| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Hearing | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 29/2026 | Murtaza Rind VS The state | Sher Ali (ADVO-671-SBC-DDU),Zulfiqar Ali(ADVO-375-SBC-DDU) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-506-B | / |
Criminal Bail Application called. Counsel for applicant/accused is present. ADPP for the State is present. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open Court. Bail granted to the applicant/accused, subject to furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs.20,000/- to satisfaction of this Court. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 2 | PPC 24/2026 | The State VS Meer Darya Khan | Zulfiqar Ali(ADVO-375-SBC-DDU) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(ii) | 7/2026 Shah Panjo |
Criminal case called. Accused Mir Darya Khan is produced from District jail Dadu. ADPP for the State present, counsel for accused is present. I.O called present, his evidence recorded at Ex.05. ADPP filed side close statement at Ex.06. Statement of accused recorded at Ex.07. Arguments heard. Judgment passed and announced in open court. Accused acquitted u/s 245(i) Cr.P.C. Let the release letter be issued to the concerned jail. |
|
| 3 | PPC 41/2026 | The State VS Shah Ali Khoso and others | Zulfiqar Ali(ADVO-375-SBC-DDU) | PPC-215,PPC-382 | 38/2026 Faridabad |
Crl. Case called. Accused Shah Ali, Barkat, Ali Hassan and Abdul Sattar are present on bail. ADPP for the State and counsel for accused Ali Hassan are present. Complainant and his counsel are present and filed application for adjournment, which is granted. Put off to 12.10.2026 for evidence. Accused are directed to attend. Complainant to bring his witnesses. |
|
| 4 | PPC 54/2026 | The State VS Musheer Ahmed | Zulfiqar Ali(ADVO-375-SBC-DDU) | Imran Haider(ADVO-969-SBC-DDU) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 24/2026 Shah Panjo |
Case called. Accused Musheer Ahmed is present on bail. The learned ADPP for the state present. The learned counsel for accused is present. Complainant present. P.Ws are called absent. Summons to remaining P.Ws extended. Put off to 07.10.2026 for evidence. Present accused is directed to attend. |
| 5 | PPC 65/2026 | The state VS Ghulam Ali handio and others | Zulfiqar Ali(ADVO-375-SBC-DDU) | Imran Haider(ADVO-969-SBC-DDU) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-452 | 51/2026 Faridabad |
Criminal case called. Accused Ghulam Ali, Imam Ali and Mir Khan are present on bail. Accused Ghulam Shabir called absent, accused Ghulam Ali filed application for excusing his absence, order passed on it; Excused. Learned ADPP for the State and counsel for the accused are preent. No P.W is present. Summons issued to complainant and P.Ws has been returned un-served, same is extended. Put off to 05.10.2026 for evidence. Accused are directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 6 | DC (Direct Complaint) 19/2025 | Imdad Ali Bughio VS Faqeer Muhammad and others | Abdul Rasheed(ADVO-501-SBC-DDU) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-Fi,PPC-504 | / |
Criminal direct complaint called. Complainant alongside his counsel is present. Accused Faqeer Muhammad, Farooque Ali, Ashaz and Ameen are present on bail. Counsel for accused is present. Accused Nek Muhammad is declared P.O. Amended charge framed upon the accused at Ex.07, they pleaded not guilty and claimed trial, their pleas recorded at Ex.07/A to 07/D. Put off to 15.10.2026 for evidence. Accused are directed to attend. Complainant to bring his witnesses. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For U/S 87 Cr. P.C | |||||||
| 7 | PPC 93/2026 | The state VS Ihsan Malalh and others | Zulfiqar Ali(ADVO-375-SBC-DDU) | PPC-379 | 59/2026 Faridabad |
Criminal case called. Accused Ihsan, Shahmir and Muharam are shown absconders in charge sheet. Proceedings u/s 87 & 88 Cr.P.C initiated against the accused not returned, call the same. Put off to 08.10.2026 for proceedings u/s 87 & 88 Cr.P.C. |
|
| 8 | PPC 89/2026 | The state VS Amjad Ali Khoso and others | Zulfiqar Ali(ADVO-375-SBC-DDU) | Mansoor Ahmed (ADVO-673-SBC-DDU) | PPC-392 | 32/2026 Shah Panjo |
Criminal case called. Accused Amjad is present and bail. Accused Muhammad Hassan shown absconder in charge sheet. Proceedings u/s 87 & 88 Cr.P.C issued against him. Proclamation u/s 87 Cr.P.C returned by process, order passed on report his statement be recorded. Statement recorded at Ex.02, he produced proclamation u/s 87 Cr.P.C, Ishtihar, mashirnama and his endorsement at Ex.02/A to 02/D. Order passed on it; Accused is declared proclaimed offender. Report of attachment u/s 88 Cr.P.C, not received from Mukhtiarkar, call the same. Put off to 07.10.2026 for proceedings u/s 88 Cr.P.C. Crl. Direct Complaint No. /2026 Abdul Hameed Vs Muhammad Aslam & others 18.9.2026 Direct complaint called. Complainant alongside his counsel called present. P.Judge is on casual leave. Put off to 05.10.2026 for statement of complainant u/s 200 Cr.P.C. Judge |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | IInd Class Civil Suits 5/2025 |
Hafiz Madad Ali VS Maqbool Ahmed | Fayaz Ahmed(ADVO-1013-SBC-DDU) | Civil suit called. Both parties and their counsels called absent. In the interest of justice suit adjourned to 16.10.2026 for evidence/cross of plaintiff side. |
|||
| 2 | IInd Class Civil Suits 4/2026 |
Lal Chand VS Muhammad Usman Janwari | Hamid Ali Chandio(ADVO-333-SBC-DDU) | Civil suit called. Both parties alongside their counsels called absent. File shows that since last 5 dates of hearing the matter is being fixed on same stage. However in the interest of justice once more the suit is adjourned to 16.10.2026 for compliance of order 13 & 16 rule 1-2 CPC regarding list of witnesses and documents and evidence of plaintiff side. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 3 | C. Misc. Appl. (Civil Misc. Applications) 12/2026 |
Mst Hina VS Ahmed Ali | Application was disposed of on 21.9.2026. |
||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| 1 | F.S. (Family Suits) 151/2026 | Mst Bakhtawar VS Abdul Waheed | Mohammad Ali (ADVO-675-SBC-DDU) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Family suit called. Plaintiff is present alongside her learned counsel. The process issued to defendant returned by the bailiff duly served through phone call, order passed; service held good. Put off to 17.10.2026 for appearance/WS. |
||
| 2 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 28/2026 | Mst Hina VS Ahmed Ali Brohi | Saba (ADVO-1044-SBC-DDU) | Family Execution-Execution Application | Family execution application called. Applicant alongside her counsel called present. Notice issued to opponent returned by the bailiff with endorsement that he informed him through phone call, while delivery report of UMS not received. Applicant is required to submit UMS delivery report. Put of to 12.10.2026 for return of process/delivery report and order on service through phone call. |
||
| 3 | F.S. (Family Suits) 204/2026 | Baby Zahra through next friend Mst Banazir VS Amanullah Channo | Muhammad Azam(ADVO-679-SBC-DDU) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Family suit called. Next friend of plaintiffs is present, her counsel called absent. One Abdullah the attorney of defendant appeared and filed application for time to engage advocate to file WS which is granted. Put off to 10.10.2026 for WS. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 4 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 29/2026 | Mst Aneela VS Ghulam Muataza | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | Family Execution-Execution Application | Family execution application called. Applicant alongside her learned counsel is called present. Opponent is present. Parties state that they have amicably settled the dispute and filed such joint application, order passed; instant execution application disposed of amicably. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Issues | |||||||
| 5 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 35/2026 | Saleem Khan VS Mst Zeenat | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 10,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 of Guardian and Wards Act R/W 100 Cr.PC,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 7 | Guardian & Wards application is called. Applicant alongside his learned counsel is called present. Opponent and her learned counsel are present. The family suit is also pending between the spouses, wherein application u/s 17-A has been filed, hence this matter is also adjourned. Put off to 20.10.2026 for framing of issues. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 6 | F.S. (Family Suits) 65/2026 | Mst Zeenat VS Saleem Khan | Sher Ali (ADVO-671-SBC-DDU) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Family suit called. Both parties and their counsels are called present. Counsel for plaintiff filed application u/s 17-A of Family Court Act, order passed on it; Notice to other side. Copy supplied. Put off to 20.10.2026 for objections on application u/s 17-A of Family Court Act, and evidence of plaintiff side. |
||
| 7 | F.S. (Family Suits) 119/2026 | Mst Saeeda VS Rashid ALi | Abdul Rasheed(ADVO-501-SBC-DDU) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family suit called. Both parties and their counsels are called present. Cross examination of plaintiff and her witness Mst. Bashiran is recorded. Counsel for plaintiff filed side close statement at Ex.16. Put off to 15.10.2026 for objections on application u/s 17-A of Family Court Act, and evidence of plaintiff side. |
||
| 8 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 34/2026 | Amanullah VS Mst Banazir | Aftab Ahmed(ADVO-948-SBC-DDU) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 12,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 (For Custody) | G & W application called. Applicant called absent, his counsel is present and filed original power of attorney executed by applicant in favour of one Abdullah through statement, which is taken on record. Opponent is present, her counsel called absent. Attorney Abdullah is present and filed application for adjournment, which is granted. Put off to 10.10.2026 for evidence of applicant side. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 9 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 20/2026 | Mst Gudi VS Abdul Ghaffar | Abdul Basat (ADVO-737-SBC-DDU) | Family Execution-Execution Application | Family execution applicant called. Applicant/D.H and her learned counsel are called present. Opponent/J.D is exparte. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open Court; instant Execution Application is allowed. |
||
| 10 | F.S. (Family Suits) 171/2026 | Mst Maira VS Tarique Chandio | Aijaz Ali(ADVO-592-SBC-DDU) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family suit called. Plaintiff alongside her counsel is present. Defendant is exparte. Arguments heard. Judgment passed and announced in open Court; suit decreed exparte. Let the decree be framed accordingly. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Compliance | |||||||
| 11 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 19/2023 | Mst; Aisha Bughio VS Hashmat Ali Bughio | Abdul Ghani(ADVO-712-SBC-DDU) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | Family Execution-Execution Application | ||
| 12 | F.S. (Family Suits) 240/2024 | Mst Salma Jokhio VS Naseer Ahmed Jokhio | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Family Suit-Recovery of Medical Charges / Delivery Expenses ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | |||
| 13 | F.S. (Family Suits) 222/2025 | Mst Meharunisa VS Waseem Ali | Abid Ali(ADVO-320-SBC-DDU) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | |||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Exparte Evidence | |||||||
| 14 | F.S. (Family Suits) 189/2026 | Mst Kiran Wadho VS Ashraf Ali Kandhro | Mansoor Ahmed (ADVO-673-SBC-DDU) | Family Suit-Recovery of Medical Charges / Delivery Expenses ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Family suit is called. Plaintiff called absent, her learned counsel is present. Defendant already declared as ex-parte. Counsel for plaintiff filed application for adjournment, which is granted. Put off to 07.10.2026 for exparte evidence. |
||