| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 246/2026 | Mevo VS The State | Sumaira(ADVO-814-SBC-SGR) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 17/2026 Sinjhoro |
Criminal bail Application called. Advocate for applicant/accused and ADPP for the State are present. in the interest of justice B.A is adjourned. Put off to 11.03.2026, for arguments. |
| 2 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 255/2026 | Abdul Razzaq VS The State | Naeem Ahmed(ADVO-586-SBC-SGR) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-497 | / |
Criminal bail Application called. Advocate for applicant/accused and ADPP for the State are present. Notice issued against complainant and returned served upon him. Complainant is present and filed no objection affidavit. Order on it. File. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open Court. The post arrest bail has been granted to applicant/accused subject to furnishing surety in the sum of Rs:50,000/- (Fifty thousand) and PR bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of this Court. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 3 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 228/2026 | Liaquat Ali VS The State | Gohar Ali Shah(ADVO-2949-SBC-KHP) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-498 | 46/2026 Sanghar |
A.B.A called. Applicant/accused is present on interim pre-arrest bail. Mr. Gohar Ali Advocate for applicant/accused and ADPP for the state are present. Complainant is present. Mr. Hussain Bux Mari advocate appeared and filed Vakalatnama on behalf of complainant Order passed thereon. The advocate for accused file statement alongwith case law. Order on it. The advocate for complainant has filed statement alongwith case law. Order. File. He has also filed statement alongwith Pictures. Final arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open Court. Consequently, this bail application is dismissed and ad-interim bail earlier granted to applicant/accused vide order dated 02.03.2026 is hereby re-called. His bail bonds stands cancelled and surety discharged. |
| 4 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 231/2026 | Zia-Ul-Haq VS The State | Asif Ali(ADVO-4895-SBC-HYD) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-498 | 11/2026 Shahpur Chakar |
A.B.A called. Applicant/accused is present on interim pre-arrest bail. Mr. Asif Ali Unar Advocate for applicant/accused and ADPP for the state are present. Complainant is present. Mr. Amjad Ali advocate for complainant appeared and filed Vakalatnama on behalf of complainant. Order on it. File. Final arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open Court. Interim pre-arrest bail earlier granted to applicant/accused is hereby confirmed on same terms and conditions with direction to co-operate with investigation officer of face the trial. Intimation be sent to concerned SHO, for information and compliance. |
| 5 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 236/2026 | Mir Khan & Others VS The State | Muhammad Nisar(ADVO-304-SBC-SGR) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-498 | 16/2026 Mangli |
A.B.A called. All Applicants/accused are present on interim pre-arrest bail. Mr. Nisar Ahmed Advocate for applicants/accused and ADPP for the state are present. Notice is returned served upon complainant and returned served. Complainant is present and filed no objection affidavit. Order on it. File. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open Court. Interim pre-arrest bail earlier granted to applicants/accused is hereby confirmed on same terms and conditions with direction to co-operate with investigation officer of face the trial. Intimation be sent to concerned SHO, for information and compliance. |
| 6 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 248/2026 | Sher Muhammad & Others VS The State | Ashok Kumar (ADVO-791-SBC-SGR) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-498 | 11/2026 Chotiaryoon |
A.B.A called. All Applicants/accused are present on interim pre-arrest bail. Mr. Ashok Kumar Advocate for applicants/accused and ADPP for the state are present. Notice is returned served upon complainant and returned served. Complainant is present. Mr. Zafar Hayat advocate appeared and filed Vakalatnama on behalf of complainant. Order on it. File. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open Court. Interim pre-arrest bail earlier granted to applicants/accused is hereby confirmed on same terms and conditions with direction to co-operate with investigation officer of face the trial. Intimation be sent to concerned SHO, for information and compliance. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 7 | PPC 74/2025 | The State VS Nabi Dad and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Abdul Jabbar Panhwar(),Ghulam Hussain(ADVO-403-SBC-SGR),Parvez Ahmed(ADVO-676-SBC-SGR),Zafar Hayat(ADVO-404-SBC-SGR) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-324,PPC-353 | 267/2024 Sanghar |
Case called. Accused Nabi Dad, Ameerullah and Murad are present on bail. Accused Roshan is produced in custody from District Prison and Correctional facility Sanghar. Accused Faqeer Muhammad @ Faqeero, and Ghulam Hyder have already been declared as Proclaimed offenders. ADPP for the state is present. Mr. Parvez Ahmed Bugti advocate for accused Nabi Dad is present. Mr. Ghulam Hussain Baloch advocate for accused Muhammad Murad is presnet. Mr. Hussain Bux Chang advocate for accused Roshan is present. Process not return served or un-served. No Pws are present. Repeat summons to R/P.Ws. Call case property. Put off to 31.03.2026, for evidence. Accused Roshan is remanded back to custody. Present accused are directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 8 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 432/2026 | Fayaz Ahmed VS SSP Sanghar & Others | Iqrar Ali Panhwar(ADVO-581-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Crl. Misc Application called. Applicant is called absent and his counsel is present. Report is and In-charge SP complaint cell Sanghar. Order on it. Report not received from In-charge FIA. The advocate for applicant has filed withdrawal statement. Order passed and announced in open Court. The instant application U/S 22-A 6(i) Cr.P.C stands dismissed being withdrawn. |
|
| 9 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 433/2026 | Zafarrullah & another VS SSP Sanghar & Others | Iqrar Ali Panhwar(ADVO-581-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Crl. Misc Application called. Applicants and their counsel are present. Reports are received from SHO PS Khadro and In-charge SP complaint cell Sanghar. Order on it. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open Court. The instant application stands disposed off accordingly. |
|
| 10 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 449/2026 | Bahadur Khan VS SSP Sanghar & Others | Fida Hussain(ADVO-52149-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Crl. Misc Application called. Applicant and his counsel are present. Reports are received from SHO PS Sanghar and In-charge SP complaint cell Sanghar. Order on it. Proposed accused Siddique is voluntarily appeared. Mr. Muhammad Yaseen Khaskheli advocate, appeared and filed Vakalatnama on behalf of proposed accused named above. Order on it. File. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open Court. The respondent No.02 is directed to record statement of applicant as per his verbatim and if cognizable offence is made out the register F.I.R against proposed accused with these observation, application stands disposed of. |
|
| 11 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 450/2026 | Muhammad Hashim VS SSP Sanghar & Others | Fida Hussain(ADVO-52149-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I),Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Crl. Misc Application called. Applicant and his counsel are present. Reports are received from SHO PS Sanghar and In-charge SP complaint cell Sanghar. Order on it. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open Court. The instant application stands disposed off accordingly. |
|
| 12 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 448/2026 | Sikiladho VS SSP Sanghar & Others | Iqdad Ali(ADVO-53266-SBC-KHS) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Crl. Misc Application called. Applicant and his counsel are present. Reports are received from SHO PS Jhol and In-charge SP complaint cell Sanghar. Order on it. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open Court. The respondent No.02 is directed to record statement of applicant as per his verbatim and if cognizable offence is made out the register F.I.R against proposed accused persons, Consequently application stands allowed. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Statement of Accused | |||||||
| 13 | PPC 350/2025 | The State VS Allah Bachayo & others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Hussain Bux Mari(ADVO-483-SBC-SGR) | PPC-324,PPC-34,PPC-353 | 33/2025 Chotiaryoon |
Case called. Accused Allah Bachayo, Altaf and Gamshad are present on bail. Accused Mukhtiar is called absent and he has been declared as Proclaimed offender. Mr. Ali Ahmed Ansari ADPP for the state is present. Mr. Hussain Bux Mari advocate for accused Allah Bachayo and Gamshad is present. Mr. Abid Ali Qureshi for accused Altaf is present. Statement U/S 342 Cr.P.C of accused Allah Bachayo is recorded R&R at?????????????????????Ex.16. Statement U/s 342 Cr.P.C of accused Altaf is recorded R&R at??????.Ex.17. Statement U/s 342 Cr.P.C of accused Gamshad is recorded R&R at????????????EX.18. Final arguments heard. Judgment passed and announced in open Court at (Ex.19). Accused Allah Bachayo, Altaf and Gamshad have been acquitted U/S 265-H(i) Cr.P.c, they are present and bail bonds stands cancelled sureties discharged. However, the case against proclaimed offender namely Mukhtiar be kept on dormant file till his arrest and appearance. The office is directed to issue NBW against him for life time. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 14 | Forest/Wild Life Acts 21/2026 | The State VS Nakhat Singh & another | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-SGR) | Sindh Wildlife Preservation Conservation Act-2020-21 | 33/2025 Wild Life Sanghar |
Case called. Accused Nakhat Sindh and Hathi Sindh are called absent and shown in challan charge sheet Personal bond. I/O Asad Ali Mari Game officer is called absent. Notice issued against accused persons and returned un-served. Order on it. Repeat notice against accused persons through SHO P.S Khipro. Put off to 01.04.2026, for service. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION Compliance | |||||||
| 1 | Summary Suits 33/2025 |
Sawai Khan VS Ghulam Murtaza | Allah Bux Chang(ADVO-448-SBC-SGR) | Muhammad Zeeshan Rafique(ADVO-732-SBC-SGR) | Summary suit called. Attorney of Plaintiff and his counsel are present. Defendant and his counsel are present. The advocate for defendant has filed adjournment application at (Ex.15). Order on it. Allowed as prayed. Put off to 25.03.2026, for compliance U/O 10 Rule 2 CPC/ arguments on application U/O VII Rule 11 CPC. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 2 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 108/2025 |
Syed Ali Raza Shah & Others VS Syed Hizbullah Shah & Others | Muhammad Yaseen(ADVO-324-SBC-SGR) | Abdul Sattar (ADVO-292-SBC-MTY),DDA(DDA-0001-GOV-SGR),Sarfaraz Ahmed(ADVO-485-SBC-SGR) | Civil Appeal called. Appellant No.1 himself as well as Attorney of other appellants is called absent and his counsel is present. Attorney of respondents No.1 to 5 namely Ali Dino Shah and his Counsel Mr. Sarfraz Ahmed advocate are present. Respondent No,8,9 (a),11, 12 14, 17, 18, L.Rs respondent No.07 and 16 and their counsel Mr. Abdul Sattar advocate are called absent. Official respondents are called absent. Mr. Javed Ahmed DDA for official respondents is present. Respondent No.16 (C) and behalf of the respondent No. 16(a, b to g) e is called absent. L.Rs of respondent No. 10(b) Gulzar himself and on behalf respondent No.10 (c and d) is called absent and their counsel Mr. Ghulam Hussain Baloch is present. L.Rs of respondents No.07 is called absent. The learned counsel for appellant has filed statement alongwith publication in daily newspapers Kawish dated 05.03.2026 at (Ex.32). Order on it. File. Order passed on order sheet. The service against respondent No.07 is hereby ordered to be held good. Put off to 31.03.2026, for appearance of L.Rs of respondents No.7 |
||
| 3 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 113/2025 |
Syed Hizbullah Shah & Others VS Syed Ali Raza Shah & Others | Sarfaraz Ahmed(ADVO-485-SBC-SGR) | Abdul Sattar (ADVO-292-SBC-MTY),DDA(DDA-0001-GOV-SGR),Muhammad Yaseen(ADVO-324-SBC-SGR) | Civil Appeal Called. Attorney of appellant and his counsel are present. Respondent No.1 himself as well as attorney of respondent No.2 to 13 is called absent and his counsel Mr. Muhammad Yaseen advocate is present. Respondents No. 17(a),19, 22, 20, 25, 26, L.Rs of respondent No.15 and 24 and their counsel Mr. Abdul Sattar advocate are called absent. Official respondents are called absent. Mr. Javed Ahmed DDA for official respondents is present. L.Rs of Respondent No. 24(f) is called absent. L.Rs of respondent No. 18(b) Gulzar himself and on behalf respondent No.18 (c and d) is called absent and their counsel Mr. Ghulam Hussain Baloch is present. L.Rs of respondent No.15 are called absent. Notice/publication issued against L.Rs of respondent No.15 but not published. The learned counsel for appellant has requested for adjournment, his requested is allowed. Matter is adjourned in the interest of justice. Issue fresh notice/publication against L.Rs of respondent No.15 on costs. Put off to 31.03.2026, for service through publication upon L.Rs of respondents No.15 |
||
| 4 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 209/2025 |
Mst. Mumtaz Begum Since dead through her LRs VS Federation of Pakistan & Others | Tarique Mehboob(ADVO-165-SBC-SGR) | DDA(DDA-0001-GOV-SGR),Safdar Kamal(ADVO-1024-SBC-SUK) | Civil Appeal called. Appellant No.1 himself as well as attorney other appellants are called absent, his junior is present. Respondents No.1 to 4 are called absent. Mr. Safdar Kamal Law officer NADRA of respondent No.1 to 4 called absent, while Syed Waseem Natiq Assistant NADRA is present. Respondent No.5 called absent. Mr. Javed Ahmed DDA for official respondent No.4 is present. Notice/publication has been made but not received as yet. The junior advocate for appellant has filed an application for condonation that publication is published in daily newspapers Nawa-e-waqat Lahore dated 08.03.2026 at (Ex.09) Order on it. Allowed in the interest of justice. Put off to 31.03.2026, for service through publication upon respondents No. 6 & 7. |
||
| 5 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 2/2026 |
Ghulam Muhammad Since dead through his LRs & Others VS Muhammad Bux Since dead through his LRs & Others | Asad Jahangir(ADVO-401-SBC-SGR) | Asif Ali(ADVO-589-SBC-SGR),DDA(DDA-0001-GOV-SGR) | Civil Appeal called. Appellant No(b) himself as well as Attorney of other appellant and his counsel are present. L.Rs of respondent No.1(f) himself as well as attorney of other respondent No.(1), b & d to f and 2 and his counsel Mr. Asif Ali Jat are present. Respondent No.1(a) Mst Dadli has already been died. Official respondents are called absent. Mr. Javed Ahmed DDA for official respondent is present. Notice issued against L.Rs respondents No.1(c) and returned served upon him, as per endorsement of bailiff. L.Rs of respondent No.1(C) is present and filed an application for grant of time to engage an advocate at (Ex.12). Order on it. Allowed. Put off to 26.03.2026, for further proceedings. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Further Proceedings | |||||||
| 6 | Summary Suits 12/2026 |
Shabbir Ahmed VS Ghulam Sarwar | Sarfaraz Ahmed(ADVO-485-SBC-SGR) | Summary suit called. Plaintiff and his counsel are present. Defendant and his counsel are present. The advocate for defendant has filed an application u/O XXXVII Rule 3 CPC alongwith affidavit at (Ex.08 and Ex.10). Order on it. Notice to other side. He has also filed proposed written statement at (Ex.11). Order on it. Copy to other side. Copies are received others side. Put off to 25.03.2026, for arguments/objection on application U/O XXXVI Rule 3 CPC. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 7 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 55/2024 |
Meenhal Faqir VS Mst. Janat since dead through her LRs & Others | Muhammad Yaseen(ADVO-324-SBC-SGR) | DDA(DDA-0001-GOV-SGR),Jamsheed(ADVO-595-SBC-SGR) | Civil Appeal called. Attorney of appellant is called absent and his counsel is present. L.Rs of respondent No.1 (e) namely Bashir Hussain himself and he also attorney of other L.Rs of respondent No.1 is called absent and Mr. Jamshed Laghari advocate for L.Rs of respondent No.1 is present. Official respondents are called absent. Mr. Javed Ahmed DDA for official respondent is present. L.Rs of respondents No. 07(b) and J.L are called absent and their counsel Mr. Manzoor Ali Lashari advocate is present. L.Rs of respondent No. 7(a), (c) to 7(i) are called absent. The advocate for appellant has filed adjournment application at (Ex.36). Order on it. Allowed in the interest of justice. Put off to 03.04.2026, for arguments. |
||
| 8 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 255/2024 |
Muhammad Ali VS Arshad Ali Khan & Others | Naseer Ahmed(ADVO-701-SBC-SGR) | DDA(DDA-0001-GOV-SGR),Suneel(ADVO-346-SBC-SGR) | Civil Appeal called. L.Rs of Appellant Ali Muhammad himself as well as attorney other appellants and his counsel Mr. Naseer Ahmed are present. Respondent No.1 is called absent and his Counsel Mr. Suneel Kumar advocate is also called absent, his junior is present. Official respondents are called absent. Mr. Javed Ahmed DDA for official respondents is present. The advocate for appellant has filed adjournment application at (Ex.27). Order on it. Allowed as prayed. Put off to 31.03.2026, for arguments/objection on application U/S 41 Rule 27 C.P.C |
||
| 9 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 135/2025 |
Muhammad Muneer & Others VS Mst. Monaza Bibi & Others | Hasnain(ADVO-510-SBC-SGR) | DDA(DDA-0001-GOV-SGR),Syed Shabih Ul Hassnain (ADVO-763-SBC-SGR) | Civil Appeal called. Attorney of Appellants No.1 & 2 is called absent, while appellant No.3 is present and their Counsel is also present. Attorney of respondents No.1 to 3 and his counsel Mr. Syed Shabih-ul-Hassnain Kazmai advocate are called absent, his junior is presnet. Official respondents are called absent. Mr. Javed Ahmed DDA for official respondents is present. Further arguments heard. Judgment passed and announced in open Court at (Ex.12) The impugned Judgment Dated 28.07.2025 and Decree dated 29.07.2025 passed by the learned 2nd Senior Civil Judge, Sanghar are hereby maintained. Consequently, the Civil Appeal being devoid of merits is hereby dismissed, with no order as to costs. Let the decree be prepared accordingly. Office is directed prepared such decree at (Ex.13). Copy of Judgment and Decree alongwith Original R&PS be sent to concerned trial Court for information and compliance |
||
| 10 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 137/2025 |
Mst. Monaza Bibi & Others VS Muhammad Muneer & Others | Syed Shabih Ul Hassnain (ADVO-763-SBC-SGR) | DDA(DDA-0001-GOV-SGR),Hasnain(ADVO-510-SBC-SGR) | Civil Appeal called. Attorney of Appellant and his Counsel are called absent, his junior is present. Respondent No.03 is present and his counsel Mr. Husnain Nizamani is also present. Official respondent are called absent. Mr. Javed Ahmed DDA for official respondents is present. Respondent No.1, 2 and 4 to 7 are called absent and service against them has already been held good. Further argument???s heard. Judgment passed and announced in open Court at (Ex.13) The impugned Judgment Dated 28.07.2025 and Decree dated 29.07.2025 passed by the learned 2nd Senior Civil Judge, Sanghar are hereby maintained. Consequently, the Civil Appeal being devoid of merits is hereby dismissed, with no order as to costs. Let the decree be prepared accordingly. Office is directed prepared such decree at (Ex.14). Copy of Judgment and Decree alongwith Original R&PS be sent to concerned trial Court for information and compliance. |
||
| 11 | C.Rev. (Civil Revisions) 37/2025 |
Naseer Ahmed VS Mst. Monaza Bibi & Others | Syed Shabih Ul Hassnain (ADVO-763-SBC-SGR) | Civil Revision Application called. Applicant is present. One Faisal Asghar attorney of respondent No.1 to 3, and his Counsel Mr. Syed Shahbih ul Hassnain Kazmi Advocate are called absent, his junior is present. Further arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open Court. Civil Revision Application is found to be devoid of merit and is hereby dismissed. The impugned order dated 29.07.2025 passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge-II, Sanghar is maintained. There shall be no order as to costs. Copy of Order be sent to concerned trial Court for information and compliance. |
|||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 1 | F.A. (Family Appeals) 45/2025 | Aijaz Ali VS Mst. Zubaida & Others | Muhammad Yaseen(ADVO-324-SBC-SGR) | Rab Dino(ADVO-648-SBC-SGR) | Family Appeal-Section 14 of Family Court Act | Family Appeal called. Appellant is called absent and his counsel Mr. Muhammad Yaseen is present. Respondent No.1 and her counsel Mr. Rab Dino Mangrio advocate are present and filed adjournment application at (Ex.11). Order on it. Allowed as prayed. Put off to 31.03.2026, for arguments. |
|
| 2 | G.W. A. (G&W Appeals) 11/2025 | Mst. Sahib Khatoon VS Mumtaz Ali & Others | Muhammad Yaseen(ADVO-324-SBC-SGR) | Rab Dino(ADVO-648-SBC-SGR) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 47 (Guardian Appeal ) | Guardian Appeal called. Appellant is called absent and his counsel Mr. Muhammad Yasin is present. Attorney of opponent No.1 and her counsel Mr. Rab Dino Mangrio advocate are present ad filed adjournment application at (Ex.14). Order on it. Allowed as prayed. Put off to 31.03.2026, for arguments. |
|
| 3 | G.W. A. (G&W Appeals) 10/2025 | Aijaz Ali VS Public at Large | Muhammad Yaseen(ADVO-324-SBC-SGR) | Rab Dino(ADVO-648-SBC-SGR) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 47 (Guardian Appeal ) | Guardian Appeal called. Appellant called absent and his counsel Mr. Muhammad Yasin is present. Opponent No.02 and her counsel Mr. Rab Dino Mangrio advocate are present and filed adjournment application at (Ex.13). Order on it. Allowed as prayed. Put off to 31.03.2026, for arguments. |
|
| 4 | G.W. A. (G&W Appeals) 13/2025 | Mst. Darya Khatoon VS Public at Large | Muhammad Yaseen(ADVO-324-SBC-SGR) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 47 (Guardian Appeal ) | Guardian Appeal called. Applicant is called absent and her Counsel Mr. Muhammad Yasin advocate is present. Opponents are called absent. Partly arguments heard. Put off to 17.03.2026, for further arguments. |
||