| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 2305/2026 | Hubdar @ Maqsood Bhand VS The State | Sunbul (ADVO-958-SBC-DDU) | Cr.PC-497,PPC-324 | 327/2026 A-Section (Dadu) |
Crl. Bail Application U/S 497 Cr.P.C of applicant/accused Hubdar @ Maqsood Bhand is called. Mr. Ms. Sayeda Sunbul Kazmi Learned advocate is present and filed vakalatnama on behalf of applicant/accused Hubdar @ Maqsood Bhand. Order passed thereon. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open court. The applicant/accused Hubdar @ Maqsood Bhand is admitted to bail subject to furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs:30,000/- (Thirty thousand rupees) and P.R Bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of this court. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 2 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 2294/2026 | Farman Ali @ Adil Jahangir Joyo VS The State | Koura Khan Memon(ADVO-456-SBC-DDU) | Cr.PC-498,PPC-302 | 295/2025 K.N. Shah |
Crl. Bail Application U/S 498 Cr.P.C called. Applicant/accused Farman Ali @ Jahangir is present on interim pre-arrest bail. Learned advocate for the applicant/accused is present. The informant Muhammad Mithal Mahar is served on whats app. The informant is present. Mr. Wazir Ali Mahar Learned advocate is present, filed vakalatnama on behalf of the informant. Order passed thereon. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Today work is suspended by the learned advocates of District Bar Association Dadu and they requested that no adverse order may be passed due to absence of advocates in their cases. B.A put off to 20-10-2026 for hearing. The applicant/accused is directed to attend. The informant party is informed. |
|
| 3 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 2295/2026 | Khalid Lund VS The State | Mushtaque Ahmed(ADVO-260-SBC-DDU) | Cr.PC-498,PPC-337-A(i) | 7/2023 Wahi Pandhi |
Crl. Bail Application U/S 498 Cr.P.C called. Applicant/accused Khalid Lund is present on interim pre-arrest bail. Learned advocate for the applicant/accused is present. Notice against informant Makhan Rustamani is served through his mobile number. The informant is not present. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Today work is suspended by the learned advocates of District Bar Association Dadu and they requested that no adverse order may be passed due to absence of advocates in their cases. B.A put off to 20-10-2026 for hearing. The applicant/accused is directed to attend. |
|
| 4 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 2289/2026 | Buxial Khan Shahani and others VS The State | Kamran Ali(ADVO-750-SBC-DDU) | Cr.PC-498,PPC-452 | 153/2026 B-Section (Dadu) |
Crl. Bail Application U/S 498 Cr.P.C called. Applicant/accused Buxial Khan Shahani is present on interim pre-arrest bail. Learned advocate for the applicant/accused is present. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Informant Mst. Salaimat Shahani is not present. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open court. Interim pre-arrest bail earlier granted to the above named applicant/accused is confirmed on the same terms and conditions with directions to keep attending trial court. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 5 | SC (Murder Trial) 136/2024 | The State VS Amanullah Jamali and others | Mushtaque Ahmed (ADVO-231-SBC-JMS) | Aftab Ali(ADVO-1031-SBC-DDU),Ali Murtaza(ADVO-419-SBC-DDU),Faheem(ADVO-429-SBC-DDU) | PPC-109,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-302,PPC-337-A(i),PPC-504 | 36/2023 Phulji Station |
Case called. Accused 1. Basheer Ahmed Samejo 2. Kamal Fakeer 3. Amanullah Jamali, 4.Hassan Jamali, 5. Roshan and 6. Najaf @ Najamuddin Jamali are present on bail. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Learned advocate for accused 1. Amanullah Jamali 2. Muhammad Hassan Jamali 3. Kamal Faqeer Jamali and 4. Roshan Ali Jamali is not present. Mr. Faheem Ghalloo advocate for accused Bashir Ahmed Samejo is not present. Mr. Aftab Ali advocate for accused Najaf @ Najamuddin Jamali is not present. Mr. Mushtaque Ahmed Abro advocate for complainant is present. Complainant Abdul Majeed, PWs Tarique Hussain, are present. Today work is suspended by the learned advocates of District Bar Association Dadu and they requested that no adverse order may be passed due to absence of advocates in their cases. Case is also adjourned to 29-10-2026 for evidence. Present accused are directed to attend. Present complainant and PW are directed to attend. Issue B.W against remaining PWs. |
| 6 | SC (Murder Trial) 56/2024 | The State VS Majeed Panhwar and Others | Abdul Sattar Memon(ADVO-277-SBC-DDU) | Abdul Hakeem (ADVO-294-SBC-DDU),Faheem(ADVO-429-SBC-DDU),Mushtaque Ahmed (ADVO-231-SBC-JMS) | PPC-114,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-302,PPC-324,PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-Fi,PPC-337-Fiii,PPC-504 | 37/2023 Phulji Station |
Case called. Accused 1. Majeed Panhwar 2. Tarique 3. Sulleman 4. Gulzar 5. Master Allahdino 6. Niaz @ Ali Nawaz, 7 Nazeer @ Chacho and 08. Haji @ Abdul Razzaque Panhwar are present on bail. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Mr. Mushtaque Ahmed Abro Learned Advocate for accused Majeed, Gulzar, Tarique, Allah Dino, Ali Nawaz, Abdul Razzak and Nazeer is present. PWs Amanullah Jamali, Kamal Faqueer Jamali are present. Mr. Ali Bux Solangi advocate for the informant called absent. Today work is suspended by the learned advocates of District Bar Association Dadu and they requested that no adverse order may be passed due to absence of advocates in their cases. Case is adjourned to 29-10-2026 for evidence. Present accused are directed to attend. Present PWs are directed to attend. Issue B.W against remaining PWs. |
| 7 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 114/2024 | The State VS Chanesar Lund | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | Ayaz Hussain(ADVO-639-SBC-DDU),Zamir Hussain Rind(ADVO-999-SBC-DDU) | SINDH ARMS ACT-25-A | 208/2023 Johi |
Case called. Accused Chanessar Lund is produced from District Prison, Dadu. Learned ADPP for the State is present. Today work is also suspended at the request of District Bar Association Dadu. This case is connected with main case (S. Case No.113/2024 St/Vs Muhammad Arab & Others U/S 302,397,114,PPC P.S Johi which is already adjourned, hence this case is also adjourned to 31.10.2026 for evidence. Accused produced in custody is remanded back to the jail concerned with directions to be produced on next date. |
| 8 | SC (Murder Trial) 113/2024 | The State VS Muhammad Arab and others | Safdar Ali(ADVO-413-SBC-DDU) | Ali Abbas(ADVO-339-SBC-DDU),Ali Bux (ADVO-367-SBC-DDU),Ayaz Hussain(ADVO-639-SBC-DDU),Zamir Hussain Rind(ADVO-999-SBC-DDU) | PPC-114,PPC-302,PPC-397 | 202/2023 Johi |
Case called. Accused Muhammad Arab, Rasheed Lund and Abdullah Khaskheli are present on bail. While accused Chanessar is produced from District Prison, Dadu. Learned ADPP for the State is present. Learned advocate for accused Chanessar Lund and Abdullah Khaskheli is not present. Mr. Ali Bux Lund advocate for accused Muhammad Arab and Rasheed Ahmed Lund is not present. Mr. Safdar Ali Charan advocate for complainant is not present. His partner advocate is present. Application U/s 497 (5) Cr.PC for cancellation of bail of accused Arab is pending. Informant Irshad Ali and PW Rasool Bux are present and they are directed to attend. Today work is suspended by the learned advocates of District Bar Association Dadu and they requested that no adverse order may be passed due to absence of advocates in their cases. Case adjourned to 31.10.2026 for evidence/hearing on application U/s 497 (5) Cr.P.C. Accused present on bail are directed to attend. Accused produced in custody is remanded back to the jail concerned with directions to be produced on next date. Issue B.W against remaining PWs. |
| 9 | SC (Murder Trial) 243/2024 | The State VS Muhammad Khan Chandio & Others | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK),wazir hussain Chandio(ADVO-4101-SBC-HYD) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK),Abdul Hakeem (ADVO-294-SBC-DDU),Ali Akbar(ADVO-634-SBC-DDU),Koura Khan Memon(ADVO-456-SBC-DDU) | PPC-109,PPC-302,PPC-34 | 31/2024 B-Section (Dadu) |
Case called. Accused 01. Ghulam Qadir 02. Ghulam Hyder 03. Liaquat Ali 04. Asif 05. Dilbar, 06. Bashir and 07.Azizullah Chandio are present on bail. Accused 08. Muhammd Uris Panhwar and 09.Yaseen Chandio are not produced by jail authorities, District Prison, Dadu. Accused 10. Muhammad Khan & 11. Ramzan are already declared as proclaimed offenders. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Mr. Safdar Ali Charan Learned defence counsel for accused 1. Ghulam Qadir, 2. Ghulam Hyder, 3. Asif, 4. Dilbar, 5. Bashir, and 6.Muhammad Uris is not present. Mr. Abdul Hakeem Leghari learned advocate for accused Liquat Ali is present. Mr. Koura Khan Memon learned advocate for accused Muhammad Uris and Azizullah is also present. Complainant namely Ganhwar is present. Learned advocate for complainant is present. Surety Nadeem Ali had appeared on 08.08.2026 and filed application for release of his surety documents, he is called absent today. He has also failed to furnish reply of notice U/s 514 Cr.P.C. Notice against sureties of accused Muhammad Khan, Raman and Azizullah returned unserved.Today work is suspended by the learned advocates of District Bar Association Dadu and they requested that no adverse order may be passed due to absence of advocates in their cases. Case put off to 31.10.2026 for evidence. Accused present on bail are directed to attend. Issue P.O for accused Muhammad Uris and Muhammad Yaseen to the Superintendent, District Prison, Dadu. Repeat notice against sureties of accused Muhammad Khan, Raman and Azizullah. |
| 10 | PPC 326/2024 | The State VS Habibullah Chandio and others | Jawaid Ali Sahito(ADVO-293-SBC-DDU) | Khalid Saeed(ADVO-256-SBC-DDU),Koura Khan Memon(ADVO-456-SBC-DDU) | PPC-114,PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-324,PPC-337-A(i),PPC-504 | 82/2024 A-Section (Dadu) |
Case called. Accused 01. Habibullah, 02.Imam Bux, 03.Ganhwar 04. Misri Bouk, 05. Dost Ali 06.Wazeer and 07.Azizullah Chandio are present on bail. While accused 08.Yaseen is produced in custody from District Prison, Accused 09.Muhammad Khan, and 10. Ramzan are declared proclaimed offenders. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Learned advocate for the accused is not present. Complainant Zahid Ali and PWs Asif Ali and Dilbar are present. B.W issued against remaining PWs returned served upon ASI Dost Ali Lund but he is called absent. Today work is suspended by the learned advocates of District Bar Association Dadu and they requested that no adverse order may be passed due to absence of advocates in their cases. Matter is adjourned with last chance. Case is adjourned to 31.10.2026 for evidence. Accused present on bail are directed to attend. Present complainant and PWs are already bound down to attend. Issue B.Ws against P.Ws. Accused produced in custody is returned back with directions to be produced on next date. |
| 11 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 69/2026 | The State VS Daud Panhwar | Jawaid Ali Sahito(ADVO-293-SBC-DDU) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (I) A ,SINDH ARMS ACT-25-A | 200/2025 B-Section (Dadu) |
Case called. Accused Daud Panhwar is present on bail. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Learned advocate for the accused is not present. I.O/ASI Rashid Hussain, WHC Riaz Hussain Jamali and PW HCMuhammad Hassan Mallah are present. NBW against remaining PWs returned unserved and extended to the same process server. The main case is already adjourned hence this case is also adjourned to 24-10-2026 for evidence. Accused is directed to attend. Present I.O, PW are already bound down in main case and they directed to attend. Call case property. |
| 12 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 66/2026 | The State VS Bashir Ahmed leghari | Jawaid Ali Sahito(ADVO-293-SBC-DDU) | Raza Muhammad (ADVO-765-SBC-DDU) | SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (I) A ,SINDH ARMS ACT-25-A | 197/2025 B-Section (Dadu) |
Case called. Accused Bashir Ahmed Leghari is present on bail. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Learned advocate for the accused is not present. I.O/ASI Rashid Hussain, WHC Riaz Hussain Jamali and PW HCMuhammad Hassan Mallah are present. NBW against remaining PWs returned unserved and extended to the same process server. The main case is already adjourned hence this case is also adjourned to 24-10-2026 for evidence. Accused is directed to attend. Present I.O, PW are already bound down in main case and they directed to attend. Call case property. |
| 13 | PPC 65/2026 | The State VS Bashir Ahmed & others | Jawaid Ali Sahito(ADVO-293-SBC-DDU) | Faheem Khan (ADVO-375-SBC-JMS),Ghulam Ali (ADVO-636-SBC-DDU),Raza Muhammad (ADVO-765-SBC-DDU) | PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-324,PPC-353 | 196/2025 B-Section (Dadu) |
Case called. Accused 1.Bashir, 2.Peeral, 3. Naseer, 4. Rasheed, 5. Saleem, and 6.Aslam, 7.Ajeeb, 8.Imran, 09. Maqbool, 10. Bachal and 11. Jalal,all by caste Leghari and 12. Dawood Panhwar are present on bail. Accused 13. Waryam Leghari is produced in custody from District Prison, Dadu and submitted application for proceeding the case. Order passed thereon. While accused Anwar Leghari and Majeed alias Majoo Leghari are already declared proclaimed offenders. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Learned counsels for accused are not present. I.O/ASI Rashid Ali Panhwar, PWs HC Muhammad Hassan Mallah and WHC Riaz Gul are present. Examination in chief of complainant ASI Sajjad Hussain Zounr is recorded at Ex: No.6. His further examination in chief is already reserved for want of case property. The SHO PS B-Section Dadu is present and submitted reply of show cause notice. Order passed thereon. Show cause vacated with last warning. Issue show cause notice against the SHO. NBW against remaining PWs returned unserved and the same have been extended to the same process server. The work is suspended by the learned advocates of District Bar Association Dadu and they requested that no adverse order may be passed due to absence of advocates in their cases. Case is adjourned to 24-10-2026 for evidence. Accused present on bail are directed to attend. Accused produced in custody is remanded back to the jail concerned with directions to be produced on next date of hearing. Present PWs/I.O are bound down to attend. Call case property. |
| 14 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 68/2026 | The State VS Peeral Leghari | Jawaid Ali Sahito(ADVO-293-SBC-DDU) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (I) A ,SINDH ARMS ACT-25-A | 199/2025 B-Section (Dadu) |
Case called. Accused Peeral Leghari is present on bail. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Learned advocate for the accused is not present. I.O/ASI Rashid Hussain, WHC Riaz Hussain Jamali and PW HCMuhammad Hassan Mallah are present. NBW against remaining PWs returned unserved and extended to the same process server. The main case is already adjourned hence this case is also adjourned to 24-10-2026 for evidence. Accused is directed to attend. Present I.O, PW are already bound down in main case and they directed to attend. Call case property. |
| 15 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 67/2026 | The State VS Aslam Leghari | Jawaid Ali Sahito(ADVO-293-SBC-DDU) | Raza Muhammad (ADVO-765-SBC-DDU) | SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (I) A ,SINDH ARMS ACT-25-A | 198/2025 B-Section (Dadu) |
Case called. Accused Aslam Leghari is present on bail. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Learned advocate for the accused is not present. I.O/ASI Rashid Hussain, WHC Riaz Hussain Jamali and PW HCMuhammad Hassan Mallah are present. NBW against remaining PWs returned unserved and extended to the same process server. The main case is already adjourned hence this case is also adjourned to 24-10-2026 for evidence. Accused is directed to attend. Present I.O, PW are already bound down in main case and they directed to attend. Call case property. |
| 16 | PPC 271/2026 | The State VS Sajid & others | Mujan Ali(ADVO-628-SBC-DDU) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-337-H,PPC-427,PPC-436,PPC-504,PPC-506 | 7/2025 Rajo Dero |
Case is called. Accused Yameen S/O Mour Bhurt is present on bail. While accused Sajid, Wajid, Sadaquat, Gohar, Aijaz, Naseer, Rashid, Kashif and Nisar are already declared proclaimed offenders. Learned advocate for the accused is not present. Learned ADPP for the state is present. I.O/SIP Rasool Bux Panhwar is present and bound down to attend. B.W against remaining PWs returned unserved and extended to the same process server. Today work is suspended by the learned advocates of District Bar Association Dadu and they requested that no adverse order may be passed due to absence of advocates in their cases. Case adjourned to 26.10.2026 for evidence. |
| 17 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 272/2026 | The State VS Yameen Bhurt | Mujan Ali(ADVO-628-SBC-DDU) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24,SINDH ARMS ACT-25-A | 8/2025 Rajo Dero |
Case called. Accused Yameen S/O Mour Bhurt is present on bail. Learned advocate for the accused is present. Learned ADPP for the state is present. I.O/SIP Rasool Bux Panhwar is present. He is bound down to attend. NBW against PWs returned unserved. Case adjourned to 26.10.2026 for evidence. Present accused is directed to attend. Repeat NBW against remaining PWs. |
|
| 18 | PPC 294/2026 | The State VS Arif Ali Mangi & others | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | Waseem Ahmed(ADVO-276-SBC-JMS) | PPC-380,PPC-411,PPC-413,PPC-504,PPC-506 | 55/2026 A-Section (Dadu) |
Case called. Accused Arif Ali Mangi, Jahangir @ Jani and Imtiaz Ali are present on bail. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Mr. Ghulam Ali Mughal learned advocate for the accused Jahangir @ Jani is not present. Mr. Waseem Solangi Learned advocate for accused Arif Ali is not present. Mr. Ghulam Nabi Lashari learned advocate for accused Imtiaz Ali is not present. I.O/ASI Rashid Ali Panhwar is present. Learned advocate for the complainant is not present. Application U/s 540 Cr.P.C to call and examine PW Ghulam Murtaza Mallah in this case is pending. Application U/S 265-F Cr.P.C r/w article 46-A & 164 of QSO 1984 for taking on record production and exhibition of USB containing video footage is also pending. Arguments of learned advocate for the informant and learned ADPP for the state have already been heard on the applications 540 Cr.P.C to call and examine PW Ghulam Murtaza Mallah in this case is pending and application U/S 265-F Cr.P.C r/w article 46-A &^ 164 of QSO. The work is suspended by the learned advocates of District Bar Association Dadu and they requested that no adverse order may be passed due to absence of advocates in their cases. Case is adjourned to 31-10-2026 for hearing on the application U/S 540 Cr.P.C & applilcation 165-F Cr.P.C/evidence. Accused are directed to attend. Present ASI Rashid Ali is bound down to attend. Issue B.W against PWs. |
| 19 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 441/2026 | The State VS Daim Lakhair | Jawaid Ali Sahito(ADVO-293-SBC-DDU) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (I) A | 46/2026 B-Section (Dadu) |
Case called. Accused Daim Alkhani is present on bail. Learned advocate for the accused is present. learned ADPP for State are present. Informant ASI Piyar Ali and I.O/ASI Alam Khan Vighio are present and bound down to attned. Summons for remaining PWs returned unserved and extended to the same process server. Today work is suspended by the learned advocates of District Bar Association Dadu and they requested that no adverse order may be passed due to absence of advocates in their cases. Case put off to 24-10-2026 for evidence. Present accused is directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 20 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 2564/2026 | Mst. Shabana Lashari and another VS SSP Dadu and others | Rajib Ali (ADVO-740-SBC-DDU) | Cr.PC-22-B | / |
Crl. Misc: Application U/S 22-BC (ii) Cr.P.C is called. Applicants and their counsel are present. The SHO PS Rukkan submitted his report. Copy of letter issued by the SSP Dadu to SHO PS Rukkan is received. Today work is suspended by the learned advocates of District Bar Association Dadu and they requested that no adverse order may be passed due to absence of advocates in their cases. Matter put off to 24-10-2026 for hearing. Applicants are informed. |
|
| 21 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 2567/2026 | Sadam Hussain Panhwar VS SSP Dadu and others | Sher Khan(ADVO-836-SBC-DDU) | Cr.PC-22-A | / |
Crl. Misc: Application U/s 22-A 6(iii) Cr.P.C is called. Applicant and his counsel are present. The reports are received from the SHO PS Rukkan and SHO PS Phulji Station. Copy of letter issued by the SSP Dadu to the SHO concerned received. Today work is suspended by the learned advocates of District Bar Association Dadu and they requested that no adverse order may be passed due to absence of advocates in their cases. Matter put off to 19-10-2026 for hearing. |
|
| 22 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 2576/2026 | Mst. Sajidan Bhand VS SHO Ps. B-Section Dadu | Waseem Ahmed(ADVO-276-SBC-JMS) | Cr.PC-22-A | / |
Crl. Misc Application U/S 22-A & B Cr.P.C is called. Applicant Mst. Sajidan Bhand is called absent. Mr. Waseem Ahmed Solangi Learned advocate for the applicant is not present. His partner advocate is present. The SHO PS B-Section Dadu and DSP DCRC Dadu submitted their reports. Notice issued for proposed accused returned served upon Nouman Bhand through phone call. He is present. Mr. Niaz Hussain Shahani learned advocate filed vakalatnama on behalf of the proposed accused Nouman Bhand. Order passed thereon. Today work is suspended by the learned advocates of District Bar Association Dadu and they requested that no adverse order may be passed due to absence of advocates in their cases. Matter put off to 19-10-2026 for hearing. |
|
| 23 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 2565/2026 | Imam Ali Chandio VS DSP K.N. Shah | Ghulam Sarwar(ADVO-3146-SBC-HYD) | Cr.PC-22-A | / |
Crl. Misc: Application U/S 22-A & B (i & iii) Cr.P.C is Called. Applicant Imam Ali Chandio and his counsel Mr. Ghulam Sarwar Gadehi are called absent. Proposed accused Muhammad Khan and Qadir Bux Chandio are present. Mr. Rehmatullah Abbassi learned advocate is present, filed vakalatnamas on behalf of above named both proposed accused. Order passed thereon. The SHO PS K.N.Shah and DSP DCRC Dadu submitted his reports. Today work is suspended by the learned advocates of District Bar Association Dadu and they requested that no adverse order may be passed due to absence of advocates in their cases. Matter put off to 21-10-2026 for hearing. The parties are informed. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Misc. Applications | |||||||
| 24 | Illegal Dispos. Act (Illegal Dispossesion Act) 48/2026 | Aftab Ahmed Charan VS Noor Muhammad Abro and others | Ghulam Ali (ADVO-636-SBC-DDU) | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3 | / |
Matter called. Informer Aftab Ahmed Charan is called absent. His counsel is present. Proposed accused Noor Muhmmad Abro and Ameer Ali Siyal are present. Mr. Koura Khan Memon learned advocate for proposed accused is present. The application filed by the complainant for calling record of registered sale deed and the relevant entry kept in Deh form-II is pending. The report of the Mukhtiarkar Taluka Dadu and the SHO PS A-Section Dadu are already received. The work is suspended by the learned advocates of District Bar Association Dadu and they requested that no adverse order may be passed due to absence of advocates in their cases. Matter is adjourned to 24.10.2026 for hearing on the application of the complainant & hearing on the reports. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Final Arguments | |||||||
| 25 | PPC 440/2025 | The State VS Sayed Munwar Ali and another | Abdul Sattar Memon(ADVO-277-SBC-DDU) | PPC-324,PPC-337-F(vi),PPC-34,PPC-504 | 15/2025 Makhdoom Bilawal |
Case called. Accused Munwar Ali Shah and Qurban Ali Shah are present on bail. Mr. Ali Akbar Buriro Learned advocate for accused is not present. His partner advocate is present. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Today work is suspended by the learned advocates of District Bar Association Dadu and they requested that no adverse order may be passed due to absence of advocates in their cases. Case put off to 24-10-2026 for arguments. Accused are directed to attend. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 26 | PPC 317/2026 | The State VS Imtiaz & others | Jawaid Ali Sahito(ADVO-293-SBC-DDU) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | PPC-189,PPC-228,PPC-500,PPC-504,PPC-505,PPC-506 | 102/2026 A-Section (Dadu) |
Case called. Accused Imtiaz, Noman, Dattal, Shakir Masroor, Naseem, Irshad Ali and Ultaf Ali Sahto are present on bail. Accused Manzoor Ali @ Abid Ali, Sajjad Ali @ Sajid Ali and Saqib Rehman are present on interim pre-arrest bail granted by Honourable High Court of Sindh, Circuit Court, Hyderabad. Accused Khalid Hussain is called absent. Co-accused Ali Asghar Panhwar submitted application for excusing absence of absent accused Khalid Hussain. Order passed thereon. Accused Ali Akbar, Hasnain Raza, Asif Ali, Deshi Darya Khan and Comrade Farhan are absconders. The SHO PS A-Section Dadu returned NBW against absconding accused through SIP Shamasuddin Mallah and the same has been extended. ADPP is present. Supplementary challan of accused Manzoor Ali @ Abid Ali, Sajjad Ali @ Sajid Ali and Saqib Rehman is received and the same is kept with main sessions case file. Application U/s 265-K Cr.P.C is pending. The work is suspended by the learned advocates of District Bar Association Dadu and they requested that no adverse order may be passed due to absence of advocates in their cases. Case put off to 31.10.2026 for service/hearing on application U/s 265-K Cr.P.C. Present accused are directed to attend. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | C.Rev. (Civil Revisions) 41/2025 |
WAPDA Executive Engineer Operation Division Dadu & another VS Khushi Muhammad Arain & others | Faheem(ADVO-429-SBC-DDU) | DDA(DDA-004-GOV-MPK) | Civil Revision called. Applicants are called absent. Mr. Faheem Ahmed Ghalloo learned advocate for applicants is not present. Respondent No.1-B is called absent. Mr. Sikandar Ali Soomro learned advocate for respondent No.1-B is not present. Today work is suspended by the learned advocates of District Bar Association Dadu and they requested that no adverse order may be passed due to absence of advocates in their cases. Matter put off to 23-10-2026 for objections by respondent No.1(b)/appearance of remaining respondents. |
||
| 2 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 19/2026 |
Ghulam Hussain Birhmani & others VS P.O of Sindh & others | Ghulam Mustafa(ADVO-687-SBC-DDU) | Civil Appeal called. Attorney of appellants and his counsel are present. Respondents No.10(e) & 14 are not present. Their counsel Mr. Ali Najaf Memon is not present. His assistant is present. Respondents No.1 to 9,10-c, 11 12,12-a &13 have not yet appeared. Learned DDA is present on behalf of respondents No.01 to 08. The work is suspended by the learned advocates of District Bar Association Dadu and they requested that no adverse order may be passed due to absence of advocates in their cases. Matter put off to 31-10-2026 for appearance of respondents No.1 to 9, 10(a),(b), (c), 11 and 12(a) to(d) and 13. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 3 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 115/2025 |
Bakhshal Lund VS P.O of Sindh & others | Faheem(ADVO-429-SBC-DDU) | Civil appeal called. Appellant is present. Learned counsel for appellant is called absent. DDA is present on behalf of official respondents No.1 to 5. Authorized person of defendant No.17 is not present. Mr. Habib Ali Leghari learned advocate on behalf of the respondent No.10 ( also attorney of respondents No.6 to 9 & 12 to 15) is called absent. Respondents No. 16(17) have not yet filed objections. The work is suspended by the learned advocates of District Bar Association Dadu and they requested that no adverse order may be passed due to absence of advocates in their cases. Matter is adjourned to 28.10.2026 for objections of respondents No. 16(17), if any. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 4 | Ist Class Civil Suits 15/2026 |
Zahid Ali Panhwar VS Shahjhan Channa and an other | Faheem(ADVO-429-SBC-DDU) | Suit called. Plaintiff Zahid Ali Panhwar is present. Mr. Faheem Ahmed Ghalloo learned counsel for the plaintiff is called absent. His partner advocate is present. Defendant No.01 is called absent. Court motion notice is returned served upon advocate for defendat No.01. Mr. Ghulam Ali Mughal learned advocate for defendant No.01 is present. Today work is suspended by the learned advocates of District Bar Association Dadu and they requested that no adverse order may be passed due to absence of advocates in their cases. Matter adjourned to 27-10-2026 for plaintiff???s side evidence. |
|||
| 5 | Summary Suits 17/2026 |
Shahjahan Channa VS Zahid Ali Panhwar | Imran Ali (ADVO-1048-SBC-DDU) | Faheem(ADVO-429-SBC-DDU) | Summary Suit is called. Plaintiff and his counsel are called absent. Defendant Zahid Ali Panhwar is present. Learned advocate for the defendant is called absent. His partner advocate is present. Today work is suspended by the learned advocates of District Bar Association Dadu and they requested that no adverse order may be passed due to absence of advocates in their cases. Matter put off to 27.10.2026 for plaintiff side evidence. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 6 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 93/2024 |
Muhammad Umar Bhand and others VS Province of Sindh and others | Sikander Ali(ADVO-504-SBC-DDU) | Ali Abbas(ADVO-339-SBC-DDU),Mufeed Ahmed (ADVO-702-SBC-DDU),Niaz Hussain(ADVO-486-SBC-DDU) | Matter called. Appellant No.1 is said to have expired. Appellant No.3 namely Akram Ali Bhand, who is attorney of appellant No.1 and 2 is not present. Mr. Sikandar Ali Soomro learned advocate for appellants is called absent. DDA is present on behalf of Official Respondents No.01 to 7. Respondent No.32 (a) namely Naseeruddin Bhand, who is attorney of respondents No. 8,9 (a), 23, and 32 (b) is not present. Mr. Mushtaque Ahmed Solangi, advocate for respondent Nos.8,9 (a), 23, 32 (a) and 32 (b) is not present. Mr. Ali Abass Kabooro advocate for respondent No.20 is not present. Mr. Niaz Hussain Shahani advocate for respondent No.29 (a) is not present. Today work is suspended by the learned advocates of District Bar Association Dadu and they requested that no adverse order may be passed due to absence of advocates in their cases. Matter Put off to 23.10.2026 for hearing on main appeal. |
||