| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 133/2026 | Mushtaque Ali VS The State | Ghulam Hussain(ADVO-403-SBC-SGR) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 12/2026 Sinjhoro |
Criminal bail Application called. Advocate for applicant/accused and ADPP for the State are present. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open Court. The bail is granted to applicant/accused subject to furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs:50,000/- (Fifty thousand rupees) and PR bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of this Court. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 2 | PPC 350/2025 | The State VS Allah Bachayo & others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Hussain Bux Mari(ADVO-483-SBC-SGR) | PPC-324,PPC-34,PPC-353 | 33/2025 Chotiaryoon |
Case called. Accused Allah Bachayo, Altaf and Gamshad are present on bail. Accused Mukhtiar is called absent and he has been declared as Proclaimed offender. ADPP for the state is present. Mr. Hussain Bux Mari advocate for accused Allah Bachayo and Gamshad is present and his junior Mr. Khadim Hussain advocate is present. Mr. Abid Ali Qureshi for accused Altaf is present. Process is retuned served. Complainant SIP Abdul Hakeem and I/O ASI Ghulam Rasool are present and examined. D/O complainant SIP Abdul Hakeem is recorded R&R at??????????????????????????????Ex.12. He has produced documents R&R at???(Ex.12/A to Ex.12/E), respectively. D/O I.O ASI Ghulam Rasool is recorded R&R at??????Ex.13. He has produced documents?????????. R&R at (Ex.13/A to 13/J) respectively. Case property is produced and returned back with direction to produce on next date of hearing. Repeat summons to R/P.Ws. Call case property. Put off to 19.2.2026, for evidence. Present accused are directed to attend. |
| 3 | PPC 379/2025 | The State VS Ali Muhammad and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Allah Bux Chang(ADVO-448-SBC-SGR) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-324,PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-Fi,PPC-337-H,PPC-504 | 27/2025 Mangli |
Case called. Accused Ali Muhammad, Ghulam Qadir @ Abdul Qadir, Nazar Muhammad @ Khuda Nazar, Wali Muhammad, Attaullah, Abdul Razzaque and Javed @ Muhammad Javed are present on bail. ADPP for the state is present. Mr. Allah Bux chang advocate for all accused is called absent, his junior is present. Process is return served. Complainant and P.Ws are present. Mr. Naeem Ahmed Rehmani advocate, for complainant is present. The Junior advocate for accused has filed adjournment application. The advocate for complainant has given no objection. Order on it. Allowed. Repeat summons to R/P.Ws. Call case property. Put off to 26.02.2026, for evidence. Present accused are directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 4 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 199/2026 | Panio Mal VS SSP Sanghar & Others | Insaf Ali(ADVO-628-SBC-SGR) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I),Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Criminal Misc Application called. Applicant and his Counsel are present. Reports are received from SHO PS Sanghar and In-charge SP complaint cell Sanghar. Order on it. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open Court. The application is disposed of accordingly. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Statement of Accused | |||||||
| 5 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 236/2025 | The State VS Roshan | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Abdul Jabbar Panhwar() | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 30/2025 Sinjhoro |
Case called. Accused Roshan is produced in custody from District Prison and correctional facility Sanghar. ADPP for the state is present. Mr. Hussain Bux Chang advocate for accused is present. The record shows this case is connected with main Sessions Case No.235/2025 Re-The State SV Zobair and others U/S 324,353,34 PPC, Crime No.28/2025, of P.S Sinjhoro, which case has been adjourned. Put off to 26.02.2026, for statement of accused/formal hearing. Accused is remanded back to custody. |
| 6 | PPC 235/2025 | The State VS Zubair & others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Abdul Jabbar Panhwar(),Ghulam Hussain(ADVO-403-SBC-SGR),Zafar Hayat(ADVO-404-SBC-SGR) | PPC-324,PPC-34,PPC-353 | 28/2025 Sinjhoro |
Case called. Accused Roshan is produced in custody from District Prison and correctional Facility Sanghar. Accused Muhammad Murad is present on bail. Accused Sajjad @ Shahzad @ Sarfaraz @ Ajay is called absent without any intimation or application. Accused Zubair has already been declared as proclaimed offender. ADPP for the state is present. Mr. Hussain Bux Chang advocate for accused Roshan is present. Mr. Zafar Hayat advocate for accused Sajjad @ Ajay is called absent. Mr. Ghulam Hussain Baloch advocate for accused Muhammad Murad is present. NBW against accused Sajjad @ Shahzad @ Sarfaraz @ Ajay and notice to his surety has been issued and returned un-served. Statement of Process server ASI Waseem Hyder is recorded R&R at???.Ex/16. He has produced NBW, Statement of two locality persons alongwith copies of their CNICs, endorsement of process sever and report of SHO at (Ex.16/A to Ex.16/E), respectively. Order passed on statement of process server. The accused Sajjad @ Shahzad @ Sarfaraz @ Ajay has been declared as proclaimed offender. Issue Proclamation U/S 87 Cr.P.C & Proclamation regarding attachment of property against above named accused U/S 88 Cr.P.C. Repeat notice to surety. Put off to 26.02.2026, for statement of accused/ compliance U/S 87 and 88 Cr.P.C. Present accused is directed to attend. Accused Roshan is remanded back to custody. |
| 7 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 234/2025 | The State VS Shamsuddin | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-SGR) | Rana Haseeb Sikander(ADVO-822-SBC-SGR),Syed Shabih Ul Hassnain (ADVO-763-SBC-SGR) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 102/2025 Sanghar |
Case called. Accused is present on bail. ADPP for state is present. Advocate for accused is present. Statement of accused U/s 342 Cr.P.C is recorded R&R at???????????????????????????????????????????????????Ex.09. Put off to 16.02.2026, for Final arguments. Accused is directed to attend. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For ex-parte proof. | |||||||
| 1 | Summary Suits 25/2025 |
Inayatullah Khan VS Asif Shafique | Gohar Ali Shah(ADVO-2949-SBC-KHP) | Summary suit called. Plaintiff and his counsel are present. Defendant is called absent, and he is already declared as ex-parte and debarred from proceedings. Witness Muhammad Riaz and SIP Muhammad Shafique are present. D/O Inayatullah Khan is recorded R&R at?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????.Ex.15 He has produced affidavit in ex-parte Proof evidence R&R at???Ex.15/A. He also produced photocopy of cheque dated 02.02.2025 at Ex.15/B. He has also produced Photo copy of memo dated 05.05.2025 and 15.08.2025 at (Ex.15/C and Ex.15/D), he has produced copy of CTC order dated 29.08.2025 R&R at (Ex.15/E), He has produced photo copy of agreement R&R at (Ex.15/F, Photo copy of FIR R&R at Ex.15/G. D/O Witness Muhammad Riaz is recorded R&R at???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????.Ex.16 He has produced affidavit in ex-parte proof evidence R&R at???..Ex.16/A. D/O SIP Muhammad Cacique is recorded R&R at???.Ex.17. He has produce documents R&R at (Ex.17/A to Ex.17/F) respectively. The advocate for plaintiff has filed side closed statement R&R at???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????..Ex.18. Order on it. File. Put off to 19.02.2026, for arguments. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Further Proceedings | |||||||
| 2 | Summary Suits 32/2025 |
Asim Ali VS Ahmed Khan | Muhammad Yaseen(ADVO-324-SBC-SGR) | Rab Dino(ADVO-648-SBC-SGR) | Summary suit is called. The plaintiff is called absent and his counsel is present. The defendant is absent and his counsel is present. The defendant not submitted surety. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open at (Ex.13). Resultantly suit of the plaintiff is partly decreed to the extend of recovery of Rs:40,00,000/- only with no order as to costs. Let decree be drawn at (Ex.14). |
||
| 3 | Summary Suits 38/2025 |
Mehboob Ali VS Falak Sher | Muhammad Tahir (ADVO-543-SBC-SGR) | Rab Dino(ADVO-648-SBC-SGR) | Summary suit Called. Plaintiff and his counsel are present. Defendant is called absent and his counsel Mr. Rab Dino Magrio advocate is present and filed application for extension of time to produce the surety at (Ex.08). Order on it. Judgment passed and announced in open Court at (Ex.09). Resultantly suit of the plaintiff is partly decreed to the extent of prayer clause (a) only, with no order as to costs. Let decree be drawn at (Ex.10). |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 4 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 201/2025 |
Akbar Ali & Others VS Muhammad Akram & Others | S. Shafqat Ali Shah Masoomi(ADVO-328-SBC-SUK) | DDA(DDA-0001-GOV-SGR) | Civil Appeal Called. Attorney of appellant is called absent and his counsel is present. L.Rs of respondent No.4(d) himself as well as attorney of respondent No.1,4(a,c,f,g to I) and next friend L.Rs of ( e) is present Mr. Bhagwan Das advocate for respondent No.1 ,4(d) and attorney of L.Rs of respondent No.4(a,c,e,f,g to I) is present. Official respondents are called absent. Mr. Javed Ahmed DDA for behalf of official respondents is present. Notice issued against respondents No.4 (B & J) and returned un-served, as endorsement of bailiff. The advocate for applicants has filed an application U/O 5 Rule 20 CPC for substitute service upon respondent No.2,3 and 4(b) and (j) by of publication any newspapers alongwith affidavit at (Ex.09 and Ex.10). Order passed on separate sheet. The instant application for substitute service is hereby allowed accordingly. Let the notice against respondent No.2,3 and 4(b) & (j) be issued through publication in Newspapers daily Nawai-e-Waqat Karachi on costs. Put off to 26.02.2026, for service through publication upon respondent No.2,3 and 4(b) & (j). |
||
| 5 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 5/2026 |
Khair Muhammad VS Abdul Latif Shah & Others | Insaf Ali(ADVO-628-SBC-SGR) | Civil Appeal Called. Appellant and his counsel are present. Official respondents are called absent. Mr. Javed Ahmed DDA for official respondents is present. Notice respondent No. 1 to 3, but not returned served or un-served. Repeat notice against respondents No.1 to 3, as already ordered. Put off to 18.02.2026, for service. |
|||
| 6 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 16/2026 |
Aijaz Ahmed VS Zafar Faqeer & Others | Insaf Ali(ADVO-628-SBC-SGR) | Civil Appeal called. Appellant is called absent and his counsel is present. Notice issued against respondent No.1 to 9 through bailiff and register post, and same is returned served upon respondent No.2 and 5 to 8, the respondent No.02 has received the notice on behalf of respondent No.1, as per endorsement of bailiff, but they are called absent. Notice not returned served or un-served upon respondent No.3,4 and 9. The advocate for appellant has filed statement alongwith postal receipt at (Ex.04). Order on it. File. Mr. Javed Ahmed DDA is present and filed memo of appearance on behalf of official respondents at (Ex.05). Order on it. File. Repeat notice against respondent No.1 & 2 by way of pasting on the outer door on the pointation of appellant and register Post A/D on costs. Put off to 21.02.2026, for service upon respondents No.1 & 2. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 7 | Summary Suits 6/2025 |
Muhammad Younis VS Tayyab Khan | Sarfaraz Ahmed(ADVO-485-SBC-SGR) | Muhammad Nisar(ADVO-304-SBC-SGR) | Summary suit Called. Plaintiff and his Counsel are present. Attorney Defendant and his counsel are present. The advocate for defendant has filed affidavit in evidence alongwith documents R&R at (Ex.31). Copy to other side. Copy received other side. The advocate for plaintiff has filed an application U/O 12 Rule 6 CPC alongwith affidavit at (Ex.32 and Ex. 33). Order on it. Advocate to be heard. Put off to 20.02.2026, for evidence defendant side/ advocate to be heard. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 8 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 132/2025 |
Muhammad Ali VS Akbar & Others | Suneel(ADVO-346-SBC-SGR) | Bhagwan Das (ADVO-692-SBC-SGR),DDA(DDA-0001-GOV-SGR) | Civil Appeal called. Appellant and his counsel are called absent, his junior is present. Respondent No.1 himself as well as attorney of respondent No.2 to 5 and his counsel Mr. Bhagwan Das advocate are present. Official respondent is called absent. Mr. Javed Ahmed DDA for official respondents is present. The junior advocate for appellant has filed adjournment application at Ex.18. Last and final chance. Allowed. Put off to 17.02.2026, for arguments. |
||
| 9 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 191/2025 |
Mst. Shagufta VS Muhammad Abid & Others | Abdul Aziz(ADVO-4826-SBC-HYD) | Aijaz Ali(ADVO-656-SBC-SGR),DDA(DDA-0001-GOV-SGR) | Civil Appeal called. Appellant is called absent and counsel her counsel is present. Attorney of respondent No.1 and his counsel Mr. Aijaz Ali Sanjrani are called absent. Official respondents are called absent. Mr. Javed Ahmed DDA for official respondents is present. The Appellant has filed adjournment application at (Ex.10). Order on it. Allowed as prayed. Put off to 25.02.2026, for arguments. |
||
| 10 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 197/2025 |
Altaf Hussian & Others VS Taj Muhammad & Others | Jamsheed(ADVO-595-SBC-SGR) | DDA(DDA-0001-GOV-SGR),Ghulam Murtaza(ADVO-400-SBC-SGR) | Civil Appeal called. Appellant No.4 himself as well as attorney of other appellants and his counsel are present. Attorney of respondent No.1 & 2 is called absent and his counsel Mr. Ghulam Murtaza Laghari advocate is called absent. Official respondents are called absent. Mr. Javed Ahmed DDA for Official respondents is present. The advocate for respondent No.1& 2 sent adjournment application on the ground that he is busy before Hon???able High Court Mirpurkhas at (Ex.10). Order passed thereon. Put off to 10.02.2026, for further arguments. |
||
| 11 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 18/2026 |
Babar Ali & Others VS Province of Sindh & Others | Muhammad Yaseen(ADVO-324-SBC-SGR) | DDA(DDA-0001-GOV-SGR),Syed Shahzad Hyder(ADVO-3453-SBC-HYD) | Civil Appeal called. Appellant No.1 is present, while other appellants are called absent and their counsel is present. Respondent No.1, 2, 4, 5 & 7 are called absent. Attorney of respondent No.6 Sikandar Ali and his counsel Mr. Syed Shahzad Hyder Shah are called absent. Respondent No.3 is present and filed Para-wise comments on behalf of respondent No.1 to 3 thought at (Ex.11). Order on it. File Copy to other side. Mr. Javed Ahmed DDA for official respondents is present and filed statement alongwith copy of order dated 20.01.2026 at (Ex.12). Order on it. File. R&PS is received from trial Court. Put off to 23.02.2026, for arguments. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 12 | Summary Suits 31/2024 |
Ghulam Sarwar VS Abdul Hameed | Sumaira(ADVO-814-SBC-SGR) | Kaleem Ullah (ADVO-669-SBC-SGR) | Summary suit Called. Plaintiff and his Counsel are present. Defendant and his Counsel are present. The advocate for defendant has filed an application U/S 151 CPC for recalled of witnesses/ reopening of cross-examination alongwith affidavit at (Ex.42 and Ex. 43). Order on it. Notice to other side. Copy received other side. Put off to 18.02.2026, for defendant side evidence/ objection on application U/S 151 CPC. |
||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 1 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 72/2025 | Mst. Nasreen Akhtar VS Public at Large | Suneel(ADVO-346-SBC-SGR) | Syed Shabih Ul Hassnain (ADVO-763-SBC-SGR) | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-372 | Succession Application called. Applicant and her Counsel are counsel are called absent. Report is received from Mukhtiarkar Taluka Sanghar at (Ex.20). Order on it. Opponent No.02 namely Lareb Zahra and opponent No.03 Areesha is called absent and her Counsel Mr. Syed Shabih ul Hussain Kazmi advocate is absent, his junior is present. The Junior advocate for applicant has filed adjournment application at (Ex.21). Order on it. Last and final chance Allowed. Put off to 17.02.2026, for objection on application U/O 1 Rule 10 CPC. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 2 | F.A. (Family Appeals) 1/2026 | Muhammad Abbas VS mst. Aneesa | Arshad Hussain(ADVO-288-SBC-MKS) | Muhammad Jahangir(ADVO-588-SBC-SGR) | Family Appeal-Section 14 of Family Court Act | Family appeal called. Appellant is called absent and his counsel is present. Respondent is called absent and her Counsel Mr. Muhammad Jahangir Qureshi is present. Partly arguments heard by the learned counsel for appellant side. The advocate for respondent has filed adjournment application at (Ex.08). Order on it. Allowed as prayed. Put off to 19.02.2026, for arguments. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Succession Miscellaneous Applications | |||||||
| 3 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 93/2025 | Muhammad Shafique VS Public at Large | Muhammad Nisar(ADVO-304-SBC-SGR) | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-372 | Succession Application called. Applicant and his counsel are present. Opponent No: 2 filed her affidavits wherein she given no objection to grant of succession application and she also give no objection on application U/O 32 Rule 3 CPC on behalf of minors (Ex:10 and Ex.11)). Order on it. Two persons namely Adil Hussain Basharat Hussain are present and they have also filed their affidavits in support of the contentions of applicant (Ex: 12 and Ex:13). Order on it. Arguments heard. Put off to 16.02.2026, for Orders. |
||