| Hearing Date | Diary | Status | Units / Application | Witness | Court |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01-JUL-2026 Restored (1) |
For Evidence | 0 | 0 | ADJ IV, Dadu | |
| 17-JUN-2026 Restored (1) |
The accused 1.Zameer, 2.Dilbar and 3.Khadim are already acquitted u/s 265-H(i) Cr. P.C, vide Judgment dated 14.10.2024 and accused Amjad and Sadar are already declared as P.O. and case against them is already kept on dormant file till their arrest. Accused Rajib Khoso is produced under custody from District Prison Dadu. Learned APG for the State is present. Mr. Mufeed Ahmed Narejo advocate for accused is called absent his partner is present and filed adjournment application. Order passed on it. Complainant Muhammad Aslam is present and directed to attend on next date of hearing. Mr.Mushtaque Ahmed Chandio advocate for complainant is present. Case is adjourned to 01.07.2026 for evidence. Accused Rajib is sent back to same prison with directions to produce him on next date of hearing. | For Evidence | 0 | 0 | ADJ IV, Dadu |
| 03-JUN-2026 Restored (1) |
The accused 1.Zameer, 2.Dilbar and 3.Khadim are already acquitted u/s 265-H(i) Cr. P.C, vide Judgment dated 14.10.2024 and accused Amjad and Sadar are already declared as P.O. and case against them is already kept on dormant file till their arrest. Accused Rajib Khoso is produced under custody from District Prison Dadu. Learned APG for the State is present. Mr. Mufeed Ahmed Narejo advocate for accused is called absent his partner is present and filed adjournment application. Order passed on it. Complainant Muhammad Aslam is present and directed to attend on next date of hearing. Mr.Mushtaque Ahmed Chandio advocate for complainant is present. Case is adjourned to 17.06.2026 for evidence. Accused Rajib is sent back to same prison with directions to produce him on next date of hearing. | For Evidence | 0 | 0 | ADJ IV, Dadu |
| 13-MAY-2026 Restored (1) |
The accused 1.Zameer, 2.Dilbar and 3.Khadim are already acquitted u/s 265-H(i) Cr. P.C, vide Judgment dated 14.10.2024 and accused Amjad and Sadar are already declared as P.O. and case against them is already kept on dormant file till their arrest. Accused Rajib Khoso is produced under custody from District Prison Dadu. Learned APG for the State is present. Mr. Mufeed Ahmed Narejo advocate for accused is called absent his partner is present. Complainant Muhammad Aslam and three PWs are present and directed to attend on next date of hearing. Mr.Mushtaque Ahmed Chandio advocate for complainant is present. Case is adjourned to 03.06.2026 for evidence. Accused Rajib is sent back to same prison with directions to produce him on next date of hearing. P.O. is on casual leave. | For Evidence | 0 | 0 | ADJ IV, Dadu |
| 29-APR-2026 Restored (1) |
The accused 1.Zameer, 2.Dilbar and 3.Khadim are already acquitted u/s 265-H(i) Cr. P.C, vide Judgment dated 14.10.2024 and accused Amjad and Sadar are already declared as P.O. and case against them is already kept on dormant file till their arrest. Accused Rajib Khoso is produced under custody from District Prison Dadu. Learned APG for the State is present. Mr. Mufeed Ahmed Narejo advocate for accused is present. Complainant Muhammad Aslam and other PWs are called. Mr.Mushtaque Ahmed Chandio advocate for complainant is present. Case is adjourned to 13.05.2026 for evidence. Issue summons to Complainant and private PWs. Accused Rajib is sent back to same prison with directions to produce him on next date of hearing. | For Evidence | 0 | 0 | ADJ IV, Dadu |
| 15-APR-2026 Restored (1) |
The accused 1.Zameer, 2.Dilbar and 3.Khadim are already acquitted u/s 265-H(i) Cr. P.C, vide Judgment dated 14.10.2024 and accused Amjad and Sadar are already declared as P.O. and case against them is already kept on dormant file till their arrest. Accused Rajib Khoso is produced under custody from District Prison Dadu. Learned APG for the State is present. Mr. Mufeed Ahmed Narejo advocate for accused is absent his partner is present. Complainant Muhammad Aslam and PW Muhammad Azeem are present. Mr.Mushtaque Ahmed Chandio advocate for complainant is present. Case is adjourned to 29.04.2026 for evidence. Complainant and present PW are directed to attend. Accused Rajib is sent back to same prison with directions to produce him on next date of hearing. | For Evidence | 0 | 0 | ADJ IV, Dadu |
| 25-MAR-2026 Restored (1) |
The accused 1.Zameer, 2.Dilbar and 3.Khadim are already acquitted u/s 265-H(i) Cr. P.C, vide Judgment dated 14.10.2024 and accused Amjad and Sadar are already declared as P.O. and case against them is already kept on dormant file till their arrest. Accused Rajib Khoso is produced under custody from District Prison Dadu. Learned APG for the State is present. Mr. Mufeed Ahmed Narejo advocate for accused is absent his partner is present and filed adjournment application. Complainant Muhammad Aslam and PW Muhammad Azeem arepresent. Mr.Mushtaque Ahmed Chandio advocate for complainant is present. Case is adjourned to 15.04.2026 for evidence. Issue summons to remaining private PWs. Accused Rajib is sent back to same prison with directions to produce him on next date of hearing. | For Evidence | 0 | 0 | ADJ IV, Dadu |
| 19-MAR-2026 Restored (1) |
The accused 1.Zameer, 2.Dilbar and 3.Khadim are already acquitted u/s 265-H(i) Cr. P.C, vide Judgment dated 14.10.2024 and accused Amjad and Sadar are already declared as P.O. and case against them is already kept on dormant file till their arrest. Accused Rajib Khoso is produced under custody from District Prison Dadu. Learned APG for the State is present. Mr. Mufeed Ahmed Narejo advocate for accused is absent his partner is present. Complainant is absent. Mr.Mushtaque Ahmed Chandio advocate for complainant is absent. Case is adjourned to 25.03.2026 for evidence. Issue summons to complainant and PWs. Accused Rajib is sent back to same prison with directions to produce him on next date of hearing. | For Evidence | 0 | 0 | ADJ IV, Dadu |
| 16-MAR-2026 |
wrongly entered | For Evidence | 0 | 0 | ADJ IV, Dadu |
| 11-MAR-2026 |
The accused 1.Zameer, 2.Dilbar and 3.Khadim are already acquitted u/s 265-H(i) Cr. P.C, vide Judgment dated 14.10.2024 and accused Amjad and Sadar are already declared as P.O. and case against them is already kept on dormant file till their arrest. Accused Rajib Khoso is produced under custody from District Prison Dadu and submitted application for providing advocate to him. Order passed on it. Learned APG for the State is present. Complainant is absent. Mr.Mushtaque Ahmed Chandio advocate for complainant is absent. Mr.Mufeed Ahmed Narejo advocate (pauper) provide to accused. Mr. Mufeed Ahmed Narejo advocate filed vakalatnama on behalf of accused Rajib Khoso. Charge framed against accused at Exh.No.02. Plea of guilt recorded at Exh.No.2/A, to which accused pleaded not guilty and claimed for trial. Case is adjourned to 19.03.2026 for evidence. Issue summons to PWs. Accused Rajib is sent back to same prison with directions to produce him on next date of hearing. | For Supply of Copies | 0 | 0 | ADJ IV, Dadu |