Case Called. Learned counsel for the plaintiff is absent. DDA is present on behalf of the defendant No.1. Learned counsel for the defendant No.2&4 is present. Learned counsel for the defendant No.3&5 is present. None is present from the side of remaining defendants. Case is adjourned to 04.10.2025 for filling amended plaint.

Execution Application called. Learned counsel for the Applicant/DH is present and submitted statement, in which stated that the Applicant/DH has received the possession of the demised shop and the execution application may be disposed off. Bailiff returned writ of possession with roznamahca. Order passed on separate order sheet. From the perusal of record, it is reflected that from the Bailiff report that possession of demised shop was handed over to the Applicant/DH on 17.09.2025, whereas in the same report, the statement of the Applicant/DH is also written wherein who stated that Applicant/DH received the possession of demised shop on 17.09.2025. Keeping in view the above facts and circumstances and statement submitted by learned counsel for Applicant/DH, it is reflected that the instant execution application is satisfied and the Applicant/DH received the possession of demised shop. Therefore, the execution application is disposed of as satisfied. There is no order as to cost. Let the R&Ps be consigned to record room.

Execution Application called. Learned counsel for the Applicant/DH is present and submitted statement, in which stated that the Applicant/DH has received the possession of the demised shop and the execution application may be disposed off. Bailiff returned writ of possession with roznamahca. Order passed on separate order sheet. From the perusal of record, it is reflected that from the Bailiff report that possession of demised shop was handed over to the Applicant/DH on 17.09.2025, whereas in the same report, the statement of the Applicant/DH is also written wherein who stated that Applicant/DH received the possession of demised shop on 17.09.2025. Keeping in view the above facts and circumstances and statement submitted by learned counsel for Applicant/DH, it is reflected that the instant execution application is satisfied and the Applicant/DH received the possession of demised shop. Therefore, the execution application is disposed of as satisfied. There is no order as to cost. Let the R&Ps be consigned to record room.

Execution Application called. Learned counsel for the Applicant/DH is present and submitted statement, in which stated that the Applicant/DH has received the possession of the demised shop and the execution application may be disposed off. Bailiff returned writ of possession with roznamahca. Order passed on separate order sheet. From the perusal of record, it is reflected that from the Bailiff report that possession of demised shop was handed over to the Applicant/DH on 17.09.2025, whereas in the same report, the statement of the Applicant/DH is also written wherein who stated that Applicant/DH received the possession of demised shop on 17.09.2025. Keeping in view the above facts and circumstances and statement submitted by learned counsel for Applicant/DH, it is reflected that the instant execution application is satisfied and the Applicant/DH received the possession of demised shop. Therefore, the execution application is disposed of as satisfied. There is no order as to cost. Let the R&Ps be consigned to record room.

Execution Application called. Learned counsel for the Applicant/DH is present and submitted statement, in which stated that the Applicant/DH has received the possession of the demised shop and the execution application may be disposed off. Bailiff returned writ of possession with roznamahca. Order passed on separate order sheet. From the perusal of record, it is reflected that from the Bailiff report that possession of demised shop was handed over to the Applicant/DH on 17.09.2025, whereas in the same report, the statement of the Applicant/DH is also written wherein who stated that Applicant/DH received the possession of demised shop on 17.09.2025. Keeping in view the above facts and circumstances and statement submitted by learned counsel for Applicant/DH, it is reflected that the instant execution application is satisfied and the Applicant/DH received the possession of demised shop. Therefore, the execution application is disposed of as satisfied. There is no order as to cost. Let the R&Ps be consigned to record room.

Execution Application called. Learned counsel for the Applicant/DH is present and submitted statement, in which stated that the Applicant/DH has received the possession of the demised shop and the execution application may be disposed off. Bailiff returned writ of possession with roznamahca. Order passed on separate order sheet. From the perusal of record, it is reflected that from the Bailiff report that possession of demised shop was handed over to the Applicant/DH on 17.09.2025, whereas in the same report, the statement of the Applicant/DH is also written wherein who stated that Applicant/DH received the possession of demised shop on 17.09.2025. Keeping in view the above facts and circumstances and statement submitted by learned counsel for Applicant/DH, it is reflected that the instant execution application is satisfied and the Applicant/DH received the possession of demised shop. Therefore, the execution application is disposed of as satisfied. There is no order as to cost. Let the R&Ps be consigned to record room.

Case Called. Counsel for the plaintiff is present. Counsel for the defendant No. 1 & 2 is present. Case is adjourned to 14.10.2025 for service on defendant no.03 & 04 through Bailiff, TCS & Redg A/D.

Case called. Plaintiff and learned counsel for the plaintiff are called absent. Order passed on separate order sheet. The perusal of record shows that the matter is fixed for service upon defendants since 31.05.2025, but plaintiff failed to get service upon the defendants as per directions vide order dated 31.05.2025 passed by this court. Further it appears that plaintiff has failed to deposit the costs for service nor obtained time for payment of cost. It appears that plaintiff has lost interest to proceed the matter against the defendants and made default to comply the directions of this court since last various dates of hearing. In view of upshot circumstances and reasons, I have no other alternate but to dismiss the suit of plaintiff due to non-prosecution and default under order 9 Rule 2&3 CPC in the interest of justice. Order accordingly.

Case Called. Counsel for the applicant is present. None is present from opponent side. Let the notice on cost against opponent through publication. Matter is put off to 10.10.2025 for Service through publication.

Execution called. Counsel for the plaintiff D/H is absent. Process returned as per bailiff report. Order passed on it. Repeat upon defendant No 2,3,4,5, and 6 through pointaion as well as pasting in presence of two witness along with photographs. Advocate for the J/D No 01 (KDA) is present. None is present from remaining J/Ds side. Matter is next fixed on 10.10.2025 for service.

Case called. Advocate for the plaintiff is present. Advocate for the all defendants is present. Case is put up to 14.10.2025 for written statement.

Case called. Advocate for the plaintiff is present. Summons/notice returned as per bailiff report. Order passed thereon. The Repeat reveals that the defendant are not reside on the said address. Plaintiff is directer to furnish fresh address s the defendant No 01 and 02 for apropos and effective service of summons upon defendant. None is present from defendants side. Case is put up to 10.10.2025 for service.

Execution application called. None is present from D/H Plaintiff side. Matter is adjourned on. 14.10.2025 for service. R & Ps not sent to the office.

Matter called. Advocate for the D/H is present. Notice returned as per bailiff report. Order passed on it. None is present from defendants side. Case is put up to 14.10.2025 for service.

Case Called.Counsel for the plaintiff is present and filed statement along with Court Fees 15000/-. Order passed thereon. Filed. and also filed statement along with Courier receipt and register post receipts. Process not returned by bailiff. Advocate Mr Imdad Ali Sahito present and filed undertaking on behalf of defendant No.1. Order passed thereon. File. Let the Repeat process upon defendant No.2, 3 and 4 through bailiff. Matter is put of on 16.10.2025.for Service.

Case called. Clerk for the Advocate for the plaintiff is present. Advocate for the defendant No.6(i) & 8(i) is absent. Counsel for the Defendant No.1,3&7 is present and filed affidavit in evidence on behalf of defendant No. 01, 03 and 07. Order passed thereon. Copy to other side. Case is adjourned to 04.10.2025 for evidence/filing affidavit-in-evidence of the defendants No.1,3&7 as last and final chance.

Matter called. Advocate for the Plaintiff is present. Advocate for the Defendant is present. Defendant No.1 is present. In the interest of justice Matter is adjourned to 04.10.2025 for evidence of defendant side.

Case Called. Counsel for the plaintiff is present and filed affidavit in evidence. Counsel for the defendants No 01 is present . Case put off to 11.10.2025 for evidence of the plaintiff side.