| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 342/2025 | M. Sumair S/o Shakeel VS The State | Cr.PC-497 | 263/2025  Samanabad  | 	
	  Case called. Bail application called. ADPP for the State and learned D/C are present. Heard both sides on present bail application and perused the available record. Order passed on separate sheet. The bail is granted and accused may be released on bail subject to furnishing one solvent surety in sum of Rs.25,000/- with P.R bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of this Court. Bail application is hereby disposed off and order announced in open court, accordingly.  | 
  ||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Hearing | |||||||
| 2 | Cr.P.C. 51/2025 | Miss Maryam D/o Zaheer VS Zaheer | N/A-N/A | 213/2025  Gulbahar  | 	
	  In compliance of letter no.. A/C 3923/2025 received from Honorable District & Session Judge Karachi Central, statement of victims/abductee, namely Ms Mariyam as been recorded  | 
  ||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 3 | PPC 273/2025 | The State VS Imran S/o Ramzan | Shamsher Ali(ADVO-21533-SBC-KHS) | PPC-381-A | 596/2024  Azizabad  | 	
	  Case called. Accused Imran is in jail and produced by the jail authority. Learned ADPP for the state is present, while PWs are remained absent. Mr. Shamsher Ali Memon, Advocate, has appeared and filed a Power on behalf of the accused, along with an application seeking the appointment of counsel at state expense, on the grounds that the accused is a pauper. The same is hereby taken on record. Thereafter, learned DC filed application U/s. 249-A Cr.P.C. Notice given to prosecution side for hearing. Heard both side and perused the record. Accused is acquitted from the charge U/s. 249-A Cr.P.C. Order passed and announced, accordingly. Issue acquittal intimation to J/A for compliance as per law.  | 
  |
| 4 | PPC 285/2025 | The State VS Sohail, Umair & Dilawar | Shamsher Ali(ADVO-21533-SBC-KHS) | PPC-34,PPC-381-A | 69/2024  Sharifabad  | 	
	  Case called. Accused Sohail is present on bail, while Dilawar is remained absent and accused Umair is in custody and not produced by the J/A. PWs are absent. ADPP and DC of pauper accused Umair are present. Matter put on 17.11.2025 for evidence/formal. Issue PO for accused Umair. Issue BW against absent accused Dilawar and notice to his surety.  | 
  |
| 5 | PPC 274/2025 | The State VS Kamran Gul S/o Akhtar Gul | Shamsher Ali(ADVO-21533-SBC-KHS) | PPC-381-A | 272/2024  Samanabad  | 	
	  Case called. Accused Kamran Gul is in custody and produced by the J/A. Learned ADPP for the state and learned DC of pauper accused are present. PWs are absent. Put of to 17.11.2025 for evidence. Issue summons to all PWs.  | 
  |
| 6 | PPC 99/2025 | The State VS Awais Khan / Shagufta | Dost Muhammad (ADVO-24624-SBC-KHE) | PPC-381-A | 661/2024  Azizabad  | 	
	  Case called. Accused Owais Khan is in jail and not produced by the jail, while accused Shagufta has already been declared as proclaimed offender. Learned ADPP for the state and DC of pauper accused are present. PWs are absent. Thereafter, learned counsel for the pauper accused filed application U/s. 249-A Cr.P.C. Notice given to prosecution side for hearing. Heard both side and perused the record. Accused is acquitted from the charge U/s. 249-A Cr.P.C. Issue acquittal intimation to J/A for compliance as per law.  | 
  |
| 7 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 1533/2024 | State VS Muhammad Fareed | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (i) (a) | 844/2023  Azizabad  | 	
	  Case called. Accused M.Fareed is on bail, but called absent. ADPP for the state and DC are present. Process returned with police report and PWs HC Abdul Qadir, IO SIP Riazuddin and complainant ASI M.Nazir are present and recorded their evidence at Exh.3, 4 & 5, respectively and they were cross examined, accordingly. Learned ADPP for the state closed his prosecution side vide his statement at Exh.06. Put of to 19.11.2025 for statement of accused. Issue BW against the accused and notice to his surety.  | 
  |
| 8 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 507/2025 | The State VS Majid S/o Jan Wali | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Sindh Arms Act 2013-23-i-A | 88/2025  Gulberg  | 	
	  Case called. Accused Majid is present on bail. ADPP for the state and learned DC are present. Learned DC filed application for condonation of absence, same is kept on record and accused warn to careful in future. Complainant SIP Latif is present and recorded his evidence at Exh.03, accordingly. Matter adjourned to 19.11.2025 for evidence. Issue summons to remaining PWs.  | 
  |
| 9 | PPC 1453/2025 | The State VS Noman and Fahad Ahmed | Bilawal(ADVO-19619-SBC-KHS),Shamsher Ali(ADVO-21533-SBC-KHS) | PPC-392 | 51/2025  Khuwaja Ajmer Nagri  | 	
	  Case called. Accused Noman and Fahad Ahmed are in jail and produced by the J/A. ADPP for the state and learned DCs of pauper accused are present. PWs are absent. The application Us. 249-A Cr.PC for acquittal of accused Fahad Ahmed was also pending for hearing. Matter put on 08.11.2025 for evidence as well as hearing on application Us. 249-A Cr.PC. Issue BW against complainant and summons to remaining PWs.  | 
  |
| 10 | PPC 1462/2025 | The State VS Syed Rehan us Zaman S/o Syed Badih us Zaman | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-392 | 60/2025  Gabol Town  | 	
	  Case called. Accused Syed Rehan uz Zaman is produced by the Jail Authorities, as he confined due to involvement in other crime. Learned ADPP for the State is present. The complainant is also present and has recorded his evidence, which is exhibited as Exhibit 03. He was duly cross-examined. In light of the evidence brought on record, the learned ADPP for the State closed the prosecution???s side by submitting his statement, which is exhibited as Exhibit 04. Thereafter, the statements of the accused under Section 342 Cr.PC. were recorded and exhibited as Exhibit 05. Arguments heard. Record perused. In view of the material on record and after considering the arguments advanced, accused is hereby acquitted under Section 245(1) Cr.PC, as the prosecution has failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt. Let intimation of acquittal be sent to the Jail Authorities for necessary compliance in accordance with law. The bail bond of accused stands cancelled and his surety discharged after expiry of appeal period, accordingly.  | 
  |
| 11 | PPC 1698/2025 | The State VS Faizan S/o Ramzan | Shamsher Ali(ADVO-21533-SBC-KHS) | PPC-381-A | 311/2025  Azizabad  | 	
	  Case called. Learned ADPP is present. Accused Faizan is produced in custody by the Jail Authorities. Learned ADPP for the state and DC of pauper accused are present. In compliance with Section 241-A Cr.P.C, copies of relevant prosecution documents were supplied to the accused, duly acknowledged vide receipt marked as Exh.01. The accused submitted an application for waiver of the mandatory waiting period, which was taken on record as Exh.02. Thereafter, charge was framed against accused, recorded as Exh.03. Upon formal framing of charge, the pleas of the accused was recorded at Exh.3/A . Accused pleaded guilty and requested for mercy from the Court. Additionally, the accused submitted an application pleading guilty, which is placed on record as Exh.04. Subsequently, show cause notices regarding sentencing were issued to accused, marked as Exh.05, to which he submitted his reply, placed on record as Exh.06. After hearing the parties and considering the plea of guilt and replies submitted, the matter was taken up for order. Resultantly, accused, is hereby convicted under Section 243 Cr.P.C on the basis of his voluntary plea of guilt. He is sentenced to undergo imprisonment for the period already undergone in judicial custody, with the benefit of Section 382-B Cr.P.C extended to him. The accused is remanded back to jail, and conviction warrants be issued accordingly for execution of sentence, as per law. Order pronounced in open Court. In compliance of section 371 Cr.PC a copy of order is also supplied to accused on free of cost under the receipt at Exh.07, accordingly.  | 
  |
| 12 | PPC 3382/2025 | The State VS Ali Haider S/o Zulfiqar | PPC-380,PPC-454 | 354/2025  Gulberg  | 	
	  Case called. Accused Ali Haider is present on bail. ADPP for the state is also present. Process returned with police report, but PWs are absent. Matter put on 27.11.2025 for evidence. Issue BW against all PWs.  | 
  ||
| 13 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 995/2025 | The State VS Rafiullah S/o Fazal Haq | SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (I) A | 133/2025  Gabol Town  | 	
	  Case called. Accused Rafiullah is present on bail along with his learned counsel. IO ASI Mashood-ul-Haq is present and recorded his evidence at Exh.03 and cross examined, accordingly. Case is adjourned to 18.11.2025 for evidence. Issue summons to remaining PWs.  | 
  ||
| 14 | PPC 3715/2025 | The State VS Muhammad Rafiq S/o Hazoor Bux | Shamsher Ali(ADVO-21533-SBC-KHS) | PPC-381-A,PPC-411 | 723/2021  Sir Syed  | 	
	  Case called. Accused M.Rafique is produced by the Jail Authorities. Learned ADPP for the State and DC of pauper accused are present. The complainant is also present and has recorded his evidence, which is exhibited as Exhibit 03. He was duly cross-examined. In light of the evidence brought on record, the learned ADPP for the State closed the prosecution???s side by submitting his statement, which is exhibited as Exhibit 04. Thereafter, the statements of the accused under Section 342 Cr.PC. were recorded and exhibited as Exhibit 05. Arguments heard. Record perused. In view of the material on record and after considering the arguments advanced, both accused are hereby acquitted under Section 245(1) Cr.PC, as the prosecution has failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt. Let intimation of acquittal be sent to the Jail Authorities for necessary compliance in accordance with law.  | 
  |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Supply of Copies | |||||||
| 15 | PPC 2649/2024 | THE STATE VS Hurair S/o Ijaz & Naeem @ moosa S/o Joseph Kha | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI) | Shamsher Ali(ADVO-21533-SBC-KHS) | PPC-392 | 329/2024  Rizvia Society  | 	
	  Case called. Accused Hurair is produced by the Central J/A, and accused Naeem @ Moosa is also produced by the Landhi Jail. The ADPP for the state and learned DC of pauper accused are present. Copies were supplied to accused at Exh.01. Charge against the accused is framed at Exh.02 and his plea recorded at Exh.2/A, in which he plead not guilty and claimed trial. Case is adjourned to 17.11.2025 for evidence. Issue summons to all PWs.  | 
  
| 16 | PPC 3421/2024 | THE STATE VS Mehboob S/o Javed | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI) | Shamsher Ali(ADVO-21533-SBC-KHS) | PPC-381-A | 233/2024  Samanabad  | 	
	  Case called. Accused Mehboob is in judicial custody. The Learned ADPP for the state and DC on behalf of pauper accused are present. Copies were supplied to accused at Exh.01. Charge against the accused is framed at Exh.02 and his plea recorded at Exh.2/A, in which he plead not guilty and claimed trial. Case is adjourned to 13.11.2025 for evidence. Issue summons to all PWs and PO for accused.  | 
  
| 17 | PPC 639/2025 | THE STATE VS Shaharyar, Orangzaib and Hamza | Shamsher Ali(ADVO-21533-SBC-KHS) | PPC-392 | 26/2025  Khuwaja Ajmer Nagri  | 	
	  Case called. Accused Sheheryar and Hamza are in jail and accused Hamza produced by the jail. The accused Orangzeb has already been declared as proclaimed offender. Learned ADPP for the state and DC of pauper accused are present. Copies were supplied to accused at Exh.01. Charge against the accused is framed at Exh.02 and his plea recorded at Exh.2/A & 2/B, in which they plead not guilty and claimed trial. Matter put on 17.11.2025 for evidence. Issue summons to all PWs and PO for accused Hamza.  | 
  |
| 18 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 426/2025 | The State VS Abdul Basit S/o Haji Deen | Shamsher Ali(ADVO-21533-SBC-KHS) | Sindh Arms Act 2013-23-i-A | 33/2025  Samanabad  | 	
	  Case called: Accused Abdul Basit is in custody and not produced by the J/A. The ADPP for the state and learned DC of pauper accused are present. Case is adjourned to 12.11.2025 for supply of copies. Issue production warrant (PO) for accused.  | 
  |
| 19 | PPC 1451/2025 | The State VS Imran Baloch S/o Imam Bux | Shamsher Ali(ADVO-21533-SBC-KHS) | PPC-381-A | 43/2025  Azizabad  | 	
	  Case called: Accused Abdul Imran Balouch is in custody and not produced by the J/A. The ADPP for the state and learned DC of pauper accused are present. Case is adjourned to 13.11.2025 for supply of copies. Issue PO for accused.  | 
  |
| 20 | PPC 4222/2025 | The State VS 1.Muhammad Adnan S/o Abdul Qayyum, 2.Muhammad Rashid S/o Ilahi Bux | PPC-382,PPC-411 | 331/2025  Azizabad  | 	
	  Case called. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Accused M.Adnan is present on bail along with his counsel, while accused M.Arshad is produced in custody by the Jail Authorities. Learned ADPP for the state and DC of pauper accused M.Rashid are present. In compliance with Section 241-A Cr.P.C, copies of relevant prosecution documents were supplied to the accused, duly acknowledged vide receipt marked as Exh.01. The accused submitted an application for waiver of the mandatory waiting period, which was taken on record as Exh.02. Thereafter, charge was framed against accused, recorded as Exh.03. Upon formal framing of charge, the pleas of the accused was recorded at Exh.3/A & 3/B. Both the accused pleaded guilty and requested for mercy from the Court. Additionally, the accused separately submitted application pleading guilty, which is placed on record as Exh.04 & 05. Subsequently, show cause notices regarding sentencing were issued to accused, marked as Exh.06, to which they submitted his reply, placed on record as Exh.07. After hearing the parties and considering the plea of guilt and replies submitted, the matter was taken up for order. Resultantly, accused, are hereby convicted under Section 243 Cr.P.C on the basis of their voluntary plea of guilt. They both are sentenced to undergo imprisonment for the period already undergone in judicial custody, with the benefit of Section 382-B Cr.P.C extended to them and fine amount of Rs.6,000/- is also imposed upon the accused M.Adnan, who is on bail, in default he shall be taken into custody for one month more. The fine amount has been deposited before Nazir of this Court and produce its receipt. The accused M.Rashid is remanded back to jail, and conviction warrants be issued accordingly for execution of sentence, as per law. Order pronounced in open Court. In compliance of section 371 Cr.PC a copy of order is also supplied to both accused on free of cost under the receipt at Exh.08, accordingly.  | 
  ||
| 21 | PPC 4219/2025 | The State VS Yousuf Mohsin S/o Syed Moazam Hussain | PPC-381-A | 372/2025  Jauharabad  | 	
	  Case called. Accused Yousuf Mohsin is in jail and not produced. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Matter is adjourned to 07.11.2025 for SOC. Issue PO for accused.  | 
  ||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Formal Cases | |||||||
| 22 | PPC 2773/2024 | THE STATE VS Rasool Bux @ Dada S/o Abdil Ghaffar | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-392 | 259/2023  Rizvia Society  | 	
	  Case called. Accused Rasool Bux @ Dada is absent despite repeated calls. Learned ADPP for the State is present. Proclamation proceedings under Sections 87 and 88 Cr.P.C were issued against the accused and have been returned duly executed with the endorsement of the Process Server. Statement of Process Server is recorded and placed on record as Exh.3. Report of Process Server is marked as Exh.3/A. Copies of proclamations under Sections 87 and 88 Cr.P.C are available on record as Exh.3/B and Exh.3/C, respectively. Upon consideration of the record and compliance with legal formalities, Order passed and accused is/are hereby declared a proclaimed offender(absconder). The surety bonds are forfeited, and surety documents are ordered to be confiscated to the State. The matter is ordered to be consigned to dormant file as against the absconding/absent accused. Let a perpetual (lifetime) warrant of arrest be issued against the absconding/absent accused for execution in accordance with law. Order pronounced in open Court.  | 
  
| 23 | PPC 240/2025 | The State VS Attualllah & others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-381-A | 619/2024  Khuwaja Ajmer Nagri  | 	
	  Case called. Accused Attaullah is absent despite repeated calls. Learned ADPP for the State is present. Proclamation proceedings under Sections 87 and 88 Cr.P.C were issued against the accused and have been returned duly executed with the endorsement of the Process Server. Statement of Process Server is recorded and placed on record as Exh.6. Report of Process Server is marked as Exh.6/A. Copies of proclamations under Sections 87 and 88 Cr.P.C are available on record as Exh.6/B and Exh.6/C, respectively. Upon consideration of the record and compliance with legal formalities, Order passed and accused is/are hereby declared a proclaimed offender(absconder). The surety bonds are forfeited, and surety documents are ordered to be confiscated to the State. The matter is ordered to be consigned to dormant file as against the absconding/absent accused. Let a perpetual (lifetime) warrant of arrest be issued against the absconding/absent accused for execution in accordance with law. Order pronounced in open Court.  | 
  |
| 24 | PPC 633/2025 | THE STATE VS Usama and Ainul Hassan | Shamsher Ali(ADVO-21533-SBC-KHS) | PPC-381-A | 26/2025  Rizvia Society  | 	
	  Case called. Accused Ainul Hassan is produced by the jail authority and co-accused Usama is called absent. ADPP for the state and learned DC of pauper accused are present. BW against absent accused Usama and notice to his surety returned with unserved report and kept on record. Case is adjourned to 12.11.2025 for framing of charge/formal. Issue NBW against absent accused Usama and call process server in person.  | 
  |
| 25 | PPC 2096/2025 | The State VS Saeed @ Muhamamd S/o Zaman Khan | PPC-381-A | 101/2025  Gabol Town  | 	
	  Case called. The accused, Saeed @ Muhammad, is on bail. Learned ADPP for the State and DC are present. Copies were supplied to accused at Exh.01. Charge against the accused is framed at Exh.02 and his plea recorded at Exh.2/A, in which he plead not guilty and claimed trial. The complainant had appeared and submitted an application, duly supported by an affidavit, stating that he does not wish to pursue the matter further against the accused and has no objection if the accused is acquitted by this Court. The said application/affidavit is taken on record and exhibited as Exhibit-03 and treated as his evidence. In light of the complainant???s statement, the learned ADPP for the State submitted that the prosecution does not wish to lead any further evidence. Accordingly, the prosecution evidence is closed. The statement of the learned ADPP is taken on record and marked as Exhibit-04. Subsequently, the statement of the accused under Section 342 Cr.P.C. was recorded and is exhibited as Exhibit-05. Arguments heard. Record perused. In view of the material available on record and after hearing the arguments advanced by both sides, it is evident that the prosecution has failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Therefore, accused is hereby acquitted under Section 245(1) Cr.P.C. Judgment passed and announced in open Court, accordingly.  | 
  ||