| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | PPC 24/2024 | The State VS Abdul Ghaffar Khoso | Abdul Saboor(ADVO-274-SBC-DDU) | PPC-489-F,PPC-506-B | 8/2020 Mehar |
Criminal case called. Accused Abdul Ghaffar Khoso present and submitted application for time to pay the amount to complainant, order passed on it; Granted as last chance. Complainant is present. Put off to 28.03.2026 for evidence. Issue summons to P.Ws. |
|
| 2 | PPC 74/2025 | The State VS Muhammad Nawaz and others | Zulfiqar Ali(ADVO-375-SBC-DDU) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-Fi,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | 34/2025 Faridabad |
Case called. Accused Arbab is present on bail. Accused Muhammad Nawaz, Muharam, Irfan, Jaffar and Saffar are already declared proclaimed offenders. The learned counsel for accused present, The learned ADPP for the State present. Complainant and P.Ws called absent. Summons issued to them returned unserved, same extended. Put off to 28.3.2026 for evidence. Accused is directed to attend. |
|
| 3 | PPC 86/2025 | The State VS Madad and others | Zulfiqar Ali(ADVO-375-SBC-DDU) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-337-A(i),PPC-452,PPC-504 | 56/2025 Faridabad |
Case called. Accused Madad, Ali Khan, Nawab and Nawaz are present on bail. The learned ADPP for the state appeared. The learned counsel for accused called absent. Complainant Mst. Rani is present and submitted adjournment application which is granted. Complainant is directed to produce private P.Ws on next date of hearing. Summons to P.Ws also extended. Put off to 17.3.2026 for evidence. Accused are directed to attend. |
|
| 4 | PPC 97/2025 | The State VS Naveed Depar and others | Zulfiqar Ali(ADVO-375-SBC-DDU) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-452,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | 61/2025 Faridabad |
Case called. Accused Ameer Ali, Saen Rakhio, Naveed, Waheed, Bashir are present on bail. ADPP present for the State. Counsel for accused present. Complainant submitted adjournment application, which is granted. Put off to 19.3.2026 for evidence. Summons to P.Ws. extended. Present accused are directed to attend. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 5 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 11/2026 | The State VS Suhbat Khoso | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 4/2026 Shah Panjo |
Sent up. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Surety Proceedings | |||||||
| 6 | PPC 42/2025 | The state VS Tarique @ Siti | Zulfiqar Ali(ADVO-375-SBC-DDU) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 10 | 17/2025 Shah Panjo |
Case called. Accused Tarique alias Siti has jumped over the bail and has been declared proclaimed offender. Put off to 17.3.2026 for further proceedings. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | IInd Class Civil Suits 2/2026 |
Shamsuddin VS DR Muhib Mahessar and another | Shahzado(ADVO-304-SBC-DDU) | Civil Suit Called. Plaintiff and his counsel are called present. Defendant No. 01 Dr Muhib Mahessar was served on 02.02.2026 but has not yet appeared, no intimation received. As a second thought plaintiff through his counsel files a statement to withdraw the suit. In light of statement the suit in hand is dismissed as withdrawn. Order passed on order sheet. File be consigned to record. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 2 | IInd Class Civil Suits 12/2025 |
Mst Ghulam Sughra VS Mst Mariam | Saddam Hussain(ADVO-637-SBC-DDU) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | Civil suit called. Plaintiff is called absent, her counsel is present. File shows in the month of April 2025 the suit was admitted, the defendant No.04 was served and filed his written statement. On 27.10.2025 Mr. Sher Ali Chandio, learned advocate for defendant No. 04 filed a statement on behalf of defendant No.01, 02 and 03, thereby adopted same written statement on behalf of the defendants as earlier filed on behalf of defendant No.04. Perusal of file shows no any Vakalatnama had been filed by learned counsel on behalf of Defendant No.1, 2 and 3. The statement may confirmed the knowledge/service of defendant No. 1, 2 and 3 but without signing any Vakalatnama they cannot legally proceed with the matter through an advocate. Even the document, not sign by an advocate which to any legal empowerment/Vakalatnama it has no value in the eye of law. Thus, the defendant No. 1, 2 and 3 are debbard from filling written statement and are declared ex-parte. Put off to 26.03.2026 for interrogatories/issues. |
||
| 3 | IInd Class Civil Suits 3/2026 |
Nadeem Dayo VS Munwar Ali | Muhammad Saleem Thebo(ADVO-819-SBC-DDU) | Civil suit called. Plaintiff is present, his counsel is called absent. Defendant and his counsel are called absent. Today matter is fixed filling of written statement, the counsel for defendant has send an adjournment application through his assistant. Order on it. Granted adjourned to 16.03.2026 for ws. |
|||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| 1 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 3/2026 | Ghulam Raza VS Muhammad Raza &an other | Saddam Hussain(ADVO-637-SBC-DDU) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-Application U/S 7 & 10 of Guardian & Ward Act | G & W Application called. Applicant along-side his counsel is present. In the response to notice proposed guardian ad-litem Ali Gul has appeared and gives his consent to be appointed guardian Ad-Litem of minors Ali Raza and Baby Aisha. Order passed and maintained on separate Sheet. The application is allowed. Ali Gul the guardian ad-litem of minors files his affidavit for no objection on behalf of minors. Order on it. Taken on record. Learned counsel submits that applicant may be appointed as guardian of minors for maintaining their educational affairs and to collect the Pension Benefits of his deceased father. Matter adjourned to 27.03.2026 for hearing/call details of benefits of deceased employ Aijaz Ali Khokhar from concerned department. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 2 | F.S. (Family Suits) 334/2025 | Mst Sapna VS Abdul Latif Chandio | Irshad Ali(ADVO-1020-SBC-DDU) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family suit called. Plaintiff and her counsel are called absent. Defendant Abdul Latif along-side of his counsel is present and filed written statement. Order on it. Copy to other side. Matter adjourned to 13.03.2026 for pre-trial. |
||
| 3 | F.S. (Family Suits) 32/2026 | Mst Sania VS Zakir Ali Mallah | Abdul Khalique(ADVO-349-SBC-DDU) | Family Suit-Suit for Jactitation of Marriage ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family suit called. Plaintiff along-side her counsel is present. Defendant is called absent and not yet served. Process issued against defendant through learned Family Court K N shah has not returned either served or unserved. Matter adjourned to 16.03.2026 for return of process. |
||
| 4 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 11/2026 | Mst Reshma VS Shabir khoso | Shahzado(ADVO-304-SBC-DDU) | Family Execution-Execution Application | Family Execution application called. Applicant along-side her counsel is present. J.D called absent and not yet served. Process issued against J.D through learned Family Court K.N.Shah has not returned either served or un-served. Matter adjourned to 16.03.2026 for return of process. |
||
| 5 | F.S. (Family Suits) 40/2026 | Mst Sobhiya VS Adnan joyo | Abdul Rasheed(ADVO-501-SBC-DDU) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family suit called.Plaintiff is called absent, her counsel is present. Process issued against defendant has returned served. In response to summon defendant has appeared, received copy of plaint and files an application for time to engage to counsel. Order on it. Time granted. The service against defendant is held good. Order passed on separate sheet. To come up on 12.03.2026 for written statement. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 6 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 67/2025 | Mst Nagina VS The Public at Large and others | Hatim Ali(ADVO-1004-SBC-DDU) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 29 Guardian and wards Act 1890 for permission of sale,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 7 | G & W applicant called. Applicant along-side her counsel is called present. Property report has been received from the office of Mukhtiarkar Revenue Mehar. Order on it. Kept on record. Learned counsel for applicant files an adjournment application due to correction in the name of minor Ghulam shah. Order on it. Granted adjourned to 28.03.2026 for hearing. |
||
| 7 | F.S. (Family Suits) 337/2025 | Mst Benzair VS Altaf Junejo | Shahzado(ADVO-304-SBC-DDU) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Family suit called. Plaintiff along-side her counsel is called present. The defendant has served through phone call, obtained time but remained failed to appear and file written statement. In attending circumstances the court is left with no options except to debbar defendant from filling of written statement. The defendant debbared from filling of written statement. Order passed on order sheet. Put off to 17.03.2026 for pre-trial |
||
| 8 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 6/2026 | Mst Zainab VS The Public At Large | Ali Hyder Sand (ADVO-51177-SBC-DDU) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-Application U/S 7 & 10 of Guardian & Ward Act | G & W application called. Applicant and her counsel called absent without any intimation. File shows since the filling of application neither applicant nor her counsel is appearing before this court. In the interest of justice one opportunity is extended to applicant for perusing her matter. The report submitted SHO PS A/Section Mehar reflects that applicant along-side minors reside at Sita Road, Taluka K N Shah Adjourned to 18.03.2026 for appearance of applicant. |
|
| 9 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 9/2026 | Zohaib Ali VS Mst Reema | Muhammad Saleem Thebo(ADVO-819-SBC-DDU) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 of Guardian and Wards Act R/W 100 Cr.PC,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 7 | G&W application called. Applicant Zuhaib Ali called present whereas is counsel called absent. The memo of application show that opponent Mst Reema filed a family suit against applicant for dissolution of marriage and maintenance against present applicant before learned Family Court Larkana, the applicant present before this court himself submits that still the deposits maintenance for minors at family court larkana but after second marriage opponent Mst Reema reside with her second husband at Dadu. On contraryonewajid Ali, the brother of opponent MstReema filed application on last date of hearing that opponent Mst Reema presently reside at Malik House Graveyard, Gulshan-E-Sajad Hyderabad. In all counts this court has no jurisdiction to entertain an application U/s: 25 of G & W act, therefore the applicant given notice to satisfy the court through his counsel on point of maintainability/jurisdiction. Matter come up to 26.03.2026 for service and hearing. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 10 | F.S. (Family Suits) 122/2025 | Mst Sonia VS Imran | Saeed Ahmed(ADVO-520-SBC-DDU) | Aijaz Ali(ADVO-592-SBC-DDU) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family suit called. Both parties and there are called absent, which to without any intimation. File shows since last 13 date of hearing matter is pending for plaintiff???s evidence but she has remained fail to adduce the same. In the interest of justice last and final chance granted to plaintiff for producing evidence. Matter adjourned to 19.03.2026 for evidence of plaintiff. |
|
| 11 | F.S. (Family Suits) 256/2025 | Mst Farhana VS Nadeem Chandio | Mohammad Ali (ADVO-675-SBC-DDU) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family suit called. Plaintiff along-side her counsel is called present. Defendant is present and filed an adjournment application due to absence of his counsel. File shows on last date of hearing plaintiff along-side her witnesses was present and matter was adjourned due to filling of adjournment application from defendant side. In the interest of justice the adjournment application granted with direction to defendant to insure attendance of his counsel and proceeding of case. Matter adjourned to 26.03.2026 for evidence of plaintiff |
||
| 12 | F.S. (Family Suits) 301/2025 | Mst Gulshan VS Munir Ahmed | Mohammad Ali (ADVO-675-SBC-DDU) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family suit called. Plaintiff along-side her counsel is present. The attorney of defendant and his counsel are also in attendance and gives no objections to applications filed U/S: 17-A and 7(2) of west Pakistan family court act 1964. Heard and perused. The application U/s: 17-A WPFC Act 1964 is allowed by consent and the interim maintenance of each minor is fixed Rs. 5000/-. The application U/S; 12(2) WPFC Act 1964 is also allowed with consent. Order passed on separate sheet and taken on record. Matter adjourned to 27.03.2026 for evidence of plaintiff side. |
||
| 13 | F.S. (Family Suits) 319/2025 | Mst Faiza VS Amjad Ali Samo | Saeed Ahmed(ADVO-520-SBC-DDU) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family suit called. Plaintiff and her counsel are called absent. Defendant is absent, his counsel is in attendance. Today matter is fixed for evidence of plaintiff???s side. In the interest of justice matter is adjourned to 27.03.2026 for evidence of plaintiff side. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 14 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 5/2026 | Mst Subhan Khatoon VS Public At Large | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-Application U/S 7 & 10 of Guardian & Ward Act,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 29 Guardian and wards Act 1890 for permission of sale | G & W application called. Applicant and her counsel are present. The applicant and her witness are submitted affidavit in evidence. Order passed on. Taken on recorded their statement also recorded. The learned counsel for applicant submitted side closed statement. Order passed thereon. File shows on last date of hearing applicant through her counsel withdrew the prayer for sale of property made U/S: 29 of G&W Act and presses the matter to extend of appointing her as guardian of minor to maintain her educational affairs and obtaining CNIC/Form-B from NADRA. Adjourned to 11.03.2026 for further proceedings. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Compliance | |||||||
| 15 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 7/2023 | Mst: Mehnaz VS Muhammad Aslam Chandio | Saeed Ahmed(ADVO-520-SBC-DDU) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | Family Execution-Execution Application | Matter called. Plaintiff/Decree holder Mst Mehnaz called absent and her advocate Mr Seed Ahmed Panhwar absent. Defendant J.D Muhammad Aslam Chandio called absent. Report of blocking CNIC of J.D not received from NADRA, called the same. Put off to 25.3.2026 for compliance. |
|
| 16 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 28/2025 | Mst Reema Chandio VS Gulab Chandio | Saddam Hussain(ADVO-637-SBC-DDU) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | Family Execution-Execution Application | ||
| 17 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 53/2025 | Mst Bakhtwar alias Sapna VS Sajajd Ali | Muhammad Saleem Thebo(ADVO-819-SBC-DDU) | Family Execution-Execution Application | Exec. Application called. DH present. Her counsel present. J.D is present, his counsel present. J.D had already deposited maintenance amount Rs.48000/- and today he deposited medical expenses amount Rs.100,000/- such receipt issued to him. DH filed application for same amount which is allowed Total amount Rs.1,48000/- paid to her on proper receipt. To come up on 16.3.2026 for compliance. |
||