| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 92/2026 | Harchand Kachi Kolhi VS The State | Mumtaz Ali(ADVO-170-SBC-TAY) | Abdul Hafeez Ghori(ADVO-1595-SBC-HYD) | Cr.PC-497,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 56/2026 Sultanabad(TAY) |
Criminal bail application u/s 497-Cr.PC called in open Court. Learned advocate for applicant/accused and learned ADPP for the state are present. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in the open Court. Bail granted to applicant/accused; Harchand subject to furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs.20000/ (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with P.R bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of this Court. |
| 2 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 93/2026 | Abdul Hafeez VS The State | Anwar Ali (ADVO-70-SBC-TAY) | Abdul Hafeez Ghori(ADVO-1595-SBC-HYD) | Cr.PC-497,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 57/2026 Sultanabad(TAY) |
Criminal bail application u/s 497-Cr.PC called in open Court. Learned advocate for applicant/accused and learned ADPP for the state are present. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in the open Court. Bail granted to applicant/accused Abdul Hafeez; subject to furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs.20000/ (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with P.R bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of this Court. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 3 | PPC 6/2026 | The State VS Akbar Shah & Another | Abdul Hafeez Ghori(ADVO-1595-SBC-HYD) | Syed Sajjad Ali Shah(ADVO-113-SBC-TAY) | PPC-34,PPC-380,PPC-457 | 104/2025 Umar Sand |
Case called in open Court. Accused Akbar Shah called absent while presence of juvenile offender Zaheer Ahmed is already exempted during the stage of prosecution evidence vide order dated, 15-1-2026. Learned advocate for accused and learned ADPP for the state are present while learned advocate assisting the prosecution is also present. No any PW is in attendance. Put off to???..3-9-2026 for evidence. Issue NBW against accused Akbar Shah and notice to his surety. Repeat summon to all PWs including complainant as before. |
| 4 | Prohibition Ord. (Prohibition Ordinance (3/4)) 104/2026 | The State VS Sameer @ Adeel | Abdul Hafeez Ghori(ADVO-1595-SBC-HYD) | Munir Hussain(ADVO-1159-SBC-HYD) | Prohibition (Enforcement Of Hadd) Order, 1979-3,Prohibition (Enforcement Of Hadd) Order, 1979-4 | 47/2026 Sultanabad(TAY) |
Case called in open Court. Accused Sameer @ Adeel called absent. Learned advocate for accused called absent and learned ADPP for the state is present. No any PW is in attendance. Put off to???22-8-2026 for evidence. Issue BW against accused. Issue summon to remaining PWs as before. Call case property and chemical examiner???s report. |
| 5 | Other CR/Sessions Cases (If Any) 107/2026 | The State VS Gordhan Bheel | Abdul Hafeez Ghori(ADVO-1595-SBC-HYD) | Aurangzaib(ADVO-196-SBC-TAY) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 42/2026 Sultanabad(TAY) |
Case called in open Court. Accused Gordhan is present on bail. Learned advocate for accused and learned ADPP for the state are present. Charge framed against accused at Ex???.2; his plea was recorded separately at Ex???.2/A wherein he pleaded not guilty and claimed for trial. Process viz: summon returned duly served. All PWs are present. Deposition of complainant SIP-Shabbir Ahmed recorded at Ex???.3. Deposition of PW/PC-Sajjad Ali recorded at Ex???4 and deposition of PW/PC-Mashooque Ali recorded at Ex???.5. Learned ADPP for the state has submitted statement regarding to close the side of prosecution evidence at Ex???.6. Order passed thereon. File. Statement u/s 342-Cr.PC of accused recorded at Ex???..7. Put off to???..24-8-2026 for arguments. Accused is directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 6 | PPC 99/2026 | The State VS Khadim Hussain & Another | Abdul Hafeez Ghori(ADVO-1595-SBC-HYD) | PPC-34,PPC-382,PPC-447,PPC-506-B | 51/2026 Umar Sand |
Case called in open Court. Both accused Khadim Hussain and Fayaz Hussain are present on bail. Mr.Muhammad Hakeem Mastoi advocate has appeared before this Court and filed Vakalatnama on behalf of both accused. Order passed thereon. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Charge framed against both accused at Ex???..2; their pleas were recorded separately at Ex???2/A and at Ex???.2/B wherein they pleaded not guilty and claimed for trial. Put off to???..24-8-2026 for evidence. Both accused are directed to attend. Issue summon to all PWs. |
|
| 7 | Other CR/Sessions Cases (If Any) 112/2026 | The State VS Zubair Ahmed | Abdul Hafeez Ghori(ADVO-1595-SBC-HYD) | Anwar Ali (ADVO-70-SBC-TAY) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 49/2026 Sultanabad(TAY) |
Case called in open Court. Accused Zubair Ahmed is present on bail. Learned advocate for accused and learned ADPP for the state are present. Charge framed against accused at Ex???.2; his plea was recorded separately at Ex???.2/A wherein he pleaded not guilty and claimed for trial. Process viz: summon returned duly served. All PWs are present. Deposition of complainant ASI-Jay Ram Das recorded at Ex???.3. Deposition of PW/PC-Sajid Ali recorded at Ex???4 and deposition of PW/SIP-Muhammad Yaseen recorded at Ex???.5. Learned ADPP for the state has submitted statement regarding to close the side of prosecution evidence at Ex???.6. Order passed thereon. Statement u/s 342-Cr.PC of accused recorded at Ex???..7. Arguments heard. Judgment passed at Ex???.8; and announced in the open Court. Accused Zubair Ahmed son of Raheem Bux is acquitted u/s 245(i) Cr.PC. Accused is present on bail his bail bond stands cancelled and surety is discharged. |
| 8 | Other CR/Sessions Cases (If Any) 113/2026 | The State VS Diya Ram Kolhi | Abdul Hafeez Ghori(ADVO-1595-SBC-HYD) | Khadim Hussain(ADVO-3424-SBC-HYD) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 43/2026 Sultanabad(TAY) |
Case called in open Court. Accused Daya Rama is present on bail. Learned advocate for accused and learned ADPP for the state are present. Charge framed against accused at Ex???.2; his plea was recorded separately at Ex???.2/A wherein he pleaded not guilty and claimed for trial. Process viz: summon returned duly served. All PWs are present. Deposition of complainant ASI-Jay Ram Das recorded at Ex???.3. Deposition of PW/PC-Khan Muhammad recorded at Ex???4 and deposition of PW/SIP-Muhammad Yaseen recorded at Ex???.5. Learned ADPP for the state has submitted statement regarding to close the side of prosecution evidence at Ex???.5. Order passed thereon. Statement u/s 342-Cr.PC of accused recorded at Ex???..6. Arguments heard. Judgment passed at Ex???.7; and announced in the open Court. Accused Daya Ram son of Bhoro Kolhi is acquitted u/s 245(i) Cr.PC. Accused is present on bail his bail bond stands cancelled and surety is discharged. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 1 | F.S. (Family Suits) 72/2026 | Mst. Nimra & others VS Sajid | Ghulam Murtaza(ADVO-39-SBC-TAY) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Family suit called in open Court. Both the parties and their learned counsels are present. Learned counsel for defendant has submitted adjournment application. Order passed thereon. Put off to???.29-8-2026 for filing written statement/objections. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 2 | F.S. (Family Suits) 73/2025 | Mst. Sajida & another VS Shahid Hussain | Mehboob Ali Shah(ADVO-122-SBC-TAY) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family suit called in open Court. Plaintiff called absent learned counsel for plaintiff is present. Defendant called absent. Learned counsel for defendant is present. Learned counsel for defendant has sent application for grant of time. Order passed thereon. Put off to???..4-9-2026 for filing objections on application u/s 17-A of the Family Curt Act 1964, for striking off the defence of the defendant and decreeing the suit on account of deliberate and persistent default in payment of interim maintenance and for cross examination of plaintiff and her witness. |
|
| 3 | F.S. (Family Suits) 101/2025 | Mst Reema VS Muhammad Aslam Qureshi | Amir Ahmed Jonejo(ADVO-9-SBC-TAY) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family suit called in open Court. Plaintiff & learned counsel for plaintiff are called absent. Defendant and learned counsel for defendant are presenqt. Learned counsel for plaintiff has sent adjournment application. Order passed thereon. Put off to???.22-8-2026 for plaintiff???s side evidence/further proceedings. |
|
| 4 | F.S. (Family Suits) 36/2026 | Mst.Shumaila VS Muhammad Akram | Aghis-u-Salam(ADVO-1773-SBC-HYD) | Muhammad Shahbaz(ADVO-111-SBC-TAY) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Family suit called in open Court. Both the parties and their learned counsels are present. Learned counsel for defendant has filed objections on the application u/s 151-CPC. Order passed thereon. Copy to other side. Learned counsel for defendant has also filed application u/o VII Rule XI of CPC alongwith affidavit of defendant. Order passed thereon. Put off to???.22-8-2026 for hearing on application u/s 151 CPC as well as for filing objection on application u/o VII Rule XI of CPC so also for cross examination of plaintiff. |
|
| 5 | F.S. (Family Suits) 26/2026 | Mst. Nimra & another VS Lal Khan | Subhan Ali (ADVO-86-SBC-TAY) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family suit called in open Court. Plaintiff called absent. Learned counsel for plaintiff is present. Defendant is present; his learned counsel called absent and he has sent adjournment application. Order passed thereon. Put off to???..28-8-2026 for defendant???s side evidence. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Post-Trial | |||||||
| 6 | F.S. (Family Suits) 77/2025 | Sht Keli VS Setho | Syed Sajjad Ali Shah(ADVO-113-SBC-TAY) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Family suit called in open Court. Both the parties and their learned counsels are present. Post-trial held between both the parties; but declared failed. Arguments heard of learned counsel for plaintiff. Put off to???29-8-2026 for arguments of learned counsel for defendant. |
|