| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Hearing | |||||||
| 1 | PPC 22/2025 | The state VS Irfan Peerzado & others | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | Imtiaz Ali Panhwar (ADVO-814-SBC-DDU),Mumtaz Ali Panhwar(ADVO-751-SBC-DDU) | PPC-382,PPC-429,PPC-457 | 4/2025 Shah Panjo |
Case called. Accused Irfan present on bail, while accused Munwar is produced in custody from sub jail Mehar. Complainant, his counsel and ADPP for the State are present. Counsel for accused is present. File shows that supplementary challan has not been submitted by the SHO. Issue show cause notice against him. Put off to 20.4.2026 for supplementary challan. |
| 2 | PPC 19/2026 | The State VS Muhammad Laique and others | Zulfiqar Ali(ADVO-375-SBC-DDU) | PPC-324,PPC-353 | 4/2026 Faridabad |
Case called. Accused Muhammad Laiq and Murtaza are produced from District Prison Dadu, while accused Rashid, Haleem, Seengar, Niaz and Insaf are declared proclaimed offenders. Put off to 16.4.2026 for supply of case papers. UTPs remanded back to custody. |
|
| 3 | BA in SC (Bail Application in Cases) 10/2026 | Munwar Ali VS The State | Zulfiqar Ali(ADVO-375-SBC-DDU) | PPC-382,PPC-457 | 4/2025 Shah Panjo |
B.A called. Counsel for applicant/accused is present. Complainant and his counsel are present. ADPP is present. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open Court. Bail granted to applicant/accused in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with PR bond in the like amount. B.A disposed of accordingly. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 4 | PPC 52/2025 | The state VS Ali Lashari & otehrs | Zulfiqar Ali(ADVO-375-SBC-DDU) | Hamid Ali Chandio(ADVO-333-SBC-DDU) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8 | 26/2025 Faridabad |
Criminal case called. Accused Ali Lashari has been produced by sub jail Mehar Accused Khadim Hussain present in court on bail. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Case papers supplied to accused Khadim and such receipt obtained at Ex.8. Matter to come up on 27.04.2026 for amended charge. Accused Khadim is directed to attend, accused Ali remanded back to custody. |
| 5 | PPC 97/2025 | The State VS Naveed Depar and others | Zulfiqar Ali(ADVO-375-SBC-DDU) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-452,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | 61/2025 Faridabad |
Case called. Accused Ameer Ali, Saen Rakhio, Naveed, Waheed, Bashir are present on bail. ADPP present for the State. Complainant called absent. Accused stated that they have compromised with complainant party. Put off to 13.4.2026 for evidence. Present accused are directed to attend. Issue summons to P.Ws. |
|
| 6 | PPC 1/2026 | The State VS Ayaz Lakhair & Others | Zulfiqar Ali(ADVO-375-SBC-DDU) | Abid Hussain Kalhoro(ADVO-905-SBC-DDU) | PPC-215,PPC-381-A | 36/2025 Shah Panjo |
Criminal case called. Accused Ayaz, Parvaiz and Fayaz are present on bail. Learned ADPP for state is present whereas counsel for accused is called absent. Complainant and PWs called absent. Issue summons to P.Ws. Matter adjourned to 28.04.2026 for evidence. Accused are directed to attend. |
| 7 | PPC 2/2026 | The State VS Nazir Siyal | Zulfiqar Ali(ADVO-375-SBC-DDU) | Zahid Ali(ADVO-321-SBC-DDU) | PPC-381-A | 37/2025 Shah Panjo |
Criminal case called. Accused Nazir is present on bail. Learned ADPP for state is present whereas counsel for accused is called absent. Complainant and PWs are present. Mr. Muhammad Khan Solangi filed Vakalantnama on behalf of complainant and also filed adjournment application, which allowed. Matter adjourned to 29.04.2026 for evidence. Present accused is directed to attend. Complainant and P.Ws are also directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 8 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 17/2026 | The State VS Ghulam Murtaza | Zulfiqar Ali(ADVO-375-SBC-DDU) | SINDH ARMS ACT-25-A | 6/2026 Faridabad |
Criminal case called. Accused Ghulam Murtaza produced from District Jail Dadu. ADPP is present. Put off to 16.4.2026 for charge. Accused remanded back to jail. |
|
| 9 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 16/2026 | The State VS Muhammad Laique | Zulfiqar Ali(ADVO-375-SBC-DDU) | SINDH ARMS ACT-25-A | 5/2026 Faridabad |
Criminal case called. Accused Muhammad Laiq produced from District Jail Dadu. ADPP is present. Put off to 16.4.2026 for sent up. |
|
| 10 | PPC 22/2026 | The State VS Qaim Khan Chandio and others | Zulfiqar Ali(ADVO-375-SBC-DDU) | Abid Hussain Kalhoro(ADVO-905-SBC-DDU) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-506-B | 9/2026 Faridabad |
Criminal case called. Accused Haji Qaim, Ghulam Sarwar, Ashique, Fahad, Neengar and Jalal are present on bail. Learned ADPP for the state, counsel for complainant and accused are called absent. Charge is framed against accused at Exh.2 to which they pleaded not guilty and claim trial. Pleas of accused are recorded accordingly at Ex.02/A to 2/F. Matter to come up on 21.04.2026 for evidence. Accused present on bail and they are directed to attend. Issue summon against complainant and PWs. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Statement of Accused | |||||||
| 11 | DC (Direct Complaint) 14/2025 | Abdul Karim VS Ali Gohar & others | Insaf Ali(ADVO-949-SBC-DDU) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | / |
Criminal direct complaint called. Accused Shamasuddin, Abdul Waheed Ali Gohar and Noor Ahmed are present on bail and filed application for condonation of their absence vacating of B.Ws, order passed on it. Counsel for accused called absent. Complainant is present and his counsel called present. Statements of accused recorded at Ex. 06 to 09. Put off to 23.04.2026 final arguments. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For U/S 88 Cr. P.C | |||||||
| 12 | PPC 20/2026 | The State VS Muhammad Laique and others | Zulfiqar Ali(ADVO-375-SBC-DDU) | PPC-397 | 2/2026 Faridabad |
Case called. Accused Muhammad Laiq and Murtaza are produced from District Prison Dadu, while accused Seengar, Haleem, Rashid, Abdul Sattar, Akram and Insaf are declared proclaimed offenders. The report u/s 88 Cr.P.C in respect of absconding accused Rashid already received from Mukhtiarkar Mehar which placed on record at Ex.03, while report of absconding accused persons Seengar, Haleem and Insaf already received from Mukhtiarkar Taluka Warah same placed on record at Ex.04. The report u/s 88 Cr.PC in respect of absconding accused Abdul Sattar and Akram not received from the Mukhtiarkar Taluka Jhall Magsi. Put off to 16.4.2026 for report u/s 88 Cr.P.C from the Mukhtiarkar Jhall Magsi. Accused Muhammad Laiq and Ghulam Murtaza remanded back to jail. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | IInd Class Civil Suits 17/2025 |
Ahmed Ali Lashari VS Ali Gohr | Aamir Muneer(ADVO-25066-SBC-KHS) | Civil suit called. Both parties along-side their counsels are called present. The cross examination Ahmed Ali and his witness Qurban Ali has been conducted by learned counsel of defendant. The learned counsel for plaintiff has closed the side of plaintiff for further evidence at Ex.09. Put off to 29.04.2026 for evidence of defendant side. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Hearing of Applications | |||||||
| 2 | (Civil Misc. Applications In Case) 310/2025 |
Fathe Muhammad VS Mst Kubra | Application u/o 7 R 11 CPC disposed of. |
||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 14/2026 | Mst Hida VS Parviaz | Abid Hussain Kalhoro(ADVO-905-SBC-DDU) | Family Execution-Execution Application | Family execution application called. Applicant/D.H is present and her counsel called absent. Notice issued to opponent/J.D returned served, but he called absent, order passed on order sheet; service held good. Put off to 29.04.2026 for objections. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 2 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 6/2026 | Mst Khshboo VS Jameel Ahmed | Saba (ADVO-1044-SBC-DDU) | Family Execution-Execution Application | Family execution application called. DH present, her counsel called absent. J.D is present and filed adjournment application, which granted as last and final chance. Put off to 15.4.2026 for objections. |
||
| 3 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 7/2026 | Mst Murk Khaskheli VS Nazeer Ahmed | Peer Bux(ADVO-440-SBC-DDU) | Family Execution-Execution Application | Family Execution Application called. Applicant Mst Murk called absent, her counsel is present. J.D Nazeer Ahmed is present alongside his counsel Mr. Aqib Chandio filed objections, copy supplied to other side. Matter adjourned to 29.4.2026 for arguments. |
||
| 4 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 12/2026 | Mst Ghanwa VS Zaheer Ali | Muhammad Azam(ADVO-679-SBC-DDU) | Family Execution-Execution Application | Family execution application called. Applicant along-side her learned counsel called present. Opponent called absent. File shows vide order dated: 26.03.2026 service upon opponent was ordered to be held good. Despite of time neither opponent turns to the court nor his counsel. In attending circumstances opponent is debarred from filling of objection and is declared ex-parte. Order passed on separate sheet. Matter adjourned to 29.04.2026 for arguments |
||
| 5 | F.S. (Family Suits) 50/2026 | Mst Benzir VS Ali Nawaz Gaincho | Abid Hussain Kalhoro(ADVO-905-SBC-DDU) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Family suit called. Plaintiff is present, her counsel called absent. Defendant called absent. In the interest of justice matter is adjourned to 20.4.2026 for W.S. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Pre-Trial | |||||||
| 6 | F.S. (Family Suits) 283/2025 | Pardeep VS Mst Son Pari | Ayaz Ali (ADVO-761-SBC-DDU) | Family Suit-Suit for Judicial Separation of Marriage | Family suit called. Plaintiff along-side his counsel is present. Defendant called absent and her counsel also absent. Issues framed at Ex.04. Counsel for plaintiff filed adjournment application, which allowed. Put off to 20.04.2026 for plaintiff evidence. |
||
| 7 | F.S. (Family Suits) 14/2026 | Raheela VS Khair Muhammad | Abid Ali(ADVO-320-SBC-DDU) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Both parties are present. Pretrial held successful. Parties settled their dispute amicably and filed such application. Order passed on it. Suit disposed of accordingly. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 8 | F.S. (Family Suits) 122/2025 | Mst Sonia VS Imran | Saeed Ahmed(ADVO-520-SBC-DDU) | Aijaz Ali(ADVO-592-SBC-DDU) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family suit called. Both parties and their counsels are called absent. File shows vide pre-trial order dated: 18.09.2025 marriage of parties was dissolved whereas vide statement dated: 09.04.2026 plaintiff has withdrawn from remaining prayers before learned link judge. In circumstances there remains no prayer/cause on which the case in hand be proceeded. The matter is disposed of accordingly. Order passed on order sheet. |
|
| 9 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 51/2025 | Sartaj Ali VS Mst khushboo | Hamid Ali Chandio(ADVO-333-SBC-DDU) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-Application U/S 7 & 10 of Guardian & Ward Act,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 (For Custody) | G & W Application called. Applicant absent, his counsel present. Opponent and her counsel are present. Counsel for application filed adjournment application, order passed on it. Put off to 29.4.2026 for cross examination of applicant. |
||
| 10 | F.S. (Family Suits) 221/2025 | Mst Khshboo VS Sartaj Ali | Insaf Ahmed (ADVO-730-SBC-DDU) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Family Suit called. Plaintiff and her counsel Mr. Insaf Ali Solangi are present. Defendant called absent, his counsel Mr. Aqib Chandio present and requested for adjournment, which granted. Put off to 29.4.2026 for defendant side evidence and depositing interim maintenance Rs.5000/- by the defendant. |
||
| 11 | F.S. (Family Suits) 310/2025 | Mst Kubra VS FAthe Muhammad Chandio | Hamid Ali Chandio(ADVO-333-SBC-DDU) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family suit called. Plaintiff is called absent whereas, her counsel is called present. Defendant and his counsel are present. Defendant submits that he is ready to return the dowry articles to plaintiff whatever is lying at his house. The plaintiff to her counsel is directed to appear in person for such amicable settlement. Learned counsel for defendant withdraws the application filed U/O 7 rule 11 CPC. Order on it. The application is dismissed as withdrawn. Put off to 21.04.2026 for evidence of plaintiff side. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Post-Trial | |||||||
| 12 | F.S. (Family Suits) 271/2025 | Mst Waheeda VS Nazeer Ahmed Daryani | Abid Hussain Kalhoro(ADVO-905-SBC-DDU) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family suit called. Plaintiff is called present, her counsel is called absent. Defendant is called absent whereas his counsel is present. Same was the position on last date of hearings. Plaintiff present in count prays that defendant is not inclined for talks and her suit may be decreed. Resultantly, the post-trial talks are declared has failed. Put off to 29.04.2026 for arguments. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 13 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 11/2026 | Mst Khatoon VS The Public at Large and others | Saeed Ahmed(ADVO-520-SBC-DDU) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-Application U/S 7 & 10 of Guardian & Ward Act,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 (For Custody) | G & W application called. Applicant is present; his counsel present. Opponent Javed is present and filed affidavit in favour of applicant, which taken on record. Counsel for applicant filed application u/o 32 R 3 CPC, order passed on it; Notice to proposed guardian. Copy supplied. Put off to 21.4.2026 for objections on application under order 32 Rule 3 CPC and arguments. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Compliance | |||||||
| 14 | G.W. (G&W Cases) 34/2022 | Mst: Raheela VS Rajib Ali Channa | Abdul Rasheed(ADVO-745-SBC-DDU) | Imtiaz Ali Panhwar (ADVO-814-SBC-DDU) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 10,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 (For Custody),The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 7 | G & W Application called. Mst Raheela Channa called absent, her father produced minor. Opponent Rajib Ali Chana called absent, his counsel Present and filed application for adjournment, order passed on it. Meeting not held. Opponent to pay the fair amount of this date on next date of hearing. To come up on 18.5.2026 for meeting and maintenance/ compliance. |
|
| 15 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 20/2025 | Mst Kalsoom VS Azhar Ali Abro | Ayaz Ali (ADVO-761-SBC-DDU) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | Family Execution-Execution Application | Family execution application called. Applicant and her counsel are called absent. No intimation received. File shows the applicant was directed to provide details of property own by J.D but since last 17 date of hearings neither applicant or her counsel appear nor she has provided details of property. In the interest of justice last chance extended to applicant. Put off to 29.04.2026 for appearance of applicant and compliance. |
|
| 16 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 44/2025 | Mst Hajani VS Waheed Ali | Noor Hussain (ADVO-940-SBC-DDU) | Family Execution-Execution Application | Family Execution Application called. Plaintiff/DH called absent. J.D called absent, one Zulfiquar appeared and deposited Rs.24000/- on behalf of J.D, such receipt issued to him. Put off to 13.5-2026 for compliance. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Exparte Evidence | |||||||
| 17 | F.S. (Family Suits) 4/2026 | Mst Asima VS M-Hanif Janweri | Liaquat Ali(ADVO-434-SBC-DDU) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Family suit called. Plaintiff alongside her counsel is called present. Defendant is called absent and he already declared exparte. Counsel for plaintiff filed affidavits of plaintiff and her witness Mst. Zakia, they both re-called and re-affirmed on oath at Ex. 03 & 04. Counsel for plaintiff filed side close statement at Ex.05. Put off to 29.4.2024 for arguments. |
|
| 18 | F.S. (Family Suits) 1/2026 | Mst Sughfta VS Ali Hassan | Muhammad Azam(ADVO-679-SBC-DDU) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Family suit called. Plaintiff along-side is called present. Defendant is called absent and has already been declared ex-parte. Heard and perused. The suit of plaintiff is decreed ex-parte. Khulla granted. Judgment passed and announced in open court. Let the decree be prepared. |
||