| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 320/2026 | Awais Muhammad & others VS The State | Mir Mal (ADVO-4078-SBC-HYD) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-498 | 30/2026 Sinjhoro |
ABA called. Applicants/accused are present on interim pre-arrest bail. Mr. Iqrar Ali advocate appeared and filed Vakalatnama on behalf of applicants/accused. Order on it. File. ADPP for the state is present. Notice issued to Complainant and returned served. Complainant is present and filed adjournment application. Order on it. Allowed as prayed. Put off to 02.04.2026, for confirmation or otherwise. Applicants/accused are directed to attend. |
| 2 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 339/2026 | Khalid & another VS The State | Hasnain(ADVO-510-SBC-SGR) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-498 | / |
ABA called. Applicants/accused are present on interim pre-arrest bail. Mr. Hasnain Nizamani advocate applicants/accused is called absent. ADPP for the state is present. Notice issued to Complainant and returned served. Complainant is present. Mr. Muhammad Rizwan Hassan jeelani advocate appeared and filed Vakalatnama on behalf of complainant alongwith adjournment application. Order on it. Put off to 02.04.2026, for confirmation or otherwise. Applicants/accused are directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 3 | PPC 74/2025 | The State VS Nabi Dad and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Abdul Jabbar Panhwar(),Ghulam Hussain(ADVO-403-SBC-SGR),Parvez Ahmed(ADVO-676-SBC-SGR),Zafar Hayat(ADVO-404-SBC-SGR) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-324,PPC-353 | 267/2024 Sanghar |
Case called. Accused Nabi Dad, Ameerullah and Murad are Called absent without any intimation or application. Accused Roshan is produced in custody from District Prison and Correctional facility Sanghar. Accused Faqeer Muhammad @ Faqeero, and Ghulam Hyder have already been declared as Proclaimed offenders. ADPP for the state is present. Mr. Parvez Ahmed Bugti advocate for accused Nabi Dad is absent. Mr. Ghulam Hussain Baloch advocate for accused Muhammad Murad is present. Mr. Hussain Bux Chang advocate for accused Roshan is present. Process return served or un-served. Complainant ASI Zulfiqar Ali is present. Issue NBW agaisnt accused Nabi Dad, Ameerulalh and Murad and notice their sureties. Repeat summons to R/P.Ws. Call case property. Put off to 20.04.2026, for evidence. Accused Roshan is remanded back to custody. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 491 | |||||||
| 4 | Application u/s 491 CrPc 90/2026 | Wazeer Bheel VS SSP Sanghar & Others | Suneel(ADVO-346-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-491 | / |
Crl. Misc Application called. Applicant and his counsel are present. SHO PS Perumal produced the alleged detainee through ASI Abdul Nabi Brohi alongwith memo and report. Order on it. Statement of detainee is recorded. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open Court. The instant Criminal Misc; application stands disposed of accordingly. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 5 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 540/2026 | Shahzad VS Akram & another | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-22-A | / |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 6 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 66/2026 | The State VS Haji | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Shamsher Alam(ADVO-52143-SBC-SGR) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 3/2026 Sinjhoro |
Case called. Accused Haji is produced in custody from District Prison and Correctional Facility Sanghar. DDPP for the state is present. Mr. Shamsher Alam Chang advocate for accused is present. Charge framed accused at???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????..Ex.02. Plea of accused is recorded R&R at?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????..Ex.03 Accused pleaded not guilty and claimed to be trial. Issue summons to Complainant and P.Ws Call case property. The record shows this case is connected with main Sessions Case No.65/2026 SV Taj Ali & others U/S 324,353 34, PPC, Crime No.02/2026 of P.S Sinjhoro, which case has been adjourned Put off to 15.04.2026, for evidence Accused is remanded back to custody |
| 7 | PPC 65/2026 | The State VS Taj Ali & others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Shamsher Alam(ADVO-52143-SBC-SGR) | PPC-324,PPC-34,PPC-353 | 2/2026 Sinjhoro |
Case called. Accused Taj Ali, Haji and Porho @ Chhutto are produced in custody from District Prison and Correctional Facility Sanghar. Accused Arshad @ Arsho shown in challan charge sheet as died. ADPP for the state is present. Mr. Shamsher Alam Chang advocate, for Taj Ali and Haji is Present. Mr. Ghulam Hussain advocate appeared and filed Vakalatnama on behalf of accused Porho @ chhutto. Order on it. File. Charge framed against accused persons at ?????????????????????????????????????????????.Ex.02. Plea of accused Taj Ali is recorded R&R at?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????..Ex.03 Plea of accused Haji is recorded R&R at????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????..Ex.04 Plea of accused Porho @ Chhutto is recorded R&R at???????????????????????????????????????..Ex.05 Accused pleaded not guilty and claimed to be trial. Issue summons to Complainant and P.ws. Call case property. Put off to 15.04.2026, for evidence. Accused are remanded back to custody. |
| 8 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 67/2026 | The State VS Taj Ali | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Shamsher Alam(ADVO-52143-SBC-SGR) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 4/2026 Sinjhoro |
Case called. Accused Taj Ali is produced in custody from District Prison and Correctional Facility Sanghar. DDPP for the state is present. Mr. Shamsher Alam Chang advocate for accused is present. Charge framed accused at???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????..Ex.02. Plea of accused is recorded R&R at?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????..Ex.03 Accused pleaded not guilty and claimed to be trial. Issue summons to Complainant and P.Ws Call case property. The record shows this case is connected with main Sessions Case No.65/2026 SV Taj Ali & others U/S 324,353 34, PPC, Crime No.02/2026 of P.S Sinjhoro, which case has been adjourned Put off to 15.04.2026, for evidence Accused is remanded back to custody. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 9 | Criminal Revisions 11/2026 | Taj Muhammad VS The State | Iqdad Ali(ADVO-53266-SBC-KHS) | Cr.PC-439,Cr.PC-U/S 435 Criminal Revision | / |
Criminal Revision Application called. Applicant present and his counsel are present. Notice not issued due not none provide copies. The advocate to applicant is directed to submitted 2 set of copies. Issue notice to respondents. Put off to 07.04.2026, for service. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION Compliance | |||||||
| 1 | Summary Suits 47/2025 |
Muhammad Amjad VS Ishfaque Ahmed | Suneel(ADVO-346-SBC-SGR) | Faisal Khan(ADVO-538-SBC-SGR) | Summary suit called. Both parties and their counsel are present. Today matter is fixed for compliance U/O 10 Rule 2 CPC, which was held between the parties, but the parties raised their allegations against each other as they have already denied. Order passed order sheet. Compliance U/ O 10 Rule 2 CPC stands failed. The learned counsels for both the parties are directed to file/ submit draft issues on the next date of hearing. Put off to 10.04.2026, for draft issues. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 2 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 108/2025 |
Syed Ali Raza Shah & Others VS Syed Hizbullah Shah & Others | Muhammad Yaseen(ADVO-324-SBC-SGR) | Abdul Sattar (ADVO-292-SBC-MTY),DDA(DDA-0001-GOV-SGR),Sarfaraz Ahmed(ADVO-485-SBC-SGR) | Civil Appeal called. Appellant No.1 himself as well as Attorney of other appellants and his counsel are present. Attorney of respondents No.1 to 5 namely Ali Dino Shah and his Counsel Mr. Sarfraz Ahmed advocate are present. Respondent No,8,9 (a),11, 12 14, 17, 18, L.Rs respondent No.07 and 16 and their counsel Mr. Abdul Sattar advocate are called absent. Official respondents are called absent. Mr. Waseem Ahmed DDA for official respondents is present. Respondent No.16 (C) and behalf of the respondent No. 16(a, b to g) e is called absent. L.Rs of respondent No. 10(b) Gulzar himself and on behalf respondent No.10 (c and d) is called absent and their counsel Mr. Ghulam Hussain Baloch is present. Today matter is fixed for appearance L.Rs of respondents No.07 but they did not appear. Put off to 10.04.2026, for further proceedings. |
||
| 3 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 113/2025 |
Syed Hizbullah Shah & Others VS Syed Ali Raza Shah & Others | Sarfaraz Ahmed(ADVO-485-SBC-SGR) | Abdul Sattar (ADVO-292-SBC-MTY),DDA(DDA-0001-GOV-SGR),Muhammad Yaseen(ADVO-324-SBC-SGR) | Civil Appeal Called. Attorney of appellant and his counsel are present. Respondent No.1 himself as well as attorney of respondent No.2 to 13 and his counsel Mr. Muhammad Yaseen advocate are present. Respondents No. 17(a),19, 22, 20, 25, 26, L.Rs of respondent No.15 and 24 and their counsel Mr. Abdul Sattar advocate are called absent. Official respondents are called absent. Mr. Javed Ahmed DDA for official respondents is present. L.Rs of Respondent No. 24(f) is called absent. L.Rs of respondent No. 18(b) Gulzar himself and on behalf respondent No.18 (c and d) is called absent and their counsel Mr. Ghulam Hussain Baloch is present. L.Rs of respondent No.15 are called absent. The advocate for appellant has filed statement alongwith Publication in daily newspapers Kawish dated 25.03.2026 at (Ex.29). Order on it. File. Order passed on order sheet. The service against L.Rs of respondents No.15 is hereby ordered to be held good. Put off to 10.04.2026, for service appearance of L.Rs of respondents No.15 |
||
| 4 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 209/2025 |
Mst. Mumtaz Begum Since dead through her LRs VS Federation of Pakistan & Others | Tarique Mehboob(ADVO-165-SBC-SGR) | DDA(DDA-0001-GOV-SGR),Safdar Kamal(ADVO-1024-SBC-SUK) | Civil Appeal called. Appellant No.1 himself as well as attorney other appellants are called absent, his junior is present. Respondents No.1 to 4 are called absent. Mr. Safdar Kamal Law officer NADRA of respondent No.1 to 4 called absent, while Syed Waseem Natiq Assistant NADRA is present. Respondent No.5 called absent. Mr. Waseem, Ahmed DDA for official respondent No.4 is present. Respondent No.6 & 7 is called absent. The Junior advocate for appellant has filed statement alongwith publication in daily newspapers Nawa-e-waqat Lahore dated 08.03.2026 at (Ex.10) Order on it. Order passed on order sheet. The service against respondent No. 6 & 7 is hereby ordered to held good. Put off to 10.04.2026, for appearance respondents No. 6 & 7. |
||
| 5 | Summary Suits 4/2026 |
Ghulam Mustafa VS Jan Muhammad | Asad Jahangir(ADVO-401-SBC-SGR) | Summary suit Called. Plaintiff is called absent and his counsel is present. Notice not issued against defendant due non-payment of process fee. The learned counsel for plaintiff has filed application for Condonation at (Ex.08). Order on it. Condoned with warning. Repeat notice against defendant through bailiff by way of pasting and TCS on costs. Put off to 10.04.2026, for service. |
|||
| 6 | Summary Suits 8/2026 |
Majid Ali VS Adnan Ali | Muhammad Sharif Misrani(ADVO-268-SBC-SGR) | ||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 7 | Defamation Suits 1/2026 |
Sozal & another VS Haji Pasand Khan & another | Anwar Shahzad(ADVO-367-SBC-SGR) | Sarfaraz Ahmed(ADVO-485-SBC-SGR) | Matter called. Plaintiffs are present and their Counsel is called absent. Defendants are called and their counsel Mr: Sarfraz Ahmed is present and filed adjournment application at (Ex.10) Order on it. Allowed as prayed. Put off to 07.04.2026, for written statement of defendant No.01. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Hearing of Applications | |||||||
| 8 | Summary Suits 31/2024 |
Ghulam Sarwar VS Abdul Hameed | Sumaira(ADVO-814-SBC-SGR) | Kaleem Ullah (ADVO-669-SBC-SGR) | Summary suit Called. Both parties and their counsel are present. Order passed on application U/S 151 CPC. The instant application U/S 151 CPC is devoid of merits and appears to be an attempt to delay the proceedings of the summary suit. Consequently, the same is hereby dismissed. Put off to 02.04.2026, for defendant side evidence. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 9 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 255/2024 |
Muhammad Ali VS Arshad Ali Khan & Others | Naseer Ahmed(ADVO-701-SBC-SGR) | DDA(DDA-0001-GOV-SGR),Suneel(ADVO-346-SBC-SGR) | Civil Appeal called. L.Rs of Appellant Ali Muhammad himself as well as attorney other appellants and his counsel Mr. Naseer Ahmed are present. Respondent No.1 is called absent and his Counsel Mr. Suneel Kumar advocate is present. Official respondents are called absent. Mr. Waseem Ahmed DDA for official respondents is present. The advocate for appellant has filed adjournment application at (Ex.28). Order on it. Allowed as prayed. Put off to 15.04.2026, for arguments/objection on application U/S 41 Rule 27 C.P.C |
||
| 10 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 11/2026 |
Raj Kumar & another VS Chief Executive Hyderabad Electric Supply Company (HESCO) Hyderabad & Others | Muhammad Yaseen(ADVO-324-SBC-SGR) | Khalil Ahmed (ADVO-565-SBC-SGR) | Civil Appeal called. Appellant is called absent, while his counsel is present. All respondents are called absent, while their counsel Mr. Khalil Ahmed Baloch is absent. The advocate for appellant has filed adjournment application at (Ex. Put off to 16.04.2026, for further arguments. |
||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 23/2026 | Mst. Shamim VS Public at Large | Ayaz Ali (ADVO-731-SBC-SGR) | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-278 | |||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 2 | G.W. A. (G&W Appeals) 11/2025 | Mst. Sahib Khatoon VS Mumtaz Ali & Others | Muhammad Yaseen(ADVO-324-SBC-SGR) | Rab Dino(ADVO-648-SBC-SGR) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 47 (Guardian Appeal ) | Guardian Appeal called. Appellant is called absent and his counsel Mr. Muhammad Yasin is present. Attorney of opponent No.1 is present and her counsel Mr. Rab Dino Mangrio advocate is called absent. Attorney of opponent No.1 has filed adjournment application at (Ex.15). Order on it. Allowed as prayed. Put off to 09.04.2026, for arguments. |
|
| 3 | G.W. A. (G&W Appeals) 10/2025 | Aijaz Ali VS Public at Large | Muhammad Yaseen(ADVO-324-SBC-SGR) | Rab Dino(ADVO-648-SBC-SGR) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 47 (Guardian Appeal ) | Guardian Appeal called. Appellant called absent and his counsel Mr. Muhammad Yasin is present. Opponent No.02 is present and her counsel Mr. Rab Dino Mangrio advocate is called absent. Opponent No.02 has filed adjournment application at (Ex.14). Order on it. Allowed as prayed. Put off to 09.04.2026, for arguments. |
|
| 4 | F.A. (Family Appeals) 45/2025 | Aijaz Ali VS Mst. Zubaida & Others | Muhammad Yaseen(ADVO-324-SBC-SGR) | Rab Dino(ADVO-648-SBC-SGR) | Family Appeal-Section 14 of Family Court Act | ||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Succession Miscellaneous Applications | |||||||
| 5 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 81/2025 | Mst. Maryam VS Public at Large | Naeem Ahmed(ADVO-458-SBC-SGR) | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-372 | Succession Application called. Applicant is called absent and her counsel is present. Opponents are called absent. The learned counsel for applicant has filed adjournment application at (Ex.16). Order on it. Allowed as prayed. Put 07.04.2026, for appearance of opponents. |
||