09-SEP-2026
|
Criminal revision application is called. The applicants are present along with their counsel. The respondent NO.01 appeared on notice. Mr Muhammad Sadik Malik advocate has filed his vakalatnama on behalf of the respondent No.01, which is taken on record. The ADPP for the State is present. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced.?? consequently, based on judicious assessment of entire material including the complaint, enquiry report and the impugned order I am clear in my mind that complaint so filed is baseless, tainted with malice and no prima facie case exists to stand trial of present applicants-accused and the impugned order containing not even a single reason or justification, which is a legal requirement is not sustainable thus I feel no hesitation to accept revision application in hand and to set aside the impugned order which results in dismissal of direct complaint in terms of section 203 Cr.P.C. Let copy of this order be communicated to the learned Judicial Magistrate-I Ubauro as warranted under law. |
Hearing of Criminal Revision |
0 |
0 |
ADJ III, Ghotki
|