| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | PPC 512/2024 | The State VS Hakim & others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Bhagwan Das (ADVO-692-SBC-SGR),Hussain Bux(ADVO-438-SBC-SGR) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-224,PPC-225,PPC-324,PPC-353 | 43/2024 Perumal |
Case called. Accused Ali Asghar produced in custody from suptt: District Prison & correctional facility, Sanghar. Accused Hakim, Ali Gul, Ali Bux, Rajab Ali, Mst. Rehana, and Irshad Ali are present on bail. Accused Shamshad Ali @ Dawood has been passed away and proceedings against him is abated. Accused Ghulam Murtaza, Hafeez, Ali Ahmed, Saifal, Imam Bux @ Millo, Razia, Madad, Hakeeman @ Shareefan. Bai Sadori, and Nayab they have already been declared as P.O. ADPP for the state is present. Mr. Hussain Bux Chang advocate for accused Ali Asghar, Ali Gul, and Hakim Ali is present. Mr. Prem Chand advocate for accused Ali Bux, Rehana and Rajab is present. Mr. Ghulam Hussain Baloch advocate for accused Irshad is present. Process is returned served/un-served. P.W. SIP Muhammad Azam and P.C Moula Bux are present. The ADPP for the state has filed statement for give-up at (Ex.31). Order on it. Kept on record. The learned counsel for accused Irshad Ali has filed an application U/S 265-K Cr.P.C at (Ex.32). Order on it. Notice to DDA. The learned Counsel for accused Ali Asghar, Ali Gul and Hakim has filed an application U/S 265-K Cr.P.C at (Ex.33). Order on it. Notice to ADPP. The leanred counsel for accused Rajab Ali, Ali Bux and Mst. Rehana has filed an application U/S 265-K Cr.P.C at (Ex.34). Order on it. Notice to ADPP. Heard arguments. Order passed and announced in open Court at (Ex.35). The accused Ali Asghar, Hakim, Ali Gul, Ali Bux, Rajab Ali, Mst. Rehana, and Irshad Ali are acquitted U/S 265-K Cr.P.C, They are present on bail, their bail bonds stands cancelled and sureties discharged. Accused Ali Asghar is remanded back to custody with direction to release him forthwith in this case, if he is not required in any other custody case. Office is directed to issue release writ of accused Ali Asghar to concerned jail authority. The case against accused Ghulam Murtaza, Hafeez, Ali Ahmed, Saifal, Imam Bux @ Millo, Razia, Madad, Hakeeman @ Shareefan, Bai Sadori, and Nayab be kept on dormant file till their arrest. Office is directed to Issue Life time NBWs against them to concerned P.S. |
| 2 | PPC 361/2025 | The State VS Ali Gul & others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Muhammad Jahangir(ADVO-588-SBC-SGR) | PPC-324,PPC-34,PPC-353 | 41/2025 Perumal |
Case called. Accused Ali Gul is present on bail. Accused Mehboob @ Muhib, Asghar, Rajab @ Mitho and Wahab they have been declared as Proclaimed offenders. Mr. ADPP for the state is present. Mr. Muhammad Jahangir Qureshi advocate Ali Gul is present. Process return un-served. No PWs are present. Repeat summons to complainant and R/P.Ws. Call case property. Put off to 04.03.2026, for evidence. Present accused is directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 491 | |||||||
| 3 | Application u/s 491 CrPc 52/2026 | Gul Muhammad VS SSP Sanghar & Others | Sajad Hassan(ADVO-779-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-491 | / |
Criminal Misc Application called. Applicant and his counsel are present. Process issued same is returned served. SHO of PS Sinjhoro submitted repeat alongwith memo, before this Court through Inspector Mian Dad Rajar, alleged detainee not produced the by police. Respondent No.04 voluntarily appeared. Mr. Suneel Kumar advocate has appeared and filed Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent No.04. Order on it. File. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open Court. The application in hand stands disposed of. However, the applicant is directed to approach the Court of Guardian and Wards Act having jurisdiction for custody of his child/detainee, if he desire so. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 4 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 304/2026 | Shabbir Ahmed VS SSP Sanghar & Others | Sarfaraz Ahmed(ADVO-485-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Crl. Misc Application called. Applicant and his counsel are present. Reports are received from SHO PS Mangli and In-charge SP complaint cell Sanghar. Order on it. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open Court. The instant application stands dismissed accordingly. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 5 | Forest/Wild Life Acts 520/2025 | The State VS Uris & Others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Sindh Wildlife Preservation Conservation Act-2020-21,Sindh Wildlife Preservation Conservation Act-2020-9 (1) | 32/2025 Wild Life Sanghar |
Case called. All accused are called absent. As per the challan/charge sheet, all the accused are shown as absconders. ASI Ameer Bux of PS Khipro is present on behalf of SHO PS Khipro and submit report and B.W duly executed upon all accused. Order passed on it. Repeat the same. Repeat BWs against all accused persons through SHO P.S Khipro. Put off to 03.03.2026, for execution of B.Ws. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Further Proceedings | |||||||
| 1 | S. Ex. (Summary Executions) 1/2024 |
Zahid Hussain VS Nabeel Akhtar | Suneel(ADVO-346-SBC-SGR),Waqar Hussain(ADVO-468-SBC-SGR) | Waseem Akhtar(ADVO-636-SBC-SGR) | Execution application called for compliance called. The plaintiff/D.H and his counsel are present. The defendant/J.D. and his counsel, Mr. Muhammad Younas is present. Surety Muhammad Arshad is present. The applicant/D.H has filed an application for taking legal action against the judgment Debtor & Surety by issuing NBW alongwith affidavit at (Ex.12 and Ex.13). Order on it. Notice to other side. Copy is received other side. Put off to 19.02.2026, for further proceedings |
||
| 2 | S. Ex. (Summary Executions) 1/2025 |
Muhammad Ayaz through his attorney Atta Muhammad VS Javed Baig | Muhammad Younis(ADVO-733-SBC-SGR) | Execution Application called. Attorney Plaintiff/Decree Holder is present and his counsel is called absent. Defendant/J.D is called absent. Process warrant of arrest issued against defendant through SSP east, but not returned served or un-served. Repeat Warrant of arrest issued against defendant/J.D. Put off to 03.03.2026, for execution of arrest of warrant. |
|||
| 3 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 202/2025 |
Muhammad Ilyas VS Muhammad Aslam & Others | Muhammad Babar(ADVO-450-SBC-SGR) | Civil Appeal called. Appellant is called absent, while his counsel is present. The respondent No. 1 is present. Official respondents are called absent. The learned DDA for official respondents is present. Mr. Muhammad Tahir Sidhu advocate has sent filed Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent No.01 alongwith adjournment application at (Ex.05 and Ex.06).Order passed thereon. Call R&PS from trial Court. Put off to 05.03.2026, for arguments. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 4 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 212/2025 |
Khuda Bux & Others VS Muhammad Yousif & Others | Jamsheed(ADVO-595-SBC-SGR) | Civil Appeal called. Appellant No.1 himself as well as Attorney of other appellants and his counsel are present. Respondent No.1 has been passed away. Attorney of respondent No.1 is present. Notice issued against respondent No.2 & 3 through court and TCS and returned un-served. Mr. Insaf Ali Abro advocate has appeared and filed Undertaking that he will file Vakalatnama on behalf of attorney of Private respondents on next date of hearing at (Ex.07). Order on it. File. Official respondents are called absent. Mr. Waseem Ahmed DDA is present and filed memo of appearance on behalf of official respondents at (Ex.08). Order on it. File. The advocate for appellant has filed an application U/S XXII Rule 4 CPC alongwith affidavit for join the legal heirs of respondents No.1 at (Ex.09 and Ex.10). Order on it. Notice to respondents. He has also filed an application U/O XXXII Rule 3 CPC alongwith affidavit at (Ex.11 and Ex.12). Order on it. Notice to respondents. Copy received other side. The advocate for appellants has filed an application U/O 5 Rule 20 CPC for substitute service by of publication any newspapers alongwith affidavit at (Ex.13 and Ex.14).Order passed on separate sheet. The instant application for substitute service is hereby allowed accordingly. Let the notice against respondent No.2 & 3 be issued through publication in Newspapers daily Kawish Hyderabad. Put off to 07.03.2026, for service through publication upon respondents No.2 & 3/ objection on application U/O XXII Rule 4 CPC and application U/S XXXII Rule 3 CPC. |
|||
| 5 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 5/2026 |
Khair Muhammad VS Abdul Latif Shah & Others | Insaf Ali(ADVO-628-SBC-SGR) | Civil Appeal Called. Appellant and his counsel are present. Official respondents are called absent. Mr. Waseem Ahmed DDA for official respondents is present. Notice respondent No. 1 to 3 and returned served upon respondent No.1 & 2, while notice respondent No.03 returned un-served, but they are called absent. The advocate for appellants has filed an application U/O 5 Rule 20 CPC read with section 151 CPC for substitute service by of publication any newspapers alongwith affidavit at (Ex.06 and Ex.07). Order passed on separate sheet. The instant application for substitute service is hereby allowed accordingly. Let the notice against respondent No.1 to 3 be issued through publication in Newspapers daily Kawish Hyderabad and as well as by way of pasting on the pointation of appellant on costs as well as Put off to 28.02.2026, for service through publication upon respondents No.1 to 3.Late diary. 18.02.2026. The respondents No.2 & 3 are present. Mr.Zeeshan advocate has appeared and filed Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent No.2 & 3 at (Ex.08). Order on it. File. Matter is already fixed on 28.02.2026. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 6 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 73/2011 |
Province of Sindh and others VS Abdul Haq | DDA(DDA-0001-GOV-SGR) | Jamsheed(ADVO-595-SBC-SGR) | Civil Appeal is called. The appellants are absent, while the learned DDA representing the appellants is present. The respondent is called absnet and his Counsel Mr. Jamshed Leghari is present. No Officials witnesses are Present. DDA has filed adjournment application on ground that the clerk of Mukhtiarkar state intimate through mobile phone that post of Mukhtiarkar Estate is vacant at (Ex.25). Order on it. The Letter No.DC/SGR/ 344/2026,Sanghar dated 18.02.2026, sent by the Additional Deputy Commissioner-I, Sanghar, regarding the post Mukhtiarkar State Sanghar is lying vacant at (Ex.26). Order on it. File. Put off to 05.03.2026, for evidence. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Hearing of Applications | |||||||
| 7 | Summary Suits 6/2026 |
Arsalan Ahmed VS Furqan Ali | Atta Muhammad(ADVO-320-SBC-SGR) | Summary suit Called. Plaintiff and his counsel are called absent. Defendant and his Counsel Mr. Rizwan Jat are called absent. Order passed on application U/O XXXVII Rule 3 CPC. The application U/O: XXXVII Rule 3 CPC, has been allowed but conditionally subject to furnishing surety/security by defendant in the equal amount till next date of hearing.put off to 03.03.2026 for compliance and written statement and further proceedings. The application in hand stands disposed of accordingly. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 8 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 123/2024 |
Haji Mumtaz & Others VS Mst. Shagufta & Others | Muhammad Yaseen(ADVO-324-SBC-SGR) | Abdul Aziz(ADVO-4826-SBC-HYD),Aijaz Ali(ADVO-656-SBC-SGR) | Civil Appeal called. Appellant No.2 himself as well as attorney of other appellants and his counsel are called absent, his associate Mr. Zeeshan advocate is present. Respondent No.01 and her counsel Mr. Abdul Aziz are present. Respondent No.02 and his counsel Mr. Aijaz Sinjrani are called absent. Mr. Waseem Ahmed DDA for official respondents is present. The junior advocate for appellant has filed adjournment application at (Ex.30). Order on it. Allowed as last chance. Put off to 05.03.2026, for arguments main appeal/Application U/O 41 Rule 27 R/W 151 C.P.C. |
||
| 9 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 255/2024 |
Muhammad Ali VS Arshad Ali Khan & Others | Naseer Ahmed(ADVO-701-SBC-SGR) | DDA(DDA-0001-GOV-SGR),Suneel(ADVO-346-SBC-SGR) | Civil Appeal called. L.Rs of Appellant Ali Muhammad himself as well as attorney other appellants and his counsel Mr. Naseer Ahmed are present. Respondent No.1 is called absent and his Counsel Mr. Suneel Kumar advocate is present. Official respondents are called absent. Mr. Waseem Ahmed DDA for official respondents is present. Arguments heard by the learned counsel for respondent No.01. The advocate for appellant has filed adjournment application at (Ex.24). Order on it. Allowed as last chance. Put off to 27.02.2026, for arguments of appellant side. |
||
| 10 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 106/2025 |
Maroof VS Atta Muhammad & Others | Tahmasib Saeed() | DDA(DDA-0001-GOV-SGR),Zohaib Hassan(ADVO-3551-SBC-HYD) | Civil Appeal called. L.Rs of Appellants and their counsel Mr. Tahmasib Saeed advocate are called absent, his junior is present. Respondent No.1 called absent and his Counsel is present. Arguments heard by the learned counsel for respondent No.1 and he also submitted written arguments at (Ex.17). Order on it. File. Official respondent is called absent. Mr. Waseem Ahmed DDA for official respondent is present. The Junior advocate for appellant has filed adjournment application at (Ex.18). Order on it. Allowed as prayed. Put off to 03.03.2026, for arguments appellant side. |
||
| 11 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 127/2025 |
Hamid Ali & Others VS Muhammad Arif Since dead through his LRs & Others, | Muhammad Yaseen(ADVO-324-SBC-SGR) | DDA(DDA-0001-GOV-SGR),Sher Ali(ADVO-372-SBC-SGR) | Civil Appeal called. Appellant No.(a) himself as well as attorney of appellants is called absent and Appellant No. 10 is present and their Counsel is called absent, his associate Mr.Zeeshan advocate is present. Respondent No.3 himself as well as attorney of respondents No.1, 2 and 4 to 13 is present and his counsel Mr. Sher Ali advocate is called absent. Official respondents are called absent. Mr. Waseem Ahmed DDA for official respondents is present. The junior advocate for appellant has filed adjournment application at (Ex.17). Order on it. Allowed as prayed. The attorney for private respondents has filed adjournment application at (Ex.18). Order on it. Allowed as prayed. Put off to 07.03.2026, for arguments. |
||
| 12 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 128/2025 |
Zulfiqar Ali Since dead through his LRs & Others VS Muhammad Arif Since dead through his LRs & Others | Muhammad Yaseen(ADVO-324-SBC-SGR) | DDA(DDA-0001-GOV-SGR),Sher Ali(ADVO-372-SBC-SGR) | Civil Appeal called. Appellants (a) himself as well as attorney of other appellants and his Counsel are called absent, his associate Mr.Zeeshan advocate is present. Respondent No.3 himself as well as attorney of respondents No.1, 2 and 4 to 12 and is present his counsel Mr. Sher Ali advocate is called absent. Official respondents are called absent. Mr. Waseem Ahmed DDA for official respondents is present. The Attorney for private respondents has filed adjournment application at (Ex.17). Order on it. Allowed as prayed. The junior advocate for appellant has filed adjournment application at (Ex.18). Order on it. Put off to 07.03.2026, for arguments. |
||
| 13 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 169/2025 |
Muhammad Aqil VS Province of Sindh through Secretary Revenue Department & Others | Jamsheed(ADVO-595-SBC-SGR) | DDA(DDA-0001-GOV-SGR),Sintosh Kumar(ADVO-429-SBC-MKS) | Civil Appeal called. Appellant and his Counsel are present. Respondent No.25 is present, while respondent No.15 to 24,& 27 are called absent. Mr. Santosh Kumar advocate for Respondents No.15 to 27 is called absent, his junior is present. Official respondents are called absent. Mr. Waseem Ahmed DDA for official respondents is present. Respondent 28 is called absent and service against him has already been held good. The junior advocate for appellant has filed adjournment application at (Ex.25). Order on it. Allowed absolutely last and final chance. Put off to 06.03.2026 for arguments. |
||
| 14 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 175/2025 |
Dhiyangir VS Province of Sindh & Others | Sintosh Kumar(ADVO-429-SBC-MKS) | DDA(DDA-0001-GOV-SGR),Jamsheed(ADVO-595-SBC-SGR) | Civil Appeal called. Appellant and his Counsel are present. Respondent No.25 is present, while respondent No.15 to 24,& 27 are called absent. Mr. Santosh Kumar advocate for Respondents No.15 to 27 is called absent, his junior is present. Official respondents are called absent. Mr. Waseem Ahmed DDA for official respondents is present. Respondent 28 is called absent and service against him has already been held good. The junior advocate for appellant has filed adjournment application at (Ex.25). Order on it. Allowed absolutely last and final chance. Put off to 06.03.2026 for arguments. |
||
| 15 | C.Rev. (Civil Revisions) 52/2025 |
Masood Aslam VS Imam Bux & Others | Tarique Mehboob(ADVO-165-SBC-SGR) | Bhagwan Das (ADVO-692-SBC-SGR),DDA(DDA-0001-GOV-SGR) | Civil Revision Application called. Attorney of applicant his counsel are present. Official respondents are called absent. Mr. Waseem Ahmed DDA for official respondents is absent. Respondent No.1 and his counsel Mr. Bhagwan Das advocate are called absent, his junior is present and filed adjournment application at (Ex.10). Order on it. Allowed as prayed. Put off to 04.03.2026, for arguments. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Judgment | |||||||
| 16 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 132/2025 |
Muhammad Ali VS Akbar & Others | Suneel(ADVO-346-SBC-SGR) | Bhagwan Das (ADVO-692-SBC-SGR),DDA(DDA-0001-GOV-SGR) | |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 17 | Summary Suits 31/2024 |
Ghulam Sarwar VS Abdul Hameed | Sumaira(ADVO-814-SBC-SGR) | Kaleem Ullah (ADVO-669-SBC-SGR) | Summary suit Called. Plaintiff and his Counsel are present. Defendant is present and his Counsel is called absent. The advocate for plaintiff has filed adjournment application at (Ex.44). Order on it. Allowed in the interest of justice. Put off to 25.02.2026, for defendant side evidence/ objection on application U/S 151 CPC. |
||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 1 | F.A. (Family Appeals) 52/2025 | Rattan Kumar VS Sht. Maya & another | Anwar Shahzad(ADVO-367-SBC-SGR) | Housh Muhammad Mangi() | Family Appeal-Section 14 of Family Court Act | ||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Succession Miscellaneous Applications | |||||||
| 2 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 2/2026 | Mst. Rajba VS Public at Large | Gohar Ali Shah(ADVO-2949-SBC-KHP) | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-278 | |||