| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Hearing | |||||||
| 1 | Habeas Corpus 311/2026 | Nazia VS SHO P.S NKIA | / |
Matter is called, Petitioner and Counsel for applicant are present and notice against respondent is returned unserved. Order passed on report. Directed to submit fresh address of respondent. Matter is adjourned to 24.09.2026 Late diary Counsel for petitioner is present and submit fresh address of respondent. Order passed. Issue notice against respondent given fresh address |
|||
| 2 | Criminal Revisions 59/2026 | Muhammad Shahid VS Noman | 69/2024 North Nazimabad |
Counsel for applicant is present. Order passed in court. In view of the above, the impugned order dated 14.09.2026 is not sustainable in the eyes of law and is liable to be set aside. ?? Office is directed to communicate the true copy of this order to the concerned learned trial Court for information & compliance. |
|||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 3 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 910/2026 | State VS Abdul Waheed | 294/2026 Super Market |
Case is called, Accused is produce by jail on line from central jail and DC for accused is absent and ADPP for state is present. Witnesses are absent. Case is adjourned to 1.10.2026 for evidence and issue process against witnesses |
|||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 4 | Cr. Pet. (Criminal Petitions) 3078/2026 | Mubashir Sheikh VS THe SHO Of Ps Nazimabad & Others | Cr.PC-22-A | / |
Heard the arguments. Order passed in court. SHO Concerned is directed maintain the peace within their jurisdiction and provide necessary protection to the applicant/petitioner without prejudicing his life & liberty, in accordance with law. However, it is clarified that this order shall not affect any enquiry, complaint, investigation, suit or trial in which if the applicant/ petitioner is party or would be a party that shall be decided on merit in accordance with law. Application in hand disposed of accordingly.?????????? |
||
| 5 | Cr. Pet. (Criminal Petitions) 3168/2026 | Syed Haider Abbas Rizvi VS The SHO Of Samanabad & Others | Cr.PC-22-A | / |
Heard the arguments. Order passed in court. Detail order passed on separate sheet. Application in hand disposed of accordingly.?????? |
||
| 6 | Cr. Pet. (Criminal Petitions) 3248/2026 | Kashif Hussain VS The SHO OF PS Samanabad & Others | Cr.PC-22-A | / |
Matter is called, Report is received from police. Applicant side counsel is present and heard the arguments. Mr Fahim Zia counsel is present and submit vakalatnama for proposed accused. Order passed. Subject to NOC. Counsel for proposed accused received the copy of petition. Matter is adjourned to 23.09.2026 for objection and hearing by proposed accused side |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Supply of Copies | |||||||
| 7 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 949/2026 | The State VS Muhammad Haris s/o Muhammad Asif | SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (i) (a) | 139/2026 Liaquatabad |
Case is called, Accused is not produce by jail on line by jail and call custody on line. ADPP for state is present. Case is adjourned to 21.09.2026 for copy supply |
||
| 8 | PPC 1043/2026 | The State VS Zahoor & Others | PPC-395 | 290/2026 Super Market |
Case is called, All 5 Accused are produce in custody by central jail on line. Copies US 265-C supplied to all accused on line. DC for accused and ADPP for state are present. Case is adjourned to 1.10.2026 for charge |
||
| 9 | PPC 1045/2026 | The State VS Zahoor & Others | PPC-395 | 287/2026 Super Market |
Case is called, All 5 Accused are produce in custody by central jail on line. Copies US 265-C supplied to all accused on line. DC for accused and ADPP for state are present. Case is adjourned to 1.10.2026 for charge |
||
| 10 | PPC 1044/2026 | The State VS Zahoor & Others | PPC-395 | 288/2026 Super Market |
Case is called, All 5 Accused are produce in custody by central jail on line. Copies US 265-C supplied to all accused on line. DC for accused and ADPP for state are present. Case is adjourned to 1.10.2026 for charge |
||
| 11 | PPC 1046/2026 | The State VS Zahoor & Others | PPC-395 | 289/2026 Super Market |
Case is called, All 5 Accused are produce in custody by central jail on line. Copies US 265-C supplied to all accused on line. DC for accused and ADPP for state are present. Case is adjourned to 1.10.2026 for charge |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 12 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 911/2026 | State VS Zahoor | 292/2026 Super Market |
Case is called, Accused is produce by jail on line by central and DC for accused and ADPP for state are present. Case is adjourned to 1.10.2026 for charge |
|||
| 13 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 909/2026 | State VS Gulzar | 295/2026 Super Market |
Case is called, Accused is produce by central jail on line and DC for accused and ADPP for state are present. Case is adjourned to 1.10.2026 for charge and call police file |
|||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Execution of NBW | |||||||
| 14 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 191/2024 | The State VS Owais s/o Abdul rehman | Shakeel Ahmed(ADVO-7820-SBC-KHW) | Special Case Narcotics -6/9-B | 129/2024 Azizabad |
Case called. Accused is called absent without any application. ADPP present. Case is adjourned to 29.09.2026. for compliance and issue NBW against accused and notice to surety |
|
| 15 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 167/2025 | The State VS M.Saeed | Shakeel Ahmed(ADVO-7820-SBC-KHW) | Control of Narcotic Substances Act -9A | 188/2025 New Karachi |
Case called. Accused is called absent without any application. ADPP present. Case is adjourned to 29.09.2026. for compliance and issue NBW against accused and notice to surety |
|
| 16 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 786/2025 | The State VS Hassan Joyia | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI) | SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (I) A | 281/2025 Khuwaja Ajmer Nagri |
Case called. None is present. ??Record shows that accused person(s) jumped the bail, consequently Warrant was/were issued against him/them.?????????? R & P of instant case received to this Court by the order???s of Honourable District & Sessions Judge Karachi Central. From perusal of diary sheet it appears that since long accused person remained absent and warrants were issued and since then instant matter one or the other reason adjourned for same purpose, if the same practice is continued then no fruitful result will be served, hence his bail stands cancelled and surety forfeited.\ As per case law reported in 1987 MLD 1032 Karachi whereby the Honourable Apex Court held that if NBW was issued against accused, then his bail was automatically be cancelled and it is not necessary to issue notice to surety and accused.?? It is, therefore, hereby ordered to keep this case on dormant file and to be reopened as and when accused person (s) is/are arrested or appeared before the Court. Issue perpetual warrant against accused and CNIC???s of accused and his surety ordered to be block till further order. SSP is directed to trace and block the CNIC and SIM cards of above named accused person(s) and his surety. Office is directed to issue letter to SSP accordingly |
|
| 17 | PPC 885/2025 | The State VS Ahmed Nawaz/ Ahmed Kala | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI) | PPC-324,PPC-353 | 399/2025 Sh. Noor Jehan |
Case called. Accused person is called absent without any application or intimation. Case is adjourned to 29.09.2026 for compliance and issue NBW against accused and notice to surety. |
|
| 18 | PPC 1195/2025 | The State VS Muhammad Hassan s/o Jahangir | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI) | PPC-324,PPC-353 | 280/2025 Khuwaja Ajmer Nagri |
Case called. None is present. ??Record shows that accused person(s) jumped the bail, consequently Warrant was/were issued against him/them.?????????? R & P of instant case received to this Court by the order???s of Honourable District & Sessions Judge Karachi Central. From perusal of diary sheet it appears that since long accused person remained absent and warrants were issued and since then instant matter one or the other reason adjourned for same purpose, if the same practice is continued then no fruitful result will be served, hence his bail stands cancelled and surety forfeited.\ As per case law reported in 1987 MLD 1032 Karachi whereby the Honourable Apex Court held that if NBW was issued against accused, then his bail was automatically be cancelled and it is not necessary to issue notice to surety and accused.?? It is, therefore, hereby ordered to keep this case on dormant file and to be reopened as and when accused person (s) is/are arrested or appeared before the Court. Issue perpetual warrant against accused and CNIC???s of accused and his surety ordered to be block till further order. SSP is directed to trace and block the CNIC and SIM cards of above named accused person(s) and his surety. Office is directed to issue letter to SSP accordingly |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Compliance | |||||||
| 1 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 477/2022 | Ashraf Hussain Siddiqui VS public at large | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-278 | None is present. An order passed on pending application which is dismissed for non prosecution |
|||