| Hearing Date | Diary | Status | Units / Application | Witness | Court |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26-FEB-2026 |
For Service | 0 | 0 | SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Shahdadkot | |
| 02-FEB-2026 |
Matter called. Plaintiff No.1 Fida Hussain, who is also attorney to plaintiffs No.2 to 4 called present without counsel. Defendants No.5, 10, 11, 24 to 29, 47, 54, 55, 57 to 59, 61, 63, 65, 75, 92 to 100 are already made ex-parte. Naeem Ahmed, attorney to defendants No.35, 48 & 49 is present with counsel and already filed WS/Objections. Process upon rest of defendants not issued. Defendant No.70 is said to be expired and counsel for plaintiffs not yet filed such proper application. The publication notice issued upon defendants. Plaintiff No.1 filed Statement along with copy of Sindhi Newspaper Phanji Akhbar vide dated 05.01.2026 in respect of publication upon defendants. No rest of defendant is in attendance. Defendants No.1 to 4, 6 to 9, 12 to 23, 30 to 34, 36 to 46, 50 to 53, 56, 60, 62, 64, 66 to 69, 71 to 74, 76 to 91 could not be served by way pasting as well as TCS; hence process be repeated upon them except publication. Put off to 26.02.2026, for service and compliance/filing proper application for defendant No.70 (said to be expired). | For Service | 0 | 0 | SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Shahdadkot |
| 16-JAN-2026 |
Matter called. Plaintiff No.1 Fida Hussain, who is also attorney to plaintiffs No.2 to 4 called present without counsel. Defendants No.5, 10, 11, 24 to 29, 47, 54, 55, 57 to 59, 61, 63, 65, 75, 92 to 100 are already made ex-parte. Naeem Ahmed, attorney to defendants No.35, 48 & 49 is present with counsel and already filed WS/Objections. Process upon rest of defendants not issued. Defendant No.70 is said to be expired and counsel for plaintiffs not yet filed such proper application. The publication notice issued upon defendants. Plaintiff No.1 filed Statement along with copy of Sindhi Newspaper Phanji Akhbar vide dated 05.01.2026 in respect of publication upon defendants. No rest of defendant is in attendance. Defendants No.1 to 4, 6 to 9, 12 to 23, 30 to 34, 36 to 46, 50 to 53, 56, 60, 62, 64, 66 to 69, 71 to 74, 76 to 91 could not be served by way pasting as well as TCS; hence process be repeated upon them except publication. Put off to 02.02.2026, for service and compliance/filing proper application for defendant No.70 (said to be expired). | For Service | 0 | 0 | SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Shahdadkot |
| 16-DEC-2025 |
Matter called. Plaintiff No.1 Fida Hussain, who is also attorney to plaintiffs No.2 to 4 called present without counsel. Defendants No.5, 10, 11, 24 to 26, 47, 61, 63, 65, 92 to 100 are already made ex-parte. Naeem Ahmed, attorney to defendants No.35, 48 & 49 is present with counsel and already filed WS/Objections. Defendants No.57, 58, 59 & 75 are already served on 30.09.2025 while defendants No.27 to 29, 54 & 55 also served on 14.10.2025 (through publication) but called absent. Since mandatory provision has been passed but defendants No.27 to 29, 54, 55, 57, 58, 59 & 75 failed to file WS/Objections; therefore, they are ordered to be debarred from filing WS/Objections and proceeded as ex-parte. Process upon rest of defendants not issued. Defendant No.70 is said to be expired and counsel for plaintiffs not yet filed such proper application. Plaintiff No.1 filed an Application U/O.V Rule 20 CPC containing affidavit in respect of service upon remaining defendants through substitute service. Order passed on separate sheet. This application is allowed with direction to plaintiff to get publication summons/notices in Daily Newspaper "PHANJI AKHBAR" as well as through pasting and TCS for service of defendants No.1 to 4, 6 to 9, 12 to 23, 30 to 34, 36 to 46, 50 to 53, 56, 60, 62, 64, 66 to 69, 71 to 74, 76 to 91 on costs. Put off to 16.01.2026, for Service/Publication and compliance/filing proper application for defendant No.70 (said to be expired). | For Service | 0 | 0 | SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Shahdadkot |
| 04-DEC-2025 |
Matter called. Plaintiff No.1 Fida Hussain, who is also attorney to plaintiffs No.2 to 4 called present but their counsel is absent. Defendants No.5, 10, 11, 24 to 26, 47, 61, 63, 65, 92 to 100 are already made ex-parte. Naeem Ahmed, attorney to defendants No.35, 48 & 49 called present with counsel and already filed WS/Objections. Defendants No.57, 58, 59 & 75 are already served on 30.09.2025, defendants No.27 to 29, 54 & 55 also served on 14.10.2025 (through publication) but called absent and not yet filed WS/Objections. Process issued upon rest of defendants No.1 to 4, 6 to 9, 12 to 23, 30 to 34, 36 to 46, 53, 62, 64, 66, 71, 72, 73, 74, 76, 78, 86 to 91 through court of Honourable District Judge, Larkana but reply of same not yet returned. Process also issued upon defendants No.50 to 52, 67 to 69, 77 and 79 to 84 through registered A/D and envelops along with ADs returned unserved upon defendants No.50 to 52, 67 to 69 and 77, while remaining ADs not yet returned duly served or unserved. No receipt of A.D and TCS presented by the plaintiffs. Defendant No.70 is said to be expired and counsel for plaintiffs not yet filed such proper application. Matter is adjourned. Put off to 16.12.2025, for service, compliance/filing proper application for defendant No.70 (said to be expired), WS/ Objections of defendants No.27 to 29, 54, 55, 57, 58, 59 & 75. Repeat process upon defendants No.2 to 4, 6 to 9, 12 to 23 (by way of pasting) AND defendants No.1, 30 to 34, 36 to 46, 53, 62, 64, 66, 71, 72, 74, 76, 78, 86 to 91 through Honourable District Judge KSK and A.D. Repeat process upon defendants No.56, 60 & 85 by way of pasting through bailiff, as already ordered. Repeat process upon defendants No.50 to 52, 67 to 69, 77 and 79 to 84 through bailiff. Repeat process upon defendant No.73 through concerned court, A.D and TCS, as already ordered. | For Service | 0 | 0 | SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Shahdadkot |
| 19-NOV-2025 |
The P.O is on casual leave. Matter called. Plaintiff No.1 Fida Hussain, who is also attorney to plaintiffs No.2 to 4 called present with counsel. Defendants No.5, 10, 11, 24 to 26, 47, 61, 63, 65, 92 to 100 are already made ex-parte. Naeem Ahmed, attorney to defendants No.35, 48 & 49 called absent but their counsel is present and already filed WS/Objections. Defendants No.57, 58, 59 & 75 are already served on 30.09.2025, defendants No.27 to 29, 54 & 55 also served on 14.10.2025 (through publication) but called absent and not yet filed WS/Objections. Process issued upon rest of defendants but reply of same not yet returned and even no receipt of A.D as well as TCS produced by the plaintiffs or their counsel. Defendant No.70 is said to be expired and counsel for plaintiffs not yet filed proper application. Matter is adjourned due to strike announced by SBC, Karachi. Put off to 04.12.2025, for Service, Compliance, WS/Objections of defendants No.27 to 29, 54, 55, 57, 58, 59 & 75. Plaintiffs are directed to file proper application in respect to defendant No.70 (said to be expired) till next adjourned date. Repeat process upon defendants No.2 to 4, 6 to 9, 12 to 23 (by way of pasting) AND defendants No.1, 30 to 34, 36 to 46, 53, 62, 64, 66, 71, 72, 74, 76, 78, 86 to 91 through Honourable District Judge KSK and A.D. Repeat process upon defendants No.56, 60 & 85 by way of pasting through bailiff, as already ordered. Issue process upon defendants No.50 to 52, 67 to 69, 77 and 79 to 84 through bailiff, A.D and TCS. Issue process upon defendant No.73 through concerned court, A.D and TCS, as already ordered. |
For Service | 0 | 0 | SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Shahdadkot |
| 03-NOV-2025 |
Matter called. Plaintiff No.1 Fida Hussain, who is also attorney to plaintiffs No.2 to 4 called present with counsel. Defendants No.5, 10, 11, 24 to 26, 47, 61, 63, 65, 92 to 100 are already made ex-parte. Naeem Ahmed, attorney to defendants No.35, 48 & 49 called present with counsel and already filed WS/Objections. Defendants No.57, 58, 59 & 75 are already served on 30.09.2025, defendants No.27 to 29, 54 & 55 also served on 14.10.2025 (through publication) but called absent and not yet filed WS/Objections. Process issued upon defendants No.2 to 4, 6 to 9, 12 to 23 (by way of pasting) and defendants No.1, 30 to 34, 36 to 44, 46, 53, 62, 64, 66, 71, 72, 74, 76, 78, 86 to 91 but reply of same not yet returned from concerned court. Process also issued upon defendants No.56, 60 and 85 returned unserved as per endorsement of bailiff. Order on it. Repeat. Counsel for plaintiffs filed Statement at Exh.48 that defendant No.45 Mst. Zaib-ul-Nisa is alive. Order on it. Filed. He also filed Statement at Exh.49 to submit fresh address of defendants No.45, 50, 51, 52, 67, 68, 69, 73, 77, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83 and 84. Order on it. Service through all ordinary modes. Defendant No.70 is said to be expired and counsel for plaintiffs not yet filed proper application in respect of defendant No.70. Matter is adjourned on verbal request of counsel for plaintiffs. Put off to 19.11.2025, for Service, compliance, WS/Objections of defendants No.27 to 29, 54, 55, 57, 58, 59 & 75. Plaintiffs party are directed to file proper application in respect to defendant No.70 (said to be expired) till next adjourned date. Repeat process upon defendants No.2 to 4, 6 to 9, 12 to 23 (by way of pasting) AND defendants No.1, 30 to 34, 36 to 46, 53, 62, 64, 66, 71, 72, 74, 76, 78, 86 to 91 through Honourable District Judge KSK and A.D. Repeat process upon defendants No.56, 60 & 85 by way of pasting through bailiff, as already ordered. Issue process upon defendants No.50 to 52, 67 to 69, 77 and 79 to 84 through bailiff, A.D and TCS. Issue process upon defendant No.73 through concerned court, A.D and TCS. |
For Service | 0 | 0 | SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Shahdadkot |
| 14-OCT-2025 |
Matter called. Plaintiff No.1 Fida Hussain, who is also attorney to plaintiffs No.2 to 4 called present with counsel. Defendants No.5, 10, 11, 24 to 26, 47, 61, 63, 65, 92 to 100 are already made ex-parte. Naeem Ahmed, attorney to defendants No.35, 48 & 49 called present with counsel and already filed WS/Objections. Defendants No.57, 58, 59 & 75 are already served on 30.09.2025 but called absent and not yet filed WS/Objections. Process issued upon defendants No.27 to 29, 54 & 55 through publication and such copy of Newspaper daily Kawish dated 10.10,2025 presented by plaintiff, which is placed at Exh.44. Order on it. Filed. The Service held good against defendants No.27 to 29, 54 & 55 through publication. Process also issued upon defendants No.56, 60, 68, 69, 77 & 85, returned by bailiff with endorsement. Order on it. Submit fresh address for the def.No.68, 69 & 77, Service through pasting in presence of two witnesses on def.No.56, 60 & 85. Process also issued upon defendants No.2 to 4, 6 to 9, 12 to 23 (by way of pasting) and defendants No.1, 30 to 34, 36 to 44, 46, 53, 62, 64, 66, 71, 72, 74, 76, 78, 86 to 91 through the concerned Court but reply of same not yet returned duly served or unserved. Fresh address of defendants No.50 to 52, 67, 73, 79 to 84 as well as proper application in respect to defendants No.45 & 70 (said to be expired) not yet filed by plaintiffs party. Counsel for plaintiffs filed adjournment application at Exh.45 for grant of time. Allowed. Put off to 03.11.2025, for Service, compliance, WS/Objections of defendants No.27 to 29, 54, 55, 57, 58, 59 & 75. Plaintiffs party are directed to file proper application in respect to defendants No.45 & 70 (said to be expired) and fresh address of defendants No.50 to 52, 67, 68, 69, 73, 77, 79 to 84 till next adjourned date. Repeat process upon defendants No.2 to 4, 6 to 9, 12 to 23 (by way of pasting) AND defendants No.1, 30 to 34, 36 to 44, 46, 53, 62, 64, 66, 71, 72, 74, 76, 78, 86 to 91 through Honourable District Judge KSK and A.D. Issue process upon defendants No.56, 60 & 85 through bailiff by way of pasting. |
For Service | 0 | 0 | SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Shahdadkot |
| 30-SEP-2025 |
MATTER CALLED. Plaintiff No.1, who is also attorney to plaintiffs No.2 to 4 is present with counsel. Defendants No.5, 10, 11, 24 to 26, 47, 61, 63, 65, 92 to 100 are already made ex-parte. Naeem Ahmed, attorney to defendants No.35, 48 & 49 is absent but counsel present and already filed WS/Obj. Process issued upon defendants No.57 to 60, 68, 69, 75, 77 & 85, returned served upon defendants No.57, 58, 59 & 75, while process upon rest of defendants returned unserved as per endorsement of court bailiff. Order on it. Service held good upon defendants No.57, 58, 59 & 75. Rest of defendants not yet served and process upon them through concerned Court, publication and courier/registered A.D not issued. Fresh address of defendants No.50 to 52, 67, 73, 79 to 84 as well as proper application in respect to defendants No.45 & 70 (who said to be expired) not yet filed by plaintiffs. Put off to 14.10.2025, for Service/Compliance, WS/ Objections. Plaintiffs party are directed to file proper application in respect to defendants No.45 & 70 (who said to be expired) and fresh address of defendants No.50 to 52, 67, 73, 79 to 84 till next date. Issue process to defendants No.2 to 4, 6 to 9, 12 to 23 (by way of pasting) AND Defendants No.1, 30 to 34, 36 to 44, 46, 53, 62, 64, 66, 71, 72, 74, 76, 78, 86 to 91 through Honourable District Judge KSK and registered A.D. Issue process to defendants No.56, 60, 68, 69, 77 & 85 through Court bailiff and registered A.D. Issue publication notice upon defendants No.27 to 29, 54 & 55, as already ordered. |
For Service | 0 | 0 | SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Shahdadkot |
| 16-SEP-2025 |
Matter called. Plaintiff Fida Hussain, who is also attorney of plaintiffs No.2 to 4 called present with counsel. Defendants No.5, 10, 11, 24 to 26, 47, 61, 63, 65, 92 to 100 are already proceeded ex-parte. Naeem Ahmed, attorney to defendants No.35, 48 & 49 is present with counsel and already filed WS/Objections. Rest of defendants not yet served and process upon them not issued. Process viz. publication upon defendants No.27 to 29, 54, 55 & 70 also not issued. Counsel for plaintiffs filed fresh addresses of defendants No.1, 62, 64, 65, 68, 69 & 85 through his Statement. Order on it. Filed, let the service be made through all modes, except def.65. Learned counsel for plaintiffs also filed Statement that defendant No.70 has been died during pendency of suit. Order on it. Filed, to adopt the legal proceedings. Plaintiffs or their counsel not yet filed fresh address of defendants No.50 to 52, 67, 73, 79 to 84. Process viz. publication upon defendants No.27 to 29, 54, 55 & 70 not issued. Plaintiffs are directed to provide proper application in respect to defendant No.45 (who said to be expired) as well as fresh address of defendants No.50 to 52, 67, 73, 79 to 84 till next adjourned date. Put off to 30.09.2025, for Service, WS/Objections. Repeat process upon defendants No.2 to 4, 6 to 9, 12 to 23 (by way of pasting) through concerned court, defendants No.30 to 34, 36 to 44, 46, 53, 66, 71, 72, 74, 76, 78, 86 to 91 through Honourable District Judge, KSK and defendants No.56 to 60, 75 and 77 through court bailiff, process viz. publication be issued upon defendants No.27 to 29, 54 and 55, as already ordered. | For Service | 0 | 0 | SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Shahdadkot |