The case called. Accused Ali Raza @ Paro is present on bail. ADPP for state and Mr. Mir Mal Oad advocate for accused appointed on state expenses are present. Mr. Afzal Karim Virk defence counsel for accused is called absent. No PWS are present. This case is off shoot of Sessions Case No. 247/2023 state VS Ali Raza @ Paro & Others U/S 302 PPC, Crime No. 36/2022 of PS Perumal., which case has been adjourned. Process is returned un-served. Repeat process against the remaining PWs and call case property. Put off to 23.04.2026 for evidence. Accused is directed to attend.

The case called. Accused Chakar Khan is present on bail. ADPP for state and Mr. Mir Mal Oad advocate for accused appointed on state expenses are present. Mr. Mian Taj Muhammad Keerio for accused is called absent, his associate Mr. Ramz Ali advocate is present. This case is off shoot of Sessions Case No. 247/2023 state VS Ali Raza @ Paro & Others U/S 302 PPC, Crime No. 36/2022 of PS Perumal., which case has been adjourned. Process is returned un-served. Repeat process against the remaining Pws as ordered earlier and call case property. Put off to 23.04.2026 for evidence. Accused is directed to attend.

The case called. Accused Ali Raza @ Paroo, Chakar Khan and Ali Gohar are present on bail. Accused Pasand Ali is called absent, who has been declared as P.O. ADPP for state and Mr. Jamshed Laghari advocate for complainant are present. Learned defence counsel Mr. Mian Taj Muhammad Keerio for accused Chakar Khan is called absent, his associate Mr. Ramz Ali advocate is present and filed adjournment application. Order passed on separate sheet. Mr. Afzal Karim Virk defence counsel for accused Ali Raza and Ali Gohar is present. Mr. Mir Mal oad advocate appointed on state expenses is also present. This case is marked as an old one. The Hohourable, High Court of Sindh, Karachi as per letter received from Honourable, District & Sessions Judge, Sanghar vide No. DJ SGR: No.14383/2025 Sanghar Dated 02.12.2025 ordered to decide such cases expeditiously by fixing twice a week. Process is returned served. Complainant Gul Muhammad Mashir Fiyaz Ahmed and P.Ws Javed Hussain are present. Order passed on order sheet. Be that as it may be the adjournment application is allowed with strict direction to proceed the matter without any further delay. Repeat process against the remaining PWs and call complete case property. Put off to 23.04.2026 for evidence. Accused are directed to attend.

The case called. Accused Ali Muhammad is present on bail. ADPP for state and defence counsel for accused are present. This case is connected with Sessions Case No. 57/2024 State VS Ali Muhammad & Others U/S 302, 324, 337-F(iii), 337-F(v), 337-F(iv), 337-F(vi), 337-H(ii), 109, 147, 148, 149 PPC, Crime No. 121/2023 of PS Mangli, which case has been adjourned. Hence, this case is also adjourned. No PWs are present. Repeat summons to PWs. Call case property. Put off to: 27.04.2026, for evidence. Accused is directed to attend.

The case called. Accused Ali Muhammad, Faiz Muhammad, Khair Muhammad and Pir Bux are present on bail. While accused Hoat, Sahib Khan, Ghulam, Hameer and Bilawal are called absent, who have been declared as proclaimed offenders. ADPP for state, Mr. Faisal Khan Nizamani defence counsel for accused Pir Bux is called absent. Mr. Anwar Shahzad Khattak defence counsel for accused Khair Muhammad is present. Mr. Hussain Bux Mari counsel for complainant is called absent, his associate Mr. Khadim Hussain is present. Mr. Muhammad Yousuf Kalhoro defence counsel for accused Ali Muhammad and Faiz Muhammad are called absent. Complainant is called absent. No PWs are present. The Junior advocate to complainant has filed adjournment application. Order on it. Allowed as prayed. Repeat process against the remaining PWs. Call complete case property. Put off to: 27-04-2026, for evidence. Present accused are directed to attend.

Case called. Accused Ghulam Nabi, Anb, Saddam Hussain, Muhammad Yousif and Yasir Mehmood and Gul are present on bail. ADPP for the state is present. Mr. Zafar Hayat advocate for all accused is present. Complainant and his counsel Mr. Muhammad Ashraf Rehmani are called absent, without any intimation or application. Process returned served upon complainant through phone cell. No Pws are present. Repeat summons to R/P.Ws. Put off to 23.04.2026, for evidence. Present accused are directed to attend

Case called. Accused Ghulam Nabi, Saddam S/o Amb Imdad Ali, Ghalib, Ghulam Shabbir, Pahlo @ Pehlwan, Saddam S/O Liaquat, Muhammad Yousif, Amb, Wazeer, Liaquat Ali and Yasir are present on bail. Accused Rafique is called absent. Accused Gulzar has already been declared as proclaimed offender. ADPP for the state is present. Mr. Zafar Hayat advocate for all accused is present and filed adjournment application for excuse of absence of accused Rafique. Absence condoned. Complainant and his counsel Mr. Hasnain Nizamani are called absent. Process is returned un-served. Repeat summons to Complainant and P.Ws. Call case property (if any). Put off to 23.04.2026, for evidence. Accused are directed to attend.

Case called. Accused Qurban Ali is produced in custody from District Prison, and F.C Sanghar. While accused Muhammad Saleem already acquitted by this Court U/S: 265(i)-Cr.P.C. Accused Nadeem Ali already acquitted U/S: 345(6) by the Honourable High Court of Sindh, Mirpurkhas. Accused Rana waseem already declared as P.O. ADPP for the state, Mr. Imran Khan, advocate appeared and filed Vakalatnama on behalf of accused Qurban Ali. Order on it. File. Complainant is present. Mr. Rizwan Ahmed advocate for complainant is called absent. Charge framed against accused Qurban Ali R&R at??????????????????.Ex.28. Plea of accused is recorded R&R at??????????????????Ex.29 Accused pleaded not guilty and claimed to be trial. Issue summons to Complainant and P.Ws. Call case property. Put off to: 21-04-2026, for evidence. Accused is remanded back to custody.

Case called. Accused Muhammad Nadeem and Muhammad Pariyal @ Paru are present on bail. Accused Bilal and Illahi Bux @ Illaho they have already been declared as Proclaimed offenders. ADPP for the state is present. Mr. Hussain Bux Mari advocate for accused Muhammad Pariyal @ Paru is called. Charge framed against accused persons R&R at???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????Ex.02 Plea of accused Nadeem is recorded R&R at???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????.Ex.03 Plea of accused Pariyal @ Paru is recorded R&R at???????????????????????????????????????..Ex.04 Accused pleaded not guilty and claimed to be trial. Issue summons to Complainant and P.Ws. Call case property. Put off to 28.04.2026, for evidence. Accused are directed to attend.

Direct complaint/P.E called. Complainant and his counsel are present. Statement of Complainant U/S 200 Cr.P.C is recorded. Order passed on statement of complainant. In order to ascertain truthfulness or false-hood of complaint, let this criminal P.E be sent to learned Consumer Protection Judge/C.J & J.M, Sanghar, for recording statement of witnesses U/S 202 Cr.P.C and report. Put off to 16.04.2026, for recording statement of witnesses U/S 202 Cr.P.C and report.

Criminal Revision Application called. Applicant and his counsel are present. Respondents No.1 and his counsel Mr. Abid Ali Qureshi are present. Respondent No.4 himself and on behalf of respondent 5 is present and filed counter affidavit/objection to revision application ,435,439-A Cr.P.C Order on it. File. Respondent No.6 called absent. ADPP for the state is present. Notice issued against respondents 2 & 3 and returned un-served. Repeat notice against respondents No.2 & 3 Put off to 17.04.2026, for service.

Summary suit Called. Plaintiff and his counsel are present. Defendant is called absent and his counsel is present. The learned counsel for plaintiff objection to application U/O VII Rule 11 CPC at (Ex.10). Order on it. Copy to other side. Copy is received other side. Put off to 17.04.2026 for compliance U/O 10 Rule 2 CPC/ arguments on application U/O VII Rule 11 CPC.

Civil Appeal called. Appellant No.1 himself as well as attorney of appellant No.02 and his counsel are present. Respondent No.07 & 08 are called absent and their counsel Mr. Ashok Kumar advocate is present. Official respondents are called absent. Mr. Javed Ahmed DDA for official respondents is present. Respondent No.10 has been passed away Respondents No. No.6(a & B)and 9 to 14 and their counsel Mr. Parvaiz Ahmed Bugti are present. Notice issued against respondent No.12 and returned un-served, as per endorsement of bailiff. Repeat notice against respondent No.12 by way of pasting on the outer door on the pointation appellant on costs. Put off to 23.04.2026, for service.

Civil Misc Appeal called. Applicant No.03 himself as well as attorney other applicants and his counsel are present. Official respondents are called absent. Mr. Javed Ahmed DDA for official respondents is present. Respondent No.3(b) herself as well as attorney of respondent No.1,2 & 4 to 8 and his counsel Mr. Muktiar Ahmed are present. Notice not issued against respondents No.3(c to F) due to non-payment of process fee. The advocate for applicant has filed condonation application at (Ex.08). Order on it. Repeat notice against respondents No.3(c to F) T.Cs, as well as publication on costs. Put off to 17.04.2026, for service.

Summary suit Called. Plaintiff is called absent and his counsel is present. Defendant and his counsel Mr. Tahmasib Saeed Jat are present. The advocate for plaintiff has filed adjournment application at (Ex.08). Order on it. Put off to 16.4.2026, for written statement and further proceedings.

Civil Appeal called. Appellant and his counsel are present. Attorney of Respondents No.1 to 10 and his counsel Mr. Muhammad Yaseen Khaskheli advocate are present. Official respondents are called absent. The learned DDA for official respondents is present. Partly arguments heard. Put off to 21.04.2026, for further arguments

Civil Appeal called. Attorney of appellants and his counsel are present. L.Rs of Respondents No. 1(i),(ii to IV) is called absent and their Counsel Mr. Haibat Khan Bhatti advocate is present. Respondent No.10,11 and their counsel Mr. Tarique Mehboob advocate are called absent, his associate Mr. Asif Ali Jat Advocate is present and filed adjournment application at (Ex.27). Order on it. File. Official respondents are called absent. Mr. Javed Ahmed DDA for official respondent is present. Put off to 21.04.2026, for arguments of respondent No.10 & 11.

Civil Appeal called. Attorney of appellants and his Counsel are present. L.Rs of respondent No. 1(ii) to iV) are called absent and their counsel Mr. Haibat Khan Bhatti advocate is present. Official respondents are called absent. Mr. Javed Ahmed DDA for Officials respondent is present. Order passed on application U/O 41 Rule 27 CPC. The instant application being devoid of merits is hereby dismissed, with no order as to costs. Put off to 21.04.2026, for arguments on main appeal.

Civil Appeal called. Appellant No.1 himself as well as attorney of appellant No.02 and his counsel are present. Respondent No.1 is called absent, Respondent No.02 himself as well as attorney of respondents No.09 and their counsel Mr. Manzoor Ali Lashari advocate are present. Respondent No.8(a) himself as well as attorney of other L.Rs of Respondent No.8(c) and (e to G) are called absent and her counsel Mr. Imran Khan Khaskheli advocate is present. Official respondents are called absent. Mr. Javed Ahmed DDA for official respondents is present. The respondents No.8(D.H & I) are called absent and service against them has already been held good. Partly arguments heard. Put off to 23.04.2026, for further arguments.

Civil Appeal Called. Appellant is called absent and his counsel is present. Attorney of respondent No.1 to 6 are called absent and his Counsel Mr. Sarfraz Ahmed is present and filed adjournment application at (Ex.14). Order on it. Allowed as prayed. Official respondents are called absent. Mr. Javed Ahmed DDA for official respondents is present. Put off to 29.04.2026, for arguments.

Civil Appeal called. Appellant No.03 himself as well as attorney of other appellants and his counsel are present. Respondent No.1 and her counsel Mr. Muhammad Yaseen Khaskheli are present. Respondents No.2(i),3(a,b,c) and 4(i) are present and their counsel Mr. Jamshed Laghari is present. Official respondents are called absent. Mr. Javed Ahmed DDA for official respondents is present. The advocate for appellant has sent adjournment application at (Ex.10). Order on it. Allowed as prayed. Put off to 28.04.2026, for arguments.