| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | PPC 90/2025 | The State VS Imdad Ali & anr | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-MLR) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | PPC-337-H,PPC-34,PPC-342,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | 13/2025 Sultanabad(TAY) |
Case called in open Court. Accused Imdad is present on bail while accused Sudheer is already declared as proclaimed offender vide order dated, 30-7-2025. Learned advocate for accused and learned ADPP for the state are present. Complainant Muhammad Ramzan is present. Learned counsel for accused has submitted application for adjournment. Order passed thereon. Put off to???.14-2-2026 for evidence. Accused is directed to attend. Repeat summon to all PWs including complainant as before. |
| 2 | PPC 108/2025 | The State VS Wazeer Ali @ Bagu | Mangal(ADVO-3878-SBC-HYD) | Munawar Ali (ADVO-5406-SBC-HYD) | PPC-380,PPC-457,PPC-511 | 84/2025 Umar Sand |
Case called in open Court. Accused Wazir Ali is present on bail. Learned advocate for accused called absent and learned ADPP for the stare is present while learned advocate assisting the prosecution is present. Process viz: summon returned duly served. PW/I.O/ASI-Ghulam Qadir is present. On the verbal request of accused persons matter is adjourned and put off to??????11-2-2026 for evidence. Accused is directed to attend. Repeat summon to remaining PWs/Abdul Haee and ASI-Ghulam Qadir as before. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 3 | Other CR/Sessions Cases (If Any) 15/2026 | The State VS Mazan Brohi | Abdul Hafeez Ghori(ADVO-1595-SBC-HYD) | Munawar Ali (ADVO-5406-SBC-HYD) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 79/2025 Sultanabad(TAY) |
Case called in open Court. Accused Maaz Brohi is present on bail. Learned advocate for accused and learned ADPP for the state are present. Charge framed against accused at Ex???2; his plea was recorded separately at Ex???.2/A wherein the pleaded not guilty and claimed for trial. Process viz: summon returned duly served. All PWs are present. Deposition of complainant SIP-Abdul Haleem recorded at Ex???3. Deposition of PW/PC-Amanullah recorded at Ex???.4 and deposition of PW/PC-Mashooque Ali recorded at Ex???.5. Learned ADPP for the state has submitted statement regarding to close the side of prosecution evidence at Ex???.6. Order passed thereon. File. Statement of accused u/s 342-Cr.PC recorded at Ex???.7. Arguments heard. Judgment passed at Ex???..8; and announced in the open Court. Accused Maaz Brohi son of Muhammad Ghulam is acquitted u/s 245(i) Cr.PC. Accused is present on bail; his bail bond stands cancelled and surety is discharged. |
| 4 | Other CR/Sessions Cases (If Any) 14/2026 | The State VS Javed | Abdul Hafeez Ghori(ADVO-1595-SBC-HYD) | Munawar Ali (ADVO-5406-SBC-HYD) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 78/2025 Sultanabad(TAY) |
Case called in open Court. Accused Jawaid is present on bail. Learned advocate for accused and learned ADPP for the state are present. Charge framed against accused at Ex???2; his plea was recorded separately at Ex???.2/A wherein the pleaded not guilty and claimed for trial. Process viz: summon returned duly served. All PWs are present. Deposition of complainant SIP-Abdul Haleem recorded at Ex???3. Deposition of PW/PC-Khadim Hussain recorded at Ex???.4 and deposition of PW/PC-Mashooque Ali recorded at Ex???.5. Learned ADPP for the state has submitted statement regarding to close the side of prosecution evidence at Ex???.6. Order passed thereon. File. Statement of accused u/s 342-Cr.PC recorded at Ex???.7. Arguments heard. Judgment passed at Ex???..8; and announced in the open Court. Accused Jawaid son of Muhammad Bux is acquitted u/s 245(i) Cr.PC. Accused is present on bail; his bail bond stands cancelled and surety is discharged. |
| 5 | Prohibition Ord. (Prohibition Ordinance (3/4)) 17/2026 | The State VS Muhammad Haroon & others | Abdul Hafeez Ghori(ADVO-1595-SBC-HYD) | Munir Hussain(ADVO-1159-SBC-HYD) | 76/2025 Sultanabad(TAY) |
Case called in open Court. Accused persons namely; Muhammad Haroon is present on bail NBW against accused Aijaz Ali and Mumtaz Ali returned un-executed; but they are also present on bail while case against absconder accused Ghulam Nabi is already bi-furcated vide order dated, 7-1-2026 and proceeded separately. Learned advocate for accused called absent and learned ADPP for the state is present. Charge framed against present accused persons namely; Muhammad Haroon, Aijaz Ali and Mumtaz Ali at Ex???2; their pleas were recorded separately at Ex???2/A to Ex???2/C wherein they pleaded not guilty and claimed for trial. Put off to???.16-2-2026 for evidence. Present accused are directed to attend. Issue summon to all PWs. Call case property and chemical examiner???s report. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Final Arguments | |||||||
| 6 | PPC 26/2025 | The State VS Ghulam Rasool & others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI) | PPC-337-Fiv,PPC-504 | 8/2025 Sultanabad(TAY) |
Case called in open Court. Both accused Ghulam Rasool and Faisal are present on bail. Learned advocate for accused and learned ADPP for the state are present while learned advocate assisting the prosecution is also present. Final arguments heard. Learned advocates both the parties have submitted statements alongwith PSCs of case laws. Order passed thereon. File. Put off to???.17-2-2026 for judgment. Both accused are directed to attend. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 5/2026 | Muhammad Junaid VS Mst. Mubashira & others | Muhammad Azam (ADVO-4269-SBC-HYD) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 (For Custody) | Guardianship Application called in open Court. Applicant and learned counsel for applicant are present. Opponent called absent. Process viz: notice not issued though cost not deposited. Learned counsel for applicant has submitted statement regarding to withdraw of present guardianship application. Order passed on separate sheet. In view of statement Instant G.A. is disposed of as withdrawn accordingly. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 2 | F.S. (Family Suits) 12/2026 | Mst. Dua VS Ghulam Mustafa | Muhammad Tarique (ADVO-74-SBC-TAY) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Matter called in open Court. Plaintiff called absent. Learned counsel for plaintiff is present. The service upon defendant was held good vide order dated, 20-1-2026. But defendant called absent. In the interest of justice, matter is adjourned and put off to???.9-2-2026 for appearance of defendant and for filing written statement/objections. |
|
| 3 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 3/2026 | Mst. Shabnum VS Irfanullah & others | Aghis-u-Salam(ADVO-1773-SBC-HYD) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 10,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 29 Guardian and wards Act 1890 for permission of sale,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 7 | Guardianship application called in open Court. Applicant called absent. Learned counsel for applicant is present. The service upon opponents was held good vide order dated, 21-1-2026. But Opponents called absent. In the interest of justice, matter is adjourned and put off to???..14-2-2026 for appearance of opponents and for filing written statement/objections. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 4 | F.S. (Family Suits) 139/2023 | Mst Naeema D/o Bundo Khan VS Tariq S/o Hashmat Dad | Amir Ahmed Jonejo(ADVO-9-SBC-TAY) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family suit called in open Court. Plaintiff called absent. Learned counsel for plaintiff is present. Defendant and learned counsel for defendant called absent. Work is suspended observed by District Bar Tando Allahyar. Put off to???..12-2-2026 for defendant???s side evidence. |
||
| 5 | F.S. (Family Suits) 88/2025 | Sht. Meena VS Raju | Mumtaz Ali(ADVO-170-SBC-TAY) | Syed Sajjad Ali Shah(ADVO-113-SBC-TAY) | Family Suit-Suit for Judicial Separation of Marriage,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family suit called in open Court. Plaintiff called absent. Learned counsel for plaintiff is present. Defendant and learned counsel for defendant are present. Work is suspend observed by District Bar Tando Allahyar. With mutual consent of learned counsels for both the parties. Put off to??????13-2-2026 for plaintiff???s side evidence as well as for hearing on application to withdraw from past and future maintenance. |
|
| 6 | F.S. (Family Suits) 101/2025 | Mst Reema VS Muhammad Aslam Qureshi | Amir Ahmed Jonejo(ADVO-9-SBC-TAY) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family Suit called in open Court. Plaintiff and learned counsel for plaintiff are called absent. Defendant and learned counsel for defendant are present. Learned counsel for plaintiff has sent adjournment application. Order passed thereon. Put off to???..14-2-2026 for plaintiff???s side evidence. |
|
| 7 | F.S. (Family Suits) 117/2025 | Mst. Shabina VS Ghulam Muhammad | Ali Raza (ADVO-259-SBC-TAY) | Mukhtiar Ahmed Jarwar() | Family Suit-Recovery of Maintenance of Iddat Period,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family suit called in open Court. Plaintiff and learned counsel for plaintiff are present. Defendant and learned counsel for defendant are called absent. Learned counsel for defendant has sent adjournment application. Order passed thereon. Put off to???..16-2-2026 for cross examination of plaintiff as well as for plaintiff???s side evidence. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Further Proceedings | |||||||
| 8 | F.S. (Family Suits) 82/2025 | Mst. Shabana Bibi & others VS Amir Ali | Syed Kashif Iqbal (ADVO-147-SBC-TAY) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Family suit called in open Court. Plaintiff & learned counsel for plaintiff are called absent. Learned counsel for defendant is present. Work is suspended observed by District Bar Tando Allahyar. Put off to???.12-2-2026 for filing of amended plaint. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 9 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 4/2026 | Fahad VS Mst. Shabana Shah | Bashir Ahmed(ADVO-256-SBC-TAY) | Mohammad Aslam Solangi() | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 (For Custody) | Guardianship application called in open Court. Applicant is present alongwith her learned counsel. Learned counsel for applicant has submitted statement alongwith daily IBRAT newspaper duly published the notice. Order passed thereon. File. Process viz: notice returned duly served. Opponent Mst.Shabana Shah is present. Mr.Muhammad Aslam Solangi advocate has appeared before this Court and filed Vakalatnama on behalf of opponent. Order passed thereon. File. On the verbal request of learned counsel for opponent. Matter is adjourned and put off to???.12-2-2026 for filing written statement/objections. |
|