12-NOV-2026
|
|
For Evidence |
0 |
0 |
SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Matli
|
05-NOV-2026
|
Suit called. Plaintiff Mir Shahid Talpur called absent but his counsel Mr. Abdul Haque Laghari is present. Defendant No.5 Asif Ali Shah, Defendant No.6 Imran Ali Shah and defendant No. 7 Naeem Raja called absent but their counsel Mr. Suraj-ul- Haque Memon is present and filed statement to straight away argue on application U/O 1 rule 10 CPC at Ex. 54, order passed on it. File. He also filed statement along with relevant case law at Ex. 55, order passed on it. File. DDA is present. Applicant/intervener namely Salleh Muhammad called absent but his counsel Mr. Ahsan Ali Bhurgari is present and submitted relevant case law at Ex. 56, order passed on it. File. Counsel for plaintiff submitted his no objections on application U/O 1 rule 10 CPC. Heard arguments on application U/O 1 rule 10 CPC. Put off to--------12.11.2026 for evidence of plaintiff side, hearing on application u/o 39 rule 1 & 2 CPC at Ex. 02 so also order on application U/O 1 rule 10 CPC. |
For Evidence |
0 |
0 |
SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Matli
|
26-OCT-2026
|
Suit called. Plaintiff Mir Shahid Talpur called absent but his counsel Mr. Abdul Haque Laghari is present. Defendant No.5 Asif Ali Shah, Defendant No.6 Imran Ali Shah and defendant No. 7 Naeem Raja called absent but their counsel Mr. Suraj-ul- Haque Memon is present. DDA is present. Applicant/intervener namely Salleh Muhammad is present but his counsel Mr. Ahsan Ali Bhurgari called absent. PW-04 namely Balchand is present, recalled and reaffirmed PW-04 and his cross examination recorded. Put off to--------05.11.2026 for evidence of plaintiff side, hearing on application u/o 39 rule 1 & 2 CPC at Ex. 02 so also objections on application U/O 1 rule 10 CPC. |
For Evidence |
.5 |
1 |
SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Matli
|
12-OCT-2026
|
Suit called. Plaintiff Mir Shahid Talpur and his counsel Mr. Abdul Haque Laghari are present. Defendant No.5 Asif Ali Shah, Defendant No.6 Imran Ali Shah and defendant No. 7 Naeem Raja called absent but their counsel Mr. Suraj-ul- Haque Memon is present. DDA is present. Recalled and reaffirmed PW-03 Mir Shahid and his cross examination recorded. Junior counsel of Mr. Ahsan Ali Bhurgari advocate is present and filed application U/O 1 rule 10 CPC along with its supporting affidavit on behalf of applicant/intervener namely Saleh Muhammad along with his vakalatnama at Ex. 51 to Ex. 53, order passed thereon. Notice to other side. Copy received by other side. Put off to--------26.10.2026 for cross examination of PW-04 and further evidence of plaintiff side and hearing on application u/o 39 rule 1 & 2 CPC at Ex. 02 so also objections on application U/O 1 rule 10 CPC. |
For Evidence |
.5 |
1 |
SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Matli
|
05-OCT-2026
|
Suit called. Plaintiff Mir Shahid Talpur called absent but his counsel Mr. Abdul Haque Laghari is present and filed adjournment application at Ex. 50, order passed on it. Granted as last and final chance. Defendant No.5 Asif Ali Shah, Defendant No.6 Imran Ali Shah and defendant No. 7 Naeem Raja called absent but their counsel Mr. Suraj-ul- Haque Memon is present. DDA is present. Put off to--------12.10.2026 for cross examination of PW-04 and further evidence of plaintiff side and hearing on application u/o 39 rule 1 & 2 CPC at Ex. 02. |
For Evidence |
0 |
0 |
SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Matli
|
21-SEP-2026
|
Suit called. Plaintiff Mir Shahid Talpur called absent but his counsel Mr. Abdul Haque Laghari is present. Defendant No.5 Asif Ali Shah, Defendant No.6 Imran Ali Shah and defendant No. 7 Naeem Raja and their counsel Mr. Suraj-ul- Haque Memon are called absent. DDA is present. Examination in chief of PW-04 Balchand recorded at Ex. 49. In the interest of justice matter is adjourned. Put off to--------05.10.2026 for cross examination of PW-04 and further evidence of plaintiff side and hearing on application u/o 39 rule 1 & 2 CPC at Ex. 02. |
For Evidence |
0 |
0 |
SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Matli
|
07-SEP-2026
|
Suit called. Plaintiff Mir Shahid Talpur called absent but his counsel Mr. Abdul Haque Laghari is present. Defendant No.5 Asif Ali Shah, Defendant No.6 Imran Ali Shah and defendant No. 7 Naeem Raja are called absent but their counsel Mr. Suraj-ul- Haque Memon is present. DDA is present. P.O is on Training. Put off to--------21.09.2026 for evidence of plaintiff side and Argument on application u/o 39 rule 1 & 2 CPC at Ex. 02. |
For Evidence |
0 |
0 |
SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Matli
|
24-AUG-2026
|
Suit called. Plaintiff Mir Shahid Talpur called absent but his counsel Mr. Abdul Haque Laghari is present. Defendant No.5 Asif Ali Shah, Defendant No.6 Imran Ali Shah and defendant No. 7 Naeem Raja called absent but their counsel Mr. Suraj-ul- Haque Memon is present. DDA called absent. In the interest of justice matter is adjourned. Put off to-------------------07.09.2026 for evidence of plaintiff side and Argument on application u/o 39 rule 1 & 2 CPC at Ex. 02 . |
For Evidence |
0 |
0 |
SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Matli
|
10-AUG-2026
|
Suit called. Plaintiff Mir Shahid Talpur and his counsel Mr. Abdul Haque Laghari are present. Defendant No.5 Asif Ali Shah, Defendant No.6 Imran Ali Shah and defendant No. 7 Naeem Raja and their counsel Mr. Suraj-ul- Haque Memon are called absent. DDA is present. Due to strike by Bar counsel matter is adjourend. Put off to-------------------24.08.2026 for evidence of plaintiff side and Argument on application u/o 39 rule 1 & 2 CPC at Ex. 02 . |
For Evidence |
0 |
0 |
SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Matli
|
27-JUL-2026
|
Suit called. Plaintiff Mir Shahid Talpur and his counsel Mr. Abdul Haque Laghari are present. Defendant No.5 Asif Ali Shah, Defendant No.6 Imran Ali Shah and defendant No. 7 Naeem Raja are called absent but their counsel Mr. Suraj-ul- Haque Memon is present. DDA is present. Examination in chief of plaintiff PW-03 Mir Shahid recorded at Ex. 47, he produced original sale agreement dated: 12.10.2022 at Ex. 48. Thereafter Abdul Khalique S/O Muhammad Umar Khaskheli appeared in witness box, however he declined to depose on oath. Since the evidence not given on oath is inadmissible in law, his statement could not be recorded. The learned counsel for the plaintiff is directed to proceed further in accordance with law. Put off to-------------------10.08.2026 for evidence of plaintiff side and Argument on application u/o 39 rule 1 & 2 CPC at Ex. 02 . |
For Evidence |
0 |
0 |
SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Matli
|