| Hearing Date | Diary | Status | Units / Application | Witness | Court |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26-NOV-2026 Restored (1) |
For Evidence | 0 | 0 | SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Warrah | |
| 12-NOV-2026 Restored (1) |
Suit called. The plaintiff called absent along with his learned counsel. Defendant No. 01 is called absent and has already been debarred from filing his written statement. Defendant No. 02 is called absent; however, he has already filed his written statement in person. Defendant No. 03 is called absent, but his learned counsel called present. Defendants No. 04 and 05 have already been debarred from filing their written statements. Official defendant No. 06 is called absent but has already filed his written statement on his own behalf as well as on behalf of defendant No.12. Defendant No. 07 has already filed his written statement. Defendant No. 08 is called absent but has already filed his written statement. Defendants No. 09 and 10, despite service, are called absent. Defendants No.11 and 12, despite service, are called absent; however, they have already filed their written statements. Defendant No.13 is called absent. Defendant No.14 is called absent but has already filed his written statement. The learned DDA is absent on behalf of the official defendants and has already filed a statement adopting the written statement of official defendant No. 06 on behalf of defendants No. 09, 10, 12 and 13. The transfer application is pending from Honourable Additional Sessions Judge-II,Kamber on the date of hearing.19.11.2026. The matter is adjourned to 26.11.2026 for further evidence of the plaintiff and arguments on the application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC. | For Evidence | 0 | 0 | SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Warrah |
| 03-NOV-2026 Restored (1) |
Suit called. The plaintiff called absent along with his learned counsel. One Zain-Ul-Abiddin son of plaintiff is present and submitted adjournment application for absence of plaintiff. Order on it. Condoned. Defendant No. 01 is called absent and has already been debarred from filing his written statement. Defendant No. 02 is called absent; however, he has already filed his written statement in person. Defendant No. 03 is called absent, but his learned counsel called present. Defendants No. 04 and 05 have already been debarred from filing their written statements. Official defendant No. 06 is called absent but has already filed his written statement on his own behalf as well as on behalf of defendant No.12. Defendant No. 07 has already filed his written statement. Defendant No. 08 is called absent but has already filed his written statement. Defendants No. 09 and 10, despite service, are called absent. Defendants No.11 and 12, despite service, are called absent; however, they have already filed their written statements. Defendant No.13 is called absent. Defendant No.14 is called absent but has already filed his written statement. The learned DDA is present on behalf of the official defendants and has already filed a statement adopting the written statement of official defendant No. 06 on behalf of defendants No. 09, 10, 12 and 13. The matter is adjourned to 12.11.2026 for further evidence of the plaintiff and arguments on the application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC. | For Evidence | 0 | 0 | SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Warrah |
| 27-OCT-2026 Restored (1) |
Suit called. The plaintiff and his witness, Saifullah, are present along with their learned counsel. Defendant No. 01 is called absent and has already been debarred from filing his written statement. Defendant No. 02 is called absent; however, he has already filed his written statement in person. Defendant No. 03 is called absent along with his learned counsel. Defendants No. 04 and 05 have already been debarred from filing their written statements. Official defendant No. 06 is called absent but has already filed his written statement on his own behalf as well as on behalf of defendant No.12 and Tapedar Prem Chand is present. Defendant No. 07 has already filed his written statement. Defendant No. 08 is called absent but has already filed his written statement. Defendants No. 09 and 10, despite service, are called absent. Defendants No. 11 and 12, despite service, are called absent; however, they have already filed their written statements. Defendant No. 13 is called absent. Defendant No. 14 is called absent but has already filed his written statement. The learned DDA is present on behalf of the official defendants and has already filed a statement adopting the written statement of official defendant No. 06 on behalf of defendants No. 09, 10, 12 and 13. The cross-examination of the plaintiff is recorded at Ex. No. 48, while the cross-examination of witness Saifullah is recorded at Ex. No. 50. The matter is adjourned to 03.11.2026 for further evidence of the plaintiff and arguments on the application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC. | For Evidence | 0 | 0 | SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Warrah |
| 20-OCT-2026 Restored (1) |
Suit called. The plaintiff and his witness, Saifullah, were present along with their learned counsel. Defendant No. 01 was called absent and had already been debarred from filing his written statement. Defendant No. 02 was called absent; however, he had already filed his written statement in person. Defendant No. 03 was called absent along with his learned counsel. Defendants No. 04 and 05 had already been debarred from filing their written statements. Official defendant No. 06 was absent; however, Tapedar Prem Chand was present and, through the learned DDA, filed objections to the application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 CPC. He also submitted an authority letter issued by the Mukhtiarkar, Warah, and had already submitted a written statement on behalf of official defendant No. 06 as well as defendant No. 12. Order thereon. Filed. Defendant No. 07 had already filed his written statement. Defendant No. 08 had already submitted his written statement but was called absent. Defendants No. 09 and 10, despite service, were called absent. Defendants No. 11 and 12, despite service, were called absent; however, they had already filed their written statements. Defendant No. 13 was called absent. Defendant No. 14 was called absent but had already filed his written statement. The learned DDA was present on behalf of the official defendants and had already submitted a statement adopting the written statement of official defendant No. 06 on behalf of defendants No. 09, 10, 12 and 13. Put off to 27.10.2026 for plaintiff???s evidence/cross-examination and arguments on the application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC. | For Evidence | 0 | 0 | SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Warrah |
| 10-OCT-2026 Restored (1) |
Suit called. Plaintiff and witness Saifullah are present, along with his counsel. The defendant No.01 called absent and already de-barred. The defendant No. 02 is called absent and already filed W.S in person. The defendant No. 03 called absent, along with his counsel. The defendants No. 04 and 05 already de-barred. The official defendant No. 06 absent and already sent his W.S on his behalf as well as on behalf of defendant No.12. The defendant No.07 already filed W.S. The defendant No.08 already sent W.S but called absent. The defendant No.09, 10 already served but called absent. The defendant No. 11 and 12 served, but called absent and already filed W.S. The defendant No.13 called absent. The defendant No.14 called absent and already filed W.S. The DDA called absent on behalf of official defendants and already submitted statement adopting W.S of defendant No. 06 on behalf of defendants No. 09,10,12 and 13. Witness Saifullah chief is recorded at Ex.No. The DDA called absent and cross is reserved till next dat of hearing. Put off to 20.10.2026 for plaintiff evidence/Cross and arguments on application u/o 39 rule 1 CPC. | For Evidence | .5 | 1 | SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Warrah |
| 05-OCT-2026 Restored (1) |
Suit called. Plaintiff called present, along with his counsel. The defendant No.01 called absent and already de-barred. The defendant No. 02 is called absent and already filed W.S in person. The defendant No. 03 called absent, along with his counsel. The defendants No. 04 and 05 already de-barred. The official defendant No. 06 absent and already sent his W.S on his behalf as well as on behalf of defendant No.12. The defendant No.07 already filed W.S. The defendant No.08 already sent W.S but called absent. The defendant No.09, 10 already served but called absent. The defendant No. 11 and 12 served, but called absent and already filed W.S. The defendant No.13 called absent. The defendant No.14 called absent and already filed W.S. The DDA called present on behalf of official defendants and already submitted statement adopting W.S of defendant No. 06 on behalf of defendants No. 09,10,12 and 13 and filed adjournment application. Order on it. Time granted. Put off to 10.10.2026 for plaintiff evidence/Cross and arguments on application u/o 39 rule 1 CPC. | For Evidence | 0 | 0 | SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Warrah |
| 28-SEP-2026 Restored (1) |
Suit called. Plaintiff called present, along with his counsel. The defendant No.01 called absent and already de-barred. The defendant No. 02 is called absent and already filed W.S in person. The defendant No. 03 called absent, along with his counsel. The defendants No. 04 and 05 already de-barred. The official defendant No. 06 absent and already sent his W.S on his behalf as well as on behalf of defendant No.12. The defendant No.07 already filed W.S. The defendant No.08 already sent W.S but called absent. The defendant No.09, 10 already served but called absent. The defendant No. 11 and 12 served, but called absent and already filed W.S. The defendant No.13 called absent. The defendant No.14 called absent and already filed W.S. The DDA called present on behalf of official defendants and already submitted statement adopting W.S of defendant No. 06 on behalf of defendants No. 09,10,12 and 13. Put off to 05.10.2026 for plaintiff evidence/Cross and arguments on application u/o 39 rule 1 CPC. | For Evidence | 0 | 0 | SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Warrah |
| 17-SEP-2026 Restored (1) |
Suit called. Plaintiff called present, along with his counsel and filed adjournment application. The defendant No.01 called absent and already de-barred. The defendant No. 02 is called absent and already filed W.S in person. The defendant No. 03 called absent, but his counsel called present. The defendants No. 04 and 05 already de-barred. The official defendant No. 06 absent and already sent his W.S on his behalf as well as on behalf of defendant No.12. The defendant No.07 already filed W.S. The defendant No.08 already sent W.S but called absent. The defendant No.09, 10 already served but called absent. The defendant No. 11 and 12 served, but called absent and already filed W.S. The defendant No.13 called absent. The defendant No.14 called absent and already filed W.S. The DDA called absent on behalf of official defendants and already submitted statement adopting W.S of defendant No. 06 on behalf of defendants No. 09,10,12 and 13. Put off to 28.09.2026 for plaintiff evidence/Cross and arguments on application u/o 39 rule 1 CPC. | For Evidence | 0 | 0 | SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Warrah |
| 10-SEP-2026 Restored (1) |
Suit called. Plaintiff called absent, along with his counsel and partner counsel called present. The defendant No.01 called absent and already de-barred. The defendant No. 02 is called absent and already filed W.S in person. The defendant No. 03 called absent along with his counsel. The defendants No. 04 and 05 already de-barred. The official defendant No. 06 absent and already sent his W.S on his behalf as well as on behalf of defendant No.12. The defendant No.07 already filed W.S. The defendant No.08 already sent W.S but called absent. The defendant No.09, 10 already served but called absent. The defendant No. 11 and 12 served, but called absent and already filed W.S. The defendant No.13 called absent. The defendant No.14 called absent and already filed W.S. The DDA called absent on behalf of official defendants and already submitted statement adopting W.S of defendant No. 06 on behalf of defendants No. 09,10,12 and 13. Today the strike work of Sindh bar counsel. Put off to 17.09.2026 for plaintiff evidence/Cross and arguments on application u/o 39 rule 1 CPC. | For Evidence | 0 | 0 | SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Warrah |