| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | PPC 24/2025 | The State VS Ghulam Rasool @ Dingo & others | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | PPC-380,PPC-457 | 1/2025 Faridabad |
Criminal case called. Accused Ghulam Rasool, Talib and Akhtar are present on bail. Accused Hakim declared P.O. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Counsels for the accused persons are present. I.O is present, his evidence recorded at Ex. ADPP filed side close statement at Ex. Put off to 31.8.2026 for statement of accused. Present accused are directed to attend. |
|
| 2 | Gambling Act 29/2026 | The state VS Zulifquar Ali and others | Zulfiqar Ali(ADVO-375-SBC-DDU) | Muhammad Azam(ADVO-679-SBC-DDU) | Gambling Act -Section 5-A | 19/2026 Faridabad |
Case called. Accused Zulifquar Ali and Sheeraz Bughio are present on bail. Learned counsel Mr Muhammad Azam Khaskheli for accused Zulfiquar is present. While Accused Hanif is absconder and declared proclaimed offender. Learned ADPP for the State is present. Complainant and PWs called absent. Issue summon against them. Put off to 04.9.2026 for evidence. Present accused are directed to attend. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | IIIrd Class Civil Suits 15/2026 |
Hussain Bux VS Khushhali Microfinance Bank Mehar and others | Sher Ali (ADVO-671-SBC-DDU) | Civil suit called. Plaintiff alongside his counsel called present. Notice issued against defendant returned served. Defendant is present and filed application for adjournment, which is granted. Copy supplied. Put off to 11.9.2026 for evidence. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 2 | IInd Class Civil Suits 22/2025 |
Ayaz and another VS Muhammad Saleem and others | Hamid Ali Chandio(ADVO-333-SBC-DDU) | Civil suit called. Plaintiff called absent, whereas his counsel is present. Defendant No.01 who is attorney rest defendants is present alongside his counsel. Copy of objections on application U/O VII Rule II CPC supplied to counsel for defendant. Put off to 04.9.2026 for arguments on application u/o VII Rule 11 CPC and evidence of plaintiff side. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Hearing of Applications | |||||||
| 3 | IInd Class Civil Suits 5/2025 |
Hafiz Madad Ali VS Maqbool Ahmed | Fayaz Ahmed(ADVO-1013-SBC-DDU) | Civil suit called. Plaintiff alongside his counsel Mr. Fayaz Khaskheli called present. Defendant is absent, whereas, his counsel is present. The application u/o 7 Rule 11 CPC was decided vide order dated 30.6.2026 and inadvertently it was mentioned in diary for orders. Learned counsel for plaintiff files adjournment application, order passed on it; Granted. Put off to 17.9.2026 for evidence/cross of plaintiff side. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 4 | IInd Class Civil Suits 17/2025 |
Ahmed Ali Lashari VS Ali Gohr | Aamir Muneer(ADVO-25066-SBC-KHS) | Civil suit called. Plaintiff alongside his counsel is present. Defendant is present, whereas his counsel called absent. Counsel for plaintiff advanced his arguments. Defendant filed application for adjournment, which is granted. Put off to 03.9.2026 for arguments of counsel for defendant. |
|||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | F.S. (Family Suits) 121/2026 | Mst Reema VS Hubdar Lashari | Saddam Hussain(ADVO-637-SBC-DDU) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Family suit called. Plaintiff called absent, whereas her learned counsel is called present. Defendant yet not be served. Notice to defendant issued and sent to Honorable D & Sessions Judge Larkana for favour of service which has yet not been returned served or un-served. Plaintiff is directed to provide active cell number of defendant as last chance. Repeat notice against the defendant and sent the same to concerned Court through UMS/TCS. Put off to 31.8.2026 for service. |
||
| 2 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 24/2026 | Mst Zaniab VS Waheed Channa | Misri Khan(ADVO-460-SBC-DDU) | Family Execution-Execution Application | Family execution application called. Applicant/D.H called absent, whereas her learned counsel is called present. Opponent/J.D not yet served. Notice not issued due to non payment of process fee. Counsel for applicant filed condonation application, which is granted. Repeat notice to opponent/J.D through concerned family court via TCS. Put off to 04.9.2026 for service. |
||
| 3 | F.S. (Family Suits) 144/2026 | Mst Sheeza VS Arslan Ahmed Panhwar | Insaf Ali(ADVO-949-SBC-DDU) | Family Suit-Dissolution of Marriage on the option of puberty | Family suit called. Plaintiff alongside her counsel is called present. Summon issued against defendant returned by the bailiff duly served through whatsapp, order passed; service held good. Put off to 05.9.2026 for apperance/WS. |
||
| 4 | F.S. (Family Suits) 154/2026 | Mst Muskan VS Ameer Ali | Abdul Rasheed(ADVO-501-SBC-DDU) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Family suit called. Plaintiff alongside her learned counsel called present. Notice issued against defendant returned served. Defendant appeared and filed application for time to file WS, which is granted. Copy supplied to him. Put of to 02.9.2026 for WS. |
||
| 5 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 33/2026 | Mst Nazeeran VS The Public at large and others | Muhammad Azam(ADVO-679-SBC-DDU) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-Application U/S 7 & 10 of Guardian & Ward Act,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 10 | Guardian application is called. Applicant alongside her counsel called present. The opponents No.01 to 04, so also minors Baby Maryam and Ali Rayan are present. Counsel for applicant filed application u/o 32 R 3 G & W Act r/w Sec 151 CPC, for appointing opponent No.01 as guardian adlitem at Ex.03, order passed on it; Notice to proposed guardian. Opponent No.01 filed affidavit cum-no objection at Ex.04. Order passed at Ex.05; application allowed. Opponents No.01 to 04 filed their affidavits cum no objection at Ex.06 to 09. Applicant and her witness Rashid Ali filed their affidavits in evidence, they both re-called and re-affirmed at Ex.10 and 11. Counsel for applicant filed side close statement at Ex.12. To come up on 31.8.2026 for arguments. |
||
| 6 | F.S. (Family Suits) 178/2026 | Mst Shakeela Zardari VS Ashfaque Ahmed Zardari | Abdul Rasheed(ADVO-501-SBC-DDU) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family suit called. Plaintiff alongside her counsel is called present. Notice returned served upon the defendant but he called absent, order passed; service held good. Put off to 02.9.2026 for WS. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 7 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 23/2026 | Mst Ruzina VS The Public at Large and others | Shahzado(ADVO-304-SBC-DDU) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 10 | G & W Application called. Applicant alongside her counsel is called present. Reports already received from Mukhtiarkar, Secretary U.C Qazi Arif and NADRA. Applicant and her witnesses Munwar Ali and Aijaz Ali filed thier affidavits in evidence, they re-called and re-affirmed at Ex.03 to 05. Put off to 28.08.2026 for compliance of order 32 CPC. |
||
| 8 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 29/2026 | Mst Rubina VS The Public at Large and others | Muhammad Azam(ADVO-679-SBC-DDU) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 10,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 (For Custody) | G & W application called. Applicant alongside her learned counsel is called present. The report from NADRA Mehar and Mukhtiarkar Mehar with regard to list of LRs already received. Opponent No.01 has also filed affidavit cum no objection in favour of applicant. Report from Mukhtiarkar Mehar with regard to property of minors not received. Clerk of Mukhtiarkar appeared and filed application for time, order passed on it; 7 days granted. Put off to 28.8.2026 for report of Mukhtiarkar and arguments. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Pre-Trial | |||||||
| 9 | F.S. (Family Suits) 122/2026 | Mst Naima Khatoon VS Aslam Chandio | Abid Ali(ADVO-320-SBC-DDU) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Family suit called. Plaintiff alongside her counsel Mr. Abid Ali Chandio is called present. Defendant called absent and already declared exparte. Plaintiff and her witness Mst. Irshad filed their affidavits in evidence, both re-called and re-affirmed at Ex.03 & 04. Counsel for plaintiff filed side close statement at Ex.05. Put off to 31.8.2026 for arguments. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Hearing of Applications | |||||||
| 10 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 31/2026 | Asif Ali VS The Public at Large and others | Abdul Rasheed(ADVO-501-SBC-DDU) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-Application U/S 7 & 10 of Guardian & Ward Act | G&W application called. Applicant alongside his counsel is called present. Opponents No.01 to 03 are present and filed their affidavits cum no objection at Ex.03 to 05. Applicant filed his affidavit in evidence, he re-called and re-affirmed at Ex.06. Matter is adjourned to 02.9.2026 for further proceedings. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 11 | F.S. (Family Suits) 283/2025 | Pardeep VS Mst Son Pari | Ayaz Ali (ADVO-761-SBC-DDU) | Family Suit-Suit for Judicial Separation of Marriage | Family suit called. Plaintiff and his learned counsel are repeatedly called absent. No intimation received. Defendant alongside junior partner for advocate of plaintiff is present. File shows that since last 8 date of hearings matter is pending for plaintiff side evidence, but he has failed to adduce the same. In the circumstances the suit in hand is dismissed for non-prosecution. Order passed on separate sheet. After pronouncement of order learned counsel for plaintiff appeared in late hours and he was informed accordingly. |
||
| 12 | F.S. (Family Suits) 95/2026 | Mst Salma VS Abdul Aziz | Misri Khan(ADVO-460-SBC-DDU) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family Suit called. Plaintiff is present alongside her learned counsel. Defendant called absent, whereas his learned counsel called present and put no objection on the application u/s 17-A, order passed; application allowed. Defendant to pay interim maintenance Rs.2000/- for each child. Counsel for defendant also filed application for adjournment, which is allowed. Put off to 04.9.2026 for evidence of plaintiff side. |
||
| 13 | F.S. (Family Suits) 75/2026 | Mst Nadia VS Abdul Majeed Solangi | Peer Bux(ADVO-440-SBC-DDU) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | family suit is called. Plaintiff is present, her counsel called absent. Defendant called absent, whereas his counsel called present and filed application for adjournment, which is granted. To come up on 02.9.2026 for cross examination of plaintiff side. |
||
| 14 | F.S. (Family Suits) 66/2026 | Mst Akhtiryan VS Sadaruddin Khan | Abdul Waheed(ADVO-947-SBC-DDU) | Insaf Ali(ADVO-949-SBC-DDU) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Family suit called. Plaintiff alongside her counsel is called present. Defendant alongside his counsel is also called present. Counsel for plaintiff filed application u/s 17-A, order passed on it; Notice to other side. copy supplied. Plaintiff filed her affidavit in evidence, she re-called and re-affirmed at Ex.05. Matter is adjourned to 02.9.2026 for objections on application u/s 17-A of Family Court Act and cross examination of plaintiff. |
|
| 15 | F.S. (Family Suits) 107/2026 | Abdul Aziz VS Mst Salma | Ayaz Ali (ADVO-761-SBC-DDU) | Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Amount | Family suit called. Plaintiff called absent, his learned counsel is called present. Defendant is present alongside her counsel. Counsel for plaintiff filed application for adjournment, which is granted. Put off to 04.9.2026 for evidence of plaintiff side. |
||
| 16 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 27/2026 | Mst Zareena VS Mst Mehak | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-Application U/S 7 & 10 of Guardian & Ward Act,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 (For Custody) | G&W application called. Applicant and her learned counsel called present. Opponent and her learned counsel also called present. Counsel for the applicant filed application for adjournment, which is granted. Put off to 04.9.2026 for evidence. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 17 | F.S. (Family Suits) 301/2025 | Mst Gulshan VS Munir Ahmed | Mohammad Ali (ADVO-675-SBC-DDU) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family suit called. Plaintiff is called present alongside her learned counsel. Attorney of defendant and his learned counsel are called present. Counsel for plaintiff filed application for adjournment application, which is granted. Put off to 04.9.2026 for arguments. |
||
| 18 | F.S. (Family Suits) 115/2026 | Mst Khursheed VS Saleem | Muhammad Azam(ADVO-679-SBC-DDU) | Family Suit-Dissolution of Marriage on the option of puberty | Family suit called. Plaintiff alongside her learned counsel is present. Defendant is exparte. Arguments heard. Judgment passed and announced in open Court. Suit decree exparte. Let the decree be prepared accordingly. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Compliance | |||||||
| 19 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 15/2026 | Mst Mehwish VS Ahmed Naerjo | Insaf Ali(ADVO-949-SBC-DDU) | Family Execution-Execution Application | Family execution application called. Applicant alongside her learned counsel is called absent. Put off to 19.9.2026 for compliance. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Exparte Evidence | |||||||
| 20 | F.S. (Family Suits) 129/2026 | Mst Mehak VS Saeed Ali | Asadullah (ADVO-759-SBC-DDU) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Family suit called. Plaintiff alongside her learned counsel is present. Defendant is exparte. Objections not filed on application U/S: 17-A of WPFA. Order passed; application allowed. Defendant to pay Rs.4000/- as interim maintenance for minor. Put off to 04.9.2026 for exparte evidence. |
||