| Hearing Date | Diary | Status | Units / Application | Witness | Court |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20-MAY-2026 Restored (1) |
For Evidence | 0 | 0 | SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge IV, Hyderabad | |
| 22-APR-2026 Restored (1) |
Application U/S 12 (2) CPC is called. Applicant Nabi Bux in application U/S 12 (2) CPC is present. Mr. Muhammad Jameel Khan advocate of applicant Nabi Bux is present. Plaintiff is absent. Learned counsel for plaintiff is also absent. Learned counsel for defendant called absent. As the matter is remanded by the Honourable 8th Additional District Judge, Hyderabad in CRA No:63/2024 (Nabi Bux Vs Fakhr-e-Alam & Ors) with direction to this court to frame issues in 12 (2) CPC application with and after recording evidence of both parties, decide the same in accordance with law. Summons returned served upon Director planing and Deand same is pertain to Planing and Development Control HDA, but called absent. Learned counsel for Director Planing HDA filed application for adjournment at Ex:49. Order on it. Other Official witness Sub-Registrar already requested for supply some documents. Put off to....20-05-2026 for evidence/cross examination of applicant side in application U/S 12 (2) CPC and for evidence official of official witness of Director Planing HDA. | For Evidence | 0 | 0 | SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge IV, Hyderabad |
| 25-MAR-2026 Restored (1) |
Application U/S 12 (2) CPC is called. Applicant Nabi Bux in application U/S 12 (2) CPC is present. Mr. Muhammad Jameel Khan advocate of applicant Nabi Bux is present. Plaintiff is appeared at about 12.25 pm alongwith his counsel. Learned counsel for defendant called absent. As the matter is remanded by the Honourable 8th Additional District Judge, Hyderabad in CRA No:63/2024 (Nabi Bux Vs Fakhr-e-Alam & Ors) with direction to this court to frame issues in 12 (2) CPC application with and after recording evidence of both parties, decide the same in accordance with law. Summons returned served upon Director planing and Deand same is pertain to Planing and Development Control HDA, but called absent. Learned counsel for Director Planing HDA filed application for adjournment at Ex:48. Order on it. Other Official witness Sub-Registrar already requested for supply some documents. Put off to....22-04-2026 for evidence/cross examination of applicant side in application U/S 12 (2) CPC. | For Evidence | 0 | 0 | SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge IV, Hyderabad |
| 10-FEB-2026 Restored (1) |
Application U/S 12 (2) CPC is called. Applicant Nabi Bux in application U/S 12 (2) CPC is present. Mr. Muhammad Jameel Khan advocate of applicant Nabi Bux is present. Plaintiff is present alongwith his counsel. Learned counsel for defendant called absent. As the matter is remanded by the Honourable 8th Additional District Judge, Hyderabad in CRA No:63/2024 (Nabi Bux Vs Fakhr-e-Alam & Ors) with direction to this court to frame issues in 12 (2) CPC application with and after recording evidence of both parties, decide the same in accordance with law. Official of Sindh Building Control Authority is absent, but already filed statement at Ex:47 in which states that suit property does not pertains to Sindh Building Control Authority and same is pertain to Plaining and Development Control, HDA Department. Other Official witness Sub-Registrar already requested for supply some documents. Counsel for applicant submitted affidavit in evidence of applicant Fakhre Alam and witness Kamran. Order passed thereon. Copies of said affidavit in evidences received by advocate Imran Ali Abro. Put off to....25-03-2026 for evidence/cross examination of applicant side in application U/S 12 (2) CPC. Issue summons to witnesses Plaining and Development Control, HDA. | For Evidence | 0 | 0 | SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge IV, Hyderabad |
| 15-JAN-2026 Restored (1) |
Application U/S 12 (2) CPC is aclled. Applicant Nabi Bux in application U/S 12 (2) CPC is present. Mr. Muhammad Jameel Khan advocate of applicant Nabi Bux is present and filed application for adjournment at Ex:48. Order on it. Adjourned with last and final chance. Plaintiff is present alongwith his counsel. Learned counsel for defendant called absent. As the matter is remanded by the Honourable 8th Additional District Judge, Hyderabad in CRA No:63/2024 (Nabi Bux Vs Fakhr-e-Alam & Ors) with direction to this court to frame issues in 12 (2) CPC application with and after recording evidence of both parties, decide the same in accordance with law. Official of Sindh Building Control Authority is absent, but already filed statement at Ex:47 in which states that suit property does not pertains to Sindh Building Control Authority and same is pertain to Plaining and Development Control, HDA Department. Other Official witness Sub-Registrar is present and again requested for supply some documents. Put off to....10.02.2026 for evidence of applicant side in application U/S 12 (2) CPC. Issue summons to witnesses Plaining and Development Control, HDA. | For Evidence | 0 | 0 | SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge IV, Hyderabad |
| 10-DEC-2025 Restored (1) |
P.O is on casual leave. Application U/S 12 (2) CPC is aclled. Applicant Nabi Bux in application U/S 12 (2) CPC is present. Mr. Muhammad Jameel Khan advocate of applicant Nabi Bux is absent, his associate present. Plaintiff is present alongwith his counsel. Learned counsel for defendant called absent. As the matter is remanded by the Honourable 8th Additional District Judge, Hyderabad in CRA No:63/2024 (Nabi Bux Vs Fakhr-e-Alam & Ors) with direction to this court to frame issues in 12 (2) CPC application with and after recording evidence of both parties, decide the same in accordance with law. Official of Sindh Building Control Authority is absent, but already filed statement at Ex:47 in which states that suit property does not pertains to Sindh Building Control Authority and same is pertain to Plaining and Development Control, HDA Department. Other Official witness Sub-Registrar is present and again requested for supply some documents. Put off to....15.01.2026 for evidence of applicant side in application U/S 12 (2) CPC. Issue summons to witnesses Plaining and Development Control, HDA. | For Evidence | 0 | 0 | SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge IV, Hyderabad |
| 19-NOV-2025 Restored (1) |
Work suspended after 11.00 am due tstrike of Sindh Bar Council. Application U/S 12 (2) CPC is aclled. Applicant Nabi Bux in application U/S 12 (2) CPC is present. Mr. Muhammad Jameel Khan advocate of applicant Nabi Bux is present. Plaintiff is present, his counsel called absent. Learned counsel for defendant called absent. As the matter is remanded by the Honourable 8th Additional District Judge, Hyderabad in CRA No:63/2024 (Nabi Bux Vs Fakhr-e-Alam & Ors) with direction to this court to frame issues in 12 (2) CPC application with and after recording evidence of both parties, decide the same in accordance with law. Official of Sindh Building Control Authority is absent, but already filed statement at Ex:47 in which states that suit property does not pertains to Sindh Building Control Authority and same is pertain to Plaining and Development Control, HDA Department. Other Official witness Sub-Registrar is present and again requested for supply some documents. Put off to....10.12.2025 for evidence of applicant side in application U/S 12 (2) CPC. Issue summons to witnesses Plaining and Development Control, HDA. | For Evidence | 0 | 0 | SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge IV, Hyderabad |
| 23-OCT-2025 Restored (1) |
Application U/S 12 (2) CPC is aclled. Applicant Nabi Bux in application U/S 12 (2) CPC is present. Mr. Muhammad Jameel Khan advocate of applicant Nabi Bux is present. Plaintiff is present alongwith his counsel. Learned counsel for defendant called absent. As the matter is remanded by the Honourable 8th Additional District Judge, Hyderabad in CRA No:63/2024 (Nabi Bux Vs Fakhr-e-Alam & Ors) with direction to this court to frame issues in 12 (2) CPC application with and after recording evidence of both parties, decide the same in accordance with law. Official of Sindh Building Control Authority is present and filed statement at Ex:47 in which states that suit property does not pertains to Sindh Building Control Authority and same is pertain to Plaining and Development Control, HDA Department. Order on it. Other Official witness Sub-Registrar is apeared and filed application for grant of time and requested for supply some documents at Ex:48. Order on it. Put off to....19.11.2025 for evidence of applicant side in application U/S 12 (2) CPC. Issue summons to witnesses Plaining and Development Control, HDA. | For Evidence | 0 | 0 | SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge IV, Hyderabad |
| 18-SEP-2025 Restored (1) |
P.O is on earned leave. Application U/S 12 (2) CPC is aclled. Applicant Nabi Bux in application U/S 12 (2) CPC is present. Mr. Muhammad Jameel Khan advocate of applicant Nabi Bux is absent, his associate present. Plaintiff is absent, his counsel present. Learned counsel for defendant called absent. As the matter is remanded by the Honourable 8th Additional District Judge, Hyderabad in CRA No:63/2024 (Nabi Bux Vs Fakhr-e-Alam & Ors) with direction to this court to frame issues in 12 (2) CPC application with and after recording evidence of both parties, decide the same in accordance with law. Official of Sindh Building Control Authority is present. Other witnesses are absent. Put off to....23.10.2025 for evidence of applicant side in application U/S 12 (2) CPC. Issue summons to other witnesses mentioned in application U/O 16 Rule 1 and 2 CPC. | For Evidence | 0 | 0 | SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge IV, Hyderabad |
| 25-AUG-2025 Restored (1) |
Application U/S 12 (2) CPC is aclled. Applicant Nabi Bux in application U/S 12 (2) CPC is present. Mr. Muhammad Jameel Khan advocate of applicant Nabi Bux is also present. Plaintiff is present alongwith his counsel. Learned counsel for defendant called absent. As the matter is remanded by the Honourable 8th Additional District Judge, Hyderabad in CRA No:63/2024 (Nabi Bux Vs Fakhr-e-Alam & Ors) with direction to this court to frame issues in 12 (2) CPC application with and after recording evidence of both parties, decide the same in accordance with law. Summons returned served upon official witnesses. One Mr. Murad Ali Suervising Tapedar Taluka City Hyderabad is appeared and his statement recorded at Ex:45, he produced documents at Ex:45/A to 45/D. Official of Sindh Building Control Authority is appeared and filed application for adjournment at Ex:26. Order on it. Other witnesses are absent. Put off to....18.09.2025 for evidence of applicant side in application U/S 12 (2) CPC. Issue summons to other witnesses mentioned in application U/O 16 Rule 1 and 2 CPC. | For Evidence | .5 | 1 | SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge IV, Hyderabad |