07-APR-2026
|
|
For Evidence |
0 |
0 |
ADJ -II, Sanghar
|
24-MAR-2026
|
The case called. Accused Muhammad Aslam is produced in custody from District Prison, Sanghar through video link. Accused Jawan is produced in custody through video link from Central Prison, Hyderabad. Accused Nangar, Malhar, Sher Muhammad @ Sheru and Attur are present on bail. ADPP for the state, Mr. Wajid Ali Khaskheli learned defence counsel for accused Muhammad Aslam, Mr. Tarique Mehboob defence counsel for accused Nangar and Attur, Mr. Mir Mal Oad defence counsel for accused appointed on state expenses, Mr. Muhammad Sharif Misrani defence counsel for accused Jawan, Malhar and Sher Muhammad and Mr. Housh Muhammad Mangi counsel for complainant are present. Complainant is present and Complainant directed to attend. Repeat summons to the remaining PWs and call case property. Court is lying vacant. Put off to: 07.04.2026 for evidence. Next date communicated through video link for accused Jawan and Muhammad Aslam. Present accused Nangar, Malhar, Sher Muhammad @ Sheru and Attur are directed to attend. |
For Evidence |
0 |
0 |
ADJ -I, Sanghar
|
06-MAR-2026
|
The case called. Accused Muhammad Aslam is produced in custody from District Prison, Sanghar through video link. Accused Jawan is produced in custody through video link from Central Prison, Hyderabad. Accused Nangar, Malhar, Sher Muhammad @ Sheru and Attur are present on bail. ADPP for the state, Mr. Wajid Ali Khaskheli learned defence counsel for accused Muhammad Aslam, Mr. Tarique Mehboob defence counsel for accused Nangar and Attur, Mr. Mir Mal Oad defence counsel for accused appointed on state expenses and Mr. Housh Muhammad Mangi counsel for complainant are present. Mr. Muhammad Sharif Misrani defence counsel for accused Jawan, Malhar and Sher Muhammad is called absent. Complainant is present. Complainant directed to attend. Repeat summons to the remaining PWs and call case property. Court is lying vacant. Put off to: 24.03.2026 for evidence. Next date communicated through video link for accused Jawan and Muhammad Aslam. Present accused Nangar, Malhar, Sher Muhammad @ Sheru and Attur are directed to attend. |
For Evidence |
0 |
0 |
ADJ -I, Sanghar
|
20-FEB-2026
|
The case called. Accused Muhammad Aslam is produced in custody from District Prison, Sanghar through video link. Accused Jawan is produced in custody through video link from Central Prison, Hyderabad. Accused Nangar, Malhar, Sher Muhammad @ Sheru and Attur are present on bail. ADPP for the state, Mr. Wajid Ali Khaskheli learned defence counsel for accused Muhammad Aslam, Mr. Mir Mal Oad defence counsel for accused appointed on state expenses, Mr. Muhammad Sharif Misrani defence counsel for accused Jawan, Malhar and Sher Muhammad, Mr. Tarique Mehboob defence counsel for accused Nangar and Attur and Mr. Housh Muhammad Mangi counsel for complainant are present. Complainant is present. Complainant directed to attend. Repeat summons to the remaining PWs and call case property. Court is lying vacant. Put off to: 06.03.2026 for evidence. Next date communicated through video link for accused Jawan and Muhammad Aslam. Present accused Nangar, Malhar, Sher Muhammad @ Sheru and Attur are directed to attend. |
For Evidence |
0 |
0 |
ADJ -I, Sanghar
|
06-FEB-2026
|
The case called. Accused Muhammad Aslam is produced in custody through video link. Accused Nangar, Malhar, Sher Muhammad @ Sheru and Attur are present on bail. Accused Jawan is produced in custody through video link from Central Prison, Hyderabad. Mr. Jamaluddin Baladi ADPP for the state, Mr. Wajid Ali Khaskheli learned defence counsel for accused, Mr. Mir Mal Oad defence counsel for accused appointed on state expenses, Mr. Muhammad Sharif Misrani defence counsel for accused Jawan, Mr. Tarique Mehboob defence counsel for accused Nangar and Attur and Mr. Housh Muhammad Mangi counsel for complainant are present. Complainant along with one private PW is present. P.O is under transfer. To come up on 20.02.2026 for recording evidence of Pws as per law. Issue BWs against the remaining PWs as ordered earlier and call case property. Complainant and present PW are directed to appear on next date for recording their evidence as per law. Concerned jail authorities are directed to produce accused Jawan and Muhammad Aslam again through video link on next date. Present accused are directed to attend.
|
For Evidence |
0 |
0 |
ADJ -I, Sanghar
|
23-JAN-2026
|
The case called. Accused Muhammad Aslam is produced in custody through video link. Accused Nangar, Malhar, Sher Muhammad @ Sheru and Attur are present on bail. Accused Jawan is produced in custody through video link from Central Prison, Hyderabad. Mr. Jamaluddin Baladi ADPP for the state, Mr. Mir Mal Oad defence counsel for accused appointed on state expenses, Mr. Muhammad Sharif Misrani defence counsel for accused Jawan, Mr. Tarique Mehboob defence counsel for accused Nangar and Attur and Mr. Housh Muhammad Mangi counsel for complainant are present. Mr. Wajid Ali Khaskheli learned defence counsel for accused called absent without any intimation despite several calls though he was also called absent on 06.12.2023, 28.12.2023, 15.01.2024, 23.02.2024, 06.04.2024, 17.05.2024, 07.06.2024, 12.07.2024, 30.08.2024, 20.09.2024, 12.10.2024, 01.11.2024, 22.11.2024, and recently on 08.11.2025, 22.11.2025, 13.12.2025 and 18.12.2025. Today he is again called absent without any intimation despite several calls. Mr. Muhammad Sharif Misrani defence counsel for accused Jawan and Mr. Tarique Mehboob defence counsel for accused Nangar and Attur sought adjournment and filed such applications. Order passed thereon. Copy thereof has been supplied to learned counsel for complainant and learned ADPP for the state. This is an old case and merit expeditious disposal on merits as per law. Adjourned as a last and final chance with the same direction and caution. Charge in this case was framed on 15.03.2024. Case file is full of adjournment applications filed by either side and case was adjourned mostly due to absence of learned defence counsel who sought adjournments. Complainant along with two private PWs one official PW is present and returned un-examined due to filing of adjournment applications and absence of learned defence counsel Mr. Wajid Ali Khaskheli. By consent case is adjourned. To come up on 06.02.2026 for recording evidence of Pws as per law. Issue BWs against the remaining PWs as ordered earlier and call case property. Complainant and present PWs are directed to appear on next date for recording their evidence as per law. Concerned jail authorities are directed to produce accused Jawan and Muhammad Aslam again through video link on next date. Present accused are directed to attend. |
For Evidence |
0 |
0 |
ADJ -I, Sanghar
|
30-DEC-2025
|
The case called. Accused Muhammad Aslam is produced in custody through video link. Accused Nangar, Malhar, Sher Muhammad @ Sheru and Attur are present on bail. Accused Jawan is produced in custody through video link from Central Prison, Hyderabad. Mr. Ali Ahmed Ansari ADPP for the state and Mr. Mir Mal Oad advocate appointed on state expenses is present. Mr. Muhammad Sharif Misrani advocate send vakalatnama on behalf of accused Jawan, which is taken on record. Mr. Asif Ali Jat advocate appeared, who files vakalatnama of his senior advocate Mr. Tarique Mehboob on behalf of accused Nangar and Attur and sought adjournment. Charge in this case was framed on 15.03.2024. Case file is full of adjournment applications filed by either side and case was adjourned mostly due to absence of learned defence counsel Mr. Wajid Ali Khaskheli, who sought adjournment on 15.11.2023, and he was called absent on 06.12.2023, 28.12.2023, 15.01.2024, 23.02.2024, 06.04.2024, 17.05.2024, 07.06.2024, 12.07.2024, 30.08.2024, 20.09.2024, 12.10.2024, 01.11.2024, 22.11.2024, and recently on 08.11.2025, 22.11.2025 and 13.12.2025. Today he appeared and stated at Bar to proceed case on next date without fail despite fact that accused engaged other counsel Mr. Tarique Mehboob and Mr. Muhammad Sharif Asif Misrani. Adjourned as last chance with directions to proceed case on next date. Mr. Muhammad Sharif Misrani defence counsel called absent several calls since morning till 10:15 AM. Complainant along with two PWs and his counsel is present. Mr. Wahid Ali Khaskheli also present on second call but he refused to file adjournment that adjournment application filed by another counsel is sufficient. By consent case is adjourned. To come up on 23.01.2025 for recording evidence of Pws as per law. Issue BWs against the PWs as ordered earlier and call case property. Complainant and present PWs are directed to appear on next date for recording their evidence as per law. Concerned jail authorities are directed to produce accused Jawan and Muhammad Aslam again through video link on next date. Present accused are directed to attend.
|
For Evidence |
0 |
0 |
ADJ -I, Sanghar
|
18-DEC-2025
|
The case called. Accused Muhammad Aslam is produced in custody through video link. Accused Nangar, Malhar, Sher Muhammad @ Sheru and Attur are present on bail. Accused Jawan is produced in custody through video link from Central Prison, Hyderabad. Mr. Jamaluddin Baladi ADPP for the state and Mr. Housh Muhammad Mangi advocate for complainant are present. Mr. Mir Mal Oad advocate appointed on stat expenses is present. Mr. Wajid Ali Khaskheli advocate for accused called absent, but his co-counsel is present. Mr. Muhammad Sharif Misrani advocate also appeared, filed vakalatnama for accused Malhar Khan and Sher Muhammad @ Sheru and also sought adjournment. Complainant along with two private PWs is present. No other PWs are present. Per file in hand charge in this case was framed on 15.03.2024, but no single witness has been got examined as yet, which causes delay in expeditious trial and timely decision of the proceedings. The file in hand is full of adjournments filed by defence counsel for accused. The case is hand is marked as an old one. The Hohourable, High Court of Sindh, Karachi as per letter received from Honourable, District & Sessions Judge, Sanghar vide No. DJ SGR: No. 14383/2025 Sanghar Dated 02.12.2025 ordered to decide such cases expeditiously by fixing twice in a week. By consent case is adjourned. To come up on 30.12.2025 for recording evidence of Pws as per law. Issue BWs against the PWs as ordered earlier and call case property. Complainant and present PWs are directed to appear on next date for recording their evidence as per law. Learned ADPP for state, learned counsel for complainant, learned advocate appointed on state expense and both learned defence counsel are strictly directed to proceed the case on next date as per law. Concerned jail authorities are directed to produce accused Muhammad Aslam again through video link on next date. Present accused are directed to attend. |
For Evidence |
0 |
0 |
ADJ -I, Sanghar
|
13-DEC-2025
|
The case called. Accused Muhammad Aslam is produced in custody through video link. Accused Nangar, Malhar, Sher Muhammad @ Sheru and Attur are present on bail. Accused Jawan is produced in custody through video link from Central Prison, Hyderabad. Mr. Jamaluddin Baladi ADPP for the state and Mr. Housh Muhammad Mangi advocate for complainant are present. Mr. Wajid Ali Khaskheli advocate for accused called absent, but his co-counsel Mr. Abdul Ghaffar Khaskheli advocate is present, who sought adjournment and filed such application. Order passed thereon. Complainant is present. No other PWs are present. Per file in hand charge in this case was framed on 15.03.2024, but no single witness has been got examined as yet, and the learned defence counsel avoided and failed to proceed the case despite ample opportunity, this court???s direction as well as last chance from time to time, which caused delay and this case is therefore marked as an old one. The Hohourable, High Court of Sindh, Karachi as per letter received from Honourable, District & Sessions Judge, Sanghar vide No. DJ SGR: No. 14383/2025 Sanghar Dated 02.12.2025 ordered to decide such cases expeditiously by fixing twice in a week. Case in hand is full of adjournment applications, filed by the either parties, today learned defence counsel Mr. Wajid Ali Khaskheli as usual have been called absent and sent his junior from Hyderabad only to seek adjournment, which under the attending circumstances is mockery of law. As such this court finds no further legal way except to appoint Mr. Mir Mal Oad advocate for defence of accused on state expenses as per Action Document March 2019 and concept of fair trial, with last opportunity and chance to the learned defence counsel for accused through his junior council present in court today to proceed case on next date as per law and in case of failure the learned counsel appointed on state expense by this court today shall proceed case. Accused present in Court are strictly directed to produce their defence counsel on next date without fail. To come up on 18.12.2025 for recording evidence of Pws as per law. Issue BWs against the PWs and call case property. Complainant is directed to produce his complete set of private Pws on next date for recording their evidence as per law. Concerned jail authorities are directed to produce accused Muhammad Aslam again through video link on next date. Present accused are directed to attend. |
For Evidence |
0 |
0 |
ADJ -I, Sanghar
|
22-NOV-2025
|
The case called. Accused Muhammad Aslam is produced in custody through video link. Accused Nangar, Malhar, Sher Muhammad @ Sheru and Attur are present on bail. Accused Jawan is not produced in custody through video link from Central Prison, Hyderabad. Mr. Jamaluddin Baladi ADPP for the state and Mr. Housh Muhammad Mangi advocate for complainant are present. Mr. Wajid Ali Khaskheli advocate for accused called absent, but his co-counsel Mr. Abdul Ghaffar Khaskheli advocate is present and sought adjournment. Order passed thereon. Adjourned with direction to proceed case on next date as per law. Complainant is present. No other PWs are present. Complainant also sought adjournment and filed such application. Order passed thereon. Taken on record with direction to complainant to produce his private PWs on next date as per law. Per file in hand charge in this case was framed on 13th March, 2024 but no single Pw has got examined as yet, both parties have been avoiding to adduced evidence, which causes delay in smooth and expeditious trial in proceedings. As such the learned ADPP for state, learned counsel for complainant as well as learned defence counsel for accused are strictly directed to proceed case on next date as per law. By consent case is adjourned. To come up on 13.12.2025 for recording evidence of Pws. Repeat process against the PWs as ordered earlier and call complete case property. Concerned jail authorities are directed to produce accused Muhammad Aslam again through video link on next date. Present accused are directed to attend. |
For Evidence |
0 |
0 |
ADJ -I, Sanghar
|