| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | DC (Direct Complaint) 14/2025 | Abdul Karim VS Ali Gohar & others | Insaf Ali(ADVO-949-SBC-DDU) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | / |
Crl. Direct complaint called. All Accused are present in court on bail, their counsel Mr. Muhammad Azam Sohu present. Complainant Abdul Karim present, his witness Rashid Ali is present. Counsel for complainant present. Cross examination of complainant recorded and evidence of witness Rashid recorded at Ex.04. Counsel for complainant filed side close statement at Ex.05. Put off to 26.3-2026 for statement of accused. Present accused are directed to attend. |
|
| 2 | PPC 69/2025 | The State VS Qadir Bux and others | Zulfiqar Ali(ADVO-375-SBC-DDU) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-Fi,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | 21/2025 Shah Panjo |
Case called. Accused Qadir Bux is present on bail. Accused Qalandar Bux and Abdul Qayoom are called absent. Accused Qadir Bux submitted application on their behalf, order passed on it; Excused. ADPP and Counsel for accused Mr Shahzado Sodhar present. While accused Munir, Farooque and Qadeer are declared proclaimed offenders. Summons issued to the P.Ws returned un-served, same extended. Put off to 28.3.2026 for evidence. Present accused are directed to attend. |
|
| 3 | PPC 70/2025 | The State VS Farooque Lakhair and others | Zulfiqar Ali(ADVO-375-SBC-DDU) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-337-Fi,PPC-452,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | 22/2025 Shah Panjo |
Case called. Accused Qadir Bux is present on bail. Accused Qalandar Bux and Abdul Qayoom are called absent. Accused Qadir Bux submitted application on their behalf, order passed on it; Excused. ADPP and Counsel for accused Mr Shahzado Sodhar present. While accused Munir, Farooque and Qadeer are declared proclaimed offenders. Summons issued to the P.Ws returned un-served, same extended. Put off to 28.3.2026 for evidence. Present accused are directed to attend. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 1 | IIIrd Class Civil Suits 33/2025 |
Rasool Bux VS Mst Yasmin and others | Saeed Ahmed(ADVO-520-SBC-DDU) | Suit called. Plaintiff and his counsel are present. Defendant No.02 Abdul Wahab the attorney of remaining defendants is appeared. Mr Zulifquar Ali Shaikh advocate for defendants appeared. Counsel for plaintiff filed objections on application u/o 7 R 11 CPC, copy supplied to others. Put off to 17.03.2026 for framing of issue and objection on application U/O VII Rule 11 C.P.C R/W section 151 C.P.C. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 2 | IInd Class Civil Suits 4/2025 |
Hafiz Nisar Ahmed VS Zainul Abdin & others | Saddam Hussain(ADVO-637-SBC-DDU) | Civil Suit called. Plaintiff is present, his counsel Mr. Riaz Mahesar present. Defendants No. 01 & 03 namely Zainul Abdin and Altaf already debarred from filing W.S and declared ex-parte. Defendant No.02 and his counsel Mr. Sher Ali Chandio are called absent. Counsel for plaintiff filed application u/o 16 Rule 1-2 CPC, order passed on it; Notice to other side. copy supplied. Put off to 17.3.2026 for cross examination of plaintiff. |
|||
| 3 | IInd Class Civil Suits 19/2025 |
Ameer Ali VS Ajeeb Lashari | Insaf Ali(ADVO-949-SBC-DDU) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | Civil Suit called. Plaintiff along-side his counsel is called present. Defendant is present, his counsel called absent. Learned counsel for plaintiff file an adjournment application. Order on it. Granted. Adjourned to 13.03.2026 for objection on application U/O 7 rule 11 CPC and evidence. |
||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 1 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 1/2026 | Muhammad Anwar VS Mst Mahi | Liaquat Ali(ADVO-434-SBC-DDU) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 (For Custody) | ||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 2 | F.S. (Family Suits) 33/2026 | Mst Tahmeena VS Ghualm Rasool | Jawaid Ali(ADVO-747-SBC-DDU) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Family Suit called. Plaintiff is present, her counsel is called absent. Defendant has appeared in response to summon. Mr Hamid Ali Chandio advocate files Vakalatnama on behalf of defendant and prays for time to file written statement. Time granted. Service upon defendant is held good. Order passed on order sheet. Matter adjourned to 17.3.2026 for W/S. |
||
| 3 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 12/2026 | Mst Tahmeena VS Ghulam Rasool and another | Jawaid Ali(ADVO-747-SBC-DDU) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-Application U/S 7 & 10 of Guardian & Ward Act | G&W application called. applicant is present, her counsel is called absent. Both the opponents have appeared in response to notice. MrHamid Ali Chandio advocate files Vakalatnama on behalf of opponents and prays for time to file objection. Time granted. Service upon opponents is held good. Order passed on order sheet. Matter adjourned to 17.3.2026 for objections. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 4 | F.S. (Family Suits) 16/2026 | mst Farhana VS Asqdullah | Asadullah (ADVO-759-SBC-DDU) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Suit called. Plaintiff and her counsel are present. Defendant called absent, his counsel Mr Ghulam Mujataba Malik advocate for defendant present. In the interest of justice suit adjourned. to 11.03.206 for W.S and objection on application u/s 17 A West Pakistan Family Court Act 1964. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 5 | F.S. (Family Suits) 227/2025 | Mst Sameena VS Gul Bahar & others | Peer Bux(ADVO-440-SBC-DDU) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | |||
| 6 | F.S. (Family Suits) 277/2025 | Mst Saima VS Abdul Rehman Solangi | Sher Ali (ADVO-671-SBC-DDU) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | |||
| 7 | F.S. (Family Suits) 279/2025 | Mst Abida VS Sajjad Ahmed Mirani | Abdul Waheed(ADVO-947-SBC-DDU) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | |||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Meeting | |||||||
| 8 | G.W. (G&W Cases) 24/2023 | Irshad Ali VS Mst; Zaibul Nisa & Others | Imtiaz Ali(ADVO-2765-SBC-HYD) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-Application U/S 7 & 10 of Guardian & Ward Act,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 (For Custody) | ||
| 9 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 19/2025 | Ali Asghar VS Mst Moomal@ Hooran | Zulfiqar Ali Shaikh(ADVO-151-SBC-DDU) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 of Guardian and Wards Act R/W 100 Cr.PC,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 7 | |||
| 10 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 41/2025 | Abdul Rasheed VS Mst Nadia | Saddam Hussain(ADVO-637-SBC-DDU) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 10,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 (For Custody) | ||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Compliance | |||||||
| 11 | F.S. (Family Suits) 86/2024 | Mst:Hooran VS Asghar Ali Bhutto | Saddam Hussain(ADVO-637-SBC-DDU) | Zulfiqar Ali Shaikh(ADVO-151-SBC-DDU) | Family Suit-Recovery of Medical Charges / Delivery Expenses ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | ||
| 12 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 56/2025 | Mst ARzo VS Shahzad Ali | Mushtaque Ali(ADVO-280-SBC-DDU) | Family Execution-Execution Application | Family Execution Application called. Applicant and her counsel are called absent. The attorney of J.D is also called absent, which to without any intimation. File shows vide order dated: 17.02.2026 with mutual consent of both parties the execution application was allowed and the attorney of J. Debtor agree to pay decretal amount into instalments i.e in the month of March and April-2026 along with Rs.40000/- regular maintenance but for no sound reasons the attorney of J.D has not complied the orders and uses the law as a tool. In circumstances, the decree holder has filed and application for issuing warrant of arrest against attorney of J.D. late the show-cause notice be issued against attorney of J.D to the tune that why a warrant of arrest should not be issued against him. Put off to 10.03.2026 for appearance of attorney of J.D and reply of Show-cause notice. |
||
| 13 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 60/2025 | Mst Raheema VS Shoukat Ali | Muhammad Saleem Thebo(ADVO-819-SBC-DDU) | Family Execution-Execution Application | |||