03-APR-2026
|
|
For W/S/Objections/C.A. |
0 |
0 |
SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Shahdadkot
|
24-MAR-2026
|
Suit NO" 61/2025 called. Plaintiff is called absent, however, his learned counsel is also called absent. Defendant No.1 Mst. Naheed is called absent, however, her learned counsel is present. Defendants NO. 2 and 3 are called absent. Defendants No.4 to 12 are called absent. DDA is present on behalf of official defendants and did not file objections and written statement. Advocate for plaintiff sent adjournment application through his assistant/associate order on it, allowed. Put off to 03-04-2026, for WS/Objections of defendants No. 4, 6, 8 to 10 and 12 and objections on application u/o 7 rule 11 CPC filed by the advocate for defendant NO.01. |
For W/S/Objections/C.A. |
0 |
0 |
SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Shahdadkot
|
03-MAR-2026
|
Suit called. Plaintiff is called absent, however, his learned counsel is present. Defendant No.1 Mst. Naheed is present, her advocate is also present. Defendant NO. 1 filed w/stt and objection on application u/o 39 rule 1 and 2 CPC Order on it, copy to other side the copy of other side supplied to other side. Advocate for defendant NO.1 filed application u/o 7 rule 11 CPC along with affidavit of Mst. Naheed order on it, copy to other side. The copy of other side supplied to other side. Defendant NO. 2 and 3 are called absent. Defendants No.4 to 12 are called absent. DDA is present on behalf of official defendants and did not file objections and written statement. Put off to 24-03-2026, for WS/Objections of defendants No. 4, 6, 8 to 10 and 12 and objections on application u/o 7 rule 11 CPC filed by the advocate for defendant NO.01. |
For W/S/Objections/C.A. |
0 |
0 |
SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Shahdadkot
|
20-FEB-2026
|
Matter called. Plaintiff called absent, his learned counsel is present. Defendant No.1 Mst. Naheed called absent, however, her learned counsel is present and submitted adjournment application which is granted. Defendant NO. 2 and 3 filed objections and w/stt which are kept on record copy of such objections and w/stt supplied to other side. Defendants No.4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 called absent and not yet filed WS/Objections though already served on 14.01.2026. Defendants No.5, 7 and 11 are absent but already filed their WS. DDA is present on behalf of official defendants No.4 to 12. Put off to 03-03-2026, for WS/Objections of defendants No.1, 4, 6, 8 to 10 and 12. |
For W/S/Objections/C.A. |
0 |
0 |
SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Shahdadkot
|
09-FEB-2026
|
Matter called. Plaintiff called absent, his learned counsel is also not present. Defendant No.1 Mst. Naheed called absent but her counsel is present. Advocate for defendant NO.1 submitted adjournment application which is granted. Defendant No.3 Muhammad Rafique, who is also attorney to defendant No.2 called absent. Defendants No.4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 called absent and not yet filed WS/Objections though already served on 14.01.2026. Defendants No.5, 7 and 11 are absent but already filed their WS. DDA is present on behalf of official defendants No.4 to 12. Put off to 20.02.2026, for WS/Objections of defendants No.1 to 4, 6, 8 to 10 and 12. |
For W/S/Objections/C.A. |
0 |
0 |
SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Shahdadkot
|
29-JAN-2026
|
Matter called. Plaintiff called absent but his counsel is present. Defendant No.1 Mst. Naheed called absent but her counsel is present. Defendant No.3 Muhammad Rafique, who is also attorney to defendant No.2 called absent. Defendants No.4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 called absent and not yet filed WS/Objections though already served on 14.01.2026. Defendants No.5, 7 and 11 are absent but already filed their WS. Process upon defendant No.9 not yet returned. Learned DDA is appeared and filed Memo of Appearance on behalf of official defendants No.4 to 12. Order on it. File. The Service held good against defendant No.9 through DDA. Further matter is adjourned. Put off to 09.02.2026, for WS/Objections of defendants No.1 to 4, 6, 8 to 10 and 12. |
For Service |
0 |
0 |
SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Shahdadkot
|
14-JAN-2026
|
Matter called. Plaintiff is absent but his counsel is present. Process upon defendants No.3, 5, 6 & 7 already returned by bailiff as served. Process issued upon defendant No.1, 3 to 7 and same is returned served upon defendants No.3 to 7, while service upon defendant No.1 returned unserved, as per endorsement of bailiff. Process also issued upon defendants No.8, 10 to 12 through TCS and such receipts a/w delivery reports presented by learned counsel for plaintiff through Statement. Order on it. File. Process issued upon defendant No.9 but reply of same not yet returned. Learned counsel Mr. Muhammad Sadique Seelro appeared and filed Vakalatnama on behalf of defendant No.1 Mst. Naheed. Order on it. File. Defendant No.3 Muhammad Rafique Khoso is present in person and filed adjournment application a/w PS copy of Special Power of Attorney duly executant by defendant No.2 Mst. Waziran in favor of defendant No.3. Order on it. Allowed. The Service held good against defendants No.1 to 8 and 10 to 12. Defendant No.5 (Mukhtiarkar Shahdadkot) is present and filed Written Statement as well as on behalf of defendant No.11 along with attested PS copies of relevant record. Order on it. Copy to other side. Copy delivered. Defendant No.7 (SHO P.S I.B.Jamali) filed written reply/report. Order on it. File. Letter No.40 dated 08/01/2026 is received from defendant No.10 (I.G.R Sindh Hyderabad) in which directions have been made to Sub-Registrar Shahdadkot to attend the Court. Order on it. File. Put off to 29.01.2026, for Service and WS/Objections of defendants No.1 to 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12. Repeat process upon defendant No.9 through concerned court, A.D & TCS, as already ordered. |
For Service |
0 |
0 |
SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Shahdadkot
|
16-DEC-2025
|
Matter called. Plaintiff called absent but his counsel is present. Process upon defendants No.3, 5, 6 & 7 already returned by bailiff with endorsement as served but defendants could not be served through A.D & TCS. Process issued upon defendants No.1 and 3 to 9 but reply of same not yet returned duly served or unserved and even no receipt of A.D and TCS presented by plaintiff. Learned counsel for plaintiff filed Statement along with three receipts of A.Ds only against defendants No.10 to 12. Order on it. File. Fresh address of defendant No.2 not yet provided by learned counsel for plaintiff, upon which He filed an Application U/S.148 CPC for extension of time. Order on it. Condoned. Matter is adjourned. Put off to 14.01.2026, for service and filing of fresh address of defendant No.2. Repeat process upon defendants No.3, 5, 6 & 7 through A.D & TCS, defendants No.1, 4, 8 & 9 through court bailiff, A.D & TCS, and defendants No.10 to 12 through TCS, as already ordered. |
For Service |
0 |
0 |
SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Shahdadkot
|
06-DEC-2025
|
Matter called. Plaintiff called absent but his counsel is present and presented requisite COURT FEE STAMP of Rs.15,000/- in favor of plaintiff through Statement. Order on it. File. Process already returned served upon defendants No.3, 5, 6 & 7, while defendant No.2 has been shifted away from his given address to Karachi as per endorsement of bailiff but the said defendants could not be served through A.D & TCS. Process issued upon defendants No.8 to 12 but reply of same not yet returned and even no receipt of A.D and TCS presented by counsel for plaintiff. Matter is adjourned. Put off to 16.12.2025, for service and filing of fresh address of defendant No.2. Repeat process upon defendants No.3, 5, 6 & 7 through A.D & TCS, as already ordered and Issue process upon defendants No.1, 4, 8 to 12 through court bailiff, A.D & TCS. |
For Service |
0 |
0 |
SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Shahdadkot
|
24-NOV-2025
|
The P.O has gone to attend training program at Sindh Judicial Academy Karachi. Plaintiff called absent but his counsel is present. Process already returned upon defendants with endorsement of bailiff that one Zahid Hussain received copy of summons/notice on behalf of defendant No.1, defendant No.2 has been shifted away from given address to Karachi, however, defendants No.3, 5, 6 & 7 themselves received the copies of summons/notices. Process issued upon defendants No.8 to 12 but not yet returned and even no receipt of A.D and TCS presented by the plaintiff. The requisite Court Fee Stamps not yet provided by the plaintiff or his counsel. Matter is adjourned to same stage. Put off to 06.12.2025, for Service of defendants No.8 to 12 and appearance of defendants No.1 to 7 or otherwise. Repeat process upon defendants No.8 to 12 through TCS and A.D, as already ordered. |
For Service |
0 |
0 |
SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Shahdadkot
|