06-DEC-2025
|
|
For W/S/Objections/C.A. |
0 |
0 |
DJ , Ghotki
|
18-NOV-2025
|
CMA called. Applicant Abdul Hafeez is present with his learned counsel. Respondent No.1 Muhammad Hassan, who is attorney of respondents No.2 to 4 is present with his learned counsel. Learned I/C D.A for official respondents No.5 to 9 is present. Respondents No.10,12,15,16,22,25 and 27 called absent, despite service of notice. Per endorsement of Bailiff, respondents No.11,13,14,17 to 21, 23 and 24 have refused to acknowledge the notice. Service of notice upon respondents being served is held good. Adjourned to 06.12.2025, for C.A/objections of respondent No.1 to 9 and appearance of rest respondents as well arguments. |
For W/S/Objections/C.A. |
0 |
0 |
DJ , Ghotki
|
04-NOV-2025
|
CMA called. Applicant Abdul Hafeez is present. Mr. Mian Abdul Salam Arain, learned counsel for applicant is present. Respondent No.1 Muhammad Hassan, who is attorney of respondents No.2 to 4 is present. Learned I/C D.A for official respondents No.5 to 9 is present. Respondents No.10,12,15,16,22,25 and 27 called absent, despite service of notice, while respondents No.11,13,14,17 to 21, 23 and 24 refused to acknowledge the notice per endorsement of Bailiff. Notice issued to them through registered post, but to no avail. M/s Ghulam Yaseen Naich, Mushtaq Ali Channa and Raja Awais Ahmed Awan, Adv. filed their joint power on behalf of respondents No.1 to 4 through their attorney respondent No.1 Muhammad Hassan with copy of power of attorney, which is placed on record. Adjourned to 18.11.2025, for C.A/objections of respondent No.1 to 9 and appearance of rest respondents. |
For Service |
0 |
0 |
DJ , Ghotki
|
22-OCT-2025
|
CMA called. Applicant Abdul Hafeez is present. His learned counsel called absent. Respondent No.1 Muhammad Hassan is present on service of notice for himself as well for respondents No.2 to 4 being their brother and attorney. He filed application for grant of time to engage his counsel and proceed matter. Time allowed. Learned I/C D.A filed memo of his appearance on behalf of respondents No.5 to 9, which is placed on record. Service of notices upon respondents No.1 to 9 is held good. Notice to respondents No.10 to 26 issued, returned duly served upon respondents No.10, 12, 15, 16, 22, 25 & 26. They are called absent, despite service of notice. Per endorsement of Bailiff, respondents No.11, 13, 14, 17 to 21, 23 and 24 have refused to acknowledge the notice. Repeat notice to respondents No.10 to 26 through registered post AD and other available modes on costs. Adjourned to 04.11.2025, for C.A/objections of respondent No.1 to 9 and service of notice upon rest respondents. |
For Service |
0 |
0 |
DJ , Ghotki
|