ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE IV, DADU : 11-SEP-2026

S.NO. CASE NO NAME OF PARTIES ADVOCATES UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS FIR No. Hearing Status
Party Side 1 Party Side 2

CRIMINAL JURISDICTION

S.NO. CASE NO NAME OF PARTIES ADVOCATES UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS FIR No. Hearing Status
Party Side 1 Party Side 2
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Report
1 Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 1061/2025 The State VS Seenghar Mastoi   Fayaz Ali(ADVO-531-SBC-DDU)   ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI)   SINDH ARMS ACT-25-A 122/2025
Johi
2 PPC 119/2026 The State VS Mukhtiar Babar and others   Muhammad Tasleem(ADVO-942-SBC-DDU)   ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI)   Anti-Rape (Investigation and Trial Act, 2021)-U/S Act: Anti-Rape,PPC-34,PPC-376,PPC-452,PPC-506-B,PPC-511 242/2025
A-Section (Dadu)
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence
3 SC (Murder Trial) 969/2014 The State VS Ghulam Sarwar Jamali & Others(Manzoor Jamali)   Fayaz Ali(ADVO-531-SBC-DDU)   ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI)   PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-302,PPC-324 14/2014
Phulji Village

Case called. Accused 1. Muhammad Bux (2)-Sarwar, (3) Gulsher are convicted U/S 265-H (ii), Cr.P.C, and accused (1)-Gulzar and (2) Anwar are acquitted u/s 265-H (i), Cr.P.C, vide Judgment dated 19.08.2019. Accused Manzoor Ali is produced under custody from District Prison Dadu. Learned advocate for accused is called absent. Complainant Sohrab Jamali is present. Mr.Naveed Ahmed Shahani advocate for complainant is present. Process returned unserved. Order passed on it. Issue show cause to SHO that why summons has not been served on official witnesses. Issue NBW against PW Shabir. Case is adjourned to-.17.09.2026 for evidence. Repeat summons to remaining all PWs. Accused is sent back to same prison with directions to produce him on next date of hearing.

4 PPC 1/2025 Azhar Ali Siyal VS Abdul Ghafoor Siyal and others   Ashfaque Ali(ADVO-359-SBC-DDU)   Sikander Ali(ADVO-504-SBC-DDU)   Anti-Rape (Investigation and Trial Act, 2021)-U/S Act: Anti-Rape,Gender Based Violence-,PPC-324,PPC-354-A,PPC-452,PPC-504,PPC-506 /

Case called. Complainant Azhar Ali Siyal and witness Mst.Uroosa are present. learned advocate for complainant is called absent. Accused 1.Zameer, 2 .Waseem and 3.Abdul Rehman are present. Accused Mueen Ahmed and Abdul Ghafoor are also present and submitted application for excusing their late comming. Order passed on it. Mr. Sikandar Ali Soomro learned advocate for all accused is absent and sent adjournment application. Order passed on it. Case is adjourned to-29.09.2026 for evidence. Accused are directed to attend.

5 PPC 95/2025 The State VS Azhar Ali Siyal and others   Fayaz Ali(ADVO-531-SBC-DDU),Sikander Ali(ADVO-504-SBC-DDU)   Ashfaque Ali(ADVO-359-SBC-DDU)   PPC-397 296/2024
A-Section (Dadu)

Case called. Accused 1. Azhar, 2.Rashid Ali, 3.Mazhar Hussain, and 4.Jawaid are present on bail, Mr. Ashfaque Ali Abbasi learned advocate for all accused is called absent. Learned APG for the state is present. Complainant Abdul Ghafoor, PWs Abdul Rehman and Waseem are present and directed to attend. Mr. Sikandar Ali Soomro advocate for complainant is absent and sent adjournment application. Order passed on it. Case is adjourned to-29.09.2026 for evidence. Accused are directed to attend.

6 PPC 282/2025 The State VS Waheed Ali Soalngi & Others   Jawaid Ali Sahito(ADVO-293-SBC-DDU)   ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK)   PPC-354,PPC-452,PPC-504,PPC-506-B 30/2025
A-Section (Dadu)
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A
7 Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 2210/2026 Muhammad Nawaz Khoso VS SSP Dadu and others   Abdul Hafeez(ADVO-500-SBC-DDU)   Fayaz Ali(ADVO-531-SBC-DDU)   Cr.PC-22-A /

Matter called. Applicant and his learned advocate are present. Learned APG for the State is present. Reports are received from concerned quarters. Proposed accused is absent. Mr.Tarique Hussain Channa advocate is present with statement. Heard arguments. Order passed and announced in open court. The instant Criminal Miscellaneous Application is hereby dismissed.

CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Misc. Applications
8 Illegal Dispos. Act (Illegal Dispossesion Act) 16/2026 Karam Khan Jamali VS Peeral Jamali and others   Habib Ali(ADVO-624-SBC-DDU)   Fayaz Ali(ADVO-531-SBC-DDU)   illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3 /

I.D Complaint called. Complainant Karam Khan Jamali is present. Mr. Habib Ali Leghari learned advocate for complainant is present. Reports are received from Mukhtiarkar and SHO concerned. Opponent Peeral, Zulfiquar, Hamzo and Rahab are present. Mr.Sayed Faiz Ahmed Shah learned advocate for opponents is present and filed adjournment application. Order passed on it. Put off to-18.09.2026 for hearing.

CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Statement of Accused
9 PPC 325/2021 The State VS Sikandar Ali Panhwar & Others   Fayaz Ali(ADVO-531-SBC-DDU)   ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK)   PPC-114,PPC-324,PPC-337-D,PPC-337-H,PPC-34,PPC-504 26/2021
Phulji Station

Case called. Accused Sikandar Ali Panhwar is produced under custody from District Prison Dadu. While accused Ghulam Murtaza and Ghulam Sarwar are already acquitted u/s 265-H(i) Cr.PC, vide Judgment dated:28.03.2023. Mr. Safdar Ali Charan advocate for accused is present. Learned APG for the State is present. Mr.Habib Ali Leghari advocate for complainant is present. Statement of accused u/s 342 Cr.PC,recorded at Exh.No.12. Accused his further statement through his Learned advocate as required u/s 265-F(i) Cr.PC, alongwith documents. Case is adjourned to- 18-09.2026 for final arguments. Accused is sent back to same prison with directions to produce him before this court on the date of hearing.

CIVIL JURISDICTION

S.NO. CASE NO NAME OF PARTIES ADVOCATES Hearing Status
Party Side 1 Party Side 2
CIVIL JURISDICTION For Issues
1 Defamation Suits 3/2026
Ali Gohar Jamali VS Abdullah Mallah   ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK)  

Matter called. Attorney of plaintiff is present. Learned advocate for plaintiff is present. Defendant is absent. Learned advocate for defendant is present. Learned advocate for plaintiff filed objections on application U/O 7 Rule 11 CPC R/W Section 151 Cr.PC, copy supplied to other side. Matter is adjourned to-18.09.2026 for Issues/hearing on application U/O 7 Rule 11 CPC R/W Section 151 Cr.PC.

CIVIL JURISDICTION For Arguments
2 C.A. (Civil Appeals) 71/2023
Mst. Rukhsana and another VS Mst. Lubna and others   Abdul Hafeez(ADVO-500-SBC-DDU)   Sikander Ali(ADVO-504-SBC-DDU)

Matter called. Attorney of appellants called absent. Mr. Abdul Hafeez Panhwar learned advocate for appellants is present. Fahad Mustafa, attorney of respondent No. 1 is called absent his advocate Mr. Sikander Ali Soomro is absent sent adjournment application. Order passed on it. Official Respondents No. 2 to 6 have not interested. Civil Appeal is adjourned to 19.09.2026 for hearing on appeal. ( R& Ps of trial court is available).

FAMILY JURISDICTION

S.NO. CASE NO NAME OF PARTIES ADVOCATES UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS Hearing Status
Party Side 1 Party Side 2
FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service
1 F.A. (Family Appeals) 24/2026 Naseer Ahmed Lund VS Mst. Afsana Lund   Aftab Ali(ADVO-1031-SBC-DDU)   Family Appeal-Section 14 of Family Court Act
FAMILY JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A.
2 F.A. (Family Appeals) 13/2026 Abdullah Lund VS Mst Safooran Lund   Mukhtiar Ali(ADVO-109-SBC-JMS)   Tasleem Khan(ADVO-6403-SBC-HYD) Family Appeal-Section 14 of Family Court Act
3 F.A. (Family Appeals) 35/2026 Mst Samina Siyal VS Ahsan Siyal   Ali Akbar Mangi(ADVO-963-SBC-DDU)   Family Appeal-Section 14 of Family Court Act

Matter called. Appellant is absent. Mr. Safdar Ali Charan learned advocate for appellant is called absent. Respondent is present. Learned advocate for respondent is absent. Family Appeal is adjourned to 26.09.2026 for W.S/objections/arguments. Call R & Ps of trial court

FAMILY JURISDICTION Succession Miscellaneous Applications
4 S.M.A. (S.M.A) 20/2026 Mst Arbab Chahwan VS Public at Large   Abdul Rasool Abbasi(ADVO-103-SBC-DDU)   SUCCESSION ACT 1925-278

Matter called. Applicant Mst.Arbab Chahwan is called absent her husband is present. Learned advocate for applicant is absent. Matter is adjourned to-12.09.2026 for arguments. Learned advocate for applicant is directed to produce legible copy of declined order of NADRA.