| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 340/2025 | The State VS Muhammad Usman | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Hasnain(ADVO-510-SBC-SGR) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 87/2025 Sinjhoro |
Case called. Accused Muhammad Usman is present on bail. Mr. Husnain Nizmani advocate for accused is absent. ADPP for the state is present. Process return served. P.W P.C Shaahid Ali is present and examined. D/o P.C Shahid Ali is recorded R&R at?????????????????????????????????????????????Ex.08. He has produce acknowledgment receipt R&R at????????????????????????????????????????????????.Ex.8/A. Case property is produced and returned back with direction to produce on next date of hearing. Repeat summons to R/P.Ws. Call case property. Put off to 24.02.2026, for evidence. Present accused is directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 2 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 222/2026 | Loniyo VS SSP Sanghar & Others | Raja Ram Chander(ADVO-1239-SBC-MKS) | Cr.PC-22-A,Cr.PC-22-B | / |
Crl. Misc Application called. Applicant and his counsel are present. Reports are received from SHO PS Sinjhoro and In-charge SP complaint cell Sanghar. Order on it. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open Court. The S.H.O P.S Sinjhoro and S.H.O P.S Sanghar are directed to provide legal protection to the applicant and his family members in accordance with law. However, this order shall not affect any enquiry, proceedings or trial, if, already pending against applicant and his family members. Further above directions/instructions shall not be exploited, rather official respondent/S.H.O concerned shall act strictly in accordance with his function and duties and also to take action if anybody takes law into their hands. The application is disposed of accordingly. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Further Proceedings | |||||||
| 1 | S. Ex. (Summary Executions) 2/2025 |
Amjad Ali VS Zahid Ali | Asad Jahangir(ADVO-401-SBC-SGR) | |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 2 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 183/2025 |
M/S Goklani Brothers Sanghar City Filling & CNG Station VS Federation of Pakistan Through Ministry of energy Petroleum Division & Others | Allah Bux Chang(ADVO-448-SBC-SGR),Nand Kumar(ADVO-232-SBC-SGR) | Bashir Ahmed Sethar(ADVO-3099-SBC-HYD),DDA(DDA-0001-GOV-SGR),Muhammad Ali(ADVO-2056-SBC-HYD) | Civil Appeal Called. Attorney of appellant and his counsel are present. Respondent No.06 and his counsel Mr. Shaikh Naveed Anwar are called absent. Respondent No.05 and his counsel Mr. Hemandas S.Sanghani advocate are called absent, his associate Mr. Ashok Kumar Gullani advocate is absent. Respondent No.9 & 10 are called absent. Mr. Javed Ahmed DDA for official respondents is present. Notice not issued against respondent No.1,7 & 8 due non-payment of process fee. Respondent No.2,3,& 4 and their counsel Mr. Muhammad Ali Shaikh are called absent. The advocate for applicants has filed an application U/O 5 Rule 20 CPC for substitute service upon respondents No.1,7, & 8 by of publication any newspapers alongwith affidavit at (Ex.12 and Ex.13). Order passed on separate sheet. The instant application for substitute service is hereby allowed accordingly. Let the notice against respondents No.1,7 & 8 be issued through publication in Newspapers daily Nawai-e-Waqat Islamabad and Karachi on costs. Put off to 26.02.2026, for service through publication upon respondents No.1,7 & 8, |
||
| 3 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 205/2025 |
Sarfraz & another VS Ghazi Khan & Others | Rab Dino(ADVO-648-SBC-SGR) | Civil Appeal called. Appellants No.1 is present, while appellant is called absent and their counsel is present. Notice not issued against respondents due non-payments of process fee. The advocate for appellant has filed condonation application at (Ex.11). Order on it. Allowed in the interest of justice. Respondent No.1, 23 and attorney of respondent No.24 are present. Mr. Hosh Muhammad Mangi advocate has appeared and filed Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent No.1, 23 and attorney of respondent No.24 at (Ex.12 and Ex.12). Order on it. File. Repeat notice to the respondents No.2 to 22 and 25 to 29 as already ordered. Put off to 24.02.2026, for service upon respondents No.2 to 22 and 25 to 29. |
|||
| 4 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 8/2026 |
Saeed Khan VS Daya Zainab Bibi & Others | Muhammad Yaseen(ADVO-324-SBC-SGR) | DDA(DDA-0001-GOV-SGR),Sarfaraz Ahmed(ADVO-485-SBC-SGR) | Civil Appeal Called. Appellant is present and his counsel is called absent, his associate Mr. Muhammad Ismail advocate is present. Attorney of respondent No.02 to 6 and his Counsel Mr. Shabir Ahmed are present. Official respondents are called absent. Mr. Javed Ahmed DDA for official respondents is present. Notice issued against respondent No.01 through Court and TCS, but not returned served or un-served. The junior counsel for appellant has submitted confirmation report of TCS. Order on it. One namely Aftab Nohpoto brother of respondent No.1 is appeared on and filed an application for grant of time to engage an advocate on net date of hearing at (Ex.10). Order on it. Allowed as prayed. Call R&Ps from trial Court. Put off to 23.02.2026, for further proceedings. |
||
| 5 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 15/2026 |
Darvesh VS Province of Sindh & Others | Muhammad Yaseen(ADVO-324-SBC-SGR) | Civil Appeal called. Appellant is Present and his Counsel is called absent, his junior is present. Official respondents are called absent. Mr. Javed Ahmed DDA for official respondents is present. Notices not issued against respondents No.1, 5 & 6 due non-payment of process fee. Mr. Mirza Fawad Saleem Baig advocate has appeared and filed statement/under taking that he will filed vakalatnama on behalf of respondent No.5 & 6 at (Ex.07). Order on it. File. Put off to 25.02.2026, for arguments/Failing Vakalatnama of respondent No.5 & 6. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 6 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 147/2025 |
Muhammad Ramzan VS Muhammad Ashraf & Others | Muhammad Yaseen(ADVO-324-SBC-SGR) | Civil Appeal called. Appellant and his Counsel are called absent, his associate Mr. Muhammad Ismail advocate is present. Official respondent is called absent. Mr. Javed Ahmed DDA for official respondents is present. Respondent No.1 is called absent and service against him has already been held good. The advocate for appellant has sent adjournment application at (Ex.17). Order on it. Allowed. The advocate for appellant is directed to argument on next date of hearing, in case of failure appeal will be disposed of accordingly. Put off to 26.02.2026, for arguments, |
|||
| 7 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 3/2026 |
Imtiaz-Ul-Haq & another VS Darvish & Others | Mirza Fawad Saleem(ADVO-298-SBC-SGR) | DDA(DDA-0001-GOV-SGR),Muhammad Yaseen(ADVO-324-SBC-SGR) | Civil Appeal called. The appellant No.1 himself as well as attorney of appellant No.02 and his counsel are called absent, while his counsel is present. Respondent No. 1 is present and his counsel is called absent, his junior is present The Advocate for for appellants has filed an application U/O 151 CPC for extension of status-quo at (Ex.10). Order on it. Allowed as prayed. Official respondents are called absent. The DDA for official respondents is present. The advocate for appellant has sent adjournment application at (Ex.11). Order on it. Allowed as prayed. The both side learned counsel are directed to arguments on next date of hearing, in case of failure appeal will be disposed of accordingly Put off to 25.02.2026, for arguments. |
||
| 8 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 4/2026 |
Shahzad Hussain VS Maznoor Ahmed Since dead through his LRs & Others | Jamsheed(ADVO-595-SBC-SGR) | DDA(DDA-0001-GOV-SGR),Mirza Fawad Saleem(ADVO-298-SBC-SGR) | |||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Succession Miscellaneous Applications | |||||||
| 1 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 81/2025 | Mst. Maryam VS Public at Large | Naeem Ahmed(ADVO-458-SBC-SGR) | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-372 | Succession Application called. Applicant and her counsel are called absent, his junior is present. Report not received Manager Bank Islami Pakistan Limited Sanghar, Branch. The junior advocate for applicant has filed an application for adjournment at (Ex.12). Order on it. Allowed as prayed. Put 20.02.2026, for further proceedings. |
||