| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 1 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 205/2026 | Somji VS Sajan & others | IN PERSON (SELF)(ADVO-001-SBC-MKS) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-THP) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Criminal Misc application called. Applicant is present. Application is fixed for report. The reports were called from concerned SHO, so also Incharge District Public Complaint Redressal Cell, Tharparkar @ Mithi. The report from SHO P.S Nangarparkar is not received nor any intimation or application is received in this regard so far, hence he may be issued show cause notice while the report from Incharge District Public Complaint Redressal Cell, Tharparkar @ Mithi is received and perused. Heard applicant in person, ADPP for the State and perused the record. Since as per contents of application, there prevails apprehension of breach of peace between the parties. However, it is duty of the State to provide protection to every citizen, his family & property, in the circumstances, the SHO concerned is directed to keep peace & tranquility in the locality by restraining both the parties from any illegal act or illegally harassing each other and provide protection as per law to both the parties as and when required and either of the patty approaches to SHO/P.S. |
| 2 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 208/2026 | Sanaullah VS Nawaz Ali & others | Zaheer Uddin() | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-THP) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Criminal Misc application called. Applicant is present. Application is fixed for report. The reports were called from concerned SHO, so also Incharge District Public Complaint Redressal Cell, Tharparkar @ Mithi. The report from SHO P.S Nangarparkar is not received nor any intimation or application is received in this regard so far, hence he may be issued show cause notice while the report from Incharge District Public Complaint Redressal Cell, Tharparkar @ Mithi is received and perused. Heard the advocate for applicant while the advocate for opponent No.1 is called absent, who disappeared after filing Vakalatnama. Even any of his associates or junior is not in attendance, who have singed on the Vakalatnama. I have also heard ADPP for the State and perused the record. Since as per police report, there is dispute between both the parties over SEF School and prior to this, opponent Nawaz Ali had moved an application against present applicant and one Nisar Ahmed which is pending adjudication in the court of Civil Judge & Judicial Magistrate, Nangarparkar, whereby there is apprehension of breach of peace. However, it is duty of the State to provide protection to every citizen, his family & property, in the circumstances, the SHO concerned is directed to keep peace & tranquility in the locality by restraining both the parties from any illegal act or illegally harassing each other and provide protection as per law to both the parties as and when required and either of the patty approaches to SHO/P.S. In view of above direction, instant petition stands disposed of. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | (Civil Misc. Applications In Case) 4/2026 |
Allahdino VS Jam & others | Raisingh(ADVO-614-SBC-MKS) | DDA(ADVO-007-SBC-NIL),Subash(ADVO-498-SBC-MKS) | Civil misc: application No.04/2026 called. Applicant is called absent. Mr. Raisingh Sodho learned advocate for applicant is present. Notices returned un-served upon opponents No.02 (c). Opponents called absent. Mr. Razaullah Junejo learned advocate on behalf of opponent No.1 (a) is present & moved adjournment application. Order passed. Adjournment granted. Mr. Ugo Mal learned DDA on behalf of official opponents No.04 to 07 is present. Put off to..... 05.05.2026 for service/objection by opponents No. 01(a), 02 (a, b & d) and 03. Repeat notice against opponents/ plaintiffs / decree holders No. 02 (c) on fresh cost. |
||
| 2 | C.Rev. (Civil Revisions) 6/2026 |
Khair Muhammad VS Venjhraj & others | Shankar Lal(ADVO-97-SBC-THP) | Civil Revision Application No.06/2026 called. Special Attorney namely Shafi Muhammad is present on behalf of applicant Khair Muhammad along with his counsel Mr. Shanker Lal Meghwar. Notices returned duly served upon respondents No. 11. Notices not received duty served or un-served up remaining respondents, but respondent No.5 Jaffar and respondent No. 7 Usman voluntarily appeared in person. Mr. Ugo Mal learned DDA is present and he has filed his memo of appearance on behalf of official respondents No.09 to 12 at Ex-05. He has also moved statement that he straight away argues without filing objection on behalf of official respondents No.09 to 12 at Ex-06. Order on it. File. Put off to........ 04.05.2026 for service. Repeat notice against remaining respondents on fresh cost. |
|||