S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 |
S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Report | |||||||
1 | Illegal Dispos. Act (Illegal Dispossesion Act) 43/2025 | Piyaro Lashari VS SHO PS Hussainabad and Ors | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3/4 illegal Dispossession Act | / |
Cr. I.D complaint called. Complainant is absent along with his Counsel Mr. Sajjad Ali Gopang Advocate. I.D Complaint is fixed for submission of reports. Reports from SHO Hussainabad, Mukhtiarkar Gothabad, as well as AC Latifabad not yet received. SHO P.S Hussainabad through Process Server has submitted an application . Order on it. Time granted. Put up to 03.10.2025, for submission of reports/further orders. Call reports from SHO Hussainabad, Mukhtiarkar Gothabad, as well as AC Latifabad as already ordered. |
|
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
2 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 2862/2025 | Zohaib VS The State | Cr.PC-497 | 116/2025 City(Hyd) |
Cr. Bail Application U/S: 497 Cr.P.C called. Counsel to applicant/accused is present. Learned ADPP for the State is present. Arguments heard. Put up to 20.09.2025, for further hearing on bail application, as well as orders. |
||
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Hearing | |||||||
3 | Illegal Dispos. Act (Illegal Dispossesion Act) 48/2025 | Nazar Muhammad VS Juma and Others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3/4 illegal Dispossession Act | / |
Cr. I.D Complaint called. Complainant is present along with his Counsel Mr. Ayazuddin Samoo Advocate. Matter is fixed for hearing on I.D complaint/appearance of Mukhtiarkar. Report already received from P.S. Hatri, Hyderabad & kept on record. Report from Mukhtiarkar Sindh Gothabad Scheme, Hyderabad is also kept on record. Mukhtiarkar Sindh Gothabad Scheme is absent. However Khalil Ahmed (Senior Clerk) Sindh Gothabad Scheme District Hyderabad has appeared and submitted an application for grant of time. Put up to 30.09.2025, for hearing on I.D complaint/appearance of Mukhtiarkar. |
|
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 491 | |||||||
4 | Application u/s 491 CrPc 611/2025 | Mst. Hajran VS SHO PS Baldia and Ors | Shanker Lal (ADVO-99-SBC-THP) | Cr.PC-491 | / |
Cr. Misc. Application U/S: 491 Cr.P.C called. Applicant is present along with her Counsel. SHO P.S Baldia through ASI Yousuf has submitted an application. Order on it. Four days time granted. Put up to 23.09.2025, for recovery of alleged detainee, hearing on misc. application. |
|
5 | Application u/s 491 CrPc 610/2025 | Mst. Sana VS SHO PS Hali Road and Ors | Mir Muhammad (ADVO-5458-SBC-HYD) | Cr.PC-491 | / |
Cr. Misc. Application U/S: 491 Cr.P.C. Applicant is present along with her Counsel. SHO concerned has produced detainees & submit report. Mr. Nadeem Shaikh Advocate has filed vakalatnama on behalf of respondent. Order on it. File. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet. Misc. application stands disposed of accordingly. Cr. Clerk is directed to consign the R & Ps in record room. |
|
6 | Application u/s 491 CrPc 613/2025 | Muhammad Imran Khan VS SHO PS A-Section and Ors | Arshad Ali(ADVO-5005-SBC-HYD) | Cr.PC-491 | / |
Cr. Misc. Application U/S: 491 Cr.P.C called. Applicant is present along with his Counsel. SHO concerned has produced detainee & submit report. Order on it. File. Mr. Arshad Ali Keerio Advocate has filed vakalatnama on behalf of Alveena. Order on it. File. Advocate to applicant has submitted a statement; praying therein for withdrawal of vakalatnama. Order on it. File. Arguments heard. Order announced in open Court and passed on separate sheet. Misc. application stands dismissed and disposed of accordingly. Cr. Clerk is directed to consign the R & Ps in record room. |
|
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
7 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 5170/2025 | Hakim Palari VS SHO of PS: Qasimabad & ors | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Cr.PC-22-A | / |
Cr. Misc. Application called. Applicant is present along with his Counsel. Reports already received from concerned quarters & kept on record. Advocate to applicant has submitted a statement. Arguments heard. Put up to 20.09.2025, for orders on misc. application. |
|
8 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 5310/2025 | Mst. Shahida Parveen VS SHO of PS: Bhitai Nagar & ors | Talal Ahmed(ADVO-5529-SBC-HYD) | Cr.PC-22-A | / |
Cr. Misc. application U/S: 22-A & B Cr.P.C called. Applicant is present along with her Counsel Mr. Sattar Bux Soomro Advocate. Reports already received from concerned quarters & kept on record. Counsel to applicant has submitted a statement along with copy of Registration Card of vehicle viz: Suzuki Cultus Car bearing Registration No. BTA-058. Order on it. Arguments heard. Put up to 20.09.2025, for orders on misc. application. |
|
9 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 5288/2025 | Shoukat Ali VS SHO of PS: Pinyari & ors | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Cr.PC-22-A | / |
Cr. Misc. application U/S: 22-A & B Cr.P.C called. Applicant is absent along with his Counsel Mr. Mueed Shaikh Advocate. Reports already received from concerned quarters & kept on record. Put up to 20.09.2025, for hearing on misc. application, as last & final chance. |
|
10 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 5315/2025 | Sohail Ahmed Qureshi VS SHO PS Qasimabad and Ors | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI) | Cr.PC-22-A | / |
Cr. Misc. Application U/S: 22-A & B Cr.P.C called. Applicant in person is present. Reports already received from concerned quarters & kept on record. Applicant has submitted a statement; praying therein for withdrawal/not pressed instant application. Order on it. File. Order announced in open Court and passed on separate sheet. Misc. application stands disposed of accordingly. Cr. Clerk is directed to consign the R & Ps in record room. |
|
11 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 5364/2025 | Ishraq VS SHO PS Baldia and Ors | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Cr.PC-22-A | / |
Cr. Misc. Application called. Applicant namely Ishraq is present along with his Counsel Mr. Faisal Nadeem Abro. Reports already received from concerned quarters & kept on record. Counsel to applicant has submitted a statement along with Case Law. Order on it. Arguments heard. Put up to 20.09.2025, for orders on misc. application. |
|
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Direct Complaints | |||||||
12 | DC (Direct Complaint) 41/2025 | Election Commission of Pakistan VS Shazia Memon | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Cr.PC-Section 200 ( Direct and Private Complaint) | / |
Direct complaint called. Learned counsel for ECP Mr. Sarmad Sarwar Advocate is present and states that the accused has submitted Form-C along with condonation application which has been accepted by competent authority. However, he seeks time to obtain necessary directions from the competent authority either to proceed the complaint or to withdraw the same because the purpose of Election Commission has been served by submitting Form-C by accused. Accused is called absent along with her Counsel Syed Aeraz Ali Shah Advocate, while Junior is present and submitted an application for condonation. Order on it. Put up to 26.09.2025, for hearing. Issue notice to accused to be served through SHO concerned. |
|
13 | DC (Direct Complaint) 44/2025 | Election Commission of Pakistan VS Sheeraz | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Cr.PC-Section 200 ( Direct and Private Complaint) | / |
Direct complaint called. Learned counsel for ECP Mr. Sarmad Sarwar Advocate is present and states that the accused has submitted Form-C along with condonation application which has been accepted by competent authority. However, he seeks time to obtain necessary directions from the competent authority either to proceed the complaint or to withdraw the same because the purpose of Election Commission has been served by submitting Form-C by accused. Since the accused is called absent, therefore, issue bailable warrants of arrest of accused in the sum of Rs.50,000/-. Put up to 26.09.2025, for hearing. Issue BW against absent accused to be served through SHO concerned. |
|
14 | DC (Direct Complaint) 30/2025 | Election Commission of Pakistan VS Babar Jalal | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Cr.PC-Section 200 ( Direct and Private Complaint) | / |
Direct complaint called. Learned counsel for ECP Mr. Sarmad Sarwar Advocate is present and states that the accused has submitted Form-C along with condonation application which has been accepted by competent authority. However, he seeks time to obtain necessary directions from the competent authority either to proceed the complaint or to withdraw the same because the purpose of Election Commission has been served by submitting Form-C by accused. Accused is present along with his Counsel Mr. Faisal Mughal Advocate. Put up to 26.09.2025, for hearing. |
|
15 | DC (Direct Complaint) 31/2025 | Election Commission of Pakistan VS Mir Yasir Talpur | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Cr.PC-Section 200 ( Direct and Private Complaint) | / |
Direct complaint called. Learned counsel for ECP Mr. Sarmad Sarwar Advocate is present and states that the accused has submitted Form-C along with condonation application which has been accepted by competent authority. However, he seeks time to obtain necessary directions from the competent authority either to proceed the complaint or to withdraw the same because the purpose of Election Commission has been served by submitting Form-C by accused. Since the accused is called absent along with his Counsel Mr. Barkat Ali Panhwar Advocate, therefore, issue bailable warrants of arrest of accused in the sum of Rs.50,000/-. Put up to 26.09.2025, for hearing. Issue BW against absent accused to be served through SHO concerned. |
|
16 | DC (Direct Complaint) 40/2025 | Election Commission of Pakistan VS Zahid Ur Rehman | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Cr.PC-Section 200 ( Direct and Private Complaint) | / |
Direct complaint called. Learned counsel for ECP Mr. Sarmad Sarwar Advocate is present and states that the accused has submitted Form-C along with condonation application which has been accepted by competent authority. However, he seeks time to obtain necessary directions from the competent authority either to proceed the complaint or to withdraw the same because the purpose of Election Commission has been served by submitting Form-C by accused. Since the accused is called absent along with his Counsel Mr. Naeem Ahmed Junejo Advocate, therefore, issue bailable warrants of arrest of accused in the sum of Rs.50,000/-. Put up to 26.09.2025, for hearing. Issue BW against absent accused to be served through SHO concerned. |
|
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
17 | DC (Direct Complaint) 28/2025 | Election Commission of Pakistan VS Shusheel Gobind | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Cr.PC-Section 200 ( Direct and Private Complaint) | / |
Direct Complaint called, which is fixed today for service. Mr. Sarmad Sarwar Advocate to complainant is present. BWs not issued. Put up to 26.09.2025, for service. Office is directed to issue BW against respondent/accused to be served through SHO P.S Sakhi Pir, Hyderabad. |
|
18 | DC (Direct Complaint) 47/2025 | Election Commission of Pakistan VS Naveedullah Khan | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Cr.PC-Section 200 ( Direct and Private Complaint) | / |
Direct Complaint called. Mr. Sarmad Sarwar Advocate to complainant is present. None is present from respondent side. Process not issued. Let the BW be issued against accused in sum of Rs. 50,000/-. Put up to 26.09.2025, for service. Issue BW against accused to be served through SHO P.S A & B Sections. |
|
19 | DC (Direct Complaint) 48/2025 | Election Commission of Pakistan VS Taimoor Hussain | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Cr.PC-Section 200 ( Direct and Private Complaint) | / |
Direct Complaint called. Mr. Sarmad Sarwar Advocate to complainant is present. None is present. Process not issued. Let the BW be issued against accused in sum of Rs. 50,000/-. Put up to 26.09.2025, for service. Issue BW against respondent/accused to be served through SHO P.S Airport District Nawabshah. |
|
20 | DC (Direct Complaint) 33/2025 | Election Commission of Pakistan VS Hussain Rashid | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Cr.PC-Section 200 ( Direct and Private Complaint) | / |
Direct complaint called. Learned counsel for ECP Mr. Sarmad Sarwar Advocate is present and states that the accused has submitted Form-C along with condonation application which has been accepted by competent authority. However, he seeks time to obtain necessary directions from the competent authority either to proceed the complaint or to withdraw the same because the purpose of Election Commission has been served by submitting Form-C by accused. Since the accused is called absent, therefore, issue bailable warrants of arrest of accused in the sum of Rs.50,000/-. Put up to 26.09.2025, for service. Issue BW against accused to be served through SHO P.S Hali Road, Hyderabad. |
|
21 | DC (Direct Complaint) 49/2025 | Election Commission of Pakistan VS Hakeem Khan | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Cr.PC-Section 200 ( Direct and Private Complaint) | / |
Direct complaint called. Learned counsel for ECP Mr. Sarmad Sarwar Advocate is present and states that the accused has submitted Form-C along with condonation application which has been accepted by competent authority. However, he seeks time to obtain necessary directions from the competent authority either to proceed the complaint or to withdraw the same because the purpose of Election Commission has been served by submitting Form-C by accused. Since the accused is called absent, therefore, issue bailable warrants of arrest of accused in the sum of Rs.50,000/-. Put up to 26.09.2025, for service. Issue BW against accused to be served through SHO P.S Hali Road, Hyderabad. |
|
22 | DC (Direct Complaint) 32/2025 | Election Commission of Pakistan VS Faheem | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Cr.PC-Section 200 ( Direct and Private Complaint) | / |
Direct complaint called. Learned counsel for ECP Mr. Sarmad Sarwar Advocate is present and states that the accused has submitted Form-C along with condonation application which has been accepted by competent authority. However, he seeks time to obtain necessary directions from the competent authority either to proceed the complaint or to withdraw the same because the purpose of Election Commission has been served by submitting Form-C by accused. Since the accused is called absent, therefore, issue bailable warrants of arrest of accused in the sum of Rs.50,000/-. Put up to 26.09.2025, for service. Issue BW against accused to be served through SHO P.S Phuleli, Hyderabad. |
|
23 | DC (Direct Complaint) 46/2025 | Election Commission of Pakistan VS Ahmer Ahmed Shaikh | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Cr.PC-Section 200 ( Direct and Private Complaint) | / |
Direct Complaint called. Mr. Sarmad Sarwar Advocate to complainant is present. Matter is fixed for service. Process not issued. Let the BW be issued against accused in sum of Rs. 50,000/-. Put up to 26.09.2025, for service. Issue BW against accused to be served through SHO P.S City, Hyderabad. |
|
24 | DC (Direct Complaint) 55/2025 | Election Commission of Pakistan VS Anwar Mughal | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Cr.PC-Section 200 ( Direct and Private Complaint) | / |
Direct Complaint called. Mr. Sarmad Sarwar Advocate to complainant is present. Matter is fixed for service. Process not issued. However, Respondent/accused has appeared before the Court along with Counsel. Mr. Faisal Mughal Advocate has filed vakalatnama on behalf of accused. Order on it. File. Put up to 26.09.2025, for hearing/further orders. Accused is directed to attend. |
|
25 | DC (Direct Complaint) 42/2025 | Election Commission of Pakistan VS Ali Haider Memon | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Cr.PC-Section 200 ( Direct and Private Complaint) | / |
Direct complaint called. Learned counsel for ECP Mr. Sarmad Sarwar Advocate is present and states that the accused has submitted Form-C along with condonation application which has been accepted by competent authority. However, he seeks time to obtain necessary directions from the competent authority either to proceed the complaint or to withdraw the same because the purpose of Election Commission has been served by submitting Form-C by accused. Since the accused is called absent, therefore, issue bailable warrants of arrest of accused in the sum of Rs.50,000/-. Put up to 26.09.2025, for service. Issue BW against accused to be served through SHO P.S Bhitai Nagar, Hyderabad. |
|
26 | DC (Direct Complaint) 45/2025 | Election Commission of Pakistan VS Muzamil | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Cr.PC-Section 200 ( Direct and Private Complaint) | / |
Direct Complaint called, which is fixed today for service. Mr. Sarmad Sarwar Advocate to complainant is present. None is present from other-side. Process not issued. Repeat N.B.W against respondent. Put up to 26.09.2025, for service. Issue N.B.W to respondent/accused to be served through SHO P.S Pinyari, Hyderabad. |
|
27 | DC (Direct Complaint) 29/2025 | Election Commission of Pakistan VS Mst. Zeenat Samoo | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Cr.PC-Section 200 ( Direct and Private Complaint) | / |
Direct complaint called. Learned counsel for ECP Mr. Sarmad Sarwar Advocate is present and states that the accused has submitted Form-C along with condonation application which has been accepted by competent authority. However, he seeks time to obtain necessary directions from the competent authority either to proceed the complaint or to withdraw the same because the purpose of Election Commission has been served by submitting Form-C by accused. Since the accused is called absent, therefore, issue bailable warrants of arrest of accused in the sum of Rs.50,000/-. Put up to 26.09.2025, for service. Issue BW against accused to be served through SHO P.S Bhitai Nagar, Hyderabad. |
|
28 | DC (Direct Complaint) 50/2025 | Election Commission of Pakistan VS Sheeraz Ahmed | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Cr.PC-Section 200 ( Direct and Private Complaint) | / |
Direct Complaint called. Mr. Sarmad Sarwar Advocate to complainant is present. None is present. Process not issued. Let the BW be issued against accused in sum of Rs. 50,000/-. Put up to 26.09.2025, for service. Repeat BW against respondent/accused to be served through SHO P.S Tando Jam, Hyderabad. |
|
29 | DC (Direct Complaint) 43/2025 | Election Commission of Pakistan VS Anjum Shahzad | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Cr.PC-Section 200 ( Direct and Private Complaint) | / |
Direct Complaint called. Mr. Sarmad Sarwar Advocate to complainant is present. Matter is fixed for service. Notice has been issued but same is returned un-served as per endorsement of Process Server P.S Fort, Hyderabad. Let the BW be issued against accused in sum of Rs. 50,000/-. Put up to 26.09.2025, for service. Issue BW against accused to be served through SHO P.S City, Hyderabad, as well as through SHO P.S Fort, Hyderabad. |
|
30 | DC (Direct Complaint) 51/2025 | Election Commission of Pakistan VS Muhammad Bux | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Cr.PC-Section 200 ( Direct and Private Complaint) | / |
Direct Complaint called. Mr. Sarmad Sarwar Advocate to complainant is present. None is present. Process not issued. Put up to 26.09.2025, for service. Issue N.B.W against accused to be served through SHO P.S Qasimabad, Hyderabad. |
S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
1 | S. Ex. (Summary Executions) 49/2024 |
Anwar Ali Soomro VS Mansoor Hayat | Juneed(ADVO-3221-SBC-HYD) | Summary Execution Application called. Plaintiff/D.H is absent along with his Counsel Mr. Junaid Soomro Advocate. Defendant/J.D is yet to be served. Notices not issued as costs not paid. In the interest of justice; matter is adjourned and put up to 11.10.2025, for service. Issue notice to the Defendant/J.D to be served through bailiff of Honorable District Court Matiari, TCS, Register Post/A.D. |
|||
CIVIL JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
2 | Summary Suits 115/2025 |
Mst. Sanober Iqbal Shaikh w/o Israr Khanzada VS Sumed Shaikh s/o Qamar Zaman Shaikh | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Summary Suit called. Plaintiff is absent while her Counsel Mr. Sameeullah Rind Advocate is present. Defendant is absent while his Counsel is present and submitted and application U/S: 148 CPC Ex: 10. Order on it. Time granted. One Khalid Ghafoor S/o Abdul Ghafoor has appeared before the Court to stands as surety for defendant and submitted affidavit, coupled with bio-metric affidavit in support of surety and surety documents viz: Registration Card of Toyota/Vitz Car bearing Registration No. BLN-116. Order passed on affidavit. Call verification. By consent; matter is adjourned and put up to 04.10.2025, for filing written statement/verification of surety documents. Office is directed to call verification report of surety documents from ETO/MRA Civic Centre Karachi. |
|||
CIVIL JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
3 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 80/2025 |
Mst. Shahida Parveen w/o late Nazeer Hussain VS P.O Sindh & ors - F.C Suit No.568/2023 | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Civil Appeal called. Appellant is present along with her Counsel Mr. Faisal Nadeem Abro Advocate. Counsel to respondent No. 4 is present. DDA is present. None else is in attendance. Counsel to appellant has submitted a statement along with Leopard's Courier receipt at Ex: 15. Oder on it. File. Order passed on separate Order Sheet. Put up to 07.10.2025, for appearance of respondents, as well as hearing/arguments. Office is directed to call detail report from District Account Officer Jamshoro in respect of pension of deceased Nazeer Hussain Channa S/o Ghulam Nabi Channa ETO No. 10459159-01 pensioner I.D 10459159, as well as directed to submit pension rules. |
|||
CIVIL JURISDICTION For Orders | |||||||
4 | Summary Suits 21/2025 |
Abdul Ghafoor s/o Muhammad Nazir VS Awais Khan s/o Abdul Qadeer | Muhammad Naveed(ADVO-3473-SBC-HYD) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Summary Suit called, which is fixed today for orders. Plaintiff is absent while his Counsel Mr. Naveed Shaikh Advocate is present. Defendant is absent while his Counsel is present. Arguments already heard. For want of time; matter is adjourned and put up to 03.10.2025, for orders. |
S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
FAMILY JURISDICTION For Further Proceedings | |||||||
1 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 93/2024 | Mst. Shabana Wd/o Khalid Pervaiz VS CEO HESCO Hyd & ors - Deceased Khalid Pervaiz S/o Inayatulah | Syed Gohar Ali(ADVO-4179-SBC-HYD),Zulfiqar Ali(ADVO-18378-SBC-KHS) | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-372 | Succession Application called. Applicant is present along with her Counsel. Mr. Arshad Pathan Advocate on behalf of the HESCO is absent, while Associate Partner is present. Intervenor Muhammad Jibran is present along with his Counsel Mr. Liaquat Ali Bhand Advocate. Mr. Tanveer Daudani Advocate on behalf of intervenor Minha is present. Respondents No. 3 namely Maheen Tabish is absent while her Counsel Mr. Fayaz Ahmed Laghari Advocate is present. None is present from remaining respondents. Heard. Order passed on separate Order Sheet. The respondents No. 6,7,8 & 9 though the service has been affected through all modes including publication. Hence, respondents No. 6,7,8 & 9 are debarred, whereas the remaining respondents have filed their objection/counter affidavit. Put up to 06.10.2025, for further proceedings. Parties are directed to attend. |