| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | PPC 13/2026 | The State VS Abdul Hussain and others | Zulfiqar Ali(ADVO-375-SBC-DDU) | Muhammad Azam(ADVO-679-SBC-DDU) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-506-B | 1/2026 Faridabad |
Criminal case called. Accused 01- Abdul Hussain, 02- Wajid @ Wajib and 03- Niaz Hussain and 04- Majeed are present on bail. while accused Ali Haider, Sikandar and Rajib are declared P.Os. The ADPP for the state is present. counsel for accused called absent. Accused Niaz Hussain filed application for adjournment application, order passed on it; Granted. Complainant and PW Muhammad Siddique are present and filed application for adjournment, which is granted. Put off to 17.6.2026 for evidence. Present accused are directed to attend. Complainant and P.W also directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Supply of Copies | |||||||
| 2 | PPC 34/2026 | The State VS Mazhar Chandio and others | Zulfiqar Ali(ADVO-375-SBC-DDU) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-504 | 24/2026 Faridabad |
Case called. Accused namely Mazhar, Ali Nawaz, Ibrahim @ Muhammad Ibrahim, shah Nawaz, Ghulam Qadir, Rakhial @ Allah Rakhio, Deedar and Murtaza @ Ghulam Murtaza are present in court on bail. The learned ADPP for the state present. Counsel for accused Manzhar Mr. Saeed Panhwar called absent. Copies of case papers supplied to accused; such receipt obtained at Ex.01. To come up on 29.6.2026 for charge. Accused are directed to attend. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 3 | PPC 29/2026 | The State VS Ali Gohar and others | Zulfiqar Ali(ADVO-375-SBC-DDU) | PPC-337-Fi,PPC-440,PPC-504 | 4/2026 Nau Goth |
Case called. Accused Ali Gohar, Shah Nawaz and Rabnawaz are present on bail. While accused Rajib declared P.O. Complainant is present. ADPP for the State is present. Charge framed upon the accused person at Ex.5, they pleaded not guilty and claimed trial, vide their pleas at Ex.05/A to 05/C. Put off to 17.06.2026 for evidence. Issue summons to P.Ws. Present accused are directed to attend. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Statement of Accused | |||||||
| 4 | PPC 52/2025 | The state VS Ali Lashari & otehrs | Zulfiqar Ali(ADVO-375-SBC-DDU) | Hamid Ali Chandio(ADVO-333-SBC-DDU) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8 | 26/2025 Faridabad |
Case called. Accused Ali Lashari and Khadim Hussain present on bail. learned counsels for accused are present. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Statement of accused recorded at Ex.14 to 16. Put off to 02.7.2026 for final arguments. Present accused are directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For U/S 87 Cr. P.C | |||||||
| 5 | DC (Direct Complaint) 19/2025 | Imdad Ali Bughio VS Faqeer Muhammad and others | Abdul Rasheed(ADVO-501-SBC-DDU) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-Fi,PPC-504 | / |
Criminal direct complaint called. Complainant alongside his counsel called absent. Accused Faqeer Muhammad and Farooque Ali present on bail. counsel for accused Mr Sadam Hussain Gilal is present. While accused each Ashaz, Nek Muhammad and Ameen are absconders. Proceedings under section 87 issued against them returned by the process server, order passed on it; Let the statement of process server be recorded. His statement recorded at Ex.02, he produced proclamation warrant, public notice, masirnama and his report at Ex.02/A to 02/D. Order passed on it; Accused Ashaz, Nek Muhammad and Ameen are declared proclaimed offenders. Report of 88 Cr.P.C also received from Mukhtiarkar, which taken on recorded at Ex.03. Put off to 29.06.2026 for supply of case papers. Present accused are directed to attend. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For U/S 88 Cr. P.C | |||||||
| 6 | Gambling Act 29/2026 | The state VS Zulifquar Ali and others | Zulfiqar Ali(ADVO-375-SBC-DDU) | Muhammad Azam(ADVO-679-SBC-DDU) | Gambling Act -Section 5-A | 19/2026 Faridabad |
Case called. Accused Zulifquar Ali and Sheeraz Bughio are present on bail. Learned counsel Mr Muhammad Azam Khaskheli for accused Zulfiquar is absent. Accused Hanif is absconder and declared proclaimed offender. The report under section 88 Cr.PC received from Mukhtiarkar Mehar which taken on record at Ex.3. Case papers supplied to present accused persons and such receipt obtained at Ex.04. Put off to 01.7.2026 for charge. Present accused are directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 7 | PPC 40/2026 | The State VS Nadeem Chandio and others | Zulfiqar Ali(ADVO-375-SBC-DDU) | PPC-334,PPC-353,PPC-399,PPC-402 | / |
||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | IIIrd Class Civil Suits 23/2025 |
Mehboob Ali VS Imtiaz Ali and others | Muhammad Saleem Thebo(ADVO-819-SBC-DDU) | Suit called. Plaintiff called absent, his counsel Mr. Muhammad Saleem is present. Defendants called absent their counsel Mr. Azizullah Buriro is absent, his clerk is present. Counsel for plaintiff filed statement to withdraw the suit, order passed; Suit dismissed as withdrawn. |
|||
| 2 | IInd Class Civil Suits 3/2026 |
Nadeem Dayo VS Munwar Ali | Muhammad Saleem Thebo(ADVO-819-SBC-DDU) | ||||
| 3 | IInd Class Civil Suits 4/2026 |
Lal Chand VS Muhammad Usman Janwari | Hamid Ali Chandio(ADVO-333-SBC-DDU) | ||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Compliance | |||||||
| 1 | F.S. (Family Suits) 34/2024 | Mst:Soniyan Bhatti VS Yaseen Ali Bhatti | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | ||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 2 | F.S. (Family Suits) 100/2026 | Mst Sohni VS Mashooque Chandio | Aaqib Khan (ADVO-50224-SBC-DDU) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | |||
| 3 | F.S. (Family Suits) 123/2026 | Mst Fozia VS Nabi Bux Mirbahr | Amjad Hussain(ADVO-356-SBC-DDU) | Family Suit-Suit for Jactitation of Marriage | |||
| 4 | F.S. (Family Suits) 122/2026 | Mst Naima Khatoon VS Aslam Chandio | Abid Ali(ADVO-320-SBC-DDU) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | |||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 5 | F.S. (Family Suits) 73/2026 | Mst Nimani VS Haji Boro | Abdul Rasheed(ADVO-501-SBC-DDU) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | |||
| 6 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 27/2026 | Mst Zareena VS Mst Mehak | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-Application U/S 7 & 10 of Guardian & Ward Act,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 (For Custody) | |||
| 7 | F.S. (Family Suits) 112/2026 | Mst Murak VS Waseem Khaskheli | Jawaid Ali(ADVO-747-SBC-DDU) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | |||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Pre-Trial | |||||||
| 8 | F.S. (Family Suits) 51/2026 | Mst Shahzadi VS Muhammad Ramzan | Qalander Bux(ADVO-432-SBC-DDU) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | |||
| 9 | F.S. (Family Suits) 67/2026 | Abdul Sattar VS Mst Murak and others | Zahid Ali(ADVO-321-SBC-DDU) | Family Suit-Suit for recovery of Gold Ornaments | |||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 10 | F.S. (Family Suits) 25/2026 | Mst Benazir VS Suhbat Zardari | Rana Ali Muhammad (ADVO-50431-SBC-DDU) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | |||
| 11 | F.S. (Family Suits) 59/2026 | Mst Sumeera VS Nawab Khan Chandio | Aaqib Khan (ADVO-50224-SBC-DDU) | Ali Najaf Memon(ADVO-654-SBC-DDU) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | ||
| 12 | F.S. (Family Suits) 66/2026 | Mst Akhtiryan VS Sadaruddin Khan | Abdul Waheed(ADVO-947-SBC-DDU) | Insaf Ali(ADVO-949-SBC-DDU) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | ||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Meeting | |||||||
| 13 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 18/2025 | Yaseen VS Mst Soniya | Asadullah (ADVO-759-SBC-DDU) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 12 | |||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Exparte Evidence | |||||||
| 14 | F.S. (Family Suits) 84/2026 | Mst Shazia VS Sadaquat Jhatial | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | |||