| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 804/2023 | The State VS Shahnawaz &others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-KHI) | Control of Narcotic Substances Act -9B | 219/2023 Rizvia Society |
Bail is reserved |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Hearing of Applications | |||||||
| 2 | Illegal Dispos. Act (Illegal Dispossesion Act) 95/2026 | Mst.Abida VS SHO PS.Yousuf Plaza & Others | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3/4 illegal Dispossession Act | / |
Matter is called, Applicant and his counsel are present. Report is received from police. Respondents are present. Mr M.Shahid Ch counsel is present and submit vakalat nama for respondents and received the copy of ID. Matter is adjourned to 03.10.2206 for objection and hearing |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 3 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 2363/2026 | Muhammad Ishaq Khan VS The State | Cr.PC-497 | 258/2026 Paposh Nagar |
Bail is called. Counsel for accused is present and heard the arguemnts by ADPP for state. Order passed in court. applicant/accused named above is entitled to bail; as such, bail is granted to accused subject to furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) and P.R bond in the like amount, to the satisfaction of this Court.?????????????????????? |
||
| 4 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 2364/2026 | Muhammad Ishaq Khan VS The State | Cr.PC-497 | 259/2026 Paposh Nagar |
Bail is called. Counsel for accused is present and heard the arguemnts by ADPP for state. Order passed in court. applicant/accused named above is entitled to bail; as such, bail is granted to accused subject to furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) and P.R bond in the like amount, to the satisfaction of this Court.?????????????????????? |
||
| 5 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 2362/2026 | Muhammad Ishaq Khan VS The State | Cr.PC-497 | 260/2026 Paposh Nagar |
Bail is called. Counsel for accused is present and heard the arguemnts by ADPP for state. Order passed in court. applicant/accused named above is entitled to bail; as such, bail is granted to accused subject to furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) and P.R bond in the like amount, to the satisfaction of this Court.?????????????????????? |
||
| 6 | Spl.B.A. (Special Bail Applications) 418/2026 | Faizan & Rashid VS The State | Cr.PC-497 | 529/2026 Liaquatabad |
Bail is called, ADPP for state is present and counsel for accused is present and not pressed this bail. Order passed. Present bail is dismissed as not pressed |
||
| 7 | Spl.B.A. (Special Bail Applications) 419/2026 | Majid Khan Afridi VS The State | Cr.PC-497 | 261/2026 Sh. Noor Jehan |
Bail is called, ADPP for state is present and counsel for accused is present and not pressed this bail. Order passed. Present bail is dismissed as not pressed |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 8 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 2303/2026 | Muhammad Amir Soharwardi VS The State | Cr.PC-498 | 336/2026 Taimoria |
Bail is called. Accused is present on interim bail and his Cousnel Mr Mumtaz Ahmed for accused is present and submit vakaltnam. Order passed. Subject to NIC. ADPP for state is present. Counsel for complaianant is also present. IO is present and submit report and accused is directed to join investigation as last chance. Bail is adjourned to 19.09.2026 for hearing on bail and call police file and IO. |
||
| 9 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 2342/2026 | Syed Rashid Ali VS The State | Cr.PC-498 | 336/2026 Taimoria |
Bail is called. Accused is present on interim bail and his Cousnel for accused is present ADPP for state is present. Counsel for complaianant is also present. IO is present and submit report and accused is directed to join investigation as last chance. Bail is adjourned to 19.09.2026 for hearing on bail and call police file and IO. |
||
| 10 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 2393/2026 | Muzammail S/O Shafiq VS The State | Cr.PC-498 | / |
Bail is called. Accused is present on interim bail and his Cousnel for accused is present. ADPP for state is present. Complainant side absent. Heard the arguements. Order passed. Bail application of applicant/ accused named above merits no consideration and same is hereby dismissed??accordingly and interim bail granted to him vide order dated: 02.09.2026 is hereby recalled. Let such intimation be sent to the learned trial Court as well as SHO concerned for information. |
||
| 11 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 2343/2026 | Muhammad Sameed Ahmed Siddiqui VS The State | Cr.PC-498 | 669/2026 Khuwaja Ajmer Nagri |
Bail is called, Accused is present on interim bail. Heard the arguemnts both side. Order passed in court. The interim pre arrest bail granted to them on dated:??31.08.2026??is hereby confirmed on same terms & grounds. The applicant/accused is directed to join the learned trial Court. The bail application in hand stands allowed accordingly.?? |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Hearing | |||||||
| 12 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 1754/2022 | The State VS Jameel | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-KHI) | Control of Narcotic Substances Act -9C | 581/2022 Haideri Market |
Case called. Accused is present on bail and his DC for accused is present and heard the arguments. ADPP for state are present. Case is adjourned to 28.09.2026 for final arguments by ADPP for state |
|
| 13 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 766/2023 | The State VS Jameel S/o Moosa | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-KHI) | Control of Narcotic Substances Act -9B | 81/2023 Haideri Market |
Case called. Accused is present on bail and his DC for accused is present and heard the arguments. ADPP for state are present. Case is adjourned to 28.09.2026 for final arguments by ADPP for state |
|
| 14 | PPC 3005/2023 | The State VS M.Aslam & others | Sanaullah (ADVO-22150-SBC-KHE),Tufail Ahmed(ADVO-18884-SBC-KHS) | PPC-320 | 448/2023 Nazimabad |
Case called, Accused Aslam and Nadem are present on bail and their counsel is present and counsel for complaianant is present and heard the arguments by ADPP for state. Case is adjourned to 29.09.2026 for Judgment |
|
| 15 | PPC 2058/2024 | State VS Atif, M. Javed | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-393,PPC-394 | 657/2024 Taimoria |
Case called, Accused Atif is present on bail. Accused Javed is not produced in custody by central jail on line. DC for accused is present. ADPP is present. Heard the arguemnts. Judgment passed in court. Accused are acquitted US 265-H(1) Cr.P.C and issue release writ of accused Javed to central jail |
| 16 | Habeas Corpus 311/2026 | Nazia VS SHO P.S NKIA | / |
Matter is called, Counsel for applicant is present and Heard the arguemnts on application for direction to IO/SHO for tracing respondent NO-1. Order passed. Repeat through SHO . Matter is adjourned to 18.09.2026 |
|||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 17 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 341/2023 | The State VS Rizwan | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-KHI) | Control of Narcotic Substances Act -9C | 51/2023 Khuwaja Ajmer Nagri |
Case called, Accused Bilal is not produce in custody by jail on line and call csutody on line. Accused Rizwan absconder. Issue notice US 87 against accused Rizwan. ADPP for state present. Case is adjourned to 28.09.2026 for compliance/evidence and issue process against witnesses |
|
| 18 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 893/2023 | The State VS Nadirullah | Imtiaz Ali(ADVO-14517-SBC-KHE) | Mumtaz Ali (ADVO-2773-SBC-KHP) | Control of Narcotic Substances Act -9B | 312/2023 Nazimabad |
Case called, Accused is not produced in custody by central jail on line and Issue production order of accused to jail to produce custody on line. Pauper DC and ADPP Present. Witness are absent. Case is adjourned to 29.09.2026 for evidence and issue NBWs against remaining witnesses. |
| 19 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 1246/2023 | The State VS M.Aamir Siddiqui S/o Abdul Karim Siddiqui | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-UK) | Control of Narcotic Substances Act -9C | 704/2023 Sir Syed |
Case called, Accused is not produced in custody by central jail on line and DC is present and ADPP Present. Witness Sohail is present and his evidence recorded. Case is adjourned to 29.09.2026 for evidence and issue NBWs against remaining witnesses. |
|
| 20 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 72/2024 | The State VS M.Shan S/o Dilshad | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI) | Control of Narcotic Substances Act -9B | 16/2024 Nazimabad |
Case called, Accused is present. DC for accused and ADPP present. Witnesses are absent. Case is adjourned to 08.10.2026 for evidence and issue NBW against remaining witnesses and call case property |
|
| 21 | PPC 780/2024 | The State VS Nasirullah s/o Azizullah | SPP(ADVO-003-SBC-KHI) | PPC-302 | 251/2023 Jauharabad |
Case called, Accused is not produced in custody by central jail on line and Issue production order of accused to jail to produce custody on line. DC is present and ADPP Present. Witness are absent. Case is adjourned to 29.09.2026 for evidence and issue NBWs against remaining witnesses. |
|
| 22 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 357/2024 | The State VS Sarfaraz | Shakeel Ahmed(ADVO-7820-SBC-KHW) | Special Case Narcotics -6/9-B | 136/2024 Jauharabad |
Case called, Accused is not produced in custody by central jail on line and Issue production order of accused to jail to produce custody on line. DC is absent and ADPP Present. Witness are absent. Case is adjourned to 29.09.2026 for evidence and issue NBWs against remaining witnesses. |
|
| 23 | SC (Murder Trial) 1273/2024 | The State VS Muhammad Ramzan | Muhammad Sarfraz Khan(ADVO-20476-SBC-KHC) | PPC-302 | 277/2024 Sir Syed |
Case called, Accused is not produced in custody by central jail on line and DC for accused is absent and ADPP Present. Witness are absent. Case is adjourned to 29.09.2026 for evidence and issue NBWs against remaining witnesses. |
|
| 24 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 1504/2024 | The State VS Akbar | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-LRK) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Sindh Arms Act 2013-23-i-A | 441/2024 N.K.Ind. Area |
Case Called Accused Akbar is not produce in custody through video link from central jail. His pauper counsel is absent and ADPP for state is present. Case is adjourned to 29.09.2026 for evidence and issue BWs against remaining witnesses |
| 25 | PPC 1471/2024 | The State VS Muhammad Riaz | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-LRK) | PPC-353 | 384/2024 Rizvia Society |
Case is called, Both accused Ghulam and Riaz are present on bail and their counsel and complaianant and counsel for complainant and ADPP for state are present. Witnesses are absent. Case is adjourned to 21/09.2026 for evidence and call police file and IO with police file and issue summons against remaining witnesses and call police file |
|
| 26 | PPC 1662/2024 | State VS Akber, Siraj | Najam Uddin (ADVO-23575-SBC-MLR) | Najam Uddin (ADVO-23575-SBC-MLR) | PPC-324,PPC-353 | 440/2024 N.K.Ind. Area |
Case Called accused namely Siraj is absconder. Co- accused Akbar is n ot produce in custody through video link from central jail on line. His pauper counsel is absent and ADPP for state is present. Case is adjourned to 29.09.2026 for evidence and issue BWs against remaining witnesses |
| 27 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 1860/2024 | The State VS Saifullah | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Sindh Arms Act 2013-23-i-A | 117/2024 Gabol Town |
Case called, Accused is not produced in custody by central jail on line and Issue production order of accused to jail to produce custody on line. ADPP Present. Witness are absent. Case is adjourned to 29.09.2026 for evidence and issue NBWs against remaining witnesses. |
| 28 | PPC 1811/2024 | The State VS Ahsanullah and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-186,PPC-324,PPC-353 | 115/2024 Gabol Town |
Case called. Accused Lala Khan is called absent without any application or intimation. While accused Ahsanullah and Saifullah are not produced by the J/A through video link from central Jail and D/C is absent. Call the surety in person. Case is adjourned to 29.09.2026 for compliance and Issue NBW against accused Lala khan and notice to surety and evidence and issue summons against witnesses |
| 29 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 586/2024 | State VS Hanif Abro | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-LRK) | Qadeer Ahmed(ADVO-15045-SBC-KHE) | Special Case Narcotics -6/9-C | 591/2024 N.K.Ind. Area |
Case called, Accused is not produced in custody by landhi jail on line. DC and ADPP Present. Witness are absent. Case is adjourned to 29.09.2026 for evidence and issue NBWs against remaining witnesses through SSP |
| 30 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 1944/2024 | State VS Naveed Ahmed | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI) | Adnan Rajput(ADVO-22598-SBC-KHE) | SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (I) A | 463/2024 Liaquatabad |
Case called, Accused is not produced in custody by central jail on line and Issue production order of accused to jail to produce custody on line. DC is absent and ADPP Present. Witness are absent. Case is adjourned to 29.09.2026 for evidence and issue NBWs against remaining witnesses. |
| 31 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 1892/2024 | The State VS Stephen | DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-KHP) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Sindh Arms Act 2013-23-i-A | 473/2024 Sh. Noor Jehan |
Case is called, Accused is present on bail. DC for accused and ADPP for state are present. Witnesses are absent. Case is adjourned to 29.09.2026 for evidence and issue BW against remaining witnesses |
| 32 | PPC 2059/2024 | State VS Stephen, Jones | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-324,PPC-353 | 472/2024 Sh. Noor Jehan |
Case called, Accused Jones is not produced in custody by central jail on line and Accused Stephen is present. DC is present and ADPP Present. Witness are absent. Case is adjourned to 29.09.2026 for evidence and issue NBWs against remaining witnesses. |
| 33 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 23/2025 | State VS Wamiq | Noor Ul Ain(ADVO-20307-SBC-KHE) | SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (I) A | 626/2024 Khuwaja Ajmer Nagri |
Case Called, Accused namely Wamiq is absent and his counsel submit application for condonation. Order passed. Condoned. Witnesses are absent. ADPP for state is present. Case is adjourned to 14.10.2026 for evidence and Issue NBW against remaining witnesses and hearing US 265-K |
|
| 34 | PPC 124/2025 | The State VS Wamiq | Noor Ul Ain(ADVO-20307-SBC-KHE) | PPC-353 | 625/2024 Khuwaja Ajmer Nagri |
Case Called, Accused namely Wamiq is absent and his counsel submit application for condonation. Order passed. Condoned. Witnesses are absent. ADPP for state is present. Case is adjourned to 14.10.2026 for evidence and Issue NBW against remaining witnesses and hearing US 265-K |
|
| 35 | PPC 178/2025 | State VS Zaheer Khan | Muhammad Arif Sitai(Suspend) | PPC-279,PPC-320 | 611/2024 Sh. Noor Jehan |
Case is called. Accused is present on bail his counsel and ADPP for state are present. Witnesses are absent. Case is adjourned to 06.10.2026 for evidence and issue NBWs against remaining witnesses through SSP |
|
| 36 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 96/2025 | State VS Naseeb Zar, Abdul Razzaq, Shahzad | Muhammad Arif Sitai(Suspend) | Special Case Narcotics -9(1) 3(b) | 28/2025 Sh. Noor Jehan |
Case called. Accused Shahzad and Razaak are not produced by landhi jail on line and issue letter to produce accused on line. Pauper counsel and ADPP for state present. Witnesses are absent. Case is adjourned to 30.09.2026 for evidence and issue BWs against witnesses and call police file |
|
| 37 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 508/2025 | The State VS Roshan | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-KHI) | Control of Narcotic Substances Act -9C | 236/2025 F.B.I. Area |
Case called. Accused Roshan is present late and his counsel is present and ADPP is present. Issue summons against all the P.Ws through SHO. Call case property. Application under section 516-A Cr.P.C is also fixed for hearing. Case is adjourned to 20.10.2025, for evidence and hearing application U/S.516-A Cr.P.C |
|
| 38 | PPC 1252/2025 | The State VS Taimoor & Another | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI) | PPC-324,PPC-353 | 528/2025 Azizabad |
Case called. Accused present and DC for accused is present and ADPP for state present. Witness HC Illyas is present and his evidence recorded and witness ASI Hashmi si present and his evidence recorded and witness PC Sharaakt is given up by ADPP. Case is adjourned to 30/09/2026 for evidence and issue NBW against remaining witnesses |
|
| 39 | PPC 1293/2025 | The State VS Salah Muhammad | Gul Hassan(ADVO-10552-SBC-MLR) | PPC-324,PPC-353 | 496/2025 Gulberg |
Case called, Accused is not produced in custody by central jail on line and DC is absent and ADPP Present. Witness are absent. Case is adjourned to 30.09.2026 for evidence and issue NBWs against remaining witnesses. |
|
| 40 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 1375/2025 | The State VS Azeem Ali s/o Anwar | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-KHI) | SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (I) A | 59/2025 Azizabad |
Case called. Accused present and DC for accused is present and ADPP for state present. Witness HC Illyas is present and his evidence recorded and witness ASI Hashmi si present and his evidence recorded and witness PC Sharaakt is given up by ADPP. Case is adjourned to 30/09/2026 for evidence and issue NBW against remaining witnesses |
|
| 41 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 583/2025 | The State VS Shahzad Khan | Riaz Ali(ADVO-51006-SBC-KHC) | Special Case Narcotics -9(1) 3(c) | 768/2025 Sh. Noor Jehan |
Case called, Accused is not produced in custody by central jail on line and DC is present . ADPP Present. Witness absent. Case is adjourned to 29.09.2026 for evidence and issue NBWs against remaining witnesses and hearing on bail |
|
| 42 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 586/2025 | The State VS Ahmed Shjah | Afzal Jan (ADVO-50756-SBC-KHS) | Special Case Narcotics -9(1) 3(c) | 364/2025 North Nazimabad |
Case called, Accused Ahmed Shah is called absent and his counsel already submit intimation that accused has been expired. Order passed. Call report from police. Accused Abid is produce in custody by central jail and DC for accused and ADPP for state are present. Witnesses are absent. Case is adjourned to 29.09.2026 for compliance and evidence and call police file and issue process against witnesses |
|
| 43 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 1401/2025 | The State VS Saleh Muhammad | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-KHI) | SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (i) (a) | 497/2024 Rizvia Society |
Case called, Accused is not produced in custody by central jail on line and DC is absent and ADPP Present. Witness are absent. Case is adjourned to 30.09.2026 for evidence and issue NBWs against remaining witnesses. |
|
| 44 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 15/2026 | The State VS Muhammad Muzammil s/o Muhammad Imran | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-LRK) | Special Case Narcotics -9(1) 3(c) | 662/2025 N.K.Ind. Area |
Case called. Accused persons are not produced in custody through video link from central jail, Karachi. ADPP and D.C are present. P.Ws are absent. Issue N.B.Ws to remaining P.Ws. Call case property/police case papers. Case is adjourned to 29.09.2026, for Evidence |
|
| 45 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 127/2026 | The State VS Imran s/o Ikram | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-KHI) | Special Case Narcotics -9(1) 3(c) | 119/2026 N.K.Ind. Area |
Case called, Accused is not produce in custody by J/A on line. DC for accused and ADPP for state are present. Witness absent. Case is adjourned to 24.09.2026 for evidence and further evidence and issue NBWs against witnesses through SSP and hearing on bail |
|
| 46 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 130/2026 | The State VS Akhtar Zaib s/o Anwar Zaib | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-KHI) | Qaim Ali(ADVO-11490-SBC-KHE) | Special Case Narcotics -9(1) 3(c) | 33/2026 F.B.I. Area |
Case called. Accused is not produced in custody through video link from central jail, Karachi on line. ADPP is present and DC is absent. Witnesses are called absent. Case is adjourned to 29.09.2026, for Evidence. |
| 47 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 165/2026 | The State VS Ali Raza & Another | Special Case Narcotics -9(1) 3(b) | 106/2026 Super Market |
Case called, Accused Ali Raza is not produced in custody by central jail on line and Accused Snaju is present on bail and DC and ADPP Present. Witness are absent. Case is adjourned to 29.09.2026 for evidence and issue process against witnesses |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 48 | Cr. Pet. (Criminal Petitions) 2937/2026 | Mst Tania VS The SHO Of Ps Azizabad & Others | Cr.PC-22-A | / |
Matter is called, None is present for petitioner. Matter is adjourned to 21.09.2026 for hearing as last chance |
||
| 49 | Cr. Pet. (Criminal Petitions) 2983/2026 | Usama Jawaid S/O Jawaid Akhtar VS The SHO Of Ps Rizvia society & Others | Cr.PC-22-A | / |
Heard the arguments both side. Order passed in court. SHO Concerned is directed maintain the peace within their jurisdiction and provide necessary protection to the applicant/petitioner without prejudicing his life & liberty, in accordance with law. However, it is clarified that this order shall not affect any enquiry, complaint, investigation, suit or trial in which if the applicant/ petitioner is party or would be a party that shall be decided on merit in accordance with law. Application in hand disposed of accordingly.???????????????????????????? |
||
| 50 | Cr. Pet. (Criminal Petitions) 3092/2026 | Bao Naseer Ahmed VS The SHO Of Ps Azizabad & Others | Cr.PC-22-A | / |
Heard the arguments both side. Order passed in court. SHO Concerned is directed maintain the peace within their jurisdiction and provide necessary protection to the applicant/petitioner without prejudicing his life & liberty, in accordance with law. However, it is clarified that this order shall not affect any enquiry, complaint, investigation, suit or trial in which if the applicant/ petitioner is party or would be a party that shall be decided on merit in accordance with law. Application in hand disposed of accordingly. However; parties are at liberty to approach proper forum for their grievance |
||
| 51 | Cr. Pet. (Criminal Petitions) 3093/2026 | Muhammad Shahid Ali VS The SHO Of PS Bilal Colony & Others | Cr.PC-22-A | / |
learned counsel for the applicant/ accused has endorsed at the front page of the application/petition that he do not press his petition/application. Thus, in view of the above statement, Cr. Misc. application in hand stands dismissed as not press. |
||
| 52 | Cr. Pet. (Criminal Petitions) 3049/2026 | Syed Abdul Farhan VS The SHO OF PS KH.AJ.Nagri & Others | Cr.PC-22-A | / |
Matter is called, Heard the arguments by both side. Order passed in court. Instant petition is devoid of merits and stands dismissed in limine. |
||
| 53 | Cr. Pet. (Criminal Petitions) 3137/2026 | Muhammad Ali Ganatra VS The SHO Of Ps Azizabad & Others | Cr.PC-22-A | / |
Heard the arguments by applicant side. Order passed. Application is allowed in above terms. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Supply of Copies | |||||||
| 54 | PPC 1290/2026 | State VS Mosa | 602/2025 N.K.Ind. Area |
Case is called, Accused is not produce in custody by jail and call custody on line. Case is adjourned to 28.09.2026 for copy supply |
|||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 55 | PPC 547/2026 | The State VS Abid Ali & Others | PPC-147,PPC-149,PPC-353 | 60/2026 Gabol Town |
Case is called, Accused Abid, Naeem Khan, Raees, Zainullah are present on bail and charge framed of all 4 accused. DC for accused and ADPP for state are present. Police file is not present. Case is adjourned to 14.10.2026 for evidence and call police file and issue summons against witnesss |
||
| 56 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 275/2026 | State VS Gulab Ali | 89/2026 Super Market |
Case called. Accused is not produced by the central J/A on line and DC for accused and ADPP for state are present. Case is adjourned to 29.09.2026 for charge |
|||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Misc. Applications | |||||||
| 57 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 233/2026 | Tanveer Shaikh s/o Abdul Raheem VS The State | / |
Matter is called, Complaianant and Counsel for applicant complaianant are present. ADPP is present. Matter is adjourned to 21.09.2026 for issue notice to IO and call report from trial court |
|||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Compromise going on | |||||||
| 58 | SC (Murder Trial) 556/2024 | The State VS Bilal & others | Shakeel Ahmed(ADVO-7820-SBC-KHW) | PPC-302 | 463/2022 Rizvia Society |
Case called. Both Accused Saeed and Bilal are present. DC for accused and ADPP present. Case is adjourned to 26.09.2026 for evidence and hearing compromised applications and call report from Nadra and call report from Mukhtiarkar |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Statement of Accused | |||||||
| 59 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 558/2025 | The State VS Zahid, Nasir & M. Nawaz | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-KHI) | Irfan Ali (ADVO-22084-SBC-KHE),Siddique Akbar(ADVO-17276-SBC-KHE) | Special Case Narcotics -9(1) 3(c) | 176/2025 S.I.U. Karachi Central |
Case called, Accused is not produced in custody by central jail on line and Issue production order of accused to jail to produce custody on line. DC and ADPP Present. Case is adjourned to 29.09.2026 for statement of accused |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Execution of NBW | |||||||
| 60 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 536/2023 | The State VS Ayub | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-KHI) | Control of Narcotic Substances Act -9A | 103/2023 Super Market |
Case called. None is present. ??Record shows that accused person(s) jumped the bail, consequently Warrant was/were issued against him/them.?????????????? R & P of instant case received to this Court by the order???s of Honourable District & Sessions Judge Karachi Central. From perusal of diary sheet it appears that since long accused person remained absent and warrants were issued and since then instant matter one or the other reason adjourned for same purpose, if the same practice is continued then no fruitful result will be served, hence his bail stands cancelled and surety forfeited.???????????? As per case law reported in 1987 MLD 1032 Karachi (Yousuf Mashi V/s The State) whereby the Honourable Apex Court held that if NBW was issued against accused, then his bail was automatically be cancelled and it is not necessary to issue notice to surety and accused.It is, therefore, hereby ordered to keep this case on dormant file and to be reopened as and when accused person (s) is/are arrested or appeared before the Court. Issue perpetual warrant against accused and CNIC???s of accused and his surety ordered to be block till further order. SSP is directed to trace and block the CNIC and SIM cards of above named accused person(s) and their sureties. Office is directed to issue letter to SSP accordingly. |
|
| 61 | PPC 2362/2023 | The State VS M.Talha /M.Hussain | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-KHI) | PPC-397 | 263/2023 Sh. Noor Jehan |
Case called, Accused Hussain called absent without any application or intimation. Accused Talha is in custody in other case and his Surety of accused Talha already submit intimation that accused in malir jail in other case. Order passed. Call custody on line. ADPP present. Case is adjourned to 30.09.2026 for compliance and issue NBW against accused Husnain and notice to surety. |
|
| 62 | PPC 2406/2023 | The State VS Salman Ali Jatoi | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-KHI) | PPC-397 | 423/2022 Sh. Noor Jehan |
Case called. Accused is called absent without any application or intimation. Case is adjourned to 22.09.2026 for compliance and issue NBW against accused and notice to surety |
|
| 63 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 95/2024 | The State VS Ghulam Shabbir S/o Ashfaq | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI) | Control of Narcotic Substances Act -9B | 779/2023 New Karachi |
Case called. None is present. ??Record shows that accused person(s) jumped the bail, consequently Warrant was/were issued against him/them.?????????????? R & P of instant case received to this Court by the order???s of Honourable District & Sessions Judge Karachi Central. From perusal of diary sheet it appears that since long accused person remained absent and warrants were issued and since then instant matter one or the other reason adjourned for same purpose, if the same practice is continued then no fruitful result will be served, hence his bail stands cancelled and surety forfeited.???????????? As per case law reported in 1987 MLD 1032 Karachi (Yousuf Mashi V/s The State) whereby the Honourable Apex Court held that if NBW was issued against accused, then his bail was automatically be cancelled and it is not necessary to issue notice to surety and accused.It is, therefore, hereby ordered to keep this case on dormant file and to be reopened as and when accused person (s) is/are arrested or appeared before the Court. Issue perpetual warrant against accused and CNIC???s of accused and his surety ordered to be block till further order. SSP is directed to trace and block the CNIC and SIM cards of above named accused person(s) and their sureties. Office is directed to issue letter to SSP accordingly. |
|
| 64 | PPC 486/2024 | The State VS Tabish | Shakeel Ahmed(ADVO-7820-SBC-KHW) | PPC-353 | 536/2023 Khuwaja Ajmer Nagri |
Case is called, Accused Tabish is called absent without any application or intimation. Case is adjourned to 22.09.2026 for compliance and issue NBW against accused and notice to surety |
|
| 65 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 154/2024 | The State VS Mubeen s/o M Nadeem | Allah Ditta(ADVO-14195-SBC-KHE) | Special Case Narcotics -6/9-A | 44/2024 Gulbahar |
???? Case called. None is present. ??Record shows that accused person(s) jumped the bail, consequently Warrant was/were issued against him/them.?????????????? R & P of instant case received to this Court by the order???s of Honourable District & Sessions Judge Karachi Central. From perusal of diary sheet it appears that since long accused person remained absent and warrants were issued and since then instant matter one or the other reason adjourned for same purpose, if the same practice is continued then no fruitful result will be served, hence his bail stands cancelled and surety forfeited.???????????? As per case law reported in 1987 MLD 1032 Karachi (Yousuf Mashi V/s The State) whereby the Honourable Apex Court held that if NBW was issued against accused, then his bail was automatically be cancelled and it is not necessary to issue notice to surety and accused.It is, therefore, hereby ordered to keep this case on dormant file and to be reopened as and when accused person (s) is/are arrested or appeared before the Court. Issue perpetual warrant against accused and CNIC???s of accused and his surety ordered to be block till further order. SSP is directed to trace and block the CNIC and SIM cards of above named accused person(s) and their sureties. Office is directed to issue letter to SSP accordingly. |
|
| 66 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 229/2024 | The State VS Ghulam Shabbir S/o Ashfaq | SPP(ADVO-003-SBC-KHI) | Special Case Narcotics -6/9-B | 93/2024 New Karachi |
Case called. None is present. ??Record shows that accused person(s) jumped the bail, consequently Warrant was/were issued against him/them.?????????????? R & P of instant case received to this Court by the order???s of Honourable District & Sessions Judge Karachi Central. From perusal of diary sheet it appears that since long accused person remained absent and warrants were issued and since then instant matter one or the other reason adjourned for same purpose, if the same practice is continued then no fruitful result will be served, hence his bail stands cancelled and surety forfeited.???????????? As per case law reported in 1987 MLD 1032 Karachi (Yousuf Mashi V/s The State) whereby the Honourable Apex Court held that if NBW was issued against accused, then his bail was automatically be cancelled and it is not necessary to issue notice to surety and accused.It is, therefore, hereby ordered to keep this case on dormant file and to be reopened as and when accused person (s) is/are arrested or appeared before the Court. Issue perpetual warrant against accused and CNIC???s of accused and his surety ordered to be block till further order. SSP is directed to trace and block the CNIC and SIM cards of above named accused person(s) and their sureties. Office is directed to issue letter to SSP accordingly. |
|
| 67 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 299/2024 | The State VS Muhammad Iqbal | SPP(ADVO-003-SBC-KHI) | Special Case Narcotics -6/9-B | 135/2024 Bilal Colony |
Case called. None is present. ??Record shows that accused person(s) jumped the bail, consequently Warrant was/were issued against him/them.?????????????? R & P of instant case received to this Court by the order???s of Honourable District & Sessions Judge Karachi Central. From perusal of diary sheet it appears that since long accused person remained absent and warrants were issued and since then instant matter one or the other reason adjourned for same purpose, if the same practice is continued then no fruitful result will be served, hence his bail stands cancelled and surety forfeited.???????????? As per case law reported in 1987 MLD 1032 Karachi (Yousuf Mashi V/s The State) whereby the Honourable Apex Court held that if NBW was issued against accused, then his bail was automatically be cancelled and it is not necessary to issue notice to surety and accused.It is, therefore, hereby ordered to keep this case on dormant file and to be reopened as and when accused person (s) is/are arrested or appeared before the Court. Issue perpetual warrant against accused and CNIC???s of accused and his surety ordered to be block till further order. SSP is directed to trace and block the CNIC and SIM cards of above named accused person(s) and their sureties. Office is directed to issue letter to SSP accordingly. |
|
| 68 | PPC 1124/2024 | The State VS Arbaz s/o Wazeer Bux | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI) | PPC-392,PPC-393 | 691/2023 Sh. Noor Jehan |
Case called. Accused is called absent. DC for accused and ADPP are present. Case is adjourned to 14.10.2026 for compliance and Issue NBW against accused and notice to surety |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For U/S 87 Cr. P.C | |||||||
| 69 | PPC 1937/2024 | State VS Faheem | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI) | Muhammad Kamran Khan(ADVO-13694-SBC-KHS) | PPC-324,PPC-353,PPC-397 | 165/2024 F.B.I. Area |
After released on bail, accused Faheem son of Muhammad Afzal has misused the concession of bail and abscond away; hence issued NBW against accused persons but, process could not be executed by Police authorities. However, statement of process server was recorded, who produced unexecuted N.B.W & statement & reports, thereafter proclamation u/S 87 & 88 Cr.P.C were issued, which was returned unexecuted, such statement of process server was recorded, he furnished his reports along with 87 & 88 Cr.P.C, which are kept on record. After recording statements of process servers and perusal material, it is clearly transpiring that there is no chance of arresting of absconding accused namely Faheem son of Muhammad Afzal in present case in a near future, as he has been absconded away towards unknown place and there is no knowledge to police about accused and his whereabouts. He also does not possess any moveable or immovable property; therefore, the case of accused Afaq Ahmed son of Ashfaq Ahmed is declared as proclaimed offender in this case, his case be kept on Dormant File till his will arrest by the Police. Let such intimation be made to concerned Police Station. Office is directed to issue perpetual NBW against the above named absconder accused and report be called from concerned SHO on fortnightly basis. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Execution of NBW | |||||||
| 70 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 3806/2024 | The State VS Rashid Abdul Rasheed s/o Abdul Rasheed | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Special Case Narcotics -U/S 9(2)-2-CNS | 445/2024 Gulberg |
Case called. Accused is absent without any application or intimation. Case is adjourned to 22.10.2026 for compliance and issue NBW against accused and notice to surety. |
| 71 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 18/2025 | The State VS 1.Siraj Ahmed 2.M.Kaleem3.Shaikh Fahim Roshan 4.Saqib Faraz Khan | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI) | Imran(ADVO-11259-SBC-KHE),Mahmood -ul- Hasan(ADVO-8162-SBC-KHS) | The Control Narcotic Substance (Amended) Act, 2022-9(2)-B | 493/2024 Gulberg |
Case called. Accused Kaleem and Siraj and Saqib are present and Accused Fahim is absent. DC for accused and ADPP for state are present. Case is adjourned to 14.10.2026 for charge/compliance and issue NBW against and Fahim and notice to surety |
| 72 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 32/2025 | The State VS Sharif S/O Ghulam Hussain | Muhammad Arif Sitai(Suspend) | Special Case Narcotics -6/9-B | 606/2024 Rizvia Society |
Case called, Accused is called absent without any application or intimation. Case is adjourned to 27.10.2026 for compliance and issue NBWs against remaining accused and notice to surety |
|
| 73 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 1303/2025 | The State VS Samiullah s/o Ismatullah | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-KHI) | SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (I) A | 295/2025 Rizvia Society |
Case called. Accused is absent. Repeat NBW against accused and notice to surety. ADPP for state is present. Case is adjourned to 23.09.2026 for compliance |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For ex-parte proof. | |||||||
| 1 | Defamation Suits 8/2024 |
M/S PEST Management Service Pvt. Ltd. VS Ahmed Yar Khan | Anwar Ali (ADVO-21029-SBC-KHE) | Mohammad Hussain(ADVO-22389-SBC-KHS) | P/advocate is present and heard the arguments on application under article 74. Order passed. Allowed. None is present for defendant. Case put off to 08/10/2026 for filling Ex-party proof. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 2 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 253/2025 |
Syed Waseem Sibtain Rizvi VS Province of Sindh Through Chief Secretary and others | Muhammad Irfan(ADVO-4479-SBC-KHC) | Civil Appeal called. Associate counsel for Appellant side Cousnel is present. Counsel for the Respondent NO 1/2/6/3/10/7 are present. Heard the arguments. fixed on 08.10.2026 for service of remaining Respondents and objection and copy supply and hearing by applicant side |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION Succession Miscellaneous Applications | |||||||
| 3 | SMA (SMA (Received from HC)) 112/2025 |
Majid Durani S/O Sardar Muhammad Mobin VS Public at large | Javaid Ahmed(ADVO-4333-SBC-KHC) | reserved |
|||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 35/2026 | Mujeeb Alam S/O Iftikhar Alam VS Public at large | Ejaz Alam(ADVO-6116-SBC-KHC) | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-278 | Counsel for petitioner is present and Matter is adjourned to 28.09.2026, verification report of BSC, and order passed on filing of explanation, verification report of death certificate FRC Mumtaz Alam from nadra, production of original BSC, appearance and hearing |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Hearing of Applications | |||||||
| 2 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 578/2022 | Raeesa Bano Wd/o Ishtiaq Ahmed VS Public at large | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-372 | SMA is called, Heard the arguments. Put off to 19.09.2026 for further hearing |
||
| 3 | G.W. A. (G&W Appeals) 37/2025 | Zaeem Zahid S/O Zahid Muhammad Ali VS Syeda Jabeen Fatima W/O Hafiz Muhammad Asif | Ahmer Jamil Khan(ADVO-17318-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Arif Khan(ADVO-5275-SBC-KHC) | Family Appeal-Section 14 of Family Court Act | Matter called. Counsel for respondent is present and heard the arguments. None is present for applicant. Matter is adjourned to 03.10.2026 for hearing by applicant side and call three R & Ps |
||
| 4 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 86/2012 | Mst.Ameeran Wd/o Abdul Majeed VS Abdul Majeed S/o Azeemullah Patel (Deceased) | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-278,SUCCESSION ACT 1925-372 | Counsel for petitioner is present. Matter is adjourned to 28.09.2026 for issue show cause notice against department concerned for non compliance |
|||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Succession Miscellaneous Applications | |||||||
| 5 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 16/2024 | Shahid Zafar S/O Noor uddin VS Public at large | Hameed Ahmed(ADVO-7953-SBC-KHS) | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-278 | Advocate for the Petitioner is present and Cousnel for objector No.1 and Lrs Sajid are present. Case put off to 29/09/2026 for call verfication report from registrar |
||
| 6 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 243/2024 | Syed Nadeem Abbas S/O Syed Hassan Abbas VS Public at large | Ghulam Ali Khan(ADVO-14769-SBC-KHS) | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-278 | Petitioner and his counsel are present. Submit affidavit/statement. Order passed on separate sheet. Put off to 26/09/2026 for report |
||
| 7 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 295/2024 | Kasifullah Jan S/O Syed Moinuddin VS Public at large | Rashid Ali(ADVO-13865-SBC-KHC) | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-278 | Case called None is present. report not received. Call reports from Nadra and Mukhtiarkar and property. Matter is fixed on 23.09.2026 for reports as last chance |
||
| 8 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 93/2025 | Syed Muneer Ul Hasssan VS Public at large | Rashid Ali(ADVO-13865-SBC-KHC) | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-278 | Counsel for Petitioner is present. Put of to 29.09.2026 for call report FRC report from Nadra regarding deceased Tahira |
||
| 9 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 325/2025 | Mst. Afroz Parveen VS Muhammad Ayaz Akhter (deceased) | Pervaiz Khan(ADVO-7912-SBC-KHW) | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-372 | Matter is called, Counsel for petitioner is present. Detail order passed on separate sheet |
||
| 10 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 413/2025 | Mst. Sidra Noman Wd/o Abdul Noman Abbasi VS Public at large | Muzammil Iqbal(ADVO-9075-SBC-KHC) | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-278 | None is present. Repeat / Call report from concerned departments. matter is fixed on 26.09.2026 for report/compliance as last chance |
||
| 11 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 433/2025 | Mst. Mubeen Fatima VS Mst. Mumtaz Begum (deceased) | Hussain Ahmed Nasir Lodhi(ADVO-18022-SBC-KHE) | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-372 | None is present. Objector No.2 is called absent. Repeat notice to objectors except No.3 as order before Put up to 22.09.2026 for Hg/await of reports as last chance |
||
| 12 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 490/2025 | Atif Hussain VS Mst. Sajida Ahrar | Muhammad Tahir Bhatti(ADVO-12131-SBC-KHS) | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-278 | Both side are present and heard the arguments. Order passed in court. Let the Record & Proceedings (R&P) of the instant SMA be sent to the Honourable District & Sessions Judge, Karachi Central, with the request to transfer the instant civil suit to the Court of competent jurisdiction for its disposal in accordance with law. Order accordingly. |
||
| 13 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 503/2025 | Mst. Rubina VS Abdul Salam & Others | Sheeraz Ali(ADVO-51662-SBC-KHS) | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-278 | Advocate for the petitioner is present. Repeat on pointation and Call report from Union Counsel. Put up to 28-09-2026 for appearance of other legal heirs /hearing and call objector |
||
| 14 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 529/2025 | Syed Fawad Motassim VS Syed Rehan | Asma Khan(ADVO-13894-SBC-KHS) | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-372 | Matter is called, Counsel for the petitioner is present. Heard the arguments. Detail order passed on separate sheet |
||
| 15 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 14/2026 | Hufaifa VS Mst. Firdous Begum | Farah Naz(ADVO-10692-SBC-KHE) | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-372 | SMA is called, None is present. Matter is adjourned to 28.09.2026 for call report from remaining departments as last chance |
||
| 16 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 64/2026 | Syeda Nasreen Ghani VS Public at large | In Person() | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-372 | SMA is called. Counsel for petitioner is present and nadra report is received. Matter is adjourned to 28/09/2026 For verification and report of Nadra and issue remainder against Nadra |
||
| 17 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 181/2026 | Iqbal Muhammad Khan VS Public at large | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-278 | Mater is called, Counsel for petitioner is present and submit application US 151 CPPC. Order passed. Allowed detail order passed on separate sheet. Mater is adjourned to 26.09.2026 for service as order before and appearance |
|||
| 18 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 170/2012 | Muhammad Hasnain VS Mst. Rizwana Fatima | IN PERSON (SELF)(ADVO-001-SBC-MKS) | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-278 | SMA is called. Counsel for petitioner is present. Matter is adjourned to 28.09.2026 for call report from Nazir and verification call from Nadra of two LRs |
||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Next Hearing Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | |||||
| 1 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 578/2022 |
Raeesa Bano Wd/o Ishtiaq Ahmed VS Public at large | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-372 | ||