| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 428/2026 | Muhammad Akram & others VS The State | Muhammad Rehan Raffique(ADVO-734-SBC-SGR) | Muhammad Rizwan Hasan Jillani(ADVO-622-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-498 | 31/2026 Mangli |
A.B.A Called. Applicants/accused (1) Muhammad Akram, (2) Jahid Ali, (3) Shahid Mehmood, (4) Imran Ali, (5) Iftikhar Ali and (6) Sajjad Mehmood are present on interim pre-arrest bail. The advocate for applicants/accused is present. Complainant and his counsel are present. The learned ADPP for the state is present. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open Court. The applicants/accused (1) Muhammad Akram, (2) Jahid Ali, (3) Shahid Mehmood, (4) Imran Ali have made out a case for confirmation of bail, therefore, interim pre-arrest bail earlier granted to them except accused Iftikhar Ali and Sajjad Mehmood is hereby confirmed on same terms and conditions with directions to co-operate with Investigation Officer or to face the trial. The bail of applicants/accused Iftikhar Ali and Sajjad Mehmood is hereby declined and ad interim bail earlier granted to them is hereby recalled and surety discharged. Intimation be sent SHO/I.O concerned for information and compliance. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 2 | PPC 1/2025 | The State VS Ghulam Nabi and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Gohar Ali Shah(ADVO-2949-SBC-KHP) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-324,PPC-337-H,PPC-427,PPC-447,PPC-504 | 106/2024 Mangli |
Case called. Accused Amb, Muhammad Yousif, Saddam Hussain, Yasir Mehmood and Gul are present on bail. While accused Ghulam Nabi is called absent. ADPP for the state is present. Mr. Zafar Hayat advocate for all accused is present and submitted application for excuse of absnce of accused Accused Ghulam Nabi.Order passed on it. Complainant and his counsel Mr. Muhammad Ashraf Rehmani are present.Process returned served upon complainant through phone cell. No other Pws are present. Repeat summons to R/P.Ws. Put off to 07.05.2026, for evidence. Present accused are directed to attend |
| 3 | PPC 521/2025 | The State VS Ghulam Nabi and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Gohar Ali Shah(ADVO-2949-SBC-KHP) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-324,PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-Fi,PPC-337-H,PPC-506-B | 109/2025 Mangli |
Case called. Accused Ghulam Nabi, Saddam S/o Amb Imdad Ali, Ghalib, Ghulam Shabbir, Pahlo @ Pehlwan, Saddam S/O Liaquat, Muhammad Yousif, Amb, Wazeer, Liaquat Ali, Rafique and Yasir are present on bail. Accused Ghulam Nabi is called absent. Accused Gulzar has already been declared as proclaimed offender. ADPP for the state is present. Mr. Zafar Hayat advocate for all accused is present and submitted application for excuse of absence of accused Ghulam Nabi. Absence condoned. Complainant and his counsel Mr. Hasnain Nizamani are called absent. Process is returned un-served. Repeat summons to Complainant and P.Ws. Call case property (if any). Put off to 07.05.2026, for evidence. Accused are directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 4 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 787/2026 | Tariq Hussain VS SSP Sanghar & Others | Bhagwan Das (ADVO-692-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I),Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Criminal Miscellaneous Application called. Applicant and his counsel are present. Reports are received from SHO PS Sanghar and In-charge S.P. Complaint Cell Sanghar. Order on it. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open Court. The instant application stands disposed of accordingly. |
|
| 5 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 812/2026 | Muhammad Awais VS SSP Sanghar & Others | Muhammad Jahangir(ADVO-588-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Criminal Miscellaneous Application called. Applicant and his counsel are present. Reports are received from SHO PS Sanghar and In-charge S.P. Complaint Cell Sanghar. Order on it. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open Court. The instant application stands disposed of accordingly. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Surety Proceedings | |||||||
| 6 | PPC 550/2023 | The State VS Meer Hassan & others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR),Zafar Hayat(ADVO-404-SBC-SGR) | Hasnain(ADVO-510-SBC-SGR),Hussain Bux Mari(ADVO-483-SBC-SGR),Muhammad Yaseen(ADVO-324-SBC-SGR) | PPC-337-H,PPC-395 | 31/2023 Perumal |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Further Proceedings | |||||||
| 1 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 19/2025 |
Muhammad Saleem VS Haji Nihaluddin through LRs and others | Haji Khan(ADVO-479-SBC-SGR) | Civil Appeal called. Appellant is present and submitted adjournment Application. Order passed on it and his counsel is called absent. L.Rs of Respondents No. 1(a to c) is called absent and their counsel is present. Official respondent are called absent. Mr. Javed Ahmed DDA for official respondents is present. Report not received from Survey Superintendent of Mirpurkhas Division to produce the relevant record. Issue reminder for the same. R&Ps received from trial Court. Put off to 14.05.2026, for arguments/submission of relevant record. |
|||
| 2 | S. Ex. (Summary Executions) 3/2025 |
Noman Khan VS Basheer Ahmed | Gohar Ali Shah(ADVO-2949-SBC-KHP) | Civil execution Application called. Plaintiff/D.H is called absent and his counsel is present and submitted statement alongwith photo copyof Form VII. Order passed on it. Defendant/J.D is called absent and service has already been held good. The Judgment Debtor is directed to deposit an amount of Rs: 15,00,000/- in compliance of decree. In case of failure, writ of attachment be issued. The advocate for Decree Holder is directed to submit the schedule of Property of Judgment Debtor. Put off to 14.05.2026 for further proceedings. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 3 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 12/2026 |
Mir Hassan & another VS Province of Sindh & Others | Muhammad Yaseen(ADVO-324-SBC-SGR) | Civil Appeal called. Appellant No.1 himself as well as attorney of appellant No.02 and his counsel are present. Respondent No.07 & 08 are called absent and their counsel Mr. Ashok Kumar advocate is called absent. Official respondents are called absent. Mr. Javed Ahmed DDA for official respondents is present. Respondent No.10 has been passed away Respondents No. No.6(a & B)and 9 to 14 and their counsel Mr. Parvaiz Ahmed Bugti are present. Notice not issued against respondent No.12 due to nonpayment of cost.Advocate for applellants submitted Condo-nation application. Order passed on it. Repeat notice against respondent No.12 by way of pasting on the outer door on the pointation appellant on costs. Put off to 12.05.2026, for service. |
|||
| 4 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 46/2026 |
Muhammad Qasim VS Province of Sindh & Others | Ghulam Rasool Samoo(ADVO-6853-SBC-HYD) | Matter called. Attorney of Appellant and his counsel are called absent. Process issued against Respondents. Process return served upon Respondents. NO:01 to 08 as per endorsement of bailiff. Respondents. NO:08 is present and submitted application for grant of time EX:05. Order passed on it. Put off to 12.05.2026 for appearance of Respondents. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 5 | S. Ex. (Summary Executions) 4/2024 |
Ali Muhammad VS Qadir Bux alias bhooro | Hasnain(ADVO-510-SBC-SGR) | Mir Mal (ADVO-4078-SBC-HYD) | Execution Application called. Plaintiff/Decree Holder and his counsel Mr. Muhammad Yaseen Khaskheli is present and submitted statement. Order passed on it. Defendant/J.D is called absent and his counsel Mr. Mir Mal Oad is present. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open Court. The instant Execution application is hereby allowed as prayed. The Defendant/Judgment Debtor is hereby directed to deposit the decretal amount of Rs. 15,83,400/- in compliance with the decree within the prescribed time. In case of failure to comply, writ of attachment of the movable and immovable property of the Judgment Debtor shall be issued in accordance with law. The learned advocate for the Decree Holder is directed to submit the schedule of property of the Judgment Debtor. Put up on 07.05.2026 for further proceedings. |
||
| 6 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 26/2025 |
Mst.Sehat @ Sohbat VS Shahzad Ali & Others | Tarique Mehboob(ADVO-165-SBC-SGR) | DDA(DDA-0001-GOV-SGR),Naeem Ahmed(ADVO-458-SBC-SGR) | Civil Appeal called. Attorney of Appellants and his counsel Mr. Tarique Mehboob advocate are present and submitted adjournment application EX:25.Order passed on it. Respondent No.04 himself as well as attorney of respondent No.6 and guardian ad-litem & next fried their real mother of respondent No.01 to 03 and their counsel Mr. Naeem Ahmed Rehmani advocate are present. Official respondent is called absent. The learned DDA for official respondent No.08 to 14 arecalled absent. Respondent No. 5 and 7 are called absent. Put off to 13.05.2026, for arguments. |
||
| 7 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 106/2025 |
Maroof VS Atta Muhammad & Others | Tahmasib Saeed() | DDA(DDA-0001-GOV-SGR),Zohaib Hassan(ADVO-3551-SBC-HYD) | Civil Appeal called. L.Rs of Appellants is called absent and their counsel Mr. Tahmasib Saeed advocate is also absent. Respondent No.1 and his Counsel are called absent. Order passed and announced in open Court. The instant Civil Appeal is hereby dismissed in non ???prosecution with no order as to costs. |
||
| 8 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 185/2025 |
Muhammad Usman VS Muhammad Yahya & Others | Parvez Ahmed(ADVO-676-SBC-SGR) | DDA(DDA-0001-GOV-SGR) | Civil Appeal called. Attorney of appellant and his Counsel are called absent. Official respondents are called absent. Mr. Javed Ahmed DDA for official respondents is present. Put off to 14.05.2026, for further arguments. |
||
| 9 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 195/2025 |
Gamoon & another VS Arbelo & Others | Rana Haseeb Sikander(ADVO-822-SBC-SGR),Syed Shabih Ul Hassnain (ADVO-763-SBC-SGR) | DDA(DDA-0001-GOV-SGR),Imran Khan(ADVO-759-SBC-SGR),Manzoor Ali(ADVO-385-SBC-SGR) | Civil Appeal called. Appellant No.1 himself as well as attorney of appellant No.02 and his counsel are present. Respondent No.1 is called absent, Respondent No.02 himself as well as attorney of respondents No.09 and their counsel Mr. Manzoor Ali Lashari advocate are present. Respondent No.8(a) himself as well as attorney of other L.Rs of Respondent No.8(c) and (e to G) are called absent and her counsel Mr. Imran Khan Khaskheli advocate is present. Official respondents are called absent. Mr. Javed Ahmed DDA for official respondents is present. The respondents No.8(D.H & I) are called absent and service against them has already been held good. Matter adjourned in the interest of justice. Put off to 13.05.2026, for further arguments. |
||
| 10 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 201/2025 |
Akbar Ali & Others VS Muhammad Akram & Others | S. Shafqat Ali Shah Masoomi(ADVO-328-SBC-SUK) | Bhagwan Das (ADVO-692-SBC-SGR),DDA(DDA-0001-GOV-SGR),Muhammad Awais Muneer(ADVO-52140-SBC-SGR) | Civil Appeal Called. Attorney of appellant and his counsel are Present his associate Mr. Syed Shabih ul Hassnain Kazmi advocate is present and submitted statement/Case laws. Order passed on it. L.Rs of respondent No.4(d) himself as well as attorney of respondent No.1,4(a,c,f,g to I) and next friend L.Rs of ( e) is called absent Mr. Bhagwan Das advocate for respondent No.1 ,4(d) and attorney of L.Rs of respondent No.4(a,c,e,f,g to I) is called absent. Official respondents are called absent. Mr. Javed Ahmed DDA for behalf of official respondents is present. Respondent No.2,3 and 4(b) & (j) is called absent and service against them has already been held good. Arguments heard on appellants side. Put off to 28.04.2026, for arguments on Respondents side. |
||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 23/2026 | Mst. Shamim VS Public at Large | Ayaz Ali (ADVO-731-SBC-SGR) | Awais Khan(ADVO-52620-SBC-SGR) | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-278 | Succession Application called. Applicant and her counsel are present. Opponent No.02 and her counsel are present. Detailed report along with its annexures is received from Chief Municipal Officer Municipal Committee Sanghar (15). Order on it. File. Advocate for opponent No. 2 filed statement along with its annexures (Ex.16). The advocate for applicant filed counter affidavit/objection to application U/O 32 Rule 3 CPC at (Ex. 17). Today matter is fixed for hearing of both applications U/O 32 Rule 3 CPC. The application U/O 32 Rule 3 CPC filed by applicant is hereby dismissed. Second application U/O 32 Rule 3 CPC filed by opponent No. 2 is hereby allowed. Put off to 11.05.2026, for further proceedings. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Succession Miscellaneous Applications | |||||||
| 2 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 113/2025 | Muhammad Anwar VS Public at Large | Muhammad Jahangir(ADVO-588-SBC-SGR) | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-372 | Succession Application called. Applicant and his counsel are present. Opponents No.2 to 5 are called absent without any intimation or application. The advocate for applicant has requested for adjournment, his request is allowed. Put 05.05.2026, for appearance of opponents No.2 to 5. |
||