27-APR-2026
|
|
Compliance |
0 |
0 |
CJJM V, Larkana
|
03-APR-2026
|
Matter called. Plaintiff/Decree Holder (D.H.) is present and her counsel is called absent. Defendant/Judgment Debtor (J.D.) and his counsel are called absent. Matter adjourned due to CP is pending before the Honourable High Court of sindh circuit court Larkana. Put off to 27-04-2026 for compliance. |
Compliance |
0 |
0 |
CJJM V, Larkana
|
27-FEB-2026
|
Matter called. Plaintiff/Decree Holder (D.H.) is called absent and her counsel is present. Defendant/Judgment Debtor (J.D.) is present and his counsel is called absent but his junior is present. Counsel for plaintiff/D.H submit statement that the matter is pending before the Honourable High Court of sindh circuit court Larkana hence this matter may be adjourned, order on it. File. Put off to 03-04-2026 for compliance. |
Compliance |
0 |
0 |
CJJM V, Larkana
|
14-FEB-2026
|
The P.O is on casual leave. Matter called. Plaintiff/Decree Holder (D.H.) is called absent and her counsel is present. Defendant/Judgment Debtor (J.D.) is present and his counsel is called absent. Put off to 27-02-2026 for compliance. |
Compliance |
0 |
0 |
CJJM V, Larkana
|
20-JAN-2026
|
Matter called. Plaintiff/Decree Holder (D.H.) is present and her counsel is called absent but her partner is present. Defendant/Judgment Debtor (J.D.) is produced in civil prison/custody, his counsel is present. Heard. Issue release writ for defendant/JD. Put off to 14-02-2026 for compliance. |
Compliance |
0 |
0 |
CJJM V, Larkana
|
19-JAN-2026
|
The P.O is on casual leave. Matter called. Plaintiff/Decree Holder (D.H.) is present and her counsel is called absent but her partner is present. Defendant/Judgment Debtor (J.D.) is in civil prison/custody, his counsel is present. Issue P.O for defendant/JD. Put off to 20-01-2026 for production of defendant/J.D and compliance. |
Compliance |
0 |
0 |
CJJM V, Larkana
|
10-JAN-2026
|
Matter called. Plaintiff/Decree Holder (D.H.) is present along with her counsel. Defendant/Judgment Debtor (J.D.) has been produced by Jail Authorities in civil prison/custody, his counsel is present. Rupees 2,20,000/- have been returned to defendant/J.D in open court and in presence of his counsel under proper receipt signed by defendant/J.D before the presiding officer. Counsel for defendant/J.D informed this Court that he has challenged the orders of this Court in Constitutional Petition before Honourable High Court of Sindh. Put off to 19-01-2026 for compliance. Custody of defendant/J.D is sent back to Civil Prison/District Jail till further orders. |
Compliance |
0 |
0 |
CJJM V, Larkana
|
05-JAN-2026
|
Matter called. Plaintiff/Decree Holder (D.H.) along with her learned counsel is present. Defendant/Judgment Debtor (J.D.) is in civil prison/custody, his counsel is called absent. It has been informed by the clerk of this Court that defendant/J.D and his counsel have still not taken the deposited amount. Therefore, office is directed to issue production order to Jail Authorities for defendant/J.D. Put off to 10-01-2026 for production of defendant/J.D and compliance. |
Compliance |
0 |
0 |
CJJM V, Larkana
|
29-DEC-2025
|
Matter called. Plaintiff/Decree Holder (D.H.) along with her learned counsel is present. Defendant/Judgment Debtor (J.D.) along with his learned counsel is also present. It stands established on record that the judgment and decree passed by this Court dated 27-10-2025 have been affirmed by the Honourable VI-Additional District Judge, Larkana, vide order dated 22-12-2025. Consequently, the judgment debtor is legally and unequivocally bound to comply with the lawful directions of this Court by restoring the dowry articles to the decree holder in their original form, as decreed. The judgment, decree, and execution proceedings have thus attained finality, and the obligation of the judgment debtor is no longer open to question. Despite repeated opportunities and clear directions issued by this Court in exercise of its execution jurisdiction, the judgment debtor has willfully failed to satisfy the decree. Demand notices were duly issued, explicitly warning the judgment debtor that in the event of continued non-compliance, coercive measures under law, including detention in civil prison, would be adopted. Notwithstanding the same, the judgment debtor has neither complied with the decree nor shown any bona fide intention to do so. Today again, the judgment debtor was specifically called upon to return the dowry articles; however, he failed to furnish any satisfactory or positive response. Instead, a request was made through learned counsel for issuance of a show-cause notice. Considering the admitted record, including repeated demand notices already issued and ignored, this Court is of the considered view that issuance of a further show-cause notice would be a mere formality and would not advance the cause of justice. It is further observed that no movable or immovable property is available in the name of the judgment debtor for attachment. When questioned by the Court as to whether he would furnish any surety or provide any undertaking to secure compliance with the decree, the judgment debtor remained silent, which conduct reinforces the inference of deliberate and contumacious non-compliance. This Court remains mindful that Family Courts are constituted under the Family Courts Act, 1964, to ensure expeditious disposal of family disputes and to provide effective and speedy relief, particularly to women who are otherwise vulnerable to prolonged litigation. The decree holder, a poor lady, has been consistently appearing before this Court and has been deprived of her dowry articles despite the decree in her favour having attained finality. The continued non-compliance by the judgment debtor has defeated the very object and spirit of the Family Courts Act and has caused undue hardship and harassment to the decree holder. The willful disobedience of the judgment debtor warrants adoption of coercive execution measures to ensure enforcement of the lawful judgment and decree of this Court. The dignity of the Court and the sanctity of its judgments cannot be rendered illusory. In view of the foregoing circumstances, and finding no other effective mode available for satisfaction of the decree, this Court is constrained to adopt coercive measures. Accordingly, the judgment debtor is ordered to be detained in Civil Prison and be committed to District Prison, Larkana, for a period of one year or until compliance of the decree or further orders of this Court, whichever is earlier. He shall be dealt with strictly in accordance with law and shall be produced before this Court as and when so directed. Put off to 05-01-2026 for further. |
Compliance |
0 |
0 |
CJJM V, Larkana
|
23-DEC-2025
|
Matter called. Plaintiff/DH and her counsel are present. Defendant/JD and his counsel are called absent. Put off to 29-12-2025 for arguments and compliance. |
Compliance |
0 |
0 |
CJJM V, Larkana
|