| Hearing Date | Diary | Status | Units / Application | Witness | Court |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03-FEB-2026 Restored (1) |
For Final Arguments | 0 | 0 | ADJ IV, Larkana | |
| 29-JAN-2026 Restored (1) |
Case called. Matter was fixed today for arguments. Accused Liaquat Ali and Ibraheem are present on bail. ADPP and counsel for the complainant are present. Counsel for accused Muhammad Ibrahim is present. Counsel for accused Liaquat Ali is not in attendance. Adjournment application has been received on his behalf through his associate partner, on the ground that, he is busy before High Court, Larkana counsel for complainant opposed the adjournment by submitting that, it is delaying tactic on the part of the accused. He further submitted that, there are directions of High Court to proceed with the matter on day-t day basis and decided within one month. The said period has already been expired. Record shows that, after remand of the case, statements of accused have been recorded but yet final arguments have not been made. However, in the interest of justice, so that counsel for accused be heard before deciding the matter, the matter is adjourned. It may clear that, in case accused side failed to submit their arguments on next date of hearing, the matter shall be preceded in accordance with law without granting further adjournments. Put off to 03-02-2026 for final arguments. Present accused are directed to attend. | For Hearing | 0 | 0 | ADJ IV, Larkana |
| 23-JAN-2026 Restored (1) |
Case called. Accused Liaquat Ali and Ibraheem are present on bail. Their counsels are not in attendance. Mr.Ahsan Ahmed Qureshi Counsel of complainant called absent his associate is present. Learned ADPP for state is present. Verification report of Medical record already received from MS Red Crescent General Hospital on 20-01-2026.Today matter is fixed for orders on application for expunge the question from the statements of the accused and application under Section 497(5) Cr.P.C. Both application are dismissed. Put off to 29.01.2026 for final arguments. Present accused and complainant are directed to attend with directions to appear a/w their counsels to submit final arguments. | Hearing of Misc. Applications | 0 | 0 | ADJ IV, Larkana |
| 19-JAN-2026 Restored (1) |
Case called. Accused Liaquat Ali and Ibraheem are present on bail. Their counsels are present. Counsel for complainant and ADPP are present. Counsel for both accused filed application for expunge the questions from the statements of accused. Counsel for complainant and ADPP waived the notice of the said application. Heard counsels on that application. Counsels for both sides also argued on application under Section 497(5) Cr.P.C. Verification report of medical record of the accused Ibraheem submitted on previous date has not been received. Office is directed to issue reminder to concerned hospital. Put off to 23.01.2026 for orders application for expunge the question from the statements of the accused and application under Section 497(5) Cr.P.C and report of concerned hospital. A copy of order 24-12-2025 in transfer application received from Honourable High court of sindh circuit court larkana vide Tr.Appln.S-53/2025 re- Muhammad Ibrahim VS The state in which transfer application is dismissed. | For Final Arguments | 0 | 0 | ADJ IV, Larkana |
| 12-JAN-2026 Restored (1) |
Case called. Accused Liaquat Ali is present on bail. Accused Muhammad Ibrahim is not in attendance. Co-accused Liaquat Ali filed application for condonation of absence of co-accused Muhammad Ibrahim on the ground that he is admitted in hospital. He alongwith application annexed record of hospital viz. Red Crescent General Hospital Latif Abad, Hyderabad. ADPP, counsel for the complainant and counsel for both accused are in attendance. Counsel for complainant filed application with prayer that, medical record of accused Muhammad Ibrahim produced by co-accused Liaquat Ali be got verify as the accused party is playing delaying tactic to proceed with matter. Let the medical record viz. documents be got verify from the Red Crescent General Hospital Latif Abad,Hyderabad to ascertain that accused Muhammad Ibrahim is admitted at there or not. Put off to 19-01-2026, for arguments on application u/s 497(5) Cr.P.C/final arguments. Office is directed to issue such letter to the concerned hospital for their reprt.Present accused is directed attend. | For Final Arguments | 0 | 0 | ADJ IV, Larkana |
| 06-JAN-2026 Restored (1) |
Case called. Accused Liaquat Ali and Mohammad Ibraheem are present on bail. Mr. Safdar Ali Bhutto Advocate for accused Mohammad Ibraheem and Mr. Habibullah Ghouri advocate for accused Liaquat Ali are in attendance. ADPP and Mr. Ahsan Ahmed Qureshi advocate for complainant are also in attendance alongwith complainant. Counsel for complainant filed statement alongwith copy of order of Honourable Supreme Court whereby the Criminal petition No.203-K of 2025 filed by the accused side against the order of Honourable High Court whereby the transfer application filed by the accused side has been dismissed. Mr. Habibullah Advocate for accused Liaquat Ali filed adjourned application by stating that, he has just come to know about dismissal of the Criminal petition by the Honourable Supreme Court. He and Mr. Safdar Ali Bhutto Advocate for accused Mohammad Ibraheem prayed for time to submit final arguments in the matter. Counsel for complainant stated that, matter is old one and directions of the Honourable High and Supreme Court are there to decide the matter within one month. Both counsels for the accused undertook to proceed with matter on the next date of hearing. In the interest of justice single opportunity is given to the accused for advancing their arguments and proceeding with the matter. With consent of both sides, the date is fixed as 12.01.2026 and time has also been fixed as 11:00am. for arguments on application u/s 497(5) Cr.P.C/final arguments. | For Final Arguments | 0 | 0 | ADJ IV, Larkana |
| 22-DEC-2025 Restored (1) |
Case called. Accused Liaquat Ali and Mohammad Ibrahim are present on bail. Mr.Safdar Ali Bhutto advocate for accused Muhammad Ibrahim is not in attendance. Mr.Habibullah Ghouri advocate for accused Liaquat Ali is not in attendance, but his jr.is present. Learned ADPP for the State is present. Complainant Syed Ghualm Murtaza Shah called absent and his counsel Mr.Ahsan Ahmed Qureshi is present. Advocate for accused sent intimation on application through his jr.Order on it. Case is adjourned with suggested date of learned counsels of both sides to 06.01.2026 for arguments on application u/s 497(5) Cr.P.C/final arguments. | For Final Arguments | 0 | 0 | ADJ IV, Larkana |
| 13-DEC-2025 Restored (1) |
Case called. Accused Liaquat Ali and Mohammad Ibrahim are present on bail. Mr.Safdar Ali Bhutto advocate for accused Muhammad Ibrahim is not in attendance. Mr.Habibullah Ghouri advocate for accused Liaquat Ali is not in attendance, but his junior Mr.Faheem Habib Ghouri is present. Learned ADPP for the State is present. Complainant Syed Ghualm Murtaza Shah and his counsel Mr.Ahsan Ahmed Qureshi are present. The P.O is on c/l. Case is adjourned with suggested date of learned counsels of both sides to 22.12.2025 for arguments on application u/s 497(5) Cr.P.C/final arguments. | For Final Arguments | 0 | 0 | ADJ IV, Larkana |
| 05-DEC-2025 Restored (1) |
Case called. Accused Liaquat Ali and Mohammad Ibrahim are present on bail. Mr.Safdar Ali Bhutto advocate for accused Muhammad Ibrahim is not in attendance. Mr.Habibullah Ghouri advocate for accused Liaquat Ali is not in attendance, but his junior Mr.Faheem Habib Ghouri is present. Learned ADPP for the State is present. Complainant Syed Ghualm Murtaza Shah and his counsel Mr.Ahsan Ahmed Qureshi are present. Mr.Faheem Habib Ghouri advocate accused Liaquat Ali stated that transfer application is pending before Honourable Supreme Court but no any order has been passed till yet. Case is adjourned with suggested date of learned counsels of both sides to 13.12.2025 for arguments on application u/s 497(5) Cr.P.C/final arguments. | For Final Arguments | 0 | 0 | ADJ IV, Larkana |
| 26-NOV-2025 Restored (1) |
Case called. Accused Liaquat Ali and Mohammad Ibrahim are present on bail. Mr.Safdar Ali Bhutto advocate for accused Muhammad Ibrahim is not in attendance, his clerk is present. Mr.Habibullah Ghouri advocate for accused Liaquat Ali is not in attendance, but his junior is present. Learned ADPP for the State is present. Complainant Syed Ghualm Murtaza Shah and his counsel Mr.Ahsan Ahmed Qureshi are present. today strike was called by DBA. Case is adjourned with suggested date of learned counsels of both sides to 05.12.2025 for arguments on application u/s 497(5) Cr.P.C/final arguments. Accused are directed to attend. | For Final Arguments | 0 | 0 | ADJ IV, Larkana |