as per endorsement of bailiff of court of learned 1-Senior Civil Judge, Hyderabad vide letter No.125/2026 dated 13-01-2026. Opponent/judgment debtor/defendant No.1 is present and has moved application for time grant to file attorney power of opponent/judgment debtor/defendant No.2 at Ex.6. Order passed on it. Time granted. Order passed on order sheet, whereby service upon opponents/judgment debtors/defendants No.1 & 3 to 6 is satisfactory and stands held good. Put off to......30-01-2026 for service upon opponents/judgment debtors/defendants No.2/objections by opponents/judgment debtors/defendants No.1 and 3 to 6. |
|||
| 5 | Ist Class Civil Suits 5/2026 |
Jeeando and others VS Lal Muhammad and others | Munwar Ali() | Suit is called. Plaintiff No.2(b)/Special Attorney of rest plaintiffs and their counsel are present. Suit is fixed for service upon all defendants. The process returned duly served upon defendants No.1, 3 and 11 to 13 and unserved upon defendants No.2, 4 to 10, as per endorsement of bailiff of this Court. The process of defendants No.14 could not returned served or unserved. The process returned duly served upon defendants No.14, as per endorsement of bailiff of court of learned 1-Senior Civil Judge, Hyderabad vide letter No.127/2026 dated 13-01-2026. Private defendants No.1, 3 and 11 to 14 are called absent. Order passed on order sheet, whereby the service of defendants No.1, 3 and 11 to 14 is found satisfactory and held good. Put off to.....05-02-2026 for service upon defendants No.2 & 4 to 10/WS by defendants No.1, 3 and 11 to 14 . Issue summons to defendants No.2 & 4 to 10 on cost. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 6 | Ist Class Civil Suits 74/2025 |
Poorio and others VS Jumoon and others | Raisingh(ADVO-614-SBC-MKS) | Subash(ADVO-498-SBC-MKS) | Suit called. Special Attorney of plaintiffs is present while his learned counsel is called absent. Defendants No.10/attorney of defendants No.1 to 9 & 1 and defendant No.11 are present alongwith their learned counsel. Official defendants are called absent. Suit is fixed for WS by official defendants No.12 to 17 /hearing on application u/o 39 rule 1 and 2 CPC. Order passed on order sheet, whereby service upon defendants No.12 to 15 was held good on 20-05-2025, defendant No.16 on 31-07-2025 and defendant No.17 on 15-07-2025. More than sufficient time has been given to them, but they have failed to file written statement. Statutory period has been lapsed. Therefore, government defendants No.12 to 17 are hereby debarred from filing written statement. Let the matter be proceeded exparte against government defendants No.12 to 17. Put off to .........02-02-2026 for compliance /hearing on application u/o 39 rule 1 and 2 CPC. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 7 | Ist Class Civil Suits 5/2024 |
Bhag Ali VS Shoukat Khan & others | Munwar Ali() | Raisingh(ADVO-614-SBC-MKS) | Suit is called. Attorney of plaintiff and his learned counsel is present. Private defendants and their learned counsel are called absent. Suit is fixed for evidence of plaintiff's side. Learned counsel for plaintiff has moved application for adjournment at Ex.39. Put off to......03-02-2026 for evidence of plaintiff's side. Attorney of plaintiff is directed to bring his witnesses. |
||
| 8 | Ist Class Civil Suits 174/2024 |
Muhammad Qasim @ Qasim VS Jatoi and others | Zaheeruddin (ADVO-102-SBC-THP) | Jeeloji(ADVO-107-SBC-THP),Mir Murtaza(ADVO-130-SBC-THP),Muhammad Rafique(ADVO-91-SBC-THP) | Suit is called. Plaintiff is called absent while his learned Counsel Mr. Noor Muhammad are present. Defendants are called absent. Learned counsels for defendants No.1 is present while learned counsel for defendant No.2 & 3 are called absent. Private defendants No.2, 3 and official defendants 4 to 8 have already been declared exparte. Suit is fixed for Evidence of plaintiff's side. Learned counsel for defendant No.1 has endorsed no objection on applications u/o 13/16 rule 1 & 2 CPC. Orders passed on separate sheets, as per order both above application allowed. Put off to...05.02.2026 for Evidence of plaintiffs side. Issued summons to official witnesses. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Hearing of Applications | |||||||
| 9 | (Civil Misc. Applications In Case) 38/2026 |
Muhammad Qasim VS Jatoi and others | Application u/o 13 rule 1 & 2 CPC is allowed. |
||||
| 10 | (Civil Misc. Applications In Case) 39/2026 |
Muhammad Qasim VS Jatoi and others | Application u/o 16 rule 1 & 2 CPC is allowed. |
||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 11 | Ist Class Civil Suits 23/2023 |
Muhammad Khan and others VS Allahdino and others | Subash(ADVO-498-SBC-MKS) | Raisingh(ADVO-614-SBC-MKS) | Suit is called. Special Attorney of plaintiffs and his learned counsel are present. Defendant No.1/Special Attorney of Defendants No.2 to 10 is present while his learned counsel is called absent. Defendant No. 11 to 14 have already been debarred. Suit is fixed for arguments. Learned counsel for defendants has sent application for adjournment through his munshi at Ex-69. Order passed on it. Detailed order passed on order sheet. Put off to......26-01-2026 for arguments. |
||