| Hearing Date | Diary | Status | Units / Application | Witness | Court |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17-DEC-2025 Restored (1) |
For Evidence | 0 | 0 | SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge I, Mirpurkhas | |
| 09-DEC-2025 Restored (1) |
This matter has been restored. F.C Suit called. The plaintiff is present. Learned counsel for plaintiff is present. Private defendants called absent. Learned counsel for private defendants called absent. Learned Deputy District Attorney (DDA) for the official defendant is present. Learned counsel for plaintiff filed application for adjournment at Ex.no.37. Order passed on seperate-sheet. As per order, the associate of learned counsel for the plaintiff moved application for adjournment on the ground of some documents to be produced. The record reveals that the suit of the plaintiff was earlier dismissed in non-prosecution vide order dated 22-8-2025 which was later on recalled upon application of the plaintiff side, vide order dated 19-11-2025 by this Court with direction to plaintiff side to lead their evidence and deposit cost of amount of Rs. 2000/- failing which any appropriate order shall be passed. Despite of such clear directions, the plaintiff side has filed instant adjournment application without any justification, nevertheless, the said adjournment application is allowed in the interest of justice with direction to plaintiff side to lead evidence and deposit the cost of amount of Rs.2000/- failing which any adverse order shall be passed. Put off to-----------------------------------------17-12-2025 for Evidence of plaintiff side. | For Evidence | 0 | 0 | SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge I, Mirpurkhas |
| 22-AUG-2025 |
F.C. Suit was called. The plaintiff called absent. Learned counsel for plaintiff called absent. Private Defendants called absent. Learned counsel for the private defendants is present. Learned Deputy District Attorney (DDA) for the official defendant is present. Record reveals that plaintiff failed to lead his evidence since long and today neither plaintiff nor his counsel appeared before this Court. Therefore, Order passed at Exh-36/- as per order, the suit of plaintiff is dismissed in non prosecution with no order as to cost. | For Evidence | 0 | 0 | SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge I, Mirpurkhas |
| 08-AUG-2025 |
F.C. Suit was called. The plaintiff called absent. Learned counsel for plaintiff called absent. Private Defendant No: 2 and 3 are present. Learned counsel for the private defendants called absent however, his junior counsel is present. Learned Deputy District Attorney (DDA) for the official defendant is present. Order passed on separate sheet, as per order, notice of caution to plaintiff side regarding to proceed the matter on next date of hearing. Put up on---------------22-08-2025 for evidence of plaintiff side. | For Evidence | 0 | 0 | SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge I, Mirpurkhas |
| 25-JUL-2025 |
Presiding officer is on earned leave. F.C. Suit was called. The plaintiff called absent. Learned counsel for plaintiff called absent. Private Defendant No: 2 and 3 called absent. Learned counsel for the private defendants called absent however, his office clerk is present. Learned Deputy District Attorney (DDA) for the official defendant is present. Put up on----------------------------08-08-2025 for evidence of plaintiff side. | For Evidence | 0 | 0 | SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge I, Mirpurkhas |
| 15-JUL-2025 |
Presiding officer is on casual leave. F.C. Suit was called. The plaintiff is present. Learned counsel for plaintiff called absent. Private Defendant No: 2 and 3 are present. Learned counsel for the private defendants called absent however, his office clerk is present. Learned Deputy District Attorney (DDA) for the official defendant is present. Put up on----------------------------25-07-2025 for evidence of plaintiff side. | For Evidence | 0 | 0 | SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge I, Mirpurkhas |
| 04-JUL-2025 |
F.C. Suit was called. The plaintiff called absent. Learned counsel for plaintiff called absent. Private Defendants called absent. Learned counsel for the private defendants is present. Learned Deputy District Attorney (DDA) for the official defendant is present. Order passed on separate sheet, as per order, notice of caution to plaintiff side to record evidence. Put up on---------------15-07-2025 for evidence of plaintiff side. | For Service | 0 | 0 | SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge I, Mirpurkhas |
| 30-MAY-2025 |
F.C. Suit was called. The plaintiff called absent. Learned counsel for plaintiff called absent. Private Defendants called absent. Learned counsel for the private defendants called absent while his office clerk is present. Learned Deputy District Attorney (DDA) for the official defendant is present. Order passed 35/- as per order, application under order 16 rule 1 & 2 CPC is allowed. Put up on------04-07-2025 for evidence of plaintiff side. | For Hearing of Applications | 0 | 0 | SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge I, Mirpurkhas |
| 16-MAY-2025 |
F.C. Suit was called. The plaintiff is present. Learned counsel for plaintiff called absent. Private Defendants called absent. Learned counsel for the private defendants sent application for adjournment through his office clerk at Exh-34/- order on it. Allowed. Learned Deputy District Attorney (DDA) for the official defendant is present. Matter is put up on------30-05-2025 for hearing on the application under Order 16, Rule 1 & 2 CPC/Evidence of plaintiff side. | For Hearing of Applications | 0 | 0 | SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge I, Mirpurkhas |
| 02-MAY-2025 |
Presiding officer is on casual leave. F.C. Suit was called. The plaintiff is present. Learned counsel for plaintiff called absent. Private Defendants No. 2 and 3 are present. Learned counsel for the private defendants called absent while his junior counsel is present. Learned Deputy District Attorney (DDA) for the official defendant is present. Matter is put up on------16-05-2025 for hearing on the application under Order 16, Rule 1 & 2 CPC. | For Hearing of Applications | 0 | 0 | SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge I, Mirpurkhas |