| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Supply of Copies | |||||||
| 1 | SC (Murder Trial) 85/2026 | The State VS Abid Hussain & Others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-SGR),Housh Muhammad Mangi(),Jamsheed(ADVO-595-SBC-SGR) | PPC-109,PPC-302,PPC-34 | / |
Case called. Accused Abid Hussain Brohi, Raham Ali, Ali Hassan, Asif Iqbal, Sarfraz Ahmed and Sardar Ali are present on interim pre-arrest bail. The complainant and his Learned advocate are present. Special Prosecutor for FIA is called absent without intimation. Today at 10:15 A.M, learned advocate for accused Raham Ali submitted statement through his junior. order passed on it. Perusal of the R&P and record reflects that the interim challan has been treated as a final challan. The Investigating Officer (I.O.) as well as the Special Public Prosecutor (SPP), FIA, have chosen to remain absent without any intimation. Accused Asif Iqbal has submitted an application, order passed on it. notice to I/O of the case. Put off to 11.7.2026 for supply of papers/ hearing on two pending applications. Accused are directed to attend. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 2 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 825/2026 | Gul Sher VS The State | Sumaira(ADVO-814-SBC-SGR) | Atta Muhammad(ADVO-320-SBC-SGR),DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-498 | 155/2025 Sinjhoro |
A.B.A. Called. Applicant/Accused and his counsel are present. ADPP for the state is present. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open Court. Interim pre-arrest bail earlier granted to applicant/accused is hereby confirmed on same terms and conditions with directions to co-operate with investigation officer or to face the trial. Intimation be sent to concerned SHO/I.O for information and compliance. |
| 3 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 884/2026 | Abdul Ghafoor & others VS The State | Iqrar Ali Panhwar(ADVO-581-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-498 | 67/2026 Perumal |
A.B.A. Called. Applicants/ Accused Abdul Ghafoor, Ali Gul, MUhammads Khan @ Nanu, Muhammad Nawaz @ Lambu, Allah Warrayo and Pehlwan are present on interim pre-arrest bail. Advocate for Applicant/Accused is present. ADPP for the state is present. Notice issued against complainant and returned served through phone cell. Complainant is present. Mr. Zafar Hayat advocate appeared and filed vakalatnama alongwith adjournment application on behalf of Complainant. Order passed thereon. File. Put off to 06-07-2026 for confirmation or otherwise. Present accused are directed to attend. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Supply of Copies | |||||||
| 4 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 253/2026 | The State VS Mushtaque Ali | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 58/2026 Sinjhoro |
Case called. Accused Mukhtaque Ali is present on bail. ADPP for the state is present. Police paper supplied to accused vide receipt u/s 265-C Cr.P.C at Ex:01. Put off to 10.07.2026 for Charge. Accused is directed to attend. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Statement of Accused | |||||||
| 5 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 30/2026 | The State VS Ghulam Hussain @ Phinto | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-SGR) | Hussain Bux(ADVO-438-SBC-SGR) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 149/2025 Sinjhoro |
Case called. Accused Ghulam Hussain @ Fanto is produced Physically from District Prison and correctional Facility Sanghar. ADPP for the State is present. Statement U/S 342 Cr.P.C of accused Ghulam Hussain @ Fanto is recorded at Ex.11. Final arguments heard. Judgment passed and announced in open Court. Accused Ghulam Hussain @ Fanto is acquitted u/s 265 H (i) Cr.P.C. Office is directed to issue acquittal writ of accused with direction to jailor to release the accused Ghulam Hussain @ Fanto if he is not required in any other custody case. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Final Arguments | |||||||
| 6 | PPC 111/2025 | The State VS Ghulam Hyder & others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Rab Dino(ADVO-648-SBC-SGR),Sumaira(ADVO-814-SBC-SGR) | PPC-324,PPC-34,PPC-353 | 15/2025 Sinjhoro |
Case called. Accused Mazhar and Naveed are present on bail. Accused Ghulam Hussain @ Fanto and Ghulam Hyder are produced through video link in custody from District Prison Sanghar. ADPP for the State is present. Miss Sumaira Abullah advocate for accused Ghulam Hussain @ Fanto Naveed is present. Mr. Rab Dino Mangrio advocate for accused Ghulam Hyder and Mazhar is present Final arguments heard. Judgment passed and announced in open Court. Accused Ghulam Hyder, Ghulam Hussain @ Fanto, Mazhar and Naveed are acquitted u/s 265 H (i) Cr.P.C. Accused Mazhar and Naveed are present on bail their bail bond stands cancelled and sureties discharged Office is directed to issue acquittal writ of accused with direction to jailor to release the accused Ghulam Hyder and Ghulam Hussain @ Fanto if he is not required in any other custody case. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION Compliance | |||||||
| 1 | Summary Suits 30/2025 |
Tarique Khan VS Muhammad Juman | Daleep Kumar(ADVO-569-SBC-SGR) | Iftakhar Hussain (ADVO-3901-SBC-HYD) | Summary suit called. Plaintiff and his counsel are called absent. Defendant and his counsel are present. File, Mr Jamshed advocate appeared and submitted power on behalf of plaintiff alongwith statement and case laws at Ex: 17 and Ex:18.Order passed thereon. Put off to 16.07.2026 for compliance U/O 10 Rule 2 CPC/ further argument on application U/O VII Rule 11 CPC and Hearing on application U/S 33.35,37,38 and 40 of the stamp ACT 1899 for calling, imponding and regularization of promissory note and other documents. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 2 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 73/2011 |
Province of Sindh and others VS Abdul Haq | DDA(DDA-0001-GOV-SGR) | Jamsheed(ADVO-595-SBC-SGR) | Civil Appeal is called. The appellants are absent, while the learned DDA representing the appellants is present. The respondent is called absent and his Counsel Mr. Jamshed Leghari is present. Mukhtiarkar HQ Sanghar Rizwan Ali is present and examined on oath. Deposition of Mukhtiarkar HQ Sanghar Rizwan Ali is recorded at Ex.30. He has produced notice of this Court, Authority letter, and photo copies of Two pages A form at Ex. 30/A to Ex: 30/D, No other Officials witnesses are Present. Repeat summons to Mukhtiarkar Sanghar. Put off to 10.07.2026, for evidence. |
||
| 3 | Summary Suits 8/2026 |
Majid Ali VS Adnan Ali | Muhammad Sharif Misrani(ADVO-268-SBC-SGR) | Summary suit Called. Plaintiff and his counsel are present. Defendant is called absent has already been declared as ex-parte and debarred from proceedings. Mr. Ibrar Hussain advocate appeared and submitted power on behalf of Plaintiff. Order passed on it. File. Mr. Muhammad Nisar advocate appeared and submitted power on behalf Branch Manager HBL Microfinance Bank Sanghar Khalique Rehman. Order passed on it. File. Branch Manager HBL Microfinance Bank Sanghar Khalique Rehman is present and examined on oath. Deposition of Branch Manager HBL Microfinance Bank Sanghar Khalique Rehman is recorded at Ex.14. He has produced notice of this Court, letter and photo copy of cheque at Ex. 14/A to Ex: 14/C, Put off to 08.07.2026 for argument. |
|||
| 4 | Defamation Suits 1/2026 |
Sozal & another VS Haji Pasand Khan & another | Anwar Shahzad(ADVO-367-SBC-SGR) | Sarfaraz Ahmed(ADVO-485-SBC-SGR) | Defamation suit Called. Plaintiff is present and his counsel is called absent. Defendant NO: 01 and his counsel are present. Defendant NO: 02 is called absent. Matter adjourned in the interest of justice. Put off to 16.07.2026 for Evidence of plaintiff Side. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 5 | S. Ex. (Summary Executions) 2/2026 |
Inayatullah VS Asif Shafique | Zafar Hayat(ADVO-404-SBC-SGR) | Execution Application called. Plaintiff/Decree Holder is and his counsel is present. Defendant/J.D is called absent. The service against defendant/J.D is hereby order to be held good. Put off 13.07.2025, for appearance defendant/J.D |
|||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 39/2026 | Mst. Maryam VS Public at Large | Muhammad Nisar(ADVO-304-SBC-SGR) | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-SGR) | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-372 | Succession Application called. Applicant and her counsel are present. Reports received from SHO PS Sinjhoro. at (Ex:08) Order passed on it. The advocate for applicant has filed statement alongwith Publication daily news paper Awami Awaz dated 01.07.2026 at (Ex.09). Order passed on it. Put 04.07.2026, for Hearing. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 2 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 28/2026 | Mst. Farzana Ilyas VS Public at Large | Waqar Hussain(ADVO-468-SBC-SGR) | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-372 | Succession Application called. Applicant and his counsel are present. Opponents No.03 to 07 are present and they have filed affidavits, wherein they have given no objections to grant succession application at (Ex.10 to 13) Order passed on it. Two persons namely Ahsan Ali and Iftikhar Ali are present and they have also filed their affidavits in support of the contentions of applicant (Ex: 14 and Ex: 15). Order passed on it.Heard arguments. Order passed on application U/S 32 Rule 3 CPC, the instant application has been allowed. Order passed and announced in open Court. Succession Application is allowed subject to execute of PR Bond in the total amount. However, in order to avoid any complication and to safeguard the interest of parties, Accountant of Honourable District Court Sanghar is appointed as Commissioner to collect amount from concerned quarter as mentioned in para No.5 (supra), and disburse the same amongst applicant and opponent Nos. 3 to 5 as per their shares according to Muhammaden Law under proper receipt. So far share of opponent No. 6 is concerned, as he is minor, as such, in order to safeguard his interest, Accountant of Honourable District Court Sanghar is further directed to invest the share of minor opponent No. 6 in profitable scheme of National Savings Center, Sanghar till he attains the age of majority or as per order the competent court of law. Advocate for applicant is directed to produce the share list of legal heirs within one week. Application stands disposed of in above terms. |
||