16-JUL-2026
|
Matter called. Plaintiff is called absent. counsel for plaintiff is present. Defendants No 1 present . today defendants no 1 has submitted application for adjournment at ex . 05.order passed thereon .today arguments heard by the advocate for plaintiff on the application u/o 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC that instant suit and has apprehension that defendant no; 1 in connivance with Revenue Officials will get change the revenue rord in his fvcour plaintiffss, while he is the owner conyrayry record reflects hat servie was effected upoj proivate defedant no; on 12.5.2026 but he could not made his appearance but he appeared today and filed application which is on record at ex. 05 since proper objection to the application u/o XXXXIX Rule 1 and 2 cpc and written statement has no come on record, thus application u/o 39 rule 1 nd 2 cpc is not decided, however status quo order is granted till next date of hearing. such order passed on order sheet. both the parties are directed to maintain status quo order . put off 30.07.2026 for objection on the application u/o XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 cpc for w/s of defendants no 1 to 07. |
For Service |
0 |
0 |
SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge II, Sanghar
|