| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Compliance | |||||||
| 1 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 1378/2025 | The State VS Gulab s/o Muhammad Sharif | Suhail Qurban (ADVO-22329-SBC-KHE) | SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (I) A | 536/2025 Azizabad |
Case called. Accused is absent and his counsel already submit intimation that accused has been arrested in other case. Order passed. Call report. ADPP is present. Witness called absent. Issue B.Ws to remaining P.Ws. Case is adjourned to 03.10.2026, for Evidence |
|
| 2 | PPC 1443/2025 | The State VS Gulab s/o Muhammad Sharif | Suhail Qurban (ADVO-22329-SBC-KHE) | PPC-324,PPC-353 | 535/2025 Azizabad |
Case called. Accused is absent and his counsel already submit intimation that accused has been arrested in other case. Order passed. Call report. ADPP is present. Accused Himmat is present. Witness called absent. Issue B.Ws to remaining P.Ws. Case is adjourned to 03.10.2026, for Evidence |
|
| 3 | Illegal Dispos. Act (Illegal Dispossesion Act) 99/2026 | Muhammad Nadeem & Other VS Zeeshan Rustam & Others | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 5 | / |
Matter is called, Counsel for applicant is present and report is received from police unserved. Matter is adjourned to 29.09.2026 for call report from police super market |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Report | |||||||
| 4 | Illegal Dispos. Act (Illegal Dispossesion Act) 103/2026 | Muhammad Arshad VS ASI Ali Nawaz others | / |
Matter is called, Counsel for petitioner is present and submit application for adjournment. Order passed. Counsel for respondents side present. Call detail report from Police. Put off to 03.10.2026 for call report from police |
|||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 5 | SC (Murder Trial) 1634/2024 | The State VS Rameez, Wasif Bilal, Ali Nazeer | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-LRK) | Qadeer Ahmed(ADVO-15045-SBC-KHE) | PPC-302 | 438/2024 N.K.Ind. Area |
Bail is called, Counsel for accused and ADPP are present. Bail is adjourned to 22.09.2026 for call complainant |
| 6 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 2477/2026 | Usama Jaleel VS The State | Cr.PC-497 | 325/2026 Gulbahar |
Heard the arguemnts both side. Bail of accused is granted subject to furnishing solvent surety in sum of Rs.50,000/- and P.R bond in the like amount for the satisfaction of the learned trial Court.?? |
||
| 7 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 2454/2026 | Irfan VS State | / |
||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 8 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 2161/2026 | Muhammad Musharraf s/o Muhammad Azhar VS The State | Asjad Faridi(ADVO-24790-SBC-KHC) | Cr.PC-498 | 395/2026 Sir Syed |
Applicant/accused Muhammad Musharraf is present on interim pre arrest bail. Counsel for the applicant/accused is present. ADPP is present. Complainant along with counsel are present. Heard the arguments on bail. Order passed in court. bail application of applicant/ accused named above merits no consideration and same is hereby dismissed??accordingly and interim bail granted to him vide order dated: 10.08.2026 is hereby recalled. Let such intimation be sent to the learned trial Court as well as SHO concerned for information. The above observations are in tentative assessment and will not prejudice the case of either side during trial |
|
| 9 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 2304/2026 | Abdul Samad Sultan VS The State | Cr.PC-498 | 5/2026 Sharifabad |
Bail is called. Accused is present on interim bail and his Cousnel for accused is present. ADPP for state is present. Complainant side absent. Bail is adjourned to 18.09.2026 for hearing on bail and call police file and IO and complainant |
||
| 10 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 2393/2026 | Muzammail S/O Shafiq VS The State | Cr.PC-498 | / |
Bail is called. Accused is present on interim bail and his Cousnel for accused is present. ADPP for state is present. Complainant side absent. Bail is adjourned to 15.09.2026 for hearing on bail and call police file and accused directed to join for investigation as last chance |
||
| 11 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 2399/2026 | Muhammad Naveed VS The State | Cr.PC-498 | / |
Bail is called. Accused is present on interim bail and his Cousnel for accused is present. ADPP for state is present. Complainant side absent. Bail is adjourned to 14.09.2026 for hearing on bail and call police file and accused directed to join for investigation |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Hearing | |||||||
| 12 | PPC 778/2026 | The State VS Maroof Shah S/O Zara | 130/2026 Rizvia Society |
Case is called, Accused Maroof is present on bail and Counsel for complainant and DC for accused and ADPP for state are present. Case is adjourned to 30.09.2026 for charge and call police file and hearing on cancellation of bail of accused |
|||
| 13 | Illegal Dispos. Act (Illegal Dispossesion Act) 100/2026 | Muhammad Yaseen s/o Muhammad Ashraf VS Sher Ali & Others | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3/4 illegal Dispossession Act | / |
Matter is called, At request of counsel for applicant. Put off to 03.10.2026 for hearing |
||
| 14 | DC (Direct Complaint) 107/2026 | The State VS Zahid Rasheed | / |
Matter is called, Counsel for applicant is present and At request of applicant counsel. Put off to 1.10.2026 for hearing |
|||
| 15 | Cr.M.A. (Criminal Misc. Applications) 220/2026 | Mst Summaya Javed VS State | Kamran Ali(ADVO-24787-SBC-KHS) | 298/2024 Sir Syed |
Heard applicant. Learned counsel for the applicant/accused reiterated almost same facts as mentioned in the memo of Cr. Misc. application. However; he has emphasis on the ground that the door of liberty were opened for the applicant through the bail order, but the heavy surety condition has prevented her from crossing them. He further contented that the applicant is a woman facing the criminal process without financial strength or influential support. The present application is not founded upon convenience but upon genuine helplessness and the continuing deprivation of her liberty, therefore, he has prayed to reduce the surety amount. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 16 | PPC 980/2023 | State VS Abid & Others | Muhammad Mufizuddin(ADVO-7977-SBC-KHE) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-392,PPC-397 | 135/2021 Bilal Colony |
Case called. Accused Bilal is produced by central J/A DC for accused is absent. Complaianant is present. Witness are present. ADPP present. Case is adjourned to 26/09/2026 for evidence and issue BWs against remaining witnesses |
| 17 | 23 Arms Ordinance 923/2023 | The State VS Farhan @ Balla Son Of Sultan | Abdul Nasir Shaikh(ADVO-4665-SBC-KHC) | SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (I) A | 1141/2022 N.K.Ind. Area |
Case called. Accused Farhan is produce in custody in central jail on line in zooming and His counsel is present and ADPP and are present. Witnesses are absent. Side closed by ADPP. Case is adjourned to 21.09.2026 for statement of accused |
|
| 18 | SC (Murder Trial) 727/2023 | The State VS Farhan S/o Sultan Ahmed | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI) | PPC-302 | 313/2022 Gulbahar |
Case Called. Accused Farhan is produce in custody in central jail on line in zooming and His counsel is present and ADPP and are present. Witnesses are absent. Case is adjourned to 21.09.2026 for evidence and evidence and issue NBW against remaining witnesses |
|
| 19 | SC (Murder Trial) 922/2023 | The State VS Farhan | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-KHI) | PPC-302 | 1125/2022 N.K.Ind. Area |
Case called, Accused Farhan ist produce in custody in central jail on line in zooming and Accused Faraz is present. DC for accused Farhan present and ADPP is present. Witness Dr Sri Chand is present and his evidence recorded on line and side closed by ADPP. Case is adjourned to 21.09.2026 for statement of accused |
|
| 20 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 903/2023 | The State VS S.Bilal Hyder | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-KHI) | Control of Narcotic Substances Act -9B | 316/2023 Liaquatabad |
Case called. Accused is present late and his Cousnel is present. ADPP for state is present. Witnesses are absent. Case is adjourned to 29.09.2026 for evidence and issue NBW against remaining witnesses |
|
| 21 | SC (Murder Trial) 2463/2023 | The State VS Shehzad & oth | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-KHI) | Waqas Rehman(ADVO-23912-SBC-MLR) | PPC-302,PPC-34 | 255/2023 Liaquatabad |
Case is called. Accused Shehzad and Ghazala are present. DC for both accused and ADPP present. Witness called absent. Case is adjourned to 21.09.2026 for Evidence and Issue NBWs against all remaining PW's through SSP and call MLO |
| 22 | PPC 2599/2023 | The State VS Rehan | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-KHI) | PPC-397,PPC-411,PPC-413 | 197/2023 Bilal Colony |
Case called, Accused is not produced in custody by central jail on line and Issue production order of accused to jail to produce custody on line. DC is absent and ADPP Present. Complaianant is present and Witness are absent. Case is adjourned to 26.09.2026 for evidence and issue NBWs against remaining witnesses. |
|
| 23 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 15/2024 | The State VS Qasim Mehmood | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-KHI) | Control of Narcotic Substances Act -9A | 337/2023 Gulbahar |
Case is called, Accused Qasim is present on bail. ADPP is present. Witnesses are absent. Case is adjourned to 19.10.2026 for evidence and issue BWs against witnesses |
|
| 24 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 405/2024 | State VS Imran alias Immo | Shakeel Ahmed(ADVO-7820-SBC-KHW) | Shahraz Gul (ADVO-51623-SBC-KHC) | Special Case Narcotics -9(1) 3 (a) | 407/2024 N.K.Ind. Area |
Case called, Accused Imran is called absent. ADPP for state is present. Case is adjourned to 20.10.2026 for compliance and issue NBW against accused and notice to surety |
| 25 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 460/2024 | State VS Naveed Ahmed | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-LRK) | Special Case Narcotics -9(1) 3 (a) | 135/2024 S.I.U. Karachi Central |
Case called. Accused Issue NBW against accused and notice to surety. DC for accused and ADPP for state are present. Case is adjourned to 20..10.2026 For compliance |
|
| 26 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 1924/2024 | The State VS Suleman | Muhammad Arif Sitai(Suspend) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI) | Sindh Arms Act 2013-23-i-A | 607/2024 N.K.Ind. Area |
Case called, Accused is produced in custody by central jail on line and DC and ADPP Present. Witness are absent. Case is adjourned to 26.9.2026 for evidence and issue NBWs against remaining witnesses. |
| 27 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 2061/2024 | The State VS Muhammad Siraj | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-LRK) | SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (i) (a) | 540/2024 Sh. Noor Jehan |
Case called. Accused called absent. Witnesses are absent. Issue NBW against accused and notice to surety. Case is adjourned to 19.10.2026 For compliance |
|
| 28 | PPC 49/2025 | State VS Suleman | Muhammad Arif Sitai(Suspend) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI) | PPC-324,PPC-353 | 606/2024 N.K.Ind. Area |
Case called, Accused Suleman is produced in custody by central jail on line and DC is absent and ADPP Present. Witness are absent. Case is adjourned to 26.09.2026 for evidence and issue NBWs against remaining witnesses. |
| 29 | SC (Murder Trial) 53/2025 | State VS Kamran Ghouri | Muhammad Arif Sitai(Suspend) | PPC-302 | 403/2024 Bilal Colony |
Case called, Accused is produced in custody by central jail on line and DC for accused is absent. Complaianant is absent. Other Witnesses are absent. ADPP for state is present. Case is adjourned to 26.09.2026 for evidence and issue NBWs against remaining witnesses. |
|
| 30 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 63/2025 | State VS Ibrahim | Muhammad Arif Sitai(Suspend) | Special Case Narcotics -9(1) 3 (a) | 621/2024 Liaquatabad |
Case called. Accused Ibrahim is present on bail late. DC for accused and ADPP is present. Issue B.Ws against the remaining P.Ws. Case is adjourned to 14.10.2026, for Evidence. |
|
| 31 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 380/2025 | The State VS M.Naveed | SPP(ADVO-003-SBC-KHI) | Ihsan Ali (ADVO-22633-SBC-KHS) | Control of Narcotic Substances Act -9C | 57/2025 S.I.U. Karachi Central |
Case called. Accused is not produced in custody by central jail on line and call custody on line. ADPP for state is present and DC for accused present and submit application for adjournment. Order passed. Witness IO SI Raza is present. and Issue NBW against the witnesses through SSP. Hearing 19.09.2026 |
| 32 | PPC 780/2025 | The State VS M.Shafiq / M.Abbas | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-KHI) | PPC-392,PPC-397 | 119/2025 Sharifabad |
Matter called. Accused are not produce in custody by jail on line. Call custody by jail on line. Their counsel and ADPP are present. Issue NON Bailable warrant against remaining witnesses through IO. ADPP for state is present and request for time for produce the witnesses. Request is allowed. Cased is adjourned to 24.09.2026 for evidence |
|
| 33 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 514/2025 | The State VS Dur Bibi | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI) | Special Case Narcotics -U/s 9(i) (Sr.No.06)-a Amendment SCNS Act-2024 | 5/2025 Excise Karachi Central |
Case called, Accused Mst. Dur Bibi is not produce in custody from Women Jail, Karachi and DC for accused and ADPP present. Witnesses PI Rasool and Kamran are present and their cross examined. Side closed by ADPP> Case is adjourned to 17.09.2026, for statement of accused Dur Bibi and issue NBW against absconder accused Innaytullah, Muhamamd Akram Baloch, Seema Muhamamd Akram and Sajied Bux |
|
| 34 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 547/2025 | The State VS Gul Nawab | Muhammad Anis-ur-Rehman(ADVO-8356-SBC-KHC) | Kamran Asghar (ADVO-18430-SBC-KHW) | Control of Narcotic Substances Act -9C | 164/2025 S.I.U. Karachi Central |
Custody of accused Gul Nawab is produced through video link from Central Jail, Karachi on line. DC for accused is present and ADPP is present. P.Ws Akbar and Mubashir are present and bound to appear. Issue summons to all P.Ws. Call case property and chemical examiner report and USB through SSP. Case is adjourned to 17.09.2026, for Evidence |
| 35 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 542/2025 | The State VS Abu Bakar Siddique | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-KHI) | Special Case Narcotics -U/S 9(2)-2-CNS | 9/2025 Excise Karachi Central |
Matter called. Accused are not produce in custody by jail on line. Call custody by jail on line. Their counsel and ADPP are present. Issue NON Bailable warrant against remaining witnesses through IO. ADPP for state is present and request for time for produce the witnesses. Request is allowed. IO of this case is present and submit application for time. Order passed. Cased is adjourned to 24.09.2026 for evidence |
|
| 36 | SC (Murder Trial) 24/2026 | The State VS Kamran Hussain & Another | Mohammad Hussain(ADVO-22389-SBC-KHS) | PPC-302 | 474/2025 Gulberg |
Case called, Accused is produced by the central J/A and DC for accused and ADPP are present. Witnesses PC Siraj is present and bound to appear and case property is not present. Case is adjourned to 16.09.2026 for Evidence and Issue Process/NBW against remaining witness and call case property |
|
| 37 | PPC 1409/2025 | The State VS Adil & Others | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-LRK) | Zubair Ahmed (ADVO-21199-SBC-KHC) | PPC-324,PPC-353 | 406/2025 Rizvia Society |
Case called, Accused Maroof is present and Accused Adil Sahihd and Adil are not produced in custody by landhi jail on line and Call custody on line. Witnesses HC Saeed and PC Noma and ADPP for state is Present. Case is adjourned to 26.09.2026 for evidence and issue BW against witnesses |
| 38 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 117/2026 | The State VS Ismatullah s/o Ramzan Muhammad | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-KHI) | Tariq Mahmood(ADVO-4732-SBC-KHC) | Special Case Narcotics -9(1) 3(c) | 80/2026 N.K.Ind. Area |
Cased is called. Accused is produce in custody by central jail on line and DC for accused is present and ADPP present. Witnesses are absent. IO is present and submit application for time. Order passed. Case is adjourned to 17.09.2026 for evidence and issue process against witnesses through SSP and hearing US 265-K |
| 39 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 154/2026 | The State VS Shahbaz s/o Sarfaraz Hussain | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-LRK) | Shakil Ahmed(ADVO-5790-SBC-KHS) | Special Case Narcotics -9(1) 3(c) | 202/2026 Super Market |
Case called. Custody of accused Shahbaz is produced through video link from Central jail, Karachi on line. ADPP and D.C are present. Witness SI Salamt is present and his evidence recorded. Issue summons to P.Ws through SIO and SSP. Call case property/police case papers. Case is adjourned to 21.09.2026, for Evidence |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 491 | |||||||
| 40 | Habeas Corpus 323/2026 | Khadija Bano VS SHO | / |
Matter is called, Applicant side is present. Report received from PS unerved and repeat letter to PS. Put off to 17.09.2026 for call report from PS |
|||
| 41 | Habeas Corpus 324/2026 | Sabir Ali Khan VS SHO Sharifabad | / |
By this order, I intend to dispose of the instant Habeas Corpus Petition filed under Section 491 Cr.P.C on behalf of the applicant/petitioner for recovery of the alleged detenue named above, with the allegation that the detainee has been illegally detained by the respondents/proposed accused persons.???????????? On receipt of this petition, the Station House Officer, P.S Sharifabad, Karachi was directed to make all possible efforts for recovery of the alleged detenue and to produce him before this Court.???????????????????? In compliance thereof, the police contacted Asif Khan, Respondent/Proposed Accused No.1 at his given address. Subsequently, the said respondent appeared before the police station along with the alleged detenue Taimoor. Report to that effect has been submitted and is available on record. 4.???????????????????????????????????????? Today, the alleged detenue Taimoor along with Respondent/Proposed Accused No.1 appeared in person. The detenue, in his statement, deposed that he was not illegally confined by Respondent/Proposed Accused No.1. However, he alleged illegal confinement at the hands of the other respondents/proposed accused persons. 5. ?????????????????????????????????????? From the perusal of the record and statement of the detenue, it is evident that the alleged detenue Taimoor is present and is not under illegal detention. He was produced before the police by Respondent/Proposed Accused No.1 himself, therefore, the very purpose of filing the instant Habeas Corpus Petition no longer survives. Accordingly, the instant Habeas Corpus Petition under Section 491 Cr.P.C is hereby dismissed as having become infructuous. However, the alleged detenue shall be at liberty to seek appropriate legal remedy against any person responsible for his illegal confinement, if any, before the competent forum in accordance with law. |
|||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 42 | Cr. Pet. (Criminal Petitions) 1879/2026 | Muhammad Manzoor VS SHO PS.Bilal Colony | Cr.PC-22-A,Cr.PC-22-B | / |
Matter is called, Heard the arguments by applicant side. Detail order passed on separate sheet |
||
| 43 | Cr. Pet. (Criminal Petitions) 2499/2026 | Farhan Ishfaq VS SHO PS.Paposh Nagar | Cr.PC-22-A,Cr.PC-22-B | / |
On last date of hearing viz.31.08.2025 & 02.09.2026 neither applicant appeared nor his counsel appeared; hence in the interest of justice matter adjourned till 12.09.2026. Today i.e.12.09.2026 matter called, neither applicant/petitioner appeared nor his counsel is present till 02:10 PM which shows that applicant/petitioner and his counsel are not interested to proceed the instant Cr. Misc. application, even having the knowledge of pendency of instant petition. However; learned counsel for the proposed accused &?? proposed accused persons are present. In view of above facts & circumstances, this Court has no other option except to dismiss instant Cr. Misc. Application in default for non-prosecution. |
||
| 44 | Cr. Pet. (Criminal Petitions) 2636/2026 | Shoabi Haider VS SHO PS.Samnabad | Cr.PC-22-A,Cr.PC-22-B | / |
Matter is called, Report is received from police. Applicant side is present and heard the arguemnts. Respondent side also present. Order passed in court. The SHO Concerned is directed maintain the peace within their jurisdiction and provide necessary protection to the applicant/petitioner without prejudicing his life & liberty, in accordance with law. However, it is clarified that this order shall not affect any enquiry, complaint, investigation, suit or trial in which if the applicant/ petitioner is party or would be a party that shall be decided on merit in accordance with law. Application in hand disposed of accordingly.???????????????? |
||
| 45 | Cr. Pet. (Criminal Petitions) 2532/2026 | Muhammad Huzaifa Khan VS The SHO OF PS Bilal Colony | Cr.PC-22-A | / |
Matter is called, None is present. Put off to 21.09.2026 for hearing as last chance |
||
| 46 | Cr. Pet. (Criminal Petitions) 2008/2026 | Muhammad Ahmed VS The SHO Of PS Joharabad & Others | Cr.PC-22-A | / |
Heard the arguemnts by applicant side. Order passed in court. SHO may proceed against the applicant/petitioner under Section 182 P.P.C. Application is allowed in above terms. |
||
| 47 | Cr. Pet. (Criminal Petitions) 2462/2026 | Azhar Ali VS SHO PS.Bilal Colony | Cr.PC-22-A,Cr.PC-22-B | / |
Matter is called, Applicant side is present and Matter is adjourned to 21.09.2026 for hearing at request of petitioner side |
||
| 48 | Cr. Pet. (Criminal Petitions) 2815/2026 | Ghulam Murtaza Qureshi VS The SHO Of PS Gulberg & Others | Ghulam Murtaza Qureshi(ADVO-25523-SBC-KHE) | Cr.PC-22-A | / |
Heard the arguments both side. Order passed in court. The instant petition under Sections 22-A & 22-B Cr.P.C is hereby dismissed accordingly. |
|
| 49 | Cr. Pet. (Criminal Petitions) 2795/2026 | Mst Asma BIBI VS The SHO Of Sir Syed & Others | Cr.PC-22-A | / |
Heard the arguments by applicant side. SHO Concerned is directed maintain the peace within their jurisdiction and provide necessary protection to the applicant/petitioner without prejudicing her life & liberty, in accordance with law. However, it is clarified that this order shall not affect any enquiry, complaint, investigation, suit or trial in which if the applicant/ petitioner is party or would be a party that shall be decided on merit in accordance with law. Application in hand disposed of accordingly |
||
| 50 | Cr. Pet. (Criminal Petitions) 2814/2026 | Muhammad Shabbir VS The SHO Of Ps Liaquatabad & Others | Cr.PC-22-A | / |
Matter is called, Respondents side counsel and Applicant side are present. By consent both side. Matter is adjourned to 16.09.2026 for objection and hearing |
||
| 51 | Cr. Pet. (Criminal Petitions) 2797/2026 | Mst Asia VS The SHO OF PS Rizvia Society & Others | Cr.PC-22-A | / |
Matter is called, Petitioner and Advocate for petitioner are present. Call report from police. Put up to 17-09-2026 |
||
| 52 | Cr. Pet. (Criminal Petitions) 2886/2026 | MS Faryal D/O Tauqeer Hussain VS The SHO Of Ps Kh.Aj.Nagri & Others | Cr.PC-22-A | / |
Matter is called, petitioner side is present. Heard the arguments. Order passed in court. SHO concerned is directed to obtained supplementary M.L and proceed as per law. Application/petition is dispose of accordingly. |
||
| 53 | Cr. Pet. (Criminal Petitions) 3117/2026 | Umm e Habiba VS SHO | / |
Heard the arguments by both side. Order passed. SHO Concerned is directed maintain the peace within their jurisdiction and provide necessary protection to the applicant/petitioner without prejudicing her life & liberty, in accordance with law. However, it is clarified that this order shall not affect any enquiry, complaint, investigation, suit or trial in which if the applicant/ petitioner is party or would be a party that shall be decided on merit in accordance with law. Application in hand disposed of accordingly. |
|||
| 54 | Cr. Pet. (Criminal Petitions) 3049/2026 | Syed Abdul Farhan VS The SHO OF PS KH.AJ.Nagri & Others | Cr.PC-22-A | / |
Matter is called, Report is received from police. Counsel for applicant is present. Proposed accused is present and Mr Yaqoob counsel is present and submit vakaltnama for proposed accused and matter is adjourned to 15.09.2026 for obejction and hearing |
||
| 55 | Cr. Pet. (Criminal Petitions) 3039/2026 | Muhammad Afzal VS The SHO Of Ps Sir Syed & Others | Cr.PC-22-A | / |
Heard the arguemnts both side. Order passed in court. Instant petition under Sections 22-A & 22-B Cr.P.C is hereby dismissed. However, the applicant/petitioner is at liberty to avail any other remedy available to him under the law before the competent forum. |
||
| 56 | Cr. Pet. (Criminal Petitions) 3002/2026 | Muhammad Javed VS The SHO Of PS Bilal Colony & Others | Cr.PC-22-A | / |
Matter is called, Report is received from police. Applicant side is present and submit application for adjournment. Order passed. Mr Nadeem Akram counsel l for proposed accused submit power. Put off to 17.09.2026 for SOC and objection and hearing |
||
| 57 | Cr. Pet. (Criminal Petitions) 3004/2026 | Muhammad Kamran VS The SHO Of PS Gulberg & Others | Cr.PC-22-A | / |
Heard the arguments. Order passed in court. SHO Concerned is directed maintain the peace within their jurisdiction and provide necessary protection to the applicant/petitioner without prejudicing his life & liberty, in accordance with law. However, it is clarified that this order shall not affect any enquiry, complaint, investigation, suit or trial in which if the applicant/ petitioner is party or would be a party that shall be decided on merit in accordance with law. Application in hand disposed of accordingly.?? |
||
| 58 | Cr. Pet. (Criminal Petitions) 2984/2026 | Muhammad Sohail Khan VS The SHO Of Ps Kh.AJ.Nagri & Others | Cr.PC-22-A | / |
Matter is called, Report is received from police. Applicant side is present. Mr Mohsin Ali counsel for proposed accused submit undertaking. Put off to 17.09.2026 for SOC and objection and hearing and power filling |
||
| 59 | Cr. Pet. (Criminal Petitions) 3003/2026 | Aqib VS The SHO Of PS Kh.AJ.Nagri & Other | Cr.PC-22-A | / |
Heard the arguemnts by applicant side. Order passed in court. Application in hand disposed of accordingly |
||
| 60 | Cr. Pet. (Criminal Petitions) 3165/2026 | Naeem VS The SHO Of Ps Azizabad & Others | / |
Heard the arguments by both side. Order passed in court. SHO Concerned is directed maintain the peace within their jurisdiction and provide necessary protection to the applicant/petitioner without prejudicing his life & liberty, in accordance with law. However, it is clarified that this order shall not affect any enquiry, complaint, investigation, suit or trial in which if the applicant/ petitioner is party or would be a party that shall be decided on merit in accordance with law. Application in hand disposed of accordingly. |
|||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Supply of Copies | |||||||
| 61 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 795/2026 | State VS Adil | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-LRK) | 407/2025 Rizvia Society |
Case called. Accused not produce in custody by jail on line and call custody on line. ADPP for state is present. fixed on 26.09.2026 for copy supply |
||
| 62 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 229/2026 | The State VS Salaar s/o Muhammad Qasim | Special Case Narcotics -U/S 9(2)-2-CNS | 379/2026 Liaquatabad |
Case is called, Accused is present on bail late and copies US 265-C supplied to accused as ex-2. Mr Waqas Ali Counsel for the applicant/accused is present and submit vakalt nama and also submit state for joining accused for trail. ADPP is present. Call police case papers. Case is is adjourned to 02.10.2026 for charge |
||
| 63 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 244/2026 | The State VS Moula Bux s/o Andal Channa | Special Case Narcotics -U/S 9(2)-2-CNS | 111/2026 S.I.U. Karachi Central |
Case is called, Accused is produce by central jail on line and copies US 265-C supplied to accused as ex-1. Counsel for accused is present and heard the arguments on bail of accused. ADPP for state is present. Case is adjourned to 23.09.2026 for charge and hearing on bail by ADPP for state and call medical report from jail |
||
| 64 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 245/2026 | The State VS Sakina & Others | Special Case Narcotics -U/S 9(2)-2-CNS | 110/2026 S.I.U. Karachi Central |
Case called. Accused are produce in custody by juvenile jail on line and copies US 265-C supplied to accused as ex-1. Counsel for accused is present and ADPP for state is present. Case is adjourned to 23.09.2026 for charge |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 65 | SC (Murder Trial) 547/2024 | The State VS Naeem s/o Abdul Karim | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI) | PPC-302 | 853/2023 Azizabad |
Case is called. Accused is not produce in custody through video link from landhi jail Call custody on line. ADPP is present. Case is adjourned to 21.09.2026 for charge |
|
| 66 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 189/2026 | The State VS Naeemullah | 188/2026 Gulberg |
Case is called, Accused is present on bail late and charge to accused as ex-2. Counsel for the applicant/accused is present. ADPP is present. Call police case papers. Case is is adjourned to 14.10.2026 for evidence and issue BW against wintnesses |
|||
| 67 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 791/2026 | The State VS Adil | Zubair Ahmed (ADVO-21199-SBC-KHC) | 408/2025 Rizvia Society |
Case is called, Accused Aadil Shahid is not produce in custody by landhi jail and call custody on line. ADPP for state is present. Case is adjourned to 26.09.2026 for charge and call police file |
||
| 68 | PPC 1009/2026 | The State VS Mst.Dua & Others | PPC-302 | 372/2024 Sir Syed |
Case is called, Accused Duaa, Tahir and Tasneem are present on bail and DC for accused is absent. ADPP for state is present. Police file is not present. Case is adjourned to 1.10.2026 for charge and call police file |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Misc. Applications | |||||||
| 69 | Cr. Pet. (Criminal Petitions) 2409/2026 | Hamid Hussain VS SHO PS.Joharabad | Cr.PC-22-A | / |
Petitioner and his counsel are present. Call Station House Officer of Police Station Jouharabad in person. Matter is adjourned and fixed on 17-09.2026 for hearing on contempt application |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Compromise going on | |||||||
| 70 | PPC 2046/2024 | State VS Siraj, Ghulam Panjateen | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-LRK) | Asad Ahsan(ADVO-23859-SBC-KHE) | PPC-302,PPC-393 | 309/2024 North Nazimabad |
Case called. Accused Ghulam and Siraj are called absent. Witnesses are absent. Issue nBW against both acused and notice to sureties. Case is adjourned to 19.10.2026 For compliance and hearing on compromise application |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Execution of NBW | |||||||
| 71 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 1620/2022 | The State VS Mushraff & Oth | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-KHI) | Nadia Ashraf(ADVO-18367-SBC-KHS) | Control of Narcotic Substances Act -9B | 569/2022 N.K.Ind. Area |
Case called. None is present. ??Record shows that accused person(s) jumped the bail, consequently Warrant was/were issued against him/them.?????????? R & P of instant case received to this Court by the order???s of Honourable District & Sessions Judge Karachi Central. From perusal of diary sheet it appears that since long accused person remained absent and warrants were issued and since then instant matter one or the other reason adjourned for same purpose, if the same practice is continued then no fruitful result will be served, hence his bail stands cancelled and surety forfeited.\ As per case law reported in 1987 MLD 1032 Karachi whereby the Honourable Apex Court held that if NBW was issued against accused, then his bail was automatically be cancelled and it is not necessary to issue notice to surety and accused.?? It is, therefore, hereby ordered to keep this case on dormant file and to be reopened as and when accused person (s) is/are arrested or appeared before the Court. Issue perpetual warrant against accused and CNIC???s of accused and his surety ordered to be block till further order. SSP is directed to trace and block the CNIC and SIM cards of above named accused person(s) and his sureties. Office is directed to issue letter to SSP accordingly. |
| 72 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 2342/2022 | The State VS zahid hussain | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Special Case Narcotics -6/9-A | 243/2022 Gulbahar |
Case called. Accused Umeed called absent. ADPP present. Case is adjourned to 15/10/2026 for compliance and issue NBW against accused and notice to surety |
| 73 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 932/2023 | The State VS Aamir Khan S/o Ayaz Mehmood | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-KHI) | Control of Narcotic Substances Act -9C | 219/2023 Paposh Nagar |
Case called, Accused is absent. Case is adjourned to 19.10.2026 for compliance and issue NBW against accused and notice to surety |
|
| 74 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 2666/2023 | The State VS Wajid Ali | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-KHI) | SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (I) A | 328/2023 Haideri Market |
Case called. None is present. ??Record shows that accused person(s) jumped the bail, consequently Warrant was/were issued against him/them.?????????? R & P of instant case received to this Court by the order???s of Honourable District & Sessions Judge Karachi Central. From perusal of diary sheet it appears that since long accused person remained absent and warrants were issued and since then instant matter one or the other reason adjourned for same purpose, if the same practice is continued then no fruitful result will be served, hence his bail stands cancelled and surety forfeited.\ As per case law reported in 1987 MLD 1032 Karachi whereby the Honourable Apex Court held that if NBW was issued against accused, then his bail was automatically be cancelled and it is not necessary to issue notice to surety and accused.?? It is, therefore, hereby ordered to keep this case on dormant file and to be reopened as and when accused person (s) is/are arrested or appeared before the Court. Issue perpetual warrant against accused and CNIC???s of accused and his surety ordered to be block till further order. SSP is directed to trace and block the CNIC and SIM cards of above named accused person(s) and his surety. Office is directed to issue letter to SSP accordingly. |
|
| 75 | PPC 2667/2023 | The State VS Wajid Ali | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-KHI) | PPC-397 | 326/2023 Haideri Market |
Case called. None is present. ??Record shows that accused person(s) jumped the bail, consequently Warrant was/were issued against him/them.?????????? R & P of instant case received to this Court by the order???s of Honourable District & Sessions Judge Karachi Central. From perusal of diary sheet it appears that since long accused person remained absent and warrants were issued and since then instant matter one or the other reason adjourned for same purpose, if the same practice is continued then no fruitful result will be served, hence his bail stands cancelled and surety forfeited.\ As per case law reported in 1987 MLD 1032 Karachi whereby the Honourable Apex Court held that if NBW was issued against accused, then his bail was automatically be cancelled and it is not necessary to issue notice to surety and accused.?? It is, therefore, hereby ordered to keep this case on dormant file and to be reopened as and when accused person (s) is/are arrested or appeared before the Court. Issue perpetual warrant against accused and CNIC???s of accused and his surety ordered to be block till further order. SSP is directed to trace and block the CNIC and SIM cards of above named accused person(s) and his surety. Office is directed to issue letter to SSP accordingly. |
|
| 76 | PPC 2670/2023 | The State VS Adnan | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-KHI) | PPC-34,PPC-392,PPC-397 | 99/2023 Paposh Nagar |
Case called. None is present. ??Record shows that accused person(s) jumped the bail, consequently Warrant was/were issued against him/them.?????????? R & P of instant case received to this Court by the order???s of Honourable District & Sessions Judge Karachi Central. From perusal of diary sheet it appears that since long accused person remained absent and warrants were issued and since then instant matter one or the other reason adjourned for same purpose, if the same practice is continued then no fruitful result will be served, hence his bail stands cancelled and surety forfeited.\ As per case law reported in 1987 MLD 1032 Karachi whereby the Honourable Apex Court held that if NBW was issued against accused, then his bail was automatically be cancelled and it is not necessary to issue notice to surety and accused.?? It is, therefore, hereby ordered to keep this case on dormant file and to be reopened as and when accused person (s) is/are arrested or appeared before the Court. Issue perpetual warrant against accused and CNIC???s of accused and his surety ordered to be block till further order. SSP is directed to trace and block the CNIC and SIM cards of above named accused person(s) and his surety. Office is directed to issue letter to SSP accordingly. |
|
| 77 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 1201/2023 | The State VS Hameed S/o Abdul Wahid | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-KHI) | Control of Narcotic Substances Act -9A | 524/2023 Sh. Noor Jehan |
Case called. None is present. ??Record shows that accused person(s) jumped the bail, consequently Warrant was/were issued against him/them.?????????? R & P of instant case received to this Court by the order???s of Honourable District & Sessions Judge Karachi Central. From perusal of diary sheet it appears that since long accused person remained absent and warrants were issued and since then instant matter one or the other reason adjourned for same purpose, if the same practice is continued then no fruitful result will be served, hence his bail stands cancelled and surety forfeited.\ As per case law reported in 1987 MLD 1032 Karachi whereby the Honourable Apex Court held that if NBW was issued against accused, then his bail was automatically be cancelled and it is not necessary to issue notice to surety and accused.?? It is, therefore, hereby ordered to keep this case on dormant file and to be reopened as and when accused person (s) is/are arrested or appeared before the Court. Issue perpetual warrant against accused and CNIC???s of accused and his surety ordered to be block till further order. SSP is directed to trace and block the CNIC and SIM cards of above named accused person(s) and his surety. Office is directed to issue letter to SSP accordingly. |
|
| 78 | PPC 420/2024 | The State VS 1.Arsalan S/o Rehan, 2.Yaseen S/o Zahid Hussain | Shakeel Ahmed(ADVO-7820-SBC-KHW) | PPC-392,PPC-397 | 21/2024 N.K.Ind. Area |
Case called. None is present for accused Yaseen. Record shows that accused person(s) jumped the bail, consequently Warrant was/were issued against him/them.?????????? R & P of instant case received to this Court by the order???s of Honourable District & Sessions Judge Karachi Central. From perusal of diary sheet it appears that since long accused person remained absent and warrants were issued and since then instant matter one or the other reason adjourned for same purpose, if the same practice is continued then no fruitful result will be served, hence his bail stands cancelled and surety forfeited.\ As per case law reported in 1987 MLD 1032 Karachi whereby the Honourable Apex Court held that if NBW was issued against accused, then his bail was automatically be cancelled and it is not necessary to issue notice to surety and accused.?? It is, therefore, hereby ordered to keep this case on dormant file and to be reopened as and when accused person (s) is/are arrested or appeared before the Court. Issue perpetual warrant against accused and CNIC???s of accused and his surety ordered to be block till further order. SSP is directed to trace and block the CNIC and SIM cards of above named accused person(s) and his surety. Office is directed to issue letter to SSP accordingly. |
|
| 79 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 227/2025 | The State VS Mst Faiza @ Madiha w/o Arif Hussain | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI) | Syed Sajjad Hussain Shah(ADVO-4973-SBC-KHS) | Special Case Narcotics -U/S 9(2)-2-CNS | 402/2024 Gulberg |
Case called. None is present. ??Record shows that accused person(s) jumped the bail, consequently Warrant was/were issued against him/them.?????????? R & P of instant case received to this Court by the order???s of Honourable District & Sessions Judge Karachi Central. From perusal of diary sheet it appears that since long accused person remained absent and warrants were issued and since then instant matter one or the other reason adjourned for same purpose, if the same practice is continued then no fruitful result will be served, hence his bail stands cancelled and surety forfeited.\ As per case law reported in 1987 MLD 1032 Karachi whereby the Honourable Apex Court held that if NBW was issued against accused, then his bail was automatically be cancelled and it is not necessary to issue notice to surety and accused.?? It is, therefore, hereby ordered to keep this case on dormant file and to be reopened as and when accused person (s) is/are arrested or appeared before the Court. Issue perpetual warrant against accused and CNIC???s of accused and his surety ordered to be block till further order. SSP is directed to trace and block the CNIC and SIM cards of above named accused person(s) and his surety. Office is directed to issue letter to SSP accordingly. |
| 80 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 240/2025 | The State VS FATEH KHAN S/O ABDUL SAEED | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | The Control Narcotic Substance (Amended) Act, 2022-9(2)-B | 362/2024 North Nazimabad |
Case called. None is present. ??Record shows that accused person(s) jumped the bail, consequently Warrant was/were issued against him/them.?????????? R & P of instant case received to this Court by the order???s of Honourable District & Sessions Judge Karachi Central. From perusal of diary sheet it appears that since long accused person remained absent and warrants were issued and since then instant matter one or the other reason adjourned for same purpose, if the same practice is continued then no fruitful result will be served, hence his bail stands cancelled and surety forfeited.\ As per case law reported in 1987 MLD 1032 Karachi whereby the Honourable Apex Court held that if NBW was issued against accused, then his bail was automatically be cancelled and it is not necessary to issue notice to surety and accused.?? It is, therefore, hereby ordered to keep this case on dormant file and to be reopened as and when accused person (s) is/are arrested or appeared before the Court. Issue perpetual warrant against accused and CNIC???s of accused and his surety ordered to be block till further order. SSP is directed to trace and block the CNIC and SIM cards of above named accused person(s) and his surety. Office is directed to issue letter to SSP accordingly. |
| 81 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 3808/2024 | The State VS Faisal s/o Muhammad Husssain | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI) | Zuhoor-ul-islam(ADVO-21455-SBC-KHS) | Special Case Narcotics -U/S 9(2)-2-CNS | 518/2024 Nazimabad |
Case called. None is present. ??Record shows that accused person(s) jumped the bail, consequently Warrant was/were issued against him/them.?????????? R & P of instant case received to this Court by the order???s of Honourable District & Sessions Judge Karachi Central. From perusal of diary sheet it appears that since long accused person remained absent and warrants were issued and since then instant matter one or the other reason adjourned for same purpose, if the same practice is continued then no fruitful result will be served, hence his bail stands cancelled and surety forfeited.\ As per case law reported in 1987 MLD 1032 Karachi whereby the Honourable Apex Court held that if NBW was issued against accused, then his bail was automatically be cancelled and it is not necessary to issue notice to surety and accused.?? It is, therefore, hereby ordered to keep this case on dormant file and to be reopened as and when accused person (s) is/are arrested or appeared before the Court. Issue perpetual warrant against accused and CNIC???s of accused and his surety ordered to be block till further order. SSP is directed to trace and block the CNIC and SIM cards of above named accused person(s) and his surety. Office is directed to issue letter to SSP accordingly. |
| 82 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 94/2025 | State VS M.Nawaz, Azhar | Muhammad Arif Sitai(Suspend) | Special Case Narcotics -U/S 9(2)-2-CNS | 68/2025 Nazimabad |
Case called, Accused Azher is absent. Isuue NBW against accused and notice to surety. , while accused Muhammad Nawaz called absent and his counsel called absent. and his counsel is present and submit intimation that accused has been arrested in other case. Order passed. Issue PO for accused. ADPP present. Case is adjourned to 05.10.2026 for compliance |
|
| 83 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 120/2025 | The State VS Muhammad Zahid | Shakeel Ahmed(ADVO-7820-SBC-KHW) | Special Case Narcotics -6/9-B | 154/2025 N.K.Ind. Area |
Case called, Accused called absent. ADPP for state present. Case is adjourned to 20.10.2026 for evidence/compliance and issue NBWs against accused and notice to surety |
|
| 84 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 628/2025 | The State VS Rovaid Qamer | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-KHI) | SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (I) A | 216/2025 New Karachi |
Case called. None is present. ??Record shows that accused person(s) jumped the bail, consequently Warrant was/were issued against him/them.?????????? R & P of instant case received to this Court by the order???s of Honourable District & Sessions Judge Karachi Central. From perusal of diary sheet it appears that since long accused person remained absent and warrants were issued and since then instant matter one or the other reason adjourned for same purpose, if the same practice is continued then no fruitful result will be served, hence his bail stands cancelled and surety forfeited.\ As per case law reported in 1987 MLD 1032 Karachi (Yousuf Mashi V/s The State) whereby the Honourable Apex Court held that if NBW was issued against accused, then his bail was automatically be cancelled and it is not necessary to issue notice to surety and accused.?? It is, therefore, hereby ordered to keep this case on dormant file and to be reopened as and when accused person (s) is/are arrested or appeared before the Court. Issue perpetual warrant against accused and CNIC???s of accused and his surety ordered to be block till further order. SSP is directed to trace and block the CNIC and SIM cards of above named accused person(s) and their sureties. Office is directed to issue letter to SSP accordingly. |
|
| 85 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 252/2026 | The State VS Mehran s/o Fareed | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-KHI) | SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (I) A | 786/2025 New Karachi |
Case called, Accused is absent. ADPP for state present. Case is adjourned to 15.10.2026 for compliance and issue NBW against accused and notice to surety |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 291/2024 |
Dr. Anees ur Rehman S/o Atta Ur Rehman VS Zaheer Ahmed S/o Nawab Khan & others | Muhammad Umar Lakhani(ADVO-10433-SBC-KHS) | C.A Called. Advocate for appellant is present. Counsel for the respondent no. 2 and 3 is also present. None is present for respondent no. 4. Service is held good. Put upto 03.10.2026 for objection |
|||
| 2 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 303/2024 |
Zaheer Ahmed & Asim Ahmed VS Dr. Anees Ur Rehman & Mirza Nishad Baig | Muhammad Ramzan Tabassum(ADVO-7688-SBC-KHS) | C.A Called. Advocate for appellant is present and Counsel for the respondent NO.1 is also present. None is present for respondent no. 2. Service is held good. Put upto 03.10.2026 for objection |
|||
| 3 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 302/2024 |
Zaheer Ahmed & Asim Ahmed VS Dr. Anees Ur Rehman & Mirza Nishad Baig | Muhammad Ramzan Tabassum(ADVO-7688-SBC-KHS) | C.A Called. Advocate for appellant is present and Counsel for the respondent NO.1 is also present. None is present for respondent no. 2. Service is held good. Put upto 03.10.2026 for objection |
|||
| 4 | SMA (SMA (Received from HC)) 111/2025 |
Abdul Qayyum Ansari VS Public at large | Muhammad Kashif Siddiqui(ADVO-9041-SBC-KHC) | Petitioner and Advocate for the petitioner is present. No LRs present. Call remaining reports. Case put off to 19/09/2026 for compliance/hg. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Further Proceedings | |||||||
| 5 | Execution (Execution (Received from HC)) 21/2025 |
Syed Ikram ullah S/o Late Syed Mujeebullah VS Iqbal Ahmed Khan S/o Late Shakeel Ahmed Khan & Others | IN PERSON (SELF)(ADVO-001-SBC-MKS) | Matter called. Advocate for the Applicant is absent Advocate for the Auction purchaser and -1 present. Heard the arguments. Matter is adjourned to 28-09-2026 for Hearing by applicant side |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 6 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 125/2026 |
Riaz Manzoor S/O Muhammad Manzoor Hussain VS Seemab Aziz | Appeal is called, Counsel for appellant is present. Respondent side absent. Put off to 12.10.2026 for hearing and call respondent NO-2 in person |
||||
| 7 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 255/2026 |
Muhammad Faisal Khurshid Siddiqui VS Shahbaz and other | Appeal is called. Advocate for the Applicant is present and none is present for respondent side. Appeal is adjourned to 21-09-2026 for service by pasting on pointation |
||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 8 | Defamation Suits 12/2025 |
Haji Essa S/O Haji Muhammad Ismail VS Haji Abdul Rasheed S/O Haji Ismail | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI) | Suit called, Counsel for defendant is present. Counsel for plaintiff is present and submit application for adjournment. Order passed. Granted as last chance. Matter adjourned to 26.09.2026 for hearing U/O VII Rule 11 CPC and parties appearance |
|||
| 9 | J.M(Received from HC) 29/2020 |
Iqbal Ahmed Khan Through Attorney Zubair Basheer VS Syed Ikramullah & others | Muhammad Amin(ADVO-3055-SBC-KHE) | Matter called. Advocate for the Applicant is absent Advocate for the Auction purchaser and respondent NO-1 present. Heard the arguments. Matter is adjourned to 28-09-2026 for Hearing by applicant side |
|||
| 10 | J.M(Received from HC) 25/2024 |
Mst. Badar Sultana VS Syed Ikram Ullah & others | Naveed Ahmed Khan(ADVO-4739-SBC-KHE) | Matter called. Advocate for the Applicant is absent Advocate for the Auction purchaser and respondent NO-1 present. Heard the arguments. Matter is adjourned to 28-09-2026 for Hearing by applicant side |
|||
| 11 | F.R.A. (First Rent Appeals (F.R.A.)) 84/2026 |
Shahbaz S/O Abdul Ghani VS Muhammad Faisal Khurshid | Rabnawaz(ADVO-13765-SBC-KHW) | Matter is called, Counsel for respondent is present and none is present for applicant side. Put off to 21.09.2206 for hearing |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Hearing of Applications | |||||||
| 12 | Defamation Suits 11/2025 |
Zarina Rashid & others VS 92 News HD & others | Syed Ali Ahmed Zaidi(ADVO-17102-SBC-KHS) | Advocate for plaintiff and defendants are presents. Advocate for defendant is present and submit application for adjournment. Order passed. Adjourned. Put up to 1.10.2026 for Issues and advocate to be heard and hearing U/O 39 |
|||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Succession Miscellaneous Applications | |||||||
| 1 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 97/2024 | Mst. Zofia Akbar Malik VS public at large | Syed Muhammad Iqbal(ADVO-8014-SBC-KHE) | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-278 | None is present. Property verification Reports not received. Issue Show cause Notice. Matter is adjourned to 24.09.2026 for compliance / reports. Issue show cause to concerned for non submission of report / Issue process on pointation publication Nadra report and LRs |
||
| 2 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 331/2024 | Shamim Akhtar Bashir VS Public at large | Zakir Hussain Shamsi(ADVO-18645-SBC-KHC) | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-278 | Counsel for the petitioner is present. Call remaining Nadra, LRS, publication, Property verfication report and NBP reports. Repeat notice to objector. Case put off to 23/09/2026 for compliance |
||
| 3 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 332/2024 | Shamim Akhtar Bashir VS Public at large | Zakir Hussain Shamsi(ADVO-18645-SBC-KHC) | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-278 | Counsel for the petitioner is present. Bank report not received as yet. Repeat notice to objector. Case put off to 23/09/2026 for compliance/hearing/Call report from Bank. |
||
| 4 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 373/2025 | Syed Muhammad Muti-ur-Rehman VS public at large | Liaquat Ali(ADVO-14595-SBC-KHS) | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-278,SUCCESSION ACT 1925-372 | Petitioner counsel is present. Put up to 29.09.2026 for hg/compliance/appearance and call publication and verfication of property (9) and (b) as last chance |
||
| 5 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 414/2025 | Dilshad VS public at large | Muhammad Aqib(ADVO-21442-SBC-KHE) | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-372 | |||
| 6 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 427/2025 | Mst. Mumtaz VS Muhammad Mansoor Khan (Deceased) | Ghulam Akbar(ADVO-19376-SBC-KHE) | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-372 | Petition counsel is present. Put up to 24-09-2026 for call verfication of death certificate and publication and status of LRs and witnesses and report of mukhtiarkar |
||
| 7 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 449/2025 | Syed Rafiq VS Mst. Zaib un Nisa | Hameed Ahmed(ADVO-7953-SBC-KHS) | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-372 | Counsel for the petitioner is present. Put of to 24.09.2026 for call fresh verification report of DSC and death certificate |
||
| 8 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 560/2025 | Sarwar Jehan VS Public at large | In Person() | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-278 | SMA l is called, Counsel for applicant is present. None is present for petitioner side. Petitioner is debarred to file objection. Matter is adjourned to 30.09.2026 for hearing |
||
| 9 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 611/2025 | Athar Mian S/O Asghar Mian VS Public at large | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-278 | SMA Called. and Adv for the Petitioner is present and advocate for respondent is present. Matter is adjourned to 22.09.2026, for appearance and publication, Nadra report and call Mukhtiar report |
||
| 10 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 578/2025 | Hassan Muhammad VS Public at large | Waqas(ADVO-21138-SBC-KHW) | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-278 | |||
| 11 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 82/2026 | Mst. Shumaila Zeeshan W/O Muhammad Zeeshan Khan VS Public at large | Abdul Wahab(ADVO-22494-SBC-KHE) | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-278 | |||