| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | SCMO 45/2026 | The State VS Khaista Syed and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-MLR) | PPC-285,PPC-286 | 4/2026 Steel Town |
Case called. Accused Khaisata and Maqbool are called absent without intimation. ADPP is present. Issue NBW against the absent accused and notice to surety. Case is put up to 22.04.2026 for formal. Issue NBW against the absent accused and notice to surety. |
|
| 2 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 37/2026 | Bashir VS The State | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | Cr.PC-497 | 282/2026 Steel Town |
Record shows that the bail application is allowed subject to furnish the solvent surety in the sum of Rs 10,000/- in the like amount of PR bond to the satisfactions of the court but inadvertently in diary dated 16.03.2026 bail amount is Rs.20,000/-. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 3 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 36/2026 | Muhammad Ramzan VS The State | Cr.PC-497 | 255/2026 Steel Town |
Bail Application called. Both the respective counsels for the parties are present. ADPP is present. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open court and on separate sheet, hence, bail application is dismissed. |
||
| 4 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 39/2026 | Abdul Ghaffor VS The State | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | Cr.PC-497 | 282/2026 Steel Town |
Criminal Bail application called. Counsel for accused is present. ADPP is present. Arguments from both sides. Order passed and announced in open and on separate sheet hence, bail application is allowed with sum of Rs.20,000/- with P.R bond in like amount to the satisfaction of the court. |
|
| 5 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 40/2026 | Rehmatullah VS The State | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | Cr.PC-497 | 14/2026 PS Railway Landhi |
Bail application called. Counsel for accused is present. ADPP is present. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open court and on separate sheet, hence, bail application is allowed subject to furnish solvent surety in sum of Rs.30,000/- and also with PR. Bond |
|
| 6 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 38/2026 | Aqal Din VS The State | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | Cr.PC-497 (v) | 250/2026 Steel Town |
Bail application called. Counsel for accused is present. Mr. Sher Khan Rahujo advocate is present and filed vakalatnama on behalf of complainant. Order on it. File. Arguments heard from accused side. Matter is adjourned to 18.03.2026 for arguments from complainant as well as ADPP side. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 7 | PPC 350/2023 | The State VS Abid Ali . Zain, Ammar Raja Asif, M Hasnain, Zubair, Shahrukh, Faisal, Abid @ Dental, Fayyaz | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-MLR),Muhammad Sharif(ADVO-14323-SBC-KHS) | Riaz Hussain (ADVO-19946-SBC-MLR) | PPC-34,PPC-380,PPC-454,PPC-457 | 697/2023 Shah Latif Town |
Case called. Accused Zain is called absent without intimation. Accused Abid is produce by the jail authority. Accused Ammar Ashraf is proclaimed offender vide dated 15-4-2025. Accused Raja Asif, Muhammad Hasnain, Zubair, Muhammad Shahruk Chohan, Abid @ Dentar, Faysal, and Muhammad Fayyaz are shown column No.02 with red ink are declared proclaimed offender vide order dated 12-02-2025. ADPP is present. ADPP is present. Defence counsel is present and argued on the bail application of accused Abid Ali. Heard. Order passed and announced in open court and on separate sheet, hence, bail application is granted subject to furnish solvent surety of Rs.1,00,000/- with P.R bond. Case is put up to 27-3-2026 for evidence. Issue BW against the PWs. IO is directed to appear along case property, Issue BW against the absent accused and notice to the surety. |
| 8 | PPC 361/2023 | The State VS Muhammad Husnain Mughal , Ali & Sher(Proclaimed offender) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-MLR) | Muhammad Anees(ADVO-18894-SBC-KHS) | PPC-34,PPC-380,PPC-457 | 820/2023 Shah Latif Town |
Case called. Accused Muhammad Hasnain is present on bail and filed an application for condonation. Order on it. condone. Accused Ali and Shoaib are declared proclaimed offender. ADPP is present. Case is put up to 15.04.2026 for evidence. Issue show cause notice to Court Mohrar for non submitting the report of verification of PWs Ghulam Ali from the IO whether he is alive or dead through IO ASI Allah Bux Narejo. |
| 9 | Juv. Child Act (JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM ORDINANCE) 17/2024 | MUHAMMAD AHMED VS ARMAN | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-MLR) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | PPC-381-A | 407/2024 Sohrab Goth |
Case Called. Accused Arman is produce by the jail custody. ADPP is present. IO is present and examined at Exh.09. ADPP filed statement for side closed which is placed on record at Exh....10. Statement under section 342 Cr.P.C recorded at Exh..... 11. Arguments heard from both sides. Judgment passed and announced in open court and on separate sheet hence, accused Arman is acquitted under section 245 (i) Cr.P.C. He is produced by the jail authority. Office is directed to issue release writ with direction to the Jail superintendent to release the accused if he is no more required in any other custody cases/crime. |
| 10 | SCMO 89/2025 | Atif Hussain VS Jahangir | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | PPC-379 | 430/2025 Steel Town |
Case called. Accused Jahangir is called absent with out intimation. Process returned. Order passed on it. Notice to surety. ADPP is present. Put up to 22-04-2026 for evidence. Issue Summons to the PWs. Issue NBW against the absent accused and notice to the surety. |
|
| 11 | PPC 91/2025 | Zia ur Rehman VS Jon Masih | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | PPC-380,PPC-381,PPC-454,PPC-457 | 581/2025 Steel Town |
Case called. Accused Christor @ Shahruk is produce by the jail custody. Accused John Masih is mentioned in column no 02 with blue ink. ADPP is present No PWs is present. Process returned. Order passed on it. None is present Let the NBW of complainant be issued through I.O. put to 27.03.2026 for evidence. Issue NBW of complainant through I.O and BWs to PWs |
|
| 12 | SCMO 148/2025 | ASI Nazeer Ahmed VS Muhammad Imran | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | PPC-279 | 807/2025 Steel Town |
Case Called. Accused Muhammad Imran is present on bail. ADPP is present. Defence counsel is present. PWs ASI Nazeer Ahmed at Exh.... 03, PC Muhammad Yahah at Exh. ...04 and PW/I.O ASI Muhammad Qadeer is present and examined at Exh....05. ADPP filed statement for side closed which is placed on record at Exh....06. Statement under section 342 Cr.P.C recorded at Exh..... 07. Arguments heard from both sides. Judgment passed and announced in open court and on separate sheet hence, accused is acquitted under section 245 (i) Cr.P.C. He is present on bail his bail bond stands cancelled and surety is discharged. |
|
| 13 | PPC 105/2025 | Meer khan VS Muhammad Kashif | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | PPC-34,PPC-380,PPC-454 | 637/2025 Steel Town |
Case called, Accused Muhammad Kashif is not produce by the jail custody. ADPP is present. case is put upto 27.03.202. for evidence. Issue NBW against the remaining Pws. Issue show cause notice to Jail Superintendent for non production of accused. |
|
| 14 | PPC 146/2025 | Sohail Sajjad VS Abdul Rahim | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | PPC-380,PPC-454,PPC-511 | 836/2025 Steel Town |
Case called. Accused Abdul Raheem is produced by the Jail authority. ADPP is present. No PWs is Present. Put up to 24.03.2026 for evidence. Issue Summons to the PWs. |
|
| 15 | Hd.T. (Hudood Trial) 12/2026 | The State VS Parbho | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-MLR) | Muhammad Zeeshan (ADVO-50095-SBC-MLR) | Hudood Ordinances-3/4 PEHO | 876/2025 Steel Town |
Case Called. Accused Parbo is called absent his counsel is present and filed an application for condoantion. Order on it. Condone. ADPP is present. Put upto 07.04.2026 for evidence. Issue Summons to the PWs. |
| 16 | Hd.T. (Hudood Trial) 26/2026 | The State VS Parbho | Muhammad Zeeshan (ADVO-50095-SBC-MLR) | Hudood Ordinances-3/4 PEHO | 121/2026 Steel Town |
Case Called. Accused Parbo is called absent his counsel is present and filed an application for condoantion. Order on it. Condone. ADPP is present. Put upto 07.04.2026 for evidence. Issue Summons to the PWs. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Supply of Copies | |||||||
| 17 | Juv. Child Act (JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM ORDINANCE) 10/2025 | Talib Hussain VS Ayaz | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 137/2025 Memon Goth |
PO is on training. Crl Case Called. Accused Ayaz is called absent without intimation. ADPP is present. Put up to 24-03-2026 for copy supply. Issue NBW against the absent accused and notice to the surety. |
|
| 18 | Juv. Child Act (JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM ORDINANCE) 11/2025 | ASI Haji Khan VS Amjad Ali | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | Hudood Ordinances-3-4 | 121/2025 Memon Goth |
Case called. Accused Amjad Ali is called absent. ADPP is present. Put up to 24.03.2026 for copy supply. Issue NBW against the absent accused and notice to the surety. |
|
| 19 | PPC 155/2025 | Mubashir Rehan VS 1) Ishtiaq 2) Ashfaq 3) Hamad Shah | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-MLR) | PPC-420,PPC-506-B | 796/2025 Steel Town |
Case called. Accused Ishtihaque Hussain, Ashfaque Ahmed and Hammad Shah are called absent. ADPP is present. Complainant is called absent. Case is put up to 15.04.2026 for supply of copies. Issue NBW against the absent accused and notice to the surety. Call surety particulars through Reader. |
|
| 20 | PPC 11/2026 | The State VS Sarfaraz Ahmed | Muhammad Zeeshan (ADVO-50095-SBC-MLR) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 875/2025 Steel Town |
Case Called. Accused Parbo is called absent his counsel is present and filed an application for condonation. Order on it. Condone. Accused Sarfaraz is not produce by the jail custody. ADPP is present. Put upto 07.04.2026 for copy supply. Issue PO for the accused Sarfaraz and show cause notice to the jail superintendent. |
|
| 21 | PPC 4/2026 | The State VS Javed & Ors | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 945/2025 Steel Town |
Case called. Accused Javed son of Muhammad Katchi is present on bail along with counsel. Accused Javed son of Haibat Khan is produce by the jail custody. Copy supplied to the accused persons which is placed on record at Exh..........01. ADPP is present. put up to 27.03.2026 for charge. Accused is directed to attend the court. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Formal Cases | |||||||
| 22 | PPC 214/2023 | TAHIR SULEMAN VS MUHAMMAD AKHTAR & OTHERS | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | PPC-406,PPC-407,PPC-408 | 585/2023 Shah Latif Town |
Case called. Accused Muhammad Akhter is proclaimed offender. Accused Muhammad Afzal and accused Muhammad Bilal are acquitted under section 249-A Cr.P.C . As per record and order dated 22-05-2023 passed on remand report U/s 167 Cr.P.C Accused Dilbar is discharged U/s 63 Cr.P.C. Accused Muhammad Sajjad and Muhammad Aleem are declared proclaimed offender. ADPP and focal persons are present. Case is put up to 15.04.2026 for formal. Issue NBW to the accused Dilbar through Surety Muhammad Khalid son of Abdullah R/o Bin Qasim Muhalla Muslim league colony 2 Karachi having Cell No 0315-8873382. |
|
| 23 | SCMO 102/2025 | Ashiq Hussain VS Ibad Ahmed | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | PPC-489-F | 352/2025 Steel Town |
Case Called. Accused Ebad Ahmed is proclaimed offender ADPP is present. Issue letter to SSP for initiating the proceedings against the accused person in view of PLD 2016 page no. 238. Case is put up to 05.05.2026 for progress report |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | F.S. (Family Suits) 371/2025 | Mst Sheena Ali VS Shaman Ali | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Family suit called. Plaintiff is absent his counsel is also absent. None is appeared from the defendant side. Put up to 30-3-2026 for service through Whatsaap via bailiff, TCS/AD as last chance if fail to do any appropriate order will be passed. |
||
| 2 | F.S. (Family Suits) 374/2025 | Khadeeja tul Kubra VS Nazeer Ahmed | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Family suit called. counsel for the Plaintiff is absent. Defendant is also absent. put up to 30.03.2026 for service. Let the PO be issued for the Defendant. Office is directed to trace out the file. |
||
| 3 | F.S. (Family Suits) 9/2026 | Mst. Fatima Qamar VS Arbaz Khan | Imran Ali(ADVO-17369-SBC-KHS) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Family suit called. None is present from either side. Put up to 09-04-2026 for service through DJ and Whatsapp via bailiff as last chance. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 4 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 150/2025 | Mst. Rehana Bibi VS Muhammad Amjad and others | Mumtaz Hussain(ADVO-7691-SBC-KHS) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-Application U/S 7 & 10 of Guardian & Ward Act | G&W called. Counsel for the applicant is present.Counsel for the respondent is present and submit objection as well as application for rejection of memo of petition. Order passed on it. Copy to other side and same is received by the applicant counsel. Counsel for respondent also filed application for direction to conduct followup medical test and application for production of bank statement. Order passed on it. Advocate to be heard. Put up to 07-04-2026 for C/A on application application for rejection of memo of petition and hearing on application for direction to conduct followup medical test and application for production of bank statement ... |
|
| 5 | F.S. (Family Suits) 8/2026 | Mst. Qamar un Nisa VS Shams uddin | Imran Ali(ADVO-17369-SBC-KHS) | Family Suit-Restitution of Conjugal Rights | Family suit called. Counsel for plaintiff is present. Defendant called absent. Mr. Mohsin Ali advocate is present and filed vakalatnama on behalf of defendant. Order on it. File. Put up to 24.03.2026 for filling of W/S as last chance. |
||
| 6 | F.S. (Family Suits) 5/2026 | Mst. Mahnoor VS Awais Mirani | Azhar Ali Anjum(ADVO-11760-SBC-KHW) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Family suit called. Plaintiff is absent. Mr. Pervez Ahmed Shar advocate is present and filed Vakalatnama on behalf plaintiff. Order on it. NOC required. Put up to 09.04.2026 for W/S as last chance. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Hearing of Applications | |||||||
| 7 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 96/2025 | Mst. Iqra Salman VS Abdul Rehman Osama Khan | Jamshed A. Shaikh.(ADVO-8896-SBC-KHE),Munsif Ali (ADVO-25135-SBC-KHS) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR),Muhammad Hanif(ADVO-20348-SBC-KHC) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 (For Custody) | G & W called. Applicant is absent her counsel is present. Respondent is present and received copy of application for custody of minor. put up to 18-3-2026. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 8 | F.S. (Family Suits) 178/2023 | Khansa D/O Amjad ahmed VS Muhmmad Nasir S/O Sultan Ali | Muhammad Kashif Imran(ADVO-21460-SBC-MLR) | Family Suit-Recovery of Maintenance,Family Suit-Recovery of Medical Charges / Delivery Expenses ,Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | |||
| 9 | F.S. (Family Suits) 34/2025 | Mst. Syeda Afshan D/o Syed Awais Shareef VS Syed Sumair Mir S/o Syed Mubarak Mir | Suhail Qurban (ADVO-22329-SBC-KHE) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Family suit called. Plaintiff and her counsel are called absent. Defendant is present along with counsel. Family suit is consolidated with G & W 30/2025. matter is adjourned to 07.04.2026 for evidence of plaintiff. Plaintiff is directed to adduce her evidence on next date if fail to do any appropriate order will be passed. |
|
| 10 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 30/2025 | Syed Sumair Mir VS Mst Syeda Afshan | Suhail Qurban (ADVO-22329-SBC-KHE) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 (For Custody) | G & Ward Application is called. Applicant and his counsel are present. None is present from the respondent side. Order passed and announced in open court and on separate sheet and same is re-produced here:- Considering the minor???s age (approximately 3 years), the applicant is allowed interim custody on Eid-ul-Fitr in the following manner: on the 2nd day of Eid-ul-Fitr from 11:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., and for shopping on 17-3-2026 from 4:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. The applicant is strictly directed to provide only home-cooked food to the minor and to return custody to the respondent on time. A bailiff is hereby appointed to supervise the smooth handover and taking of custody of the minor from both sides. The bailiff???s fee is fixed at Rs. 2,000, payable by the applicant, and the bailiff is directed to submit his report after supervision. Matter is fixed on 07.04.2026. For evidence, and order application for reimbursement of expenses, Contempt of court from the respondent side and order on alternate meeting and hearing on application for shifting of meeting venue to fathers residence every Sunday from 10.00 a.m to 09.00 p.m |
||
| 11 | F.S. (Family Suits) 134/2025 | Mst. Marriam Zehra VS Syed Muhammad Zafar hussain | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Family suit called. Counsel for the Plaintiff is absent. Plaintiff and witnesses are called absent. Defendant and his counsel are called absent. Case is put up to 13.04.2026 for plaintiff evidence and hearing on Application for meeting with minors. |
||
| 12 | F.S. (Family Suits) 15/2025 | Mst Kousar Parveen and another VS Muhammad Shareef and another | Zeeshan Ahmed (ADVO-1874-SBC-LRK) | Zakia Sultana(ADVO-22695-SBC-MLR) | Family Suit-Suit for recovery of Gold Ornaments | Family suit called. Counsel for the plaintiff is present and filed statement. Order passed on it. Call both parties in person especially plaintiff. Defendant called absent. Family Suit adjourned to 21.04.2026 for evidence of Plaintiff side and order on application U/s 17-A(i)(ii) of family court act for struck off defense of defendant and hearing on application for leniency of installment from the plaintiff side. Mean while plaintiff side is directed to provide the copies of affidavit in evidence of plaintiff and witnesses. Plaintiff is also directed to adduce her and witnesses evidence if fail to do any appropriate order will be passed. |
|
| 13 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 102/2025 | Qamar un Nisa VS Public at large | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-Application U/S 7 & 10 of Guardian & Ward Act | G&W called. Applicant is absent. counsel for the applicant is also absent. Witness are called absent. Heard. Order passed side of applicant witness is Suo Moto closed. Case is put up to 02-4-2026 respondent evidence. |
||
| 14 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 129/2025 | Taha Shafi S/o Shafi Ahmed VS Rida Awan | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 (For Custody) | G&W application called. Counsel for the applicant is absent. Respondent is also absent. G&W is put up to 30-3-2026 for applicant evidence. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Exparte Evidence | |||||||
| 15 | F.S. (Family Suits) 284/2025 | Mst Bibi Amna VS Akhtar Ali | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Family suit called. Counsel for the Plaintiff is absent. None is appeared from the defendant side. Put up to 31-3-2026 for ex-parte evidence. |
||
| 16 | F.S. (Family Suits) 332/2025 | Mst Rashida VS Aziz Palari | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Counsel for the plaintiff is present None is appeared form the defendant side. Put up to 31-3-2026 for exparty evidence. |
||
| 17 | F.S. (Family Suits) 344/2025 | Mst Jam Zadi VS Mumtaz Ali | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Family suit called. None is present from either side. Put up to 26-3-2026 for ex-parte evidence. |
||
| 18 | F.S. (Family Suits) 388/2025 | Mst Sabiha VS Muhammad Basit | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Family suit called. Counsel for the Plaintiff is present along with plaintiff. None is appeared from the Defendant side. Counsel for the plaintiff submit the ex-parte evidence. Statement of plaintiff is recorded at Exh.P. Argument heard. Judgement pass on separate sheet. Suit is decreed. Announced in open court. |
||
| 19 | F.S. (Family Suits) 17/2026 | Mst.Seema VS Wali Muhammad | Umatul Hafeez(ADVO-140-SBC-THT) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Family suit called. Counsel for the Plaintiff is present along with plaintiff. None is appeared from the Defendant side. Counsel for the plaintiff submit the ex-parte evidence. Statement of plaintiff is recorded at Exh.P. Argument heard. Judgement pass on separate sheet. Suit is decreed. Announced in open court. |
||