Hearing(s) Detail

Civil Revisions 25/2025, Sharif Muhammad Khan V/S Abdul Khalique & Others

Hearing(s) Detail

Hearing Date Diary Status Units / Application Witness Court
04-FEB-2026
For Arguments 0 0 ADJ II, Mirpurkhas
15-JAN-2026
Matter called. Appellant is absent. One Bheram Ali (Attorney) is present. Counsel for appellant is present. Respondents No 1(i) (Agedino) is absent(who is attorney of all remaining private respondents) His counsel is present. DDA for official respondents is present. Arguments already heard from both the sides. Case laws not submitted, In the great interest of justice, adjourned. Put off to 04-2-2026 for Order and production of case laws. For Arguments 0 0 ADJ II, Mirpurkhas
05-JAN-2026
Matter called. Appellant is absent..Counsel for appellant is present. Respondents No 1(i) (Agedino) is absent(who is attorney of all remaining private respondents) His counsel is present. DDA for official respondents is present. Arguments heard from both the sides. Put off to 15-1-2026 for Order and production of case laws. For Arguments 0 0 ADJ II, Mirpurkhas
18-DEC-2025
Matter called. Appellant is absent..Counsel for appellant is present. Respondents No 1(i) (Agedino) is absent(who is attorney of all remaining private respondents) His counsel is absent and he has sent adjournment application at Ex...... Order on it. DDA for official respondents No. 7 and 8 is present. Perusal of diaries shows that matter is being adjourned for arguments since long. Both the parties are required to ensure argument, failing which on the part of either party, appropriate order will be passed accordingly. By consent, adjourned. Put off to 05-1-2026 for arguments. For Arguments 0 0 ADJ II, Mirpurkhas
04-DEC-2025
Matter called. Appellant is present in person.Counsel for appellant is present. Respondents No 1(i) (Agedino) is absent(who is attorney of all remaining private respondents) His counsel is absent and he has sent adjournment application. Order on it. DDA for official respondents No. 7 and 8 is present. Perusal of diaries shows that matter is being adjourned for arguments since long. Both the parties are required to ensure argument, failing which on the part of either party, appropriate order will be passed accordingly. By consent, adjourned. Put off to 18-12-2025 for arguments. For Arguments 0 0 ADJ II, Mirpurkhas
20-NOV-2025
The work has been suspended due to strike called by DBA Mirpurkhas. Matter called. Appellant is absent. His attorney Behram is absent. Counsel for appellant is present. Respondents No 1(i) (Agedino) is absent(who is attorney of all remaining private respondents) His counsel is present. DDA for official respondents No. 7 and 8 is present. By consent, adjourned. Put off to 04-12-2025 for arguments. For Arguments 0 0 ADJ II, Mirpurkhas
10-NOV-2025
Matter called. Appellant is absent. His attorney Behram is absent. Counsel for appellant is present. Respondents No 1(i) (Agedino) is absent(who is attorney of all remaining private respondents) DDA for official respondents No. 7 and 8 is present. Counsel for private respondents is absent and he has sent adjournment application at Ex.....Order on it. Put off to 20-11-2025 for arguments. For Arguments 0 0 ADJ II, Mirpurkhas
27-OCT-2025
Matter called. Appellant is absent. His attorney Behram is absent. Counsel for appellant is present and filed application for extension of status-quo at Ex........Order on it . Respondents No 1(i) (Agedino) is present in person and filed objections on Revision Petition at Ex.........Respondent No.1(i) stated at bar that he is attorney of all remaining private respondents, while DDA appeared for official respondents No. 7 and 8 but objections not filed as yet. Order passed on order sheet and announced in open court. As per order, the service upon all respondents is held good besides it, the objections of main respondent (Agedino) taken on the record who is representing on behalf of remaining private respondents in trial court as per his statement at Bar. However official respondents failed to file objections, hence they are debarred from filing objections as such the instant revision application is fixed for arguments. Put off to 10-11-2025 for arguments. For Service 0 0 ADJ II, Mirpurkhas
11-OCT-2025
Matter called. Appellant is absent. His attorney Behram is present in person. Counsel for appellant is present. Respondents No.7 and 8 are called absent. Process against remaining respondents not returned served or un-served. DDA for respondents No.7 and 8 is present but he has not filed objections. Mr. Mujeeb Shar advocate is present and filed power on behalf of Respondent Agaydino alongwith application for time at Ex.........Order passed thereon. Counsel for appellant has prayed for interim status-quo as writ of possession has been issued by trial court. Order passed on order sheet and announced in open court. As per order, the interim status-quo is granted till next date of hearing. Put off to 27-10-2025 for filing objections of respondents No.L.R1-(i),7 and 8 and service. Repeat process against respondents No. 3,4 and all L.Rs of respondents No.1(except 1-(i) Agaydino),2,5 and 6 on cost by way of pasting and TCS with directions to submit delivery report of TCS to this court. For Service 0 0 ADJ II, Mirpurkhas
02-OCT-2025
Matter called. Appellant is absent. Counsel for appellant is present. Respondents No.7 and 8 are called absent. Process against remaining respondents returned un-served. DDA for respondents No.7 and 8 is present but he has not filed objections. The proceedings of 12(2) received. Put off to 11-10-2025 for filing objections of respondents No.7 and 8 and service. Repeat process against respondents No. 3,4 and all L.Rs of respondents No.1,2,5 and 6 on cost by way of pasting and TCS with directions to submit delivery report of TCS to this court. For Service 0 0 ADJ II, Mirpurkhas