17-SEP-2026
|
|
For Final Arguments |
0 |
0 |
ADJ I, Hyderabad
|
16-SEP-2026
|
Work suspended by District Bar Association. Case called. Accused Shafquat Umrani is produced by jail authorities. Accused Liaquat Umrani is absent his counsel filed application for condonation a/w 540 Cr.PC. Order on it. The proceeding against accused Meeral has already been abated. ADPP for the State is present. Mr. Syed Tarique Ahmed Shah advocate for accused Shafquat Umrani is present. Mr. Hashim Laghari advocate for accused Liaquat is absent, however his associate is present. Mr. Sahib Khan Panhwar advocate on behalf of P.W Nayab Umrani is absent; however, his associate is present and filed adjournment application. Order on it. Case adjourn to 17.09.2026 at 12:00 p.m, for further proceedings/further comparison of the video of evidence with the written evidence of PW- Nayab Umrani. |
For Final Arguments |
0 |
0 |
ADJ I, Hyderabad
|
15-SEP-2026
|
P.O is on casual leave. Case called. Accused Shafquat Umrani is produced by jail authorities. Accused Liaquat Umrani is absent his counsel filed application for condonation a/w 540 Cr.PC. Order on it. The proceeding against accused Meeral has already been abated. ADPP for the State is present. Mr. Syed Tarique Ahmed Shah advocate for accused Shafquat Umrani is absent, associate is present. Mr. Hashim Laghari advocate for accused Liaquat is absent, however his associate is present. Mr. Sahib Khan Panhwar advocate on behalf of P.W Nayab Umrani is present. Put off to 16.09.2026, for further proceedings/further comparison of the video of evidence with the written evidence of PW- Nayab Umrani. |
For Final Arguments |
0 |
0 |
ADJ I, Hyderabad
|
10-SEP-2026
|
Case called. Accused Shafquat Umrani is produced by jail authorities. Accused Liaquat Umrani is absent his counsel filed application for condonation a/w 540 Cr.PC. No objection given by advocate for accused Shafqat Umrani. and learned ADPP for state. Order passed on it. Condoned. The proceeding against accused Meeral has already been abated. ADPP for the State is present. Mr. Syed Tarique Ahmed Shah advocate for accused Shafquat Umrani is present. Mr. Hashim Laghari advocate for accused Liaquat is absent, however his associate is present. Mr. Sahib Khan Panhwar advocate on behalf of P.W Nayab Umrani is present. In compliance of order dated 23.06.2026 passed by Honorable Supreme Court of Pakistan in Cr.P..No.1033 and 1036 of 2024, Cr. Misc. Application No.1207/2024 in Crl. P.L.A.No.1033/2024 the process of comparing the video recording of the statement of P.W/petitioner Nayyab Umrani with her written statement was started in presence of learned counsel for the accused, learned counsel for P.W Nayyab and learned ADPP for the State. Order passed on separate sheet. Memorandum prepared. Put off to 15.09.2026, for further proceedings/further comparison of the video of evidence with the written evidence of PW- Nayab Umrani. |
For Final Arguments |
0 |
0 |
ADJ I, Hyderabad
|
09-SEP-2026
|
Case called. Accused Shafquat Umrani is produced by jail authorities. Accused Liaquat Umrani is absent his counsel filed application for condonation a/w 540 Cr.PC. No objection given by advocate for accused Shafqat Umrani and counsel for PW- Nayab as well as learned ADPP for state. Order passed on it. Condoned. The proceeding against accused Meeral has already been abated. ADPP for the State is present. Mr. Syed Tarique Ahmed Shah advocate for accused Shafquat Umrani is present. Mr. Hashim Laghari advocate for accused Liaquat is absent, however his associate is present. Mr. Sahib Khan Panhwar advocate on behalf of P.W Nayab Umrani is present. Heard on appl: for calling recorded video of PW-9 Mst Nayab form E-Court Islamabad. Order passed on separate sheet. Instant application is dismissed. Today he also filed objection on the un-availability of sequences of video. Order passed on it. In compliance of order dated 23.06.2026 passed by Honorable Supreme Court of Pakistan in Cr.P..No.1033 and 1036 of 2024, Cr. Misc. Application No.1207/2024 in Crl. P.L.A.No.1033/2024 the process of comparing the video recording of the statement of P.W/petitioner Nayyab Umrani with her written statement was started in presence of learned counsel for the accused, learned counsel for P.W Nayyab and learned ADPP for the State. Order passed on separate sheet. Memorandum prepared. Put off to 10.09.2026, for further proceedings/further comparison of the video of evidence with the written evidence of PW- Nayab Umrani. |
For Final Arguments |
0 |
0 |
ADJ I, Hyderabad
|
08-SEP-2026
|
Case called. Accused Shafquat Umrani is produced by jail authorities. Accused Liaquat Umrani is absent his counsel filed application for condonation and u/s 540 Cr.PC. Order passed on it. Mr. Sahib Khan Panhwar advocate for PW-7 is absent and send application through associate for calling recorded video of PW-9 Mst Nayab form E-Court Islamabad a/w adjournment application. Order on it. Adjournment allowed. The proceeding against accused Meeral has already been abated. ADPP for the State is present. Mr. Syed Tarique Ahmed Shah advocate for accused Shafquat Umrani is present. Mr. Hashim Laghari advocate for accused Liaquat is absent, however his associate is present. Case is adjourned to 09.09.2026, for further proceedings/further comparison of the video of evidence with the written evidence of PW- Nayab Umrani. |
For Final Arguments |
0 |
0 |
ADJ I, Hyderabad
|
07-SEP-2026
|
Case called. Accused Shafquat Umrani is produced by jail authorities. Accused Liaquat Umrani is absent his counsel filed application for condonation and u/s 540 Cr.PC. Counsel for accused Shafqat and counsel for PW-7 given no objection. The proceeding against accused Meeral has already been abated. ADPP for the State is present. Mr. Syed Tarique Ahmed Shah advocate for accused Shafquat Umrani is present. Mr. Hashim Laghari advocate for accused Liaquat is absent, however his associate is present. Mr. Sahib Khan Panhwar advocate on behalf of P.W Nayab Umrani is present. Case is adjourned to 08.09.2026, for further proceedings/further comparison of the video of evidence with the written evidence of PW- Nayab Umrani. |
For Final Arguments |
0 |
0 |
ADJ I, Hyderabad
|
03-SEP-2026
|
Case called. Accused Shafquat Umrani is produced by jail authorities. Accused Liaquat Umrani is present on bail. The proceeding against accused Meeral has already been abated. ADPP for the State is present. Mr. Syed Tarique Ahmed Shah advocate for accused Shafquat Umrani is absent his associate is present. Mr. Hashim Laghari advocate for accused Liaquat is absent, however his associate is present. Mr. Sahib Khan Panhwar advocate on behalf of P.W Nayab Umrani is present. Case is adjourned to 07.09.2026, for further proceedings/further comparison of the video of evidence with the written evidence of PW- Nayab Umrani. |
For Final Arguments |
0 |
0 |
ADJ I, Hyderabad
|
02-SEP-2026
|
Case called. Accused Shafquat Umrani is produced by jail authorities. Accused Liaquat Umrani is present on bail. The proceeding against accused Meeral has already been abated. ADPP for the State is present. Mr. Syed Tarique Ahmed Shah advocate for accused Shafquat Umrani is present. Mr. Hashim Laghari advocate for accused Liaquat is absent, however his associate is present. Mr. Sahib Khan Panhwar advocate on behalf of P.W Nayab Umrani is present. For want of time case adjourned to 03.09.2026, for further proceedings/further comparison of the video of evidence with the written evidence of PW- Nayab Umrani. |
For Final Arguments |
0 |
0 |
ADJ I, Hyderabad
|
27-AUG-2026
|
Case called. Accused Shafquat Umrani is produced by jail authorities. Accused Liaquat Umrani is absent his counsel filed application for condonation a/w 540 Cr.PC. No objection given by advocate for accused Shafqat Umrani and counsel for PW- Nayab. Order passed on it. Condoned. The proceeding against accused Meeral has already been abated. ADPP for the State is present. Mr. Syed Tarique Ahmed Shah advocate for accused Shafquat Umrani is present. Mr. Hashim Laghari advocate for accused Liaquat is absent, however his associate is present. Mr. Sahib Khan Panhwar advocate on behalf of P.W Nayab Umrani is present. In compliance of order dated 23.06.2026 passed by Honorable Supreme Court of Pakistan in Cr.P..No.1033 and 1036 of 2024, Cr. Misc. Application No.1207/2024 in Crl. P.L.A.No.1033/2024 the process of comparing the video recording of the statement of P.W/petitioner Nayyab Umrani with her written statement was started in presence of learned counsel for the accused, learned counsel for P.W Nayyab and learned ADPP for the State. Order passed on separate sheet. Put off to 02.09.2026, for further proceedings/further comparison of the video of evidence with the written evidence of PW- Nayab Umrani. |
For Final Arguments |
0 |
0 |
ADJ I, Hyderabad
|