21-NOV-2026
|
|
For Issues |
0 |
0 |
SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Warrah
|
14-NOV-2026
|
Suit called. The attorney of the plaintiff is present, but his learned counsel absent. Defendant No. 01/C, who is the attorney of defendant's No. 01/B and 01/D, was present; however, his learned counsel was absent. Official defendants No. 03 and 04 had already filed their written statements (W.S.). Defendants No. 02 and 05, had already been debarred. The acknowledgment due (A.D.) in respect of official defendant No. 06 had already been received; however, the said defendant was called absent. The learned DDA was present and had already filed a memo of appearance on behalf of official defendants No. 02 to 08. ADR proceedings stands unsuccessful at this stage let the issues be framed. Oreder passed on seperate sheet. Put off to 21.11.2026 for issues filing of objections to the application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC, and arguments on the application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. P.O is on casual leave. |
For W/S/Objections/C.A. |
0 |
0 |
SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Warrah
|
31-OCT-2026
|
Suit called. The attorney of the plaintiff is present, but his learned counsel absent. Defendant No. 01/C, who is the attorney of defendant's No. 01/B and 01/D, was present; however, his learned counsel was absent. Official defendants No. 03 and 04 had already filed their written statements (W.S.). Defendants No. 02 and 05, despite service, were called absent and had already been debarred. The acknowledgment due (A.D.) in respect of official defendant No. 06 had already been received; however, the said defendant was called absent. The learned DDA was present and had already filed a memo of appearance on behalf of official defendants No. 02 to 08. The DDA already filed statement by official defendant No. 03 was adopted on behalf of official defendants No. 02, 04, 05 and 06, and order already passed. Put off to 14.11.2026 for compliance with Order X Rule 2 CPC, filing of objections to the application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC, and arguments on the application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. P.O is on casual leave. |
For W/S/Objections/C.A. |
0 |
0 |
SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Warrah
|
20-OCT-2026
|
Suit called. The attorney of the plaintiff was present along with learned counsel and filed objections to the application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Order thereon. Copy be supplied to the other side. Defendant No. 01/C, who is the attorney of defendant's No. 01/B and 01/D, was present; however, his learned counsel was absent. Official defendants No. 03 and 04 had already filed their written statements (W.S.). Defendants No. 02 and 05, despite service, were called absent and had already been debarred. The acknowledgment due (A.D.) in respect of official defendant No. 06 had already been received; however, the said defendant was called absent. The learned DDA was present and had already filed a memo of appearance on behalf of official defendants No. 02 to 08. The DDA statement filed by official defendant No. 03 was adopted on behalf of official defendants No. 02, 04, 05 and 06. Order thereon. Filed. Put off to 31.10.2026 for compliance with Order X Rule 2 CPC, filing of objections to the application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC, and arguments on the application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. |
For W/S/Objections/C.A. |
0 |
0 |
SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Warrah
|
10-OCT-2026
|
Suit called. The attorney of plaintiff called present and submitted adjournment application for absence of his counsel. Order on it. Time granted. The defendant No.01/C who is attorney of defendant No.01/B and 01/D called absent, along with his counsel. The official defendant No: 03 and 4 are already submitted W.S. The defendant No.2 and 5 are served but called absent and already de-barred. AD from the official defendant No.06 is already received but called absent. The D.D.A called absent and already filed memo of appearance official defendant 02 to 08. Put off to 20.10.2026 for compliance of order 10 (2) and objection on application u/o 39 rule 1 CPC so also objection on application u/o VII rule 11 CPC. |
For W/S/Objections/C.A. |
0 |
0 |
SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Warrah
|
26-SEP-2026
|
Suit called. The attorney of plaintiff called present, but his counsel called absent. The defendant No.01/C who is attorney of defendant No.01/B and 01/D called present, but his counsel called absent. The official defendant No: 03 and 4 are already submitted W.S. The defendant No.2 and 5 are served but called absent and already de-barred. AD from the official defendant No.06 is already received but called absent. The D.D.A called absent and already filed memo of appearance official defendant 02 to 08. Put off to 10.10.2026 for compliance of order 10 (2) and objection on application u/o 39 rule 1 CPC so also objection on application u/o VII rule 11 CPC. The Honourable P.O is on casual leave. |
For W/S/Objections/C.A. |
0 |
0 |
SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Warrah
|
19-SEP-2026
|
Suit called. The attorney of plaintiff called present, but his counsel called absent. The defendant No.01/C who is attorney of defendant No.01/B and 01/D called present and submitted adjournment application for absence of his counsel. Order on it. The official defendant No: 03 and 4 are already submitted W.S. The defendant No.2 and 5 are served but called absent and de-barred. Order on order sheet kept at Ex.No. AD from the official defendant No.06 is received but called absent. The D.D.A called absent and already filed memo of appearance official defendant 02 to 08. Put off to 26.09.2026 for compliance of order 10 (2) and objection on application u/o 39 rule 1 CPC so also objection on application u/o VII rule 11 CPC. |
For W/S/Objections/C.A. |
0 |
0 |
SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Warrah
|
12-SEP-2026
|
Suit called. The attorney of plaintiff called absent, along with his counsel. The defendant No.01/C who is attorney of defendant No.01/B and 01/D called absent, along with his counsel. The official defendant No: 03 and 4 are already submitted W.S. The defendant No.2 and 5 are served but called absent. AD from the official defendant No.06 is received but called absent. The D.D.A called absent and already filed memo of appearance official defendant 02 to 08. Put off to 19.09.2026 for official W.S and objection on application u/o 39 rule 1 CPC so also objection on application u/o VII rule 11 CPC. |
For W/S/Objections/C.A. |
0 |
0 |
SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Warrah
|
22-AUG-2026
|
Suit called. The attorney of plaintiff called present, but his counsel called absent. The defendant No.01/C who is attorney of defendant No.01/B and 01/D present, along with his counsel. The official defendant No: 03 and 4 are already submitted W.S. The defendant No.2 and 5 are served but called absent. AD from the official defendant No.06 is received but called absent. The D.D.A called absent and already filed memo of appearance official defendant 02 to 08. Put off to 05.09.2026 for W.S and objection on application u/o 39 rule 1 CPC. The Honourable P.O is on earned leave. |
For W/S/Objections/C.A. |
0 |
0 |
SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Warrah
|
11-AUG-2026
|
Suit called. The attorney of plaintiff called present, but his counsel called absent. The defendant No.01/C who is attorney of defendant No.01/B and 01/D present, along with his counsel. The official defendant No: 03 and 4 are already submitted W.S. The defendant No.2 and 5 are served but called absent. AD from the official defendant No.06 is received but called absent. The D.D.A called absent and already filed memo of appearance official defendant 02 to 08. Put off to 22.08.2026 for W.S and objection on application u/o 39 rule 1 CPC. The Honourable P.O is on casual leave. |
For W/S/Objections/C.A. |
0 |
0 |
SCJ / Assistant Sessions Judge, Warrah
|