| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | BA in SC (Bail Application in Cases) 518/2025 | Gulsher & Others VS The State | Tarique Mehboob(ADVO-165-SBC-SGR) | PPC-109,PPC-302,PPC-34,PPC-342 | / |
Case and Criminal bail application U/s 497 Cr.P.C for accused Gulsher, Mukhtiar Rajput, and Allah Bachayo called. Accused Ghulam Shabir and Tanveer Hussain are present on interim bail granted by Honourable High Court of Sindh, Circuit Court, and Mirpurkhas. Accused PC Noor Ali, PC Rafique Ahmed, WHC Mukhtiar Rajput, SIP Gul Sher Chandio and LHC Allah Bachayo are produced in custody from District Prison, Sanghar. While accused PC Mohram Ali, PC Gul Muhammad and Amanullah are called absent, who are shown as absconder in interim challan. Repeat NBW against absconding accused PC Mohram Ali, Gul Muhammad Zardari and Amanullah Sand as ordered earlier. FIA prosecutor is present. Mr. Muhammad Ali Shaikh advocate for accused Rafique Ahmed is called absent. Mr. Tarique Mehboob advocate for accused Tanveer Hussain, Gulsher, Mukhtiar Rajput, and Allah Bachayo is present. I.O present and submitted application U/S 344 Cr.P.C for grant of time to submit final report. Order on it. Allowed. He has also submitted documents. Order on it. Mr. Bhagwan das advocate appeared and filed Vakalatnama on behalf of accused Noor Ali. Order on it. File. The advocate for accused Filed statement alongwith case law. Order on it. File. Notice issued against complainant and returned served. Complainant is present. Arguments heard on bail application U/s 497 Cr.P.C or accused Gulsher, Mukhtiar Rajput, and Allah Bachayo. Order passed and announced in open Court. The instant bail application having no merits for consideration is hereby dismissed accordingly. Certified true copy of order dated 16.03.2026, passed by the Honourable High Court in Criminal Bail application No.S-408 of 2025 Ghulam Shabbir Dalwani VS The state and Criminal Bail Application No.2-42/2026 Tanveer Hussain VS The State, whereby are hereby confirmed on the same terms as earlier granted in the interim order, is received from Hon???able Sessions Judge, Sanghar vide latter No.3555/2026 Sanghar dated 25.03.2026, whereby Put off to 08-04-2026 for service. Present accused are directed to attend. Accused SIP Gul Sher Chandio, WHC Mukhtiar Rajput, LHC Allah Bachayo, PC Rafique Ahmed and PC Noor Ali are remanded back to custody. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 2 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 310/2026 | Abdul Wahid VS The State | Sajad Hassan(ADVO-779-SBC-SGR) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-498 | 37/2026 Sanghar |
A.B.A called. Applicant/accused is present on interim pre-arrest bail. Mr. Sajjad Hassan Advocate for applicant/accused is present. Mr. Jamaluddin ADPP for the state is present. Notice issued to complainant and returned served. Complainant is called absent. I.O is present and submitted report. Order on it. File. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open Court. Consequently, this bail application is dismissed and ad-interim bail earlier granted to applicant/accused vide order dated 19.03.2026 is hereby recalled. His bail bonds stands cancelled and surety discharged. Intimation be sent to concerned sHO/I.O for information and compliance. Let such intimation be sent to concerned SHO/I.O for information and compliance. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 3 | PPC 361/2025 | The State VS Ali Gul & others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Muhammad Jahangir(ADVO-588-SBC-SGR) | PPC-324,PPC-34,PPC-353 | 41/2025 Perumal |
Case called. Accused Ali Gul is present on bail. Accused Mehboob @ Muhib, Asghar, Rajab @ Mitho and Wahab they have been declared as Proclaimed offenders. Mr. ADPP for the state is present. Mr. Muhammad Jahangir Qureshi advocate Ali Gul is called absent. Process return served. Complainant SIP Allah Rakhio and Mashir Kewat Kumar are present. Accused has filed adjournment application on the ground that my counsel went to Khairpur. Order on it. Allowed as prayed. Repeat summons to complainant and R/P.Ws. Call case property. Put off to 08.04.2026, for evidence. Present accused is directed to attend. |
| 4 | PPC 379/2025 | The State VS Ali Muhammad and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Allah Bux Chang(ADVO-448-SBC-SGR) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-324,PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-Fi,PPC-337-H,PPC-504 | 27/2025 Mangli |
Case called. Accused Ali Muhammad, Ghulam Qadir @ Abdul Qadir, Nazar Muhammad @ Khuda Nazar, Wali Muhammad, Attaullah, Abdul Razzaque and Javed @ Muhammad Javed are present on bail. ADPP for the state is present. Mr. Allah Bux chang advocate for all accused is called absent. Process is return served. Complainant and P.Ws are present. Mr. Naeem Ahmed Rehmani advocate, for complainant is called absent, his junior is present. Accused has filed adjournment application that my counsel is engaged in another personal matter. Allowed as preyed. Repeat summons to R/P.Ws. Call case property. Put off to 16.04.2026, for evidence. Present accused are directed to attend. |
| 5 | Forest/Wild Life Acts 453/2025 | The State VS Shahzoor & another | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-SGR) | Hasnain(ADVO-510-SBC-SGR) | Sindh Wildlife Preservation Conservation Act-2020-21,Sindh Wildlife Preservation Conservation Act-2020-9 (1) | 30/2025 Wild Life Sanghar |
Case called. Accused Shahzor is present on bail, while accused Hidayatullah is present on P.R bond. Mr. Hasnain Nizamani advocate for accused Shahzor is called absent. I.O Asad Ali Mari is called absent and sent adjournment application. Order on it. Last chance for B.W. No Pws are present. Issue B.Ws to complainant and P.Ws. Call case property. Put off to 01.04.2026, for evidence/compliance report U/S 27 as well as 74 of the Act, Present accused are directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 491 | |||||||
| 6 | Application u/s 491 CrPc 86/2026 | Sadiq VS SSP Sanghar & Others | Mir Sarfraz Ali(ADVO-459-SBC-MKS) | Cr.PC-491 | / |
Criminal Misc Application called. Applicant and his counsel are present. Process issued same is returned served. SHO of PS Chotiaryoon recovered detainees and produced before this Court through ASI Ghulam Rasool along-with report and memo of recovery of detainees. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open Court. The alleged detainees present in Court want to shift somewhere else along with applicant and minors, therefore, applicant and detainees are set at liberty to go to any place of their choice. However, the proposed accused is at liberty to avail proper legal remedy, if they desire so. The instant application stands disposed of accordingly. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 7 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 524/2026 | Qurban Ali VS SSP Sanghar & Others | Muhammad Younis(ADVO-733-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I),Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Criminal Miscellaneous Application called. Applicant and his counsel are present. Reports are received from SHO PS Mangli and In-charge SP complaint cell Sanghar. Order on it. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open Court. The instant application stands disposed off accordingly. |
|
| 8 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 539/2026 | Mst. Razia Bibi VS SSP Sanghar & Others | Aijaz Ali(ADVO-656-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Criminal Miscellaneous Application called. Applicant and her counsel are called absent. Reports are received from SHO PS Jhol and In-charge SP complaint cell Sanghar. Order on it. Order passed and announced in open Court. Today instant application is fixed for hearing, but the absence of applicant and her counsel shows that, she has lost her interest to proceed the matter. Consequently instant Criminal Misc: Application is hereby dismissed in non-prosecution. |
|
| 9 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 550/2026 | Hazooran VS SSP Sanghar & Others | Iqdad Ali(ADVO-53266-SBC-KHS) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Criminal Miscellaneous Application called. Applicant and her counsel are present. Reports are received from SHO PS Jhol and In-charge SP complaint cell Sanghar. Order on it. Proposed accused No.1 to 3 voluntarily appeared. Mr. Ashok Kumar advocate appeared and filed Vakalatnama on behalf of proposed accused. The learned counsel for applicant has filed withdrawal statement. Order passed on separate sheet. The instant application U/S 22-A 6(i) Cr.P.C being dismissed as withdrawn. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Supply of Copies | |||||||
| 10 | PPC 235/2025 | The State VS Zubair & others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Abdul Jabbar Panhwar(),Ghulam Hussain(ADVO-403-SBC-SGR),Mir Mal (ADVO-4078-SBC-HYD),Zafar Hayat(ADVO-404-SBC-SGR) | PPC-324,PPC-34,PPC-353 | 28/2025 Sinjhoro |
Case called. Accused Zubair and Roshan are produced in custody from District Prison and correctional Facility Sanghar. Accused Muhammad Murad and Sajjad @ Shahzad @ Sarfaraz @ Ajay are present on bail. ADPP for the state is present. Mr. Hussain Bux Chang advocate for accused Roshan is present. Mr. Ghulam Hussain Baloch advocate for accused Muhammad Murad is present. Mr. Mir Mal Oad advocate for accused Sajjad @ Shahzad @ Sarfaraz @ Ajay is present. Copies as required U/S 265-C Cr.P.C are supplied to accused and such receipt is obtained from him R&R as?????????????????????????????????Ex:17 Put off to 07.04.2026, for Amended charge. Present accused are directed to attend. Accused Zubair and Roshan are remanded back to custody. |
| 11 | PPC 71/2026 | The State VS Ali Raza and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-324,PPC-337-H,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | 36/2026 Sanghar |
Case called. Accused Ali Raza, Sohail Raza, Faisal Raza, Zeeshan Raza @ Shanu, Zaheer-u-Din and Muhammad Din @ Bada are present on bail. ADPP for the State is present. Copies as required U/S 265-C Cr.P.C are supplied to accused and such receipt is obtained from them R&R as???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????.Ex:01 Put off to 08.04.2026, for Charge. Accused are directed to attend. |
|
| 12 | PPC 86/2026 | The State VS Muhammad Nadeem and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Hussain Bux Mari(ADVO-483-SBC-SGR) | PPC-395 | 3/2026 Mangli |
Case called. Accused Muhammad Nadeem and Muhammad Pariyal @ Paru are present on bail. Accused Bilal and Illahi Bux @ Illaho they have already been declared as Proclaimed offenders. ADPP for the state is present. Mr. Hussain Bux Mari advocate for accused Muhammad Pariyal @ Paru is called. Copies as required U/S 265-C Cr.P.C are supplied to accused and such receipt is obtained from the R&R as???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????.Ex:05. Put off to 09.04.2026, for charge. Accused are directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 13 | PPC 64/2026 | The State VS Arshad Ali & others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Sumaira(ADVO-814-SBC-SGR) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-324,PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-Fi,PPC-337-Fiii,PPC-337-L | 155/2025 Sinjhoro |
Case called. Accused Arshad Ali, Irshad, Niaz Muhammad, and Shah Muhammad are on bail. Accused Gulsher is already declared P.O. ADPP for the State is present. Ms. Sumaira Abdullah Advocate for all accused is present. Charge framed against accused persons is recorded R&R at?????????????????????????????????..Ex.02 their Pleas of accused persons recorded R&R at??????Ex.03 to 06) respectively. Accused pleaded not guilty and claimed to be trial. Issue summons to complainant and P.Ws. Call case property. Put off to 15.04.2026, for evidence. Present accused are directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Statement of Accused | |||||||
| 14 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 236/2025 | The State VS Roshan | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Abdul Jabbar Panhwar() | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 30/2025 Sinjhoro |
Case called. Accused Roshan is produced in custody from District Prison and correctional facility Sanghar. ADPP for the state is present. Mr. Hussain Bux Chang advocate for accused is present. The record shows this case is connected with main Sessions Case No.235/2025 Re-The State SV Zobair and others U/S 324,353,34 PPC, Crime No.28/2025, of P.S Sinjhoro, which case has been adjourned. Put off to 07.04.2026, for statement of accused/formal hearing. Accused is remanded back to custody. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Final Arguments | |||||||
| 15 | Illegal Dispos. Act (Illegal Dispossesion Act) 288/2024 | Shoaib Akhtar VS Nooral & Others | Faisal Khan(ADVO-538-SBC-SGR) | Ghulam Hussain(ADVO-403-SBC-SGR) | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3/4 illegal Dispossession Act,illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 5,illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 6 | / |
Case called. Accused Nooral, Naseer, Abdul Malik, Tarique and Sarwar are present on bail. Mr. Ghulam Hussain Baloch advocate for all accused is present. Complainant and his counsel are present. Final arguments heard. Judgment passed and announced in open Court. Accused Nooral, Naseer, Abdul Malik, Tarique and Sarwar have been acquitted U/s 2650H(i) Cr.P.C, they are present on bail, their bail bonds stands cancelled and sureties discharged. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 16 | SC (Murder Trial) 518/2025 | The State VS Ghulam Shabbir Dalwani & Others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-SGR) | Muhammad Ali Shaikh(ADVO-158-SBC-SGR),Tarique Mehboob(ADVO-165-SBC-SGR) | PPC-109,PPC-302,PPC-34,PPC-342 | / |
Case and Criminal bail application U/s 497 Cr.P.C for accused Gulsher, Mukhtiar Rajput, and Allah Bachayo called. Accused Ghulam Shabir and Tanveer Hussain are present on interim bail granted by Honourable High Court of Sindh, Circuit Court, and Mirpurkhas. Accused PC Noor Ali, PC Rafique Ahmed, WHC Mukhtiar Rajput, SIP Gul Sher Chandio and LHC Allah Bachayo are produced in custody from District Prison, Sanghar. While accused PC Mohram Ali, PC Gul Muhammad and Amanullah are called absent, who are shown as absconder in interim challan. Repeat NBW against absconding accused PC Mohram Ali, Gul Muhammad Zardari and Amanullah Sand as ordered earlier. FIA prosecutor is present. Mr. Muhammad Ali Shaikh advocate for accused Rafique Ahmed is called absent. Mr. Tarique Mehboob advocate for accused Tanveer Hussain, Gulsher, Mukhtiar Rajput, and Allah Bachayo is present. I.O present and submitted application U/S 344 Cr.P.C for grant of time to submit final report. Order on it. Allowed. He has also submitted documents. Order on it. Mr. Bhagwan das advocate appeared and filed Vakalatnama on behalf of accused Noor Ali. Order on it. File. The advocate for accused Filed statement alongwith case law. Order on it. File. Notice issued against complainant and returned served. Complainant is present. Arguments heard on bail application U/s 497 Cr.P.C or accused Gulsher, Mukhtiar Rajput, and Allah Bachayo. Order passed and announced in open Court. The instant bail application having no merits for consideration is hereby dismissed accordingly. Certified true copy of order dated 16.03.2026, passed by the Honourable High Court in Criminal Bail application No.S-408 of 2025 Ghulam Shabbir Dalwani VS The state and Criminal Bail Application No.2-42/2026 Tanveer Hussain VS The State, whereby are hereby confirmed on the same terms as earlier granted in the interim order, is received from Hon???able Sessions Judge, Sanghar vide latter No.3555/2026 Sanghar dated 25.03.2026, whereby Put off to 08-04-2026 for service. Present accused are directed to attend. Accused SIP Gul Sher Chandio, WHC Mukhtiar Rajput, LHC Allah Bachayo, PC Rafique Ahmed and PC Noor Ali are remanded back to custody. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Further Proceedings | |||||||
| 1 | S. Ex. (Summary Executions) 4/2024 |
Ali Muhammad VS Qadir Bux alias bhooro | Hasnain(ADVO-510-SBC-SGR) | Mir Mal (ADVO-4078-SBC-HYD) | Execution Application called. Plaintiff/Decree Holder and his counsel Mr. Muhammad Yaseen Khaskheli are called absent, his associate Mr. Zeeshan Khaskheli advocate is present. Defendant/J.D is called absent and his counsel Mr. Mir Mal Oad is present. First Appeal No.S-36 of 2024 Qadir Bux Versus Ali Muhammad is pending before Honourable, High Court of Sindh, Circuit Court, Mirpurkhas. The junior advocate for plaintiff/D.H has filed adjournment application at (Ex.12). Order on it. Allowed as preyed. Put off to 09.04.2026, for objections on application U/O 21 Rule 26, R/W Section 151 CPC/ further proceedings. |
||
| 2 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 2/2026 |
Ghulam Muhammad Since dead through his LRs & Others VS Muhammad Bux Since dead through his LRs & Others | Asad Jahangir(ADVO-401-SBC-SGR) | Asif Ali(ADVO-589-SBC-SGR),DDA(DDA-0001-GOV-SGR) | Civil Appeal called. Appellant No(b) himself as well as Attorney of other appellant and his counsel are present. L.Rs of respondent No.1(f) himself as well as attorney of other respondent No.(1), b & d to f and 2 and his counsel Mr. Asif Ali Jat are present. Respondent No.1(a) Mst Dadli has already been died. Official respondents are called absent. Mr. Javed Ahmed DDA for official respondent is present. L.Rs of respondent No.1(C) is present and filed an application for grant of time to engage an advocate at (Ex.13). Order on it. Allowed as prayed. Put off to 08.04.2026, for further proceedings. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 3 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 73/2011 |
Province of Sindh and others VS Abdul Haq | DDA(DDA-0001-GOV-SGR) | Jamsheed(ADVO-595-SBC-SGR) | Civil Appeal is called. The appellants are absent, while the learned DDA representing the appellants is present. The respondent is called absent and his Counsel Mr. Jamshed Leghari is present. No Officials witnesses are Present. Issue letter to Deputy Commissioner Sanghar with direction to depute any official to produce the relevant record. Put off to 08.04.2026, for evidence. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Hearing of Applications | |||||||
| 4 | Summary Suits 31/2024 |
Ghulam Sarwar VS Abdul Hameed | Sumaira(ADVO-814-SBC-SGR) | Kaleem Ullah (ADVO-669-SBC-SGR) | Summary suit Called. Both parties and their counsel are present. Heard arguments by the learned counsel for defendant on application U/S 151 CPC. Put off to 31.03.2026, for defendant side evidence/hearing/order application U/S 151 CPC. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 5 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 216/2024 |
Wazir Hussain VS Amir Hamza & Others | Harish Chander(ADVO-315-SBC-MKS) | DDA(DDA-0001-GOV-SGR),Muhammad Yaseen(ADVO-324-SBC-SGR) | Civil Appeal called. Appellant and his counsel are called absent. Attorney of Respondents No.1 to 10 is present and his counsel Mr. Muhammad Yaseen Khaskheli advocate is called absent, his associate Mr. Zeeshan advocate is present. Official respondents are called absent. The learned DDA for official respondents is present. The junior advocate for private of respondents has filed adjournment application at (Ex.09). Order on it. Allowed as preyed. Put off to 09.04.2026, for arguments. |
||
| 6 | Summary Suits 10/2026 |
Amjad Ali VS Abdul Qadir | Muhammad Tahir (ADVO-543-SBC-SGR) | Alam Khan (ADVO-508-SBC-SGR),Tahmasib Saeed() | Summary suit Called. Plaintiff is called absent and his counsel is present. Defendant and his counsel Mr. Tahmasib Saeed Jat are present. The learned counsel for plaintiff has filed objection /counter affidavit on application U/O XXXVII Rule 03 CPC for grant leave to defend at (Ex.07). Order on it. File. Arguments hearing on application leave to defend. Order passed and announce in court. Consequently the application U/O XXXVII Rule 3 CPC has been allowed. But conditionally subject furnishing surety/security by defendant in the equal amount till next date of hearing. The application in hand stands disposed of accordingly Put off to 09.4.2026, for compliance and written statement and further proceedings. |
||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | F.A. (Family Appeals) 38/2025 | Mst. Samreen VS Anwar-Ul-Haq | Muhammad Sharif Misrani(ADVO-268-SBC-SGR) | Family Appeal-Section 14 of Family Court Act | Family appeal called. Appellant is present and her counsel is called absent. Respondent is called absent. Notice/publication issued but not received. The advocate for appellant has filed condonation application at (Ex.15). Order on it. Issue fresh publication as already ordered. Put off to 02.04.2026, for service upon defendant through publication. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 2 | F.A. (Family Appeals) 12/2026 | Mst. Sanam VS Aijaz Ali | Muhammad Younis(ADVO-733-SBC-SGR) | Family Appeal-Section 14 of Family Court Act | Family appeal is called. Appellant and her counsel are present. Notice issued against defendant and returned served upon him, as per endorsement of bailiff. Defendant is present. Mr.Anwar Shahzad Khattak advocate has sent Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent, alongwith adjournment application at (Ex.04 and Ex.05). Order passed thereon. The advocate for appellant has filed statement alongwith postal receipt at (Ex.06). Order on it. File. Call R&Ps from trial Court. Put off to 13.04.2026, for arguments. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 3 | G.W. A. (G&W Appeals) 13/2025 | Mst. Darya Khatoon VS Public at Large | Muhammad Yaseen(ADVO-324-SBC-SGR) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 47 (Guardian Appeal ) | |||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Succession Miscellaneous Applications | |||||||
| 4 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 113/2025 | Muhammad Anwar VS Public at Large | Muhammad Jahangir(ADVO-588-SBC-SGR) | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-372 | Succession Application called. Applicant and his counsel are present. Opponents No.2 to 5 are called absent without any intimation or application. In the interest of justice Matter is adjourned. Put 08.04.2026, for appearance of opponents No.2 to 5. |
||
| 5 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 17/2026 | Jaffar Ali Rind VS Public at Large | Muhammad Sharif Misrani(ADVO-268-SBC-SGR) | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-372 | Succession Application called. Applicant and his counsel is present. Opponent No.2 & 5 are present and have filed their affidavit wherein they have given no objection grant of succession application (Ex 11 to Ex.15) Opponent No.02 Harchand has also filed affidavit wherein he has given no objection to allow application U/S 32 Rule 3 CPC and on behalf of opponent No. 6 to 7 (as guardian ad-litem being their real grandfather) R & R as Ex:15. Two witnesses namely Hazoor Bux and Yakhtiar are present and they have also filed their affidavits in support of the contentions of applicant (Ex: 16 and Ex: 17). Order on it. Put off to 07.04.2026, for hearing. |
||