| Hearing Date | Diary | Status | Units / Application | Witness | Court |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27-NOV-2026 |
For Evidence | 0 | 0 | ADJ -I, Sanghar | |
| 12-NOV-2026 |
Case called. Accused Sudheer and Akbar are produce in custody from Superintendent District Prison Sanghar through video link. ADPP for the state and advocate for accused are present. Advocate for complainant also present. No P.W is present. Process returned un-served. Issue fresh summon upon complainant and all required P.Ws including investigation officer. Call case property. In the larger interest of justice. Case adjourned to 27.11.2026 for evidence. Next date communicated to the accused they are present through video link. | For Evidence | 0 | 0 | ADJ -I, Sanghar |
| 29-OCT-2026 |
Case called. Accused Sudheer and Akbar are produce in custody from Superintendent District Prison Sanghar. ADPP for the state and advocate for accused are present. Complainant and his counsel are also present. Today charge framed upon accused Sudheer and Akbar at Ex. 04. Pleas of accused are recorded at Ex.04/A & Ex.04/B. Accused are pleaded not guilty and claimed to be trial. Issue summon upon complainant and all required P.Ws including investigation officer. Call case property. In the larger interest of justice. Case adjourned to 12.11.2026 for evidence. Accused are produced in custody and remanded back to jail with direction to produced through video link on next date of hearing. | For Charge | 0 | 0 | ADJ -I, Sanghar |
| 16-OCT-2026 |
Case called. Accused Sudheer and Akbar are produce in custody from Superintendent District Prison Sanghar. ADPP for the state is present. Complainant and his counsel are called absent. Mr. Meer Mal advocate and Mr. Asim Rasool Sidhu advocate are also present . In the larger interest of justice. Case adjourned to 29.10.2026 for framing of charge. Accused are produced in custody and remanded back to jail with direction to produce on next date of hearing. | For Charge | 0 | 0 | ADJ -I, Sanghar |
| 05-OCT-2026 |
Case called. Accused Sudheer and Akbar are produce in custody from Superintendent District Prison Sanghar. ADPP for the state is present. Complainant Sohrab is present. Mr. Zaffar Hayat advocate filed Vakalatnama on behalf of complainant. Order passed on it. File. Being a capital punishment case could not proceed in absence of defense counsel. Thereafter, both accused filed separate applications with requesting therein for providing advocate in a government expenses. Such order passed thereon. Mr. Meer Mal advocate has been appointed as defense counsel for accused Sudheer to proceed case as per law as per his own choice. Mr. Asim Rasool Sidhu advocate has also been appointed as defense counsel for accused Akbar to proceed case as per law as per his own choice at Ex.01 & Ex.02. Thereafter, in compliance of U/S 265-C CR.P.C case papers supplied to both accused on free of costs vide receipt at Ex.03. In the larger interest of justice. Case adjourned to 16.10.2026 for framing of charge. Accused are produced in custody and remanded back to jail with direction to produce on next date of hearing. |
For Supply of Copies | 0 | 0 | ADJ -I, Sanghar |