16-SEP-2025
|
|
For Evidence |
0 |
0 |
SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge I, Mirpurkhas
|
20-AUG-2025
|
F.C. suit was called. Plaintiff called absent. Learned counsel for the plaintiff is present and filed application for adjournment at Exh-53/- order on it. Allowed in the interest of justice. The defendants called absent. Learned counsel for the defendant is present. Learned DDA for the official defendants is present. Order passed on separate sheet, as per order, plaintiff is debarred from filing objection on application u/o 39 rule (3) CPC. Put up on-----16-09-2025 for the plaintiffs evidence/Hearing on the application under Order 39, Rule 3 of the C.P.C |
For Evidence |
0 |
0 |
SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge I, Mirpurkhas
|
30-JUL-2025
|
F.C. suit was called. Plaintiff called absent. Learned counsel for the plaintiff sent application for adjournment through his junior counsel at Exh-52/- order on it. Allowed in the interest of justice. The defendants called absent. Learned counsel for the defendant is called absent while his office clerk is present. Learned DDA for the official defendants is present. Put up on--------------------20-08-2025 for the plaintiffs evidence and objections on the application under Order 39, Rule 3 of the C.P.C |
For Evidence |
0 |
0 |
SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge I, Mirpurkhas
|
14-JUL-2025
|
Presiding officer is on casual leave. F.C. suit was called. Plaintiff called absent. Learned counsel for the plaintiff called absent while his office associate is present. The defendants called absent. Learned counsel for the defendant is called absent while his junior counsel is present. Learned DDA for the official defendants is present. Put up on---30-07-2025 for the plaintiffs evidence and objections on the application under Order 39, Rule 3 of the C.P.C |
For Evidence |
0 |
0 |
SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge I, Mirpurkhas
|
27-MAY-2025
|
F.C. suit was called. Plaintiff called absent. Learned counsel for the plaintiff sent application for adjournment through his office clerk at Exh-51/- order on it. Allowed in the interest of justice. The defendants called absent. Learned counsel for the defendant is called absent while his office associate is present. Learned DDA for the official defendants is present. Put up on---14-07-2025 for the plaintiffs evidence and objections on the application under Order 39, Rule 3 of the C.P.C |
For Evidence |
0 |
0 |
SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge I, Mirpurkhas
|
16-MAY-2025
|
F.C. suit was called. Plaintiff called absent. Learned counsel for the plaintiff is present and filed application for adjournment at Exh-50/- order on it. Allowed. The defendants called absent. Learned counsel for the defendant is present. Learned DDA for the official defendants is present. Put up on---27-05-2025 for the plaintiffs evidence and objections on the application under Order 39, Rule 3 of the C.P.C |
For Evidence |
0 |
0 |
SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge I, Mirpurkhas
|
22-APR-2025
|
F.C. suit was called. Plaintiff called absent. Learned counsel for the plaintiff called absent while his office clerk is present. The defendants called absent. Learned counsel for the defendant called absent while his office clerk is present. Learned DDA for the official defendants is present. Court proceedings are suspended due to strict announced by advocates of DBA MPS. Put up on---16-05-2025 for the plaintiffs evidence and objections on the application under Order 39, Rule 3 of the C.P.C |
For Evidence |
0 |
0 |
SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge I, Mirpurkhas
|
26-MAR-2025
|
"The F.C. suit was called. The plaintiff was present, along with the learned counsel for the plaintiff. The defendants were absent. The learned counsel for the defendant, Mr. Mir Pervaiz Akhtar Advocate, was also absent, while his office associate was present. The learned DDA for the official defendants was present. The matter could not proceed due to an electricity problem. Put up on 22-04-2025 for the plaintiff???s evidence and objections on the application under Order 39, Rule 3 of the C.P.C |
For Evidence |
0 |
0 |
SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge I, Mirpurkhas
|
05-MAR-2025
|
F.C suit called. Plaintiff called absent. Learned counsel for plaintiff called absent while his office is present. Defendants called absent. Learned counsel for defendant Mr. Mir Pervaiz Akhtar Advocate called absent while his office clerk is present. Learned DDA for official defendants is present. Today full day strike announced by advocate of DBA MPS. Put up to--------------------------------------------26-03-2025 for evidence of plaintiff side/ Objection on application u/o 39 rule 3 C.P.C. |
For Evidence |
0 |
0 |
SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge I, Mirpurkhas
|
25-FEB-2025
|
F.C suit called. Plaintiff called absent. Learned counsel for plaintiff called absent while his office is present. Defendants called absent. Learned counsel for defendant Mr. Mir Pervaiz Akhtar Advocate called absent while his office clerk is present. Learned DDA for official defendants is present. Today full day strike announced by advocate of DBA MPS. Put up to--------------------------------------------05-03-2025 for evidence of plaintiff side/ Objection on application u/o 39 rule 3 C.P.C. |
Compliance |
0 |
0 |
SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge I, Mirpurkhas
|