S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 |
S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 2835/2025 | Gehna Khan and Another VS The State | DDPP(ADVO-002-SBC-LRK) | Cr.PC-497 | 183/2025 Hussainabad |
The B.A called. The advocate for applicant/accused is present. DDPP for the state is present. Heard arguments. Order passed and announced in open court. Bail application is allowed. Order passed and announced in open court. Bail granted to applicant/accused in sum of Rs.30,000/- and P.R bond in the like amount. B.A disposed of. |
|
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
2 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 2677/2025 | Faisal @ Baba & others VS The State | DDPP(ADVO-002-SBC-LRK) | Cr.PC-498 | 5/2025 Sakhi Pir |
The B.A called. The applicants are present on interim bail. ADPP is present. Police papers not produced. Put of to 26.9.2025 for arguments. Call police papers. The applicants are directed to attend. |
|
3 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 2748/2025 | Gul Bahar VS The State | DDPP(ADVO-002-SBC-LRK) | Cr.PC-498 | / |
The Cr. M. Application called. The applicant and his advocate are present. Report received from the SHO and SP complaint cell Hyderabad. Order on it. File. Heard arguments. Order passed and announced in open court. The instant cr. misc application stand disposed in term of separate order. |
|
4 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 2754/2025 | Riaz Ahmed VS The State | DDPP(ADVO-002-SBC-LRK) | Cr.PC-498 | / |
The B.A called. The applicants and their advocate called absent. ADPP is present. Police papers not produced. In the interest of justice matter is adjourned to 24.9.2025 for arguments. Call police papers. |
|
5 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 2720/2025 | Imtiaz Ahmed Abro VS The State | DDPP(ADVO-002-SBC-LRK) | Cr.PC-498 | 274/2025 Hatri |
The B.A called. The accused is present on interim bail. The advocate for accused is present. DDPP for the state is present. Heard arguments order passed an announced in open court. Interim bail confirmed. B.A disposed of. |
|
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Hearing | |||||||
6 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 5265/2025 | Nazim Hussain VS SHO PS Hatri and Ors | DDPP(ADVO-002-SBC-LRK) | Cr.PC-22-A | / |
The matter called. The applicant and his advocate called absent. ADPP is present. Proposed accused called absent. In the interest of justice matter is adjourned to 22.9.2025 for appearance of proposed accused. Issue notice to proposed accused. |
|
7 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 5203/2025 | Ghulam Mohiuddin VS SP Trafic Police Hyderabad and Ors | DDPP(ADVO-002-SBC-LRK) | Cr.PC-22-A | / |
The Cr. M. Application called. The applicant and his advocate are present. Report received from the SHO and SP complaint cell Hyderabad. Order on it. File. Heard arguments. Order passed and announced in open court. The instant cr. misc application stand disposed in term of separate order. |
|
8 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 5346/2025 | Mir Fawad Ali VS SHO PS Husri/Pabban and Ors | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI) | Cr.PC-22-A | / |
The matter called. The applicant and his advocate called absent without any intimation. Report of SHO not received. In the interest of justice matter is adjourned to 22.9.2025 for report. Call report from SHO. |
|
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
9 | SC (Murder Trial) 488/2025 | The State VS Baber Turk and Another | DDPP(ADVO-002-SBC-LRK) | PPC-302 | 79/2025 Market (Hyd) |
The case called. The accused Babar is not produced in custody by J/A. The accused Shoukat called absent without any intimation. Learned advocate for accused Babar is present. Advocate for accused Shoukat called absent. ADPP is present. Today application filed by parties for permission to compromise and compromise applications are fixed. The reports not received. Copy of publication in newspaper not produced by parties. Put of to 22.9.2025 for report and hearing compromise application. issue show cause notice to concerned Mukhtiarkar, SHO, Incharge Nadra and UC Chairman for non production of report in respect of LRs of deceased. The notice be got published in news paper on the costs of accused. Call reports alongwith concerned officers for recording their statement. Late Diary: Report received from Mukhtiarkar and City Survey officer Taluka City Hyderabad lately. The matter is already adjourned to 22.9.2025. |
|
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
10 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 5374/2025 | Sajid Ali Bhatti VS SHO PS Market and Ors | DDPP(ADVO-002-SBC-LRK) | Cr.PC-22-A | / |
The Cr. M. Application called. The applicant and his advocate are not present. Order passed and announced in open court. The instant cr. misc application stand disposed in term of separate order. |
|
11 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 5398/2025 | Faiz Ur Rehman VS SHO PS Site and Ors | DDPP(ADVO-002-SBC-LRK) | Cr.PC-22-A | / |
The Cr. M. Application called. The applicant and his advocate are present. Report received from the SHO and SP complaint cell Hyderabad. Order on it. File. Heard arguments. Order passed and announced in open court. The instant cr. misc application stand disposed in term of separate order. |
|
12 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 5415/2025 | Faisal Raja VS SHO PS Pinyari and Ors | Cr.PC-22-A | / |
The Cr. M. Application called. The applicant and his advocate are present. Report received from the SHO and SP complaint cell Hyderabad. Order on it. File. Heard arguments. Order passed and announced in open court. The instant cr. misc application stand disposed in term of separate order. |
||
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Formal Cases | |||||||
13 | DC (Direct Complaint) 64/2025 | Altaf Khaskheli VS Tufail Abro | DDPP(ADVO-002-SBC-LRK) | Cr.PC-Section 200 ( Direct and Private Complaint) | / |
The matter called. Complainant and his advocate called absent. In the interest of justice matter is adjourned to 30.9.2025 for recording statement of complainant. Complainant is directed to attend. |
S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
1 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 66/2025 |
Muhammad Sabir s/o Habib ur Rehman & ors VS P.O Sindh & ors - F.C Suit No.57/2018 | Irfan Ahmed Qureshi(ADVO-1741-SBC-HYD) | The matter called. Parties and their advocate called absent. Objections not filed by respondents. DDA is present and filed statement alongwith report of Mukhtiarkar. In the interest of justice matter is adjourned to 10.10.2025 for filing objection by respondents. |
|||
2 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 90/2025 |
Muhammad Nadeem Qureshi s/o Abdul Waheed Qureshi VS Allah Ditta s/o Wazir Ali Malik & ors - F.C Suit No.215/2025 | Zulfiqar Ali Rajput(ADVO-4691-SBC-HYD) | The matter called. The parties are not present. The advocate for appellant is not present. Cost not paid by appellant. In the interest of justice last chance is provided to appellant for condoning the delay and directed to deposit process fee within 03 days and matter is adjourned to 09.10.2025 for service. Issue process on the cost of appellant. |
|||
3 | S. Ex. (Summary Executions) 47/2025 |
Muhammad Asim VS Abdul Haseeb & others | Anand Kumar Khatri (ADVO-5844-SBC-HYD) | The matter called. The parties are not present. The advocate for D.H is present. The D.H could not deposit process fee. His advocate requested for condone delay. The request allowed subject to deposit of process fee with 03 days and matter is adjourned to 07.10.2025 for service. Issue process against J.D on costs. |
|||
CIVIL JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
4 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 232/2024 |
Mst. Sumera D/o Muhammad Aslam w/o Abdul Qadeer & ors VS Mst. Suriya Yasmeen wd/o Muhammad Aslam & ors - F.C Suit No.754/2020 | Faheem (ADVO-4266-SBC-HYD) | Ghulam Rasool (ADVO-242-SBC-MTY) | The matter called. The parties are not present. The advocate for appellant is present. The advocate for respondent No.1 to 3 is present, who requested for providing copies and stated that he would not file objection and he directly argue in this appeal on behalf of respondent No.12 to 3. Learned advocate for appellant is directed to provide copies to advocate for respondent No.1 to 3. And matter is adjourned to 09.10.2025 for arguments. |
||
CIVIL JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
5 | S. Ex. (Summary Executions) 54/2024 |
Syed Zia ur Rehman VS Muhammad Aijaz Khan (Summary Suit No.67/2017) | Irshad Ahmed(ADVO-2006-SBC-HYD) | The matter called. The parties and their advocate called absent. Matter was fixed for arguments. In the interest of justice matter is adjourned to 10.10.2025 for arguments. |