25-NOV-2025
|
|
For Evidence |
0 |
0 |
ADJ II, Naushero Feroze
|
04-NOV-2025
|
Sessions Case No.433/2023 is taken up in open court. Accused Gaibi alias Ajoo, Mubeen and Ghulam Sarwar are present on bail. The State Counsel , Counsel for complainant and Counsels for accused are present. The Complainant is present. No other P.Ws is present. Presiding Officer is on Causal Leave. Case adjourned to 15.11.2025 for evidence. Present accused are directed to attend on the given date of hearing. |
For Evidence |
0 |
0 |
ADJ II, Naushero Feroze
|
21-OCT-2025
|
Sessions Case No.433/2023 is taken up in open court. Accused Gaibi alias Ajoo, Mubeen and Ghulam Sarwar are present on bail. The State Counsel , Counsel for complainant and Counsels for accused are present. The Complainant is present. No other P.Ws is present. By consent Case adjourned to 04.11.2025 for evidence. Present accused are directed to attend on the given date of hearing. |
For Evidence |
0 |
0 |
ADJ II, Naushero Feroze
|
14-OCT-2025
|
Session Case No. 433 of 2023 is taken up. All accused are present on bail. The counsel for accused Ghulam Sarwar Lund is absent. The counsel for accused Gaibi Khan and Mubeen Lund is present. PW Sanaullah is present. The matter is fixed for prosecution evidence. The accused Ghulam Sarwar Lund is advocate by profession and he give his assent to proceed with the prosecution evidence and he has no objection and being practicing lawyer. But the Learned ADPP request for adjournment to go through the prosecution case. The request for learned ADDP is allowed. Matter is adjourned to?????? 21-10-2025, for prosecution evidence. Present accused are directed to attend on the given date of hearing. |
For Evidence |
0 |
0 |
ADJ II, Naushero Feroze
|
25-SEP-2025
|
Sessions Case No.433/2023 is taken up in open court. Accused Gaibi alias Ajoo, Mubeen and Ghulam Sarwar are present on bail. The State Counsel is present, Counsel for complainant and Counsels for accused are called absent. Adjournment application filed by advocate for accused their his junior. Order on it. The Complainant is present. No other P.Ws is present. Case adjourned to 14.10.2025 for evidence. Present accused are directed to attend on the given date of hearing. |
For Evidence |
0 |
0 |
ADJ II, Naushero Feroze
|
30-AUG-2025
|
Sessions Case No.433/2023 is taken up in open court. Accused Gaibi alias Ajoo, Mubeen and Ghulam Sarwar are present on bail. The State Counsel, Counsel for complainant and Counsels for accused are present. The Complainant is present. No other P.Ws is present. Case adjourned to 25.09.2025 for evidence. Present accused are directed to attend on the given date of hearing. |
For Evidence |
0 |
0 |
ADJ II, Naushero Feroze
|
12-AUG-2025
|
Sessions Case No.433/2023 is taken up in open court. Accused Gaibi alias Ajoo, Mubeen and Ghulam Sarwar are present on bail. The State Counsel, Counsel for complainant and Counsels for accused are present. The complainant is present. Cross and re-affirmed of complainant is recorded on oath. Case adjourned to 30.08.2025 for evidence and hearing on application for cancellation of bail of accused Ghulam Sarwar as well as hearing on application u/s 539 Cr.PC. Present accused are directed to attend on the given date of hearing. |
For Evidence |
1 |
1 |
ADJ II, Naushero Feroze
|
22-JUL-2025
|
Sessions Case No.433/2023 is taken up in open court. Accused Gaibi alias Ajoo is present. Accused Mubeen and Ghulam Sarwar are present on bail. The State Counsel, Counsel for complainant and Counsels for accused are present. The complete set of private P.Ws is present. Case adjourned to 27.05.2025 for evidence and hearing on application for cancellation of bail of accused Ghulam Sarwar as well as hearing on application u/s 539 Cr.PC. Present accused and complainant are directed to attend on the given date of hearing. |
For Evidence |
0 |
0 |
ADJ II, Naushero Feroze
|
17-JUN-2025
|
Case called. All the accused are present along with counsel except accused Gaibi Khan. Mr. Suhail Ahmed Sheeno advocate appear and submit application for condonation of absence of accused Gaibi Khan Lund. The Vakalatnama of advocate Suhail Ahmed Sheeno is not bear in the case file but he submit that he is directed from his senior counsel Mr. Imdad Hyder Solangi to file the application for condonation on behalf of accused Gaibi Khan. After perusal and searching the case file no vakalatnama of Mr. Imdad Hyder Solangi advocate in the case file in the open court and learned ADPP. Mr. Imtiaz Hussain Memon advocate in present session case 433 of 2023 FIR No.134 of 2023 on behalf of accused Gaibi Khan and accused Muhammad Nadeem. After searching the case file when it is transpired that Mr. Imtiaz Hussain Memon advocate present in the court is counsel on behalf of accused Gaibi Khan then Mr. Imtiaz Hussain became ready to submit the application for condonation such ignore on the part of counsel cannot be excepted and Mr. Imtiaz Hussain Memon advocate is required to be vigilant in future. Now Mr. Imtiaz Hussain Memon advocate submit application for condonation excuse of accused Gaibi Khan. Now there are two application on behalf of same accused Gaibi Khan showing the reason that he is not felling-well. Today the matter is again fixed for recording the cross examination of the complainant Bahadur who is available on each and every date after recording of examination in chief. The counsel for the accused Mr. Abdul Kareem Luhrani advocate for the accused Ghulam Sarwar again repeat his same reservation as mentioned by him on 27-05-2025. The counsel for the accused Mubeen and Gaibi Khan was called absent on repeated called but he did not appear. Today he appear and after discussion in the court he filed the application for condonation of excuse of accused Gaibi Khan. This court clearly mentioned in the detailed order on dated: 27-05-2025 that at first the cross examination is required to be made by the counsel for the accused Gaibi Khan and Mubeen Lund. Today Mr. Imtiaz Hussain Memon advocate do not cross examine the present witness/complainant Bahadur because of absence of his client/accused Gaibi Khan. He verbally under took to cross examine the present complainant/witness on next date. Since the accused Gaibi Khan chosen to remain absent from this court on mere excuse of not feeling-well therefore his absence in the court is nothing but deliberately avoiding to proceed with evidence, therefore taken in view the conduct of accused Gaibi Khan his bail is hereby cancelled. Let the NBW be issued against the accused Gaibi Khan and notice to his surety. Matter adjourned to 22-07-2025, for evidence of prosecution. Present accused and complainant are directed to attend on the given date of hearing. |
For Evidence |
0 |
0 |
ADJ II, Naushero Feroze
|
27-MAY-2025
|
Sessions Case No.433/2023 is called. Accused are present. The counsel for accused Ghulam Sarwar is present. The counsel for accused Mubeen and Gaibi Mr. Imtiaz Hussain is called absent. The opportunity cross examination was extended to the accused and on the last date of hearing the counsel for the accused Mubeen and Gaibi Khan filed an adjournment application and under took the cross examination of complainant. The counsel for the accused Ghulam Sarwar express his reservation about cross examination between the reason that the accused Mubeen and Gaibi khan have entered into the compromise with complainant party as the complainant Bahadar s/o Pir Bux Lund submitted statement through his counsel that he have entered settlement outside of the court with the accused Mubeen. Therefore, in the interest of justice late the accused for Mubeen and Gaibi first cross examination to the complainant so as to clarify the statement regarding settlement with the complainant. Today the counsel for the accused Mubeen is Gaibi is repeatedly called absent despite time fixed and repeated call this is 01.45 PM but no intimation from the accused Mubeen and Gaibi is made to the court. In these circumstances, in the interest of justice the accused Gaibi and Mubeen are granted last opportunity to ensure the required evidence on the next date. Matter is adjourned 17-06-2025, For evidence. Present accused complainant and PW are directed to attend.
|
For Evidence |
0 |
0 |
ADJ II, Naushero Feroze
|