| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 2252/2026 | Muhammad Chandio and others VS The State | Ayaz Hussain(ADVO-639-SBC-DDU) | Cr.PC-498,PPC-452 | 116/2026 Johi |
Crl. Bail Application U/s 498 Cr.P.C is called. Applicants/accused Muhammad , 2. Abdul Raheem @ Raheem, 3. Abdul NAbi @ Abid, Asad Ali @ Asad and Abdul Hafeez @ Hafeez all by caste Chandio are present on interim pre-arrest bail. Mr. Ayaz Hussain Rind learned advocate for the applicants/accused is present. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Notice for complainant Jaro Chandio returned unserved upon him. The complainant is present. The work is suspended by the learned advocates of District Bar Association Dadu and they requested that no adverse order may be passed due to absence of advocates in their cases. P/Judge is on casual leave. B.A put off 13-10-2026 for hearing. Applicants/accused are directed to attend. The complainant is informed. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 2 | PPC 672/2025 | The State VS Babar alias Affi & others | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | Qaim Khan Jatoi(ADVO-54210-SBC-HYD) | PPC-397 | 84/2024 Kakar |
Case called. Accused 01. Nizam and 02. Alam Jamali are produced from District Prison Dadu. Accused Babar @ Affi is produced from Central Prison, Hyderabad through video link ( Meeting I.D No.849 2886 4262). While accused 01. Abdul Ghaffar Soomro 02. Luqman @ Afzal Khoso and 03. Mehboob are declared P.Os. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Mr. Sher Khan Chandio learned advocate for the complainant is not present. Mr. Qaim Khan Jatoi, learned advocate for the accused is present. The work is suspended by the learned advocates of District Bar Association Dadu and they requested that no adverse order may be passed due to absence of advocates in their cases. P/Judge is on casual leave. Case Put off to 26-10-2026 for evidence. Accused produced from District Prison, Dadu are remanded back to jail with directions to be produced on next date of hearing. Accused Babar @ Affi produced from C.P Hyderabad through video link is returned back to the jail authorities with directions to be produced on next date through video link. Repeat NBW against remaining PWs. |
| 3 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 674/2025 | The State VS Nizam Jamali | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | SINDH ARMS ACT-25-A | 87/2024 Kakar |
Case called. Accused Nizam Jamali is produced from District Prison Dadu. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Case is fixed for evidence. This case has already been ordered to be tried together with main case bearing S.C NO.672/2025 which has been adjourned hence this off shoot, the main case is already adjourned hence this case is also adjourned to 26.10.2026 for evidence. Accused is remanded back to custody with directions to produce on the next date of hearing. |
|
| 4 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 673/2025 | The State VS Babar alias Affi | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | SINDH ARMS ACT-25-A | 86/2024 Kakar |
Case called. Accused Babar @ Affi is produced from C.P Hyderabad through video link ( Meeting I.D No.849 2886 4262).Learned advocate for accused Babar @ Affi is present. Learned ADPP for the state is present. This case has already been ordered to be tried together with main case bearing S.C NO.672/2025 which has been adjourned hence this off shoot is also adjourned to 26-10-2026 for evidence. The Accused produced through video link is returned back to the jail authorities with directions to be produced on next date through video. |
|
| 5 | PPC 262/2026 | The State VS Sadam Hussain & Others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | PPC-114,PPC-324,PPC-504 | 3/2026 Wahi Pandhi |
Case called. Accused Sadam, & Azizullah are present on bail. While accused Sikandar and Inayatullah are declared P.Os. Mr. Ali Najaf Memon learned advocate for the accused is not present. His assistant is present. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Complainant Shahid Ahmed, P.Ws Dadan, Qurban, Abdul Jabbar and Moosa are present. Summons returned unserved for remaining PWs. The work is suspended by the learned advocates of District Bar Association Dadu and they requested that no adverse order may be passed due to absence of advocates in their cases. P/Judge is on casual leave. Case put off to 27-10-2026 for evidence. Present accused are directed to attend. Present complainant & PWs are bound down to attend. Issue notice to surety of accused Inayatullah. |
|
| 6 | PPC 418/2026 | The State VS Dilsher and other | Abdul Waheed Agro(ADVO-1018-SBC-DDU) | PPC-397 | 13/2026 Tharari Muhabat |
Case called. Accused Dilsher @ Gulsher Pirzado and Waseem Solangi are present on bail. Accused Azad Solangi is produced in custody from District Jail, Dadu. ADPP for the state is present. Lerned advocate for accused Waseem is not present. Informant Mehtab Hussain Chandio is present and submitted application for adjournment due to absence of his counsel. Order passed thereon. The work is suspended by the learned advocates of District Bar Association Dadu and they requested that no adverse order may be passed due to absence of advocates in their cases. P/Judge is on casual leave. Case put off to 28.10.2026 for evidence. Accused present on bail are directed to attend. Accused produced in custody is remanded back to jail with directions to be produced on next date of hearing. Present informant is directed to attend. Issue summons for remaining PWs. Call case property. |
|
| 7 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 559/2026 | The State VS Mashooque Mallah | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | Ali Najaf Memon(ADVO-654-SBC-DDU) | SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (i) (a) | 163/2026 A-Section (Dadu) |
Case Called. Accused Mashooque Mallah is present on bail. Mr. Ali Najaf Memon learned advocate for the accused is called absent. His assistant is present. Learned ADPP for the state is present. No PW is present. The work is suspended by the learned advocates of District Bar Association Dadu and they requested that no adverse order may be passed due to absence of advocates in their cases. P/Judge is on casual leave. Case put off to 27.10.2026 for evidence. Issue B.W against PWs. Call case property. |
| 8 | PPC 716/2026 | The State VS Nazar Hussain & others | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | PPC-114,PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-337-H,PPC-436 | 57/2026 Khudabad |
Case called. Accused Nazar Hussain, Abdul Majeed, Qurban, Shah Nawaz and Ali Sher are present on bail while accused Hussain is P.O. ADPP and Counsel for accused are present. No PW is present. . Summons for PWs returned unserved. The work is suspended by the learned advocates of District Bar Association Dadu and they requested that no adverse order may be passed due to absence of advocates in their cases. P/Judge is on casual leave. Put off to 29.10.2026 for evidence. Accused present on bail are directed to attend. Issue summons for P.Ws. Call case property. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 9 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 2401/2026 | Waseem Lakho VS SSP Dadu and others | Faheem(ADVO-429-SBC-DDU) | Cr.PC-22-A | / |
Crl. Misc: Application U/S 22- A & B Cr.P.C is Called. Applicant Waseem Lakho is present. Mr. Faheem Ahmed Ghalloo learned counsel for applicant is called absent. His partner advocate is present. Proposed accused and their counsel are present. The reports of the SHO PS B-Section and DSP DCRC Dadu are already received. The report is already received from ASI/Verification Officer, NCCIA Cyber Crime Reporting Centre, Hyderabad. The work is suspended by the learned advocates of District Bar Association Dadu and they requested that no adverse order may be passed due to absence of advocates in their cases. P/Judge is on casual leave. Matter put off to 13-10-2026 for hearing. The parties are informed. |
|
| 10 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 2500/2026 | Altaf Husain Hingoro VS SSP Dadu and others | Ghulam Mustafa(ADVO-687-SBC-DDU) | Cr.PC-22-A | / |
Crl. Misc: Application U/s 22- A & B Cr.P.C is called. Applicant Altaf Hingoro is present. Mr. Ghulam Mustafa Panhwar learned advocate for the applicant is present. Notice for proposed accused returned served upon Allah Parto. Proposed accused Abdul Razaque is present. Mr. Ghulam Nabi Lashari learned advocate filed vakalatnama on behalf of the opponent Abdul Razaque, Aslam, Allah Parto, Mehboob and Sarfraz all by caste Hingoro are present. The SHO PS Rukkan and DSP DCRC Dadu submitted their reports. The work is suspended by the learned advocates of District Bar Association Dadu and they requested that no adverse order may be passed due to absence of advocates in their cases. P/Judge is on casual leave. Matter put off to 13-10-2026 for hearing. The parties are informed. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Misc. Applications | |||||||
| 11 | Illegal Dispos. Act (Illegal Dispossesion Act) 27/2026 | Altaf Hussain Hingoro VS Dilshad Hingoro and others | Faheem Khan (ADVO-375-SBC-JMS) | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3,illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 4,illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 5 | / |
Crl. Complaint is called. Informant is present. Mr. Ghulam Mustafa Panhwar learned advocate for informant is present. Proposed accused namely 1. Dilshad, 2. Muhammad Aslam, 3. Abdul Razaque, 4. Akhtar Ali, 5. Abdul Waheed, 6. Mehboob Ali, 7. Inam Ali, 8. Roshan Ali, 9. Hubdar Ali and 10. Muhammad Ali all by caste Hingoro are present. Learned advocate for the proposed accused is present. The reports are already received. The work is suspended by the learned advocates of District Bar Association Dadu and they requested that no adverse order may be passed due to absence of advocates in their cases. P/Judge is on casual leave. Matter put off to 27-10-2026 for arguments on the reports. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For U/S 87 Cr. P.C | |||||||
| 12 | SC (Murder Trial) 1050/2025 | The State VS Mumtaz Bhurt & others | Ali Nawaz Buriro(ADVO-162-SBC-NSF) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-302,PPC-337-H,PPC-504 | 15/2025 Rajo Dero |
Case called. Accused Mumtaz Bhurt is produced from District Prison, Dadu. Accused Imtiaz Bhurt is present on bail. Accused Pathan S/O Ghulam Hussain Bhurt is is declared absconder. While accused Salikh, and Imamuddin all by caste Bhurt have already been declared proclaimed offenders. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Proclamation warrant U/s 87 Cr.P.C is not returned from the SHO PS Rajo Dero. Report on the order of attachment U/S 88 Cr.P.C issued against accused Pathan Bhurt is received from Mukhtiarkar Taluka Dadu. The work is suspended by the learned advocates of District Bar Association Dadu and they requested that no adverse order may be passed due to absence of advocates in their cases. P/Judge is on casual leave. Case is adjourned to 26-10-2026 for service. Accused present on bail is directed to attend. Accused produced in custody is returned back to the jail concerned with directions to be produced on next date. Issue show cause notice against the SHO PS Rajo Dero. Repeat proclamation U/S 87 Cr.P.C against accused Pathan Bhurt. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 43/2026 |
Muhammad Ayoub Lund and others VS Mst. Zareena Lund and others | Ali Akbar(ADVO-634-SBC-DDU) | Sohbat Ali(ADVO-9364-SBC-KHS) | Civil Appeal is called. Appellant No.01-b Abdul Toheed is present. Mr. Ali Akbar Buriro learned advocate for appellant No.01-b is present. Attorney of respondent No.01 is present. Learned advocate for attorney of respondent No.01 is present. Learned DDA is appeared and filed memo of appearance on behalf of respondents No.02 to 05. Applications U/O XXXIX Rule 1-2 CPC is pending. The work is suspended by the learned advocates of District Bar Association Dadu and they requested that no adverse order may be passed due to absence of advocates in their cases. P.Judge is on casual leave. Matter put off to19-10-2026 filing of objections by respondents No.2 to 5/order on the application U/O 39 Rule 1-2 CPC. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 2 | Summary Suits 16/2024 |
Ayaz Ali Lashari VS Gous Ali Jhatial and another | Ghulam Nabi(ADVO-763-SBC-DDU) | Summary suit called. Plaintiff Ayaz Ali Lashari is and his counsel are called absent. Defendant No. 1 Ghous Ali Jhatial and his counsel are present. The work is suspended by the learned advocates of District Bar Association Dadu and they requested that no adverse order may be passed due to absence of advocates in their cases. P/Judge is on casual leave. Matter put off to 22.10.2026 for plaintiff side evidence. |
|||
| 3 | Defamation Suits 9/2024 |
Pir Mujeeb-ul-Haq VS Sarfaraz Nabi Lund | Saeed Ahmed(ADVO-976-SBC-DDU) | Suit called. Shahmeer Chahwan Attorney of plaintiff is called absent. Learned advocate for plaintiff is called absent. His partner advocate is present. Defendants are called absent as before. The work is suspended by the learned advocates of District Bar Association Dadu and they requested that no adverse order may be passed due to absence of advocates in their cases. P/Judge is on casual leave. Matter put off to 24-10-2026 for plaintiff side evidence. |
|||
| 4 | Defamation Suits 8/2024 |
Pir Mujeeb-ul-Haq VS Ghulam Qadir @ Qadir Chandio | Faheem(ADVO-429-SBC-DDU) | Suit called. Shahmeer Chahwan Attorney of plaintiff is called absent. Learned advocate for plaintiff is called absent. His partner advocate is present. Defendants and his counsel are called absent. The work is suspended by the learned advocates of District Bar Association Dadu and they requested that no adverse order may be passed due to absence of advocates in their cases. P/Judge is on casual leave. Matter put off to 24-10-2026 for plaintiff side evidence. |
|||