| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | PPC 44/2024 | The State VS Ashraf Chandio & Others | Abdul Saboor(ADVO-274-SBC-DDU) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-Fi,PPC-403,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | 29/2024 Faridabad |
|
| 2 | PPC 82/2025 | The State VS Ashraf Chandio and others | Zulfiqar Ali(ADVO-375-SBC-DDU) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-Fiv,PPC-337-L,PPC-506-B | 39/2025 Faridabad |
||
| 3 | DC (Direct Complaint) 29/2025 | Ali Khan VS Zahid Ali and others | Mohammad Ali (ADVO-675-SBC-DDU) | PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-Fi,PPC-337-L | / |
Criminal Direct Complaint called. Complainant alongside his learned cousel are callled absent. Accused Sadam present on bail. Accused Zahid is declared proclaimed offender. Process issued to P.Ws returned un-served, same is extended. Today work is suspended on the call of DBA Dadu. Put off to 26.10.2026 for evidence. Accused is directed to attend. |
|
| 4 | PPC 14/2026 | The State VS Ali Sher and others | Zulfiqar Ali(ADVO-375-SBC-DDU) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-502,PPC-53-8-2 | 1/2026 Shah Godrio, Dadu |
Case called. Accused Abdul Khaliq, Ghulam Shabir, Bijar, Gulsher, Wazir and Lutuf are present on bail except accused Ali Sher. One applicant namely Muhammad Siddique chandio is present and submitted condo-nation application on behalf of absence accused Ali Sher. Order passed on it. Excused. Learned ADPP for the state and Learned counsel for complainant are present. Complainant is present. Learned Counsel for accused Mr. Sadam Hussain Gilal is absent. No P.Ws is present. Today work is suspended on the call of DBA Dadu. Put off to 26.10.2026 for evidence. Present accused are directed to attend. Complainant to bring his witnesses. |
|
| 5 | PPC 12/2026 | The State VS Subahat Khoso and others | Zulfiqar Ali(ADVO-375-SBC-DDU) | PPC-379,PPC-381-A | 3/2026 Shah Panjo |
Criminal case called. Accused Aslam Shaikh is called absent without any intimation. Accused Suhbat produced in custody by the District Jail Dadu. Learned ADPP for the State is present. Learned Counsel Mr. Zahid Ali Chandio for accused Aslam is absent. Learned Cousnel Mr. Liaquat Ali Depar for accused Suhbat is present. Complainant is called present, whereas his learned counsel Mr. Aqib Khan Chandio is absent. I.O Ahmed Ali Solangi is also present. Matter could not be proceeded due to work is suspended on the call of DBA, Dadu. Put off to 19.10.2026 for evidence of I.O. Accused Suhbat remanded back to jail. Issue notice to surety of accused Aslam Shaikh through SHO concerned. |
|
| 6 | PPC 13/2026 | The State VS Abdul Hussain and others | Zulfiqar Ali(ADVO-375-SBC-DDU) | Muhammad Azam(ADVO-679-SBC-DDU) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-506-B | 1/2026 Faridabad |
Criminal case called. Accused 01- Abdul Hussain, 02 - Niaz Hussain, 03- Wajid @ Wajib and 04- Majeed are present on bail. While accused Ali Haider, Sikandar and Rajib are declared P.Os. Complainant is called absent. Pw namely Muhammad Siddique is present and filed condo-nation application on behalf of complainant. Order passed on it. Excused. Learned ADPP for the State iand learned counsel for complainant and accused are present. Today work is suspended on the call of DBA, Dadu Put off to 26.10.2026 for evidence. Present accused are directed to attend. Present Pw is directed to inform the next date of hearing to comlainant. |
| 7 | PPC 46/2026 | The State VS Abdul Khalique and others | Zulfiqar Ali(ADVO-375-SBC-DDU) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-506-B | 13/2026 Faridabad |
||
| 8 | PPC 41/2026 | The State VS Shah Ali Khoso and others | Zulfiqar Ali(ADVO-375-SBC-DDU) | PPC-215,PPC-382 | 38/2026 Faridabad |
||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Issues | |||||||
| 1 | IInd Class Civil Suits 14/2026 |
Ghulm Shabir VS Ahmed and another | Hamid Ali Chandio(ADVO-333-SBC-DDU) | ||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 2 | IInd Class Civil Suits 12/2025 |
Mst Ghulam Sughra VS Mst Mariam | Saddam Hussain(ADVO-637-SBC-DDU) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | |||
| 3 | IInd Class Civil Suits 6/2026 |
Muhammad Khan VS Inyatullah Chandio | Sher Ali (ADVO-671-SBC-DDU) | ||||
| 4 | IIIrd Class Civil Suits 13/2026 |
Pir Faheem Qureshi VS Mst Farhana Qureshi | Abdul Waheed(ADVO-947-SBC-DDU) | ||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | F.S. (Family Suits) 133/2026 | Mst Muskan VS Abdul Aziz Tunio | Mumtaz Ali Panhwar(ADVO-751-SBC-DDU) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family suit called. Plaintiff and her learned counsel are called absent. Defendant has not yet been served, as the plaintiff has failed to deposit the notice cost. File shows that plaintiff was directed to furnish proper/correct address of defendant, however she has failed to do so. Neither the plaintiff nor her learned counsel has appeared before this court for the last 08 consecutive dates of hearing. in the interest of justice last oppotunioty is granted to the plaintiff to appear before this court. Today work is suspended on the call of DBA, Dadu. Put off to 19.10.2026 for service. |
||
| 2 | F.S. (Family Suits) 174/2026 | Mst Asmma VS Azizullah Khoso | Irshad Ali(ADVO-1020-SBC-DDU) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | |||
| 3 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 28/2026 | Mst Hina VS Ahmed Ali Brohi | Saba (ADVO-1044-SBC-DDU) | Family Execution-Execution Application | |||
| 4 | F.S. (Family Suits) 208/2026 | Mst WAheedan VS Abid Hussain Sodhar | Aijaz Ali(ADVO-592-SBC-DDU) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | |||
| 5 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 34/2026 | Mst Murk VS Waseem Ali | Jawaid Ali(ADVO-747-SBC-DDU) | Family Execution-Execution Application | |||
| 6 | F.S. (Family Suits) 223/2026 | Mst Mona VS Abdul Razaque | Abid Hussain Kalhoro(ADVO-905-SBC-DDU) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | |||
| 7 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 54/2026 | Ghulam Hussain Tunio VS Mst Aysha and others | Shahid Hussain Shah(ADVO-567-SBC-DDU) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-Application U/S 7 & 10 of Guardian & Ward Act,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 (For Custody) | |||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 8 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 47/2026 | Khalid Lakhiar VS Punhal | Muhammad Saleem Thebo(ADVO-819-SBC-DDU) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-Application U/S 7 & 10 of Guardian & Ward Act,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 of Guardian and Wards Act R/W 100 Cr.PC | G&W application called. Applicant is called absent, whereas his learned counsel is present. Opponent is also called absent, whereas his learned counsel is present and filed adjournment application. Order passed on it. Adjournment granted. Today work is suspended on the call lof DBa, Dadu. Put off to 19.10.2026 for objections |
||
| 9 | F.S. (Family Suits) 203/2026 | Mst Raveena VS Sajid Ali Solangi | Najeebur Rehman(ADVO-475-SBC-DDU) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | |||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Pre-Trial | |||||||
| 10 | F.S. (Family Suits) 141/2026 | Mst Sameena Khoso VS Nazeer Ahmed Khoso | Saddam Hussain(ADVO-637-SBC-DDU) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | |||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Hearing of Applications | |||||||
| 11 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 47/2025 | Mst Bibi Zareena VS Mst Bibi Ajeeban & others | Rahim Bux Bughio(ADVO-480-SBC-DDU) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-Application U/S 7 & 10 of Guardian & Ward Act,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 of Guardian and Wards Act R/W 100 Cr.PC | |||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Issues | |||||||
| 12 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 42/2026 | Mozal Shah VS Mst Janat Khatoon | Muhammad Azam(ADVO-679-SBC-DDU) | Shahid Hussain Shah(ADVO-567-SBC-DDU) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-Application U/S 7 & 10 of Guardian & Ward Act,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 of Guardian and Wards Act R/W 100 Cr.PC | ||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 13 | F.S. (Family Suits) 143/2026 | Mst Hakim Chandio VS Aamir Ali Chandio | Jawaid Ali(ADVO-747-SBC-DDU) | Saeed Ahmed(ADVO-520-SBC-DDU) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | ||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Further Proceedings | |||||||
| 14 | F.S. (Family Suits) 25/2026 | Mst. Benazir VS Suhbat Zardari | Zahid Ali(ADVO-321-SBC-DDU) | Saddam Hussain(ADVO-637-SBC-DDU) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | ||