21-FEB-2026
|
|
For Evidence |
0 |
0 |
ADJ I, Ghotki
|
07-FEB-2026
|
Sessions case called. Accused of the first version of FIR No.261/2023 PS A-Section Ghotki, accused 1. Taj Muhammad, 2. Zain ul Abdin, 3. Ahmed Ali, 4. Zulfiqar Ali, 5. Rafique Ahmed, 6. Shafique Ahmed, 7. Imtiaz Ahmed @ Imtiaz Ali, 8. Mumtaz Ali, 9. Bhooral, 10. Abdul Rauf, 11. Niaz Ahmed (his appearance has been dispensed with) are present on bail, accused Saeed Ahmed (his appearance has been dispensed with vide order dated 08.11.2025) is called absent under intimation, one Niaz Ahmed submitted application for excusing his absence. Order on it. While accused of second version/cross version of the same incident, accused 1. Mukhtiar Ahmed, 2. Ghulam Nabi ((their appearance has been dispensed with vide order dated 08.11.2025), 3. Junaid Ahmed, 4. Ghulam Ali, 5. Sanaullah, 6. Bashir, 7. Rafique Ahmed, 08. Waqar Ahmed, 09. Sulleman, 10. Sardar Khan11. Muhammad Akhtar are present on bail, while accused 12. Allahdino Sanghar produce by J/A Ghotki, he filed application for appointing advocate on state expenses. Order on it. Accused (13) Murad S/O Hashim Lakhan was expired and proceedings against him already abated. The learned ADPP for the state, counsels for complainant and accused are present while learned counsel for accused Saeed Ahmed and Niaz Ahmed called absent but his clerk is present. Mr. Ghulam Yasin Naich learned advocdate filed Power on behalf of complainant of first version of FIR namely Rafique Ahmed. Order on it. He also filed Power on behalf accused Rafique Ahmed in second version/cross version. Order on it. The reply of show notices furnished by complainant/accused except accused Saeed Ahmed and Allah Dino Sanghar. Order passed thereon. On Process Complainants Rafique Ahmed and Taj Muhammad and PWs Sardar Khan, Muhammad Sulleman, Bhooral. Are present and bound down. The PJ is on casual leave and out of headquarter. Case put off to 21.02.2026, for evidence/cross examination and rpely of show cause notice of accused Saeed Ahmed and Allah Dino. Present accused are directed to attend and inform the absentee accused. Complainants and present PWs are directed to appear along with their all private PWs on the date of hearing. |
For Evidence |
0 |
0 |
ADJ I, Ghotki
|
28-JAN-2026
|
Sessions case called. Accused of the first version of FIR No.261/2023 PS A-Section Ghotki, accused 1. Imtiaz Ahmed called absent under intimation on his behalf co-accused Zain-ul-Abdin submitted application for excusing their absence. Order on it. Accused 2. Taj Muhammad, 3. Zain-ul-Abdin, 4. Ahmed Ali, 5. Zulfiar Ali, 6. Rafique Ahmed, 7. Shafique Ahmed, 8. Mumtaz Ali, 09. Bhooral 10. Abdul Rauf are present on bail, the appearance of accused 11. Saeed Ahmed are present on bail and 12. Niaz Ahmed has been dispense with vide order dated 08.11.2025. While accused of second version/cross version of the same incident, accused 1. Muhammad Akhtar, 2. Waqar Ahmed called absent under intimation on their behalf co-accused Junaid Ahmed submitted application for excusing the absence of both accused. Order on it. The appearance of accused 3. Mukhtiar Ahmed, 4. Ghulam Nabi has been dispense with vide order dated 08.11.2025, 5. Junaid Ahmed, 6. Ghulam Ali, 7. Sanaullah, 8. Bashir Ahmed, 9. Rafique Ahmed, 10. Sulleman, 11. Sardar Khan are present on bail, while accused 12. Allahdino Sanghar produce by J/A Ghotki. Accused (13) Murad S/O Hashim Lakhan was expired and proceedings against him already abated. The learned ADPP for the state, counsels for complainant and accused are present while learned counsel for accused Saeed Ahmed and Niaz Ahmed called absent and send application for adjournment. Order on it. Complainant of first version of FIR namely Rafique Ahmed, PWs Sardar Khan, Muhammad Sulleman are present and bound down. Complainant of second version of FIR namely Taj Muhammad and PWs namely Zulfiqar Ali and Bhooral are present and bound down, no other PWs present. Order passed on order sheet. It is clarified that firstly the version of complainant Rafique Ahmed and his witnesses will be examined and conclude in in trial and thereafter the version of subsequent complainant Taj Muhammad and his witnesses will be examined. Office is directed to issue notice accordingly to both parties and issue show cause notice to accused persons who have been exempted from appearance as their counsels are not appearing and they shall appear on next date to colarify that which person will appear on their behalf. Case put off to 07.02.2026, for evidence/cross examination. Present accused are directed to attend and inform the absentee accused. Complainants and present PWs are directed to appear along with their all private PWs on the date of hearing. |
For Evidence |
0 |
0 |
ADJ I, Ghotki
|
17-JAN-2026
|
Sessions case called. Accused of the first version of FIR No.261/2023 PS A-Section Ghotki, accused 1. Imtiaz Ahmed called absent under intimation on his behalf co-accused Zain-ul-Abdin submitted application for excusing their absence. Order on it. Accused 2. Taj Muhammad, 3. Zain-ul-Abdin, 4. Ahmed Ali, 5. Zulfiar Ali, 6. Rafique Ahmed, 7. Shafique Ahmed, 8. Mumtaz Ali, 09. Bhooral 10. Abdul Rauf are present on bail, the appearance of accused 11. Saeed Ahmed and 12. Niaz Ahmed has been dispense with vide order dated 08.11.2025. While accused of second version/cross version of the same incident, accused 1. Mukhtiar Ahmed and 2. Ghulam Nabi has been dispense with vide order dated 08.11.2025, 3. Junaid Ahmed, 4. Ghulam Ali, 5. Sanaullah, 6. Bashir Ahmed, 7. Rafique Ahmed, 08. Waqar Ahmed, 9. Sulleman, 10. Sardar Khan, 11. Muhammad Akhtar are present on bail, while accused 12. Allahdino Sanghar produce by J/A Ghotki. Accused (13) Murad S/O Hashim Lakhan was expired and proceedings against him already abated. The learned ADPP for the state, counsels for complainant and accused are present. Complainant of first version of FIR namely Rafique Ahmed, PWs Sardar Khan, Muhammad Sulleman are present and bound down. Complainant of second version of FIR namely Taj Muhammad and PWs namely Zulfiqar Ali and Bhooral are present and bound down, no other PWs present. Due to strike called by DBA Ghotki, the instant case is adjourned to 28.01.2026, for evidence/cross examination. Present accused are directed to attend and inform the absentee accused. Complainants and present PWs are directed to appear along with their all private PWs on the date of hearing. |
For Evidence |
0 |
0 |
ADJ I, Ghotki
|
13-JAN-2026
|
Sessions case called. Accused of the first version of FIR No.261/2023 PS A-Section Ghotki, accused 1. Ahmed Ali, 2. Zulfiqar Ali, 3. Imtiaz Ahmed @ Imtiaz Ali called absent under intimation on their behalf co-accused Zain-ul-Abdin submitted application for excusing their absence. Order on it. Accused 4. Taj Muhammad, 5. Zainul Abdin,6. Rafique Ahmed, 7. Shafique Ahmed, 8. Mumtaz Ali, 09. Bhooral and 10 Abdul Rauf are present on bail, the appearance of accused 11. Saeed Ahmed and 12. Niaz Ahmed has been dispense with vide order dated 08.11.2025. While accused of second version/cross version of the same incident, Accused The appearance of accused 1. Mukhtiar Ahmed, 2. Ghulam Nabi has been dispense with vide order dated 08.11.2025, 3. Junaid Ahmed, 4. Ghulam Ali, 5. Sanaullah, 6. Bashir Ahmed, 7. Rafique Ahmed, 8. Waqar Ahmed, 9. Sulleman, 10. Sardar Khan, 11 Muhammad Akhtar, while accused 12. Allahdino Sanghar produce by J/A Ghotki. Accused (13) Murad S/O Hashim Lakhan was expired and proceedings against him already abated. The learned ADPP for the state, counsels for complainant and accused are present. Complainant of first version of FIR namely Rafique Ahmed, PWs Sardar Khan, Muhammad Sulleman are present and bound down. Complainant of second version of FIR namely Taj Muhammad is present and bound down. Due to absence of some PWs and accused, the instant case is adjourned to 17.01.2026, for evidence/cross examination. Present accused are directed to attend and inform the absentee accused. Complainant and present PWs are directed to appear along with their all private PWs on the date of hearing. |
For Evidence |
0 |
0 |
ADJ I, Ghotki
|
07-JAN-2026
|
Sessions case called. Accused of the first version of FIR No.261/2023 PS A-Section Ghotki, accused 1. Ahmed Ali, 2. Zulfiqar Ali, 3. Rafique Ahmed, 4. Imtiaz Ahmed @ Imtiaz Ali called absent under intimation on their behalf learned counsel filed application for excusing their behalf. Order on it. Accused 5. Taj Muhammad, 6. Zainul Abdin, 7. Shafique Ahmed, 8. Mumtaz Ali, 09. Bhooral and 10 Abdul Rauf are present on bail, the appearance of accused 11. Saeed Ahmed and 12. Niaz Ahmed has been dispense with vide order dated 08.11.2025. While accused of second version/cross version of the same incident, Accused 1. Bashir Ahmed, 2. Rafique Ahmed and 3. Muhammad Akhtar called absent under intimation on their behalf co-accused Junaid Ahmed submitted application for excusing their absence. Order on it. The appearance of accused 4. Mukhtiar Ahmed, 5. Ghulam Nabi has been dispense with vide order dated 08.11.2025, accused 6. Junaid Ahmed, 7. Ghulam Ali, 8. Sanaullah, 9. Waqar Ahmed, 10. Sulleman, 11. Sardar Khan are present on bail, while accused 12. Allahdino Sanghar produce by J/A Ghotki. Accused (13) Murad S/O Hashim Lakhan was expired and proceedings against him already abated. The learned ADPP for the state, counsels for complainant and accused are present. Complainant of first version of FIR namely Rafique Ahmed, PWs Sardar Khan, Muhammad Sulleman and Ghulam Ali are present and bound down. Complainant of second version of FIR namely Taj Muhammad and his witness Bhooral are present and bound down. Due to absence of some PWs and accused, the instant case is adjourned to 13.01.2026, for evidence/cross examination. Present accused are directed to attend and inform the absentee accused. Complainant and present PWs are directed to appear along with their all private PWs on the date of hearing. |
For Evidence |
0 |
0 |
ADJ I, Ghotki
|
23-DEC-2025
|
Sessions case called. Accused of the first version of FIR No.261/2023 PS A-Section Ghotki, accused 1. Ahmed Ali and 2. Imtiaz Ahmed @ Imtiaz Ali called absent under intimation on their behalf co-accused Zain-ul-Abdin submitted application for excusing their absence. Ordre on it. Accused 3. Taj Muhammad, 4. Zainul Abdin, 5. Zulfiar, 6. Rafique Ahmed, 7. Shafique Ahmed, 8. Mumtaz Ali, 09. Bhooral and 10 Abdul Rauf are present on bail, the appearance of accused 11. Saeed Ahmed and 12. Niaz Ahmed has been dispense with vide order dated 08.11.2025. While accused of second version/cross version of the same incident, Accused 1. Junair Ahmed and 02. Waqar Ahmed called absent under intimation on their behalf co-accused Rafique Ahmed submitted application for excusing their absence. Order on it. The appearance of accused 3. Mukhtiar Ahmed, 4. Ghulam Nabi has been dispense with vide order dated 08.11.2025, accused 5.Ghulam, 6. Sanaullah, 7. Bashir, 8. Rafique Ahmed, Sulleman, 10. Sardar Khan, 11. Muhammad Akbar are present on bail, while accused 12. Allahdino Sanghar produce by J/A Ghotki. Accused (13) Murad S/O Hashim Lakhan was expired and proceedings against him already abated. The learned ADPP for the state, counsels for complainant and accused are present. Complainant of first version of FIR namely Rafique Ahmed, PWs Sardar Khan, Muhammad Sulleman and Ghulam Ali are present and bound down. Complainant of second version of FIR namely Taj Muhammad and his witnesses Zulfiqar Ali, Bhooral, Muhammad Moosa are present and bound down. Learned counsel for accused Junaid Ahmed submitted application u/s 540 Cr.P.C. Order on it. The chief of witness Zulfiqar Ali recorded at Exh.09. At this stage cross reserved at the request of learned D.C. Case Put off to 07.01.2026, for Evidence/cross examination. Present accused are directed to attend and inform the absentee accused. Complainant and present PWs are directed to appear along with their all private PWs on the date of hearing. |
For Evidence |
0 |
0 |
ADJ I, Ghotki
|
17-DEC-2025
|
Sessions case called. Accused of the first version of FIR No.261/2023 PS A-Section Ghotki, accused 1. Ahmed Ali and 2. Imtiaz Ahmed @ Imtiaz Ali called absent under intimation on their behalf co-accused Zain-ul-Abdin submitted application for excusing their absence. Ordre on it. Accused 3. Taj Muhammad, 4. Zainul Abdin, 5. Zulfiar, 6. Rafique Ahmed, 7. Shafique Ahmed, 8. Mumtaz Ali, 09. Bhooral and 10 Abdul Rauf are present on bail, the appearance of accused 11. Saeed Ahmed and 12. Niaz Ahmed has been dispense with vide order dated 08.11.2025. While accused of second version/cross version of the same incident, Accused 1. Bashir called absent under intimation on his behalf Junaid Ahmed submitted application for excusing his absence. Order on it. The appearance of accused 2. Mukhtiar Ahmed. 3. Ghulam Nabi has been dispense with vide order dated 08.11.2025, accused 4. Junaid Ahmed, 5. Ghulam Nabi, 6. Sanaullah, 7. Rafique Ahmed, 8. Waqar Ahmed, 9. Sulleman, 10. Sardar Khan, and 11. Muhammad Akhtar are present on bail, while accused 12. Allahdino Sanghar produce by J/A Ghotki. Accused (13) Murad S/O Hashim Lakhan was expired and proceedings against him already abated. The learned ADPP for the state, counsel for complainant and accused are present while learned counsel for complainant Taj Muhammad called absent but his associate is present. Counsel for accused Saeed Ahmed and Niaz Ahmed called absent. Complainant of first version of FIR namely Rafique Ahmed, PWs Sardar Khan, Muhammad Sulleman are present and bound down. Complainant of second version of FIR namely Taj Muhammad and his witnesses are present. The PJ is on casual leave and out of headquarter. Case Put off to 23.12.2025, for Evidence/cross examination. Present accused are directed to attend and inform the absentee accused. Complainant and present PWs are directed to appear along with their all private PWs on the date of hearing. |
For Evidence |
0 |
0 |
ADJ I, Ghotki
|
13-DEC-2025
|
Sessions case/appl: U/S 497-(5) Cr.P.C called. Accused of the first version of FIR No.261/2023 PS A-Section Ghotki, accused 1. Imtiaz Ahmed @ Imtiaz Ali called absent under intimation on his behalf co-accused Zain-ul-Abdin submitted application for excusing his absence. Ordre on it. Accused 2. Taj Muhammad,, 3. Zainul Abdin, 4. Ahmed Ali, 5. Zulfiar, 6. Rafique Ahmed, 7. Shafique Ahmed, 8. Mumtaz Ali, , 09. Bhooral and 10 Abdul Rauf are present on bail, the appearance of accused Saeed Ahmed and Niaz Ahmed has been dispense with vide order dated 08.11.2025. While accused of second version/cross version of the same incident, The appearance of accused 1. Mukhtiar Ahmed. 2. Ghulam Nabi has been dispense with vide order dated 08.11.2025, accused , 3. Junaid Ahmed, 4. Ghulam Nabi, 5. Sanaullah, 6. Bashir, 7. Rafique Ahmed, 8. Waqar Ahmed, 9. Sulleman, 10. Sardar Khan, and 11. Muhammad Akhtar are present on bail, while accused 12. Allahdino Sanghar produce by J/A Ghotki. Accused (13) Murad S/O Hashim Lakhan was expired and proceedings against him already abated. The learned ADPP for the state, counsel for complainant and accused are present while learned counsel for complainant Taj Muhammad called absent but his associate is present and submitted application for adjournment. Ordre on it. Counsel for accused Saeed Ahmed and Niaz Ahmed called absent. Complainant of first version of FIR namely Rafique Ahmed, PWs Sardar Khan, Muhammad Sulleman are present and bound down. Complainant of second version of FIR namely Taj Muhammad and his witnesses are present. Case Put off to 17.12.2025, for Evidence/cross examination. Present accused are directed to attend and inform the absentee accused. Complainant and present PWs are directed to appear along with their all private PWs on the date of hearing. |
For Evidence |
0 |
0 |
ADJ I, Ghotki
|
29-NOV-2025
|
Sessions case/appl: U/S 497-(5) Cr.P.C called. Accused of the first version of FIR No.261/2023 PS A-Section Ghotki, accused 1. Taj Muhammad,, 2. Zainul Abdin, 3. Ahmed Ali, 4. Zulfiar, 5. Rafique Ahmed, 6. Shafique Ahmed, 7. Imtiaz Ahmed @ Imtiaz Ali, 8. Mumtaz Ali, , 09. Bhooral and 10 Abdul Rauf are present on bail, the appearance of accused Saeed Ahmed and Niaz Ahmed has been dispense with vide order dated 08.11.2025. While accused of second version/cross version of the same incident, Accused 1. Bashir is called absent under intimation on his co-accused Junaid Ahmed submitted application for excusing their absence. Order on it. The appearance of accused 2. Mukhtiar Ahmed. 3. Ghulam Nabi has been dispense with vide order dated 08.11.2025, accused , 4. Junaid Ahmed, 5. Ghulam Nabi, 6. Sanaullah, 7. Rafique Ahmed, 8. Waqar Ahmed, 9. Sulleman, 10. Sardar Khan, and 11. Muhammad Akhtar are present on bail, while accused 12. Allahdino Sanghar produce by J/A Ghotki. Accused (13) Murad S/O Hashim Lakhan was expired and proceedings against him already abated. The learned ADPP for the state, counsels for complainants and accused are present. Complainant of first version of FIR namely Rafique Ahmed, PWs Sardar Khan, Muhammad Sulleman are present and bound down. Complainant of second version of FIR namely Taj Muhammad and his witnesses are present. M/S Sanaullah Mahar & co filed Power on behalf o the accused Saeed Ahmed and Niaz Ahmed. Order on it. The PJ is on out of headquarter. Case Put off to 13.12.2025, for Evidence/cross examination. Present accused are directed to attend and inform the absentee accused. Complainant and present PWs are directed to appear along with their all private PWs on the date of hearing. |
For Evidence |
0 |
0 |
ADJ I, Ghotki
|