| Hearing Date | Diary | Status | Units / Application | Witness | Court |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20-APR-2026 |
For W/S/Objections/C.A. | 0 | 0 | SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Shahdadkot | |
| 06-APR-2026 |
Suit called. Plaintiff No.1 is present, plaintiff No.2 is called absent, however, their learned counsel is called present. Defendant NO. 01 is present and filed objections and w/stt order on it, copy to to other side. Advocate for defendant No.1 filed application u/o 7 rule 11 CPC along with affidavit of defendant No.1 order on it, copy to other side. Defendants No.4 to 6, 8, 9 and 11 are already served but called absent and not yet filed WS/ Objections. Learned DDA is present on behalf of official defendants. Put off to 20-04-2026, for filing an proper application for defendant No.7, WS/Objections of defendants No.2 to 6, 8, 9 and 11 and filling objections on application 7 rule 11 CPC. | For W/S/Objections/C.A. | 0 | 0 | SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Shahdadkot |
| 13-MAR-2026 |
The matter was fixed on 13-03-2026, which was subsequently declared a public holiday. Today, 16-03-2026, the case was called. Plaintiff No. 1 is present, whereas Plaintiff No. 2 is absent, and their learned counsel is also absent. Defendant No. 1 is present, and Mr. Akhtar Ali Lak, Advocate, filed a vakalatnama on his behalf, which is kept on record. DDA is present and filed a memo of appearance on behalf of the official defendants, which is also kept on record. DSP/SDP Mirokhan, Defendant No. 10, submitted a written statement, which is kept on record. The remaining official defendants are absent. Matter is adjourned to 06-04-2026 for filing of written statements by the defendants. | For W/S/Objections/C.A. | 0 | 0 | SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Shahdadkot Holiday: Holiday for Jumat-ul-Wida, Ramzan 2026 |
| 04-MAR-2026 |
Suit called. Plaintiff No.1 is present, plaintiff No.2 is called absent, however, their learned counsel is called present. Defendant NO. 01 is present and & submitted adjournment application which is granted. Defendants No.4 to 6, 8, 9 and 11 are already served but called absent and not yet filed WS/ Objections. Learned DDA is present on behalf of official defendants. Put off to 13-03-2026, for filing an proper application for defendant No.7, WS/Objections of defendants No.1,2 to 6, 8, 9 and 11. | For W/S/Objections/C.A. | 0 | 0 | SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Shahdadkot |
| 16-FEB-2026 |
Matter called. Plaintiff No.1 is present, plaintiff No.2 is called absent, however, their learned counsel is called absent. Defendant NO. 01 is present and & submitted adjournment application which is granted. Defendants No.4 to 6, 8, 9 and 11 are already served but called absent and not yet filed WS/ Objections. Learned DDA is present on behalf of official defendants. Advocate for plaintiff submitted statement along with court fee stamps which are kept on record. Put off to 04-03-2026, for filing an application for defendant No.7, WS/Objections of defendants No.1,2 to 6, 8, 9 and 11. | For W/S/Objections/C.A. | 0 | 0 | SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Shahdadkot |
| 06-FEB-2026 |
Matter called. Plaintiff No.1 is present, plaintiff No.2 is called absent, their counsel is present. Process issued returned served upon defendant NO.1 defendant NO.1 is present and submitted adjournment application along with affidavit which is granted. The service of defendant NO.1 is held good. Defendants No.4 to 6, 8, 9 and 11 are already served but called absent and not yet filed WS/ Objections. Learned DDA is present and already stated that plaintiffs made party to Sub-Registrar Miro Khan as defendant No.7 but in Sub-Division Miro Khan there exist no any office of Sub-Registrar. Defendant No.2 (Tapedar Deh Laskhar Khan) has appeared in person and stated that he has also charge of Supervising Tapedar, Tapa Muhammad Gujrani, Taluka Sijawal Junejo (defendant No.3). No other defendant is in attendance. The requisite Court Fees not yet provided by learned counsel for plaintiffs. Put off to 16.02.2026, for filing an application for defendant No.7, WS/Objections of defendants No.1,2 to 6, 8, 9 and 11. | For Service | 0 | 0 | SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Shahdadkot |
| 20-JAN-2026 |
Matter called. Plaintiff No.1 is present, plaintiff No.2 is absent, their counsel is present. Defendants No.4 to 6, 8, 9 and 11 are already served on 20.12.2025 but called absent and not yet filed WS/ Objections. Process issued upon defendants No.1 to 3, returned served upon defendants No.2 and 3, while process upon defendant No.1 returned unserved, as per endorsement of bailiff. Learned DDA is present and already stated that plaintiffs made party to Sub-Registrar Miro Khan as defendant No.7 but in Sub-Division Miro Khan there exist no any office of Sub-Registrar. Defendant No.2 (Tapedar Deh Laskhar Khan) appeared in person and stated that he has also charge of Supervising Tapedar, Tapa Muhammad Gujrani, Taluka Sijawal Junejo (defendant No.3). No other defendant is in attendance. Learned DDA filed Memo of Appearance on behalf of official defendants No.2, 3 and 10. The Service held good against defendants No.2, 3 and 10. The requisite Court Fees not yet provided by learned counsel for plaintiffs but He filed an Application U/S.148 CPC for extension of time. Order on it. Condoned, as last and final chance. Put off to 06.02.2026, for Service, filing an application for defendant No.7, WS/Objections of defendants No.2 to 6, 8, 9 and 11. Issue process upon defendant No.1 through bailiff by way of pasting and registered A.D. | For Service | 0 | 0 | SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Shahdadkot |
| 20-DEC-2025 |
Matter called. Plaintiff No.1 is present, plaintiff No.2 is absent, their counsel is present. Process issued upon defendants No.1 to 7, 9 & 10 and same is returned served upon defendants No.4 to 6, 8 & 9, while process upon defendants No.1 to 3, 7 and 10 returned unserved, as per endorsement of bailiff. Process also issued upon defendants No.6 & 11 but reply of same not yet returned and even no receipt of A.D presented by counsel for plaintiffs. The MCO to ZTBL Miro Khan Branch appeared on behalf of defendant No.8 and filed adjournment application with affidavit. Order on it. Allowed. Learned DDA is appeared and filed Memo of Appearance on behalf of official defendants No.4 to 6, 9 & 11. Order on it. File. DDA also stated that plaintiffs made party to Sub-Registrar Miro Khan as defendant No.7 but in Sub-Division Miro Khan there exist no any office of Sub-Registrar. The Service held good against defendants No.4 to 6, 8, 9 & 11. The requisite court fee not yet provided by learned counsel for plaintiffs but He filed an Application U/S.148 CPC for extension of time. Order on it. Condoned. Put off to 20.01.2026, for Service, filing an application for defendant No.7, WS/Objections of defendants No.4 to 6, 8, 9 & 11. Repeat summons upon defendant No.1 to 3 & 10 through bailiff and registered A.D, as already ordered. | For Service | 0 | 0 | SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Shahdadkot |