| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 1 | PPC 35/2025 | The State VS Waryal @ Laloo Dayo & another | Abdul Rehman(ADVO-167-SBC-JMS) | PPC-380,PPC-457 | 20/2025 Bhaan Saeedabad |
Case called. Accused Waryal @ Laloo and Fahad are already declared as P.O. ADPP Present. Report about proclamation U/S 88 received from SHO P.S Bhan through HC Bashir Ahmed. Statement of Hc Bashir Ahmed recorded at Ex No.14, he produced proclamation U/S 88 Cr.P.C, report of SHO P.S Bhan and report of Mukhtiarkar Sehwan at Ex No.14/A to 14/C. Order passed on it. Heard and perused the record. Order prepared and announced in Open Court, Case against the absconder accused persons Waryal @ Laloo and Fahad be kept on dormant file, till their arrest or production before the court of Law. |
|
| 2 | Special Laws 27/2026 | The State VS Javed Ali Chandio & another | Wali Muhammad(ADVO-511-SBC-DDU) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8 | 11/2026 Sehwan |
Case called. Accused Javed Ali is present on bail. While accused Shabir Ahmed is declared as proclaimed offender. Report about proclamation U/S 88 Cr.P.C received from SHO P.S Sehwan through PC Javed Panhwar. Statement of PC Javed Pahnwar recorded at Ex No.03, he produced proclamation U/S 88 Cr.P.C and report of SHO P.S Sehwan at Ex No.03/A and 03/B. Order passed on it. Report not received from Mukhtiarkar Sehwan. ADPP and DC are present. Case papers supplied to the accused, such receipt obtained from him at Ex No.04. Case put off to 18.09.2026 for Charge. Present accused is directed to attend. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | F.S. (Family Suits) 35/2026 | Mst. Nosheen Mallah VS Nawaz Muhammad Mallah | Sher Ali(ADVO-101-SBC-JMS) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Matter called. Plaintiff Mst. Nosheen Mallah called absent her counsel Mr. Sher Ali Otho present. Defendant Nawaz Muhammad Mallah not yet been served. Matter put off to 18.09.2026 for service. Repeat process against defendant through all modes of services. |
||
| 2 | F.S. (Family Suits) 23/2026 | Mst. Ameeran Dal VS Zaheem Ali Bhand | Sher Ali(ADVO-101-SBC-JMS) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Matter called. Plaintiff Mst. Ameeran Dal called absent, her counsel Mr. Sher Ali Otho present and submitted statement along with copy of newspaper Daily Awami Awaz dated 11.09.2026. Order passed on it. Defendant Zaheem Ali Bhand called absent. Matter put off to 18.09.2026 for service. Repeat process against defendant through concerned court. |
||
| 3 | F.S. (Family Suits) 71/2026 | Mst. Shazia @ Shazi Rind VS Meer Gul Rind | Zahid Hussain(ADVO-144-SBC-JMS) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Matter called. Plaintiff Mst. Shazia @ Shazi Rind called absent, her counsel Mr. Zahid Hussain Buriro present. Defendant Meer Gul Rind not yet served. Advocate for plaintiff requested that defendant deliberately avoided from service and requested that defendant may be served through publication. Request allowed. Let the defendant be served through Publication meanwhile, repeat notice against defendant through bailiff with directions in case of non-service copy of summon be affixed on outer door of defendant. Matter put off to 19.09.2026 for service. Repeat process against the defendant through registered Post AD. |
||
| 4 | F.S. (Family Suits) 75/2026 | Mst. Anam @ Safoora Solangi VS Aijaz Ahmed Mallah & another | Muneer Ahmed(ADVO-105-SBC-JMS) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Matter called. Plaintiff Mst. Anam @ Safoora Solangi present her counsel called absent. Defendant Aijaz Ahmed Mallah not yet served. Matter put off to 18.09.2026 for service. Repeat process against defendant through all modes of service. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 5 | F.S. (Family Suits) 36/2026 | Mst. Farzana Mallah VS Sadoro Khan @ Sajjad Mallah | Nadeem Ahmed (ADVO-229-SBC-JMS) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Matter called. Plaintiff Mst. Farzana Mallah and her counsel Mr. Nadeem Ahmed Lakho are present. Defendant Sadoro Khan called absent, his counsel Mr. Salman Solangi present. Today is fixed for W.S of defendant, but defendant remained absent. Perused case dairies which reveals that on 18.07.2026 defendant was appeared through his Counsel and copy of plaint supplied to him for W.S, but till to date defendant failed to submit W.S, therefore defendant Sadoro Khan @ Sajjad Mallah is declared debarred from filing of W.S and matter is fixed for evidence on 15.09.2026. |
||
| 6 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 6/2026 | Mst. Shahar Bano Qureshi VS Muhammad Farooque Khaskheli | Sher Ali(ADVO-101-SBC-JMS) | Family Execution-Execution Application | Matter called. Decree Holder Mst. Shahar Banu called absent her counsel Mr. Sher Ali Otho present. Today matter is fixed for objections but J/D Muhammad Farooque Khaskheli could not appeared, as the publication was made in daily newspaper Awami Awaz dated 26.07.2026, since matter is fixed for appearance and objections of J/D but till to date he could not appeared nor sent any objections, therefore J/D is debarred from filing of objections and matter is fixed on 18.09.2026 for arguments. |
||
| 7 | F.S. (Family Suits) 46/2026 | Mst. Saima Otho VS Ghulam Shabir Otho | Sher Ali(ADVO-101-SBC-JMS) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Matter called. Plaintiff Mst. Saima called absent, her counsel Mr. Sher Ali Otho present. Defendant Ghulam Shabir Otho and his counsel Mr. Ayaz Ali Solangi are present and submitted W.S. Order passed on it. Copy supply to other side. Matter put off to 23.09.2026 for Pre-trial talks. |
||
| 8 | F.S. (Family Suits) 59/2026 | Mst. Aliya Brehmani VS Nadir Brehmani | Abdul Rehman(ADVO-167-SBC-JMS) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Matter called. Plaintiff Mst. Aliya called absent her counsel Mr. Salman Solangi present. Defendant Nadir Brehmani not appeared. Matter put off to 18.09.2026 for W.S/Appearance of defendant. |
||
| 9 | F.S. (Family Suits) 69/2026 | Mst. Zainab Mallah VS Younis Mallah | Abida Parveen Mallah(ADVO-275-SBC-JMS) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Matter called. Plaintiff Mst. Zainab called absent her counsel Miss. Abida Parveen Mallah also called absent. Defendant Younis Mallah not appeared. Matter put off to 18.09.2026 for appearance of defendant. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 10 | F.S. (Family Suits) 43/2025 | Mst: Rubina Rodnani VS Akram Rodnani | Sher Ali(ADVO-101-SBC-JMS) | Family Suit-Recovery of Medical Charges / Delivery Expenses ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Matter called. Plaintiff Mst: Rubina Rodnani called absent, her counsel Mr. Sher Ali also called absent. Defendant Akram Rodnani and his counsel Mr. Shakeel Ahmed Shahani called absent. In the interest of justice, matter put off to 19.09.2026 for Re-Arguments. |
||
| 11 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 7/2025 | Muhammad Ashraf Chandio VS Mst: Saima Chandio | Abdul Rehman(ADVO-167-SBC-JMS) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-Application U/S 7 & 10 of Guardian & Ward Act,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 12,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 (For Custody) | Matter called. Applicant Muhammad Ashraf and his counsel Mr. Abdul Rehman Mallah called absent. Opponent Mst: Saima Chandio and her counsel Mr. Zahid Hussain Buriro called absent. In the interest of justice, matter put off to 19.09.2026 for Arguments. |
||
| 12 | F.S. (Family Suits) 50/2025 | Akram Rodnani VS Mst: Rubina Rodnni | Shakeel Ahmed(ADVO-427LC-SBC-JMS) | Family Suit-Restitution of Conjugal Rights | Matter called. Plaintiff Akram and his counsel Mr. Shakeel Ahmed Shahani called absent. Defendant Mst. Rubeena Rodnani and her counsel Mr. Sher Ali Otho called absent. In the interest of justice, matter put off to 19.09.2026 for arguments. |
||