| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 2400/2025 | Abdul Razzaque Jatoi & others VS The State | Faiz Ahmed Shah(ADVO-139-SBC-DDU) | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | Cr.PC-498 | 305/2025 A-Section (Dadu) |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 2 | SC (Murder Trial) 97/2025 | The State VS Saddam Hussain Pirzado | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK),Safdar Ali(ADVO-413-SBC-DDU) | Faiz Ahmed Shah(ADVO-139-SBC-DDU) | PPC-302,PPC-34,PPC-397 | 1/2025 Jhallo |
Case called. Accused Sadam Hussain Pirzado is produced from C.P. Hyderabad. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Mr. Sayed Faiz Ahmed Shah learned advocate for accused Sadam Hussain is present. Mr. Safdar Ali Charan learned advocate for the complainant is present. Complainant Abdul Sattar Khoso, P.W Abdul Hakeem and Inspector/I.O Muhammad Tarique Khuhro are called absent. B.W issued against remaining PW returned back un-served. (The joint charge in this main murder case and the connected case of recovery has been framed). Comments from Superintendent District Jail Dadu. Order passed on it. Which is kept on record. The accused was reported to have been shifted to Hyderabad on the ground that he was creating law and order situation, his behavior was not proper with the jail officers and was found to be unbecoming. However later on accused submitted application before this court undertaking that he will mend his ways and would not create any untoward situation at Dadu and requested that his custody may be shifted from Hyderabad to DADU. Accordingly comments were called from Superintendent District Jail Dadu who has strongly not recommended for his shifting. I have heard UTP In person who has disclosed that he will not create any untoward situation in jail and live peacefully there, accordingly he is directed to be shifted to District Jail Dadu under intimation to both jail authorities so that his trial may be completed at earliest. Case is adjourned to 29.11.2025 for evidence. Repeat B.W against all P.Ws, including Dr. Accused produced in custody is returned back to the jail concerned with directions to be produced on next date. |
| 3 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 98/2025 | The State VS Sadam Hussain Pirzado | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | Faiz Ahmed Shah(ADVO-139-SBC-DDU) | Sindh Arms Act 2013-25 | 2/2025 Jhallo |
Case called. Accused Sadam Hussain Pirzado is produced from C.P. Hyderabad. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Mr. Sayed Faiz Ahmed Shah learned advocate for accused Sadam Hussain is present. (The joint charge in this main murder case and the connected case of recovery has been framed). Summons issued against PWs, returned unserved. No PWs is present. The main Case is adjourned, hence this case is also adjourned to 29.11.2025 for evidence. Issue summons against remaining PWs. Accused produced in custody is returned back to the jail concerned with directions to be produced on next date. |
| 4 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 724/2025 | The State VS Ashique Ali Janweri | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | Zulfiqar Ali(ADVO-317-SBC-DDU) | Special Case Narcotics -9(1) 3 (a) | 39/2025 Mehar |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Supply of Copies | |||||||
| 5 | PPC 952/2025 | The State VS Talib Hussain Chandio & Others | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | Muhammad Asad(ADVO-834-SBC-DDU) | PPC-114,PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-324,PPC-337-B,PPC-452 | 47/2025 Rukkan |
R&Ps received from the Court of Honourable Sessions Judge, Dadu, for its disposal according to law. Case called. Accused 01. Talib Hussain 02. Abid Hussain and 03. Anwar are present on bail. Accused 04. Adil and 05. Imdad are produced in custody from District Prison Dadu. While accused Rafique and Rasheed are already declared as proclaimed offenders. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Mr. Muhammad Asad Shahani, learned advocate for accused Abid Hussain remained absent. Mr. Ali Bux Solangi, learned advocate for accused Talib Hussain Chandio remained absent. Mr. Waqar Ali Solangi, learned advocate for accused Anwar Ali Chandio is present. In compliance of section U/S 265-C Cr.PC. Copies of case papers has been supplied to accused vide receipt No.02. Put off to..08.12.2025 for framing of charge. Accused present on bail are directed to attend. Accused produced in custody are remanded back to District Prison Dadu with direction to produce them on next date. |
| 6 | PPC 939/2025 | The State VS Arbab Khoso and others | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | Muhammad Usman(ADVO-632-SBC-DDU) | PPC-337-Fiii,PPC-397 | 67/2025 Khudabad |
R&Ps received from Honourable Sessions Judge, Dadu, by way of transfer, for its disposal according to law. Case called. Accused Arbab and Hussain are produced from District prions Dadu. Accused Sahib Khan is produced from CP Hyderabad. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Mr. Muhammad Usman Chandio, learned advocate for accused Hussain Jamali remained absent. In compliance of section U/S 265-C Cr.P.C. Copies of case papers has been supplied to accused vide receipt No.2. Put off to.13.12.2025 for framing of charge. Accused produced under custody are remanded back to their respective jails with directions to produce on the next date of hearing. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 7 | PPC 905/2025 | The State VS Hussain Bux @ Muhammad Hussain & Others | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | PPC-397 | 66/2025 Kakar |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Statement on Oath / D.W. | |||||||
| 8 | SC (Murder Trial) 176/2024 | The State VS Inspector Noor Mustafa Pathan and Others | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | Athar Abbas Solangi(ADVO-478-SBC-LRK),Faheem(ADVO-429-SBC-DDU),Sikander Ali(ADVO-504-SBC-DDU) | PPC-109,PPC-201.,PPC-302,PPC-34,PPC-344 | 97/2022 B-Section (Dadu) |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Final Arguments | |||||||
| 9 | SC (Murder Trial) 310/2020 | The State VS Sikandar Chandio & others | ADPP(ADPP-0013-GOV-SUK),Salah Uddin(ADVO-14025-SBC-KHS) | Amjad Hussain Meo(ADVO-2564-SBC-HYD),Athar Abbas Solangi(ADVO-478-SBC-LRK),Ayaz Hussain Tunio(ADVO-2649-SBC-HYD),Iftikhar Ahmed Shah(ADVO-17182-SBC-KHS),Muhammad Usman(ADVO-632-SBC-DDU),Safdar Ali Bhutto(ADVO-185-SBC-LRK),Shahab Sarki(ADVO-4489-SBC-KHS),Sikander Ali(ADVO-504-SBC-DDU),Waseem Ahmed(ADVO-276-SBC-JMS) | PPC-109,PPC-114,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-302,PPC-504 | 20/2018 Mehar |
Case called. Accused Sikandar, Ali Gohar, Zulifquar, Ghulam Murtaza Chandio are produced in custody from District Prison, Dadu. Accused Sardar Khan Chandio, Burhan Khan Chandio, Abdul Sattar Chandio, Abdul Karim @ Karim Bux Chandio are present on bail. Mr. Atahar Abbass Solangi Learned advocate for accused Sardar Khan Chandio, Ali Gohar and Burhan Khan Chandio remained absent. Mr. Safdar Ali G. Bhutto, learned counsel for accused Zulfiquar Chandio and Sikandar Chandio remained absent. Mr. Ayaz Hussain Tunio, learned counsel for accused Ghulam Murtaza Chandio remained absent. Mr. Shahab Sarki, learned counsel for accused Burhan Chandio remained absent. Mr. Iftikhar Ahmed Shah Learned advocate for accused Abdul Kareem alias Kareem Bux Chandio & also for accused Burhan Khan remained absent. Mr. Sikandar Ali Soomro learned advocate for accused Abdul Sattar Chandio is present. Mr. Muhammad Usman Chandio learned advocate appointed on behalf of the all accused persons on state expenses remained absent. Learned ADPP for the State is present. Complainant Pervaiz Ahmed Chandio remained absent. Mr. Salahuddin Panhwar, learned counsel for the complainant remained absent. Hence case is adjourned, with rider that in case of failure to argue the matter by either side on next date the matter will be fixed for Judgment. Put off to 06.12.2025 for further arguments of parties. The UTPs/accused produced in custody are remanded back to the Jail concerned with directions to be produced on the date of hearing. Accused present on bail are directed to attend. However after case was adjourned, Mr. Safdar Ali G. Bhutto, learned counsel for accused Zulfiquar Chandio and Sikandar Chandio put his appearance and is informed accordingly. |
| 10 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 957/2023 | The State VS Inspector Noor Mustafa Pathan & Others | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | Athar Abbas Solangi(ADVO-478-SBC-LRK),Faheem(ADVO-429-SBC-DDU),Sikander Ali(ADVO-504-SBC-DDU) | SINDH ARMS ACT-25-A | 98/2022 B-Section (Dadu) |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 1 | Summary Suits 31/2025 |
Abdul Jabbar Chandio VS Sajid Jameel Rajput | Tofique Ahmed (ADVO-19698-SBC-KHS) | Rashid Hussain(ADVO-362-SBC-DDU) | Summary Suit called. Plaintiff Abdul Jabbar Chandio remained absent. Mr. Tofique Ahmed Solangi, learned advocate for plaintiff is present. Defendant namely Sajid Jameel Rajput is produced in custody in an other Court in Dadu. Mr. Rashid Hussain Ghaloo, learned advocate for defendant namely Sajid Jameel Rajput is present and submitted application U/O XXXVII Rule 3 CPC R/W 151 Civil Procedure Code 1908 for grant of leave to appear & defend the suit. Order passed on it. Notice to other side. learned advocate for plaintiff received copy application leave to defend. Matter is adjourned to 06.12.2025 for objections on application U/O XXXVII Rule 3 CPC R/W 151 Civil Procedure Code 1908 for grant of leave to appear & defend the suit. |
||