S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 |
S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
CIVIL JURISDICTION For Amended Title of Plaint. | |||||||
1 | Ist Class Civil Suits 1115/2017 |
Mst.Bhagli VS Muhammad Alam & Others | Ali Hassan Chandio(ADVO-251-SBC-MKS) | ||||
CIVIL JURISDICTION Other case stage | |||||||
2 | C.Ex. (Civil Executions) 106/2018 |
Aziz Ahmed Ansari VS Hussain Bux and others | Willayat Ali(ADVO-2160-SBC-HYD) | ||||
CIVIL JURISDICTION Order On Application | |||||||
3 | R.C. (Rent Cases) 28/2023 |
Syed Hassan Raza Naqvi VS M/S Bata Pakistan Ltd. | Muhammad Akleem(ADVO-2155-SBC-HYD) | Kashif Faraz Bhutto(ADVO-2979-SBC-HYD),Naeem Hussain (ADVO-6250-SBC-HYD) | Matter called. Applicant is absent. Advocate for applicant is present. Authorized person namely Arif Ahmed Khan on behalf of opponent and his witnesses are absent. Advocate for opponent is absent since last (07) hearings. In the interest of justice matter is adjourned to 23.09.2025, for Evidence of opponent's side....2).Order on Application U/S 19(4) of SRPO 1979. |
||
CIVIL JURISDICTION Compliance | |||||||
4 | Ist Class Civil Suits 1467/2023 |
Muhammad Aslam VS P.O Sindh & others | Muhammad Arshad S. Pathan(ADVO-143-SBC-JMS) | ||||
5 | Ist Class Civil Suits 1706/2023 |
Syed Muhammad Hussain Shah VS Syed Shafquat Hussain Shah and others | Muhammad Hashim Leghari(ADVO-660-SBC-MKS) | ||||
6 | C.Ex. (Civil Executions) 6/2024 |
Riaz Ali & another VS Darhoon Khan through LRs and others | In Person() | ||||
CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
7 | Ist Class Civil Suits 1471/2019 |
Muhammad Akram VS Province of Sindh and others | Farhad Ali(ADVO-1916-SBC-HYD) | ||||
CIVIL JURISDICTION For Further Proceedings | |||||||
8 | C.Ex. (Civil Executions) 63/2022 |
Muhammad Saeed VS Lal Bux @ Shahnawaz | Salahuddin(ADVO-3041-SBC-HYD) | ||||
CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
9 | Ist Class Civil Suits 422/2024 |
Muhammad Shahid VS P.O Sindh & ors | Yawar Abbas(ADVO-2777-SBC-HYD) | ||||
10 | Ist Class Civil Suits 1518/2024 |
Citizen Cooperative Housing Society LTD Hyderabad VS Sohail Ahmed and others | Anis-ur-Rehman(ADVO-1093-SBC-HYD) | Matter called. Attorney of plaintiff is absent. Advocate for plaintiff is present. none appeared on behalf of defendant No.1 to 9 despite Mr. Mukhtiar Ahmed Khoso Advocate bound himself to file power on their behalf. DDA on behalf of defendant No.13 to 16 is present. Mrs.Farhat Khan on behalf of defendant No.12 is absent. Official from Sindh Building Control Authority and filed application at Ex.13 for time to file W/S. Order on it 'Allowed". In the interest of justice matter is adjourned to 10-10-2025 for Service.... 1) Issue summons to defendant No.10,11,17 & 18 by way of registered post AD....2) Filing Written Statement by defendant No.12 to 16 as well as 19 & 20....3) Appearance of defendant No.1 to 9 in pursuance of statement available at Ex.09. |
|||
11 | Ist Class Civil Suits 177/2025 |
Mehnaz through Lrs VS Muhammad Aarib through Lrs and others | Faisal Yousif(ADVO-6425-SBC-HYD) | Matter called. LRs Khamiso on behalf of Plaintiff is absent. Mr. Muhammad Amir Qureshi on behalf of LRs of plaintiff Khamiso is present. Defendant No.1(ii) Allah Bux is present. DDA on behalf of defendant No.8 & 9 is present and filed statement/W.S at Ex.16. Order on it "Copy to otherside". Service upon defendant No.1 (ii to v) to 7 is already declared held good vide order sheet dated 22-08-2025. In the interest of justice matter is adjourned to 10.10.2025. For Appearance of defendant No.1 (i,iii to v) to 7......2) Filling of W/S by private defendant No.1(ii). |
|||
12 | C.Ex. (Civil Executions) 24/2025 |
Muhammad Sarwar Bhatti VS Muhammad Sharif and others | In Person() | ||||
13 | Ist Class Civil Suits 628/2025 |
Mst. Farhana D/o Muhammad Bux VS Mehmood S/o Muhammad Bux & others | Ifranullah Khan(ADVO-2196-SBC-HYD) | ||||
14 | Ist Class Civil Suits 673/2025 |
Soomar VS Province of Sindh and others | Chander Kumar (ADVO-5435-SBC-HYD) | Matter Called. Plaintiff is absent. Adv for plaintiff is present and filed statement coupled with Court fee stamp at Ex.12. Order on it "file". Mr. Anil Kumar Rathor Adv on behalf of Defendant No.5(i(a,b,d) and ii) is present and filed Written Statement at Ex.13. so also filed C/A on application U/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC at Ex.14. Order on them 'Copy to otherside" copy whereof supplied to the plaintiff side. In the interest of justice matter is adjourned to 10-10-2025 for Service upon defendant No.1 to 4 as well as remaining LRs of 5{ i(c,e to i) & iii} through bailiff, registered post AD as well as Courier service. |
|||
15 | Ist Class Civil Suits 1141/2025 |
Mst Zubaida & others VS Province of Sindh and others | Ashar Majeed(ADVO-2788-SBC-HYD) | Matter Called. Plaintiff is absent. Adv for plaintiff is present and filed statement at Ex.08 coupled with Court fee stamp.Order on it" File". Summons through bailiff returned duly pasted at the outer door of the defendant No.13 to 16 in presence of two witnesses as per endorsement of bailiff. Shabir Ahmed Sacretary on behalf of defendant No.2 is present and received copy of plaint. DDA is present and filed Memo of appearance on behalf of defendant No.1 & 3 to 7 at Ex.09. Order on it "File" None appeared on behalf of Defendant No.8 to 12. Statement of bailiff is recorded at Ex.10 who produced relevant annextures at Ex.10/A to Ex.10/C..In the interest of justice matter is adjourned to 04-10-2025. For Service upon defendant No.13 to 16 by way of publication in notified newspaper.... 2) Filing W/S by defendant No. 1 to 7 & 12 while appearance of defendant No.8 to 11 as per statement of defendant No.12 to file W/S. |
|||
16 | Ist Class Civil Suits 1219/2025 |
Jawaid Akhter VS Director Sindh Small Industries Corporation & others | Barrister Muhammad Azmatullah Channa(ADVO-3104-SBC-HYD) | ||||
CIVIL JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
17 | Ist Class Civil Suits 267/2023 |
Umar Khan VS Federation of Pakistan & Orsq | Seema (ADVO-4390-SBC-HYD) | Matter Called. Plaintiff is absent. Counsel for the plaintiff is present. Representative for defendant No.1 to 3 (NADRA) is present. Service upon defendant No.4 is already declared held good vide order sheet 31-07-2025 but none appeared hence defendant No.4 is hereby debarred from filing W/S. Order whereof passed on Order Sheet. In the interest of justice matter is adjourned to 24.09.2025. for Compliance of Section 89/A R/W Order 10 Rule 1(A) CPC. |
|||
18 | Ist Class Civil Suits 755/2024 |
Muhammad Imran Khan VS Qamar Afzal & others | Khurrum Iqbal(ADVO-5620-SBC-HYD) | Matter called. Plaintiff is absent. Adv for plaintiff is present. Attorney Umair Afzal for defendant no.1 is absent. Mr. Syed Zulfiqar Ali Shah Advocate on behalf of 1(d to i) and defendant No.3 is present. Advocate on behalf of defendant No.2 is absent. Perusal of R & Ps shows that Plaintiff side failed to file objections on application U/O 7 Rule 11 CPC since last (10) hearings. None is present on behalf of defendant No. 4 & 5. Adv for plaintiff filed statement at Ex.24 that matter be referenced as pecuniary jurisdiction of civil judges have been increased Up-To 15 Millions. Order on it 'Kept on record".. In the interest of justice matter is adjourned to 10.10.2025 for 1) filling of W.S. defendant No. 4 & 5 despite being served. 2) Issue summons against the defendant No. 1(a) to 1(c) through bailiff by way of pasting in presence of two witnesses. 3) Hearing on application U/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC 4).Filling of C/A on application U/O 7 Rule 11 CPC as last and final chance in case of failure plaintiff side will be debarred form fling C/A and no further opportunity will be given...5) Since pecuniary jurisdiction of civil judges have been increased Up-To 15 Millions. let reference be made for transfer of this suit to the concerned Court of Learned Civil Judge Hyderabad. |
|||
19 | Ist Class Civil Suits 985/2024 |
Muhammad Nasir VS Province of Sindh & others | Irshad Ali(ADVO-2737-SBC-HYD) | ||||
20 | R.C. (Rent Cases) 121/2024 |
Mst, Nayar Sultana & Ors VS Muzafar Hussain | Fazeel Hyder(ADVO-4909-SBC-HYD) | DDA(DDA-0004-GOV-SUK) | |||
21 | C.Ex. (Civil Executions) 107/2024 |
Muhammad Anwar VS Raees | Mohammad Saleem Pathan(ADVO-1670-SBC-HYD) | ||||
22 | Ist Class Civil Suits 313/2025 |
Shah Muhammad Shah VS Province of Sindh and others | Muhammad Afzal(ADVO-4304-SBC-HYD) | ||||
CIVIL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
23 | Ist Class Civil Suits 692/2021 |
Juma VS Province of Sindh & others | Muhammad Ilyas Sikandri(ADVO-1938-SBC-HYD) | DDA(ADVO-007-SBC-NIL) | Matter called. Plaintiff No.1(c) Aslam who is Attorney of remaining plaintiffs is present. Defendant No.5(a) is present. DW-Khushi Muhammad, Haji Khalil and Fahim are present. Advocate for L.Rs of defendants No.5 is present. DDA is present for official defendants No.1 to 4. DW-Mst. Waheedan and DW.Fahimuddin are cross examined to Mr.Muhammad Ilyas Ansair Adv for plaintiff. In the interest of justice matter is adjourned 30-09-2025 for Evidence of Defendant Side (Cross of DW-Haji Khalil and Khusi Muhammad).......2) Hearing on application of contempt of Court U/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC filed by the plaintiff side...3) office is directed to issue summons to official witness District House Officer, Satellite Town Shah latifabad HMC Hyderabad on pointation of defendant side |
||
24 | R.C. (Rent Cases) 151/2024 |
Aleem Ahmed VS Zia-ur-Rehman & others | Manzoor Hussain Shah(ADVO-2913-SBC-HYD) | Ahmed Murtaza(ADVO-4913-SBC-HYD) | Rent Application called. Applicant is present. AW-Haji J.Muhammad is present . Advocate for applicant is present. Opponent is called absent. Mr. Ahmed Murtaza A. Arbab Advocate for opponent No.1 is present. PW-Haji J.Muhammad is cross examined to Adv for opponent. Perusal of R & Ps shows that Opponents were debarred filing of written objection and declared Ex-Parte. However in pursuance of Order dated 14-02-2025 Opponent is at liberty to conduct cross-examination of applicant and his witnesses even when the Ex-Parte Evidence is led. Let matter be fixed for Final Arguments. In the interest of justice matter is adjourned to 30.09.2025 For final arguments. |
||
CIVIL JURISDICTION For Hearing of Applications | |||||||
25 | R.C. (Rent Cases) 208/2011 |
Maqbool Ahmed VS Muharram Ali | Abdul Nasir(ADVO-4339-SBC-HYD) | ||||
26 | Ist Class Civil Suits 273/2025 |
Wali Muhammad and others VS Province of Sindh and others | Ahmed Ali(ADVO-90-SBC-TMK) | Matter Called. Plaintiff No.1 is present. Adv for plaintiff is present. DDA on behalf of defendant No.1 to 6 is present and filed report on behalf of Mukhtiarkar Taluka Hyderabad at Ex.31 along with statement at Ex.32 that he is adopting the report as W/S on behalf of Defendant No.1 to 6. Order on it 'File". Defendant No.8(ii) is absent. Mr.Sattar Iqbal Panhwar on behalf of Defendant No.8 (ii) is absent. Defendant No.9(i) is absent. Partner to Mr.Ahsan Iqbal Memon Adv on behalf of Defendant No.9(i) is present. Defendant No.7,8(i),9(ii) to 11 are already debarred from filing W.S and declared Ex-Parte vide order sheet dated 29-07-2025. In the interest of justice matter is adjourned to 03-10-2025 For 1). Compliance of Section 89/A R/W Order 10 Rule 1(A) CPC....2).Filing C/A on application U/O 11 Rule 12 CPC filed by the plaintiff......3) Hearing on application U/O 7 Rule 11 CPC filed by defendant No.8(ii) while adopted by counsel for defendant No.9(i). |
|||
CIVIL JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
27 | Ist Class Civil Suits 694/2024 |
Ali Akbar Lakho VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors | IN PERSON (SELF)(ADVO-001-SBC-MKS) | Liaquat Ali(ADVO-2460-SBC-HYD) | Matter called. Plaintiff being Advocate himself is present and advanced his final arguments. Advocate for defendants (HESCO) is absent, however, Defendants are already debarred from filing of written statement and objection on application U/O 39 rule 1 and 2 CPC and declared Ex-Parte vide order dated 04-02-2025. In the interest of justice matter is adjourned to 30.09.2025, For pronouncement of Judgement... 2) Hearing on Application U/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC. |