| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 333/2026 | Khalil & another VS The State | Muhammad Sharif Misrani(ADVO-268-SBC-SGR) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-324,PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-Fi,PPC-337-H,PPC-427,PPC-504,PPC-506 | 24/2026 Jhol |
Criminal bail Application for accused Khalil and Ali Dino called. Advocate for applicant/accused and ADPP for the State are present. Complainant is called absent and his counsel is present. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open Court. The bail application is dismissed. |
| 2 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 359/2026 | Ghulam Hussain VS The State | Bhagwan Das (ADVO-692-SBC-SGR) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 29/2026 Jhol |
Criminal bail Application U/S 497 Cr.P.C for accused Ghulam Hussain called. Advocate for applicant/accused and ADPP for the State are present. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open Court. The post-arrest bail has been granted to applicant/accused subject to furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs:50,000/- (Fifty thousand) and PR bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of this Court. |
|
| 3 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 360/2026 | Ghulam Hussain VS The State | Bhagwan Das (ADVO-692-SBC-SGR) | PPC-324,PPC-34,PPC-353 | 28/2026 Jhol |
Criminal bail Application U/S 497 Cr.P.C for accused Ghulam Hussain called. Advocate for applicant/accused and ADPP for the State are present. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open Court. The post-arrest bail has been granted to applicant/accused subject to furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs:50,000/- (Fifty thousand) and PR bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of this Court. |
|
| 4 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 366/2026 | Parvez Akhtar VS The State | Qaim Ali(ADVO-442-SBC-SGR) | PPC-489-F | 88/2025 Sanghar |
Criminal bail Application U/S 497 Cr.P.C for accused Parvez Akhtar called. Advocate for applicant/accused and ADPP for the State are present. Notice issued to complainant and returned served. Complainant is present. Mr. Asif Ali Jat advocate appeared and filed Vakalatnama on behalf of complainant alongwith adjournment application. Order on it. Put off to 07.04.2026, for arguments. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 5 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 316/2026 | Kalo Khan & Others VS The State | Muhammad Sharif Misrani(ADVO-268-SBC-SGR) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-498 | 24/2026 Jhol |
A.B.A called. Applicants/accused are present on interim pre-arrest bail. Mr. Muhammad Sharif Advocate for applicants/accused is present. ADPP for the state is present. Complainant is called absent and his counsel is present. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open Court. The bail application is hereby dismissed. The ad-interim bail earlier granted to applicants/accused Kalo khan and others vide order dated 24.03.2026 is hereby recalled. Their bail bonds stand cancelled sureties discharged. |
| 6 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 329/2026 | Muzaffar Ali VS The State | Ashok Kumar (ADVO-791-SBC-SGR) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-498 | 11/2026 Chotiaryoon |
A.B.A called. Applicant/accused is present on interim pre-arrest bail. Mr. Ashok kumar Advocate for applicant/accused is present. ADPP for the state is present. Complainant is present. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open Court. Interim pre-arrest bail earlier granted to applicant/accused is hereby confirmed on same terms and conditions with directions to co-operate with investigation officer or to face the trial. Intimation be sent to concerned SHO/I.O for information and compliance |
| 7 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 335/2026 | Kaleemullah Brohi & another VS The State | Ayaz Ahmed (ADVO-583-SBC-SGR) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Sindh Prohibition of Intrest on Pvt Loan Act 2023-3-(1) | 11/2026 Shahpur Chakar |
A.B.A called. Applicants/accused are present on interim pre-arrest bail. Mr. Ayaz Ali Mari Advocate for applicants/accused is present. ADPP for the state is present. Notice issued to complainant and returned served. Complainant is called absent. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open Court. Interim pre-arrest bail earlier granted to applicant/accused is hereby confirmed on same terms and conditions with directions to co-operate with investigation officer or to face the trial. Intimation be sent to concerned SHO/I.O for information and compliance. |
| 8 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 344/2026 | Fahad & another VS The State | Ramz Ali (ADVO-1119-SBC-MKS) | Cr.PC-498 | 21/2026 Perumal |
A.B.A called. Applicants/accused Fahad Ali and Habibullah are present on interim pre-arrest bail. Mr. Ramz Ali advocate for applicants/accused is present. Mr. Abdul Ghani ADPP for the state is present. Notice to complainant and returned served. Complainant is present. Mr. Zafar Hayat Advocate has sent Vakalatnama on behalf of complainant alongwith adjournment application. Order on it. Police papers not received. Call Police papers. Put off to 10.04.2026, for confirmation or otherwise. Applicants/accused are directed to attend. |
|
| 9 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 345/2026 | Muhammad Raffaque & Others VS The State | Ayaz Ahmed (ADVO-583-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-498 | 20/2026 Perumal |
A.B.A called. Applicants/accused are present on interim pre-arrest bail. Mr. Ayaz Ahmed Khaskheli Advocate for applicants/accused is present. ADPP for the state is present. Notice issued to complainant and return served. Complainant is present. Mr. Bhagwan das advocate appeared and filed Vakalatnama on behalf of complainant. Order on it. File. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open Court. Interim pre-arrest bail earlier granted to applicant/accused is hereby confirmed on same terms and conditions with directions to co-operate with investigation officer or to face the trial. Intimation be sent to concerned SHO/I.O for information and compliance |
|
| 10 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 350/2026 | Niaz Hussain & Others VS The State | Riaz Ali(ADVO-457-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-498 | 25/2026 Jhol |
A.B.A called. Applicants/accused Niaz Hussain and Aamir are present on interim pre-arrest bail. Accused Haji Abdul Ghafoor is called absent Mr. Riaz Ali Shaikh advocate for applicants/accused is present. Mr. Abdul Ghani ADPP for the state is present. Notice issued to complainant and returned un-served. Advocate for applicant accused has filed an application for excuse of absence of accused Haji Abdul Ghafoor. Order on it. Absence condoned with warring. Repeat notice to complainant. Put off to 08.04.2026, for confirmation or otherwise. Applicants/accused are directed to attend. |
|
| 11 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 348/2026 | Muhammad Faizan VS The State | Awais Khan(ADVO-52620-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-498 | 71/2026 Sanghar |
.B.A called. Applicant/accused is present on interim pre-arrest bail. Mr. Awais Khan Advocate for applicant/accused and ADPP for the state are present. Complainant is present. Mr. Manzoor Ali Lashari advocate appeared and filed Vakalatnama on behalf of complainant. Order on it. File. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open Court. The bail application is dismissed and ad-interim bail earlier granted to applicant/accused vide order dated 30.03.2026 is hereby recalled. His bail bond stands cancelled and surety discharged. Let intimation be sent to SHO/ I.O concerned for information and compliance. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 12 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 588/2022 | The State VS Chakar Khan | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Mian Taj Muhammad(ADVO-1960-SBC-HYD),Mir Mal (ADVO-4078-SBC-HYD) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 39/2022 Perumal |
The case called. Accused Chakar Khan is present on bail. ADPP for state and Mr. Mir Mal Oad advocate for accused appointed on state expenses are present. Mr. Mian Taj Muhammad Keerio for accused is called absent, his associate Mr. Ramz Ali advocate is present. This case is off shoot of Sessions Case No. 247/2023 state VS Ali Raza @ Paro & Others U/S 302 PPC, Crime No. 36/2022 of PS Perumal., which case has been adjourned. Repeat process against the remaining Pws as ordered earlier and call case property. Put off to 09.04.2026 for evidence. Accused is directed to attend. |
| 13 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 587/2022 | The State VS Ali Raza @ Paro | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Mir Mal (ADVO-4078-SBC-HYD),Ramz Ali (ADVO-1119-SBC-MKS) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 38/2022 Perumal |
The case called. Accused Ali Raza @ Paro is present on bail. ADPP for state and Mr. Mir Mal Oad advocate for accused appointed on state expenses are present. Mr. Afzal Karim Virk defence counsel for accused is called absent. No PWS are present. This case is off shoot of Sessions Case No. 247/2023 state VS Ali Raza @ Paro & Others U/S 302 PPC, Crime No. 36/2022 of PS Perumal., which case has been adjourned. Court is lying vacant. Repeat process against the remaining PWs and call case property Put off to 09.04.2026 for evidence. Accused is directed to attend. |
| 14 | SC (Murder Trial) 247/2023 | The State VS Ali Raza @ Paro & others | Jamsheed(ADVO-595-SBC-SGR),Muhammad Yaseen(ADVO-324-SBC-SGR) | Afzal Karim(),Mir Mal (ADVO-4078-SBC-HYD) | PPC-114,PPC-302,PPC-337-H,PPC-34,PPC-504 | 36/2022 Perumal |
The case called. Accused Ali Raza @ Paroo, Chakar Khan and Ali Gohar are present on bail. Accused Pasand Ali is called absent, who has been declared as P.O. ADPP for state and Mr. Jamshed Laghari advocate for complainant are present. Learned defence counsel Mr. Mian Taj Muhammad Keerio for accused Chakar Khan is called absent, his associate Mr. Ramz Ali advocate is present and filed adjounmnet application. Order on it. Allowed as prayed Mr. Afzal Karim Virk defence counsel for accused Ali Raza and Ali Gohar is called absent. Accused Ali Gohar has filed adjourned application. Order on it. Allowed as prayed. This case is marked as an old one. The Hohourable, High Court of Sindh, Karachi as per letter received from Honourable, District & Sessions Judge, Sanghar vide No. DJ SGR: No. 14383/2025 Sanghar Dated 02.12.2025 ordered to decide such cases expeditiously by fixing twice a week. Complainant is present. No other PWS are present. Repeat process against the remaining PWs and call complete case property. Put off to 09.04.2026 for evidence. Accused are directed to attend. |
| 15 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 30/2026 | The State VS Ghulam Hussain @ Phinto | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-SGR) | Hussain Bux(ADVO-438-SBC-SGR) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 149/2025 Sinjhoro |
Case called. Accused is produced in custody from District Prison and correctional Facility Sanghar. ADPP for the State is present. Advocate for accused is present. Process issued against P.Ws and returned un-served. Order passed on thereon. Issue Show cause notice to SHO for non-compliance, through SSP Sanghar. No. PWs. are present. Repeat summons to Complainant and P.Ws. Call case property. Put off to 22.04.2026, for evidence. Accused is remanded back to custody. |
| 16 | PPC 63/2026 | The State VS Muzamil & another | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Shamsher Alam(ADVO-52143-SBC-SGR) | PPC-324,PPC-34,PPC-353 | 9/2026 Sinjhoro |
Case called. Accused Muzamil is present on bail. Accused Arshad @ Arsho shown in challan charge sheet as died. ADPP for the state is present. Mr. Shamsher Alam Chang advocate for accused is present. Process is returned un-served. No P.Ws are present. Issue show cause notice to SHO and I.O for non-compliance through SSP Sanghar. Repeat summons to Complainant and P.Ws. Call case property. Put off to 22.04.2026, for evidence. Accused is directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 491 | |||||||
| 17 | Application u/s 491 CrPc 97/2026 | Mst. Reshman Bibi VS SSP Sanghar & Others | Daleep Kumar(ADVO-569-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-491 | / |
Criminal Misc Application called. Applicant and her counsel are present. Detainee not produced. SIP Muhammad Yousif P.S Mangli is present Proposed accused 1 is present, while respondent No.02 is called absent and their counsel Mr. Syed Shahid Hussain Shah proposed accused are present. The advocate for applicant has filed withdrawal statement. Order passed on separate sheet.The instant application U/S 491 Cr.P.C is hereby dismissed as withdrawn. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 18 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 630/2026 | Muhammad Qayoom VS SSP Sanghar & Others | Alam Khan (ADVO-508-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I),Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Crl. Misc Application called. Applicant and his counsel are present. Reports are received from SHO PS Mangli and in-Charge S.P Complainant Cell Sanghar. Order on it. Proposed accused No.1,3 to 4 voluntarily appeared. Mr. Ghulam Murtaza advocate appeared and filed Vakalatnama on behalf of proposed accused Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open Court. The instant application disposed off accordingly. |
|
| 19 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 625/2026 | Behram Khan VS SSP Sanghar & Others | Faisal Khan(ADVO-538-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Criminal Miscellaneous Application called. Applicant and his counsel are called absent. Reports are received from SHO PS Mangli and In-charge S.P Complaint Cell Sanghar. Order on it. Put off to 07.04.2026, for hearing. |
|
| 20 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 615/2026 | Yasir Mehmood VS SSP Sanghar & Others | Gohar Ali Shah(ADVO-2949-SBC-KHP) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I),Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Crl. Misc Application called. Applicant and his counsel are present. Reports are received from SHO PS Mangli and in-Charge S.P Complainant Cell Sanghar. Order on it. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open Court. The instant application stands deposed of accordingly. |
|
| 21 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 597/2026 | Muhammad Abbas VS SSP Sanghar & Others | Ghulam Murtaza(ADVO-400-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Crl. Misc Application called. Applicant and his counsel are present. Reports are received from SHO PS Sinjhoro and in-Charge S.P Complainant Cell Sanghar. Order on it. Proposed accused No.1 to 4 voluntarily appeared. Mr. Tahmasib Saeed Jat advocate appeared and filed Vakalatnama on behalf of proposed accused Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open Court. The instant application, being devoid of merits, is dismissed. |
|
| 22 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 612/2026 | Muhammad Sadique VS SSP Sanghar & Others | Qaim Ali(ADVO-442-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Crl. Misc Application called. Applicant and his counsel are present. Proposed accused No.1 & 2 and their counsel are present. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open Court. The instant application stands dismissed. |
|
| 23 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 609/2026 | Ghulam Mustafa VS SSP Sanghar & Others | Rab Dino(ADVO-648-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I),Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Crl. Misc Application called. Applicant and his counsel are present. Reports are received from SHO PS Mangli and in-Charge S.P Complainant Cell Sanghar. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open Court. The instant application disposed off accordingly. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Supply of Copies | |||||||
| 24 | SC (Murder Trial) 258/2017 | The State VS Nadeem Ali & others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Jamsheed(ADVO-595-SBC-SGR) | PPC-302,PPC-337-A,PPC-337-F,PPC-504 | 110/2017 Shahdadpur |
Case called. Accused Qurban Ali is produced in custody from District Prison, and F.C Sanghar. While accused Muhammad Saleem already acquitted by this Court U/S: 265(i)-Cr.P.C. Accused Nadeem Ali already acquitted U/S: 345(6) by the Honourable High Court of Sindh, Mirpurkhas. Accused Rana waseem already declared as P.O. ADPP for the state, Mr. Imran Khan, advocate for accused Qurban Ali is present. Complainant is called absent. Mr. Rizwan Ahmed advocate for complainant is called absent. Copies as required U/S 265-C Cr.P.C are supplied to accused and such receipt is obtained from the R&R as??????????????????????????????????????????.Ex:27. Put off to; 09-04-2026, for Charge. Accused is remanded back to custody. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Misc. Applications | |||||||
| 25 | Application u/s 516-A CrPc 14/2026 | Abdul Nabi VS The State | Hussain Bux Mari(ADVO-483-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-516-A | 46/2026 Sanghar |
Criminal Misc Application called. Applicant and his counsel are present. ADPP for the state is present. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open Court. The Superdari of custody of motorcycle Honda CD-70 of red color, Model 2025, bearing Engine No.V121969, Chassis No. HB145434 is allowed and restored to applicant subject to furnishing solvent surety in sum of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty Thousand Rupees) and P.R Bond. The applicant is directed to transfer the above mentioned motorcycle in his name within six month from the date of passing of this order. The applicant is also directed to produce the said motorcycle before the Court as and when required by the Court till final disposal of case. |
|
| 26 | Application u/s 516-A CrPc 16/2026 | Sultan Saeed VS The State | Gohar Ali Shah(ADVO-2949-SBC-KHP) | Cr.PC-516 | 23/2026 Mangli |
Criminal Misc Application called. Applicant and absent and his counsel is present. ADPP for the state is present. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open Court. The application has been allowed. The Superdari/custody of Mobile Phone viz. Techno Spark Go-1, color glittery white, bearing IMEI1 No.350984221784151 and IMEI2 No.350984225992248 is allowed and restored to applicant subject to furnishing P.R Bond of Rs. 50,000/- (Fifty Thousand Rupees). The applicant is also directed to produce the said mobile phone before the Court as and when required by the Court till final disposal of case. The applicant submitted P.R bond, which is accepted by this Court. Issue letter to SHO Concerned for release the Motorcycle. |
|
| 27 | Application u/s 516-A CrPc 17/2026 | Ghufran Saeed VS The State | Gohar Ali Shah(ADVO-2949-SBC-KHP) | Cr.PC-516 | 23/2026 Mangli |
Criminal Misc Application called. Applicant and absent and his counsel is present. ADPP for the state is present. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open Court. The application has been allowed. The Superdari of custody of motorcycle Honda CD-70 of red color, Model 2018, bearing Registration No. SRB-3336, Engine No.8609610, Chassis No. JB-327111 is allowed and restored to applicant subject to furnishing P.R Bond of Rs. 50,000/- (Fifty Thousand Rupees). The applicant is also directed to produce the said motorcycle before the Court as and when required by the Court till final disposal of case. The applicant submitted P.R bond, which is accepted by this Court. Issue letter to SHO Concerned for release the Motorcycle. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION Compliance | |||||||
| 1 | Summary Suits 33/2025 |
Sawai Khan VS Ghulam Murtaza | Allah Bux Chang(ADVO-448-SBC-SGR) | Muhammad Zeeshan Rafique(ADVO-732-SBC-SGR) | Summary suit called. Attorney of Plaintiff and his counsel are present. Defendant is called absent and his counsel is present. today matter is fixed for compliance U/O 10 Rule 2 and arguments on application U/O VII Rue 11 CPC. Arguments heard on application U/O VII Rule 11 CPC. The instant application is hereby dismissed. Order passed on order sheet. but the parties raised their allegations against each other as they have already denied. Compliance U/ O 10 Rule 2 CPC stands failed. The learned counsels for both the parties are directed to file/ submit draft issues on the next date of hearing. Put off to 13.04.2026, for draft issues. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 2 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 205/2025 |
Sarfraz & another VS Ghazi Khan & Others | Rab Dino(ADVO-648-SBC-SGR) | Jamsheed(ADVO-595-SBC-SGR),Muhammad Faizan(ADVO-6621-SBC-HYD) | Civil Appeal called. Appellants No.1 & 2 and their counsel are present. Respondent No.1 and his counsel Mr. Jamshed Laghari advocate are present. Respondent No.23 and attorney of respondent No.24 are and their Counsel Mr. Muhammad Faizan are present. Respondent No. 18 and 20 is called absent. on the last date of hearing Attorney of respondent No.19 namely Rasool Bux S/o Esso Khan was present, but today he is called absent. Respondents No.4 and 13 are called absent. One son of respondent No.05 Ghulam Abbas is called absent. The learned counsel for appellant has not submitted list of L.Rs of respondents No.05. He is directed to submit the list of L.Rs of respondent No. 05. Notice issued against respondents No. 3,6 and 11 to 18, 21 and 22 and same is returned un-served, as per endorsement of bailiff of this Court. Repeat notice against respondents No.3, 6 and 11 to 18, 21 and 22 through bailiff by way of pasting on the pointation of appellant, Register post A/D and TCS on costs. Put off to 24.04.2026, for service upon respondents, |
||
| 3 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 36/2026 |
Illahi Bux & another VS Allah Ditta & Others | Jamsheed(ADVO-595-SBC-SGR) | Civil Appeal called. Appellant and his counsel are present. Notice issued against respondents and returned served upon respondent No.1 through his son. While notice returned un-served upon respondent No.2 & 3. Respondent No.1 is called absent. Mr. Mukhtiarkar Ahmed Bhatti advocate appeared and filed Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent No.1 at (Ex.05). Order on it. File. Repeat notice against respondent No.2 & 3 on costs. Put off to 24.04.2026, for service upon respondent No.2 & 3. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 4 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 74/2025 |
Muhammad Habib VS Muhammad Rafique & another | Muhammad Haroon Shaikh(ADVO-1859-SBC-SUK) | DDA(DDA-0001-GOV-SGR),Waseem Akhtar(ADVO-636-SBC-SGR) | Civil Appeal Called. Appellant and his Counsel called are repeatedly called absent without any intimation or application. Respondent No.1 is called absent and his counsel Mr. Rao Waseem Akhtar advocate is present. Official respondent is called absent. Mr. Javed Ahmed DDA for official respondent is present. Order passed and announced in open Court. The Civil Appeal in hand stands dismissed in non-prosecution. Copy of order alongwith original R&PS be sent to concerned court for information and compliance. |
||
| 5 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 73/2025 |
Muhammad Habib VS Kamaluddin Since dead through his LRs & Others | Muhammad Haroon Shaikh(ADVO-1859-SBC-SUK) | Atta Muhammad(ADVO-320-SBC-SGR),Muhammad Younis(ADVO-733-SBC-SGR),Sumaira(ADVO-814-SBC-SGR) | Civil Appeal Called. Appellant and his counsel are repeatedly called absent without any intimation or application. Official respondents are called absent. Mr. Javed Ahmed DDA for official respondent is present. LRs of respondent No. 1(i) and L.Rs of Respondent No.2 (iii himself as well as attorney of L.Rs No.1 & 11 are called absent and their Counsel Mr. Atta Muhammad Shaikh advocate is also present. Respondent No.1 (ii) and 2(iii) is called absent and their counsel Mr. Sumaira Abdullah advocate is present. L.Rs of Respondent No.2(ii) is called absent and service against has already been held good. Order passed and announced in open Court. The Civil Appeal in hand stands dismissed in non-prosecution. Copy of order alongwith original R&PS be sent to concerned court for information and compliance. |
||
| 6 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 79/2025 |
Shahid Khan VS Province of Sindh through Member Board of Revenue Shahbaz Building Hyderabad & Others | Jaleel Ahmed Memon(ADVO-583-SBC-NWB) | Ashok Kumar (ADVO-791-SBC-SGR),DDA(DDA-0001-GOV-SGR),Muhammad Ayoub Magsi(ADVO-551-SBC-SGR) | Civil Appeal called. Attorney of appellant is called absent and his counsel Mr. Jaleel Ahmed Memon, is called absent, his junior is present. Respondents No.2 and his counsel Mr. Muhammad Ayoub Magsi advocate are called absent. Respondent 3(ii) himself as well as attorney of L.Rs of respondents No.3(i) and 4,5,6 & 7 is called absent and his counsel Mr. Ahsok Kumar is present. Official respondents are called absent. Mr. Javed Ahmed DDA for official respondents is present. The junior advocate for appellant has filed adjournment application at (Ex.22). Order on it. Allowed as prayed Put off to 21.04.2026, for arguments. |
||
| 7 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 161/2025 |
Imtiaz Ahmed Arain VS Aijaz Ahmed & Others | Muhammad Ali Shaikh(ADVO-158-SBC-SGR) | DDA(DDA-0001-GOV-SGR),Insaf Ali(ADVO-628-SBC-SGR) | Civil Appeal called. Attorney of Appellants is called absent and his counsel is counsel is present. Respondent No.1 and his Counsel are present. Official respondents are called absent. DDA is present. The advocate for appellant has filed adjournment application at (Ex.13). Order on it. Put off to 20.04.2026, for arguments. |
||
| 8 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 166/2025 |
Aijaz Ahmed VS Imtiaz Ahmed Arain & Others | Insaf Ali(ADVO-628-SBC-SGR) | DDA(DDA-0001-GOV-SGR),Muhammad Ali Shaikh(ADVO-158-SBC-SGR) | Civil Appeal called. Appellant while his counsel is are present. Attorney of Respondent No.1 is called absent and his counsel Mr. Muhammad Ali Sheikh advocate is present. Official respondent are called absent. DDA is present. The advocate for respondent No.1 has filed adornment application at (Ex.10). Order on it. Allowed as prayed. Put off to 20.04.2026, for arguments. |
||
| 9 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 183/2025 |
M/S Goklani Brothers Sanghar City Filling & CNG Station VS Federation of Pakistan Through Ministry of energy Petroleum Division & Others | Allah Bux Chang(ADVO-448-SBC-SGR),Nand Kumar(ADVO-232-SBC-SGR) | Bashir Ahmed Sethar(ADVO-3099-SBC-HYD),DDA(DDA-0001-GOV-SGR),Muhammad Ali(ADVO-2056-SBC-HYD) | Civil Appeal Called. Attorney of appellant is called absent and his counsel is present. Respondent No.06 and his counsel Mr. Shaikh Naveed Anwar are called absent. Respondent No.05 and his counsel Mr. Hemandas S.Sanghani advocate are called absent, his associate Mr. Ashok Kumar Gullani advocate is present. Respondent No.9 & 10 are called absent. Mr. JAved Ahmed DDA for official respondents is present. Respondent No.2,3,& 4 and their counsel Mr. Muhammad Ali Shaikh are called absent. Respondents No.1, 7 & 8 are called absent and service against them held good. The advocate to appellant has filed adjournment application at (Ex.17). Order on it. Allowed as prayed. Put off to 20.04.2026, for arguments. |
||
| 10 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 28/2026 |
Muhammad Hanif & Others VS Muhammad Munsab & Others | Gaji Khan(ADVO-435-SBC-SGR) | DDA(DDA-0001-GOV-SGR),Muhammad Babar(ADVO-450-SBC-SGR) | Civil Appeal called. Appellant No.3 himself as well as attorney of other appellants is called absent and his counsel is present. Respondent No.1 is present. Mr. Muhammad Babar Sidhu advocate for respondent No.1 is present and filed counter affidavit/objections on behalf of respondent No.1 at (Ex.07). Order on it. Copy to other side. Copy is received other side. Official respondents is called absent. DDA is present. R&Ps is received. Partly arguments heard. Put off to 22.04.2026, for further arguments. |
||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | F.A. (Family Appeals) 13/2026 | Syed Ahmed Ali Shah VS Mst. Manzooran | Khadim Hussain(ADVO-2399-SBC-KHP) | Family Appeal-Section 14 of Family Court Act | Family Appeal called. Appellant is called absent and his counsel is present. Notice issued against respondent and returned duly served upon him, as per endorsement of bailiff. Respondent is called absent. Repeat notice against respondent by way of pasting on the outer door in presence of two witnesses on costs. Put off to 27.04.2026, for service |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Succession Miscellaneous Applications | |||||||
| 2 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 7/2026 | Sanaullah VS Public at Large | Muhammad Ashraf Ali (ADVO-519-SBC-SGR) | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-372 | Succession Application called. Applicant is present and his counsel are present. Heard. Order passed and announced in open Court. Order passed on application U/O 32 Rule 3 CPC. The application in hand stands allowed and the opponent No.03 is hereby appointed as guardian ad-litem of the minor opponent Nos 7 being their real sister as guardian ad-litem. Order passed and announced in open Court. Succession Application is allowed subject to execute of PR Bond in the total amount. However, in order to avoid any complication and to safeguard the interest of parties, Accountant of Honourable District Court Sanghar is appointed as Commissioner to collect amount from concerned bank as mentioned in para No.5 (supra),and disburse the same amongst applicant and opponent No. 2 to 6 as per their shares according to Muhammaden Law under proper receipt. So far share of opponent Nos. 07 concerned, as he is minors, as such, in order to safeguard their interests, Accountant of Honourable District Court Sanghar is further directed to invest the shares of minor opponent No.7 in profitable scheme of National Savings Center, Sanghar till they attain the age of majority or as per order the competent court of law. Advocate for applicant is directed to produce the share list of legal heirs within one week. Application stands disposed of in above terms. Copy of this order be sent to Accountant District Court, Sanghar for information and compliance. |
||