16-DEC-2025
|
|
For W/S/Objections/C.A. |
0 |
0 |
SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Shahdadkot
|
28-NOV-2025
|
|
For Service |
0 |
0 |
SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Shahdadkot
|
04-NOV-2025
|
Matter called. Plaintiff No.1 Mehrwan Nagdev, who is also attorney to plaintiffs No.2 to 6 called absent, their counsel is present and produced Court Fee Stamps of Rs.15000/- in favor of plaintiff No.1 Mehrwan through Statement at Exh.30. Order on it. Filed. Defendant No.1 called absent but his counsel is present and not yet filed WS/Objections. He filed adjournment application at Exh.31. Order on it. Allowed. Process upon defendants No.2 & 3 issued through court as the said defendants are plaintiffs in F.C.Suit No.36/2025. Order thereon. As per report of Reader, the matter i.e.36/2025 was called but the plaintiffs (i.e. defendants No.2 and 3) were called absent; however, the counsel representing the plaintiffs marked his appearance but he refused to receive the summons; hence, the summons could not be served and the same are returned unserved. Order passed thereon. Service through bailiff & Courier on defendant No.2, plaintiff is directed to submit complete address of defendant No.3. Defendants No.4, 6, 8, 9. 10, 12 & 13 called absent but already filed WS. Defendants No.5, 7 & 11 are already served 22.09.2025 but called absent and not yet filed WS/ objections. DDA is absent. Put off to 28.11.2025, for service of defendant No.2, compliance/submission of complete address of defendant No.3 and WS/Objections of defendants No.1, 5, 7 and 11. |
For Service |
0 |
0 |
SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Shahdadkot
|
22-OCT-2025
|
The P.O has gone to attend training program at Sindh Judicial Academy Karachi. Matter called. Plaintiff No.1 Mehrwan Nagdev, who is also attorney to plaintiffs No.2 to 6 called present with counsel. Defendant No.1 is already served but called absent with counsel and not yet filed WS/Objections. Defendants No.2 and 3 not yet served; however, learned counsel for plaintiffs already filed statement that defendants No.2 and 3 are plaintiffs in F.C Suit No.36/2025 and such suit filed by the defendant No.3 through defendant No.2; hence he prayed that service upon defendants be held good through F.C.Suit No.36/2025 re- Prem Chand and others Vs. Mehrwan Negdev and others. Defendants No.4, 6, 8, 9. 10, 12 and 13 called absent but already filed WS. Defendants No.5, 7 and 11 are already served but called absent and not yet filed WS/objections. DDA is absent. Plaintiffs and their counsel failed to produce requisite Court Fee Stamps. Matter is adjourned to same stage with same directions. Put off to 04.11.2025, for Service upon defendants No.2 and 3, WS/objections of defendants No.1, 5, 7 and 11, Objections on Application U/O.39 Rule 1, 2 & 3 CPC R/W S.151 CPC. |
For Service |
0 |
0 |
SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Shahdadkot
|
09-OCT-2025
|
Matter called. Plaintiff No.1 Mehrwan Nagdev, who is also attorney to plaintiffs No.2 to 6 called present with counsel. Defendant No.1 is already served but called absent, his counsel is present and not yet filed WS/Objections. Defendants No.2 and 3 not yet served. Defendants No.4, 6, 8, 9. 10, 12 and 13 called absent but already filed their respective WS. Defendants No.5, 7 and 11 are already served but called absent and not yet filed WS/objections. DDA is present for official defendants No.4 to 13. Learned counsel for defendant No.1 filed application U/S.148 CPC at Exh.25 for extension of time to file WS/Objections. Order on it. Allowed. Learned counsel for plaintiffs filed Statement at Exh.26 that defendants No.2 and 3 are plaintiffs in F.C Suit No.36/2025 and such suit filed by the defendant No.3 through defendant No.2; hence he prayed that service upon defendants be held good through F.C.Suit No.36/2025 re- Prem Chand and others Vs. Mehrwan Negdev and others. Order on it. Service through Court. Plaintiffs and their counsel failed to produce requisite Court Fee Stamps. Today he filed Application U/S.148 CPC at Exh.27 for extension of time. Order on it. Allowed. Put off to 22.10.2025, for service upon defendants No.2 and 3, WS/objections of defendants No.5, 7 and 11, filing C/A on Application U/O.39 Rule 1, 2 & 3 CPC R/W S.151 CPC. |
For Service |
0 |
0 |
SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Shahdadkot
|
22-SEP-2025
|
Matter called. Plaintiff No.1 Mehrwan Nagdev, who is also attorney to plaintiffs No.2 to 6 called present with counsel. Process issued upon all the defendants, returned served upon defendants No.1, 4 to 7, 9 and 10 as per endorsement of Court bailiff, he also stated that he delivered copy of summons to the concerned defendants along with PS copies of memo and relevant documents; however, defendant No.2 Prem Chand used to reside at Karachi. Order on it. Filed, Repeat for def.No.2, submit complete address of def.No.3. Let Service upon defendants No.1, 4 to 7, 9 and 10 is ordered to be held good. Defendant No.1 (Parkash Lal) is present in person. Learned counsel Mr. Altaf Qadir Awan appeared and filed Vakalatnama at Exh.14 on behalf of defendant No.1 a/w PS copy of his CNIC. Order on it. Filed. Process also issued upon defendants No.8, 11 through registered A.D, defendants No.12, 13 through TCS and such receipts presented by learned counsel for plaintiffs at Exh.15 along with postal A.Ds upon defendants No.1 to 7, 9 and 10 duly signed as well as shipment tracking summary of TCS. Order on it. Filed. The rest of defendants are absent. DDA is present and filed Memo of Appearance on behalf of official defendants No.4 to 13 at Exh.16. Order on it. Filed. The Service upon defendants No.8, 11 to 13 also ordered to be held good. PS copies of memo of plaint along with annexure delivered to the learned DDA. Defendant No.9 (SHO PS A-Sec. Shahdadkot) sent WS/Reply through a constable which is placed on record at Exh.17. Defendant No.4 (Mukhtiarkar/City Survey Officer Shahdadkot) sent Written Statement at Exh.18 through authorized person Munshi Abdul Ghafoor Supervising Tapedar with authority letter at Exh.19 and PS copies of relevant documents. Order on it. Filed. Copy delivered. DDA also filed Statement at Exh.20 that defendants No.6 to 8 adopt the same contents of written statement as filed by defendant No.4, whereas defendants No.12 and 13 are proforma defendants and no relief has been claimed against the defendants No.12 and 13; hence they also adopt the same contents of written statement as filed by defendant No.4. Order on it. Filed. Defendant No.10 (SDPO Shahdadkot) sent Written Objection at Exh.21 through authorized person LNC Asad Ali with authority letter at Exh.22. Order on it. Filed. Copy delivered. Plaintiffs and their counsel failed to deposit requisite Court Fee. Learned counsel for plaintiffs filed Application U/S.148 CPC at Exh.23 for extension of time supported by affidavit at Exh.24. Order on it. Extended till next date of hearing. Put off to 09.10.2025, for Service, WS/Objections on Application U/O.39 Rule 1, 2 & 3 CPC R/W S.151 CPC. |
For Service |
0 |
0 |
SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Shahdadkot
|