| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | PPC 656/2024 | The state VS Altaf Hussain & others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR),Zafar Hayat(ADVO-404-SBC-SGR) | Ashok Kumar (ADVO-791-SBC-SGR),Suneel(ADVO-346-SBC-SGR) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-324,PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-F(vi),PPC-337-Fv,PPC-337-L,PPC-506 | 57/2024 Jhol |
Case called. Accused Altaf Hussain, Mehtab Hussain, Ameer Ali, Wali Muhammad, Khair Muhammad, Habibullah, Hussain @ Papu and Sadique are present on bail. ADPP for the state is present. Mr. Sajjad Ali advocate for accused Altaf Hussain and Mehtab Hussain is present. Mr. Suneel Kumar advocate for accused Ameer Ali, Wali Muhammad and Khair Muhammad is called absent, his junior is present. Mr. Adil Shahzad advocate for accused Muhammad Sadique, Hussain Ali and Habibullah is called absent. Complainant is present, while Mr. Muhammad Sharif Misrani advocate for complainant called absent, his associate Mr. Abid Ali Qureshi advocate is present. Process is returned served. P.Ws. Shafi Muhammad, Rehan and Imran are present. The junior Advocate for accused Ameer Ali, Wali Muhammad and Khair Muhammad filed adjournment application. Order on it. Adjourned in the interest of justice. Repeat summons to R/P.Ws. Call case property. Case is adjourned by consent. Put off to 14.03.2026, for evidence. Present accused are directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 2 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 148/2026 | Mohsin Raza VS The State | Muhammad Yaseen(ADVO-324-SBC-SGR) | PPC-109,PPC-34,PPC-406,PPC-419,PPC-420,PPC-468,PPC-471 | / |
Criminal bail Application called. Advocate for applicant/accused is present and Special prosecutor is called absent. Order passed and announced in open Court. The post arrest bail has been granted to applicant/accused subject to furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs:200,000/-(Two Lac Rupees) each and P.R bonds in the like amount to the satisfaction of this Court. |
|
| 3 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 147/2026 | Abdul Qadeer VS The State | Muhammad Yaseen(ADVO-324-SBC-SGR) | PPC-109,PPC-34,PPC-406,PPC-419,PPC-420,PPC-468,PPC-471 | / |
Criminal bail Application called. Advocate for applicant/accused is present and Special prosecutor is called absent. Order passed and announced in open Court. The post arrest bail has been granted to applicant/accused subject to furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs:200,000/-(Two Lac Rupees) each and P.R bonds in the like amount to the satisfaction of this Court. |
|
| 4 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 179/2026 | Rashid Mehmood VS The State | Muhammad Babar(ADVO-450-SBC-SGR) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR),Mir Mal (ADVO-4078-SBC-HYD) | PPC-489-F | 21/2026 Sanghar |
Criminal bail Application called. Advocate for applicant/accused and ADPP for the state are present. Complainant is called absent and his Counsel Mr. Mir Mal oad present. The advocate for complainant has filed statement alongwith case law. Order on it. File. Final arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open Court. Consequently, the bail has been granted to applicant/accused, subject to providing a solvent surety in sum of in sum of equivalent amount of disputed cheque, along with a P.R. bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court. However, it is important to note that these observations are tentative and shall not influence the case during the trial. Copy of this order be sent to concerned trial Court for information and compliance. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 5 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 171/2026 | Zulfiqar Ali @ Zulfi & Others VS The State | Bhagwan Das (ADVO-692-SBC-SGR) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-498 | 79/2025 Jhol |
ABA called. Accused Zulfiqar Ali @ Zulfi, Imtaz Ali and Aijaz Ali are present on interim bail. Mr. Bhagwan Das advocate for applicants/accused and Mr. Jamaluddin Baladi ADPP for the state are present. Process returned served upon complainant. Complainant Alam Chan is present. Mr. Asad Jahangeer Arain advocate appeared and filed his vakalatnama on behalf of complainant. Order on it. File. He has also filed adjournment application. Order on it. Allowed. Put off to 24.02.2026, for confirmation or otherwise. Applicants/accused are directed to attend. |
| 6 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 172/2026 | Muhammad Khan VS The State | Rizwan Ali(ADVO-428-SBC-SGR) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-498 | 154/2025 Sinjhoro |
ABA called. Applicant/accused is present on interim pre-arrest bail. Mr. Rizwan Ali advocate for applicant/accused ADPP for the state also present. Process returned served upon complainant. Complainant is absent. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open Court. Order passed and announced in open Court. The interim pre-arrest bail earlier granted to applicant accused is hereby confirmed on same terms and conditions with directions to co-operate with Investigation officer to face the trial. Intimation be sent to concerned SHO/I.O for information and compliance. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 7 | PPC 74/2025 | The State VS Nabi Dad and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Abdul Jabbar Panhwar(),Ghulam Hussain(ADVO-403-SBC-SGR),Parvez Ahmed(ADVO-676-SBC-SGR),Zafar Hayat(ADVO-404-SBC-SGR) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-324,PPC-353 | 267/2024 Sanghar |
Case called. Accused Nabi Dad, Ameerullah and Murad are present on bail. Accused Roshan is produced in custody from District Prison and Correctional facility Sanghar. Accused Faqeer Muhammad @ Faqeero, and Ghulam Hyder have already been declared as Proclaimed offenders. ADPP for the state is present. Mr. Parvez Ahmed Bugti advocate for accused Nabi Dad is present. Mr. Ghulam Hussain Baloch advocate for accused Muhammad Murad is called absent. Mr. Hussain Bux Chang advocate for accused Roshan is absent. Process return served. NO Pws are present. Repeat summons to R/P.Ws. Call case property. Put off to 10.03.2026, for evidence. Accused Roshan is remanded back to custody. Present accused are directed to attend. |
| 8 | PPC 111/2025 | The State VS Ghulam Hyder & others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Rab Dino(ADVO-648-SBC-SGR),Sumaira(ADVO-814-SBC-SGR) | PPC-324,PPC-34,PPC-353 | 15/2025 Sinjhoro |
Case called. Accused Ghulam Hyder, Mazhar and Naveed are present on bail. Accused Ghulam Hussain @ Fanto produced in custody from District Prison Sanghar. ADPP for the State is present. Miss Sumaira Abullah advocate for accused Ghulam Hussain @ Fanto Naveed is present. Mr. Rab Dino Mangrio advocate for accused Ghulam Hyder and Mazhar is present. The record shows this case is connected with main Sessions Case No.110/2025 SV Ghulam Hyder and others U/S 392, 397, 34 PPC, Crime No.13/2025 of P.S Sinjhoro, which case has been adjourned. Summon is returned served. Complainant SIP Mehboob Ali Babar is present. Mashir HC Muhammad Khan Landar was present on last date of hearing, but today he is called absent. Repeat summons to R/P.Ws. Call case property. Put off to 09.03.2026, for evidence. Present accused and PWs are directed to attend. Accused Ghulam Hussain @ Panto is remanded back to custody. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 491 | |||||||
| 9 | Application u/s 491 CrPc 54/2026 | Saeedullah VS SSP Sanghar & Others | Cr.PC-491 | / |
Crl. Misc Application called. Applicant is called absent and his counsel is present. Raid report is received from learned Consumer Protection Judge/Civil Judge and J.M, Sanghar, that, alleged detainee was not found. Order on it. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open Court. The instant application U/S 491 Cr.P.C is hereby dismissed. |
||
| 10 | Application u/s 491 CrPc 56/2026 | Gulzar Ahmed VS SSP Sanghar & Others | Cr.PC-491 | / |
Crl. Misc Application called. Applicant and his counsel are called absent. Raid report is received from learned Consumer Protection Judge.Civil Judge and J.M, Sanghar, that, alleged detainee was not found. Order on it. Order passed and announced in open Court. The instant application U/S 491 Cr.P.C is hereby dismissed. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Formal Cases | |||||||
| 11 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 112/2025 | The State VS Ghulam Hussain @ Fanto | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Sumaira(ADVO-814-SBC-SGR) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 20/2025 Sinjhoro |
Case called. Accused Ghulam Hussain @ Fanto is produced is custody from District Prison Sanghar. Miss Sumaira Abdullah advocate for accused is present. ADPP for the State is present. The record shows this case is connected with main Sessions Case No.111/2025 SV Ghulam Hyder and others U/S 324,353, 34 PPC, Crime No.15/2025 of P.S Sinjhoro, which case has been adjourned. P.O is on optional leave. Put off to 09.03.2026, for Statement of accused/ formal hearing. Accused Ghulam Hussain @ Fanto is remanded back to custody with direction to produced next date of hearing. |
| 12 | PPC 110/2025 | The State VS Ghulam Hyder & others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR),Asif Ali(ADVO-589-SBC-SGR) | Rab Dino(ADVO-648-SBC-SGR),Sumaira(ADVO-814-SBC-SGR) | PPC-34,PPC-392,PPC-397 | 13/2025 Sinjhoro |
Case called. Accused Ghulam Hyder, Mazhar and Naveed are present on bail. Accused Ghulam Hussain @ Fanto is produced is custody from District Prison Sanghar. Miss Sumaira Abullah advocate for accused Ghulam Hussain @ Fanto Naveed is present. ADPP for the State is present. Mr. Rab Dino Mangrio advocate accused Ghulam Hyder and Mazhar is present. Complainant and his counsel Mr. Asif Ali Jat advocate are called absent. Put off to 09.03.2026, for Statement of accused/formal hearing. Accused Ghulam Hussain @ Fanto is remanded back to custody with direction to produced next date of hearing. Present accused are directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 13 | Forest/Wild Life Acts 43/2026 | The State VS Jamal & Others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-SGR) | Sindh Wildlife Preservation Conservation Act-2020-21,Sindh Wildlife Preservation Conservation Act-2020-73 (2),Sindh Wildlife Preservation Conservation Act-2020-9 (1) | 1/2026 Wild Life Sanghar |
Case called. Accused All accused called absent and shown in challan charge sheet as absconder. B.W issued against accused persons, but not returned served or un-served. I/O Asad Ali Mari Game officer is called absent. Repeat B.W against accused persons. Put off to 03.03.2026, for service. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 213/2025 |
Bahadur VS Province of Sindh & Others | Shahzad Ali(ADVO-4938-SBC-HYD) | DDA(DDA-0001-GOV-SGR) | Civil Appeal Called. The attorney for the appellants and their counsel are called absent. All respondents are called absent. Mr. Sher Ali Behan advocate appeared and filed Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent No.8(i) at (Ex.08). Order on it. File. The learned DDA is present. Notice issued against respondents No.7,9, and 15 and returned un-served, as per endorsement of bailiff. One namely Sikandar Ali attorney of appellant is present and filed statement alongwith original special power of attorney at (Ex.09). Order on it. File. The advocate for appellants has sent an application U/O 5 Rule 20 CPC read with section 151 CPC through attorney Sikander Ali for substitute service by of publication any newspapers alongwith affidavit at (Ex.10 and Ex.11). Order passed on separate sheet. The instant application for substitute service is hereby allowed accordingly. Let the notice against respondents all the private respondents except respondent No.8(i) Taj Muhammad, be issued through publication in Newspapers daily Kawish Hyderabad and daily Nawa-e-Waqat Islamabad on costs Put off to 07.03.2026, for service upon private respondents except resident No.8(i) Taj Muhammad through publication |
||
| 2 | Summary Suits 4/2026 |
Ghulam Mustafa VS Jan Muhammad | Faisal Khan(ADVO-538-SBC-SGR) | Summary suit Called. Plaintiff absent and his counsel are called absent. Notice not issued against defendant due non-payment of process fee. Mr. Asad Jahangeer Arain advocate, appeared and filed Vakalatnama on behalf of plaintiff at (Ex.06). Order on it. File. He has also filed condonation application at (Ex.07). Order on it. Condoned the costs deposited within (7) days. Repeat notice against defendant on costs. Put off to 03.03.2026, for service. |
|||
| 3 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 16/2026 |
Aijaz Ahmed VS Zafar Faqeer & Others | Insaf Ali(ADVO-628-SBC-SGR) | Civil Appeal called. Appellant is present and his counsel is called absent. Notice not issued against respondents No.1 & 2 due non-payment of process fee. Official respondents are called absent Mr Waseem Ahmed DDA for official respondent???s is present. The advocate for appellant has sent condonation application at (Ex.06). Order on it. Condoned as last chance costs be deposited within (7) days. Repeat notice against respondent No.1 & 2 by way of pasting on the outer door on the pointation of appellant and register Post A/D on costs. Put off to 05.03.2026, for service upon respondents No.1 & 2. |
|||
| 4 | Summary Suits 10/2026 |
Amjad Ali VS Abdul Qadir | Muhammad Tahir (ADVO-543-SBC-SGR) | Summary suit Called. Plaintiff is called absent and his counsel is present. Notice issued against defendant through bailiff and same is returned served upon defendant. Defendant is present. Mr.Tahmasib Saeed Jat advocate to appeared and filed Vakalatnama on behalf of defendant at (Ex.04). Order on it. File. He has also filed an application U/O XXXVII Rule 3 CPC alongwith affidavit at (Ex.05 and Ex.06). Order on it. Notice to other side. Put off to 02.3.2026, for arguments/objection on application U/O XXXVII Rule 3 CPC. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 5 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 166/2024 |
Mst. Zaib-Ul-Nissa VS Province of Sindh, Through Secretary Revenue, Board of Revenue Sindh & Others | Muhammad Younas() | Ashok Kumar (ADVO-791-SBC-SGR),DDA(DDA-0001-GOV-SGR) | Civil Appeal called. Appellant is called absent and her counsel Mr. Sher Ali Behan advocate is present. Official respondent is called absent. Mr. Waseem Ahmed DDA for official respondent is present. The L.Rs of respondent No. 7(a),8(1), 8(b) (i to iv),(C) i (i) and their counsel Mr. Ashok Kumar are called absent. Attorney of applicant/intervener and his counsel Mr. Haji Khan Hingoro advocate are called absent. in the interest of justice matter is adjourned. Put off to 28.2.2026, for arguments on main appeal and on application U/O 1 Rule 10 CPC. |
||
| 6 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 216/2024 |
Wazir Hussain VS Amir Hamza & Others | Ameer Hussain (ADVO-322-SBC-SGR) | DDA(DDA-0001-GOV-SGR),Muhammad Yaseen(ADVO-324-SBC-SGR) | Civil Appeal called. Appellant is called absent and his counsel Mr. Manzoor Ali Lashari is present. Attorney of Respondents No.1 to 10 and his counsel Mr. Muhammad Yaseen Khaskheli advocate are present. Official respondents are called absent. The learned DDA for official respondents is present. The advocate for appellant has filed adjournment application at (Ex.22). Order on it. Allowed as last chance. Put off to 28.02.2026, for further arguments. |
||
| 7 | Summary Suits 30/2025 |
Tarique Khan VS Muhammad Juman | Daleep Kumar(ADVO-569-SBC-SGR) | Iftakhar Hussain (ADVO-3901-SBC-HYD) | Summary suit called. Plaintiff is called absent and his counsel is present. Defendant and his counsel are present. Arguments heard. Order passed on application U/O XXXVI Rule 3 CPC. Consequently, the application U/O: XXXVII Rule 3 CPC, has been allowed, but conditionally subject to furnishing surety/security by defendant in the sum of Rs. 10,00,000/- (One Million) till next date of hearing. The application in hand stands disposed of accordingly. Put off to 07.03.2026 for compliance and written statement and further proceedings. |
||
| 8 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 200/2025 |
Rashid Ali VS Ali Hassan & Others | Muhammad Sharif Misrani(ADVO-268-SBC-SGR) | DDA(DDA-0001-GOV-SGR),Rizwan Ali(ADVO-428-SBC-SGR) | Civil Appeal called. Appellant and his counsel are present. Respondent No.1 to 4 and their counsel Mr. Rizwan Ali Jat are present. Official Respondent is called absent Mr. Waseem Ahmed DDA for official respondents are present. Respondents No.08 is present. The arguments heard by the learned counsel for respondents side. Put off to 03.03.2026, for further arguments. |
||
| 9 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 206/2025 |
Aziz Ahmed VS Province of Sindh & Others | Hasnain(ADVO-510-SBC-SGR) | DDA(DDA-0001-GOV-SGR) | Civil appeal called. Appellant and his counsel are present. Respondent No. 8 is called absent, while remaining respondent are called absent. Mr. Waseem Ahmed DDA for official respondents is present. Final arguments heard. Put off to 25.02.2026, for further arguments. |
||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | F.A. (Family Appeals) 38/2025 | Mst. Samreen VS Anwar-Ul-Haq | Muhammad Sharif Misrani(ADVO-268-SBC-SGR) | Family Appeal-Section 14 of Family Court Act | Family appeal called. Appellant and her counsel called absent. Respondent is called absent. Notice issued against respondent but not returned served or un-served. Repeat notice against respondent through Court and TCS on costs. Put off to 28.02.2026, for service. |
||
| 2 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 8/2026 | Ghulam Hyder VS Public at Large | Iqrar Ali Panhwar(ADVO-581-SBC-SGR) | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-372 | Succession Application called. Applicant is called absent and his counsel is present and submitted statement alongwith publication in daily newspapers Kawish Hyderabad dated 19.02.2026 at (Ex.09). Order on it. File. Put off to 05.03.2026. for appearance of opponents. |
||