| Hearing Date | Diary | Status | Units / Application | Witness | Court |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06-APR-2026 |
For Evidence | 0 | 0 | ADJ -II, Sanghar | |
| 28-MAR-2026 |
Dated: 28th March was declared holiday by the Government of Sindh. Today case called. Accused Ali Raza @ Paroo, Chakar Khan and Ali Gohar are present on bail. Accused Pasand Ali is called absent, who has been declared as P.O. ADPP for state and Mr. Jamshed Laghari advocate for complainant are present. Learned defence counsel Mr. Mian Taj Muhammad Keerio for accused Chakar Khan is called absent but co-counsel Mr. Ramz Ali is present. Mr. Afzal Karim Virk defence counsel for accused Ali Raza and Ali Gohar is called absent. Complainant is present. No other PWS are present. Court is lying vacant. Repeat process against the remaining PWs and call case property Put off to 06.04.2026 for evidence. Accused are directed to attend | For Evidence | 0 | 0 | ADJ -I, Sanghar Holiday: Saturday Holiday, as per Notification |
| 07-MAR-2026 |
The case called. Accused Ali Raza @ Paroo, Chakar Khan and Ali Gohar are present on bail. Accused Pasand Ali is called absent, who has been declared as P.O. ADPP for state and Mr. Jamshed Laghari advocate for complainant are present. Learned defence counsel Mr. Mian Taj Muhammad Keerio for accused Chakar Khan is called absent but co-counsel Mr. Ramz Ali is present. Mr. Afzal Karim Virk defence counsel for accused Ali Raza and Ali Gohar is called absent. Complainant is present. No other PWS are present. Court is lying vacant. Repeat process against the remaining PWs and call case property Put off to 28.03.2026 for evidence. Accused are directed to attend | For Evidence | 0 | 0 | ADJ -I, Sanghar |
| 21-FEB-2026 |
The case called. Accused Ali Raza @ Paroo, Chakar Khan and Ali Gohar are present on bail. Accused Pasand Ali is called absent, who has been declared as P.O. ADPP for state and Mr. Jamshed Laghari advocate for complainant are present. Learned defence counsel Mr. Mian Taj Muhammad Keerio for accused Chakar Khan is called absent but co-counsel Mr. Ramz Ali is present. Mr. Afzal Karim Virk defence counsel for accused Ali Raza and Ali Gohar is called absent. This case is marked as an old one. The Hohourable, High Court of Sindh, Karachi as per letter received from Honourable, District & Sessions Judge, Sanghar vide No. DJ SGR: No. 14383/2025 Sanghar Dated 02.12.2025 ordered to decide such cases expeditiously by fixing twice a week. Complainant is present. No other PWS are present. Court is lying vacant. Repeat process against the remaining PWs and call case property Put off to 07.03.2026 for evidence. Accused are directed to attend. | For Evidence | 0 | 0 | ADJ -I, Sanghar |
| 07-FEB-2026 |
The case called. Accused Ali Raza @ Paro, Chakar Khan and Ali Gohar are present on bail. Accused Pasand Ali is called absent, who has been declared as proclaimed offender. Mr. Jamaluddin Baladi ADPP for the state and Mr. Jamshed Laghatri counsel for complainant are present. Learned defence counsel Mr. Mian Taj Muhammad keerio defence counsel for accused Chakar Khan has been called absent but co-counsel Mr. Ramz Ali Mari advocate is present. Mr. Afzal karim Virk learned defence counsel for accused Ali Raza @ Paro and Ali Gohar is not present. The Honourable, District & Sessions Judge, Sanghar vide letter No. DJ SGR: No. 14383/2025 Sanghar Dated 02.12.2025 ordered to decide such cases expeditiously by fixing twice a week. Complainant along with one PW is present. P.O has been transferred. Court is lying vacant. By consent case is adjourned. To come up on 21.02.2026 for recording evidence of Pws as per law. Repeat process against the remaining Pws as ordered earlier and call case property. Complainant and present PW is directed to appear on next date without fail. Accused are directed to attend on next date. | For Evidence | 0 | 0 | ADJ -I, Sanghar |
| 17-JAN-2026 |
The case called. Accused Ali Raza @ Paro, Chakar Khan and Ali Gohar are present on bail. Accused Pasand Ali is called absent, who has been declared as proclaimed offender. Mr. Jamaluddin Baladi ADPP for the state is present. Learned defence counsel Mr. Mian Taj Muhammad keerio has been called absent. Mr. Afzal karim Virk learned defence counsel for accused Ali Raza @ Paro and Ali Gohar is present. Strict directions have been issued by the Honourable. District & Sessions Judge, Sanghar vide letter No. DJ SGR: No. 14383/2025 Sanghar Dated 02.12.2025 to fix like cases twice a week, but the learned defence counsel Mr. Afzal Karim Virk submits that he has several other cases in other Courts as well he cannot proceed this case twice a week and seeks adjournment for long date. Mr. Ramaz Ali Mari co-counsel for accused Chakar Khan appeared on behalf of his senior counsel Mr. Mian Taj Muhammad Keerio and he repeated the same submission. Complainant along with two PWs and learned counsel Mr. Jamshed Laghari is present since first call and is ready to proceed case as usual. Adjournments filed by the both learned counsels stands allowed as a last and final chance with the same directions and caution detailed in last case diary. Moreover Mr. Mir Mal Oad who is present today will proceed case if any of the learned defence counsel failed to proceed case on next date because this case pertains to year 2023 and two off shoot cases re being delayed by accused and PWs are being returne4d un-examined, due to frequent adjournment applications filed by the learned defence counsel. By consent case is adjourned. To come up on 07.02.2026 for recording evidence of Pws as per law. Repeat process against the remaining Pws as ordered earlier and call case property. Complainant and present PWs are directed to appear on next date without fail. Accused are directed to attend. | For Evidence | 0 | 0 | ADJ -I, Sanghar |
| 20-DEC-2025 |
The case called. Accused Ali Raza @ Paro, Chakar Khan and Ali Gohar are present on bail. Accused Pasand Ali is called absent, who has been declared as proclaimed offender. Mr. Jamaluddin Baladi ADPP for the state, Mr. Jamshed Laghari advocate for complainant, Mr. Afzal Karim Virk defence counsel for accused Ali Raza @ Paro and Ali Gohar, Mr. Mian Taj Muhammad Keerio defence counsel for accused Chakar Khan and Mr. Mir Mal Oad advocate for accused appointed on state expenses are present. Complainant along with three private PWs is present. Both learned defence counsel sought adjournment and filed such joint application by undertaking that they will proceed the case on next date. Order passed thereon. Heard. File Perused. Adjourned as a last chance with the same direction and caution because both learned defence counsel assured and promised to proceed case on next date as per law. The case in hand is marked as an old one. The Honourable, High Court of Sindh, Karachi as per letter received from Honourable, District & Sessions Judge, Sanghar vide No. DJ SGR: No. 14383/2025 Sanghar Dated 02.12.2025 ordered to decide such cases expeditiously by fixing twice a week. By consent and as per choice of both learned defence counsel the case in hand is adjourned to 17.01.2026 for recording evidence of Pws as per law. Repeat process against the remaining Pws as ordered earlier and call case property. Complainant and present PWs are directed to appear on next date without fail. Accused are directed to attend. | For Evidence | 0 | 0 | ADJ -I, Sanghar |
| 13-DEC-2025 |
The case called. Accused Ali Raza @ Paro, Chakar Khan and Ali Gohar are present on bail. Accused Pasand Ali is called absent, who has been declared as proclaimed offender. Mr. Jamaluddin Baladi ADPP for the state and Mr. Jamshed Laghari advocate for complainant are present. Mr. Afzal Karim Virk defence counsel for accused Ali Raza @ Paro and Ali Gohar called absent, but his co-counsel Mr. Hassan Maqsood is present, who sought adjournment and filed such application. Mr. Mian Taj Muhammad Keerio defence counsel for accused Chakar Khan called absent, but his co-counsel Mr. Ramz Ali advocate is present, who sought adjournment and filed such application. Order passed thereon. Per file in hand charge in this case was framed on 02.03.2023, but evidence of material PWs has not been got recorded as yet, and the learned defence counsel avoided and failed to proceed the case despite ample opportunity, this court???s direction as well as last chance from time to time, which caused delay and this case is therefore marked as an old one. The Hohourable, High Court of Sindh, Karachi as per letter received from Honourable, District & Sessions Judge, Sanghar vide No. DJ SGR: No. 14383/2025 Sanghar Dated 02.12.2025 ordered to decide such cases expeditiously by fixing twice in a week. Case in hand is full of adjournment applications filed by one or other learned defence counsel suggesting that the both learned defence counsel have no interest to proceed the case, obviously for reason that present accused are on bail, today both learned defence counsel Mr. Afzal Karim Virk and Mr. Mian Taj Muhammad Keerio as usual have been called absent and sent their juniors from Mirpurkhas and Hyderabad only to seek adjournment, which under the attending circumstances is mockery of law despite fact that private PWs along with the learned counsel Mr. Laghari are present at most on each and every date for recording their evidence. As such this court finds no further legal way except to appoint Mr. Mir Mal Oad advocate for defence of accused on state expenses as per Action Document March 2019 and concept of fair trial, with last opportunity and chance to the both learned defence counsel for accused through their junior council present in court today to proceed case on next date as per law and in case of failure the learned counsel appointed on state expense by this court today shall proceed case. Accused present in Court are strictly directed to produce their defence counsel on next date without fail. To come up on 20.12.2025 for recording evidence of Pws as per law. Repeat process against the remaining Pws as ordered earlier and call case property. Complainant and present PWs are directed to appear on next date without fail. Accused are directed to attend. | For Evidence | 0 | 0 | ADJ -I, Sanghar |
| 29-NOV-2025 |
The case called. Accused Ali Raza @ Paro, Chakar Khan and Ali Gohar are present on bail. Accused Pasand Ali is called absent, who has been declared as proclaimed offender. Mr. Jamaluddin Baladi ADPP for the state and Mr. Jamshed Laghari advocate for complainant are present. Mr. Afzal Karim Virk defence counsel for accused Ali Raza @ Paro and Ali Gohar called absent. Mr. Mian Taj Muhammad Keerio defence counsel for accused Chakar Khan called absent, but his co-counsel Mr. Ramz Ali advocate is present, who sought adjournment and filed such application. Order passed thereon. Adjourned as last chance with direction to proceed case on next date as per law. No PWs are present. Per file in hand charge in this case was framed on 02.03.2023, but evidence of material PWS has not been got recorded as yet, mostly due to absence of learned defence counsel, which causes delay in this case as well as off shoot cases, as such accused present in Court are strictly directed to produce their defence counsel on next date without fail. By consent case is adjourned. To come up on 13.12.2025 for recording evidence of Pws as per law. Repeat process against the remaining Pws as ordered earlier and call case property. Learned ADPP for state and learned counsel for complainant as well as learned defence counsel are strictly directed to proceed case on next date as per law. Complainant is strictly directed to produce complete set of private PWs on next date without fail. Accused are directed to attend. | For Evidence | 0 | 0 | ADJ -I, Sanghar |
| 15-NOV-2025 |
The case called. Accused Ali Raza @ Paro, Chakar Khan and Ali Gohar are present on bail. Accused Pasand Ali is called absent, who has been declared as proclaimed offender. Mr. Jamaluddin Baladi ADPP for the state and Mr. Jamshed Laghari advocate for complainant are present. Mr. Mian Taj Muhammad Keerio defence counsel for accused Chakar Khan called absent, but his co-counsel Mr. Ramz Ali advocate is present. Mr. Afzal Karim Virk defence counsel for accused Ali Raza @ Paro and Ali Gohar called absent. The process returned served/un-served. The complainant along with two private PWs is present. No other PWs are in attendance. Per file in hand charge in this case was framed on 02.03.2023, but evidence of material PWS has not been got recorded as yet, mostly due to absence of learned defence counsel, which causes delay in this case as well as off shoot cases, as such accused present in Court are strictly directed to produce their defence counsel on next date without fail. By consent case is adjourned. To come up on 29.11.2025 for recording evidence as per law. Repeat process against the remaining Pws as ordered earlier and call case property. The complainant and his two witnesses present in Court are directed to appear on the next date of hearing. Complainant is also strictly directed to produce his other remaining private PWs on next date without fail. Accused are directed to attend. | For Evidence | 0 | 0 | ADJ -I, Sanghar |