| Hearing Date | Diary | Status | Units / Application | Witness | Court |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03-JUN-2026 Restored (3) |
For Evidence | 0 | 0 | ADJ I, Kandhkot | |
| 13-MAY-2026 Restored (3) |
Case is called. Accused Dhani Bux @ Dhano Bahalkani is produced in custody by J/A District Prison Shikarpur, through online video link. Co-accused Fateh Muhammad @ Khalil has already been acquitted by this Court on merits u/s 265-H(i) Cr.P.C, vide judgment dated 27.03.2023 (at Ext.29). Co-accused Abdul Qadir has also been acquitted by this Court by way of compromise u/s 345(6) Cr.P.C, vide order dated 12.10.2023. While remaining accused are absconders and already declared as P.Os. Mr.Riaz Ahmed Channa, learned ADPP for the State is present. Mr.Ahmed Raza Sundrani, learned advocate for complainant is present. Complainant Abdul Razzaque Jageerani is present. Vakalatnama filed by Mr.Deedar Ali Bangwar advocate on behalf of present accused. Order on it. Filed. No.PW is present. A formal charge against the present accused framed at Ext.36, his plea also recorded at Ext.36/A, to which present accused, through online video link, pleaded not guilty and claimed for trial. Case put off to:03.06.2026, for evidence. Accused named above is remanded back to concerned J/A with directions to be produced him on the date of hearing, through online video link. Office is directed to send plea of accused to Superintendent District Prison Shikarpur with direction to obtain signature/LTI from the accused and sent back the same plea to this Court for office record. Issue summons against complainant and P.Ws; so also call for case property. | For Charge | 0 | 0 | ADJ I, Kandhkot |
| 04-MAY-2026 Restored (3) |
Case is called. Accused Dhani Bux @ Dhano Bahalkani is produced in custody by J/A District Prison Shikarpur, through online video link. Co-accused Fateh Muhammad @ Khalil has already been acquitted by this Court on merits u/s 265-H(i) Cr.P.C, vide judgment dated 27.03.2023 (at Ext.29). Co-accused Abdul Qadir has also been acquitted by this Court by way of compromise u/s 345(6) Cr.P.C, vide order dated 12.10.2023. While remaining accused are absconders and already declared as P.Os. Mr.Riaz Ahmed Channa, learned ADPP for the State is present. Mr.Ahmed Raza Sundrani, learned advocate for complainant is present. Complainant Abdul Razzaque Jageerani is present. Accused yet not engage his counsel and he has sent application through Superintendent concerned jail authority for time to engage his counsel. Order on it. Time granted, till next date of hearing. Statement filed by Mr.Jote Ali Bangwar, advocate on behalf of accused that he shall file his power on behalf of accused on the next date of hearing. Order on it. Filed. Case is adjourned to:13.05.2026, for framing of charge. Jail Authority concerned is directed to produce the custody of accused Dhani Bux @ Dhano on the next date of hearing, through online video link. Accused is directed to engage his counsel, till next date of hearing. | For Charge | 0 | 0 | ADJ I, Kandhkot |
| 23-APR-2026 Restored (3) |
Case is called. Accused Dhani Bux @ Dhano Bahalkani is produced in custody by J/A District Prison Shikarpur, through online video link. Co-accused Fateh Muhammad @ Khalil has already been acquitted by this Court on merits u/s 265-H(i) Cr.P.C, vide judgment dated 27.03.2023 (at Ext.29). Co-accused Abdul Qadir has also been acquitted by this Court by way of compromise u/s 345(6) Cr.P.C, vide order dated 12.10.2023. While remaining accused are absconders and already declared as P.Os. Mr.Gahi Khan Bangwar, learned ADPP for the State is present. Mr.Ahmed Raza Sundrani, learned advocate for complainant is present. No P.W is present. Accused yet not engage his counsel, therefore, instant case is adjourned to:04.05.2026, for framing of charge. Jail Authority concerned is directed to produce the custody of accused Dhani Bux @ Dhano on the next date of hearing, through online video link. Accused is directed to engage his counsel, till next date of hearing. | For Charge | 0 | 0 | ADJ I, Kandhkot |
| 16-APR-2026 Restored (3) |
Case is called. Accused Dhani Bux @ Dhano Bahalkani is produced in custody by J/A District Prison Shikarpur, through online video link. Co-accused Fateh Muhammad @ Khalil has already been acquitted by this Court on merits u/s 265-H(i) Cr.P.C, vide judgment dated 27.03.2023 (at Ext.29). Co-accused Abdul Qadir has also been acquitted by this Court by way of compromise u/s 345(6) Cr.P.C, vide order dated 12.10.2023. While remaining accused are absconders and already declared as P.Os. Mr.Gahi Khan Bangwar, learned ADPP for the State is present. Mr.Ahmed Raza Sundrani, learned advocate for complainant is present. No P.W is present. Accused yet not engage his counsel, therefore, as last chance Case in hand is adjourned to:23.04.2026, for framing of charge. Jail Authority concerned is directed to produce the custody of accused Dhani Bux @ Dhano on the next date of hearing, through online video link. Accused is directed to engage his counsel, till next date of hearing. | For Charge | 0 | 0 | ADJ I, Kandhkot |
| 01-APR-2026 Restored (3) |
Case is called. Accused Dhani Bux @ Dhano Bahalkani is produced in custody by J/A District Prison Shikarpur, through online video link. Co-accused Fateh Muhammad @ Khalil has already been acquitted by this Court on merits u/s 265-H(i) Cr.P.C, vide judgment dated 27.03.2023 (at Ext.29). Co-accused Abdul Qadir has also been acquitted by this Court by way of compromise u/s 345(6) Cr.P.C, vide order dated 12.10.2023. While remaining accused are absconders and already declared as P.Os. Mr.Gahi Khan Bangwar, learned ADPP for the State is present. Mr.Ahmed Raza Sundrani, learned advocate for complainant is present. No P.W is present. Accused yet not engage his counsel, therefore, as last chance Case in hand is adjourned to:16.04.2026, for framing of charge. Jail Authority concerned is directed to produce the custody of accused Dhani Bux @ Dhano on the next date of hearing, through online video link. Accused is directed to engage his counsel, till next date of hearing. | For Charge | 0 | 0 | ADJ I, Kandhkot |
| 18-MAR-2026 Restored (3) |
Case is called. Accused Dhani Bux @ Dhano Bahalkani is produced in custody by J/A District Prison Shikarpur, through online video link. Co-accused Fateh Muhammad @ Khalil has already been acquitted by this Court on merits u/s 265-H(i) Cr.P.C, vide judgment dated 27.03.2023 (at Ext.29). Co-accused Abdul Qadir has also been acquitted by this Court by way of compromise u/s 345(6) Cr.P.C, vide order dated 12.10.2023. While remaining accused are absconders and already declared as P.Os. Mr.Riaz Ahmed Channa, learned ADPP for the State is present. Mr.Ahmed Raza Sundrani, learned advocate for complainant is present. Complainant Abdul Razzaque Jageerani also present. Accused yet not engage his counsel, therefore, Case is adjourned to:01.04.2026, for framing of charge. Jail Authority concerned is directed to produce the custody of accused Dhani Bux @ Dhano on the next date of hearing, through online video link. Accused is directed to engage his counsel, till next date of hearing. | For Charge | 0 | 0 | ADJ I, Kandhkot |
| 03-MAR-2026 Restored (3) |
Case is called. Accused Dhani Bux @ Dhano Bahalkani is produced in custody by J/A District Prison Shikarpur, through online video link. Co-accused Fateh Muhammad @ Khalil has already been acquitted by this Court on merits u/s 265-H(i) Cr.P.C, vide judgment dated 27.03.2023 (at Ext.29). Co-accused Abdul Qadir has also been acquitted by this Court by way of compromise u/s 345(6) Cr.P.C, vide order dated 12.10.2023. While remaining accused are absconders and already declared as P.Os. Mr.Riaz Ahmed Channa, learned ADPP for the State is present. Mr.Ahmed Raza Sundrani, learned advocate for complainant is present. Complainant Abdul Razzaque Jageerani also present. Accused yet not engage his counsel, therefore, Case is adjourned to:18.03.2026, for framing of charge. Jail Authority concerned is directed to produce the custody of accused Dhani Bux @ Dhano on the next date of hearing, through online video link. Accused is directed to engage his counsel, till next date of hearing. | For Charge | 0 | 0 | ADJ I, Kandhkot |
| 20-FEB-2026 Restored (3) |
Case is called. Accused Dhani Bux @ Dhano Bahalkani is produced in custody by J/A District Prison Shikarpur, through online video link. Co-accused Fateh Muhammad @ Khalil has already been acquitted by this Court on merits u/s 265-H(i) Cr.P.C, vide judgment dated 27.03.2023 (at Ext.29). Co-accused Abdul Qadir has already been acquitted by this Court u/s 345(6) Cr.P.C, vide order dated 12.10.2023.While remaining accused are absconders and already declared as P.Os. Mr.Gahi Khan Bangwar, learned ADPP for the State is present. Mr.Ahmed Raza Sundrani, learned advocate for complainant is called absent. Complainant Abdul Razzaque Jageerani also called absent. Suplementary challan against the accused Dhani Bux @ Dhano already received by this Court. Copies of necessary case papers supplied to the above accused, free of costs under proper receipt at Ext.35. Case is adjourned to:03.03.2026, for framing of charge. Jail Authority concerned is directed to produce the custody of accused on the next date of hearing, through online video link. Let necessary documents of case papers/police and receipt be send to Superintendent District Prison Shikarpur with direction to hand over such documents to the accused and obtained signature/LTI of accused on the receipt and sent back the same receipt to this court for office record. | For Supply of Copies | 0 | 0 | ADJ I, Kandhkot |
| 12-OCT-2023 Restored (2) |
Case a/with compromise application u/s 345-2 & 345-6 Cr.P.C called. Accused Abdul Qadir Bahalkani is present on bail. Co-accused Fateh Muhammad was already been acquitted by this court on merits u/s 265-H(i) Cr.P.C, vide judgment dated: 27.3.2023. While remaining accused are absconders and already declared s P.Os. Learned DDPP for the State is present. Mr.Saeed Ahmed B.Bijarani, learned advocate of accused is present. Mr.Ahmed Raza Sundrani, learned advocate of complainant is present. No P.W is present. Statement submitted by learned advocate of applicant/accused and produced copy of newspaper daily 'KAWISH' Hyderabad in which publication was published for the general public. Order passed on it. File. Arguments heard on compromise applications u/s 345-2 345-6 Cr.P.C from both the sides. Common order also passed thereon, signed and announced in open court. For the reasons to be recorded. Since the offence under section??302 PPC is compoundable as per schedule and in this case the complainant Abdul Razzaque who is son of the deceased, has submitted compromise application stating therein that they have voluntarily made compromise with the present accused and has no objection, if the present is acquitted from the charge, however, he does not waive the right of compensation against the present accused. In these circumstances when the compromise arrived at by the parties appears to be voluntarily in nature, I am of the view that the application under section 345-2 Cr.P.C seeking permission to compound the offence, merits consideration, therefore, the same is hereby allowed and in consequence thereof, the application U/S 345-6 Cr.P.C also stands allowed. Resultantly the accused namely Abdul Qadir son of Jan Muhammad by caste Bahalkani, is hereby acquitted under section 345-6 Cr.P.C. It is admitted fact that the complainant Abdul Razzaque being son of the deceased Abdul Malik alias Fata, has only extended his no object for acquittal of the present accused Abdul Qadir and he has not waived the right of Qisas, diyat, Arsh etc. Apart from this there are 13 other legal heirs of the deceased including minors and 03 widows but complainant has failed to produce them before this court in order to extend their no objection for acquittal of accused or to waive their right of compensation due against the present accused. Therefore, although ??the accused is acquitted under section 345-(6) Cr.P.C in consequence of compounding the offence by the complainant/son of the deceased but the remaining legal heirs have not appeared before this court to waive their right of compensation, therefore, I am of the view that in spite of acquittal under section 345-(6) Cr.P.C the accused namely Abdul Qadir Bahalkani, is required to pay Diyat amount to all the above named legal heirs of the deceased Abdul Malik alias Fanta Jageerani. The Diyat amount shall be paid by the accused with reference to current financial year. In order to execute instant order accused Abdul Qadir, by caste Bahalkani, who is present before court on bail, is taken into custody, and remanded to Central Prison and Correctional Facility Sukkur for want of payment of Diyat amount to the above mentioned legal heirs of the deceased named above, however, he shall be released on bail subject to furnishing solvent surety equal to Diyat amount imposed on him by this court. In case of non payment of above mentioned Diyat amount by the above named accused, to the legal heirs of the deceased named above, the accused shall remained behind the bars until he makes the payment of above mentioned Diyat amount good to the above mentioned legal heirs of the deceased and the same amount shall be recovered from the accused, as arrears of land revenue. However, the bail bonds of accused is hereby cancelled and surety is discharged. | For Hearing of Compromise Appl: | 0 | 0 | ADJ I, Kandhkot |